brian tomina, bar no. 255386 5900 wilshire blvd., suite ... · falsely claim to provide increased...
TRANSCRIPT
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BRIAN TOMINA, Bar No. 255386 5900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2600 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Telephone: (248) 327-6556 Facsimile: (248) 436-3385 [email protected] www.legalactionnow.com Other Attorneys listed in signature line Attorneys for Plaintiff Stephanie Hirmez, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHANIE HIRMEZ, Case No. Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
v. 1.VIOLATIONS OF
BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 17200 ET SEQ.
GNC HOLDINGS, INC.; GENERAL NUTRITION CORP, 2. VIOLATIONS OF d/b/a/ GNC; and CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE GENERAL NUTRITION CENTERS, INC.; SECTION 1750 ET SEQ. Defendants. 3. VIOLATIONS OF THE
FALSE ADVERTISING LAW, CALIFORNIA
'13CV1828 JMABEN
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 1 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 17500 ET SEQ.
4. BREACH OF EXPRESS
WARRANTY
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
_______________________________________/
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
NOW COMES Plaintiff STEPHANIE HIRMEZ, (“Plaintiff”), by and
through her attorneys OLIVER LAW GROUP, P.C., individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated, alleges the following:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is a civil class action brought individually by Plaintiff and on behalf of
a class of persons similarly situated, (“Class Members”), who purchased the
dietary supplements GNC Pro Performance Rapid Drive Arginine 5000, L-
Arginine 5000, L-Arginine 1000 and L-Arginine 500 (collectively referred
to as the “Products”).
2. The class members are all persons located within the state of California and
the United States who purchased the Products.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 2 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. Defendants advertise, manufacture, market, sell and distribute the Products,
as well as many other dietary and sports supplements to allegedly promote
health and increase athletic performance.
4. The Products are generally categorized as Nitric Oxide products which
falsely claim to provide increased formation of Nitric Oxide in the blood,
maintain blood vessel tone, increase circulation of oxygen and nutrients,
enhance athletic performance, increase lean muscle mass, and provide
muscle “pumps”.
5. L-Arginine is an amino acid found naturally in the body and is known to
metabolize into Nitric Oxide (NO). Once this NO is formed in the body it
plays a critical role in expanding blood vessels, thus increasing blood flow.
Defendants incorrectly base their labeling and marketing claims on the
assumption that because naturally produced L-Arginine effects blood flow,
that when supplemented orally, L-Arginine will produce the same results.
6. As referenced throughout Plaintiff’s Complaint, L-Arginine oral
supplementation does not produce the same results. Instead, it has been
found numerous times in reliable scientific studies that L-Arginine
supplements, when taken orally, only increase plasma arginine levels and do
not metabolize into NO or induce vasodilation (blood flow).
7. Nitric Oxide products are a growing and substantial segment of the sports
(bodybuilding) supplement segment of the dietary supplement market.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 3 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8. Defendants have complete control and authority over the labeling and
marketing language used for the Products.
9. By Defendants’ unfair, deceptive, fraudulent, unfair and misleading
practices, Plaintiff and Class Members have been unfairly deceived into
purchasing the Products.
10. Plaintiff brings this action challenging Defendants’ claims relating to the
Products on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, under
California’s Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, Consumer
Legal Remedies Act, Breach of Express Warranty, and Unjust Enrichment.
11. Plaintiff seeks an order compelling Defendants to (1) cease marketing the
Products using the misleading tactics complained of herein, (2) conduct a
corrective advertising campaign, (3) restore the amounts by which
Defendants have been unjustly enriched, and (4) destroy all misleading and
deceptive materials.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
12. This Court has jurisdiction over all causes of action asserted herein.
13. Jurisdiction is proper in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), because
there are at least 100 Class Members in the proposed Class, the combined
claims of proposed Class Members exceed $5,000,000 exclusive of interest
and costs, and at least one Class Member is a citizen of a state other than
Defendants’ state of citizenship.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 4 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14. Plaintiff will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity
for further investigation or discovery regarding Defendants’ sales of the
Products during the class period.
15. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a) because a substantial part
of the events giving rise to the claims asserted herein occurred in this
District. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c) because
Defendants conduct substantial business in this District, have sufficient
minimum contacts with this District, and otherwise purposely avail
themselves of the markets in this District, through the promotion, sale, and
marketing of their Products in this District.
16. Defendants and other out-of-state participants can be brought before this
Court pursuant to state and federal law.
THE PARTIES
17. During the Class period, Plaintiff and Class Members purchased the Product
through Defendants’ website and/or several different GNC brick/mortar
retail outlets throughout California and the United States. Plaintiff and Class
Members suffered an injury in fact caused by the false, fraudulent, unfair,
deceptive and misleading practices set forth in this Complaint.
