brucella abortus感染による流産におけるrantesの …brucella...
TRANSCRIPT
Brucella abortus感染による流産におけるRANTESの関与
誌名誌名 The journal of veterinary medical science
ISSNISSN 09167250
巻/号巻/号 707
掲載ページ掲載ページ p. 681-686
発行年月発行年月 2008年7月
農林水産省 農林水産技術会議事務局筑波産学連携支援センターTsukuba Business-Academia Cooperation Support Center, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research CouncilSecretariat
FULL PAPER Bacteriology
Regulated upon Activation Normal T-Cell Expressed and Secreted (RANTES)
Contributes to Abortion Caused by Brucella abortus Infection in Pregnant乱1ice
Kenta W ATANABE1), Natsumi 1W A11
), Masato T ACHIBANA 1), Hidefumi FURUOKA2), Hiroshi SUZUKI3) and
Masahisa WATARA11)*
I)Departments of Applied Veterinary Science, 2Jpathological Science and 3JResearch Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro Uniνersity of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan
(Recei ved 17 0巴cember2007/Accepted 25 March 2008)
ABSTRACT. 8rucella abortus (8. abortus) is a facultative intracellular pathogen that can survive inside macrophages and trophoblast giant C巴lls,and the causative agent of brucellosis. [n the present study, we found that production of regulated upon activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) due to 8. abortus infection contributes to abortion in pregnant mice. 8. abortus infected pregnant interferon-y (TFN-y) knockout mice di巴dwithin 15 days of inf,巴ction,but non-pregnant [FN-y knockout mice were still alive. With infec-tion by wild type 8. abortus, a larg巴 amountof RANTES production was observed in pregnant IFN-y knockout mice, and induction of RANTES was also observed in normal pregnant mice infected with the wild typ巴, but not in those infected with the intracellular repli-cation-defective mutant. Production of RANTES and IFN-y were inhibited in mice inoculated with the respective RANTES or [FN-y antibody. Neutralization of RANTES, induced by 8. abortus infection, served to prevent abortion. These results indicate that the pro-duction and function of RANTES are correlated with TFN-y in pregnant mice infected with 8. abortus. KEY WORDS: abortion, 8rucella abortus, IFN-y, RANTES
Brucellosis is a serious debilitating disease in humans and
results in abortion and sterility in domestic animals. The eti-
ologic agents of brucellosis are Brucella spp., small gram-negative and facultative intracellular pathogens that can
multiply within professional and non-professional phago
cytes [8, 9]. 1n contrast to other intracellular pathogens, Brucella species do not produce巴xotoxins,antiphagocytic
capsules or thick cell walls, resistant forms or fimbriae, and
do not show antigenic variation [14]. A key aspect of the
virulence of Brucella is its ability to proliferate within pro-
fessional and non-professional phagocytic host cells,
thereby successfully bypassing the bactericidal effects of
phagocytes, and their virulence and chronic infections are thought to be due to their ability to avoid the killing mecha-
nisms within host cells [20, 28]. Infection in humans is
almost exclusively due to zoonosis, either through direct
contact with infected animals or from contaminated dairy
products [19]. The mouse model, particularly that using the
non-pregnant mouse, has been used extensively to study some aspects of the pathogenesis of brucellosis [11]. While
brucellosis is known to primarily affect the reproductive
tract in the natural host and has been much studied, little is
known regarding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of
Brucella infection in the pregnant mouse [27]. The infec-
tious abortion model using the pregnant mouse is a powerful
tool for investigating the mechanisms of Brucella pathogen-
esis, and in our previous study we demonstrated that B. αbortus causes abortion in pregnant mice by inoculating
bacteria on day 4.5 of gestation [15]. We found that there
* CORRESPONDENCE TO: WATARAI, M., Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of AgricuItur巴,Yamaguchi University,
1677-1 Yoshida, Yamaguchi 735-8515, Japan e-mail:[email protected]
1. Vet. Med. Sci. 70(7): 681-686, 2008
was a higher degree of bacterial colonization in the placenta
than in other organs, that there were many bacteria in tro-
phoblast giant (TG) cells in the plac巴ntaand that an intrac-
ellular replication-defective mutant did not induce abortion.
Transient interferon-y (1FN-y) production induced by infec-
tion with B. abortus also contributes to infectious abortion, and its neutralization served to prevent abortion.
