Higher HistoryBritain: Britain: The Motives of the

Liberal ReformsWhy did the Liberals introduce

their reforms 1906-14?

We are learning to…Explain why the Liberals introduced a series of reforms between 1906 and 14

I can…Build up notes on the topicPlan a 20 mark essayPass a 20 mark timed essay

Background (for intro)Background (for intro)• Prior to 1906, there was almost no help available for poor

people in Britain• The liberals had always had a ‘laissez-faire’ style of

government – not interfering in peoples’ lives• The only limited help available for those in poverty was the

‘Poor Law’ which was means tested• This usually resulted in people being put in a workhouse

(poorhousepoorhouse in Scotland) where conditions were horrendous – 90% of people refused this option

• Charities such as Barnardos, the Salvation Army and the YMCA offered what help they could to people but demand was too great for them to help everyone

• From 1906 the Liberal government introduced welfare reforms (changes in the law) to offer more help to the poor

What were the MOTIVESMOTIVES for the Liberal Reforms 1906-1914?

• When the Liberals were elected in 1906, there had been no mention of introducing social welfare reform in their manifesto.

• So why why did the Liberal Reforms like free school meals and pensions get introduced?

• There were 5 factors/ motives for reform

The arguments for the introduction of Liberal Reforms

‘The Factors’1. Surveys of Booth and Rowntree1. Surveys of Booth and Rowntree

2. Fears over National Security/ 2. Fears over National Security/ EfficiencyEfficiency

3. Fear of the Labour Party3. Fear of the Labour Party

4. ‘New Liberalism’4. ‘New Liberalism’

5. 5. Municipal SocialismMunicipal Socialism

1. Booth & Rowntree - 1. Booth & Rowntree - KnowledgeKnowledge• At the end of the 19th century two social surveys were published

that not only shocked the British public but changed popular opinion on the causes of poverty.

• Charles Booth was a London Businessman who carried out his survey in the East End of London and published his results in 1899 Life and Labour of the People of London

• His book showed that 35% of London’s population lived in extreme poverty, that poverty was so bad that only the government could help and that if nothing was done, Britain was on the brink of a socialist Revolution

• Seebohm Rowntree published his study of York to identify if the problem of poverty was as bad in the towns of Britain

• He found that 30% of York’s population lived in poverty, that there was a ‘poverty line’ of the basic minimum amount a family needed to survive and that there were certain times that individuals were more likely to fall into poverty – most importantly old age

Charles Booth

• “The survey into London life and labour”.

• Click on image to view video clip.

Seebohm Rowntree

• First York study (1899).

• Click on image to view clip.

Findings of the Surveys• Their findings agreed on some key points:• Up to 30% or almost 1/3rd 30% or almost 1/3rd of the population

of the cities were living on or below poverty levels.

• The conditions were such that people could not pull themselves out of poverty by their own actions alone.

• Poverty was not self inflicted• Booth and Rowntree both identified the main

causes of poverty as being illness, illness, unemployment and age unemployment and age - both the very young and the old were at risk of poverty.

Analysis (basic)Analysis (basic)•This shows that politicians now had statistical evidence to which showed that no matter how hard people tried, they could not lift themselves out of poverty and the government would need to act to help them•In addition, the surveys helped promote the idea of a ‘deserving poor’ those who were trying to lift themselves out of poverty which was an important theme of the liberal reforms and started to break down old ideas that poor people were lazy, ignorant and squandered their money

Social Surveys: Analysis

Analysis (+)Analysis (+)•However, it is important to remember that there were many people, MPs included, challenged the surveys and still believed that poverty was not widespread and that poor people wasted their money on alcohol and gambling which caused them to be poor•In addition, poverty in rural areas was ignored by the surveys as they focussed only on inner-city areas like London and York

Social Surveys: Analysis

2. Fears over National Security/ Efficiency2. Fears over National Security/ Efficiency

• The Boer War (1899 - 1902) – The Boer War (1899 - 1902) – National securityNational security

• Britain became involved in a war in South Africa, which was part of the British Empire at the time

• The government became alarmed when almost 25% of potential volunteers were rejected on the grounds of ill health

• This figure was even higher when it came to the industrial cities like Manchester

• This was greatly alarming as the British Army should have been able to protect the country against enemies far stronger than the Boers.