18. Plaintiff Hirmez is a resident of the County of San Diego, State of
California, and the events set forth in this Complaint took place therein,
who, on or about May, 2013, purchased the product GNC Pro Performance
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 5 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Rapid Drive Arginine 5000 (“Product”) for her own use, and not for resale,
from the GNC retail outlet store 01809 located at 78-670 Hwy 111, La
Quinta, CA 92263.
19. GNC Holdings, Inc. is a Pennsylvania Corporation operating in California
with a principal place of business at 300 Sixth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15222.
20. General Nutrition Corporation, doing business as GNC, is a Pennsylvania
Corporation operating in California with a principal place of business at 300
Sixth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15222.
21. General Nutrition Centers, Inc. is a Pennsylvania Corporation operating in
California with a principal place of business at 300 Sixth Ave., Pittsburgh,
PA 15222.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
22. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if fully restated herein.
23. Plaintiff reviewed the Product’s label, as well as Defendants’ website prior
to purchasing the Product from the GNC retail store referenced above.
24. Plaintiff reasonably relied on the information provided by Defendants when
making the decision to purchase the Product.
25. Defendants’ claims are false and misleading.
26. Defendants market the product GNC Pro Performance RapidDrive Arginine
5000 towards athletes or people involved in fitness activities.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 6 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
27. Defendants had access, but knowingly and/or recklessly ignored all
competent and reliable scientific evidence regarding the Products.
28. The sole ingredient in the Products, which is at issue regarding the false,
misleading, unfair and deceptive claims, is L-Arginine (“Arginine”).
29. This compound is allegedly supposed to induce the release of nitric oxide
into the blood, however, it does not.
30. Nitric oxide is a gaseous signaling molecule known to contribute to the
control of vascular tone, and is considered to play a role in the vasodilatation
of muscle resistance vessels during exercise.
31. Muscle “Pump” refers to increased blood flow to the muscles, which in turn
is supposed to increase the size of the muscles.
32. “NOS” refers to nitric oxide.
33. L-arginine (2-amino-5-guanidino-pentanoic acid) is a conditionally-
essential, proteinogenic amino acid and a natural constituent of dietary
proteins.
34. L-arginine-enhanced vasodilation and blood flow to working muscles during
resistance exercise is alleged to provide an even greater impetus for
increasing muscle strength and hypertrophy than exercise alone.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 7 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
35. However, it has been shown that L-arginine supplementation does not
increase muscle blood flow1.
36. Presently, there are several studies involving an L-arginine-based approach
to increase circulating nitric oxide in humans; however, none of the studies
have demonstrated any positive results that would justify the claims made by
Defendants.
37. Defendants make the following false, fraudulent, misleading, and deceptive
label claims regarding the Products:
1 See Tang J, Lysecki P, Manolakos J, Tarnopolsky M, Phillips S. Bolus arginine
supplementation affects neither muscle blood flow nor muscle protein synthesis
in young men at rest or after resistance exercise. Journal of Nutrition, 141:195-
200, 2011; See also Willoughby DS, Boucher T, Reid J, Skelton G, Clark M.
Effects of 7 days of arginine-alpha-ketoglutarate supplementation on blood flow,
plasma L-arginine, nitric oxide metabolites, and asymmetric dimethyl arginine
after resistance exercise. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise
Metabolism, 21:291-99, 2011.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 8 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
“Maximized Nitric Oxide Production with Premium, Micronized Arginine”
“Arginine is an essential precursor of nitric oxide which helps maintain blood
vessel tone.”
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 9 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
“Essential precursor to nitric oxide”
“Helps maintain blood vessel tone”
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 10 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
38. Defendants use the following false, fraudulent, misleading, unfair and
deceptive claims at the point of purchase for the Product GNC Pro
Performance Rapid Drive Arginine 5000 on their website www.gnc.com
(Exhibit A):
a) “Maximizes N.O. Production and Nutrient Delivery”;
b) “Fuels Muscle Pumps and Blood Flow”; and
c) “Arginine is a crucial part of the nitric oxide pathway which helps to
maintain blood vessel tone”.
Defendants’ Claims Regarding the Product’s Ability to Produce Nitric Oxide, Induce Vasodilation and Increase Blood Flow
39. A number of studies have been conducted on L-arginine and L-arginine-
containing supplements to assess the effectiveness in which they increase the
levels of nitric oxide in the blood.
40. It should be noted that nitric oxide is very difficult to measure in circulation
due to its relative instability and short half-life.
41. Therefore, the metabolites nitrate and nitrite (NOX) are most often
measured.