It has been suggested that during normal pregnancy a
shift from a Th 1-to a Th2-polarized immune response
al10ws the survival ofthe fetus [21]. Th2 cytokines such as
TGF-s, 1L-4 and IL-I 0 ar巴 notonly able to prevent immu-
nopathologic events, but also hav巴beneficialeffects in suc-
cessful pregnancy [7]. It has also been suggested that
cytokines and chemokines play a role in the pathogenesis of
idiopathic recurrent spontaneous abortion [7], but their role
in abortion induced by B. abortus infection is still unclear. Regulated upon activation normal T-cell expressed and
secreted (RANTES) is a chemokine that has recently been
implicated in trophoblast and spermatozoa migration in
view of its well-established chemoattractant properties [17,
26]. 1n the present study, we investigated the pathogenesis
of B. abortus-induced abortion in pregnant IFN-y knockout
mjce and noted that RANTES plays an important role in this
process.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains: All B. abortus derivatives were from
544 (ATCC23448) smooth virulent B. abortus biovar 1
strains. Ba598 (544dvirB4) was also used in this study [30, 31]. B. abortus strains were maintained as frozen glycerol
stocks and cultured on Bruc巴lIabroth (Becton Dickinson,
NJ, U.S.A.) or Brucella broth containing 1.5% agar.
K. WATANABE ET AL
mouse RANTES monoclonal antibodies (clone 53405) or
IFN-y monoclonal antibodies (clone HB 170), administering 200μg of the respective antibody in a volume of 0.1 ml
intraperitoneally 24 hr before infection. As a control, mice were inj巴ctedwith 200μg of normal rat IgG in 0.1 ml
according to the same schedule as for the mice treated with
anti-RANTES or antトIFN-ymonoclonal antibodies. Bacte
rial infection was achieved as described abov巴. Blood was
collected at 1,3,5 or 7 days after infection, and serum 1巴velsof RANTES and IFN-y were measured with an ELISA kit as
described above. On day 18.5 of gestation, a judgment was
made as to whether mice were pregnant or not as described
above
Statistical analysis: AII statistical analysis was conducted
using the Student' s t test
B. abortus infection in IFN-y knockout mice: We previ-
ously reported that transient induction of IFNγproduction
is a key event in abortion induced by B. abortus infection
[15]. In order to clarify the contribution of IFN-y to infec-
tious abortion, pregnant IFN-y knockout mice were infected with B. abortus, and abortion rates were examined. As
reported previously, pregnant normal mic巴 remam巴dalive
after B. abortus infection (Fig. IA), but all B. abortus infected pregnant IFN-y knockout mice died within 15 days
of infection (Fig. 1 A). Bact巴rialgrowth was cxamined in
the spleens of infected pregnant IFN-y knockout mice to
determin巴ifbacterial colonization was predominantly in the
spleen. Colonization by B. abortus was much greater in the spleens of pregnant IFN-y knockout mice than in those of
pregnant normal mic巴 (Fig.1 B). B. abortus induced sple-
nomegaly as a consequence of the host inflammatory
response in the pregnant normal mice, but splenomegaly was not induced in the pregnant IFN-y knockout mice (Fig.
LC).
Transient increase in RANTES in pregnant 1 FN-y knock-
RESULTS
682
Mice: Six to ten-week-old BALB/c female mice were
individually mated to 6-to 10-w巴巴k-oldBALB/c male mice.
All of these mice were obtained from CLEA Japan (Tokyo,
Japan). The normal gestational time for these mice is 19
days, and the vaginal plug was observed on day 0.5 of ges-
tation. In addition, six to eight-week-old IFN-y knockout
mice on the BALB/c background were obtained from Jack-
son Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, U.S.A.). The animal
experiments were permitted by Animal Research Commit-
tee of Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary
M巴dicine.
Virulence in pregnant mice: Groups of three or five preg-nant mice were infected intraperitoneal1y with approxト
mately 104 CFU of brucellae in 0.1 ml saline at the indicated
days of gestation [15]. On day 18.5 of gestation or when
mice died, their fetus, placenta, and spleen were removed and homogenized in saline. Tissue homogenates were seri-
ally diluted with PBS and plated on Brucella agar to count
the number of CFU in each organ. Fetuses were determined
to be alive if there was a heartbeat, and dead if there was no
heartbeat.
