bronkhorst - buddhism in the shadow
Post on 17-Oct-2015
82 views
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
BUDDHISM IN THE SHADOW OF BRAHMANISMTRANSCRIPT
JB-BB 1
27.10.2010
BUDDHISMINTHESHADOWOFBRAHMANISM
by
JohannesBronkhorst
JB-BB 2
27.10.2010
I.INTRODUCTION:BUDDHISMBEFORETHENEWBRAHMANISMThe original context Interactions Imperial help
II.BRAHMANISMII.1ThenewBrahmanismII.2ThespreadofSanskritII.3ThebrahmanicalcolonizationofthepastII.4Thebrahmanizationofborrowedfeatures
III.BUDDHISMCONFRONTEDWITHBRAHMANISM
III.1AcourtlychallengeIII.2ScienceandreligioninclassicalIndiaIII.3AnewlanguageAppendix to chapter III.3: Jainism, Mathur and Sanskrit III.4BuddhistHybridSanskrit,theoriginallanguageIII.5Buddhismsanskritized,BuddhismbrahmanizedIII.6PhilosophicalencountersIII.7TherelicsoftheBuddhaRelic worship What happened to the body of the Buddha? Appendix to chapter III.7: What happened to Mahvras body? III.8AdjustmenttopoliticalrealityReferencesAbbreviationsIndex
JB-BB 3
27.10.2010
I.INTRODUCTION:BUDDHISMBEFORETHENEWBRAHMANISM
The original context
Buddhism,weareoftentold,wasareactionagainstvedicBrahmanism.Vedic
BrahmanismisthereligionthatfindsexpressionintheVeda,animmensecorpus
oftexts.VedicBrahmanism,wearemadetounderstand,ismucholderthan
BuddhismandwasindeedthedominantreligioninnorthernIndia,includingthe
areainwhichBuddhismarose.
Idonotsharethisopinion.Idonotdenythatmanyvedictextsexisted
already,inoralform,atthetimewhentheBuddhawasborn.However,the
bearersofthistradition,theBrahmins,didnotoccupyadominantpositioninthe
areainwhichtheBuddhapreachedhismessage,andthismessagewasnot,
therefore,areactionagainstbrahmanicalthoughtandculture.
IhavearguedthispositionatlengthinabookGreater Magadhathat
cameoutin2007.Inthisintroductionnofulljusticecanbedonetothearguments
therepresented.Inordertounderstandwhatfollows,itisyetnecessarytobe
acquaintedwithsomeofitsfindings.Thesewillherebebrieflyreviewed.Further
information,argumentsandreferencescanbefoundinGreater Magadha.1
WedonotknowexactlywhenthehistoricalBuddhadied.Foralongtime
Buddhistscholarsthoughttheyknew.MostWesternscholarsagreeduponadate
closetotheyear480BCE.Fewscholarsstillacceptthisdate.Astudyinwhich
1GeoffreySamuel,inarecentpublication(2008:48ff.;also61ff.)whichhoweverrefersbacktoanearlierunpublishedmanuscriptofThomasHopkins,presentsonthebasisofprimarilyarchaeologicalevidenceanotionoftwoculturalprocessesmovingmoreorlessconcurrentlytowardtheuseofironandurbanizationfromtwoseparatesources:oneintheeasternPunjab,Rajasthan,theDoab,andnorthwardtotheHimalayaswestof81longitude,identifiedwiththePaintedGreyWarecultureandtheAryans;theotherbasedontheEasternGangeticculturewithitsapparentinitialconnectiontotheMalwa-typeculturalcomplexintheregionofPatna,inthevalleysoftheGhagaraandGandakriversnorthwestofPatna,andwestwardtotheregionaroundthelowerDoab.ThetwoareascorrespondtothosedistinguishedinGreater Magadha.Tothelistofaspectsinwhichthetwoworldsmayhavedifferedfromeachother,Samuel(p.89ff.)addsgenderattitudes.Samuelisnodoubtrightinconcluding(p.343):ItseemstomethataninitialtensionbetweenthevaluesofthevedicsocietyofKuru-PaclaandthoseoftheCentralGangeticregioncanbesensedthroughmuchoftheearlydevelopmentofIndicreligions,andinvariouswayscontinuesintomuchlatertimes.
