bsc - acca net zero - ueno

61
© 2009 Building Science Corporati on 1 Net-Zero Energy Homes: The Basics of What You Need to Know Building Science Corporation Kohta Ueno, Senior Associate The 2010 HVACR & Plumbing Instructor Workshop: Advancing Green Mechanical Concepts March 24-26, 2010

Upload: sriramoju-someshwar-nath

Post on 20-Jul-2016

229 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

net zero

TRANSCRIPT

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

1

Net-Zero Energy Homes:The Basics of

What You Need to KnowBuilding Science Corporation

Kohta Ueno, Senior AssociateThe 2010 HVACR & Plumbing Instructor Workshop:

Advancing Green Mechanical ConceptsMarch 24-26, 2010

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Background

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Definitions• NZE: A building that produces as

much energy in a typical year as it consumes.– Consumes grid power when it needs it– Feed power to grid when it has extra

• ALL energy considered– Electric is not special.

• NOT Zero Carbon, or Zero GHG• NOT off-grid

– Much more difficult

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Why Buildings?• Building Sector is largest energy

consumer and GHG emitter

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

NZE Design Targets• Produce as much as we consume• Production is usually MUCH more

expensive than reducing waste (efficiency/conservation)– Hence the energy demanded by building

should always be reduced, reduced, reduced before adding production

– Check cost of reducing demand vs cost if supplying energy

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Capital Investment vs. Operating Cost

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

0% 100%Energy Savings (%)

Tota

l Ann

ual C

osts

($/y

ear)

mortgage

utility bills

cash flow

1

2

3

4

Fig. 1: Conceptual plot of the path to ZNE.

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

0% 100%Energy Savings (%)

Tota

l Ann

ual C

osts

($/y

ear)

mortgage

utility bills

cash flow

1

2

3

4

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

0% 100%Energy Savings (%)

Tota

l Ann

ual C

osts

($/y

ear)

mortgage

utility bills

cash flow

1

2

3

4

Fig. 1: Conceptual plot of the path to ZNE.

Incremental, Energy Related MortgageCosts

Minimum Cost Point

“Least Cost”Curve

Neutral Cost Point

Source Energy Reduction

All E

nerg

y Re

late

d Co

sts,

$

Underlying Source: Dr Ren Anderson, NREL

Lower cost conservation

Higher Energy costs

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Takeaway Lessons• Conservation measures first! Good

design/orientation, good enclosure (shell), good mechanicals

• Then start adding renewable energy• Insulation has diminishing returns• Renewables can be more cost-effective

than insulation after a point! • Net zero energy: good & noble target,

but out beyond “neutral cost”

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Renewables

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Energy Supply• Renewable energy (RE) or cleaner energy

(CE)• Net Zero currently demands site production

– This eliminates some good economical RE• Common choices

– Photovoltaic: Electricity– Solar thermal Warm / Hotwater– Combined heat and power– Wind electricity

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

• PVphotovoltaic

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Energy Supply (RE)• PV

– Straightforward installation, easy to predict output

– Expensive but electricity is very useful and excess can easily be sent to the grid (grid=battery)

– Rated by peak output under standard solar conditions (“peak Watt” or Wp)

– Costs now $8/Wp (before subsidy) installed

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

• Solar Thermal“hot water”

© 2009Building Science

CorporationBuildingScience.com

Solar thermal• Intermittent source of hot water• Well developed• Requires big storage tanks in

most application• Freezing, over heating, glycol

thickening failures, and low temperature efficiency are issues

• Not the most economically-viable choice ($6-10 K): but if going to net zero…

© 2009Building Science

CorporationBuildingScience.com

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Combined heat and power•Aka “CHP”

•Efficient use of fuel to produce heat & electricity within the building complex (e.g. hospital) or home•Remember: grid ~30% efficient; waste heat = cooling towers, river water•Much lower GHG emissions•Supplies on demand•Ratio of electricity to heat is fixed•Effectiveness varies on case-by-case basis

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Mechanical Systems

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Mechanical SystemsEnergy consuming functions• Heating• Cooling• Domestic Hot Water• Ventilation & Filtration

Fundamental problem: small loads!

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

18

Furnaces• Condensing gas

furnaces: 90%+ AFUE—mature technology

• Sealed combustion

• ECM motors (“variable speed”) reduces fan electrical energy

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

19

Ground-source heat pumps• Uses constant ground

temperature to provide heating & cooling

• Fluid pumped through underground tubes; heat extracted or rejected

• One of the highest efficiency space conditioning systems (measured ~3.5 COP)

• But….