42. The available published data on this issue has clearly indicated that these so-
called nitric oxide inducing supplements which contain Arginine are
ineffective in inducing increases in circulating nitric oxide.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 11 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
43. For example, a single oral dose of Arginine provided at 0.1 gram/kg was in
ineffective at increasing NOX in the blood2.
44. Arginine provided orally at 6 g/day for three days was shown to have no
effect on plasma NOX metabolite levels in well-trained male athletes3.
45. More specifically, it has been shown that alleged “nitric oxide inducing”
supplements were ineffective at increasing circulating NOX levels and
muscle tissue oxygenation in response to resistance exercise4.
2 Tsai PH, Tang TK, Juang CL, Chen KW, Chi CA, Hsu MC. Effects of arginine
supplementation on post-exercise metabolic responses. Chinese Journal of
Physiology, 52:136-42, 2009.
3 Liu T, Wu C, Chiang C, Lo Y, Tseng H, Chang C. No effect of short-term
arginine supplementation on nitric oxide production, metabolism and
performance in intermittent exercise in athletes. Journal of Nutritional
Biochemistry, 20:462-68, 2009.
4 See Bloomer RJ, Williams SA, Canale RE, Farney TM, Kabir MM. Acute effect
of nitric oxide supplement on blood nitrate/nitrite and hemodynamic variables in
resistance trained men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24:2587-
92, 2010.; See also Bloomer R, Farney T, Trepanowski J, McCarthy C, Canale R,
Schilling B. Comparison of pre-workout nitric oxide stimulating dietary
supplements on skeletal muscle oxygen saturation, blood nitrate/nitrite, lipid
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 12 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
46. Additionally, the provision of 12 grams/day of Arginine for seven days
significantly increased plasma Arginine levels but had no significant effect
on circulating NOX or blood flow, either at rest or in response to resistance
exercise5.
47. Based on this premise, hemodynamic function (heart rate and blood
pressure) would increase to justify the increased blood flow, ultimately
improving cardiovascular function.
48. In a study examining the effects of acute Arginine supplementation and
resistance exercise on arterial function in young men, there was no
significant change in blood flow and hemodynamic and vascular responses
peroxidation, and upper body exercise performance in resistance training men.
Journal of the International Society of Sport Nutrition, 7:16-30, 2010.
5 Willoughby DS, Boucher T, Reid J, Skelton G, Clark M. Effects of 7 days of
arginine-alpha-ketoglutarate supplementation on blood flow, plasma L-arginine,
nitric oxide metabolites, and asymmetric dimethyl arginine after resistance
exercise. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism,
21:291-99, 2011.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 13 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
when 7 grams of L-arginine was given immediately before resistance
exercise6.
49. It has been shown that single doses of alleged “nitric oxide inducing”
supplements were ineffective at increasing blood flow in response to
resistance exercise7.
50. It has also been shown that 6 grams of L-arginine delivered either
intravenously or orally8 and 12 grams/day for 7 days9 did not result in any
significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, or cardiac output.
6 Fahs C, Heffernan K, Fernhall B. Hemodynamic and vascular response to
resistance exercise with L-arginine. Medicine and Science in Sports and
Exercise, 41:773-79, 2009.
7 See Bloomer RJ, Williams SA, Canale RE, Farney TM, Kabir MM. Acute effect
of nitric oxide supplement on blood nitrate/nitrite and hemodynamic variables in
resistance trained men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24:2587-
92, 2010.; See also Bloomer R, Farney T, Trepanowski J, McCarthy C, Canale R,
Schilling B. Comparison of pre-workout nitric oxide stimulating dietary
supplements on skeletal muscle oxygen saturation, blood nitrate/nitrite, lipid
peroxidation, and upper body exercise performance in resistance training men.
Journal of the International Society of Sport Nutrition, 7:16-30, 2010.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 14 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
51. In assessing the effects of high (5.7 grams) and low (2.8 grams) doses of L-
arginine supplementation for 4 weeks in endurance-trained male athletes,
there was no improvement in physical performance as measured by run time
to exhaustion10.
52. In addition, no improvement in the time required to run 31 km was observed
after 14 days of Arginine supplementation at a dose of 15 grams/day11.
8 Bode-Boger S, Boger R, Galland A, Tsikas D, Frolich J. L-arginine-induced
vasodilation in healthy humans: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic
relationship. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 46:489-97, 1998.
9 Willoughby DS, Boucher T, Reid J, Skelton G, Clark M. Effects of 7 days of
arginine-alpha-ketoglutarate supplementation on blood flow, plasma L-arginine,
nitric oxide metabolites, and asymmetric dimethyl arginine after resistance
exercise. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism,
21:291-99, 2011.
10 Abel T, Knechtle B, Perret C, Esser P, von Arx P, Knecht H. Influence of
chronic supplementation of arginine aspartate in endurance athletes on
performance and substrate metabolism - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled study. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 26:344-49, 2005.
