brand health of dove

Product and Brand Management:

Submitted By:

Meghna Singh- u108085

Sujit Sahoo- u108111

Swaroop Kumar Kar- u108112

Uday Bhanu Satpathy- u108116

1


Project- Stage 1

Submitted To:

Prof. S. Govindrajan

u108112

u108116


2

Contents

Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3

History and Evolution of Dove ...................................................................................................................... 3

Instrument of Data Collection....................................................................................................................... 5

Brand Asset Valuator Model (An adaption from Young & Rubicam BAV Model) .................................... 5

Laddering .................................................................................................................................................. 7

Findings and Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 8

Brand Asset Valuator Model ..................................................................................................................... 8

Laddering ................................................................................................................................................ 13

References .................................................................................................................................................. 20

3

Executive Summary

With increase in disposable incomes, growth in rural demand is expected to increase because

consumers are moving up towards premium products. Dove is positioned as premium soap in

India. This Report aims at measuring the Brand Image of Dove. This Report tracks the brand

image of Dove with two approaches a) Quantative Research b) Qualitative Research. The Project

uses a suitable adaption of Young & Rubicam’s Brand Asset Valuator model for Quantative

Research and uses the Laddering method for Qualitative Research. With the help of Quantative

Research, the project aims to find a quantify intangible pillars of Brand Dove like

Differentiation, Relevance, Knowledge and Esteem. The BAV Model gives scores on the four

pillars which demonstrate potential for Dove. The BAV Model scores of three Brands have been

taken to compare the position of Brand Dove Vis-a Vis other Brands like Garnier and Nestle.

The Power Grid shows the Brands health and momentum. The BAV Model findings and

implications can be used for developing Brand strategies and tactics.

Laddering as a qualitative research technique helps identify the core values that individual

customers may associate with a brand and thus help in constructing a brand personality that the

customers can identify with. The report gives a HVM (Hierarchical Value Map of Premium Soap

Category, which was obtained by the laddering method. Content Analysis and Implication

Matrix summary have also been covered in the report. Self Esteem and Self Worth are the most

significant core values of respondents, and confidence is one of the key consequences of using

premium soap.

History and Evolution of Dove

Dove is a personal care brand owned by Unilever. It was launched by Unilever in 1957 in US,

years after Unilever acquired soap factory De Duif in The Netherlands, from which the brand

name Dove is derived. Dove has been available in India since 1995. Dove's logo is a silhouette

profile of a dove, the colour of which often varies. Dove's products include:

antiperspirants/deodorants, body washes, beauty bars, lotions/moisturizers, hair care and facial

care products.

4

Dove has grown from a US-only soap bar into one of Unilever’s biggest global brands. It is now

the world's #1 cleansing brand, and #3 in the Anglo-Dutch company's portfolio behind Knorr and

Lipton. During the 1990s, the group began to extend the brand across the complete personal care

spectrum, and Dove now encompasses a wide range of products from bar soap to shower gel, and

from deodorants to shampoo-conditioners.

Its mantra is that it provides a refreshingly real alternative for women who recognise that beauty

is not simply about how you look, it is about how you feel. Dove has been positioned throughout

its history without referring to it as "soap", but as a "beauty bar" with one-fourth cleansing

cream; they stress its moisturizing of skin while washing in contrast to the drying effects of

regular soaps (which their advertising calls simply "soap"). Advertisements reinforced the

message by showing the cream being poured into the beauty bar. In 1979, the phrase "cleansing

cream" was replaced with "moisturizer cream". In 1979, a Pennsylvania dermatologist showed

that Dove dried and irritated skin significantly less than ordinary soaps. As a result of this study,

Unilever started aggressive marketing and won more than 24% of the market by 2003.

Dove has attracted widespread media attention since 2004 for its marketing. That year, Ogilvy &

Mather launched a series of ads for Dove portraying the "real beauty" of ordinary women. The

brand competes fiercely with Procter & Gamble's Olay, Beiersdorf’s Nivea and Johnson &

Johnson's Neutrogena, all of which have a similarly broad product range. In 2006, Dove started

the Dove Self-Esteem Fund. It purports to be "an agent of change to educate and inspire girls on

a wider definition of beauty and to make them feel more confident about themselves". To this

end, Dove created a number of largely online-only short films, including Daughters,

Evolution, Onslaught and Amy. Dove's ‘Campaign for Real Beauty’ was praised by people in

the advertising world, as well as from real consumers for representing something different to the

typical fashion advertising. By focusing on the distorted perception of beauty that much of the

fashion industry is guilty of promoting, Dove successfully separated its brand from that category

and made it stand for something different and something real. The early part of the campaign

was mainly driven by TV ads, and billboard ads featuring their "real" models. Later, Dove used

social media, using it to drive even more interest online in the central theme behind the entire

campaign. One of the most popular videos on YouTube right now is Dove's Evolution of

Beauty, a video also posted on their website.