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

20

Ground-source heat pumps• Installed cost of system very high

(drilling ground loops)• Nameplate efficiency < actual efficiency

(previous example: 5 COP rated number)• Pumping energy• Systems with problems—difficult to

diagnose, expensive to fix• Can still suffer from normal ductwork-

based system problems• For small loads, is it worthwhile?

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

• 80% & 90%+ options

• Condensing boilers (90%+)—needs some thinking/design

• Outdoor reset controls for 90%+

• Can’t add cooling

Heating: Hydronic Systems

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

22

Radiators/Radiant Floors

Baseboard radiators

Radiant floor heat

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

23

Mini Splits

Mini-split non-ducted head

Mini-split short ducted system

Mini-split outdoor unit

•Both heating & cooling

•Multi-splits (single outdoor unit)

•Systems with SEER26 and HSPF=11 available

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Mini-Splits Heating/Cooling in Cold Mini-Splits Heating/Cooling in Cold ClimateClimate

•1818 sf house, solar-oriented, superinsulated (12“ spray 1818 sf house, solar-oriented, superinsulated (12“ spray foam walls, R-80 roof), triple glazed windows, very airtightfoam walls, R-80 roof), triple glazed windows, very airtight•Central Massachusetts locationCentral Massachusetts location•Net zero performanceNet zero performance

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

•Provides for both heating & cooling; 11,000 BTU heating loadProvides for both heating & cooling; 11,000 BTU heating load•Installed costs in the 1,818 square foot “Farmhouse” was $6,850Installed costs in the 1,818 square foot “Farmhouse” was $6,850•Two 9,000 BTU heads upstairs, One 12,000 BTU head downstairsTwo 9,000 BTU heads upstairs, One 12,000 BTU head downstairs•Electric heater back up, no heat production below zero degrees outsideElectric heater back up, no heat production below zero degrees outside

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Ventilation

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Need for Ventilation• Greater airtightness for energy

reasons, in net zero houses• Also improves sound, odor, pest

control• But people still stink! (+ activities)• Controlled mechanical ventilation

– Point source control (exhaust fans)– General dilution ventilation

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Air Change Driving Forces

Wind Effect Stack Effect Combustion and Ventilation

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Indoor Air Quality• Pollutant production• Pollutant removal• Dynamic Balance= pollutant level

– Not a IAQ problem if it is not in the air

• Solutions– Reduce pollutant production– Increase pollutant removal

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Ventilation• Given sensible source control, constant

ventilation can dilute pollutants to a low level– Ventilation rates are mostly about odor and

humidity, not oxygen– 7.5 cfm/person + 0.01 cfm / sq ft– Commercial and highrise 15 cfm/person (!)

• Mixing is necessary or separate supply to each room to achieve best IAQ

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Types of Controlled Ventilation Systems

• Exhaust Ventilation• Supply Ventilation• Balanced Ventilation

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Exhaust Only: Depressurize

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

• Lowest cost installed system (typical), but problems associated:

• Carbon monoxide alarms• Lack of filtration

• Dust marking on light carpets• Dirt/grit particles settling on horizontal surfaces

• Lack of distribution• Moisture accumulation and odor buildup in rooms

remote from exhaust fan• Objections to fan noise

Exhaust pros and cons

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Supply Only: Pressurized

Not common, although most commercial buildings have more supply than exhaust

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

35

Plus “fan cycling” controller (runs air handler periodically + motorized damper to prevent overventilation)

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Central fan-integrated ventilation

• “Smart” controller (accounts for previous runtime)

• Set minimum runtime (e.g., 20 min/hour)

• Provides distribution of ventilation air throughout house

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Balanced Supply and Exhaust

Common for commercial solutionsResidential often combine with HRV/ERV

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Balanced Ventilation (with Heat Recovery)

• HRV/ERV• Point exhaust• Fully ducted

(need not be)

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

3911/19/2008

Heat Recovery Ventilation

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Efficient Equipment• HRV/ERV always

– choose better than 1 CFM/Watt (current high end ~2 CFM/Watt)

– Choose > 60% efficient– Right size ventilation!—

overventilation can defeat the benefits of adding heat recovery!

