brac minutes...20 dec process overview brac report capacity responses to jcsgs mv briefs to isg...
TRANSCRIPT
-
1Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
BRAC 2005
Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group
January 7, 2005
-
2Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
PurposeProcess Overview
Summary of Conflict Review
Force Structure Plan Status
Candidate Recommendations
Process
H&SA
Wedge Allocation Rules
-
3Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
CY 2003O N D
CY 2004J F M A M J J A S O N D
CY 2005J F M A M
Joint Cross-Service Groups
Military Departments ISG
Rev
iew
IEC
Rev
iew
Coo
rdin
atio
n
Rep
ort W
ritin
g
Finalize Recommendations
Final Selection Criteria
Draft Selection Criteria
Commissioner Nominations
Deadline
Capacity Data Call
Mil Value Data Call
Issued
SecDef Recommendations
to Commission
JCSG Recommendations
Due to ISG20 Dec
Process Overview
BRACReport
Capacity Responses to
JCSGs
MV Briefsto ISG
JPATsCriteria 6-8
Work
BRAC Hearings
Mil Value Responses to
JCSGs
Scenario Development
CapacityAnalysis
Military ValueAnalysis
MilDepsRecommendations
Due20 Jan
Scenario Development
CapacityAnalysis
Military ValueAnalysis
Start Scenario Data Calls
ScenarioDeconfliction
Revised Force Structure Plan
Deadline
-
4Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
New Conflict Review
As of 23 Dec 04 - 946 Registered Scenarios 4 New Conflicting Scenarios
Proposed resolutions for all new conflicts settled presented now for approval
41 Not Ready for Categorization 552 Independent 42 Enabling 150 Deleted
Approve proposed resolutions (Tab 4)
-
JO TNI
S TAFF
CHIE FS OF
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes OnlyDo Not Release Under FOIA
7 JAN 24 JAN 4 FEB 18 FEB NLT 15 MAR
ISG ApprovalOf Plan
ServiceUpdates Due
OSDComments Due
JS ProvidesOSD FSP
SecDef SubmitsFSP to Congress
BRAC Force Structure Plan (FSP) UpdateUNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Issue: FSP due to Congress NLT 15 Mar 05.
Oct 04 Staffing Services updated Mar 04 plan.
Dec 04 Staffing Services updated Oct 04 submission.
Army: Provided update, no issues.Navy: Will modify Oct 04 submissionUSAF: Will provide missile numbers, no AC/RC breakout beyond 2006.USMC: Provided update, no issues.
1 Non-ConcurPA&E: Submission must comply with Presidential Budget (due to Congress 7
Feb) sufficient fidelity available mid-Jan.
Recommendation: ISG approve following timeline
-
JO TNI
S TAFF
CHIE FS OF
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes OnlyDo Not Release Under FOIA
Interim Force Structure Plan (FSP) ReleaseUNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Issue: BRAC statute requires MilDeps and JCSGs to produce recommendations compliant with the FSP
Fully staffed FSP not available Additional staffing required to resolve conflicts. Must be based on Presidents Budget (due to Congress 7 Feb)
Recommendation: ISG approve issuing interim FSP for MilDep/JCSG use. ISG direct issuance of final FSP as soon as signed by SecDef.
-
7Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Candidate Recommendation ProcessCandidate recommendations will be posted to the Portal as received Packages received by noon Friday, will be considered at the next weeks ISG
Following Monday, OSD BRAC Office provides formal read-aheadFollowing Wednesday, DASs discuss the candidate recommendations, isolate issues for the ISGs consideration Following Friday, JCSG Chair or MilDep designee will brief their respective candidate recommendations to ISGPotential ISG actions: approve and prepare for IEC consideration approve but hold for consideration of an enabling scenario; disapprove; note any conflicts that need to be considered and resolved; or hold for more information or a related candidate recommendation.
-
8Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Candidate RecommendationsHeadquarters & Support Activities
-
9
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA JCSG Road Map
Military Personnel Centers
Civilian Personnel Offices
Reserve & Recruiting Commands
Combatant Commands
Correctional Facilities
Major Admin & HQ
Financial Management
Defense Agencies
Geo-clusters & Functional
Major Admin & HQ
Mobilization
Installation Management (12 of 14)
Mobilization
-
10
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Statistics
HSA JCSG Currently has:
188 Ideas
106 Scenarios Declared
25 CandidateRecommendations
178 Proposals
0 Ideas Waiting
0 Proposals Waiting
58 Proposals Deleted
10 Ideas
Deleted
14 Scenarios Deleted
61 ScenariosWaiting
__ ISG Approved &Prep for IEC
__ ISG On Hold for AddlInfo or Related
Candidate Recommendation
__ ISG Approved, but on Hold for Enabling
Scenario
__ ISG Disapproved Note Conflict(s) to be
Considered & Resolved
20 Rejected asCandidate
Recommendations
-
11
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
DFAS -- 26 Locations to 3 Locations
Green Retained SitesRed Closed SitesBlack Special Purpose Sites
Oakland
Seaside
San Bernardino
San Diego
Pacific Ford Island
HawaiiJapan
Europe
Denver
Indianapolis
San Antonio
Lawton
Omaha
Kansas City
St. LouisLexington
Dayton
Cleveland
Rome
Limestone
ArlingtonPatuxant River, MD
Norfolk
Charleston
Orlando
Pensacola NAS
Pensacola Saufley Fld
Rock Island
Columbus
Red River TX
Southbridge MACleveland Bratenahl
Mechanicsbug PA
-
12
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Candidate # HSA0018 Defense Finance & Accounting Service (DFAS)
Justification Military Value Supports DFAS Transformation Plan.Mission consolidation - Unit Cost reduction.DFAS out of NCR (399); retains small liaison staff (6).Gaining sites meet DoD AT/FP standards.Maximizes facility/business operation efficiencies, mitigates man-made & natural disasters/challenges.Eliminates excess capacity, Admin 51% or 2.084M GSF and Warehouse 75% or .568M GSF.
Military Value among 30: Denver 3; Columbus 9; Indianapolis 12Prior Avg. MV: = .621; Resultant Avg. MV: = .689Military Judgment and Business Process Review analysis results: optimizes economies of scale/synergistic efficiencies to maximize potential for unit cost reductions and improve service, and minimizes risk of man-made and natural disasters/ challenges.
Payback Impacts
One Time Cost: $293MNet Implementation savings: $134MAnnual Recurring savings: $120MPayback period: ImmediateNPV savings: $1.233B
Criterion 6: -72 to -1888 jobs; less than 0.1% to 1.08%.Criterion 7: No issues. Criterion 8: No issues.Other risks associated with implementation: Workforce, space availability, operating costs.
Candidate Recommendation (Summary): Close 21 DFAS locations by relocating and consolidating all functions to the Defense Supply Center-Columbus, OH, the Buckley AF Base Annex, Denver, CO, or the MG Emmett J. Bean Federal Center, Indianapolis, IN. Realign DFAS Arlington, VA, by relocating/consolidating functions same as above, and retain minimum essential liaison staff. Realign DFAS Cleveland, OH, by relocating/consolidating functions same as above, and retain an enclave for Military Retired and Annuitant Pay Services contract function. Realign DFAS Columbus, OH; Denver, CO, and Indianapolis, IN by relocating portions of the Accounting Operation, Military, and Commercial Pay functions and supporting functions among the three locations to implement strategic redundancy.
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
13
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Military Personnel Centers
Consolidate AF Personnel Functions (Mil & Civ) @ Randolph
HSA-0111GC-MPC-0015
CONCEPT
JOINT SERVICE UNIQUE
MEGA San Antonio(includes MC)
HSA-0002GC-MPC-0001
MEGA Ft Leavenworth(includes MC)
HSA-0005GC-MPC-0010
AIR FORCE NAVY
AF @ Randolph(includes Recruiting)
HSA-0008GC-MPC-0013
NAVY @ Millington(includes Recruiting)
HSA-0007GC-MPC-0012
ARMY HRC @ Knox(includes Recruiting)
HSA-0006GC-MPC-0011
ARMY HRC @ Ft Sam Houston(includes Recruiting)
HSA-0074GC-MPC-0014
ARMY & AF @ RandolphHSA-0004
GC-MPC-0009
OR
OR ARMY
OR
*Partially-Joint Concept*
ORORE
E
Randolph AFB - AF, Navy, MCFt. Sam Houston - Army
E
EE
-
14
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Military Personnel & RecruitingScenario Candidate Strategy
Losing Locations
Army (HSA-0006)HR Command, AlexandriaHR Command, St LouisHR Command, IndianapolisAccessions & Cadet Commands,
Ft Monroe
Navy (HSA-0007)Navy Reserve Personnel &Navy Recruiting, New Orleans
Air Force (HSA-0008)AF Reserve Personnel, BuckleyAF Reserve Recruiting, Robins
Gaining Locations(Current Resident Activity)
USA Recruiting Command, Ft Knox
Navy Personnel &Recruiting,NSA Mid-South(Millington)
AF Personnel & Recruiting,Randolph
-
15
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0006: Create an Army Human Resources (Personnel & Recruiting) Center of Excellence at Fort Knox
Justification Military Value
Enables mission consolidation of Active & Reserve personnel center functions. Co-location of Recruiting functions improves personnel life-cycle management.Eliminates excess capacity and leased space
Recruiting function: Fort Monroe 100/147; Fort Knox 12/147Military Personnel: Ft Knox was selected because of its high overall military value as the current location of the US Army Recruiting Command, which offers synergies with the military personnel function.