5

Dove has evolved from functional brand to a brand with a point of view after Unilever

designated it as a masterbrand, and expanded its portfolio to cover entries into a number of

sectors beyond the original bath soap category. The development caused the brand team to take a

fresh look at the cliches of the beauty industry. The result was the controversial Real Beauty

campaign. As the campaign unfolded, Unilever learnt to use the Internet, and particularly social

network media like YouTube, to manage controversy.

Instrument of Data Collection

Brand Asset Valuator Model (An adaption from Young & Rubicam BAV Model)

Brand Asset Valuator suggests that brands are built in a very specific progression of four

consumer perceptions: Differentiation, Relevance, Esteem and Knowledge.

Differentiation = Distinctiveness (margin opportunity)

Relevance = Appropriateness (broad appeal)

Esteem= Reputation & Respect (retain customers)

Knowledge= Depth of Understanding (affinity with the brand)

We have used three sets of standard questionnaire (20 Questions each) for three Brands. A

standard structured questionnaire has been used since the Young & Rubicam method adaption is

a quantative one and cannot be open ended which will bring in subjectivity in the model.

1) Dove ( our chosen brand )

2) Garnier

3) Nestle

Methodology: A quantitative survey was conducted for all the three brands (Dove, Garnier and

Nestle) separately among a homogenous population (students at XIM).

Sample Size for Dove Survey: 61

Sample Size for Garnier Survey: 48

Sample Size for Survey: 46

6

Assumptions

1) Since the population for the survey is homogenous, each respondent has equal probability

of being in the sample of survey.

2) The reason for floating three independent surveys instead of a single survey was that, (

for example if a respondent gives the highest preference for dove on a particular attribute,

that is strongly agree , he will be cognitively driven not to mark the same response for

another brand say Garnier. However otherwise in the same population (which is uniform)

another respondent might just give the highest preference for Garnier. So our objective

was to avoid a sample which prefers one brand and is biased towards the other brands,

just because he wants to mark a different response to the other brand. Also there is a

tendency to mark at random when three questions are asked at the same time. This

tendency is slightly reduced when the respondent is exposed to just one brand at a time.

We have chosen 5 attributes each to measure the four pillars of BAV. From the 48 attributes used

by Young and Rubicam, the group zeroed in on 5 attributes each (that is 20 attributes in all), our

group could identify (with to that pillar) with most certainty. The following tables give the break

up.

Relevance

1 Good Value

2 Authenticity

3 High Performance

4 More Value

5 Association

Differentiation

1 Distinct

2 Innovation

3 Unique

4 Different

5 Original

7

Esteem

1 Reliable

2 Gaining In Popularity

3 Trustworthy

4 Prestigious brand

5 High Quality

Knowledge

1 Down to Earth

2 Simplicity

3 Tradition

4 Socially responsible

5 Healthy

Laddering

Laddering is an interview technique that leads to identification of core values of the respondents

and the corresponding attributes and consequences due to which the respondents use this

attribute. Laddering is a method that helps you elicit the higher or lower level abstractions of the

concepts that people use to organize their world. The laddering interview technique is an

unstructured approach. The informants become reflective and elicit what is important to them

and why. Laddering techniques involve creating, reviewing and modifying of hierarchical

knowledge, often in the form of ladders (i.e. tree diagrams).

Why is Laddering better than Aaaker’s Brand Personality Model?

1) Cannot be used to observe motives, attitudes or intentions and can lead to ambiguous or

at times misleading results

2) Since the respondent may not be sure of what some attributes mean, there is a possibility

of them being missed out which does not happen in case of laddering.

3) Laddering helps in synthesizing the core of the brand resulting in the visual

representation of the brand’s central characteristics

4) Today competition is not just limited to product category and Aaker’s model is limited to

a product category. This is a thing of past and is myopic in its approach.

8

5) Aaker’s model does not give an insight into consumer behavior.

The type of laddering used is Preference Consumption Differences. The questions were based on

the differentiation with second best preferred brand. In case of absence of this, the questions

focussed on the attributes due to which respondents use this brand. The identification of the

major attributes led to their consequences and the underlying values.

Findings and Conclusion

Brand Asset Valuator Model

Results and Analysis

The average scores for Brand Dove on all four pillars (out of 25) are

Differentiation 19.02

Relevance 18.11

Knowledge 15.21

Esteem 20.18

9

Differentiation > Relevance

Since differentiation is greater than relevance, the brand has potential to grow. The brand has the

power to build relevance. However as the data suggests there is not a huge difference between

differentiation of the vis –a-vis the relevance of the brand. Differentiation is the engine that pulls

the brand train. Differentiation is critical in the successful development and maintenance of a

brand. Combination of Differentiation and Relevance forms Brand Strength. Since

Differentiation and Relevance for Brand Dove is almost same, Brand Strength is high, which

implies Brand Dove can exist in the market as a viable entry. High Brand Strength allows the

brand to both defend itself from competition and generate margin, earnings and economic value.

