bringing william forsythe’s “improvisation … release/dancer magazine...bringing william...

3
M a s t e r c l a s s 68 ~ ~ December 2009 Bringing William Forsythe’s “Improvisation Technologies” to a New Generation By Carrie Stern Courtesy of Dance- wave, Photos by Tom Rawe S even teens, all novice improvisers, were recently introduced to the work of influential choreographer William Forsythe in a workshop at Dance- wave, a Brooklyn-based dance organization. According to the workshop leader, dancer Natalie Thomas, the children “investi- gate personal relationships” to: space, the journey between two body points (distance, direction, motion), one another, and “to imaginary circumstances.” They begin with simple movements— knee-to-elbow, développés and twisting motions. Later, they begin experimenting with tork and extension, moving two points of the body towards and away from each other. Slowly, the children explore other options—what changes if they lay on the floor? “Try a little finger and a big toe,” Thomas calls out. One discovers falling and rolling, others explore odd locomotion— pulling their body with one hand and walking like a crab. “Pretend one part of your body is a hook attached to a truck. If the driver puts on the gas, what hap- pens?” A sudden flurry of bod- ies leaning and stumbling fills the stage. Thomas builds the idea, asking the students to speed up at their discretion. New sugges- tions fly out: “Look for extremes in your movement,” says Thomas. “Switch to an usual point—inside thigh and collar bone,” she con- tinues. “Remember the space behind you!” She demonstrates one of the Forsythe technique’s necessities: “loose hips.” Gently pushing each dancer, they fall, releasing their backs, hips and heads; they begin to work deeply in their bodies, finding back spins and big sweeping movements fol- Right: Natalie Thomas supervising class

Upload: vutruc

Post on 01-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

M a s t e r c l a s s M a s t e r c l a s s68 ~ ~ December 2009 December 2009 ~ ~ 69

Bringing William Forsythe’s “Improvisation Technologies”

to a New Generation

By Carrie Stern

Courtesy of Dance-wave, Photos by Tom Rawe

Seven teens, all novice improvisers, were recently introduced to the work of

influential choreographer William Forsythe in a workshop at Dance-wave, a Brooklyn-based dance organization. According to the workshop leader, dancer Natalie Thomas, the children “investi-gate personal relationships” to: space, the journey between two body points (distance, direction, motion), one another, and “to imaginary circumstances.” They begin with simple movements—knee-to-elbow, développés and twisting motions. Later, they begin experimenting with tork and extension, moving two points of the body towards and away from each other. Slowly, the children explore other options—what changes if they lay on the floor? “Try a little finger and a big toe,” Thomas calls out. One discovers falling and rolling, others explore odd locomotion— pulling their body with one hand and walking like a crab.

“Pretend one part of your body is a hook attached to a truck. If the driver puts on the gas, what hap-pens?” A sudden flurry of bod-ies leaning and stumbling fills the stage. Thomas builds the idea, asking the students to speed up at their discretion. New sugges-tions fly out: “Look for extremes in your movement,” says Thomas. “Switch to an usual point—inside thigh and collar bone,” she con-tinues. “Remember the space behind you!” She demonstrates one of the Forsythe technique’s necessities: “loose hips.” Gently pushing each dancer, they fall, releasing their backs, hips and heads; they begin to work deeply in their bodies, finding back spins and big sweeping movements fol-

lowed by tiny finger circles.The final exploration desig-

nates a “puppeteer” who conducts his or her partner’s movement by performing movements of their own. Some puppeteers are shy waving only a single arm. Others direct with spins and jumps. The partners interpret the gestures and respond. At times, the impromptu duet comes powerfully close to choreography. In the final itera-tion, together, the dancers create “a synchronicity” that Thomas finds “quite magical.”

The Lesson: The space between the two pointsInitiate movement between two specific points of the body. How far apart can you move them? How close together can you bring them? In how many different directions? How many ways can you travel the distance between the two points?