Payback Impacts
One Time Cost: $ 99.0 MNet Implementation Savings: $ 462.5 MAnnual Recurring Savings: $ 145.5 M Payback Period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $ 1.78 B
Criterion 6: DC Area ROI : - 3,734 jobs; 0.1%St Louis ROI: - 4,171 jobs; 0.3%Indianapolis ROI: - 226 jobs; less than 0.1%Norfolk ROI: - 820 jobs; less than 0.1%
Criterion 7: Proximity to Louisville mitigates child care, housing, and medical issues Criterion 8: Overall, no known environmental impediments.Other Risks Associated with Implementation: Skilled civilian workforce availability in concentrated GS-series.
Candidate Recommendation: Close Army Human Resources Command leased facilities in Alexandria, Virginia, Indianapolis, Indiana, and St. Louis, Missouri, relocating and consolidating all functions at Fort Knox, Kentucky. Realign Fort Monroe, Virginia, by relocating Army Accessions Command and Cadet Command to Fort Knox, Kentucky.
StrategyCOBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data VerificationMilitary Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep RecommendedCriteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGsDe-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
16
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0007: Create a Navy Human Resources (Personnel & Recruiting) Center of Excellence at Millington
Justification Military Value Enables mission consolidation of Active & Reserve personnel center functions. Improves personnel life-cycle management and eliminates excess capacity.
NSA New Orleans 0.713. NSA Mid-South in Millington 0.729.Military judgment: Co-location of Personnel & Recruiting Commands favored Millington.
Payback ImpactsOne Time Cost: $ 13.7 MNet Implementation Cost: $ 2.2 MAnnual Recurring Savings: $ 6.3 M Payback Period: 2 YearsNPV (savings): $ 57.4 M
Criterion 6: - 771 jobs; 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues Criterion 8: No environmental impediments
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Naval Support Activity New Orleans, Louisiana by relocating the Navy Reserve Personnel Command, Enlisted Placement and Management Center, and the Navy Recruiting Command office to Naval Support Activity Mid-South, Millington, TN. Consolidate the relocating Navy Reserve Personnel Command and the Enlisted Placement and Management Center with the Navy Personnel Command at Naval Support Activity Mid-South, Millington, TN. Consolidate the relocating Navy Recruiting Command office with the Navy Recruiting Command office currently at Naval Support Activity Mid-South, Millington, TN.
StrategyCOBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data VerificationMilitary Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/Mildep RecommendedCriteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGsDe-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
17
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0008: Create an Air Force Human Resources (Personnel & Recruiting) Center of Excellence at Randolph
Justification Military Value Same transformational strategy for Personnel & Recruiting as applied to the Army & Navy.Enables mission consolidation of Active & Reserve personnel center functions and elimination of excess capacity.Co-location of Recruiting functions improves personnel life-cycle management.
Personnel: Buckley Annex, 0.476; Randolph AFB, 0.723. Recruiting: Military judgment dominated over quantitative scores.
Co-location of Personnel Centers, Recruiting Commands, and Education & Training Command at a single location provides the greatest overall value for the Department.
Payback ImpactsOne Time Cost: $ 32.0 MNet Implementation Cost: $ 31.8 MAnnual Recurring Savings: $ 1.1 MNPV (cost): $ 17.0 MPayback Period: 86 Years
Criterion 6: Denver ROI: - 692 jobs; less than 0.1%Warner Robins ROI: -263 jobs; 0.4%
Criterion 7: Crime Rate at Randolph higher than the national average. No other issues.Criterion 8: Environmental impediments may exist: historic properties, land use constraints, and T/E species.
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Buckley Annex, Denver, Colorado by relocating the Air Reserve Personnel Center to Randolph Air Force Base, Texas and consolidating it with the Air Force Personnel Center at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Realign Robins Air Force Base, Georgia by relocating Air Force Reserve Recruiting Service to Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
StrategyCOBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data VerificationMilitary Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG RecommendedCriteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGsDe-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
18
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
JB @ Andrews/WashingtonHSA-0012
GC-IM-0004
JB @ Anacostia/Bolling/NRLHSA-0013
GC-IM-0005
JB @ Myer/Henderson HallHSA-0014
GC-IM-0006
JB @ Elmendorf/RichardsonHSA-0015
GC-IM-0007
JB @ Pearl Harbor/HickamHSA-0016
GC-IM-0008
Consolidate Charleston AFB & NWS Charleston
HSA-0032GC-IM-0009
Joint Bases (JB)
Consolidations
Consolidate South Hampton Roads Installations
HSA-0034GC-IM-0012
Consolidate North Hampton Roads Installations
HSA-0033GC-IM-0013
Consolidate Lackland AFB, Ft. Sam Houston, & Randolph AFB
HSA-0017GC-IM-0014
JB @ Monmouth/Earle Colts NeckHSA-0075
GC-IM-0018
Installation Management
JB @ Dix/McGuire/LakehurstHSA-0011
GC-IM-0003
JB @ Bragg/PopeHSA-0009
GC-IM-0001
JB @ Dobbins/AtlantaHSA-0119
GC-IM-0019
JB @ Lewis/McChordLewis executive agent
HSA-0010GC-IM-0002
JB @ GuamHSA-0XXX
GC-IM-00XX
-
19
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
IM RECOMMENDATION ASSUMPTIONS
Recommendations are not prescriptive-ICC will establish implementation policyReal Property transfer not impliedBOS functional components not considered absolute-exceptions based on scenario specific situationsRange of projections for personnel reductions developed for each scenario-Low end used in recommendations sent in Scenario Data Call
-
20
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0011: Establish Joint BaseMcGuire-Dix-Lakehurst
Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scale.Good potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 262 positions and associated footprint)Establishes first tri-service joint base.Supports complementary missions of McGuire/Dix -mobility/power projection platform.Maximizes joint utilization of infrastructure
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
McGuire AFB - .206 Ft Dix - .201NAVAIRENGSTA Lakehurst - .136
Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne time costs: $11.3MNet Implementation savings: $90.3MAnnual Recurring savings: $22.3MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $290.7M
ImpactsCriterion 6:
Dix ROI: -182 (89 direct/ 93 indirect); less than 01%Lakehurst ROI: -284 (173 direct/111 indirect); less than 0.1%
Criterion 7: No issues regarding community infrastructure
Criterion 8: No known environmental impediments with this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Ft. Dix and Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to McGuire AFB, establishing Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration & Modernization for the new joint base.
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
21
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0009: Establish Joint Base Bragg-Pope
Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancies and creates economies of scalePotential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 84 positions and associated footprint)Supports complementary missions: power projection platform/mobilityMaximizes joint utilization of infrastructure
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
Ft Bragg - .538Pope AFB - .184
Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne Time Cost: $1.0MNet Implementation savings: $32.8MAnnual Recurring savings: $7.4MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings) $99.1M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -141 jobs (84direct/60 indirect);
Less than 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with
this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Pope AFB by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Ft. Bragg, establishing Joint Base Bragg-Pope. The U.S. Army will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization for the new joint base.
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
22
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0015: Establish Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson
Justification Military Value
Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 224 positions and associated footprint)Supports complementary missions: power projection platform/mobilityMaximizes joint utilization of infrastructure
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
Elmendorf AFB - .230Ft Richardson - .189
Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne time costs:: $7.7MNet Implementation savings: $78.9MAnnual Recurring savings: $19.0MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $249.5M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -412 jobs (224 direct/188 indirect); -0.16%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments
with this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Ft. Richardson by relocating the installation managementfunctions/responsibilities to Elmendorf AFB, establishing Joint Base Elmendorf/Richardson. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) for the new joint base.
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
23
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0012: Establish Joint Base Andrews-Washington
Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scale.Good potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 30 positions and associated footprint).Eliminates a base within a base and establishes single installation management responsibility for consolidated footprint
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
Andrews AFB - .222COMNAVDIST Washington - .342
Military judgment: Transfer of NAF installation management functions to Andrews AFB, will provide greatest overall military value to DoD
PaybackOne time costs: $496KNet Implementation savings: $6.3MAnnual Recurring savings: $1.5MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $19.7M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -30 jobs (18 direct/12 indirect); Less than 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with
this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Naval Air Facility Washington by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Andrews AFB, establishing Joint Base Andrews-Naval Air Facility Washington. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) for the new joint base.