19.02

18.11

17.60

17.80

18.00

18.20

18.40

18.60

18.80

19.00

19.20

Differentiation Relevance

Dove Brand Strength

Brand Strength

10

Esteem > Knowledge

A healthy sign for Brand Dove is absorbed, as the Esteem score for Brand Dove is significantly

higher than knowledge. Brand Dove is better liked than known. Customers would like to know

Brand Dove better. Esteem relates to how well a brand fulfills its implied or overtly stated

consumer promise. It doesn’t occur without Differentiation and Relevance having preceded it,

but it can outlive those Pillars by many years. The combination of Esteem and Knowledge forms

Brand Stature. The combination of Esteem and Knowledge is slightly lower, which implies the

brand pervasiveness in the market is low.

15.21

20.18

0

5

10

15

20

25

Knowledge Esteem

Dove Brand Stature

Dove Brand Stature

11

Dove has the highest Esteem score out of the the four pillars. The perceived quality and

consumer perceptions about dove are good and its popularity is growing. The brand is keeping its

promises. The consumer's response to a marketer's brand-building activity is driven by his

perception of two factors: quality and popularity, both of which vary by country and culture,

which in case of Dove is high in case of Dove indicating good health of the Brand.

Differentiation score of dove is the next highest. The brand stands apart from its competitors is

unique in its offering. Brand health is built and maintained by offering a set of differentiating

promises to consumers and delivering those promises to leverage value.

19.0218.11

15.21

20.18

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

Differentiation Relevance Knowledge Esteem

4 Pillars Of BAV

4 Pillars Of BAV

12

POWER GRID

From the consumer survey, it was found out that the values for relevance and knowledge are

much lower with respect to differentiation and esteem.

Calculation of Brand strength (Differentiation & Relevance) and brand stature (Esteem &

Knowledge)

• Brand Strength = Mean of (Product of Differentiation & Relevance scores of each

respondent) converted to a scale of 100 by diving by the maximum score possible

• Brand Stature = Mean of (Product of Esteem & Knowledge scores of each respondent)

converted to a scale of 100 by diving by the maximum score possible

13

• Dove comes in a zone which shows that it is beginning to exit from leadership stage and

is slightly moving towards the declining stage. Its strength and stature scores are both

above 50%. The decline can probably be attributed to low scores in knowledge. Even

though the score for relevance is low, the brand strength has been carried largely through

its differentiation. As a recommendation, relevance scores can be increased by showing

more value to the customer and strengthening the identity of brand Dove.

• A competitor in the same category as Dove is Garnier. Garnier is in a zone which is

called the New zone. It means that it has only begun to create differentiation in the

market and has started pulling customers towards its relevance. It needs to build on its

esteem and differentiation to move on to upper zones.

• A different category FMCG brand is Nestle. Across the surveyed consumers, Nestle was

found to occupy a major position in terms of strength and stature. It possesses high

esteem and high relevance scores.

Laddering

Results and Analysis

The responses were analyzed to form Attribute-Consequence-Value chains for all the

respondents. The similar attributes, consequences and values were grouped together. These

ACVs were and organized to form the following table. Some of the entities were derived from

sub entities which are specified below.

Attributes Sub Attributes

1 Smell Fragrance, Lightness

2 Gentle Light Colour, Soft Feel , Texture

3 No Harmful Chemicals

4 Moisturising

5 Premium Product Packaging, Ads, Price

6 Acts as a conditioner

14

Consequences

7 Confidence Professionalism

8 Healthy

No Harmful Effect on Skin,

Healthy Skin

9 Feel Good Factor

10 Good Looking Glow on the Skin

11 Better Personality

12 Convenience

No extra moisturiser, Low

consumption of Time

13 Value For Money Superior Value

14 Sophistication

15 Indulgence

16 Show off

17 Perception Tidyness, Unkempt, Grooming

18 Long Term benefits

Values

19 Self Esteem Respect, Dignity, Acceptance

20 Individuality Independence, Distinction

21 Self Worth Accomplishment

22 Security Sincerity, Security

The serial numbers of the ACVs from the table were taken as the codes for further analysis. The

ACVs were transformed to the following

15

Raw Data for Dove Analysis

Respondents Attribute Consequence --> Values

Depth�� 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 4 9 8 18 22 0 0

2 2 10 15 11 16 19 0

3 5 14 15 20 0 0 0

4 6 12 13 21 0 0 0

5 3 8 9 17 7 19 0

6 2 8 7 14 17 19 0

7 4 10 11 17 7 19 0

8 5 14 15 7 11 16 20

9 1 9 7 19 0 0 0

10 2 10 11 17 19 0 0

11 6 12 13 21 0 0 0

12 3 8 9 11 17 7 19

13 2 10 17 21 0 0 0

14 2 8 7 17 21 0 0

15 4 9 7 19 0 0 0

16

Summary Implication Matrix

The cutoff value for the HVM matrix was taken was 2 as it was the most common value in the

Implication matrix. Using this and the data from the Implication table the ladder was built.

