broken arrow public schools district assessment/accountability report october 25, 2010
DESCRIPTION
Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report October 25, 2010. Student Groups. All Students Regular Education Students Black American Indian Hispanic Asian White Other Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learners (ELL) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report
October 25, 2010
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Oklahoma Schools and Districts
Timeline for Statewide Performance Targets
Pursuant to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
APIBase
line2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Math 648 648 790 790 790 932 932 932 1074 1074 1216 1358 1500
Reading 622 622 768 768 768 914 914 914 1060 1060 1206 1352 1500
Student Groups
All Students Regular Education Students Black American Indian Hispanic Asian White Other Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learners (ELL) Students with Individualized Education Programs
(IEP)
API Point Contributions for Elementary and Middle Schools
O k lah o m a S ch o o lT e s tin g P ro g ra m (O S T P )
0 -13 5 0 p o in ts
A tten da n ce R a te0 -1 50 po in ts
B ase lin e A PI0 -1500 po in ts
90% 10%
API Point Contributions for High Schools
O k lah o m a S ch o o lT e s tin g P ro g ra m (O S T P )
0 -12 0 0 p o in ts
D ro po u t R a te0 -5 0 p o in ts
G ra du a tio n R a te0 -5 0 p o in ts
A tten da n ce R a te0 -5 0 p o in ts
S ch oo l C o m p le tion0 -1 50 po in ts
C o lle ge R em e d ia tio n R a tes0 -1 5 p o in ts
A d van ced P lace m e n t (A P )0 -4 5 p o in ts
A C T0 -9 0 p o in ts
A ca de m ic E xce lle n ce0 -1 50 po in ts
B ase lin e A PI0 -1500
80% 10% 10%
Changing Standards
Standards Raised for State Testing Program
The SDE approved more rigorous standards for 3-8th grade math and reading students in 2008-09. Raised the bar for determining success
“CUT SCORES” were increased Aligned proficiency levels closer to NAEP
Math and reading scores declined statewide
The new standards were used to determine API and AYP beginning with the 2009-10 school year.
Elementary 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
2008-09 Baseline
API 2009-10 Arrow Springs 1111 1133 1168 1254 1281 1161 1396 1425 1425 1320 1267 158 -53Arrowhead 1201 1023 1194 1229 1337 1324 1402 1382 1440 1274 1256 184 -18
Country Lane 1188 1231 1220 1226 1368 1482 1470 1461 1398 12481195 K-3 1223 4/5 189
K-3 -53 4/5 -25
Indian Springs 1139 1184 1209 1383 1419 1431 1403 1398 1476 1286 1221 255 -65Leisure Park 1203 1120 1225 1105 1390 1415 1419 1395 1423 1261 1265 158 4Lynn Wood 1084 1158 1086 1226 1327 1378 1440 1352 1392 1202 1124 268 -78Oak Crest 1032 1119 1209 1167 1381 1443 1368 1353 1368 1167 991 377 -176Park Lane 1202 1188 1266 1292 1396 1392 1374 1445 1417 1273 1255 162 -18Rhoades 1190 1143 1229 1275 1331 1450 1406 1405 1321 1154 1110 211 -44S.S./Liberty 1085 1177 1348 n/a 1320 1356 1387 1417 1390 1200 1267 123 67Spring Creek 1232 1272 1209 1197 1419 1338 1430 1423 1420 1282 1293 127 11Vandever 1247 1043 1177 1138 1343 1479 1422 1500 1417 1262 1258 159 -4Westwood 989 1228 1128 1380 1363 1351 1356 1423 1452 1250 1172 280 -78Wolf Creek 1229 1221 1215 1221 1347 1333 1390 1434 1407 1215 1229 178 14
Average 1152 1162 1206 1238 1359 1381 1404 1415 1410 1242 1208 202.07 -34Middle School 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Central/Cennt. 1095 1205 1079 1311 1294 1343 1359 1382 1381 1234 1224 157 -10Childers 1070 1249 1264 1311 1285 1362 1361 1376 1414 1273 1250 164 -23Haskell 1127 1097 1161 1213 1225 1316 1332 1347 1398 1214 1124 274 -90Oliver 1082 1223 1242 1304 1382 1334 1337 1366 1350 1142 1091 259 -51Sequoyah 1006 1115 1206 1183 1213 1268 1219 1322 1293 1083 1088 205 5
Average 1076 1178 1190 1264 1280 1325 1322 1359 1367 1189 1155 211.8 -34High Schools 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
NIHS 1047 1209 1131 1138 1222 1251 1347 1341 1394 1288 1268 126 -20SIHS 1134 1153 1198 1204 1256 1208 1359 1393 1389 1272 1300 89 28BAHS 1062 1120 1113 1156 1195 1206 1345 1337 1378 1258 1257 121 -1
Average 1081 1161 1147 1166 1224 1222 1350 1357 1387 1273 1275 112 22000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10
1133 1166 1181 1208 1298 1322 1347 1367 1368 1209 1194 174 -15State 1159 1180 1252 1279 1289 1079 1093 196 14
Difference 139 142 95 88 79 130 101
District
BAPS TOTAL API SCORES (Regular Education Students)
Dif
fere
nce
20
08-0
9 to
20
09-1
0D
iffe
ren
ce
fro
m
Bas
elin
e
Subgroup Base API API w/CI Subgroup Base API API w/CIOakCrest Regular Educ. 977 1058
All 974 1045 ALL 972 1037White 946 1025
Econ. Disadv. 881 998 Econ. Disadv. 874 981
Lynn Wood Econ. Disadv. 937 1037 NO
Liberty Econ. Disadv. 788 887 NO
Centennial Black 795 1002 NO
Sequoyah Econ. Disadv. 909 983 NO
Haskell ELL 149 410Hispanic 556 763Econ. Disadv. 844 905
Oliver IEP 804 970 IEP 721 906ALL 1010 1047
SIHS IEP 852 1038Econ. Disadv. 983 1066
NO YES
NONO
NO
NO NO
Did Not Meet 2009-10 API/AYP RequirementsMade AYP
NO
Site 1st Year School Improvement
NO
Math: 1074 Reading: 1060
NO
NO
NO
District Make AYP?Base API API w/CI Base API API w/CI
ELL 856 994 CI 697 849 CI
IEP 1006 1073 CI 938 SH 1008 CI
Black 1014 SH 1135 CI 1016 SH 1134 CI
Hispanic 900 1020 CI
Asian 968 SH 1158 CI
Econ. Disadv. 1036 1069 CI 990 1022 CI
API Regular Education 1212 1231 CI 1209 1226 CI
Subgroup
2010 District Accountability Report: AYP/Safe Harbor Status
NO NO
Is BAPS a School Improvement District?