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
24
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0013: Establish Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling-NRL
Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scale.Good potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 119 positions and associated footprint).Eliminates a base within a base Maximizes joint utilization of infrastructure
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
NAVDIS Washington (includes Anacostia and NRL). - .342Bolling AFB - .214
Fuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne time costs: $2.9MNet Implementation savings: $45.7MAnnual Recurring savings: $10.6MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $140.7M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -200 jobs (119 direct/81 indirect); Less than
0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with
this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Bolling AFB by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Naval District Washington at the Washington Navy Yard, establishing Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling-Naval Research Laboratory (NRL). The U.S. Navy will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) for this new joint base.
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
25
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0016: Establish Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam
Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 277 positions and associated footprint)Maximizes joint utilization of infrastructureMilitary value greater for Naval Station Pearl Harbor based on predominance and facilities efficiencies
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
NAVSTA Pearl Harbor - .395Hickam AFB - .229
Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne time costs: $6.3MNet Implementation savings: $123.2MAnnual Recurring savings: $28.3MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $376.3M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -510 jobs (277 direct/233 indirect);
Less than 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with
this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Hickam AFB by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Naval Station Pearl Harbor, establishing Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam. The U.S. Navy will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) for this new joint base.
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
26
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0075: Establish Joint Base Monmouth - Earle Colts Neck
Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 75 positions and associated footprint)Share military housing.Military value analysis greater for Monmouth based on size and PW efficiencies.
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
Ft Monmouth - .136WPNSTA Earle - .074
Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne time costs:: $1.6MNet Implementation savings: $29.4MAnnual Recurring savings: $6.8MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $90.7M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -126 jobs (75 direct/51 indirect)
Less than 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with
this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Naval Weapons Station Earle Colts Neck by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Ft. Monmouth and establish Joint Base Monmouth-Earle Colts. The U.S. Army will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) for this new joint base.
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
27
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0010: Establish Joint Base Lewis-McChord
Justification Military Value
Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scale. High potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 432 positions and associated footprint)Supports complementary missions: power projection platform/mobilityMaximizes joint utilization of infrastructure
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Valuemodel:
Ft Lewis - .355McChord AFB - .208
Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne Time Cost: $6.2MNet Implementation savings: $218.2MAnnual Recurring savings: $46.6MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $634.8M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -776 jobs (422 direct/354 indirect); -.23%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with
this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign McChord AFB by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Ft. Lewis, establishing Joint Base Lewis-McChord. The U.S. Army will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization for the new joint base.
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
28
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0032: Consolidate Charleston AFB and NAVWPNSTA Charleston
Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 264 positions and associated footprint)Military value analysis marginally higher for Charleston AFB based on larger operational mission
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
Charleston AFB - .186NAVWPNSTA Charleston - .184
Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne time costs:: $5.1MNet Implementation savings: $69.9MAnnual Recurring savings: $21.9MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $267.4M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -656 jobs (264 direct/392 indirect); -0.2%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with
this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Naval Weapons Station Charleston by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Charleston AFB, SC. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM).
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
29
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0017: Consolidate Lackland AFB, Ft Sam Houston and Randolph AFB
Justification Military Value Eliminates redundancy of installation management functions and creates economies of scale.Good potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 199 positions and associated footprint).Military value analysis greater for Air Force based on predominance and efficiency.Supports complementary missions: training
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
Lackland AFB - .296Ft Sam Houston - .233Randolph AFB - .205
Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne time costs: $5.1MNet Implementation savings: $63.3MAnnual Recurring savings: $15.081MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $198.4M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -382 jobs (189 direct/183 indirect)
Less than 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with
this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Ft. Sam Houston and Randolph AFB by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Lackland AFB. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM).
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
30
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0034: Consolidate South Hampton Roads Installations
Justification Military Value Installation management mission consolidation eliminates redundancy and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 21positions and associated footprint)Ft Storys small size and distance from Ft Eustis makes transfer to Navy ideal candidate for consolidation
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
Eustis - .247NAVSTA Norfolk .412
Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne time costs: $300KNet Implementation savings: $8.8MAnnual Recurring savings: $2.0MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $26.6M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -44 jobs (21 direct/23 indirect)
Less than 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with
this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Ft. Story by relocating the installation management functions/responsibilities to Commander Naval Mid-Atlantic Region. The U.S. Navy will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Supprt (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM).
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
31
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
HSA-0033: Consolidate North Hampton Roads Installations
Justification Military Value Eliminates redundancy of installation management functions and creates economies of scaleGood potential for personnel and footprint reductions (minimum of 217 positions and associated footprint)Military value analysis greater for Langley based on large population associated with operational mission and headquarters
Comparison of BASOPS missions using Military Value model:
Langley AFB - .249Ft Eustis - .247Ft Monroe - .110
Enhances jointnessFuses synergy-type efficiencies to maximize potential for cost reductions and improved services
PaybackOne time costs:: $6.3MNet Implementation savings: $67.5MAnnual Recurring savings: $16.3MPayback period: ImmediateNPV (savings): $213.8M
ImpactsCriterion 6: -501 jobs (217 direct/ indirect)
Less than 0.1%Criterion 7: No issues regarding community
infrastructureCriterion 8: No known environmental impediments with
this recommendation
Candidate Recommendation: Realign Ft. Eustis and Ft. Monroe by relocating the installationmanagement functions/responsibilities to Langley AFB. The U.S. Air Force will assume responsibility for all Base Operating Support (BOS) (with the exceptions of Health and Military Personnel Services) and the O&M portion of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM).
Strategy
COBRA
Capacity Analysis / Data Verification
Military Value Analysis / Data Verification
JCSG/MilDep Recommended
Criteria 6-8 Analysis
De-conflicted w/JCSGs
De-conflicted w/MilDeps
-
32
Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
IM Costs & Savings Summary
Scenario Gaining Service
One Time Cost ($M)
NPV Savings ($M)
SteadyState Savings
($M)
Army
Army
Monmouth/Earle Army 1.6 90.7 6.8
Hampton South Navy .3 26.6 2.0
NDW/Bolling Navy 2.9 140.7 10.6
Pearl/Hickam Navy 8.6 374.2 28.2
Andrews/NAF Air Force .5 19.7 1.5
Charleston Air Force 6.6 265.9 21.9
Elmendorf/Richardson Air Force 7.7 249.5 19.0
Hampton North Air Force 8.2 212.0 16.3
McGuire/Dix/Lakehurst Air Force 11.3 290.7 22.3
San Antonio Air Force 6.4 171.7 13.3
99.1
634.8
7.4
46.6
195.92575.6
1.0
6.2
61.3
Bragg/Pope
Lewis/McChord
Total
-
33Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Wedge Allocation
Objective: Determine process for allocating wedge dollars to recommendations
Two-Step Process Valuation: Value recommendations based on
attributes that reflect DoD priorities Allocation: Allocate funding based on valuation
-
34Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Valuation
Recommendations assessed against three attributes for wedge allocationWeights for each attribute should convey ISG/IEC prioritiesAttributes: Transformation and/or Jointness Costs and Savings Efficiency
-
35Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Valuation: Attributes Hierarchy
1. Transformation: Multi-service/Defense Agency consolidations, collocations, and ISG/IEC priorities.
2. Costs and Savings: Fiscal improvements.3. Efficiency: Decreases in DoD footprint.
Is this the right hierarchy?
-
36Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Transformation: Metrics Hierarchy
1. ISG/IEC priorities2. Consolidations3. Collocations
Multi-service/Defense Agency over Single Service within above hierarchy
Transformation
ISG/IEC priorities Consolidations Collocations
Multi-service/Defense Agency Single Service
Recommendation: Approve hierarchy
-
37Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Costs and Savings: Metrics Hierarchy
1. Net implementation savings 2. Payback period3. Net Present Value over 20 years
Costs and Savings
Net implementation savings Payback period NPV
Recommendation: Approve hierarchy
-
38Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Efficiency: Metrics Hierarchy
1. Square footage2. Acres
Efficiency
Square footage Acres
Recommendation: Approve hierarchy
-
39Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
Next Steps
Next ISG meeting 14 Jan 05 (1530-1700)
Continuation of Candidate Recommendations
Next IEC meeting 24 Jan 05 (1645-1730)
-
INDEX
Tab 1 Candidate Recommendations and Quad Charts
Tab 2 Supporting Documentation (disc 1) Tab 3 - Summary of Scenarios Registered Tab 4 New Conflicts Settled Tab 5 Old Conflicts Settled disc 2 Tab 6 Independent - disc 2 Tab 7 Enabling disc 2 Tab 8 Deleted disc 2 Tab 9 Not ready for Categorization disc 2
-
1Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
DRAFT
Scenarios Registered (Scenarios as of 23 Dec 04) DAS review 5 Jan 05)
1501574255641946Total
191224156Technical
21913245Supply & Storage
4244656Medical
34411Intel
1215355112125Industrial
2016287125HQs & Support Activities
72412658Ed & Training
26555490Air Force
811494162Navy & MC
306910118218Army
HoldDis-approved
ApprovedDeletedConflictEnablingIndepen-dent
Not Ready
TotalGroup
Candidate Recommendations
-
1Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
DRAFT
New Conflicts Settled
-
2Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
DRAFT
E&T-0060 - Columbus AFB
Proposed Resolution
n Continue with original scenario (E&T-0060)
Conflicts
n Doctrinal (E&T-0060)USAF objects to the consolidation of maintenance and flight training.