Cytokine measurement: S巴rumlev巴lsofRANTES, TFN-y
and MCP-I were measured for infected and uninfected vir-
gin and pregnant mice. To achieve infection, groups of five
mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with approximately
104 CFU of brucellae in 0.1 ml saline on day 4.5 of gesta-
tion, and blood was collected at 1, 3, 5 or 7 days after infec-
tion. Blood was collected at the same times for uninfected
mice. On day 18.5 of gestation, uteri were removed, and a
judgment was mad巴 asto whether mice were pregnant or
not. Serum levels of RANTES, IFN-y and MCP-I were
measured with an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) kit (PIERCE Endogen, Rockford, IL, U.S.A.) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The
cytokine antibody array used was obtain巴dfrom RayBio-
tech (Norcross, GA, U.S.A.).
ln vivo deplelion of RANTES and IFN-y: RANTES and
IFN-y were neutralized in the mice through the use of ant卜
c-B A
_¥(0 d時 2、.ν"_'11>
‘~":J$' q'
S
A
-
-
a
u
a
u
a
u
n
u
(gZEo--zoo-aω
0.3
~$..示。d苫q'
。ot ぬがゆv。,可<:'
コ比uaoJ
5 10 15 20
Days after Infectlon
ー・""IF:N“,KIOn棚 w・9n・n'~'F阿国't KIOpr・gn・n'ー・-BALDlc pr.刊 "Int
3
内
4
4
・
00
一Ehosaε=z。
Fig. 1. B.aborlus infection in pregnant IFN-y knockout mice. Pregnant (lFN-y KJO pregnant) and non-pregnant (IFN-y KJO non-pregnant) TFN-yknockout mice and pregnant normal mice (BALB/c pregnant) were infected with B. aborlus. The fig-ure shows number of mice (A), bacterial growth in spleen (B) and spleen weight (C)。
683 RANTES IN INFECTIOUS ABORTION
B n
a
n
z,.‘
t刷
.m
mw問
nH噌
-dt
唱。問
問
np
poo
ぬ
ww
d吋
吋
創刊刊
由回目"阻H
+++
ドト守三弓
別
加(一
Eha)F・aU2
1∞
40
2蜘~A"司、
急15凹Q, 、-ω 凶 1似悶トZ 《巴
7 3 5 Days after infection
20
。5叩
。3 5 7
Days after infection
Fig. 2. lnduction of RANTES in pregnant IFN-y knockout mic巴 byB. abortus infection. RANTES (A), and MCP-I (B) serum lev巴Iswere measured in each mous巴byELlSA at the indicated numbers of days after infection. The means and SE for groups of 5 mice are shown. StatisticaIly significant differences betw巴enpregnant and non-pregnant mice are indicated by asterisks (*, P<O.OI).
-cト nor、-pre宮nant-<>-n。 叩regnant+ WT 一合一 non-pr・g間同 +v;rB4 -・←P問gnantー・-p間宮nant+ WT ー金一 pregnant+ v;rB4
B 1叩
80 *
11 SOOi¥iー唱Fキ
60
40
20
(一
EhSF,aoE
*
-cト non・p同gnantー0-non-pregnant + WT -6--norトP同gnant+ v;rB4 -・ト pragr圃nt一・_pr句闇nt+WTー泊~ pr・gr圃nt+v;rB4
A 1似悶
蜘
側{-Eha)ω凶ト
zdE
4ω
。2ω
。7
Fig. 3. Transient increase in RANTES in normal mice induced by B. aborTus infection. Pregnant and non-pregnant normal mice were infected with wild type (WT) or virB4 mutant (virB4). RANTES (A),
and MCP-I (B) serum levels were measured in each mouse by ELlSA at the indicated numb巴rsof days after infection. The means and SE for groups of five mice are shown. Statistically significant differ-ences between mic巴inf,巴ctedwith and without wild type B. abortus are indicated by asterisks (*, P<O.OI).
3 5 Days after infection
7 3 5
Days after infection
tion due to B. abortus infection, we next examined RANTES production in normal mice with B. abortus infec-tion in detaii. For wild type B. abortus inf,巴ction,RANTES was induced within 3 days of infection in pregnant mice, but the start of induction was 2 days later in non-pregnant mice.