JB-BB 4
27.10.2010
manyparticipatedhasnotledtoaresultuponwhichscholarsagree.2However,
manyofthemapproveofadatenottoodistantintimefromtheyear400BCE,
giveortakeafewdecadesineitherdirection.400BCEmeansbeforethe
incursionintoIndiabyAlexanderofMacedoniainthesecondhalfofthefourth
centuryBCE,alsobeforethecreationofalargeempireinnorthernIndiabythe
NandasandtheMauryaspresumablyfromthemiddleofthefourthcenturyBCE
onward,andmuchbeforetheSanskritgrammarianPatajali,whomweknowto
havelivedaroundtheyear150BCE.
ThisSanskritgrammarianprovidesuswithsomeinterestinginformation
abouttheheartlandofBrahmanisminhistime.Hecallsitlandoftheryas
(ryvarta),andsituatesinessentiallyintheGangesplain,betweentheThar
desertinthewestandtheconfluenceoftheriversGanges(Gag)andJumna
(Yamun)intheeast.3ExactlythesameexpressionisusedagainintheMnava
Dharmastra,atextthatwascomposedthreetofourcenturieslater.4Here,
however,thelandoftheryas(ryvarta)extendsfromtheeasterntothe
westernsea,andisthereforemuchlargerthanPatajalisryvarta.This
suggeststhatanimportantchangehadtakenplacebetweenthesecondcentury
BCEandthesecondorthirdcenturyCE:TheBrahminsofthesecondcentury
BCElookedupontheeasternGangesvalleyasmoreorlessforeignterritory,the
BrahminsofthesecondorthirdcenturiesCElookeduponitastheirland.
ThischangeconcernstheeastwardspreadofBrahmanism.Thisshouldnot
beconfusedwiththemoveeastwardofindividualBrahmins,eventhoughthetwo
areconnected.Brahminscarrytheclaimofbeingsuperiortoothermembersof
society.AregionthathasanumberofBrahminslivinginitbutwhichdoesnot
recognizetheBrahminsclaimtosuperiorityisnotbrahmanized.Itbecomes
2Bechert,1986;1991;1992;1995;1997.3Interestingly,thejainatext(Bhat-)Kalpastraalsospeaksofryancountries,inthefollowingmanner:MonksornunsmaywandereastwardasfarasAnga-Magadha,southwardasfarasKosamb,westwardasfarasThandnorthwardasfarasKula.Theymaywanderthusfar,(for)thusfarthereareryancountries,butnotbeyondunlesstheDhammaflourishesthere.(Bolle,1998:xxiv).EventhoughitisdifficulttoidentifyTh,itseemslikelythatthejainaryancountrieslaytotheeastofthebrahmanicallandoftheryas.4SeeBronkhorst,forthcoming,foradiscussionofManusdate.
JB-BB 5
27.10.2010
brahmanizedwhenthisclaimcomestobeaccepted.Untilthattimetheregion
concernedisnotbrahmanicalterritory.
Thepassagesconsideredsuggestthattheregioneastoftheconfluenceof
theGagandtheYamunwasnotconsideredbrahmanicalterritoryatthetime
ofPatajali.ThisdoesnotexcludethattherewereBrahminslivingthere.Rather,
itsuggeststhattheBrahminslivinginitdidnotreceivetheesteemwhichthey
deemedthemselvesentitledto.InPatajalisryvarta,ontheotherhand,we
mayassumethattheydidreceivethisesteem,atleasttosomeextent.