Scenarios Involved
n Establish Joint Strike Fighter Integrated Training Center at Columbus AFB, MS. Consolidate maintenance and flight training. (E&T-0060)
-
3Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
DRAFT
H&SA-0046 & USAF-0057 Offutt AFB
Proposed Resolutionn Continue with original scenarios
(H&SA-0046 & USAF-0057)n H&SA already has a scenario
(H&SA-0045) that uses another location. (H&SA-0046)
n USAF can continue with original scenario but the H&SA functions imbedded therein will be analyzed under the authority and over-watch of the H&SA JCSG.
Conflicts
n Facilities (H&SA-0046 & USAF-0057)
Scenarios Involvedn Consolidate DISA components at
Offutt AFB. Close 5 leased locations, realign 4 leased locations and other sites in the DC area. (H&SA-0046)
n Close Scott AFB and relocate Headquarters Air Mobility Command and US Transportation Command to Offutt AFB. (USAF-0057)
-
4Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
DRAFTH&SA-0101 & 0126, INT-0003, & 0007, & USA-0017, 0019, 0021, 0029, 0070, 0080, 0081, 0087, 0088, 0093,0097, 0098, 0100, 0101, 0102, 0103, 0105, 0138, 0146, 0148, 0153, 0154, 0160, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0169, 0171, 0176, 0177, 0181, 0182, 0200, & 0214 Various Locations (Purchased Land)
Scenarios Involvedn Close 2 United States Army Reserve (USAR) centers
(Middletown and Close the Beaumont, Port Arthur, Port Neches (includes the Port Neches Field Maintenance Site (FMS)), and Orange TXARNG facilities and #2 and #3 Houston USAR centers. Collocate these units in a new AFRC on a site TBD in the Northwest Houston area. (USA-0029)
n Close the Fayetteville, Springdale, Rogers and Bentonville Armories. Close the Pond United States Army Reserve Center. Construct a new Armed Forces Reserve Center on a site in NW Arkansas. (USA-0070)
n Close Finnel Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) and co-located Area Maintenance Support Activitiy (AMSA) #154, close 1 Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) facility and build a new facility. Affected units relocate to a new AFRC in Tuscaloosa, AL. (USA-0080)
n Close 2 United States Army Reserve (USAR) centers (Middletown and SGT George D. Libby) and 1 Area Maintenance Support Activity (AMSA 69) and the Connecticut Army National Guard (CTARNG) closes 3 Armories (Putnam, Manchester, and New Brittain) and the Newington VA Facility Lease. All affected units will move to a new 1200 man Tier II, Phase III Inter-Agency Site in Middletown, CT. (USA-0081)
Scenarios Involvedn Realign SOUTHCOM HQ by purchasing SOUTHCOM HQs
leased facility and land in Miami, FL. (H&SA-0101)n Realign JFCOM by purchasing JFCOM leased facility and
land in Suffolk, VA. (H&SA-0126)n Realign NGA functions within NRO facility, Westfields; by
relocating and consolidating to a new facility on commercially purchased real estate adjacent to the current NRO facility at Chantilly/Westfields, VA. (INT 0003)
n Consolidate Missouri based NGA St. Louis, MO, disestablishing all of the NGA functions currently performed in St Louis and consolidating the functions into a new facility on 80 acres at a location to be determined in southwest St. Louis. (INT 0006)
n Consolidate Missouri-Based NGA at Arnold, MO, into a new facility on commercially purchased real estate at Arnold, MO. (INT 0007)
n Close the Jonesboro Armory (includes an Organizational Maintenance Site (OMS)) and the Paragould Armory and the Jonesboro USARC. Construct a new AFRC/OMS in Jonesboro, AR. (USA-0017)
n Close the El Dorado Armory (ARARNG) and the Rufus N. Garrett Jr. El Dorado USARC, collocating the units into a new AFRC in El Dorado, AR. (USA-0019)
n Closes five ARNG armories, and two USAR centers. Realign two units from the MidWest City Readiness Center and construct a new AFRC/OMS in Oklahoma City, OK. (USA-0021)
-
5Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
DRAFTH&SA-0101 & 0126, INT-0003, & 0007, & USA-0017, 0019, 0021, 0029, 0070, 0080, 0081, 0087, 0088, 0093,0097, 0098, 0100, 0101, 0102, 0103, 0105, 0138, 0146, 0148, 0153, 0154, 0160, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0169, 0171, 0176, 0177, 0181, 0182, 0200, & 0214Various Locations (Purchased Land)
Scenarios Involvedn Close 1 Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) Armory
and 1 United States Army Reserve (USAR) Center in Huntsville and move the assigned units to a new facility to be built in Huntsville. Build a 40,800 square foot facility in vicinity of Huntsville, TX. (USA-0101)
n Close 3 Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) Armories (San Marcos, Seguin, New Braunfels) and 1 United States Army Reserve (USAR) Center in San Marcos and move assigned units to a new facility in San Marcos. (USA-0102)
n Close the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) Armories, realign the Marshall TXARNG Field maintenance activity (co-located at Marshall Armory) and close the Tyler and Marshall USAR Centers. Build a new AFRC in Tyler, TX. (USA-0103)
n Close the Courcelle Brothers United States Army Reserve Center with adjoining organizational maintenance activity, the Rutland ARNG Armory, and the Rutland USAR area maintenance support activity (leased) and constructs an Armed Forces Reserve Center and Support site in Rutland, VT. (USA-0105)
n Closes the Ludlow, N. Springfield, and Windsor ARNG centers. Closes USAR Chester Memorial and Berlin (terminates lease) Centers. Closes NRC in White River Jct. And consolidates into a new AFRC (JFRC White River Junction) in the White River Junction, VT area. (USA-0138)
Scenarios Involvedn Close a leased United States Army Reserve Centers (USARCs) in Cape
Girardeau and close 3 Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) Armories (Cape Girardeau, Jackson, and Charleston). All affected units will relocate to new Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) (USA-0087)
n 9th Regional Readiness Command and the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) will close existing United States Army Reserve (USAR) Center in Greentop (leased facility) and MOARNG Armory in Kirksville, Missouri and construct a new Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) in Kirksville. All affected units will relocate to this new facility. (USA-0088)
n Closes five Army Installation Status Report (ISR) RED state-owned facilities (Henryetta, Okemah, Stilwell, Muskogee, and Pryor Readiness Centers) and one ISR GREEN, under-utilized Federal facility (Muskogee). Create one Center (AFRC) in the Muskogee area. (USA-0093)
n Close Puerto Rico Army National Guard ( PRARNG) Center in Mayaguez and realign the Aguadilla-Ramey United States Army Reserve (USAR); construct a new center vicinity of Mayaguez, PR. (USA-0097)
n Closes 3 Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG Armories - Denton, Irving, and Denison) (1 leased) and 1 United States Army Reserve(USAR) Center in the Dallas area. Centers suffer acreage constraints and cannot be expanded. Build 89,000 square foot Center in the Lewisville, TX area. Location to be determined. Estimated land acquisition cost is $450,000 ($30,000 per acre; requirement is for 11.5 acres). (USA 0098)
n Close 2 Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) Armories (Lufkin and Nacogdoches), terminate lease of 1 USAR Center in Lufkin. Collocate all units assigned to those facilities to be constructed (a new 57,600 square foot facility) in vicinity of Lufkin, TX. (USA-0100)
-
6Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
DRAFT
Scenarios Involvedn Closes Truman Olson USARC in Madison, the G.F.