Math API Target: 1074
Reading API Target: 1060
Community Group Broken Arrow Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Putnam City Union
80
84
67
8480 79
7073
81
86
73
8482
70
7774
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
Math Reading
Broken Arrow Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
Community Group Comparison: 3rd Grade2009-10
80
87
59
81 81
73 7470
80
86
67
8179
7274
69
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
Math Reading
Broken Arrow Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
Community Group Comparison: 4th Grade2009-10
Community Group Comparison: 5th Grade2009-10
79
89
72
8285
79 78
7276
88
72
8179
7472 70
9497
9296
91 91 91 90
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
Math Reading Science
BA Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
Community Group Comparison: 5th Grade2009-10
84
93
75
90
85
7882
78
92
96
89
96
91
86
93
89
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
Soc. Studies Writing
BA Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
72
87
67
8682
70
77
67 67
85
66
86
77
66
70 68
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
Math Reading
Broken Arrow Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
Community Group Comparison: 6th Grade2009-10
Community Group Comparison: 7th Grade2009-10
75
89
75
82 82
75 75
68 70
85
7679 79
74 7571
93
98
9296 95
8987
89
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
Math Reading Geography
BA Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
Community Group Comparison: 8th Grade2009-10
80
88
82 84 83
70
82
69
8789
8284 84
73
82
74
9697
9396
98
90 9091
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
Math Reading Science
BA Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
Community Group Comparison: 8th Grade2009-10
83
91
76
8893
80 79 77
98 9794
98 9794 94 95
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
Soc. Studies Writing
BA Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
District Testing Highlights: 2009-10
5th grade Social Studies…highest score (tied) since 2001-02 Writing…5 consecutive years with no score lower
than 91% proficient Science…5 consecutive years with scores at 93%
or higher
8th grade Science…7 consecutive years with scores at or
above 90% proficient U.S. History…2nd highest score since 2001-02 Writing…highest score (98%) since 2001-02
Community Group Comparison: EOI2009-10
8793
82
8993
77
86
78
9397
9294 95
88 87 87
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
Algebra I English II
BA Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
Community Group Comparison: EOI2009-10
63
90
70
9289
81
95
68
87
96
82
92 92
78
89
83
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
Algebra II Geometry
BA Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
Community Group Comparison: EOI2009-10
83
92
70
8984 84
8075
85
93
74
87 88
7782
78
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
U.S. History Biology I
BA Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
Community Group Comparison: EOI2009-10
90
98
87
96 9490 92
88
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% S
atis
fact
ory
and
Ab
ove
English III
BA Edmond Lawton Moore Norman Put. City Union State
District Testing Highlights: 2009-10
End-of-Instruction Geometry…highest score during three
years of state testing English II…highest score since testing
began in 2000-01 English III…tied the highest score during
three years of state testing Biology I…highest score since testing
began in 2002-03 U.S. History…tied the highest score over
the last 10 years
Challenges: Non-proficient CRT population: “All Students” FAY/NFAY
Math Reading Math Reading Math Reading3rd 171 108 326 307 282 2554th 92 56 232 269 280 2825th 80 149 273 286 282 3146th 159 209 359 350 344 3887th 172 233 335 314 316 3668th 107 120 345 225 252 184
Grade2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Challenges: Non-proficient EOI population: “All Students” FAY/NFAY
Subject 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10Algebra I 169 125 169English II 201 140 87Algebra II 326 186 346English III 149 180 177Geometry 210 206 205U.S. Hist. 355 236 201Biology I 420 216 176
EOI “cut score” Challenges
Subject 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Algebra I 684 684 700 n/c n/cAlgebra II 696 696 696 700 n/cEnglish III 695 695 695 700 n/cGeometry 695 695 695 700 n/cU.S. Hist. 700 689 689 689 700English II 700 693 693 693 700Biology I 700 691 691 691 700
OPI Standards Phase-In Score Needed for Proficiency