• Try two far away points.• Insert “truck.” (above)• Switch to two unusual points. (Additional suggestions in text.)• Awareness of relationship with others:o Duets—puppeteer and dancer.o Invisible puppeteer.

This is Natalie Thomas’ Choreo-lab III: Improvisational Movement, part of Brooklyn’s Dancewave’s teen program. A certified teacher of “William Forsythe Improvisation Technologies,” Thomas’ hopes, above all, to help the budding dancers “surprise themselves.”

Forsythe, a classically trained dancer often described as “reori-enting the practice of ballet,” developed a choreographic physi-cal language and process Thomas describes as “modalities of physi-cal translation.” It encourages

discovering one’s own physical metaphors and ways of mov-ing. Thomas, a former member of Forsythe’s Ballett Frankfurt and a choreographer, explains: “The work promotes openness and receptivity. Students discover their ability to be non-judgmental catalogers, moving away from, and beyond, constructed per-formance—dancing in ways never imagined.” Thomas has adapted Forsythe’s approach to her own “Improvisational Movement” for actors and dancers.

Q: Describe William Forsythe’s “innovative dance technologies.” A: It’s based on systems rather than form and technique. That’s why it’s called technologies, not technique. It uses geometry, spatial orientation—concepts in which, when you dance, you live through them and invent them in real time. For example, instead of saying “passé,” one might say “investigate the space between your knee and your ankle.” Or, “draw a diagonal line with your knee towards the upstage corner.” It’s the task rather than the result.

Q: What are “modalities of physical translation?”A: A modality is a way of moving. Modality of physical translation is a system for taking the infor-mation that’s given by one body and translating it into your own (physical) language, and how you bridge the gap (in-between).

Q: How do you impart Forsythe’s style?A: The systems of Forsythe’s “Tech-nologies” creates new systems, which is the point. So I’ve invented my own way of teaching, my version of what I learned with Bill [Forsythe] and my experience since I left.

Every group has limitations that can be great to work around, or work through. I start with what’s available in the room—the individ-uals, their experience, their energy.

A lot of my techniques— tools and structures—developed when I trans-lated Forsythe for the actors in the Wooster Group’s “Hamlet.”* Bill’s work uses a lot of acting and text, voice work. I incorporate that to free-up participants as people and artists, to connect breath to body, to make them more receptive. I cre-ated exercises dealing with range of motion, things that for dancers are no problem.

With these kids, I’m developing warm-ups to get them playful, fear-less. It’s important to get them in a zone where they are willing to inves-tigate. I tell them not to think you have to look like something. But it’s been ingrained in us—in me as a ballet dancer. You look at yourself in a mirror eight hours a day.

Q: How do you translate the complexity and layering of Forsythe’s work into something children can grasp and perform?A: Due to time, I rarely get to as many layers as Bill commonly works with. I have this group until June, but I won’t rush them. When too many ideas are given, and you’re not ready to receive them, it gets diluted. I’d rather see one or two specific ideas developed. The layers come from the history you have in your body, a history with movement, and with a group.

Q: What are some of the challenges of doing this?A: This was only the fifth class. At a simple level, they’re going to need to learn to move in a differ-ent way, to build new coordina-tions. To isolate a pinky toe and a collarbone—to be that specific, it

Right: Natalie Thomas supervising class

M a s t e r c l a s s M a s t e r c l a s s68 ~ ~ December 2009 December 2009 ~ ~ 69

Bringing William Forsythe’s “Improvisation Technologies”

to a New Generation

By Carrie Stern

Courtesy of Dance-wave, Photos by Tom Rawe

Seven teens, all novice improvisers, were recently introduced to the work of

influential choreographer William Forsythe in a workshop at Dance-wave, a Brooklyn-based dance organization. According to the workshop leader, dancer Natalie Thomas, the children “investi-gate personal relationships” to: space, the journey between two body points (distance, direction, motion), one another, and “to imaginary circumstances.” They begin with simple movements—knee-to-elbow, développés and twisting motions. Later, they begin experimenting with tork and extension, moving two points of the body towards and away from each other. Slowly, the children explore other options—what changes if they lay on the floor? “Try a little finger and a big toe,” Thomas calls out. One discovers falling and rolling, others explore odd locomotion— pulling their body with one hand and walking like a crab.