11 Colombani PC, Bitzi R, Frey-Rindova P, Frey W, Arnold M, Langhans W,
Wrenk C. Chronic arginine aspartate supplementation in runners reduces total
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 15 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Conclusion
53. Arginine supplementation, at the levels present in the Products and at the
recommended doses, have been shown to be ineffective at increasing
circulation of nitric oxide, causing vasodilatation and increasing blood flow.
54. Plaintiff and the Classes paid more for the Products, and would have been
unwilling to purchase the Products at all, absent the false and misleading
labeling complained of herein. Plaintiff and the Classes would not have
purchased the Products absent these claims and advertisements.
55. For these reasons, the Products were worth less, if it is worth anything at all,
than what Plaintiff and Classes paid for them.
56. Instead of receiving a product that had actual and substantiated healthful or
other beneficial qualities, the Products Plaintiff and the Classes received
were ones that did not provide any of the claimed benefits.
57. Plaintiff and the Classes lost money as a result of Defendants’ deceptive
claims and practices in that she did not receive what they paid for when
purchasing the Product.
58. Plaintiff and the Classes altered their position to their detriment and suffered
damages in an amount equal to the amount they paid for the Product.
plasma amino acid level at rest and during a marathon run. European Journal of
Nutrition, 38:263-70, 1999.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 16 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
59. In sum, Defendants’ claims regarding the Products are false and misleading,
arbitrarily chosen to deceive Plaintiff and Class Members into purchasing
otherwise useless and valueless products.
CLASS ALLEGATIONS
60. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if fully restated herein.
61. Plaintiff brings this action on their own behalf and as a Class Action
Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff seeks
certification of the following Classes:
California Class: All Persons in the State of California who have spent money purchasing the Products from Defendants from four years from the first-filed complaint in this action until the final disposition of this and any and all related cases. National Class: All Persons in the United States who have spent money purchasing the Products from Defendants from four years from the first-filed complaint in this action until the final disposition of this and any and all related cases.
62. The abundance of Class Members renders joinder of all Class members
individually, in one action or otherwise, impractical.
63. This action involves questions of law and fact common to Plaintiff and Class
Members including:
(a) Whether Defendants violated the California Civil Code Section 1750 et
seq.;
(b) Whether Defendants violated the California Business & Professions Code
Section 17200 et seq.;
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 17 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(c) Whether Defendants violated the False Advertising Law, Cal. Bus. &
Prof. Code Section 17500 et seq.;
(d) Whether Defendants breached an express warranty; and
(e) Whether Plaintiff and Class Members sustained damages and, if so, the
proper measure of damages, restitution, equitable or other relief, and the
amount and nature of such relief.
Excluded from the Classes are: (a) any Judge or Magistrate presiding over this
action and members of their families; (b) Defendants and any entity in which
Defendants have a controlling interest or which has a controlling interest in
Defendants and its legal representatives, assigns and successors of Defendants; and
(c) all persons who properly execute and file a timely request for exclusion from
the Classes.
64. Numerosity: The Classes are composed of thousands of persons
geographically dispersed throughout the State of California and Nationwide,
the joinder of whom in one action is impractical. Moreover, upon
information and belief, the Classes are ascertainable and identifiable from
Defendants’ records.
65. Commonality: Questions of law and fact common to the Classes exist as to
all members of the Class and predominate over any questions affecting only
individual members of the Classes. These common legal and factual issues
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 18 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
include, but are not limited to the following:
(a) Whether Defendants violated the California Civil Code Section 1750 et
seq.;
(b) Whether Defendants violated the California Business & Professions Code
Section 17200 et seq.;
(c) Whether Defendants violated the False Advertising Law, Cal. Bus. &
Prof. Code Section 17500 et seq.;
(d) Whether Defendants breached an express warranty; and
(e) Whether Plaintiff and Class Members sustained damages and, if so, the
proper measure of damages, restitution, equitable or other relief, and the
amount and nature of such relief.
66. Typicality: Plaintiff’s claims are typical of the claims of the members of the
Classes, as all such claims arise out of Defendants’ conduct in
manufacturing, marketing, advertising, warranting and selling the Products,
Defendants’ conduct in concealing material facts regarding the Products,
Defendants’ false, fraudulent, unfair and misleading claims and Plaintiff’s
and Class Members’ purchasing of the Products.
67. Adequate Representation: Plaintiff will fairly and adequately protect the
interests of the members of the Classes and have no interests antagonistic to
those of the Class. Plaintiff has retained counsel experienced in the
prosecution of complex class actions, including consumer class actions
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 19 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
involving false and misleading advertising, product liability and product
design defects.