There was no induction of RANTES in pregnant and non-pregnant mice infected with virB4 mutant, which do巴snot have the ability of intraceilular replication (Fig. 3A). No significant MCP-l production was observed in pregnant or non-pregnant mice infected with the wild type or virB4 mutant (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that the type IV secretion system contributes to RANTES production
Preventing abortion by neutralizing RANTES: To deter-mine if abortion is prevented by neutralizing the RANTES produced as a result of bacteriai infection, pregnant mic巴
out and normal mice induced by B. abortus infection: To examine cytokine patterns in B. abortus infected pregnant lFN-y knockout mice, we conduct巴drough screening using a cytokine antibody array. As this showed that RANTES was greatly induced, we decided to determine if RANTES contributes to induction of abortion by B. abortus infection by using ELISA to measure the production of RANTES in pregnant mice. As a resuit, we observed a large amount of induced RANTES production in pregnant IFN-y knockout mice at 3 days after infection with B. abortus, but afterwards RANTES production decreased rapidly (Fig. 2A). No sig-nificant MCP-l production was observed in infected preg-nant IFN-y knockout mice or pregnant normal mice (Fig. 2B).
As these results imply that RANTES contributes to abor-
684 K. WATANABE ET AL.
A t飢IOr・士 _.~ 一・・_pr・gnam+WI
ーて)-non.pr咽nant+ WT
→・←pr,・gnant+WT +・ntl-IFN-y... ,̂ J -0-pr司 nant+ antt.IFN-y _ uuulー喧.-pr司 nant+WT +・nll-RANTES吉 l・--tr-pr司nant+ antl-RANTES
E側)
ω 凶
量制《区
2佃
。3 5
Days after infection
B
句。
q
4
4
E
(-E¥aa叶OF)
ャZL-
。7 3 5
Days after infection 7
Fig.4. Neutralization of RANTES and IFN-y using monoclonal antibodies. RANTES and IFN-y W巴ren巴utralizedin the mice by administering antトmouseRANTES or IFN-y monoclonal antibodies,
respectively, and then the mice wer巴 infectedwith wild type B. abortus (WT). RANTES (A) and IFN-y (B) were measured by ELlSA. The means and SE for groups of 5 mice are shown. Statist卜
cally significant differences between the untreated control and antibody treated mice are indicat巴dby asterisks (*, P<O.O 1)
were inoculated with monoclonal anti-RANTES antibodies
or anti-IFN司 yantibodiesI day before infection with B.αbor-tus. Thereafter, serum levels of RANTES and IFN-y, and
abortion rates were recorded. Induction of RANTES and
IFN-y production was observed within 3 days of infection in
pregnant mice, and this was inhibited by inoculation with
RANTES or IFN-y antibodi巴s,respectively (Fig. 4A and B)
Prior inoculation with anti-RANTES antibodies was also
observed to inhibit abortion as compared to non-inoculated
mice (Fig. 5A). However, there was no significant differ-
ence betwe巴npregnant mice inoculated with anti-RANTES
antibodies and non-inoculated pregnant mice as regards
bacterial growth in the spleen (Fig. 5B).
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we found that RANTES production
contributes to abortion due to B. abortus infection in preg-nant mice. We also noted that the production of RANTES
and IFN-y are influ巴nc巴dby each other in pregnant mice.
Our previous study showed that a transient increase in IFN-
ydu巴toBrucella infection causes abortion in pregnant mice [15]. For many other intracellular bacterial and protozoan
pathogens, it has been shown that IFN-y is an important
compon巴ntof Th 1 immune responses and contributes to
control through its ability to activate macrophages to
enhance microbial killing. The role of IFN-y in the control
of B. abortus infections has been demonstrat巴dby adminis-
tering recombinant IFN-y to BALB/c mice. This tr巴atment
resulted in a 10-fold d巴creasein the number of bacteria at 1
week after infection [24]. Similarly, the neutralization of
endogenous IFN-y through the administration of anti-lFN-y
monoclonal antibodies resulted in a decr巴asein control of B.
abortus infection [35]. IFN-y is important for control of B abortus infection in BALB/c mice during the first week of infection, since an increase in bacteria has been measured in
IFN-y knockout mice at I week post infection [12, I3].