Germany and National Efficiency

• It was felt that countries like the USA and especially Germany were pulling ahead of Britain.

• Liberal politicians like Winston Churchill and Lloyd George had visited Germany (Britain’s main rival) and were impressed by the effects on the nations health by the range of welfare benefits the German government had introduced – e.g. pensions and free school meals.

• Germany had introduced reforms like pensions and school meals since the 1880s

• Lloyd George warned after his visit that British young men could not compete with those in Bismarck’s Germany and that young unemployed men did not know where to find work in Britain

Analysis (basic)Analysis (basic)•These concerns during the Boer War and over Germany were a definite motive for reform because if Britain did not have a fit and healthy workforce then they would not be able to compete in future wars such as the one looming with Germany or retain their status as ‘Great Power’•The very earliest reforms in 1906/7 (free school meals and medical inspections) are generally considered a direct result of the fears over national security and efficiency Analysis (+)Analysis (+)•However many historians have challenged this view that politicians had any genuine concern for the welfare of the poor and instead wanted to pass reforms for political advantage – such as Churchill making a name for himself or the liberal party wanting to gain working class votes over Labour

National Security & Efficiency: Analysis

3. Fear of Labour Party/Political . Fear of Labour Party/Political AdvantageAdvantage

• The Labour Party was newly established in 1900 and it was winning public support for its campaigns for social welfare policies, such as old age pensions and unemployment benefits.

• The ruling Liberal Party recognised the threat this new party posed to its traditional support in many working class areas.

• They needed to offer something similar to woo the working class male voters

• The Labour party already had the support of working males through it’s affiliation with the Labour party and this was a threat to the ruling Liberal party

Analysis (basic)Analysis (basic)•To counter the threat from the socialist and Labour movement, the Liberals realised that they had to introduce social reforms or risk losing political support from the working classes so they tried to ‘buy off’ voters with smaller reforms to avoid bigger ones e.g. offered pensions but raised the age limit to 70 years old.Analysis (+)Analysis (+)•However many historians have pointed out that the Liberals cannot have been truly worried by the Labour promises otherwise they would have matched or bettered the Labour party by offering pensions earlier Labour party were still very small in 1906 (29 seats) so probably did not pose a threat in terms of winning an electoral majority

Fear of Labour/ Political Advantage: Analysis

4. New Liberalism4. New Liberalism• Old Liberalism meant Laissez – faire;

poverty as the problem of the individual and minimal state intervention

• A new type of Liberalism had emerged by 1906, and it was this ‘New Liberalism' which provided the inspiration for reform.

• New Liberals, such as Lloyd George, Winston Churchill and Herbert Asquith, argued that there were circumstances in which it was right for the state to intervene in people's lives.

• They represented poorer areas – e.g. Lloyd George in Wales and Winston Churchill in Dundee.

New Liberalism - New Liberalism - AnalysisAnalysis

• Analysis (basic)Analysis (basic)• This shows that ‘New Liberalism’ was becoming more

influential within the ruling party due to the more modern and interventionist ideas of new Liberals like Churchhill and Lloyd George and the party was reforming from within and starting to believe that reform was necessary to help those in need

Analysis (+)Analysis (+)• However, historians have pointed out that the new

Liberals were still vastly outnumbered by ‘old’ laissez-faire Liberals and it was only when ‘old Liberal’ Campbell Bannerman died in 1908 that the new Liberals were able to introduce their interventionist ideas

5. Municipal Socialism5. Municipal Socialism• During the later 1800s the public had

enjoyed the intervention when Local authorities had been taxing people and using the money to improve local areas

• This showed people a basic socialist idea in practice – redistributing wealth redistributing wealth – and it worked!