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Humidity

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

4211/19/2008

Recommended Range of Relative Humidity• 25 percent during winter• 60 percent during summer

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Supplemental Humidity Control• Good energy efficient design reduces

sensible cooling loads—insulation, good windows, airtightness

• Latent load remains the same!• Thermostat (temperature control) →

humidity is not controlled• Need supplemental dehumidification

in hot-humid and mixed-humid climates (high performance houses)

• Demonstrated in 20 research housesInformation Sheet 620: Supplemental Humidity ControlRR-0505: Residential Dehumidification Systems Research for Hot-Humid Climates

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

44

Dehumidification High efficiency

supplemental dehumidification options (standalone ducted boxes)

E.g., draw from main space, dehumidified air to supply duct

Humidistat control in main space (near thermostat)

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Combustion Safety

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

4811/19/2008

Combustion Safety• Backdrafting risk in tighter houses• Combustion air should be drawn

from outside (“sealed combustion”)

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Case Study:Westford

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Case Study House (Westford Habitat for

Humanity)• Based on recently-built house• Super-insulated enclosure• Very airtight (1.5 ACH 50)• Best-in-class mechanical systems• Energy Star appliances• Compact fluorescent lighting• No renewable energy added: not NZE

(PVs or solar DHW)

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

51

Westford House Under Construction

Westford House: 1.5 Story Single Family Home with Conditioned Basement (2200 ft2 total)

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

527 October 2008

Enclosure Details

• R-66 roof insulation

• R-45 walls• R-26

basement walls

• R-10 basement slab

• Low e double glazed windows

• 1.5 air changes per hour at 50 Pascals (“ACH50”)

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Mechanical Details 96% AFUE Gas

Furnace, ECM motor 0.82 EF Instantaneous

Water Heater Fantech Energy

Recovery Ventilator (ERV)

MEL reduction 10% 19.3 MBH Heating 13.5 MBH Cooling

54

Instantaneous Water Heater

Fantech ERV

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

0

50

100

150

200

250

Benchm

ark

As-buil

t bas

e

Air Sea

l

R-46 W

all

R-66 R

oof

R-26 B

smt

Triple gl

azed

95%

AFUE

16 S

EERHRV

DHW 0.

82 E

FCFLs

ES App

lianc

es

Smart C

ontro

ls

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (so

urce

ene

rgy)

Heating Cooling Hot Water Lighting Other Reduction 50%

0

50

100

150

200

250

Bench

mark

As-buil

t bas

e

Air Sea

l

R-46 W

all

R-66 R

oof

R-26 B

smt

Triple

glazed

95%

AFUE

16 S

EERHRV

DHW 0.

82 E

FCFLs

ES App

lianc

es

Smart C

ontro

ls

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (so

urce

ene

rgy)

Heating Cooling Hot Water Lighting Other Reduction 50%

0

50

100

150

200

250

Bench

mark

As-buil

t bas

e

Air Sea

l

R-46 W

all

R-66 R

oof

R-26 B

smt

Triple

glazed

95%

AFUE

16 S

EERHRV

DHW 0.

82 E

FCFLs

ES App

lianc

es

Smart C

ontro

ls

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (so

urce

ene

rgy)

Heating Cooling Hot Water Lighting Other Reduction 50%

0

50

100

150

200

250

Bench

mark

As-buil

t bas

e

Air Sea

l

R-46 W

all

R-66 R

oof

R-26 B

smt

Triple

glazed

95%

AFUE

16 S

EERHRV

DHW 0.

82 E

FCFLs

ES App

lianc

es

Smart C

ontro

ls

mill

ion

Btu

/yea

r (so

urce

ene

rgy)

Heating Cooling Hot Water Lighting Other Reduction 50%

53%

Enclosure improvements

Mechanical improvements

Appliance, lights

Parametric Analysis

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Final Points

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

What about LEED?• A green points-based rating system:

energy is only one component• Some serious disappointments in

actual energy performance• USGBC now

requires usage data

• How is the house/building operated?

• ASHRAE 90.1 problems?

Source: BSI-007: Prioritizing Green—It's the Energy Stupid*

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Questions/Comments

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

To Take it Further…

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

Mitsubishi SEZ Ducted Indoor unitsMitsubishi SEZ Ducted Indoor units•Provides for both heating and cooling, 17,000 BTU peak heating loadProvides for both heating and cooling, 17,000 BTU peak heating load•Installed costs in the 4 BR 2,612 square foot “Carlisle” model was $7,600Installed costs in the 4 BR 2,612 square foot “Carlisle” model was $7,600•One 15,000 BTU heads upstairs, One 18,000 BTU head downstairsOne 15,000 BTU heads upstairs, One 18,000 BTU head downstairs•20,000 BTU gas fireplace as back up heating system20,000 BTU gas fireplace as back up heating system

© 2009Building Science

Corporation

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

-5 5 15 25 35 45 55 65

T out (F)

CO

P @

70

F In

terio

r

Threshold COP 16 SEER w Defrost Lo

16 SEER w Defrost Lo Boston Design T

Heat Pump Behavior