However, by 3 weeks post infection, the number of bacteria
recovered was equivalent regardless of whether IFN-y was
present or not, and BALB/c mice survived for 10 weeks when IFN-ywas knocked out [18].
ln the present study, pregnant lFN-y knockout mice died
within 15 days of B. abortus infl巴ction.Pregnancy leads to a
generalized suppression of the adaptive immune system,
typified by significantly decreased cell-mediated immunity
and reduced Th 1 responsiveness [21, 33, 34], and this
immunosuppressed state prevents matemal rejection of the
fetus but has the unfortunate consequence of increasing
matemal susceptibility to certain infectious agents [16, 23].
This is consider巴dto be the reason that pregnant IFN-y
knockout mice died mor巴rapidlydue to B. abortus infl巴cttOnthan non-pregnant IFN-y knockout mice
Immune cells and their secretory products have be巴nrec-
ognized as important pathophysiological mediators of recur-
rent spontaneous abortions and endometriosis in humans [7,
25,32]. On the other hand, chemokines are involved in T-
cell trafficking during normal processes and also in patho-
logical events such as inflammation and endothelium dam-
age [29]. RANTES is a chemokine that has recently been
implicated in trophoblast and spermatozoa migration in
view of its well-established chemoattractant properties [17,
26]. Th巴 specificability of RANTES to downregulate T-
cell responses suggests it might be relevant for fetal toler-
anc巴 induction,but other than this no role of RANTES in
pregnancy has been established [22]. A recent study
reported that the secretion ofRANTES, macrophage inflam-
RANTES lN INFECTIOUS ABORTION 685
16~ ~14 ~ 12 ~ 10 ち 8
B6 E 4
:i 2 。
ロalivefetus ・abortedfetus 10
Z 伺
~8 .0
E 6 U
2
B
Non-I川f・cled No antlbodles +αRANTES +RallgG virB4 Non-infected (∞nlrol) Infectlo円 相 RANTES
O No antlbodles +αRANTES +同副 IgG
Wlld type infe唱画。n Wild type inf田 tion
Fig. 5. Preventing abortion by neutralizing RANTES. RANTES was neutralized in the mice by administering anti-mouse RANTES mon-oclonal antibodies, and th巴nthey were infected with wild type (WT) or νirB4 mutant (νirB4). The figure shows number of fetuses (A), and bacterial growth in the spl巴enand placenta (B)
matory protein (MIP)ーlα,MIP-I s, and activated-induced, T
cell-d巴rIved,and chemokine-related cytokin巴 (ATAC)in
polyclonally activat巴dNK and T cells was closely associ-
ated with the secretion of IFN-y [10]. RANTES is not only
co-secreted to a great extent with IFN-yat th巴 single-cell
level but also synergize functionally with IFN-y on a com-
mon target population [10]. In lhis s巴nse,th巴 production
and function of RANTES correlate with IFN-y in B. abortus
infect巴dpregnant mice. Further, RANTES may act as a
component of Th 1 immune responses with IFN-y in preg-
nant町lIce.
NK cells are large granular Iymphocytes found in periph-
eral blood and also in the maternal decidua during preg-
nancy. The actions of NK cells on trophoblast lineage cells
are likely mediated by NK cell secretory products, including cytokines, and may be direct or indirect. Uterine NK cells
produce several cytokines and are the primary sourc巴 of
IFN-y in the metrial grand [1,2]. IFN-y has been implicated
as a major mediator of uterine NK cell function during preg-
nancy [3, 4]. Trophoblast cells are among a variety of diι
ferent IFN-y targets, and in vitro trophoblast cell differentiation, survival, and outgrowth are affected by IFN-Y [1,5]. However, th巴 functionof IFN-y is more diverse
than the induction of bact巴ricidalfunction and includes the
stimulation of antigen presentation through class 1 and class
II MHC molecules, the orchestration of leukocyte-endothe-lium interactions, the effects on cell proliferation and apop-tosis, as well as stimulation and repression of a variety of
genes whose functional significance remains obscure [6].
NK cells may play a role in controlling brucellosis in preg-
nant mice and shift from Th2-to Thl-polarized immune
response may induce the abortion by B. abortus infection.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. We thank Dr. Alexander Cox
for his critical reading of the manuscript and Dr. Yoshitaka
Omata for his valuable suggestions. This work was sup-
port巴d,in part, by grants from Program for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Bioscience, and from Scientific Research (19041006 and 18790298), Japan
Society for the Promotion of Scienc巴.