“Pretend one part of your body is a hook attached to a truck. If the driver puts on the gas, what hap-pens?” A sudden flurry of bod-ies leaning and stumbling fills the stage. Thomas builds the idea, asking the students to speed up at their discretion. New sugges-tions fly out: “Look for extremes in your movement,” says Thomas. “Switch to an usual point—inside thigh and collar bone,” she con-tinues. “Remember the space behind you!” She demonstrates one of the Forsythe technique’s necessities: “loose hips.” Gently pushing each dancer, they fall, releasing their backs, hips and heads; they begin to work deeply in their bodies, finding back spins and big sweeping movements fol-

lowed by tiny finger circles.The final exploration desig-

nates a “puppeteer” who conducts his or her partner’s movement by performing movements of their own. Some puppeteers are shy waving only a single arm. Others direct with spins and jumps. The partners interpret the gestures and respond. At times, the impromptu duet comes powerfully close to choreography. In the final itera-tion, together, the dancers create “a synchronicity” that Thomas finds “quite magical.”

The Lesson: The space between the two pointsInitiate movement between two specific points of the body. How far apart can you move them? How close together can you bring them? In how many different directions? How many ways can you travel the distance between the two points?

• Try two far away points.• Insert “truck.” (above)• Switch to two unusual points. (Additional suggestions in text.)• Awareness of relationship with others:o Duets—puppeteer and dancer.o Invisible puppeteer.

This is Natalie Thomas’ Choreo-lab III: Improvisational Movement, part of Brooklyn’s Dancewave’s teen program. A certified teacher of “William Forsythe Improvisation Technologies,” Thomas’ hopes, above all, to help the budding dancers “surprise themselves.”

Forsythe, a classically trained dancer often described as “reori-enting the practice of ballet,” developed a choreographic physi-cal language and process Thomas describes as “modalities of physi-cal translation.” It encourages

discovering one’s own physical metaphors and ways of mov-ing. Thomas, a former member of Forsythe’s Ballett Frankfurt and a choreographer, explains: “The work promotes openness and receptivity. Students discover their ability to be non-judgmental catalogers, moving away from, and beyond, constructed per-formance—dancing in ways never imagined.” Thomas has adapted Forsythe’s approach to her own “Improvisational Movement” for actors and dancers.

Q: Describe William Forsythe’s “innovative dance technologies.” A: It’s based on systems rather than form and technique. That’s why it’s called technologies, not technique. It uses geometry, spatial orientation—concepts in which, when you dance, you live through them and invent them in real time. For example, instead of saying “passé,” one might say “investigate the space between your knee and your ankle.” Or, “draw a diagonal line with your knee towards the upstage corner.” It’s the task rather than the result.

Q: What are “modalities of physical translation?”A: A modality is a way of moving. Modality of physical translation is a system for taking the infor-mation that’s given by one body and translating it into your own (physical) language, and how you bridge the gap (in-between).

Q: How do you impart Forsythe’s style?A: The systems of Forsythe’s “Tech-nologies” creates new systems, which is the point. So I’ve invented my own way of teaching, my version of what I learned with Bill [Forsythe] and my experience since I left.

Every group has limitations that can be great to work around, or work through. I start with what’s available in the room—the individ-uals, their experience, their energy.

A lot of my techniques— tools and structures—developed when I trans-lated Forsythe for the actors in the Wooster Group’s “Hamlet.”* Bill’s work uses a lot of acting and text, voice work. I incorporate that to free-up participants as people and artists, to connect breath to body, to make them more receptive. I cre-ated exercises dealing with range of motion, things that for dancers are no problem.