68. Predominance and Superiority: This class action is appropriate for
certification because questions of law and fact common to the members of
the Classes predominate over questions affecting only individual members,
and a Class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and
efficient adjudication of this controversy, since individual joinder of all
members of the Classes is impracticable. Should individual Class Members
be required to bring separate actions, this Court and Courts throughout
California and the United States would be confronted with a multiplicity of
lawsuits burdening the court system while also creating the risk of
inconsistent rulings and contradictory judgments. In contrast to proceeding
on a case-by-case basis, in which inconsistent results will magnify the delay
and expense to all parties and the court system, this class action presents far
fewer management difficulties while providing unitary adjudication,
economies of scale and comprehensive supervision by a single Court.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 20 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CHOICE OF LAW California’s Substantive Law Applies to the Nationwide Class
69. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if fully restated herein.
70. California’s substantive laws apply to the proposed National Class, as set
forth in this complaint, because Plaintiff properly brings this action in this
District. A United States District Court sitting in diversity presumptively
applies the substantive law of the State in which it sits.
71. The Court may constitutionally apply California’s substantive laws to
Plaintiff and Class Members’ claims under the Due Process Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment, § 1, and the Full Faith and Credit Clause, Art. IV, §
1, of the United States Constitution. The claims asserted by Plaintiff contain
significant contact, or significant aggregation of contacts, to ensure an
adequate state interest and supports the choice of California state law as just
and reasonable.
72. Defendants conduct substantial business in California providing California
with an interest in regulating Defendants’ conduct under California laws.
Defendants’ decision to regularly conduct business and headquarter
themselves in California and avail themselves of California’s laws render the
application of California law to the claims at hand constitutionally
permissible.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 21 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
73. The injury to the Plaintiff and a significant number of proposed Class
Members by virtue of the misconduct alleged, occurred in California.
Plaintiff resides in California and purchased Defendants’ Product in
California.
74. The application of California’s laws to the proposed Class Members is also
appropriate under California’s choice of law rules because California has
significant contacts to the claims of the Plaintiff and the Class Members.
CAUSES OF ACTION COUNT I
Violations of California Business and Professions Code § 17200 et seq.
(On Behalf of Plaintiff and the Classes Against Defendants) 75. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if fully restated herein.
76. Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 prohibits any “unlawful, unfair or
fraudulent business act or practice.”
77. The acts, omissions, misrepresentations, practices, and non-disclosures of
Defendants as alleged herein constitute “unlawful” business acts and
practices in that Defendants’ conduct violates the False Advertising Law and
the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.
78. Defendants’ conduct is further “unlawful” because it violates the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and its implementing regulations in at least
the following ways:
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 22 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(1) Defendants’ deceptive statements violate 21 U.S.C. § 343(a), which
deems food (including nutritional supplements) misbranded when the
label contains a statement that is “false or misleading in any particular”;
(2) Defendants’ deceptive statements violate 21 C.F.R. § 101.14(b)(3(i),
which mandates “substances” in dietary supplements consumed must
contribute and retain “nutritional value” as defined under 21 C.F.R. §
101.14(a)(2)(3) when consumed at levels necessary to justify a claim.
79. Defendants’ conduct is further “unlawful” because it violates The California
Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, which incorporates the provisions
of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
80. The acts, omissions, misrepresentations, practices, and non-disclosures of
Defendants as alleged herein also constitute “unfair” business acts and
practices under the UCL in that Defendants’ conduct is immoral,
unscrupulous, and offends public policy. Further, the gravity of Defendants’
conduct outweighs any conceivable benefit of such conduct.
81. The acts, omissions, misrepresentations, practices, and non-disclosures of
Defendants as alleged herein also constitute “fraudulent” business acts and
practices under the UCL in that Defendants’ claims are false, misleading,
and have a tendency to deceive the Class and the general public.
82. In accordance with Bus. & Prof. Code § 17203, Plaintiff seeks an order
enjoining Defendants from continuing to conduct business through unlawful,
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 23 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
24
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
unfair, and/or fraudulent acts and practices, and to commence a corrective
advertising campaign.
83. Plaintiff further seeks an order for the disgorgement and restitution of all
monies from the sale of the Defendants’ Products, which were acquired
through acts of unlawful, unfair, and/or fraudulent competition.
COUNT II Violations of California Legal Remedies Act
Cal. Civ. Code § 1750 et seq. (On Behalf of Plaintiff and the Classes Against Defendants)
84. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if fully restated herein.
85. Plaintiff has standing to pursue this claim as Plaintiff has suffered injuries in
fact and has lost money or property as a result of Defendants’ actions as set
forth herein.
86. This cause of action is brought on behalf of all people of the State of
California in accordance with the provisions of the California Legal
Remedies Act (California Civil Code section 1770). Class members have
lost money or property as a result of Defendants’ actions as set forth herein.