Oconnel USARC in Madison, Realigns Madison (Bowman) WIARNG Armory, the Madison WIARNG Armory (2400 Wright St) and the Madison WIARNG Armory (1420 Wright St.) (small units move out of existing centers but does not close them). Consolidates units into a newly constructed AFRC in Madison area with acreage identified next to the gate of the WIANG Base. (Not on the ANG Base) (USA-0200)
n Closes the Broken Arrow, Eufaula, Okmulgee, Tahlequa, Haskell, Muskogee, Stilwell, Cushing and Wagoner OKARNG Readiness Centers. Closes the OKARNG Okmulgee Field Maintenance Shop #14. Consolidate all units into a new AFRC in Broken Arrow. Potentially closes the NMCRC in Broken Arrow. (USA-0214)
Scenarios Involvedn Close the Adrian B. Rhodes AFRC in Wilmington, NC
which houses 2 USAR units and a USNR unit. Construct a new AFRC and OMS in Wilmington, NC. (USA-0171)
n Close Cedar Rapids AFRC (USAR and USNR) (current). Close Cedar Rapids ARNG Armory/Org Maintenance Shop and consolidate into a new AFRC in Cedar Rapids (USA-0176)
n Close Wilson Kramer USARC and consolidate with Navy and USMCR into a new AFRC in Allentown/Bethlehem, PA. (USA-0177)
n Close Amarillo Readiness Center/OMS #2, Hale County Airport Readiness Center, Pampa Readiness Center (TXARNG), Blucher Tharp USARC and NMRC Amarillo. Possible participation from NRC Lubbock. Consolidate into a new AFRC/OMS in Amarillo, TX (yet to be determined in the Amarillo area). (USA-0181) Close Bossier City and Shreveport USARCs and consolidate into an AFRC with NMCRC Shreveport (Proposes acquiring additional land next to the NMCRC and ADD/ALT the NMCRC to convert that facility to an AFRC. (USA-0182)
H&SA-0101 & 0126, INT-0003, & 0007, & USA-0017, 0019, 0021, 0029, 0070, 0080, 0081, 0087, 0088, 0093, 0097, 0098, 0100, 0101, 0102, 0103, 0105, 0138, 0146, 0148, 0153, 0154, 0160, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0169, 0171, 0176, 0177, 0181, 0182, 0200, & 0214 Various Locations (Purchased Land)
-
7Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
DRAFTH&SA-0101 & 0126, INT-0003, & 0007, & USA-0017, 0019, 0021, 0029, 0070, 0080, 0081, 0087, 0088, 0093, 0097, 0098, 0100, 0101, 0102, 0103, 0105, 0138, 0146, 0148, 0153, 0154, 0160, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0169, 0171, 0176, 0177, 0181, 0182, 0200, & 0214 Various Locations (Purchased Land)
Scenarios Involvedn Close Germantown Memorial and James W. Reese
USARCs and MCRC Folsom and consolidate into a new AFRC in Chester/Germantown area. (USA-0162)
n Closes Serenti USARC/OMS and Wilkes/BarreUSARC/OMS, Scranton PAARNG Armory, and MCRC Wyoming ( Forty Fort) and NRC in Avoca and consolidate all units into a new AFRC/OMS in Scranton, PA.( site to be determined). (USA-0163)
n Close MAJ Robert Kirkwood USARC in Newark, Close William Nelson ARNG Center in Newark and NMCRC Newark and consolidate into a new AFRC in Newark, DE. Encroached facilities due to urbanization. (USA-0164)
n Close 4 IAARNG installations (at Jefferson, Newton, Chariton, and Knoxville). Move all affected units to a new ARNG Readiness Center (New MILCON) (IAARNG is currently looking in Indianola area, but final location not identified yet). (USA-0169)
Scenarios Involvedn Close the Taylor and (51st St) TXARNG
Armories, the 51st St FMS, and the leased Round Rock USARC in Austin, TX. Construct a new, AFRC/FMS in Round Rock, TX. (USA-0146)
n Close Brownsville TXARNG Center, and Rathjen USAR Center in Brownsville, TX and Build a new AFRC (Brownsville) at a new site in Brownsville, TX. (USA-0148)
n Close LAARNG Baton Rouge Center / OMS #8 facility. Close USAR (Marvin J. Roberts USARC USAR owned land at Alonmaster, LA.) Close NMCRC and consolidate into a new AFRC/OMS (AFRC Baton Rouge) in Baton Rouge. (USA-0153)
n Close 1 MIARNG, Close NMCRC Grand Rapids (USNR goes to Fort Custer and USMCR goes to new AFRC in Grand Rapids) and construct a new AFRC in Grand Rapids Industrial Park near Gerald R. Ford Airport. (USA-0154)
n Closes Milwaukee ARNG Armory and OMS, and 1 NMCRC and consolidate in a new AFRC in Milwaukee. (USA-0160)
-
8Draft Deliberative Document For Discussion Purposes Only Do Not Release Under FOIA
DRAFTH&SA-0101 & 0126, INT-0003, & 0007, & USA-0017, 0019, 0021, 0029, 0070, 0080, 0081, 0087, 0088, 0093, 0097, 0098, 0100, 0101, 0102, 0103, 0105, 0138, 0146, 0148, 0153, 0154, 0160, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0169, 0171, 0176, 0177, 0181, 0182, 0200, & 0214 Various Locations (Purchased Land)
Proposed Resolution
n Requires heightened monitoring to ensure any resulting recommendation properly reflects contingencies.
Conflicts
n Other Availability of receiving location uncertain because DoD does not own/control the land. Requires purchase of land; availability and cost uncertain
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # E&T-0060
Scenario Title: Establish Joint Strike Fighter Integrated Training Center
Description:
Establish an Integrated Training Center at Columbus, MS for the Joint Strike Fighter Program. The intent is to consolidate maintenance and flight training for the Joint Strike Fighter.
Date Created: 12/21/2004
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
Columbus AFB (Columbus, MS) - Receive Joint Strike Fighter Integrated Training Center
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 231 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # HSA-0046
Scenario Title: MAH-MAH-0034 (Alt to MAH-0001): Consolidate DISA Components outside of DC Area
Description:
Close 5 leased locations and realign 4 leased locations, Arlington Service Center (Navy), and Ft. Belvoir by consolidating components of DISA at Offutt Air Force Base.
Justification/Impact:- Consolidation of HQ locations from 11 to 1 eliminates redundancy and enhances efficiency. - Encompasses 1.06 million GSF (or equivalent), as currently reported. Computed space required at 200 GSF/person = 754,200 GSF.- Eliminates 581,000 USF of leased space within the DC Area (726,000 GSF equiv). - 5 leased locations can be closed: approx. 555,000 USF.- Affects 4,714 personnel, as currently reported. Scenario estimates a 20% personnel savings as a result of consolidation, or 943 positions. - Enhances AT/FP- Relocates major tenant from Arlington Service Center and allows Navy to consider closing that installation. - Offutt AFB reports 26,986 GSF of vacant administrative space and sufficient land to accommodate 5.6 million GSF of new administrative space.- Scenario does not consolidate the following locations: Anacostia Annex, Chambersburg, and Mechanicsburg.
Date Created: 10/15/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
5600 Columbia Pike, Falls Church, VA (Falls Church, VA) - Close Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Arlington Service Center (Arlington, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Belvoir (Fort Belvoir, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Crystal Gateway 3; Arlington; VA (Arlington, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Fern Street Warehouse; Arlington; VA (Arlington, VA) - Close Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Hoffman 1; Alexandria; VA (Alexandria, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Joint Spectrum Center; Annapolis; MD (Annapolis, MD) - Close Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Northpoint Building; Sterling; VA (Sterling, VA) - Close Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Skyline Five; Falls Church; VA (Falls Church, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Skyline Four ; Falls Church; VA (Falls Church, VA) - Realignment Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Skyline Place (Skyline VII); Falls Church; VA (Falls Church, VA) - Close Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) - Consolidate
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
Offutt AFB (Bellevue, NE) - Receive Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)
DISA
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 280 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USAF-0057
Scenario Title: Close Scott AFB (S300)
Description:
Close Scott AFB. The 375th Airlift Wing will inactivated. The wings C-21 aircraft will be distributed to Andrews, Peterson, Wright-Patterson, and Randolph AFBs. The planned move of C-9 aircraft from Andrews to Scott will be cancelled. C-40 aircraft originally propgrammed for Scott willlbe redirected to Andrews. The 126th Air Refueling Wing will remain in its current location and operate from Mid America Airport. Headquarrters Air Mobility Command and United States Transportation Command will relocate to Offutt AFB, Nebraska.
Date Created: 12/17/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
Scott AFB (Belleville, IL) - Close 375th Airlift Wing - Inactivate
C-21 Airlift Squadron (14 PAA) - Relocate
KC-135R Tanker Squadron (12 PAA) - Relocate
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
Andrews AFB (Camp Springs, MD) - Receive C-21 Airlift Squadron (3 PAA)
Peterson AFB (Colorado Springs, CO) - Receive C-21 Airlift Squadron (2 PAA)
Randolph AFB (Universal City, TX) - Receive C-21 Airlift Squadron (6 PAA)
Scott AFB (Belleville, IL) - Receive KC-135R Tanker Squadron (12 PAA) to Mid-America Airport
Wright-Patterson AFB (Fairborn, OH) - Receive
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 1105 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # HSA-0101
Scenario Title: MAHCOCOMs0011: Realign SOUTHCOM HQ
Description:
Realign SOUTHCOM HQ by purchasing SOUTHCOM HQs leased facility and land in Miami, FL.Reduces leased space/costs for 239,714 GSF.Enhances AT/FP.In addition to utilizing main HQ building, MILCON will be required in order to move personnel (372) from satellite facilities onto main campus.
Date Created: 11/4/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
SOUTHCOM HQ. (Miami, FL) - OTHER SOUTHCOM HQ - Other
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
SOUTHCOM HQ. (Miami, FL) - Receive SOUTHCOM HQ
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 346 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # HSA-0126
Scenario Title: MAH-COCOMs-0015, Realign JFOCM Leased Facilities
Description:
Realign JFCOM by purchasing JFCOM leased facility and land in Suffolk, VA.
Reduces lease space/costs for 619,030 GSF.