REFERENCES
1. Ain, R., Canham, L.N. and Soares, M.J. 2003. Oestation stage-dependent intrauterine trophoblast cell invas】onin the rat and mouse: novel endocrine phenotype and regulation. Dev. Biol 260: 176-190.
2. Ashkar, A.A. and Croy, B.A. 1999. Interferon-y contributes to the normalcy of murine pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 61: 493-502.
3. Ashkar, A.A. and Croy, B.A. 2001. Functions of uterine natu-ral killer cells are mediated by int巴rferongamma production during murine pregnancy. Semin. Immunol. 13: 235-241
4. Ashkar, A.A., Di Santo, J.P. and Croy, B.A. 2000. lnterferon y contributes to initiation of uterine vascular modification, decid-ual integrity, and uterine natural killer cell maturation during normal murine pregnancy. J. Exp. Med. 192: 259-269
5. Athanassakis, 1., Papadimitriou, L., Bouris, O. and Vassiliadis,
S. 2000. Int巴rferon-yinduces differentiation of ectoplacental cone cells to phenotypically distinct trophoblasts. Dev. Comp lmmunol. 24: 663-672
6. Boehm, U., Klamp, T., Oroot, M. and Howard, J.C. 1997. Cel-lular responses to interferon-y. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15: 749-795.
7. Chaouat, 0., Zourbas, S., Ostoij, S., Lappree-Delage, 0.,
Dubanchet, S., Ledee, N. and Matral, J. 2002. A brief review of recent data on some cytokine expressions at the materno-fetal interface which might challenge the classical Th Irrh2 dichot-
omy. J. Reprod. lmmunol. 53: 241-253 8. Delrue, R.M., Martinez-Lorenzo, M., Lestrate, P., Danese, 1.,
Bielarz, V., Me口ens,P., De Bolle, X., Tibor, A., Oorvel, J.P and Letesson, J.J. 2001. Identification of Brucella spp. genes involved in intracellular trafficking. Cell. Microbiol. 3: 487 497.
9. Detileux, P.O., Deyoe, B.L. and Ch巴ville,N.F. 1990. Entry and intracellular localization of Brucella spp. in Vero cells: fluores-
686 K. WATANABE ET AL.
cence and electron microscopy. Vet. Pathol. 27・317-328
10. Dorner, B.G., Scheffold, A., Rolph, M.S., Huser, M.B., Kauf-
mann, S.H.E., Radbruch, A., Flesch, I.E.A. and Kroczek, R.A.
2002. MTP-Iα,MTP-Is, RANTES, and ATAC/lymphotactin
function together with IFN-yas type 1 cytokines. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 6181-6186 11. Enright, F.M. 1990. The pathog巴nesisand pathibiology of Bru-
cella inf,巴ctionin domestic animals. pp. 301-320. In: Animal
Bruc巴llosis(Nielsen, K. and Ouncan, J.R. eds.), CRC Press,
Boca Raton. FL.
12. Fernandes, O.M. and Baldwin, C.し 1995.江ー10downregu-
lates protective immunity to Brucella abortus. Infect. Immun
63: 1130-1133
13. Fernandes, O.M., Jiang, X., Jung, J.H. and Baldwin, C.L. 1996
Comparison of T cell cytokines in resistant and susceptible
mice infected with virulent Brucella abortus strain 2308.
FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 16: 193-203.
14. Finlay, B. and Falkow, S. 1997. Common themes in microbial
pathogenicity. Microbil)l. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61: 136-169
15. Kim, S., Lee, O.S., Watanabe, K., Furuoka, H., Suzuki, H. and
Watarai, M. 2005. Tnterferon-y promotes abortion due to Bru-
cella infection in pregnant mice. BMC Microbiol. 5: 22
16. Krishnan, L., Guilbert, L.J., Russell, A.S., Wegmann, T.G.,
ルlosmann,T.R. and B巴losevic,M. 1996. Pregnancy impairs
resistance of C57BLl6 mice to Leishmania major infection and causes decreased antig巴n-sp巴cificIFN-gamma response and
increased production ofT helper 2 cytokines. J. Immunol. 156 644-652.