87. Defendants’ wrongful business practices constituted, and constitute, a
continuing course of conduct of violation of the California Legal Remedies
Act since Defendants are still representing that the Products have
characteristics and abilities which are false and misleading.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 24 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
88. Defendants’ wrongful business practices have caused injury to Plaintiff and
the Class.
89. Pursuant to section 1770 of the California Civil Code, Plaintiff and the Class
seek an order of this Court enjoining Defendants from continuing to engage
in unlawful, unfair, or deceptive business practices and any other act
prohibited by law, including those set forth in this Complaint.
90. As a result, Plaintiff, the Class, and the general public are entitled to
injunctive and equitable relief, restitution, and an order for the disgorgement
of the funds by which Defendants were unjustly enriched.
91. Plaintiff and the Class also seek Punitive Damages since Defendants were
put on notice of its violations of the California Legal Remedies Act and took
no remedial actions.
COUNT III Violations of the False Advertising Law, Business and Professions
Code Sections 17500 et seq. (On Behalf of Plaintiff and the Classes Against Defendants)
92. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if fully restated herein.
93. In violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500 et seq., the advertisements,
labeling, policies, acts, and practices described herein were designed to, and
did, result in the purchase and use of the Product.
94. Defendants knew and reasonably should have known that the advertising,
marketing and labeling of the Products was untrue and/or misleading.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 25 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
95. As a result, Plaintiff, the Class, and the general public are entitled to
injunctive and equitable relief, restitution, and an order for the disgorgement
of the funds by which Defendants were unjustly enriched.
COUNT IV Breach of Express Warranty
(On Behalf of Plaintiff and the Classes Against Defendants) 96. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if fully restated herein.
97. Defendants made several different express warranties upon which Plaintiff
relied in making her purchase, including the false and misleading claims
contained herein.
98. In fact, there is no competent and reliable scientific evidence that support
any of Defendants’ claims, and actually there is competent and reliable
scientific evidence refuting those claims.
99. Plaintiff received a product that did not meet any of the efficacy claims
made by Defendants, resulting in Plaintiff purchasing a useless product.
100. These facts constitute breaches of all applicable express warranties as
alleged in this Complaint.
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 26 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and the Class Members demand judgment in their
favor against the Defendants, jointly and severally, as follows:
a. A determination that this action proceed as a class action and Plaintiff
adequately represent the Classes;
b. An Order requiring Defendants to bear the cost of class notice;
c. For compensatory, consequential and special damages in amounts proved, as
well as statutory damages, including a return of all amounts paid for the
Product sold by the Defendants to the Plaintiff and the Class Members;
d. For interest thereon, in the maximum amount allowable under applicable
law;
e. For delay damages thereon, in the maximum amount allowable under
applicable law;
f. For costs of suit, in the maximum amount allowable under applicable law;
g. For punitive damages, to the maximum amount permitted under applicable
law;
h. For an award of attorneys’ fees and costs, to the maximum amount permitted
under applicable law;
i. For injunctive relief, restraining and enjoining the Defendants from
continuing to use these deceptive sales tactics;
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 27 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
j. For restitution of the funds which were unjustly enriched by Defendants, at
the expense of the Plaintiff and Class Members; and
k. For such other and further relief for the Plaintiff as this Honorable Court
shall deem just.
DATED: August 7, 2013 Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Brian Tomina
BRIAN TOMINA, Bar No. 255386 5900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2600 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Telephone: (248) 327-6556 Facsimile: (248) 436-3385 [email protected] www.legalactionnow.com
/s/ Nick Suciu III______________ NICK SUCIU III (Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming) OLIVER LAW GROUP, P.C. 950 W. University Drive, Suite 200
Rochester, MI 48307 Telephone: (248) 327-6556 Facsimile: (248) 436-3385 [email protected] www.legalactionnow.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Stephanie Hirmez, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 28 of 29
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiffs and the Class Members demand trial by jury as to all matters and issues
triable.
DATED: August 7, 2013 Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Brian Tomina
BRIAN TOMINA, Bar No. 255386 5900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2600 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Telephone: (248) 327-6556 Facsimile: (248) 436-3385 [email protected] www.legalactionnow.com
/s/ Nick Suciu III______________ NICK SUCIU III (Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming) OLIVER LAW GROUP, P.C. 950 W. University Drive, Suite 200
Rochester, MI 48307 Telephone: (248) 327-6556 Facsimile: (248) 436-3385 [email protected] www.legalactionnow.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Stephanie Hirmez, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 29 of 29
Case 3:13-cv-01828-BEN-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 08/07/13 Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A
GNC ProefkListRilqLq4_AWt@dkcNA16inPS6etnlAnutitl-14mcEil-eg/Q§/PKM°EDgV. of 43age 1 of 1
Horne Shop..19y.Brand GNC Pro Performance® Rapid Drive Arginine 5000- Fruit Punch
GNC Pro Performance® RapidDrive Share I,Share sh.are
Arginine 5000- Fruit Punch1.76 lb(s).351188Price: $39.99
PEOPLE WHO BUY THIS ALSO BUY:Member Price: $23.97Become a Member
mticif Buy One Get One 50% Off, Mix and Match! Details 6NC Pro Performancee
Rapiclorine SCAA SOO FruitREAM Punchscapo43 $1 Flat Rate Shippingi Details
Read 21 Reviews. Write a Review
Recommend 29 people recommend thiS. Be the first of yourfriends.