Date Created: 12/17/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
JFCOM Leased Facilities (Suffolk, VA) - OTHER JFCOM Leased Facilities - Other
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
JFCOM Leased Facilities (Suffolk, VA) - Receive JFCOM Leased Facilities
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 374 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # INT-0003
Scenario Title: Consolidate NCR-Based NGA at Chantilly/ Westfields, VA
Description:
Realign NGA functions at Bethesda, MD (Sumner and Dalecarlia sites) named Erskine Hall, Emory Bldg, Maury Hall, Roberdeau Hall, Abert Hall, Ruth Bldg, Fremont Bldg, Motor Poll, and Warren Bldg; Close NGA functions at Reston, VA, named 1 and 2; Realign NGA functions at Newington, VA, named 8510, 8520 and 8530; Close NGA functions at Dulles, VA, named Dulles North (or its successor, Reston 3); Realign National Geospatial Intelligence College function at Ft Belvoir, VA, named Bldgs 211, 214, 215, and 220; Close NGA and NGIC functions in Bldg 213 at Southwest Federal Center, DC; Realign NGA functions within NRO facility, Westfields; by relocating and consolidating to a new facility on commercially purchased real estate adjacent to the current NRO facility at Chantilly/Westfields, VA.
This scenario disestablishes all of the functions currently performed at the NCR locations named above and consolidates the functions into a new facility on 150 acres adjacent to the current NRO facility at Westfields. The requirement for the 150 acres is due to vulnerability and security reasons.
Date Created: 10/4/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
Belvoir (Fort Belvoir, VA) - National Geospatial Intelligence College - Disestablish
Bethesda Facility (Sumner and Dalecarlia Sites) (Bethesda, MD) -
Dulles North (Reston, VA) -
Newington 1, 2, and 3 (Newington, VA) -
NRO Westfields (Chantilly, VA) -
Reston 1 and 2 (Reston, VA) -
Washington Navy Yard (Washington, DC) - Bldg 213 - Disestablish
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
Purchase land/facility at Chantilly/Westfields, VA (Chantilly, VA) - Receive
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 520 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # INT-0007
Scenario Title: Consolidate Select Missouri-Based NGA at Arnold, MO
Description:
Realign NGA functions at St. Louis 2d Street named Bldgs 05, 07, 12, 18, 20, 22, 25, 36, 37, and 39; by relocating and consolidating to a new facility on commercially purchased real estate at Arnold, MO.
This scenario disestablishes all of the NGA functions currently performed at the St. Louis area locations named above and consolidates the functions into a new facility on 80 acres at a location to be determined at Arnold, MO. The requirement for the 80 acres is due to vulnerability and security reasons.
The exact location for the new facility is classified.
Date Created: 10/22/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
St. Louis 2nd Street Facility (St. Louis, MO) -
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
Purchase land/facility at Arnold, MO (Arnold, MO) - Receive
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 524 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0017
Scenario Title: 24 AFRC Jonesboro AR
Description:
Closes the Jonesboro Armory (includes an Organizational Maintenance Site (OMS)) and close the Paragould Armory and the Jonesboro USARC. Construct a new AFRC/OMS in Jonesboro, AR.
Date Created: 9/23/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
JONESBORO ARMORY/OMS 01 (Jonesboro, AR) - Close CO A 875 EN - Relocate
CO A 875 EN Main - Relocate
HHC 875 EN - Relocate
OMS 01 - Relocate
W8AX21 OMS 01 (FTS) - Relocate
WP1YA0 875 EN BN CO A (AGR) - Relocate
WP1YT0 875 EN BN HHC (AGR) - Relocate
JONESBORO USARC (Jonesboro, AR) - Close DET 2 392 CM CO - Relocate
PARAGOULD ARMORY (PARAGOULD, AR) - Close CO C 875 EN - Relocate
WP1YC0 875 EN BN CO C (AGR) - Relocate
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
Jonesboro AR AFRC (Jonesboro, AR) - Receive CO A 875 EN
CO A 875 EN Main
CO C 875 EN
DET 2 392 CM CO
HHC 875 EN
OMS 01
W8AX21 OMS 01 (FTS)
WP1YA0 875 EN BN CO A (AGR)
WP1YC0 875 EN BN CO C (AGR)
WP1YT0 875 EN BN HHC (AGR)
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 754 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0019
Scenario Title: 28 AFRC El Dorado, AR
Description:
Close the El Dorado Armory (ARARNG) and the Rufus N. Garrett Jr. El Dorado USARC, collocating the units into a new AFRC in El Dorado, AR.
Date Created: 9/23/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
EL DORADO ARMORY (EL DORADO, AR) - Close CO A 3/153 IN - Relocate
WQN0A0 3/153 IN CO A (AGR) - Relocate
RUFUS N GARRETT JR USARC (EL DORADO, AR) - Close CO B 3/153 IN - Relocate
HHB 142 FA - Relocate
WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (AGR) - Relocate
WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (FTS) - Relocate
WQN0B0 3/153 IN CO B (AGR) - Relocate
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
EL DORADO AFRC (EL DORADO, AR) - Receive CO A 3/153 IN
CO B 3/153 IN
HHB 142 FA
WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (AGR)
WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (FTS)
WQN0A0 3/153 IN CO A (AGR)
WQN0B0 3/153 IN CO B (AGR)
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 756 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0021
Scenario Title: 92 AFRC Oklahoma City,OK
Description:
Closes five ARNG armories (Oaklahoma City Armoy (44th Street Readiness Center), Enid (includes FMS #10 in Enid), El Reno, Minco, and Pawnee (Pawnee is vacant.)); and two USAR centers (Perez and Krowse). Realigns two units from the MidWest City Readiness Center. Construct a new AFRC/OMS in Oklahoma City, OK.
Date Created: 9/23/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
BILLY A KROWSE USARC (OKLAHOMA CITY, OK) - Close WZLR99 290 4 BDE LANES (AGR) - Relocate
2/290 IN - Relocate
3/290 BN (CSS FE) 4BDE75DI - Relocate
3/290 IN - Relocate
353 EN - Relocate
PCS STUDENTS-BILLET LOAD (SCHOOL CODE F615) - Relocate
TEAM 2 2 JA - Relocate
SMSO ( OK ) - Relocate
RDT OFFICE 90 2 - Relocate
TEAM 6 2 JA - Relocate
WRJUAA 353 EN GP HHC (AGR) - Relocate
WRJUAA 353 EN GP HHC (FTS) - Relocate
WZLQ99 2/290 4 BDE AUG CS-FE (FTS) - Relocate
WZLQ99 2/290 4 BDE CS-FE (AGR) - Relocate
WZLR99 290 4 BDE AUG LANES (FTS) - Relocate
2/290 BN (CS FE)4BDE75DIV - Relocate
EL RENO ARMORY (EL RENO, OK) - Close BTRY C 1/160 FA - Relocate
WPS7C0 1/160 FA BTY C (AGR) - Relocate
WPS7C0 1/160 FA BTY C (FTS) - Relocate
ENID ARMORY/OMS 10 (Enid, OK) - Close 1345 TC DET 1 - Relocate
45 FA - Relocate
OMS 10 - Relocate
W8A860 OMS 10 (FTS) - Relocate
WPS3T2 120 EN BN HSC DET 2 (AGR) - Relocate
WPSWAA 45 FA BDE HHB (AGR) - Relocate
WXB7A1 1345 TC CO DET 1 (AGR) - Relocate
MANUEL A PEREZ JR USARC (OKLAHOMA CITY, OK) - Close 2291 SEC 3 - Relocate
ENV PROT SPEC - Relocate
RTD OFFICE 90 1 - Relocate
W8KL03 2291 USA HSP SEC 3 (AGR) - Relocate
W8KL03 2291 USA HSP SEC 3 (FTS) - Relocate
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 760 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004MidWest City Readiness Center (Oklahoma City, OK) - Realignment MidWest City Armory - Realignment
MidWest City Armory1 - Realignment
MidWest City Armory2 - Realignment
MidWest City Armory3 - Realignment
MidWest City Armory4 - Realignment
MINCO ARMORY (MINCO, OK) - Close CO A DET 1 1/179 IN - Relocate
WPS9A1 1/179 IN CO A DET 1 (AGR) - Relocate
OAKLAHOMA CITY ARMORY (OAKLAHOMA CITY, OK) - Close CO A 1/179 IN - Relocate
CO C 1/179 IN - Relocate
WPS9A0 1/179 IN CO A (AGR) - Relocate
WPS9C0 1/179 IN CO C (AGR) - Relocate
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
OAKLAHOMA CITY, OK AFRC (OAKLAHOMA CITY, OK) - Receive CO A 1/179 IN
2/290 BN (CS FE)4BDE75DIV
2/290 IN
2291 SEC 3
3/290 BN (CSS FE) 4BDE75DI
3/290 IN
353 EN
BTRY C 1/160 FA
TEAM 6 2 JA
WZLR99 290 4 BDE AUG LANES (FTS)
1345 TC DET 1
CO C 1/179 IN
ENV PROT SPEC
OMS 10
PCS STUDENTS-BILLET LOAD (SCHOOL CODE F615)
RDT OFFICE 90 2
RTD OFFICE 90 1
45 FA
SMSO ( OK )
WZLR99 290 4 BDE LANES (AGR)
W8A860 OMS 10 (FTS)
W8KL03 2291 USA HSP SEC 3 (AGR)
W8KL03 2291 USA HSP SEC 3 (FTS)
WPS3T2 120 EN BN HSC DET 2 (AGR)
WPS7C0 1/160 FA BTY C (AGR)
WPS7C0 1/160 FA BTY C (FTS)
CO A DET 1 1/179 IN
WPS9A1 1/179 IN CO A DET 1 (AGR)
WPS9A0 1/179 IN CO A (AGR)
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 761 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004WPSWAA 45 FA BDE HHB (AGR)
WRJUAA 353 EN GP HHC (AGR)
WRJUAA 353 EN GP HHC (FTS)
WXB7A1 1345 TC CO DET 1 (AGR)
WZLQ99 2/290 4 BDE AUG CS-FE (FTS)
WZLQ99 2/290 4 BDE CS-FE (AGR)
WPS9C0 1/179 IN CO C (AGR)
TEAM 2 2 JA
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 762 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0029
Scenario Title: 196 AFRC NW Houston,TX
Description:
Close the Beaumont, Port Arthur, Port Neches (includes the Port Neches Field Maintenance Site (FMS)), and Orange TXARNG facilities and #2 and #3 Houston USAR centers. Collocate these units in a new AFRC on a site TBD in the Northwest Houston area.