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

1 Smell 1 1

2 Gentle 2 3 2

3 No Harmful Chems 2 3

4 Moisturising 2 1 4

5 Premium Product 2 5

6 Acts as a conditioner 2 6

7 Confidence 1 1 5 7

8 Healthy 2 2 1 8

9 Feel Good Factor 2 1 1 1 9

10 Good Looking 2 1 1 10

11 Better Personality 2 3 11

12 Conveniece 2 12

13 Value For Money 2 13

14 Sophistication 2 1 14

15 Indulgence 1 1 1 15

16 Show off 1 1 16

17 Perception 2 1 2 17

18 Long Term benefits 1 18

19 Self Esteem 19

20 Indivuality 20

21 Self Worth 21

22 Security 22

17

• Self Esteem emerged as the core value for most of the respondents. It was followed by

self worth and Individualism.

• The consequence that mattered the most was Confidence. In fact it led to both Self

Esteem and Self Worth. It was supported by consequences like feeling good, external

perception and looking good.

• Respondents who see confidence as a consequence of using the products see Gentleness,

Lack of harmful chemicals and Moisturizer were the product attributes that drove it.

• The conditioning attribute was seen as a value for money proposition by some users at it

led to saving of time and effort from using other conditioners which led to Self Worth as

a core value.

• Consumers who viewed premiumness of the soap took it as a reflection of their level of

sophistication. This led to the satisfaction of their core value that was Individualism.

• A few respondents felt a sense of security from the long term benefits promised and

perceived from the brand.

18

Conclusions

1) Segmentation:

Ladder Frequencies for Attribute - Value Linkage

Attribute

Value

Social Achievement

Self Esteem Security Total Self Worth Individuality Total

Smell 1 0 1 0 0 0

Gentle 3 0 3 2 0 2

No Harmful

Chemicals

2 0 2 0 0 0

Moisturising 2 1 3 0 0 0

Premium

Product

0 0 0 0 2 2

Acts as a

conditioner

0 0 0 2 0 2

9 6

The four values have been classified to higher level values as follows:

Social: Self Esteem and Security- These two values are more to do with social standing of a

person as to how a person is seen in the society.

19

Personal: Self worth and individuality- These two values relate a person to oneself as to how a

person stands upto his/ her expectations. Self worth is inclusive of acceptance of oneself and

dignity.

From the ladder frequencies for attribute- value linkage, the results are as follows:

Social- 9 respondents i.e. 60% respondents

Personal- 6 respondents i.e. 40% respondents

It is evident that this range of products and this brand is more applicable to people who are

conscious about their social values and worth in the eyes of others.

2) Developing Advertising Strategy:

Means- Ends Conceptualization of Components of Advertising Strategy:

Driving Force- The value orientation for the brand needs to be social values. It is important to

note that the values that are derived from maximum respondents are self esteem and self worth.

So, we can conclude that this range of products cater to an inherent need in a person to feel

confident about himself/herself. This leads to a person seeing that he/she is accepted in the

society and people perception about that person is positive.

Leverage Point- The value which has to be reinforced by the ads is Self Esteem as this is the

value exhibited by the maximum number of respondents.

Executional Framework- Since the brand is perceived to be a premium one and one which has a

sophisticated imagery, the tone and style of the advertisement should reflect the same. The

consequences and benefits should be put subtlety so that the viewer is tasked with interpreting

them. This comes from the HVM which depicts varied benefits perceived by the users.

Consumer Benefit- Confidence is the clear winner when it comes to consumer consequence. The

underlying consequences leading to this are external perception, feeling of goodness and looking

good. Hence one or more of these consequences need to be emphasised visually in the

advertisements. The coherent theme which needs to be communicated verbally is Confidence.

20

Message Elements- What emerges from the Hierarchical Value Model is the importance of

confidence in the four major values – Self Esteem, Self Worth, Individuality and Security. The

product attributes which leads to the consequence of Confidence are gentleness, absence of

harmful chemicals and moisturising property. These product attributes need to be highlighted in

the advertisements to induce the need for confidence among the viewers.

References

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dove_(brand)

• http://www.campaignforrealbeauty.com/supports.asp?section=campaign&id=93

• http://www.adbrands.net/us/dove_us.htm

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_(advertisement)

• http://rohitbhargava.typepad.com/weblog/2006/10/doves_evolution.html

brand health of dove

Documents