Price: $37.99
ti Receive Thursday Order within 2hr 3minGNC Mega Men® Sport
FREE 2-Day Shipping Icgrgmore I skim in
Sbips only ta US customersDIY: 1
Learn More
AVAILABILITY: In stock, Ships in 1-2 full bus. days. Details
Price: $20.99
ONO Pro Performance®
RapidDrive Gtutarnine 5000-Fruit Punch
DESCRIPTION SUPPLEMENT HEALTH NOTES: LABEL RATINGS AND ASK AFACTS REVIEWS QUESTION
Dietary SupplementFast Delivery of 5000mg of Micronized L-Arginine Price: $31.99Maximizes ND. Production and Nutrient DeliveryFuels Muscle Pumps and Blood Flow
Pro Performance RapidDrive Arginine 5000 features our most advanced RapidDrive Amino Acid Technology. This formula have beenscientifically designed to provide your body with 5000mg of Arginine that has been pulverized, or "micronized, from large moleculesinto smaller particles that are easier to absorb and deliver fast fuel for powerful performance. Arginire is a crucial part of the nitricoxide pathway which helps to maintain blood vessel tone. This key amino acid is also used by the body to make creatine arid fuel themuscles.
GNC's Product Development Scientists were challenged to create an advanced delivery form of amino acid supplements, a criticalsports nutdtion component that can be used in the regimen of top athletes. The result of these research efforts led to the creation ofthe RapidDrive Amino Series, a core group of superior and fast-absorbing amino acids for rapid muscle fueling results. This uniquetechnology is much more advanced compared to regular amino acids. Because our team is dedicated to continually improving sportsnutrition products, the Pro Performance RapidDrive Amino Series helps you, the athlete, get fast fuel for your muscles.
http://www.gnc.com/product/indexj sp?productIc1-3766223&cp=3703232 8/6/2013
Consumer Protection
MullidislrictLitigation
Case 3:1:3-cv-01828-BEN-WA Document 1-2 Filed 08/07/13 Page 1 of 1
IS 44 (Rev. 09/11) CIVIL COVER SHEETThe .IS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement ihc filing and service ofpleadings or otherpapers as required by law, except as providedthe Civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXTPACE OF nes FORM)by local rules ofcourt This form, approved by theJudicial Contemn= ofthe United Stales in September 1974, is required for the use ofthe Clerk ofCourt for the purpose ofmitiatingI. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTSStephanie Hirmez, GNC Holdings, Inc.; General Nutrition Corp., rlibla GNC: end
General Nutrition Centers, Inc.;(b) County ofResidence ofFirst Listed Plaintiff San Diego County ofResidence of First Listed Defendant Allegheny (PA)(EXCEPT IN U.S. FLAINTIFPCASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
NOTE: /N LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OFTHE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.