Date Created: 9/23/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
BEAUMONT READINESS CENTER (BEAUMONT, TX) - Close CIV EMPLOYEES 1 - Relocate
HHB 1/133 FA - Relocate
HQ 1/133 FA - Relocate
WYQXT0 1/133 FA HHB (AGR) - Relocate
HOUSTON USARC 2 (L) (HOUSTON, TX) - Close WVN4AA 340 CM CO (FTS) - Relocate
327 CO SMOKE/DECON (D) - Relocate
340 CO SMOKE/DECON (D) - Relocate
449 EN - Relocate
808 EN CO PIPELINE CONST - Relocate
HHD 450 CHEM BN - Relocate
RTD OFFICE 1 - Relocate
TEAM 1463 EN - Relocate
TEAM 2 463 EN - Relocate
TEAM 3 463 EN - Relocate
TEAM 4 463 EN - Relocate
TEAM 7 463 EN - Relocate
TEAM 6 463 EN - Relocate
TEAM 5 463 EN - Relocate
TM FFTG HQ 463 EN - Relocate
WRZZAA 463 EN TM (AGR) - Relocate
WRZZAA 463 EN TM (FTS) - Relocate
WS50AA 808 EN CO (AGR) - Relocate
WS50AA 808 EN CO (FTS) - Relocate
WV3WAA 450 CM BN HHD (AGR) - Relocate
WV3WAA 450 CM BN HHD (FTS) - Relocate
WVJUAA 327 CM CO (AGR) - Relocate
WVJUAA 327 CM CO (FTS) - Relocate
WVN4AA 340 CM CO (AGR) - Relocate
337 EN - Relocate
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 773 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004HOUSTON USARC 3/AMSA 73 (G) (HOUSTON, TX) - Close 31 TC DET FRT CONS/DISTR - Relocate
369 TC TM TERM SUPER DET - Relocate
453 TC - Relocate
614 TC DET AUTO CGO DOC - Relocate
651 TC DET HARBORMASTER - Relocate
HHC 348 BN TERMINAL - Relocate
RTD OFFICE 2 - Relocate
TEAM 4, 1 JA - Relocate
WSQ6AA 369 TC DET (FTS) - Relocate
WSYRAA 348 TC BN HHC (AGR) - Relocate
WSYRAA 348 TC BN HHC (FTS) - Relocate
WZPRAA 453 TC CO (AGR) - Relocate
WZPRAA 453 TC CO (FTS) - Relocate
WZPWAA 614 TC DET (FTS) - Relocate
WZZXAA 651 TC DET (FTS) - Relocate
ORANGE READINESS CENTER (ORANGE, TX) - Close SVC BTRY 1/133 FA - Relocate
WYQXS0 1/133 FA SVC BTY (AGR) - Relocate
PORT ARTHUR READINESS CENTER (PORT ARTHUR, TX) - Close BTRY B 1/133 FA - Relocate
WYQXB0 1/133 FA CO B (AGR) - Relocate
PORT NECHES READINESS CENTER/OMS 26 (PORT NECHES, TX) - Close OMS 26 - Relocate
SVC BTRY DET 1 1/133 FA - Relocate
W8BB46 OMS 26 (FTS) - Relocate
WYQXS1 1/133 FA SVC BTY DET 1 (AGR) - Relocate
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
AFRC NORTHWEST HOUSTON (HOUSTON, TX) - Receive HHC 348 BN TERMINAL
HHB 1/133 FA
327 CO SMOKE/DECON (D)
340 CO SMOKE/DECON (D)
369 TC TM TERM SUPER DET
449 EN
453 TC
614 TC DET AUTO CGO DOC
651 TC DET HARBORMASTER
808 EN CO PIPELINE CONST
BTRY B 1/133 FA
HHD 450 CHEM BN
TEAM 5 463 EN
WV3WAA 450 CM BN HHD (AGR)
TEAM 4, 1 JA
HQ 1/133 FA
OMS 26
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 774 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004RTD OFFICE 1
RTD OFFICE 2
SVC BTRY 1/133 FA
SVC BTRY DET 1 1/133 FA
TEAM 1463 EN
TEAM 2 463 EN
TEAM 3 463 EN
337 EN
CIV EMPLOYEES 1
WV3WAA 450 CM BN HHD (FTS)
TEAM 6 463 EN
TEAM 7 463 EN
TM FFTG HQ 463 EN
W8BB46 OMS 26 (FTS)
WRZZAA 463 EN TM (AGR)
WRZZAA 463 EN TM (FTS)
WS50AA 808 EN CO (AGR)
WS50AA 808 EN CO (FTS)
WSQ6AA 369 TC DET (FTS)
WSYRAA 348 TC BN HHC (AGR)
31 TC DET FRT CONS/DISTR
WZZXAA 651 TC DET (FTS)
WVJUAA 327 CM CO (AGR)
TEAM 4 463 EN
WVJUAA 327 CM CO (FTS)
WVN4AA 340 CM CO (AGR)
WVN4AA 340 CM CO (FTS)
WYQXB0 1/133 FA CO B (AGR)
WYQXS0 1/133 FA SVC BTY (AGR)
WYQXS1 1/133 FA SVC BTY DET 1 (AGR)
WYQXT0 1/133 FA HHB (AGR)
WZPRAA 453 TC CO (AGR)
WZPRAA 453 TC CO (FTS)
WZPWAA 614 TC DET (FTS)
WSYRAA 348 TC BN HHC (FTS)
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 775 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0070
Scenario Title: 29 AFRC NW ARK AR
Description:
Close the Fayetteville, Springdale, Rogers and Bentonville Armories. Close the Pond United States Army Reserve Center. Construct a new Armed Forces Reserve Center on a site in NW Arkansas including a 7300 sf multi-purpose instructional facility which could be used as a barracks during mobilization.
Date Created: 10/1/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
BENTONVILLE ARMORY (BENTONVILLE, AR) - Close 1/142 BTRY A - Relocate
WP39A0 1/142 FA BTY A (AGR) - Relocate
FAYETTEVILLE AR ARMORY (FAYETTEVILLE, AR) - Close HQ 142 FA BDE - Relocate
WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (AGR) - Relocate
WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (FTS) - Relocate
LEROY R POND USARC (FAYETTEVILLE, AR) - Close 362 - Relocate
362 PO - Relocate
489 EN BN CO C DET 1 - Relocate
90th RRC RTD OFFICE - Relocate
CM - Relocate
WNEAR1 CM CO USAR ELE (FTS) - Relocate
WNEAR1 CM CO USAR ELE 1 (AGR) - Relocate
WRKCC2 489 EN BN CO C DET 1 (FTS) - Relocate
WSQWAA 0362 PO CO (AGR) - Relocate
WSQWAA 0362 PO CO (FTS) - Relocate
ROGERS ARMORY (ROGERS, AR) - Close 1/142 BTRY C - Relocate
WP39C0 1/142 FA BTY C (AGR) - Relocate
SPRINGDALE ARMORY (SPRINGDALE, AR) - Close 1/142 FA BTRY B - Relocate
WP39B0 1/142 FA BTY B (AGR) - Relocate
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
AFRC NW ARK (NW Arkansas, AR) - Receive WSQWAA 0362 PO CO (FTS)
1/142 BTRY C
1/142 FA BTRY B
362
362 PO
489 EN BN CO C DET 1
90th RRC RTD OFFICE
CM
WNEAR1 CM CO USAR ELE 1 (AGR)
WNEAR1 CM CO USAR ELE (FTS)
HQ 142 FA BDE
WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (AGR)
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 832 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004WP2RAA 142 FA BDE HHB (FTS)
WP39A0 1/142 FA BTY A (AGR)
WP39B0 1/142 FA BTY B (AGR)
WP39C0 1/142 FA BTY C (AGR)
WRKCC2 489 EN BN CO C DET 1 (FTS)
WSQWAA 0362 PO CO (AGR)
1/142 BTRY A
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 833 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0080
Scenario Title: 31 AFRC Tuscaloosa, AL
Description:
Close Finnel Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) and co-located Area Maintenance Support Activitiy (AMSA) #154, close 1 Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) facility and build a new facility. Affected units relocate to a new AFRC in Tuscaloosa, AL.