With these kids, I’m developing warm-ups to get them playful, fear-less. It’s important to get them in a zone where they are willing to inves-tigate. I tell them not to think you have to look like something. But it’s been ingrained in us—in me as a ballet dancer. You look at yourself in a mirror eight hours a day.

Q: How do you translate the complexity and layering of Forsythe’s work into something children can grasp and perform?A: Due to time, I rarely get to as many layers as Bill commonly works with. I have this group until June, but I won’t rush them. When too many ideas are given, and you’re not ready to receive them, it gets diluted. I’d rather see one or two specific ideas developed. The layers come from the history you have in your body, a history with movement, and with a group.

Q: What are some of the challenges of doing this?A: This was only the fifth class. At a simple level, they’re going to need to learn to move in a differ-ent way, to build new coordina-tions. To isolate a pinky toe and a collarbone—to be that specific, it

Right: Natalie Thomas supervising class

M a s t e r c l a s s70 ~ ~ December 2009

will take a while…but I think they can get there with their ideas. I want to challenge them with new com-position ideas, so over time they can grasp ideas that they can’t [yet] physically implement.

Q: How do the kids react to the work?A: I think the first class frightened and shocked them. It was different than what they’d had before. They want to know things, not be left in a not-knowing state of mind. But by the second class they were excited, ready to be challenged; they could start to see the importance of the work. Having me demonstrate, seeing Bill’s work, showed them where it could go. You don’t know when they’ve taken the jump to new understandings until you throw it out there.

Q: Forsythe’s company performed at the Brooklyn Academy of Music in October. What did the students say when they saw the company perform?A: A few understood and were fascinated with it the way I am. A lot were confused. For some, maybe, it was too big a step. I had to explain to them that it was a theatrical event—that the performers and Bill wanted to explore many things, and that it’s very specific and not an exercise.

If I hadn’t seen much avant-garde work I’d be [confused, too]. I came from Pacific Northwest Bal-let. After I got into Nederlands Dans Theater 2, I got a video of Bill’s work. I was 18 and seeing it shook my foundation. I didn’t like it. I was terrified by how different it was. Once I got into Ballett Frankfurt I found it’s value, it has it’s own classicism.

Q: How do you approach teaching?A: This class is an introduction to intellectual move-ment. It’s about exploration. I think that’s interesting at this point in their lives when they’re reading great literature in school and being encouraged to find their own voice and opinions.

I’m interested in their experience, not the result. It’s the first time they’ve done improvisation [like this]. It takes patience, energy, and negotiation on my part. There’s always a balance between teach-ing them the physical tools they need for dexterity in their body, and the freedom to take risks and not worry. Hopefully you come up with exercises that do both at the same time.

What I love is their learning curve; it’s unbeliev-able. If you’re true to your value system they pick it up whether it’s improvisation or ballet. I thought it might be more difficult to show them [than adults]

the inherent value of the work. Because I believe it so much, and they’re willing, it’s not an issue. And when you tap into their not-so-conscious part, they’re willing to take risks. Teens want to take risks when given the chance.

Q: What is your goal for the class?A: Over the year, we’ll establish ways of moving, then move into partnering, choreography, and dissecting choreography. It’s a great way to create our own-shared history. After a year I may make a piece for them, but I consider that separate.

The aim of improv in general is to find tasks in which you can surprise yourself—new awareness, new orientations, new body systems. The task of puppet and master—someone else moving your body—was a simple way to introduce movement “new” to your body. In the end they could all listen to, and read from, [their part-ner]. I was so happy they could take that step.* THE WOOSTER GROUP is an ensemble of performance and media artists specializing in new forms and techniques of theatrical expression under the direction of Elizabeth LeCompte. Hamlet pre-miered at New York’s Public Theater in 2007.Find Natalie Thomas at ntprofile.comFor more information on Dancewave’s programs visit www.dancewave.org