17. Muciaccia, B., Padula, F., Vicini, E., Gandini, L., Lenzi, A. and
Stefanini, M. 2005. Beta-chemokine receptors 5 and 3 are
expressed on the head region of human spermatozoon. FASEB
J.19:2048-2050 18. Mu叩hy,E.A., Sathiyaseelan, J., Parent, M., Zou, B. and Bald-
win, C.L. 200卜Interferon-yis critical for surviving a Brucella
abortus infection in both resistant C57BLl6 mice and suscept卜
ble BALB/c mice. ImmunoLogy 103: 511-518
19. Pappas, G., Papadimitriou, P., Akritidis, N., Christou, L. and
Tsianos, E. V. 2006. The new global map of human brucellosis.
Lancet Infect. Dis. 6: 91-99
20. Pizarro-Cerda, J., Moreno, E., Sanguedolc巴, V., Mege, J.し and
Gorvel, J .P. 1998. Virulent BruceLLa abortus prevents Iysos-
ome fusion and is distributed within autophagosome-like com-
pa此ments.Infect. Immun. 66: 2387-2392
21. Raghupathy, R. 1997. Th 1 type immunity is incompatible with
successful pregnancy.lmmunol. Today 18: 478-482.
22. Rarnhorst, R., Gutierrez, G., Corigliano, A., Junovich, G. and
Fainboim,し 2007
。falloimmune response by progesterone during pregnancy Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 57: 147-152.
23. Sano, M., Mitsuyama, M., Watanabe, Y. and Nomoto, K. 1986.
Tmpairment of T cell-mediated immunity to Listeria monocyto-
genes in pregnant mice. Microbiol. Immunol. 30: 165-176.
24. Stevens, M.G., Pugh Jr., G.W. and Tabatabai, L.B. 1992
Effects of y-interferon and indomethacin in preventing Bru-
cella abortus infections in mice. Infect. Immun. 60・4407-
4409
25. Thellin, 0., Coumans, B., Zorzi, W., Igout, A. and Herinen, E
2000. Tolerance to the foeto-placental“graft": ten ways to sup port a child for nine months. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12: 731-
737.
26. Thirkill, T.L., Lowe, K., Vedagiri, H., Blankenship, T.N., Bar-
必(at,A. and Oouglas, G. 2005. Macaque trophoblast migration
is regulated by RANTES. Exp. CeLL Res. 305: 355-364.
27. Tobias, L., Cordes, D.O. and Schurig, G.G. 1993. Plac巴ntal
pathology of the pregnant mouse inoculated with Brucella
abortus strain 2308. Vet. Pathol. 30: 119-129
28. Ugalde, R.A. 1999. Intracellular lifestyle of Brucella spp. com-
mon genes with other animal pathogens, plant pathogens, and
endosymbionts. Microbes.lnfect. 1: 1211-1219
29. Von Hundelshausen, P., Koenen, R.R., Sack, M., Mause, S.F.,
Andriaens, W., Proudfoot, A.E., Hackeng, T.M. and Weber, C.
2005. Heterophilic interactions of platelet factor 4 and
RANTES promote monocyte arrest on endothelium. BLood
105: 924-930
30. Watarai, M., Makino, S-I. and Shirahata, T. 2002. An essential
virulence protein of BruceLLa abortus, VirB4, requires an intact
nucleoside-triphosphate-binding domain. Microbiology 184: 1439-1446
31. Watarai, M., Makino, S-l., Michikawa, M., Yanagisawa, K.,
Murakami, S. and Shirahata, T. 2002. Macrophage plasma m巴mbranecholesterol contributes to Brucella abortus infection
of mice. Infect. Immun. 70: 4818-4825
32. Wallach, E. 1999. Chemokines and human reproduction. Fer-
tiL. Steril. 71: 983-993
33. Weinberg, E.O. 1987. Pregnancy-associat巴dimmune suppres-
sion: risks and mechanisms. Microb. Pmhog. 3: 393-397
34. Wegmann, T.G., Lin, H., Guilbert, L. and Mosmann, T.R.
1993. Bidirectional cytokine interactions in the maternal-fetal
relationship: is successful pregnancy a Th2 phenomenon?
Immunol. Today 14: 353-356.
35. Zhan, Y. and Che巴rs,C. 1993. Endogenous gamma interferon
mediates resistance to Brucella abortus inf巴ction.Infect
Immun. 61: 4899-4901