Date Created: 10/7/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
FINNELL AFRC (Tuscaloosa, AL) - Close 75th HSP COMBAT SPT (EAC) - Relocate
75th MD HUB - Relocate
AMSA 154 G TUSCALOOSA (FTS) - Relocate
NAVAL RESERVE UNIT - Relocate
WSBCT0 75 MD HSP HUB (AGR) - Relocate
WSBCT0 75 MD HSP HUB (FTS) - Relocate
POWELL-SHAMBLIN ARMORY (Northport, AL) - Close 31 CM AUG HHC BDE - Relocate
HHC 122 CM CHEM BDE - Relocate
WPS5AA 0031 CM BN HHD (AGR) - Relocate
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
AFRC Tuscaloosa, AL (Tuscaloosa, AL) - Receive 31 CM AUG HHC BDE
75th HSP COMBAT SPT (EAC)
75th MD HUB
AMSA 154 G TUSCALOOSA (FTS)
HHC 122 CM CHEM BDE
NAVAL RESERVE UNIT
WPS5AA 0031 CM BN HHD (AGR)
WSBCT0 75 MD HSP HUB (AGR)
WSBCT0 75 MD HSP HUB (FTS)
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 843 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0081
Scenario Title: 20 AFRC Middletown, CT
Description:
Close 2 United States Army Reserve (USAR) centers (Middletown and SGT George D. Libby) and 1 Area Maintenance Support Activity (AMSA 69) and the Connecticut Army National Guard (CTARNG) closes 3 Armories (Putnam, Manchester, and New Brittain) and the Newington VA Facility Lease. All affected units will move to a new 1200 man Tier II, Phase III Inter-Agency Site in Middletown, CT.
Date Created: 10/7/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
MANCHESTER ARMORY (MANCHESTER, CT) - Close 1/102 IN CO B - Relocate
MANCHESTER ARMORY CUSTODIAN - Relocate
WP5GB0 1/102 IN CO B (AGR) - Relocate
WP5GB0 1/102 IN CO B (FTS) - Relocate
MIDDLETOWN USARC (MIDDLETOWN, CT) - Close HQ, 1205 TC BN - Relocate
W7TSAA 1205 USA RAILWAY SVC BN (FTS) - Relocate
MiILFORD, CT AMSA 69 (G) (MiILFORD, CT) - Close AMSA 69 MILFORD CT (FTS) - Relocate
NEW BRITAIN ARMORY (NEW BRITAIN, CT) - Close 141 MD - Relocate
CO A, 1/102 IN - Relocate
NEW BRITAIN ARMORY CUSTODIAN - Relocate
STATE OF CT MARSHALLS - Relocate
WP5GA0 1/102 IN CO A (AGR) - Relocate
WP5GA0 1/102 IN CO A (FTS) - Relocate
WP90AA 141 MD CO (AGR) - Relocate
NEWINGTON ARMORY (NEWINGTON, CT) - Close 103 QM - Relocate
11 MP - Relocate
118 MD - Relocate
119 MP - Relocate
143 CS - Relocate
HSC, 118 MD - Relocate
WPG8AA 143 ASG HHC (AGR) - Relocate
WPG8AA 143 ASG HHC (FTS) - Relocate
WQBCAA 118 MD BN (FTS) - Relocate
WQBCT0 118 MD BN HSC (AGR) - Relocate
WQBCT0 118 MD BN HSC (FTS) - Relocate
PUTNAM ARMORY (PUTNAM, CT) - Close 250 EN - Relocate
PUTNAM ARMORY CUSTODIAN - Relocate
WP8YAA 250 EN CO (AGR) - Relocate
WP8YAA 250 EN CO (FTS) - Relocate
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 844 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004SSG GEORGE D LIBBY USARC (NEW HAVEN, CT) - Close 3414 - Relocate
3423 - Relocate
344 MP CO GUARD - Relocate
395 CS - Relocate
439 QM CO PETRO SUPP LUPS - Relocate
WQ3EAA 439 QM CO (AGR) - Relocate
WQ3EAA 439 QM CO (FTS) - Relocate
WQ3KAA 395 QM BN HHD (AGR) - Relocate
WQ3KAA 395 QM BN HHD (FTS) - Relocate
WSKYAA 344 MP CO (AGR) - Relocate
WSKYAA 344 MP CO (FTS) - Relocate
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
AFRC MIDDLETOWN (MIDDLETOWN, CT) - Receive 344 MP CO GUARD
3423
11 MP
118 MD
119 MP
141 MD
143 CS
250 EN
395 CS
STATE OF CT MARSHALLS
WPG8AA 143 ASG HHC (AGR)
PUTNAM ARMORY CUSTODIAN
439 QM CO PETRO SUPP LUPS
AMSA 69 MILFORD CT (FTS)
CO A, 1/102 IN
HQ, 1205 TC BN
HSC, 118 MD
MANCHESTER ARMORY CUSTODIAN
1/102 IN CO B
3414
WPG8AA 143 ASG HHC (FTS)
W7TSAA 1205 USA RAILWAY SVC BN (FTS)
WP5GA0 1/102 IN CO A (AGR)
WP5GA0 1/102 IN CO A (FTS)
WP5GB0 1/102 IN CO B (AGR)
WP5GB0 1/102 IN CO B (FTS)
WP8YAA 250 EN CO (AGR)
WP8YAA 250 EN CO (FTS)
103 QM
WSKYAA 344 MP CO (FTS)
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 845 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004WQ3EAA 439 QM CO (AGR)
NEW BRITAIN ARMORY CUSTODIAN
WQ3EAA 439 QM CO (FTS)
WQ3KAA 395 QM BN HHD (AGR)
WQ3KAA 395 QM BN HHD (FTS)
WQBCAA 118 MD BN (FTS)
WQBCT0 118 MD BN HSC (AGR)
WQBCT0 118 MD BN HSC (FTS)
WSKYAA 344 MP CO (AGR)
WP90AA 141 MD CO (AGR)
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 846 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0087
Scenario Title: 201 AFRC Cape Girardeau, MO
Description:
Close a leased United States Army Reserve Centers (USARCs) in Cape Girardeau and close 3 Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) Armories (Cape Girardeau, Jackson, and Charleston). All affected units will relocate to new Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC).
Date Created: 10/7/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
CAPE GIRARDEAU ARMORY/OMS 03 (CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO) - Close
CAPE GIRARDEAU USARC (CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO) - Close
CHARLESTON MO ARMORY (CHARLESTON, MO) - Close
JACKSON MO ARMORY (JACKSON, MO) - Close
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
AFRC CAPE GIRARDEAU (CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO) - Receive
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 853 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0088
Scenario Title: 207 AFRC Kirksville, MO
Description:
9th Regional Readiness Command and the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) will close existing United States Army Reserve (USAR) Center in Greentop (leased facility) and MOARNG Armory in Kirksville, Missouri and construct a new Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) in Kirksville. All affected units will relocate to this new facility.
Date Created: 10/7/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
GREENTOP USARC (GREENTOP, MO) - Close
KIRKSVILLE ARMORY (KIRKSVILLE, MO) - Close
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
AFRC KIRKSVILLE (KIRKSVILLE, MO) - Receive
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 854 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0093
Scenario Title: 99 AFRC Muskogee,OK
Description:
Closes five Army Installation Status Report (ISR) RED state-owned facilities (Henryetta, Okemah, Stilwell, Muskogee, and Pryor Readiness Centers) and one ISR GREEN, under-utilized Federal facility (Muskogee). Creates one 59,000 square foot Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) with a 7300 square foot Multi-use bldg on a site to be determined in the Muskogee area.
Date Created: 10/8/2004
Losing Bases Losing Activities
ALTON M ASHWORTH USARC (MUSKOGEE, OK) - Close
ARMORY/WHITAKER TRAINING (MUSKOGEE, OK) - Close
HENRYETTA ARMORY (HENRYETTA, OK) - Close
MUSKOGEE ARMORY (MUSKOGEE, OK) - Close
OKEMAH ARMORY (OKEMAH, OK) - Close
STILWELL ARMORY (STILWELL, OK) - Close
Receiving Bases Activities being Received
MUSKOGEE AFRC (MUSKOGEE, OK) - Receive
Monday, January 03, 2005 Page 859 of 1138
Draft Deliberative Document-For Discussion Purposes Only-Do Not Release Under FOIA
-
Registered Scenarios As Of: 12/23/2004Scenario # USA-0097
Scenario Title: 227 AFRC Mayaguez, PR
Description:
Close the fo