TheregioneastoftheconfluenceoftheGagandtheYamunisof
particularinterestforthestudyofBuddhism.ItistherethatBuddhismarose,itis
therethattheBuddhalivedandpreached.Ifthisregionwasnotyetbrahmanical
territoryatthetimeofPatajali,itwascertainlynotbrahmanicalterritoryatthe
timeoftheBuddha,forPatajalilivedtwoortwoandahalfcenturiesafterthe
deathoftheBuddha.ThebrahmanizationoftheeasternGangesvalleyis
thereforeatopicofthegreatestinterestforthestudyofearlyBuddhism.
Thatthisregionwasnotbrahmanicalterritoryduringthecenturies
separatingtheBuddhafromPatajaliissupportedbythelittleweknowaboutits
politicalhistory.Itisherethatthefoundationswerelaidfortheempirethatcame
tocoveralargepartoftheSouthAsiansubcontinent.Ifoursourcescanbe
believed,noneoftherulersinvolvedwereespeciallyinterestedintheBrahmins
andtheirideas.5TheearlykingsofMagadhareikaBimbisraandAjtaatru
areclaimedastheirownbybothBuddhistsandJainas.TheNandas,whomay
haveconsolidatedimperialpoweratPaliputraaround350BCE,appeartohave
beenzealouspatronsoftheJainas.CandraguptaMauryaoverthrewtheNandas,
butmayhavehadnomoreinterestintheBrahminsthanthosewhomhereplaced.
HehimselfissaidtohaveadoptedJainismanddiedajainasaint.Hisson
Bindusraisbelievedtohavepatronizednon-brahmanicalmovements,
particularlythejvikas.AokawasinterestedinBuddhism;hisimmediate
successorsinjvikismandJainism.Itisonlywiththeugas,whosupposedly
5Forfurtherdetails,seethefinalpartofthisintroductionandchapterII.3,below.
JB-BB 6
27.10.2010
wereBrahminsthemselves,6thatBrahminsmayhavebeguntooccupytheplace
insocietywhichtheythoughtwasrightfullytheirs.Thishappenedaround185
BCE.Fortyorfiftyyearslater,Patajalithegrammarianwasstillnotreadyto
lookupontheGangesvalleyeastoftheconfluencewiththeJumnaasbeingpart
ofthelandoftheryas.UntilPatajalisdateandperhapsforsometimeafter
him,oursourcessuggest,theregioneastoftheconfluenceoftheGagandthe
Yamunwasnotbrahmanical.IcallthisareaGreater Magadha.Greater
MagadhacoversMagadhaanditssurroundinglands:roughlythegeographical
areainwhichtheBuddhaandMahvralivedandtaught.Withregardtothe
Buddha,thisareastretchedbyandlargefromrvast,thecapitalofKosala,in
thenorthwesttoRjagha,thecapitalofMagadha,inthesoutheast.Thisareawas
neitherwithoutculturenorwithoutreligion.Itisinthisareathatmostofthe
secondurbanizationofSouthAsiatookplacefromaround500BCEonward.Itis
alsointhisareathatanumberofreligiousandspiritualmovementsarose,most
famousamongthemBuddhismandJainism.Alltheseeventstookplacewithin,
andweremanifestationsof,thecultureofthatpartofnorthernIndia.
Vedicandearlypost-vedicliteraturecontainslittletoinformusaboutthe
cultureofitseasternneighbours.However,apassageoftheatapatha Brhmaa
speaksaboutthedemonicpeopleoftheeastwhowereinthehabitof
constructingsepulchralmoundsthatwereround,unlikethefour-corneredones
usedbythefollowersoftheVeda.Theseconstructionswerenodoubtthe
ancestorsofthestpas,well-knownfromBuddhism.Jainism,too,hadandhasits
stpas,ashadjvikism,itseems.7Wemustconcludethatstpa-like
constructionswereafeatureoffunerarypracticesinGreaterMagadha.
AnotherfeatureofthespiritualcultureofGreaterMagadhaisespecially
important,viz.itssharedspiritualideology.Knowingitisnecessaryifonewishes
tounderstandthebackgroundofearlyBuddhism.Thisideologycomprisedthe
6Foradiscussionoftheevidence,seeTsuchida,2009:14f.Bhandare(2006:97),onthebasisofnumismaticevide