• It paved the way for the Liberals to introduce reforms which would obviously cost more money e.g. pensions

Birmingham – an Birmingham – an example of municipal example of municipal

socialismsocialism• In 1873 Liberal Joseph Chamberlain became mayor of Birmingham and introduced many reforms there

• Birmingham's water supply was polluted and only supplied 3 days a week; he bought the waterworks and ran it for the good of the people

• He did the same with the gasworks• He cleared many slum houses• One report said he left Birmingham ‘parked,

paved, gas and watered and improved’

Public parks were another example of municipal socialism; bought by local councils to provide fresh air and recreation for people i.e. in

Glasgow cityGlasgow city

5. Municipal Socialism - 5. Municipal Socialism - analysisanalysis• Analysis (basic)Analysis (basic)

• Improvements to towns and cities done at local level using taxes had shown people that municipal socialism worked; everyone was taxed dependent on income but the positive end result outweighed the taxation

• This local socialism paved the way for similar reforms at national level and set a trend for social reform that the Liberals picked up on and continued

Analysis (+)Analysis (+)• However, we must remember that the local model was not able to

change the minds of everybody in terms of government intervention. There remained huge opposition in Britain to the idea of taxing the wealthy more to provide for the poor – particularly from the upper classes and middle classes who resented losing out financially to provide for the needy

Main Liberal Reforms

• 1906 Free School Meals 1906 Free School Meals – 14 million per week being issued by 1914.

• 1907 Medical Inspections Act 1907 Medical Inspections Act – medical inspections given at school

• 1908 Old Age Pensions 1908 Old Age Pensions – 25p per week for those 70+ (1/4 average wage).

• 1911 National Insurance I 1911 National Insurance I – sickness benefit for poorer workers – e.g. paid for doctor and medicine.

• 1911 National Insurance II 1911 National Insurance II – gave unemployment insurance to half a million poorly paid workers or those in seasonal employment.

ConsolidationConsolidation

• A good idea when you have taken all your notes for a topic is to create a condensed revision guide for the essay

• This might be a mind map, picture map, bullet points etc. but should fit on one page

• Do this for homework

Essay Questions• The Liberals motives is an example of an isolated isolated

factor essay factor essay – this means the SQA will ask you whether women got the vote because of a specific factor (one of the 5 we cover)

• You must talk about the factor in the question BUT you do not need to agree it is the most important

• Examples• How important were fears over national security and efficiency

in the Liberal government’s decision to introduce social reforms, 1906-1914?

• How important was fear of the labour party/ political advantage in the Liberal government’s decision to introduce social reforms, 1906-1914?

• How important was the rise of new liberalism in the Liberal government’s decision to introduce social reforms, 1906-1914?

Introduction – 3 step plan3 step plan

• Background (2/3 sentences – describe Britain’s help/ lack of help for poor before reform)

Before the Liberal Reforms…• FactorsFactors (what are the factors in the

essay?) There were many motives for the liberal

reforms such as… (1 in question 1st) (a list is fine)

• ArgumentArgument (what will you be arguing is most important?)

It can be argued that the most important factor was …because…

Conclusion – 4 step plan

• In conclusion, there were many reasons why the Liberals introduced reforms.

• On the one hand… (you should take one key factor here and explain why it was important)

• On the other hand… (now you should do the same with another key factor to balance your argument)

• Overall, the most important factor was… (keep your strongest until last, backing up why it is so importantwhy it is so important and it should be clear why it outweighs the other factors)

Example question – specimen Example question – specimen paperpaper

How important were the social surveys of Booth and Rowntree in the Liberal government’s decision to introduce social reforms, 1906-1914?

20 marks

Practice essay due Thurs 23/4.

Liberal Motives – timed Liberal Motives – timed essayessay

How important was the idea of municipal socialism in the Liberal government’s decision to introduce social reforms, 1906-1914?

20 marks

Evaluation • A good way to approach trying to get the

final 4 marks for evaluation is to take your factors (5 in this case) and rank them from most important to least important

• Try to come up with a reason Why each is in that place (not why it is important but why it is moremore or lessless important)

• A priority diagram can be a good technique to use – try to relate every factor back to your most important

EvaluationE1 and E2 E1 and E2 - 2 marks can be gained from making evaluative comments which relate to individual factors

ExampleExample – Upon evaluation, ______ was the most/least important factor in the introductions of reforms because...

NB – You must be saying something newnew in your evaluation, not repeating your analysis or doing ‘mini conclusions’

Evaluation +E+ E+ - up to 4 marks can be gained from making evaluative comments which show the relative importance between factors (i.e. you compare two)ExampleExample – Upon evaluation, the fears of national security were more important than ______ in the Nazis staying in power because...

NB – You must be saying something newnew in your evaluation, not repeating your analysis or doing ‘mini conclusions’Remember analysis is really tricky and many candidates get 0/4 but still get an A!