BffaA itM?f1121grikr. ggilitrageglinVlefegUp PC Attorney& (7./Known.1C ItO
5900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2800, Los Angeles, CA 90036 '13 CV1828 BEN JMA248-327-6556H. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place CM "r'ill One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an -X"M OneBar forPkrinie)0 1 US. Goverment 0 3 Federal Qaestion
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Boxfor Defenrlanr)PTF DEFPlaintiff P17 DEF(U.S. Govenunenr Nat a Parry) Citizen ofThis State N 1 0 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 0 4 X 4ofBusiness In This State
02 U.S. Goventment C11( 4 DiversityDefendant Citizen ofAnother State 0 2 0 2 Incorporatedand Princip4 Place CI 5 0 5(krelieme Citizenship ofParties In Item LID
of Business In AnotherState
Citizen cc Subject ofa 0 3 0 3 Foreign Nation 0 6 0 6Foreign CountryIV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an "..1— n One Bar Ordti.litfftretrzck;j,•rni',4j..1i 'F'iilt:::44:-..affnaRRRSFATIEitlfriT,IE71:-,?.:EJ;T:E'5L-711ErMilEfF7,47717".F1-:4. i, I NTIVEVAM5=177:1-Z7i7:111W-4'4.-4` r:IrgalVITT.17.Q41:21-f4t1:-.7, i:VeZ:1;;Uf0 i (0 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY0 129 Marine
PERSONAL INJURY 0 625 Drug Related Seizure 0 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 0 375 False Claims Act0 130 Miles Act
0 310 Airplane 0 365 Personal [Wary ofPropeny 21 USC 881 ID 421 Withdrawal 0 400 State Reapportionment0 MO Negotiable Instrument
0 3 /5 Airplane Product Product Liability 0 690 Other 28 USC 157 0 410 AntitrustLiability 0 367 Health Care0 150 Recovery ofOverpayment 0 320 Mundt, Libel & 0 430 Banb and BanldngPharmaceutical Mirlirj--Tit.",1....fts-iffaati1iRil 0 459 Commerce& Enforcement ofludgment Slander Persona] Injury CI 820 Copyrights 0 460 Deportation0 151 Medicare Act0 152 Recovery ofDefaulted
0 330 Federal Employers' Product Liability 0 830 Patent 0 470 Racketeer Influenced andLiability 0 368 Asbestos PersonalStudent Loans 0 340 Marine 0 MO Trademark Corrupt °manhattansInjury Product(Excl. Veterans) 0 480ConsumerCredit0 345 Marine Product Liability,2416.,..i.,Krti, i.y0 -;i4..x2,1, u.til-rt75.7.VT-M-6917:17,37LILTIZ: 0 490 Cable/Sat rv0 153 Recovery ofOverpayment LiabilityofVeteran's Benefits 0 350 Motor Vehicle
PERSONAL PROPERTY 0 'HO Fair LaborStodards 0 861 HTA (139511) 0 850 Securities/Commodities/0 160 Stockholders' Suits 0 355 Motor Vehicle
XL 370 Othez Fraud Act 0 862 Black Lung (923) Eschew0 190 Other Connect
0 371 Trutb in Lending 0 720 LabotiMgmt Relations 0 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) 890 Other Statutory AftoluProduct Liability 0 380 Other Personal 0 740 Railway Laboe Ad 0 864 SS1D Tide XVI 0 891 Agricultural Acts0 195 Contract Product Liabdity 0 360 Other Personal0 196 Franchise Property Damage 0 751 Family and Medical 0 865 RSI (405(8)) 0 893 Environmental Mattersinjury 0 385 Property Damage Leave Act 0 895 Freedom ofInformation0 362 Personal Injury Product Liability 0 799 Other Labor Litigation Act0 791 &opt. Ret. Inc.
1FIVsTRIIM:ALZW.41.P2b-EfalLoTirazirfiiimair=7-,riz-Eia,ci 210 I snd Condemnation Semwity Act Efit:075711721K-t(kr:-.1:714-;74:71: 0 899 Arbelidstraiive Procedure
0 896 ArbitrationIn 44o other Mil nights 0 510 Motions to VacateCr 220 Foreclosure CI 870 Taxes OIL Plaintiff Act/Review or Appeal of0 441 Voting Sentence
or Defendant) Agency Decision0 230 Rent Lsase & Ejectment 0 442 Employment Habeas Cswpust0 240 Torts to Land CI 871 /R.S—Third Party 0 950 ConstitallonalOy of0 443 Housing/ 0 530 General 26 USC 7609 State StatutesCI 245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations CI 535 Death Penalty 4=1.42l1.tli:1Qi'.1:4"30 290 All Other Real Properly CI 445 Amer. w/Ditiabilities 0 540 Mandamus & Other Of 462 Nstundtsation ApplicationEmployment 0 550 Civil Rights CI 463 Habeas Corpus0 446 Amer. w/Disabilities 0 555 Prison Condition Alien DetaineeOther 0 560 Civil Detainee (Prisoner Petition)C/ 448 Education Conditions of Ol 465 Other iennigration
Coadmment Actions
V. ORIGIN (Plate an "X- in One BarOnry),1g I Original 0 2 Removed from 0 3 Remanded from 0 4 Reinstated or 0 5 Thmsfelred from 0 6Proceeding State Court another districtAppellate Court Reopened fsaccifut
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION I Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are Cling (Da mat eirelerisdkelerral son(es Weisdiversity):28 USG Section 1332Brief description of cause:
VII. REQUESTED IN al CHECK IF MS IS A CLASS ACTION DEMAND CHECK YES only if dananded in complaint:COMPLAINT: UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 5,000,000.00 JURY DEMAND: CR Yes 0 NoVIII. RELATED CASE(S)(Soo korualonaIF ANY JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
DATESIGNATURE OF ATFORNEY OF RECORD
08/07/2013 Is/ Brian TominaFOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT N AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE