bsc dissertation

59
i UNIVERSITY OF CAPE COAST SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURE THE EFFECT OF RATES OF BIOCHAR ADDITIONS ON SOIL NITROGEN DYNAMICS AND YIELD OF LETTUCE (Lactuca Sativa. L.) IN A TROPICAL STAGNIC LIXISOL AMENDED WITH COW MANURE. STEPHEN OWUSU A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURE, UNIVERSITY OF CAPE COAST, IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE IN AGRICULTURE JUNE, 2013

Upload: stephen-owusu

Post on 16-Apr-2017

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: BSc Dissertation

i

UNIVERSITY OF CAPE COAST

SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURE

THE EFFECT OF RATES OF BIOCHAR ADDITIONS ON SOIL NITROGEN

DYNAMICS AND YIELD OF LETTUCE (Lactuca Sativa. L.) IN A TROPICAL STAGNIC

LIXISOL AMENDED WITH COW MANURE.

STEPHEN OWUSU

A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURE, UNIVERSITY

OF CAPE COAST, IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE

AWARD OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE IN AGRICULTURE

JUNE, 2013

Page 2: BSc Dissertation

ii

DECLARATION

Candidate’s Declaration

I, Stephen Owusu, hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my own original

research and that, except for other people’s work which have been duly acknowledged, no

part of this piece of work has been presented for another degree in this university or

elsewhere.

Candidate’s Signature:……………………… Date: ………………………

STEPHEN OWUSU

(STUDENT)

Supervisors’ Declaration

I hereby declare that the preparation and presentation of this dissertation were supervised in

accordance with the guidelines on supervision of thesis laid down by the University of Cape

Coast.

Supervisor’s Signature:………………… Date: ……………………….

DR. KWAME AGYEI FRIMPONG

Page 3: BSc Dissertation

iii

Page 4: BSc Dissertation

iv

ABSTRACT

Overcoming the constraints of soil fertility under tropical conditions is a topical issue

in sustainable agriculture. Biochar addition to soil has been shown to mitigate soil fertility

problems through its positive influence on soil physical and chemical properties in relation to

plant growth, water holding capacity as well as soil nitrogen dynamics.

An incubation experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of corn cob biochar

(pyrolysed at 350oC) and cow manure additions on soil nitrogen dynamics and on yield of

lettuce (Lactuca sativa.L) under controlled conditions on a Stagnic Lixisol. The biochar was

incorporated in the soil at rates of 0, 10, 15 and 20 t ha-1

either alone, or in combination with

cow manure at rates of 0, 0.42, 0.83 and 1.67 t ha -1

. Each treatment was replicated three (3)

times in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD). The biomass yield of lettuce grown in

each treatment for a period of 5 weeks was determined. During the growth of the test crop

selected soil characteristics such as soil pH, soil organic carbon and soil mineral-N were also

measured fortnightly. Total dry matter yield of lettuce was determined at maturity (5 weeks

after transplanting) by oven drying.

Biochar and cow manure additions (both sole and combined) significantly increased

total soil organic C, soil pH and total dry matter yield of lettuce compared to the control

treatment. Addition of biochar solely or in combination with cow manure resulted in higher

NO3-N concentrations, whereas only the sole addition of cow manure gave rise to higher

NH4+N concentrations. Based on the observations, it is recommended that farmers who grow

lettuce on the coastal savannah soil should use a combination of biochar and cow manure

amendments to maximize yields and improve the soil pH and soil organic carbon.

Page 5: BSc Dissertation

v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I am especially grateful to my supervisor, Dr. Kwame Agyei Frimpong of the

Department of Soil Science, University of Cape Coast (UCC), who diligently and patiently

offered constructive comments and valuable suggestions on this piece of work. I appreciate all

the guidance and advice you proffered to me. May God richly bless you. I am also very

grateful to Dr. Daniel Okae-Anti, Dr. Ampofo, and Dr. (Mrs.) Grace Vanderpuije for their

contribution and encouragement.

I acknowledge with special thanks to Mr. Kofi Atiah of the Department of Soil

Science, University of Cape Coast (UCC), who was always there for me from the beginning

to the completion of this piece of work. I am also thankful to Mr. Osei Agyemang and Mr.

Stephen Adu of the Soil Science Laboratory and the Animal Science Department,

respectively, UCC, for making the laboratory analysis very successful for me.

I thank my wonderful mother, Mrs. Martha Takyiwaa, my brothers Mr. Matthew

Sabbi and Julius Acquoco Adjei, my sisters, Mrs. Zippora Takyiwaa, Mrs. Mina Amoah, Mrs.

Emma Gyan and Mrs. Grace Affoah, my nieces, Miss Rita Ofosua, Mavis, Ivy, Esther,

Philipa, Gloria, Perpetua, Genefa, Sandra, and Tracy, my nephews, Enoch, Clement, Reginald

and Melvin for their financial assistance and moral support.

Last but not least, my appreciation goes to Mr. Asare Tetteh Paul, Isaac Owusu-

Ansah, Enoch Boateng, Ellen Kusi, Jonathan Otchie, and everybody who in one way or the

other offered guidance and support to me. May God bless you all.

Page 6: BSc Dissertation

vi

DEDICATION

To God Almighty and to the Memory of my beloved Father, Mr. Emmanuel K. Sabbi.

Page 7: BSc Dissertation

vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONTENT PAGE

DECLARATION ii

ABSTRACT iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv

DEDICATION v

TABLE OF CONTENTS vi

LIST OF TABLES ix

LIST OF FIGURES x

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION 1

1.1: Background of the Study 1

1.2: Problem Statement 3

1.3.1: General Objectives 4

1.3.2: Specific Objectives 4

1.4: Justification 5

CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 6

2.1: The Effect of Biochar on the Nitrogen Cycle 6

2.1.1: Nitrogen Fixation 7

2.1.2: Nitrogen Mineralization 7

2.1.2.1: Aminization 8

2.1.2.2: Ammonification 8

2.1.2.3: Nitrification 8

Page 8: BSc Dissertation

viii

2.1.3: Denitrification 9

2.1.4: Volatilization 9

2.1.5: Immobilization 10

2.1.6: Leaching 10

2.2: Nutrient Content of Biochar 11

2.3: Biochar Effects on Soil pH 11

2.4: Effect of Biochar on Ion Exchange Capacity of Soils 12

2.5: Biochar Effects on Soil Biological Activity 13

2.6: Biochar for Carbon Sequestration 14

2.7: Biochar Effect on Plant Diseases 15

2.8: Effect of Biochar on Plant Growth 16

CHAPTER THREE: MATERIALS AND METHODS 18

3.1: Site Location and Description 18

3.2: Climatic Conditions 18

3.3: Preparation of Biochar for Incorporation into Soil 19

3.4.0: Biochar Characterization 19

3.4.1: pH Determination 19

3.4.2: Total Carbon Determination 20

3.4.3: Total Nitrogen Determination 20

3.5: Treatment and Laboratory Analysis of Cow manure 21

3.6: Soil Sampling 21

3.7: Preliminary Soil Analyses 22

3.7.1: Soil Chemical Properties 22

Page 9: BSc Dissertation

ix

3.7.1.1: Determination of Organic Carbon 22

3.7.1.2: Determination of Total Nitrogen 22

3.7.1.3: Determination of Soil pH 23

3.7.1.4: Determination of NH4+N and NO3

-N

concentrations 23

3.7.2: Soil Physical Properties 24

3.8: Experimental Design 25

3.9: Statistical Analysis 26

CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1: Physico-chemical characteristics of the Soil and

Amendments before the Incubation Experiment 27

4.2: Effect of Biochar and Cow manure Amendments 29

4.2.1: Soil pH 29

4.2.2: Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) 30

4.2.3: Soil Nitrogen Mineralization Dynamics 33

4.3: Dry Matter Yield of Lettuce 37

CHAPTER FIVE: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

5.1: Conclusion 40

5.2: Recommendations 41

REFERENCES 42

Page 10: BSc Dissertation

x

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE

1. Physico-chemical Characteristics of the Soil Sample 27

2. Selected Chemical Properties of Soil Amendments 28

Page 11: BSc Dissertation

xi

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE

1. The Nitrogen Cycle 6

2. Soil pH as affected by Biochar and Cow manure Amendments 29

3. Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) as affected by Biochar and Cow manure31

4. Available Soil N (NH4+N & NO3

-N) concentrations as affected by

Biochar and Cow manure Amendments 2 Weeks after Treatment 33

5. Available Soil N (NH4+N & NO3

-N) concentrations as affected by

Biochar and Cow manure Amendments 5 Weeks after Treatment 34

6. Lettuce Dry Matter Yield as affected by Biochar and

Cow manure Amendments 37

Page 12: BSc Dissertation

1

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

This chapter highlights the background, problem statement, objectives, and justification,

respectively of the study.

1.1 Background of the study

The soil comes first. It is the foundation of farming. Soils with poor fertility

result in poor farming and poor farmer livelihood, but fertile soils result in good

farming and better living conditions. An understanding of good farming therefore,

begins with an understanding of the soil (Ahlgren, 1948). A definitive understanding

of the soil nitrogen dynamics for improvement in crop yield is not a luxury but a

necessity in many regions of the world. Lack of food security is especially common in

sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia with malnutrition in 32 and 22% of the total

population respectively (FAO, 2006). To solve this problem, Glaser et al., (2002a)

recognizes that an intensification of agricultural production on a global scale is a

necessary requirement to secure adequate food supply for an increasing world

population.

In areas with adequate rainfall, crop yields are governed by supply of nitrogen

than by any other nutrient element supplied by the soil. Nitrogen (N) is essential for

the development of field crops. Nitrogen is part of chlorophyll used in photosynthesis

and helps to induce good vegetative growth and deep green colour of plants. It also

improves the quality and quantity of dry matter in leafy vegetables and protein in grain

Page 13: BSc Dissertation

2

crops. When N is deficient, root systems and plant growth are stunted, older leaves

turn yellow and the crop is low in crude protein. Too much N, however, can delay

maturity and cause excessive vegetative growth at the expense of crop yield (Johnson

et al., 2005). Soil nitrogen is of special importance because plants need it in rather

large amount, but it is easily lost from the soil (Silva and Uchida, 2000).

Over the years, numerous efforts have been made to improve soil nitrogen

availability to crops in many parts of the world through addition of soil amendments

such as mulches, composts, manures and fertilizers. Applications of mulches,

composts, and manures have frequently been shown to increase soil fertility, minimize

nutrient leaching and improve soil structure. However, under tropical conditions it is

not uncommon to experience rapid mineralization of organic matter (Tiessen et al.,

1994) and only a small portion of the applied organic compounds will be stabilized in

the soil in the long term, but continually released to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide

(Fearnside, 2000). Although chemical fertilizers are essential to modern agriculture,

their overuse can have harmful effects on plants and crops and on soil quality. In

addition, leaching of nutrients from chemical fertilizers into bodies of water can lead

to water pollution problems such as eutrophication, by causing excessive growth of

vegetation (Odesola and Owoseni, 2010).

In recent times, enhanced soil nutrient availability (especially nitrogen) and the

subsequent improvement in the yield of crops through the addition of biochar to soils

has been demonstrated by research in several areas across the globe. The term

“biochar” was coined by Peter Read to describe fine-grained by-product, high in

organic carbon, made from biological material (biomass), pyrolysed under limited

Page 14: BSc Dissertation

3

supply of oxygen (O2), and at relatively low temperatures (<700°C), used as a soil

amendment to improve soil properties for agricultural purpose (Ernsting and Smolker,

2009).

Previous research has consistently indicated that biochar possesses considerable

potential to enhance long-term soil carbon pool as it has been found to be

biochemically recalcitrant as compared to un-charred organic matter (Lehmann et al.,

2006). In soil, biochar significantly increases the efficiencies of other soil amendments

such as manure, composts, and fertilizers. Thus, biochar addition to soil can reduce the

amount of chemicals needed to enhance crop yields. Research has also revealed that

poor soils amended with biochar promotes higher growth rates and also results in

higher and quality crop yields.

The reasons advanced above justify the need to use biochar as a sustainable soil

amendment that would offer enhanced soil nitrogen availability for increased lettuce

yield.

1.2 Problem Statement

The effect of biochar on crop production depends on the rate of application

(Blackwell et al., 2009). Various studies conducted by previous researchers have

shown that biochar increases crop productivity, yet there is inadequate research

findings to confirm the optimum application rates required for ideal crop productivity

on a specified soil. Determination of the correct application rate suitable for any

particular soil is essential, considering that soil incorporation of some biochars has

been found to adversely affect plant growth. (Kwapinski et al., 2010; Sohi et al.,

Page 15: BSc Dissertation

4

2010). For example, Kwapinski et al. (2010) has reported suppression of plant growth

resulting from soil incorporation of biochar made from miscanthus.

The use of biochar as a soil amendment in Ghana is not widespread.

Productivity of the tropical soils of Ghana is typically constrained by the inherently

low soil fertility status of most soils especially around the coastal savannah zone of the

country. If the limitations posed by low soil fertility are addressed crop productivity

could be significantly increased in the coastal savannah zone. Biochar offers the

potential to improve soil fertility and productivity in this area, but these soils have not

been extensively assessed for their use with biochar as a soil amendment.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

1.3.1 General Objectives

The general objective of this research is to evaluate the effect of different rates

of biochar application on soil N dynamics and on the yield of lettuce grown on a

coastal savannah soil.

1.3.2 Specific Objectives: The specific objectives underlying the study are

as follows:

1. Assess the effect of biochar incorporation on soil NH4+-N and NO3

-N

concentrations.

2. Characterize the soil sample (Benya Series ) for chemical and physical

properties.

3. Characterize the corn cob biochar for physico-chemical properties before soil

Page 16: BSc Dissertation

5

incorporation.

4. Evaluate the effect of the use of corn cob biochar as a soil Amendment on the

yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa.L)

6. Evaluate the impact of combined biochar and cow manure applications on the

yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa.L)

1.4. Justification of the Study

The application of biochar as a sustainable approach for managing soil is a

subject matter of growing interest (Brussaard, 1997 cited by Lehmann et al., 2011).

The interest in biochar research is an important one because biochar is thought to

provide several beneficial effects for its use as soil amendment. Biochar is thought to

help in the development of soil structure and stability, nutrient cycling, soil aeration,

soil water use efficiency, disease resistance, and C storage capacity of soils.

Regardless of the benefits derived from biochar, data on the effect of biochar

application rates on crop yields is still rudimentary, and before large scale deployment

can be considered the application rates of biochar will have to be studied in far more

detail (Woolf, 2008).

This research therefore seeks to provide vital information necessary for

establishing an appropriate application rate of biochar for lettuce production on a

coastal savannah soil in Ghana. The outcome of the study will contribute significantly

to existing literature and inform policy makers and implementers about the appropriate

application rate necessary for large scale deployment of biochar on the Coastal

Savannah Soil in Ghana or elsewhere.

Page 17: BSc Dissertation

6

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 The Effect of Biochar on the Nitrogen Cycle

The N cycle explains how N from sources such as manure, fertilizers and plants

moves through the soil to crops, water and the air. A good understanding of the N

cycle is a necessary first step towards soil N management to meet crop needs while

safeguarding the environment.

FIG. 2.1 The Nitrogen Cycle (Source: http://nmsp.css.cornell.edu)

Page 18: BSc Dissertation

7

In general, the N cycle processes of fixation, mineralization and nitrification

increase plant available N, but processes like - Denitrification, volatilization,

immobilization, and leaching, can result in permanent or temporary N losses from the

root zone.

2.1.1 Nitrogen Fixation

Fixation refers to the conversion of atmospheric N to a plant available form.

DeLuca et al. (2009) explained that biological N2 fixation is exclusively significant in

low-input agro-ecosystems where external N inputs are negligible. Consequently, it is

an indispensable strategy to know whether biochar applications have the capacity to

alter symbiotic or free-living N2-fixing organisms. Rondon et al. (2007) noted that

biochar may stimulate N2 fixation as the result of increased availability of trace metals

such as nickel (Ni), iron (Fe), boron (B), titanium (Ti) and molybdenum (Mo).

Rondon et al. (2007) recommended that in-depth field studies be conducted to

investigate the observed significant improvement in productivity resulting from soil

incorporation of biochar.

2.1.2 Nitrogen Mineralization

Nitrogen mineralization refers to transformation of nitrogen held in organic

forms (such as humus and decaying plant and animal matter) to forms available for

uptake by plant roots; namely ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3

-). Mineralization

consists of two major transformations that are catalyzed by different groups of biota.

Page 19: BSc Dissertation

8

2.1.2.1 Aminization:

Protein + R-NH2 + CO2 + (NH2)2C=O + Energy

Aminization is the first process of mineralization and consists of numerous

reactions of organic compound decomposition accomplished by heterotrophic

microbes (bacteria and fungi)

2.1.2.1 Ammonification:

The breakdown of organic forms of nitrogen to ammonium.

R-NH2 + H2O R-OH + NH3 + Energy

NH3 + H2O NH4+ + OH

-

Ammonification is a biotic process that is principally driven by heterotrophic

bacteria and a variety of fungi (Stevenson and Cole, 1999).

2.1.2.2 Nitrification

Nitrification is the process by which microorganisms convert ammonium to

nitrate to obtain energy. Nitrate is the most plant available form of N, but is also

highly susceptible to leaching losses (Johnson et al., 2005).

2NH4+ + 2O2 2NO2

- + 2H2 + 4H

+

2NO2- + O2 2NO3

-

DeLuca et al. (2009) postulated that biochar increases nitrification rates in

natural forest soils that have very low natural nitrification rates. Conversely, in

NH2

H

COOH R C

Page 20: BSc Dissertation

9

agricultural soils, which already have appreciable rates of nitrification, the effect of

biochar on nitrification was rather minimal. DeLuca et al. (2009) explained further

that biochar additions to agricultural soils decreased apparent ammonification rates

probably due to adsorption of NH4+ onto biochar surface and subsequently reducing

the concentration of NH4+ in the soil solution. In another instance, Granatstein et al.

(2009) found that addition of biochar to soils led to a decrease in soil nitrification and

a decrease in the amount of nitrogen available to plants.

2.1.3 Denitrification

Denitrification occurs when N is lost through the conversion of nitrate to

gaseous forms of N, such as nitric oxide, nitrous oxide and dinitrogen gas; usually in

poorly drained soils where the bacteria use nitrate as an oxygen source. Biochar is

thought to be able to catalyze the reduction of nitrous oxide to nitrogen gas, by

completing denitrification process and reducing the amount of nitrous oxide (an

important greenhouse gas) entering the atmosphere (DeLuca et al., 2009; Van Zwieten

et al., 2009).

2.1.4 Volatilization

Volatilization is the loss of N through the conversion of ammonium to ammonia

gas, which is released to the atmosphere. The volatilization losses increase at higher

soil pH and when high concentrations of NH4+ are present (Stevenson and Cole,

1999), and conditions that favor evaporation such as hot and windy climate (Johnson

et al.,2005). Biochar is thought to reduce the potential for ammonia volatilization,

Page 21: BSc Dissertation

10

because it decreases available ammonium in the soil solution and moderately raises

the pH of soils; both conditions which do not favour ammonia formation and

volatilization (Van Zwieten et al., 2009). Biochar and biochar mixed with ash have the

potential to raise the pH of acid soils (Glaser et al., 2002a), but not to a level that

would increase volatilization (Stevenson and Cole, 1999). Biochar additions to

agricultural soils have been found to reduce NH4+ concentrations, which could be a

result of volatilization; but it is more likely that surface adsorption of NH4+

(Le Leuch and Bandosz, 2007) reduces soil NH4+ concentrations and reduces the

potential for NH3 volatilization.

2.1.5 Immobilization

Immobilization refers to the process in which nitrate and ammonium are taken

up by soil organisms and therefore become unavailable to crops. Immobilization is the

reverse of mineralization. Incorporation of materials with a high carbon to nitrogen

ratio (e.g. sawdust, straw, etc.), will increase biological activity and cause a greater

demand for N, and thus result in N immobilization. Immobilization only temporarily

locks up N so that the microorganisms die, the organic N contained in their cells is

converted by mineralization and nitrification to plant available nitrate (Johnson et al.,

2005).

2.1.6 Leaching

Leaching is a pathway of N loss of a high concern to water quality. Soil

particles do not retain nitrate very well because both are negatively charged. As a

Page 22: BSc Dissertation

11

result, nitrate easily moves with water in the soil. The rate of leaching depends on soil

drainage, rainfall, amount of nitrate present in the soil, and crop uptake (Rowell,

1994).

2.2 Nutrient Content of Biochar

DeLuca et al. (2009) documented that during pyrolysis, volatilization of some

nutrients occurs especially at the surface of the biochar material, while other nutrients

become concentrated in the remaining biochar. Hence, biochar is somewhat depleted

in N and slightly depleted in S relative to more thermally stable nutrients. The N

content of high-temperature biochar is exceptionally low because N is the most

sensitive of all macronutrients to heating (Tyron, 1948 cited by DeLuca et al., 2009).

Generally, there seems to be a decrease in the extractable concentrations of NH4+ and

PO43-

with increasing pyrolysis temperature during biochar production, with a portion

of NH4+ being oxidized to a small exchangeable NO3

- pool at higher temperatures

(Gundale and DeLuca, 2006).

Adding biochar to soil ensures a moderate contribution of nutrients, which is

relatively influenced by the nature of the feedstock (i.e. wood or manure) and the

temperature at which the material is pyrolysed (Bridle and Pritchard, 2004). Biochar

may strategically act as a soil conditioner and driver of nutrient transformations rather

than being primary source of nutrients (Glaser et al., 2002a).

Page 23: BSc Dissertation

12

2.3 Biochar Effects on Soil pH

Numerous studies have demonstrated that biochar can modify soil pH, normally

by increasing pH in acidic soils (Matsubara et al., 2002). There are few, if any, studies

that have demonstrated a reduction in pH with biochar addition in alkaline soils,

however, the addition of acid biochar to acidic soils has been observed to reduce soil

pH (Cheng et al., 2006). An increase in pH associated with adding biochar to acid

soils is due to an increased concentration of alkaline metal (Ca2+

, Mg2+

and K+) oxides

in the biochar and a reduced concentration of soluble soil Al3+

(Steiner et al., 2007).

Adding these alkaline metals, both as soluble salts and associated with biochar

exchange sites, is likely the single most significant effect of biochar on P solubility,

particularly in acidic soils where subtle changes in pH can result in substantially

reduced P precipitation with Al3+

and Fe3+

.

Lehmann et al. (2011) explained that biochars with high mineral ash content

have greater pH values than those with lower ash contents and that pH of biochar also

increases with greater pyrolysis temperature. They recognized that the pH of biochars

may change over time and either decrease or increase depending on type of feedstock

used. For example, Nguyen and Lehmann (2009) observed a pH decrease with

mineral-poor oak wood biochar from pH 4.9 to 4.7, but an increase with mineral-rich

corn stover biochar from pH 6.7 to 8.1 over the course of one year incubation. Cheng

et al. (2006) expounded that the driving force behind a pH decrease is oxidation of C

to form acidic carboxyl groups, whereas, Lehmann et al. (2011) proposed that the

increase in pH is possibly associated with the dissolution of alkaline minerals.

Page 24: BSc Dissertation

13

2.4 The Effect of Biochar on Ion Exchange Capacity of soils

High temperature (800°C) biochar demonstrated higher pH, electrical

conductivity (EC) and extractable NO3- relative to low temperature (350°C) biochar

(Gundale and DeLuca, 2006). The biochemical basis for the high CEC is not fully

understood, but is likely due to the presence of oxidized functional groups (such as

carboxyl groups), whose presence is indicated by high O/C ratios on the surface of

charred materials following microbial degradation (Liang et al., 2006) and is further

influenced by the great surface area (Gundale and DeLuca, 2006) and high charge

density of biochar (Liang et al., 2006). In addition to directly releasing soluble P,

biochar can have a high ion exchange capacity (Liang et al., 2006), and may alter P

availability by providing anion exchange capacity or by influencing the activity of

cations that interact with P. It has been demonstrated that fresh biochar has an

abundance of anion exchange capacity in the acid pH range (Cheng et al., 2008),

which can initially be in excess of the total cation exchange capacity of the biochar.

2.5 Biochar Effects on Soil Biological Activity

Soils can be viewed as complex communities of organisms which are

continually changing in response to soil characteristics and climatic and management

factors, especially the addition of organic matter (Thies and Rillig, 2009). Biochar

addition to soils can stimulate microorganism activity in the soil, potentially affecting

the soil microbiological properties (Hammes and Schmidt, 2009). Rather than

supplying microorganisms with a primary source of nutrients, biochar is thought to

improve the physical and chemical environment in soils, providing microbes with a

Page 25: BSc Dissertation

14

more favourable habitat (Krull et al., 2010). Biochar, because of its porous nature,

high surface area and its ability to adsorb soluble organic matter and inorganic

nutrients, provides a highly suitable habitat for microbes. This is true for bacteria,

actinomycete and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from which some types may

preferentially colonize biochars depending on its physico-chemical properties. Biochar

pores may act as a refuge for some microbes, protecting them from competition and

predation. Microbial abundance, diversity and activity are strongly influenced by pH.

The soil buffering capacity imparted by biochar cation exchange capacity may help

maintain appropriate pH conditions and minimize pH fluctuations in the microhabitats

within biochar particles. Biochar is relatively stable and has long soil residence times,

which suggests that biochar is not a good substrate (food) for soil biota. However,

biochars freshly added to soils may contain suitable substrates to support microbial

growth. Depending on feedstock type and production conditions, some biochars may

contain bio-oils or recondensed organic compounds which could support the growth

and reproduction of certain microbial groups over others. The implications of this are

that microbial communities in biochar will change over time once it has been added to

the soil (DeLuca et al., 2009).

2.6 Biochar for Carbon Sequestration

Baldock and Smernik (2002) reported that soil incorporation of biochar does

not only avoid adverse environmental impact but also constitutes a net sink of

atmospheric carbon dioxide. This means that biochar additions to soil not only reduce

carbon dioxide emissions from energy production, but it is also a form of carbon

Page 26: BSc Dissertation

15

burial, which constitutes a net withdrawal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

There is a high theoretical potential to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions

through the use of biochar sequestration in combination with bioenergy, but this needs

to be vetted against economic realities (Lehmann, 2007).

Ornstein et al. (2009) proposed a rather drastic but theoretically effective way

of using photosynthesis to draw down atmosphere carbon dioxide with biochar

addition to soils because it will benefit the farm economy of those farmers who

sequester the carbon. It has also been documented that the effectiveness of using

biochar as an approach to mitigate climate change rests on its relative recalcitrance

against microbial decay and thus on its slower return of terrestrial organic carbon as

carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere (Lehmann, 2007).

2.7 Biochar Effect on Plant Diseases

For over a century ago, farmers have reported of the indirect effect of biochar-

type materials on suppressing plant diseases. For instance, potato rot or rust and

mildew (Allen, 1846 cited by Lehmann et al., 2011) and isolated studies have

observed reduced damping off (caused by various pathogens) after additions of

charcoal (Retan, 1915). It has been proposed that the effect of biochar may be

analogous to compost in suppressing plant diseases, thought little direct

experimentation has been conducted so far. The following are some principal

mechanisms proposed by (Hoitink and Fahy, 1986; Noble and Coventry, 2005), which

is somewhat proven for compost, and which may also be applicable to biochar. These

include (1) a direct release of inhibitors of plant pathogens; (2) the promotion of

Page 27: BSc Dissertation

16

microorganisms that act antagonistic to pathogens, such as parasites, through

production of antibiotics, or by successful competition for nutrients; (3) improved

plant nutrition and vigor, leading to enhanced disease resistance; and (4) activation of

plant defense mechanisms (induced systemic resistance) by enhancing certain

microorganisms. Added to the aforementioned mechanisms is that the known strong

sorption of organic compounds onto biochar may modify signaling between plant and

pathogens, or affect the mobility and activity of the pathogen itself (Lehmann et al.,

2011).

Matsubara et al. (2002) reported that Fusarium infection of asparagus was

found to decrease after addition of coconut biochar and was similar to the benefits

derived from manure made from coffee residue. A decrease in Fusarium infection of

asparagus was also reported after addition of biochar made by fast pyrolysis of wood

powder (Elmer and Pignatello, 2011). Elmer and Pignatello (2011) therefore proposed

the following explanation for their observed decline in Fusarium infection of

asparagus. In this case, biochar may have adsorbed allelopathic compounds in replant

soil such as coumaric, caffeic and ferulic acids which led to a measurable increase in

mycorrhizal infection. Also, greater AM abundance may have led to suppression of

the disease. For soil-borne root diseases, it is also conceivable that biochars reduce

compounds in the soil solution that would otherwise facilitate the ability of pathogens

to detect and infect roots.

Page 28: BSc Dissertation

17

2.8 Effects of Biochar on Plant Growth

With the modification to soil characteristics described above, the effect of

biochar additions to soil on plant productivity is the most important outcome for its

use in agriculture. Evidence gathered from both glasshouse and field trials indicates

that biochar additions to acidic and nutrient poor soils, combined with fertilizer

application, can produce yields greater than either fertilizer or biochar alone.

However, the effect of biochar on crop growth depends on application rates and the

soil type to which it is applied. A key feature of biochar addition to soils is increased

nitrogen use efficiency by plants (Sparkes and Stoutjesdijk, 2011).

Page 29: BSc Dissertation

18

CHAPTER THREE

MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1 Site Location and Description

The research was undertaken at the School of Agriculture Teaching and

Research Farm, University of Cape Coast, in the Central Region of Ghana. The land is

gently sloping and forms part of the Edina series. The Teaching and Research Farms

and the Technology village are both located within longitude 0.30W and Latitude

0.50N and the area is about 1500m - 3000m above sea level (Meteorological Services

Dept. UCC, 2010).

The soil used in the study, the Benya series, classified as Stagnic Lixisol

(WRB), is located at the lower slope of the Edina toposequence. The top soil (0 – 15

cm) sample used for the study is very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) in colour. The

Benya series is developed from colluvium derived from conglomerates of sandstone,

shale and mudstone over a Sekondian deposits with medium internal drainage and

moderate permeability (Agyarko-Mintah, 2008).

3.2 Climatic Conditions

The Edina toposequence, to which the soil used in the study belongs, lies in the

dry-equatorial climate. The area has a bimodal rainfall pattern; between the peaks of

rainfall is a short dry spell that occurs in August. The major raining season start in the

middle of March. It peaks in June and end in July. The minor rainy season start in

Page 30: BSc Dissertation

19

September, peaks in October and ends in November. The dry season start from

November and ends in February. The mean annual rainfall is between 750mm-

1500mm. The area also experience uniform high temperature through the year with a

mean annual maximum of about 28oC and a humidity which ranges between 85–95%

in the morning and about 70% in the afternoon (Meteorological Services Dept. UCC,

2011).

3.3 Preparation of Biochar for Incorporating into Soil

The feedstock (corn cobs) used for biochar preparation was obtained from the

University of Cape Coast Research and Teaching Farms. Five (5) Lucia biomass

pyrolytic stoves - Top Lit-up Draft (ETHOS, 2009) were obtained from the Soil

Science Laboratory of the School of Agriculture, and the feedstock was subjected to

pyrolysis at 350ºC to produce the biochar. The corn cob biochar was ground,

thoroughly mixed and oven-dried at 65°C till constant weight and sieved through a 2

mm sieve. The biochar (< 2mm) was retained in a labeled polythene bags for

laboratory analysis.

3.4.0 Biochar Characterization

3.4.1 pH Determination

Five (5) grams of sieved biochar was weighed into a 50 ml centrifuge tube and

20 ml of distilled water was added to make a biochar-water suspension. Three

replicates of the biochar-water suspension were shaken on a mechanical shaker for 15

minutes. The pH of each suspension was recorded with a Suntex 701 Model pH Meter

Page 31: BSc Dissertation

20

after it had been calibrated with potassium hydrogen phthalate, and potassium

dihydrogen orthophosphate and disodium hydrogen orthophosphate (Rowell, 1994).

3.4.2 Total Carbon Determination

Total carbon content in the corn cob biochar was determined by following the

ashing method described by Mclaughlin (2010). Briefly, three crucibles containing

five grams of biochar were placed in a pre-warmed furnace and the temperature set at

550 °C. The ashing process was left to complete overnight. The crucibles with the

ashes were allowed to cool. After cooling, the masses of each crucible in addition to

the ashes were weighed and recorded. Total carbon determination was calculated as

follows:

% C =

Where:

W1= wet weight of biochar and porcelain crucible (grams)

W2= dry weight of biochar and porcelain crucible (grams)

W3= weight of porcelain (grams)

3.4.3 Total Nitrogen Determination

The Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen content of the corn cob biochar was determined

following the method described by Rowell, (1994). Briefly, a sample of biochar

weighing 0.2 g was digested with conc. H2SO4-H2O2 mixture in a Tecator Digester

Page 32: BSc Dissertation

21

2012. A blank digest was also prepared. Twenty milliliters of the digest was distilled

into a 100 ml conical flask containing 2% boric acid. The distillate was titrated against

M HCl from the initial green colour to pink. The titre values were recorded and

used in the calculations.

3.5 Treatment and laboratory analysis of Cow manure

Cow manure used in the study was obtained from the cattle kraal at the School

of Agriculture Farms, University of Cape Coast. It was air-dried for 3 days after which

it was sieved through a 2 mm sieve before a representative sample was used in the

experiment. The pH, total N and organic C carbon concentrations in the cow manure

were determined using similar procedures as described for biochar.

3.6 Soil Sampling

The topsoil layer (0 – 15cm) was randomly sampled at twenty points on the site

and bulked to form a composite sample. The soil sample was air-dried for 3 days,

ensuring that the soil sample was not contaminated with any non-soil material. After

air-drying, the soil was crushed with porcelain pestle and sieved through a 2 mm

sieve. The fine earth fraction (<2mm) was used for laboratory analysis and pot

experiments.

Page 33: BSc Dissertation

22

3.7 Preliminary Soil Analyses

The physical and chemical properties of the soil were determined at the Soil

Science Laboratory of the School of Agriculture, University of Cape Coast between

October 2012 and February 2013.

3.7.1 Soil Chemical Properties

Sub samples from the composite sample were analyzed to determine the soil pH

and concentrations of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (N),

Nitrate Nitrogen (NO3-N), Ammonium Nitrogen (NH4+-N), respectively.

3.7.1.1 Determination of Organic Carbon

Organic carbon was determined by the Walkley – Black method described by

Rowell (1994). Briefly, 0.5g of the soil sample was wet combusted with Normal

K2Cr2O7 solution and conc. H2SO4. Using diphenylamine indicator the unreduced

K2Cr2O7 was back-titrated with Ammonium Ferrous solution. A blank titration was

carried also carried out.

3.7.1.2 Determination of Total Nitrogen

The Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen content of the soil sample was determined from

the method described by Rowell, (1994). Briefly, a sample of biochar weighing 0.5 g

was digested with conc. H2SO4-H2O2 mixture in a Foss Tecator Digester 2012. The

determination also involved preparation of a blank digest. Twenty milliliters of the

digest was distilled into a 100 ml conical flask containing 2% boric acid. The distillate

Page 34: BSc Dissertation

23

was titrated against M HCl from the initial green colour to pink. The titre values

were recorded and used in the calculations.

3.7.1.3 Determination of Soil pH

Ten grams of the soil sample was weighed into a centrifuge tube and 25ml of

distilled water was added to the soil in the centrifuge tube to obtain a 1 : 2.5 ratio, soil

: water suspension. The suspension was shaken intermittently for 10 minutes. The

suspension was then allowed to stay undisturbed for 15 minutes. The electrodes of a

Suntex 701 pH meter were dipped into the supernatant to determine the pH of the soil.

(The initial pH of the soil sample was obtained to be 5.1)

3.7.1.4 Determination of NH4+N and NO3

-N

The concentrations of NH4+N and NO3

-N were determined from the method

described by Rowell, (1994). Briefly, 10g of freshly sampled moist soil was shaken

with 40ml of 2M KCl for 1hr after which the suspension was filtered through a

Whatmann No. 42 filter paper. The mineral-N content of this extract was then

determined by steam distillation.

Ammonium – N: Twenty (20) ml of the extract was pipetted into the steam

distillation flask with 10 ml of fresh boric acid solution in the receiving flask inserted

under the condenser of the steam distillation apparatus. After a drop of octan-2-ol and

0.5g of MgO had been added to the extract, steam was passed through the apparatus

and 40 ml of the distillate was collected. The NH4+N receiving flask was removed and

Page 35: BSc Dissertation

24

retained for titration after the steam line had been disconnected. Another receiving

flask was again placed under the condenser for analysis of NO3-N.

Nitrate- N: Half a gram (0.5g) of Devarda’s alloy was added to the extract in

the distillation flask and the steam line was immediately reconnected to distill a

further 40 ml of distillate. The NO3-N receiving flask was also retained for titration.

Each distillate was titrated against 0.01 M HCl using a methyl red-bromocresol

green indicator solution. The procedure also involved carrying out a blank

determination. The titre values were recorded and used in the calculation.

3.7.2 Soil Physical Properties

The procedure described by Anderson and Ingram (1993) for non-stony soil

was used to determine the bulk density of the soil. The moist soil cores were oven-

dried at 105°C until a constant weight was obtained. The dry bulk density was

calculated from the formula:

Pb =

Where, Pb is the bulk density (g cm-3

),

W1 is the mass (g) of the metal cylinder,

W2 is the mass (g) of the metal cylinder plus the oven-dried soil,

and V is the volume (cm3) of the metal cylinder.

Particle size distribution was determined using the Bouyoucos Hydrometer

method (Anderson & Ingram, 1993). Distilled water was added to the air-dried soil

Page 36: BSc Dissertation

25

sample, followed by 20 ml of 30 % H2O2 to digest the organic matter. The mixture

was heated in a boiling water bath and amyl alcohol was added to minimize frothing.

Complete dispersion was achieved by adding 2 g of sodium hexa-metaphosphate. The

suspension was shaken and transferred into a one-litre sedimentation cylinder. The

suspension was shaken vigorously and both hydrometer and thermometer readings

taken at 40 s and 5 hr.

3.8 Experimental Design

The effect of different rates of biochar additions on the N mineralization

dynamics and yield of lettuce was investigated in Completely Randomized Design

(CRD), with biochar and cow manure as the experimental factors. This incubation

experiment included a total of sixteen completely randomized treatments in triplicates

(16 x 3). The biochar and cow manure treatments used in the study were as follows:

T0 = CONTROL (soil only)

T1 = Biochar Treatment 1 (10 t ha -1

)

T2 = Biochar Treatment 2 (15 t ha -1

)

T3 = Biochar Treatment 3 (20 t ha -1

)

T4 = Cow manure Treatment 1 (0.42 t ha -1

)

T5 = Cow manure Treatment 2 (0.83 t ha -1

)

T6 = Cow manure Treatment 3 (1.67 t ha -1

)

T7 = 10 t ha-1

Biochar + 0.42 t ha-1

of Cow manure

T8 = 10 t ha-1

Biochar + 0.83 t ha-1

of Cow manure

T9 = 10 t ha-1

Biochar + 1.67 t ha-1

of Cow manure

Page 37: BSc Dissertation

26

T10 = 15 t ha-1

Biochar + 0.42 t ha-1

of Cow manure

T11 = 15 t ha-1

Biochar + 0.83 t ha-1

of Cow manure

T12 = 15 t ha-1

Biochar + 1.67 t ha-1

of Cow manure

T13 = 20 t ha-1

Biochar + 0.42 t ha-1

of Cow manure

T14 = 20 t ha-1

Biochar + 0.83 t ha-1

of Cow manure

T15 = 20 t ha-1

Biochar + 1.67 t ha-1

of Cow manure

The above mentioned amendments were thoroughly mixed with the air-dried

soil (except the control), and packed into plastic cylindrical pots (127 cm3) to attain a

bulk density of approximately 1.3 g/cm3. All the pots were then wetted using distilled

water. The lettuce seedlings were transplanted into pots two weeks after germination

(at 2 seedlings per pot and thinned to one). The pots were placed individually in

shallow trays and watered regularly to maintain water content at approximately 60 %

of Field Capacity using distilled water, by mass balance until maturity of the plants.

The plants were harvested at 5 weeks after transplanting (WAT) and the total dry

matter of the lettuce was determined by oven drying the biomass at 60°C till constant

weight.

3.9 Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using GenSTAT 12.1 (VSN International Ltd, 2009)

and the results have been presented in bar charts.

Page 38: BSc Dissertation

27

CHAPTER FOUR

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Physico-chemical Characteristics of the Soil and Amendments before the

Incubation Experiment

The physico-chemical characteristics of the soil, cow manure and biochar samples

used in the study have been summarized in Tables 4.1 and 4.2

Table 4.1: Physico-chemical Characteristics of the Soil Sample

Soil properties (0-15cm) Value ± SEM Inference

Physical properties

Particle size distribution

Sand (%)

Silt (%)

Clay (%)

Bulk Density (g/cm3)

Electrical conductivity

Chemical properties

pH (H2O)

Organic carbon (%)

Organic matter (%)

Total nitrogen (%)

71.20

2.20

26.60

1.55

0.00

5.10

2.20 ± 0.07

3.80 ± 0.12

0.66 ± 0.03

SANDY CLAY LOAM

Page 39: BSc Dissertation

28

The soil sample was found to be a moderately acidic, with a pH of 5.1 and bulk

density of 1.55g/cm3. It had a total nitrogen, organic carbon and organic matter

content of 0.66%, 2.20% and 3.80% respectively (Table 4.1).

Table 4.2: Selected Chemical Properties of Soil Amendments

Amendment pH

(H2O)

TN

(%) C (%) C:N

EC

(mS/cm)

Biochar (CC)* 8.6 0.58 94.62 163.13 01.6

Cow manure

(CD) 8.4 1.31 5.88 4.48 04.6

*CC = Corn Cob, TN = Total Nitrogen, TC = Total Carbon,

EC = Electrical Conductivity

The nutrient and chemical properties of biochar and cow manure are shown in

Table 4.2. Biochar recorded a pH of 8.6, total nitrogen of 0.58%, total carbon of

94.62%, C:N ratio of 163.13 and electrical conductivity of 01.6 mS/cm. Also, cow

manure recorded a pH of 8.4, total nitrogen of 1.31%, total carbon of 5.88%, C:N ratio

of 4.48 and electrical conductivity of 04.6 mS/cm. The C:N ratio of biochar was very

high and this may suggest a possibility of immobilization of N by microbes, whereas

the low C:N ratio for cow manure is likely to favour net N mineralization of soil N.

Page 40: BSc Dissertation

29

4.2 Effects of Biochar and Cow manure Amendments on Soil Properties

4.2.1 Soil pH

FIG 4.1 Soil pH as affected by Biochar and Cow manure Amendments. Error bars

denote ± 1S.E.M

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T13 T14 T15

So

il p

H a

t 5

week

s a

fter T

rea

tmen

t

Biochar and Cowdung Treatments

Page 41: BSc Dissertation

30

Results obtained from this experiment have shown that biochar addition

increased soil pH in all the treatments. However, while the pH of all the biochar

amended soils were significantly higher (P< 0.05) than the control there was no

significant difference among the different biochar rates (10 t ha-1

, 15 t ha-1

, 20 t ha-1

)

of treatments. This observation is in accordance with the view expressed by Sparkes

and Stoutjesdijk (2011) that high pH biochars may not have a big impact on the pH of

soils to which they are added and further ascribed this phenomenon to the acid

neutralizing ability of biochar. This suggests that there could only be a marginal

reduction of soil acidity in response to the incorporation of high pH biochar. The acid

neutralizing ability of biochar could result from a possible adsorption of cations such

as Al3+

onto biochar surfaces, hence, reducing exchangeable (Al3+

and H+) acidity of

the soil.

Addition of cow manure at all rates (0.42 t ha-1

, 0.83 t ha-1

, 1.67 t ha-1

)

increased pH of the soil above the control, but there was no significant differences in

soil pH between the rates of cow manure treatments. This means that although

addition of cow manure as a nutrient enhancer can give an added benefit of raising soil

pH, the effect did not vary with the rate of cow manure added. The increase in pH

after cow manure application was explained by Lekasi et al. (2005) to be due to the

production of ammonia resulting from deamination of proteins. Also, the combined

effect of biochar and cow manure treatments increased pH of the soil above the

control, but the increase in pH was not significantly different from the rise in soil pH

observed in the sole biochar or cow manure treatments (FIGURE 4.1).

Page 42: BSc Dissertation

31

4.2.2 Soil Organic Carbon (SOC)

FIG 4.2 Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) as affected by Biochar and Cow manure

Amendments. Error bars denote ± 1 S.E.M

The soil organic carbon content increased significantly following the

application of biochar and cow manure treatments. The results showed that soil

organic carbon concentrations in the sole biochar, sole cow manure and combined

biochar and cow manure were significantly higher (p<0.05) than in the control

Page 43: BSc Dissertation

32

(FIGURE 4.2). When considered alone, there was a trend of increasing soil organic

carbon concentrations with increasing rates of biochar addition to the soil. The soil

organic carbon concentration measured in the 20 t ha-1

biochar treatment was

significantly higher (p<0.05) than in the 10 t ha-1

and 5 t ha-1

biochar treatments. This

finding agrees with Lehmann et al., (2011) who suggested that biochar has a great

potential for carbon sequestration in soil. Lehmann et al., (2011) found that the soil

organic carbon (SOC) increased markedly with increasing rate of biochar application.

Lal (2004) also concludes that the use of biochar to improve soil organic carbon

concentration is a sustainable strategy in any situation to conserve or promote soil

health.

Steiner et al, (2007) also suggested that the addition of manure with biochar to

soil offers the potential to increase bioavailability of organic C in the soil solution.

Increased bioavailability of organic C has implication for environmental quality,

especially in the presence of nitrate-N. According to DeLuca et al, (2009) the

abundance of available C and NO3- (terminal electron acceptor) in the soil could

increase denitrification potential and hence N2O emissions in mineral soils amended

with a mixture of biochar and manure.

Page 44: BSc Dissertation

33

4.2.3 Soil Nitrogen Mineralization Dynamics

FIG 4.3 Available Soil N (NH4+N & NO3

-N) concentrations as affected by

Biochar and Cow manure Amendments 2 Weeks After Treatment.

Error bars denote ± 1 S.E.M

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

T0

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8

T9

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14

T15

Available

Soil N

Conce

ntr

ati

ons

(mg N

kg

-1)

at

the 2

nd W

eek

of

Tre

atm

ent

Biochar and Cow dung Treatments

NH4-N

NO3-N

Page 45: BSc Dissertation

34

FIG. 4.4: Available Soil N (NH4+N & NO3

-N) concentrations as affected

By Biochar and Cow manure Amendments 5 Weeks After

Treatment. Error bars denote ± 1 S.E.M

The concentrations of soil mineral N (NO3- and NH4

+) remained low in the

control treatment throughout the experimentation (FIGURE 4.3 and FIGURE 4.4),

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10T11T12 T13T14T15

Avail

able

Soil

N c

once

ntr

ati

ons

(mg N

kg-1

) at

5 w

eek

s

aft

er

Tre

atm

en

t

Biochar and Cow dung Treatments

NH4-N

NO3-N

Page 46: BSc Dissertation

35

which is indicative that net N mineralization in the coastal savannah soil prior to the

addition of biochar and/or cow manure was minimal. On the other hand, laboratory

analysis of all the soil samples that received biochar and cow manure treatments

revealed a significant (P<0.05) increase in available N (NO3-N and NH4

+-N)

concentrations of the soil above the control treatment. This suggests that addition of

biochar and cow manure amendments stimulated N mineralization on the coastal

savannah soil. Although the high C:N ratio (about 163:1) corn cob biochar could

decrease N mineralization in the coastal savannah soil, it did not proof to be true with

this experiment most probably because of the tendency for mineralization to increase

even with the addition of a high C:N ratio biochar. Zackrisson et al. (1996) explained

that there is a rapid response of the nitrifier community toward addition of biochar to

soils with low nitrification activity because biochar is capable of absorbing inhibitory

compounds in the soil environment and hence allow nitrification to continue.

Therefore, in this study incorporation of biochar could have increased the nitrifier

population. (Glaser et al., 2002a) also reported that due to its high surface area,

biochar may offer a suitable habitat for the proliferation of microbes. Furthermore,

Stevenson and Cole, (1999) noted that autotrophic nitrifying bacteria are favoured by

less acidic soil conditions. This suggests that the modifying effect of biochar on the

soil pH in this experiment possibly stimulated the proliferation of the nitrifier

community resulting in an enhanced cow manure mineralization rate. In contrast to the

results from this experiment, Tammeorg et al. (2010) argued that biochar additions

decreased the mineral N concentrations in all treatments when softwood chips biochar

was added to a sandy loam soil. They further explained that the reduction in NO3-N

Page 47: BSc Dissertation

36

concentrations following incorporation of high quantities of biochar could be due to N

immobilization by microbes rather than denitrification.

In this study, NO3-N concentration was moderately high in the combined cow

manure and biochar treatments two weeks after incubation (FIGURE 4.3), but

increases in NO3-N concentration measured between 2

nd and 5

th weeks after incubation

were marginal (FIGURE 4.3 & 4.4). DeLuca et al. (2006) have explained that

combined application of biochar and organic N inputs such as cow manure often result

in net N nitrification, but the addition of organic N without biochar resulted in high

rates of NH4+N production that were not immobilized probably due to a lack of

surface adsorption of NH4+ onto biochar surface.

Experimental results indicated that NH4+N

concentrations increased steadily in

cow manure treatments up to the fifth week of incubation (FIGURE 4.3 & 4.4). At the

second week after incubation, NH4+N

concentration was highest (P < 0.05) in the 10 t

ha-1

biochar + 1.67 t ha-1

cow manure treatment. However, by the 5th

week after

incubation, NH4+N concentrations were high only in the sole cow manure treatments,

showing a decreasing trend of T6 > T5 > T4. In other treatments, NH4+N

concentrations decreased at week 5 after incubation compared to those measured at the

2nd

week after incubation, respectively. The low NH4+N concentrations measured in

these treatments (at the 5th

week after incubation) could be attributed to an increased

nitrification of NH4+N over time or adsorption of ammonium onto biochar surfaces.

The observed trends in NH4+N and NO3

-N dynamics with time are consistent with

earlier reports by Gundale and DeLuca, (2006) and Tammeorg et al. (2010) who

reported that ammonium concentrations remained low whereas nitrate dominated the

Page 48: BSc Dissertation

37

mineral N pool with 97-100% share in all experimental treatments with respect to

biochar addition to soil in an incubation experiment.

4.3 Effects of Biochar and Cow manure Amendments on Dry Matter Yield

of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) at 5 Weeks after Transplanting (WAT)

FIG 4.5 Lettuce Dry Matter Yield as affected by Biochar and

Cow manure Amendments. Error bars denote ± 1 S.E.M

Page 49: BSc Dissertation

38

The application of biochar and cow manure amendments to the soil had showed

a significant impact on the dry matter yield of lettuce in that significantly higher

(P<0.05) dry matter contents were measured in the biochar and cow manure

treatments than in the control (FIGURE 4.5). In this study, dry matter content was

highest in lettuce plants that received a combination of biochar and cow manure

treatments at rates of 15 t ha-1

and 0.42 t ha-1

respectively.

The sole biochar treatments resulted in significant increases in dry matter yield

of lettuce but the dry matter yield decreased with increasing rates of added biochar (T1

> T2 > T3). Increases in yields resulting from biochar application to soil have also been

documented by several researchers. For instance, when comparing maize yields

between disused charcoal production sites and adjacent fields in Kotokosu watershed

in Ghana, Oguntunde et al. (2004) found that grain yield was 91% better and dry

matter yield, 44% higher than in the control treatment. In another instance, Atiah,

(2012) observed an initial increase in dry matter yield of lettuce in an Oxisol amended

with biochar at rates of 0% to 3%, but afterwards a decline in dry matter yield was

found in treatments amended with biochar rates of 4% to 5%. He attributed the

increases in total dry matter yield to biochar’s ability to modify the soil pH from 3.73

to 5.69, and improved the N and P availability in the soil. Further, he attributed the

decline in dry matter yield from the 4 and 5% biochar treatments to P fixation at high

pH levels. This report suggests that incorporation of lower rates of biochar to soil may

lead to an increase in the yield of crops, but larger quantities of biochar could rather

result in yield decline.

Page 50: BSc Dissertation

39

The influence of rates of cow manure application on dry matter yield was

significant. The results indicated that sole cow manure addition produced significantly

higher (P <0.05) dry matter yield than in the sole biochar treatment (FIGURE 4.5).

This observation is in agreement with by Masarirambi et al. (2010) who reported a

significant increase in the growth and yield of lettuce when cattle manure was

incorporated into the soil.

One of the most significant findings in this study is the effect of combined

biochar and cow manure addition on dry matter yield of lettuce (FIGURE 4.5). It was

observed that the highest dry matter yield of lettuce was obtained from the

incorporation of a mixture of biochar and cow manure at lower rates of 15 t ha-1

and

0.42 t ha-1

respectively. This observation may suggest that after the addition of a

mixture of biochar and cow manure amendments to the soil the biochar improved the

soil physical, chemical and microbial environment for enhanced absorption of

nutrients (from cow manure amendment) by the lettuce plants. The enhanced

absorption of nutrients by the lettuce plants could also be due to improved mycorrhizal

association with the roots of the plants resulting from the addition of biochar to the

soil.

Page 51: BSc Dissertation

40

CHAPTER FIVE

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1 Conclusion

The influence of rates of biochar and cow manure incorporation on some

physical properties (pH, organic carbon and N mineralization dynamics) of a coastal

savannah soil was assessed in this study. The effect of the above mentioned soil

amendments on lettuce dry matter yield was also assessed. Consequently, the

following conclusions were established at the end of the study:

1. Addition of biochar or cow manure either alone or in combination moderately

raised the pH of the Coastal Savannah Soil.

2. Soil organic carbon (SOC) increased considerably with increasing rates of biochar

addition to the soil.

3. Addition of biochar resulted in higher NO3-N concentrations than NH4

+N

concentrations while incorporation of sole cow manure resulted in higher NH4+N

concentration than NO3-N concentration.

4. Lower rates of biochar (10 t ha-1

and 15 t ha-1

) resulted in higher dry matter yield

of lettuce, but the highest rate of biochar (20 t ha-1

) resulted in a lower lettuce

biomass yield.

5. For higher dry matter yield of lettuce, a combination of biochar and cow manure

at rates of 15 t ha-1

and 0.42 t ha-1

is agronomically viable.

Page 52: BSc Dissertation

41

5.2 Recommendations

Based on the findings of the study, the following recommendations have been

suggested:

1. Further studies should be carried out to determine the mechanism by which

biochar increases the pH of the Coastal Savannah Soil.

2. Another research is needed to determine nitrification and ammonification rates on

the Coastal Savannah Soil.

3. Another study is necessary to assess the presence of chemicals such phenols in the

Coastal Savannah Soil and how these phenolic compounds inhibit net N

mineralization of the soil.

Page 53: BSc Dissertation

42

REFERENCES

Agyarko-Mintah, E., (2008). ‘Land Use Potential of a Gleysol.’ Unpublished Thesis submitted

to the Department of Soil Science, University of Cape Coast, pp. 80-83.

Ahlgren, H. L. (1948). “First, the Care of the Soil” Corn Belt and Lake States, pp 423 – 425.

Anderson, J. & Ingram, J. (1993). ‘Tropical soil biology and fertility.’ A handbook of methods.

UK : CABI.

Atiah, K., (2012). ‘Evaluation of Local Feedstocks for Biochar Production and Potential Use of

It as Soil Amendment for Lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L.) Production.’ Unpublished Thesis

submitted to the Department of Soil Science, University of Cape Coast, pp 60 – 63

Baldock, J. A., & Smernik, R. J. (2002). Chemical composition and bioavailability of thermally

altered Pinus resinosa (Red pine) wood. Organic Geochemistry 33: 1093-1109.

Blackwell, P., Riethmuller, G. &Collins, M. (2009). ‘Biochar application to soil’, in Lehmann,

J & Joseph, S, Biochar for environmental management: science and technology,

Earthscan, United Kingdom: 207–26.

Bridle, T. R. & Pritchard, D. (2004). ‘Energy and nutrient recovery from sewage sludge via

pyrolysis’,Water Science and Technology, vol 50, pp169–175.

Cheng, C., Lehmann, J., Thies J. E., Burton, S. D. & Engelhard, M. H. (2006). ‘Oxidation of

black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes’,Organic Geochemistry, vol. 37, pp1477–

1488

Cheng, C. H., Lehmann, J. & Engelhard, M. H. (2008). ‘Natural oxidation of black carbon in

soils: Changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence’,

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol 72, pp1598–1610

Page 54: BSc Dissertation

43

DeLuca, T. H., MacKenzie, M. D., Gundale, M. J. & Holben, W. E. (2006). ‘Wildfire-

produced charcoal directly influences nitrogen cycling in forest ecosystems’, Soil

Science Society America Journal, vol 70, pp448–453

DeLuca, T. H., MacKenzie M. D., & Gundale M. J., (2009). ‘Biochar Effects on Soil Nutrient

Transformations’ ES_BEM_13-1 Retrieved from http://216.194.248.126/projects/book

Ernsting, A. & Smolker, R. (2009). Biochar for Climate Change Mitigation : Fact or Fiction?

Retrieved from http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/docs/biocharbriefing.pdf.

Elmer, W.H. & Pignatello, J.J., (2011). Effect of biochar amendments on mycorrhizal

associations and Fusarium crown and root rot of asparagus in replant soils. Plant

Disease published online.

ETHOS, (2009) . Retrieved from: http://www.biochar-international.org/stoves/ethos

FAO, (2006). ‘The State of Food Insecurity in the World,’ FAO, Rome, available at

www.fao.org/docrep/009/a0750e/a0750e00.htm, accessed on August 7, 2008

Fearnside, P. M. (2000) Global warming and tropical land-use change: greenhouse gas

emissions from biomass burning, decomposition and soils in forest conversion, shifting

cultivation and secondary vegetation. Climatic Change 46:115–158

Glaser, B., Lehmann, J. & Zech W (2002a). ‘Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of

highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal’—a review. Biology and Fertility of

Soils, 35, 219–230.

doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4.

Granatstein, D., Kruger, C.E., Collins, H., Galinato, S., Garcia-Perez, M., & Yoder, J. (2009).

‘Use of biochar from the pyrolysis of waste organic material as a soil amendment’ final

Page 55: BSc Dissertation

44

project report, Centre for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources, Washington

State University, Wenatchee, WA.

Gundale, M. J., & DeLuca, T. H. (2006). ‘Temperature and substrate influence the chemical

properties of charcoal in the ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir ecosystem’, Forest Ecology and

Management, vol 231, pp86–93

Hammes, K., & Schmidt, W. I., (2009). ‘Changes of biochar in soil’, in Lehmann, J. & Joseph,

S., Biochar for environmental management: science and technology, Earthscan, United

Kingdom: 169–82.

Hoitink, H.A.J., & Fahy, P.C., (1986). ‘Basis for the control of soil-borne plant pathogens with

composts.’ Annual Review of Phytopathology 24, 93e114.

Johnson C., Albrecht G., Ketterings Q., Beckman J., & Stockin K. (2005). ‘Nutrient

Management Spear Program’ Agronomy Fact Sheet Series http://nmsp.css.cornell.edu

Accessed on 22nd

January, 2013.

Krull, E., Singh., B., & Joseph, S. (2010). ‘Preface to special issue: proceedings from the First

Asia- Pacific Biochar Conference, 2009, Gold Coast, Australia’, Australian Journal of

Soil Research 48(6–7)

Kwapinski, W. Byrne, C. M. P. Kryachko, E. Wolfram, P. Adley, C. Leahy, JJ. Novotny, E. H.

& Hayes, M. H. B. (2010). ‘Biochar from biomass and waste’, Waste Biomass Valor 1:

177–89.

Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security.

Science 304:1623–1627

Page 56: BSc Dissertation

45

Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., & Rondon, M., (2006). ‘Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial

ecosystems’ – a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11,

403 – 427

Lehmann, J. (2007). ‘Biochar for mitigating climate change: carbon sequestration in the black’,

US-Ithaca (NY), pp 1-3.

Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C. & Crowley, D. (2011).

‘Biochar effects on soil biota’- A review. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 43 (2011)

1812e1836

Lekasi, J.K., Nmanure’u, K. W., & Kifuko, M. N. (2005). ‘Organic Resource Management in

Kenya’. Perspective and Guidelines. Forum for organic resource management and

Agricultural Technologies.(FORMAT).

Le Leuch, L. M., & Bandosz, T. J., (2007). ‘The role of water and surface acidity on the

reactive adsorption of ammonia on modified activated carbons’ Carbon, vol 45, pp568–

578

Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Kinyangi, J., Grossman, J., O’Neill, B., Skjemstad, J.O.,

Thies, J., Luizão, F.J., Petersen, J., & Neves, E.G., (2006). ‘Black carbon increases

cation exchange capacity in soils.’ Soil Science Society of America Journal 70, 1719 –

1730

Masarirambi, M. T., Hlawe, M. M., Oseni,

O. T., & Sibiya, T. E. (2010).‘Effects of organic

fertilizers on growth, yield, quality and sensory evaluation of red lettuce’ (Lactuca

sativa L.) ‘Veneza Roxa’ Agric. Biol. J. N. Am., 1(6):1319-1324

Matsubara, Y., Hasegawa, N., & Fukui, H. (2002). ‘Incidence of Fusarium root rot in asparagus

seedlings infected with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus as affected by several soil

Page 57: BSc Dissertation

46

amendments.’ Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 71, 370 and

374.

Mclaughlin, H. (2010). ‘Characterizing Biochars prior to Additions to Soils-Version I’

(January, 2010). Alterna Biocarbon Inc.

Nguyen, B. T. & Lehmann, J. (2009). Black carbon decomposition under varying water

regimes. Organic Geochemistry, 40, 846–853. doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.05.004.

Noble, R. & Coventry, E. (2005). ‘Suppression of soil-borne plant diseases with composts’ - a

review. Biocontrol Science and Technology, pp3 – 20.

Odesola, I. F. & Owoseni, and T. A. (2010). ‘Small Scale Biochar Production Technologies.’ A

Review, Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS) 1

(2): 151-156.

Oguntunde, P., Fosu, M., Ajayi, A. & van de Giesen, A., (2004). “Effects of charcoal

production on maize yield, chemical properties and texture of soil”, Biology and

Fertility of Soils 39: 4

Ornstein, L., Aleinov, I. & Rind, D. (2009). Irrigated afforestation of the Sahara and Australian

outback to end global warming. Climate Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9626-y

(Cornell- Lehmann 2009 Biological Carbon sequestration

Retan, G. A. (1915). ‘Charcoal as a means of solving some nursery problems’, Forestry

Quarterly, vol 13, pp25-30

Rondon, M. A., Lehmann, J., Ramirez, J., & Hurtado, M., (2007). ‘Biological nitrogen fixation

by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions.’ Biology

and Fertility of Soils, pp43, 699.

Page 58: BSc Dissertation

47

Rowell, D. L. (1994). Soil Science: Methods and Applications, Longman Group UK Limited,

pp 48 - 227.

Silva, J. A., & Uchida, R. (2000). College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources,

University of Hawaii at Manoa, Essential Nutrients for Plant Growth: Nutrient

Functions and Deficiency Symptoms

Sohi, S. P., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R., (2010). ‘ A review of biochar and its use and

function in soil’, Advances in Agronomy 105: 47–82.

Sparkes, J & Stoutjesdijk, P. (2011). ‘Biochar: implications for agricultural productivity.’

ABARES technical report 11.6, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource

Economics and Sciences, Canberra, pp 13 – 21.

Steiner, C., Teixeira, W.G., Lehmann, J., Nehls, T., de Macedo, J. L.V., Blum, W. E. H. &

Zech, W. (2007). ‘Long term effects of manure, charcoal, and mineral fertilization on

crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil’,

Plant and Soil, vol 291, pp275–290

Steiner, C., Garcia, M., & Zech, W., (2009). ‘Effects of charcoal as slow release nutrient carrier

on N-P-K dynamics and soil microbial population’ – pot experiments with ferralsol

substrate. Wim Sombroek’s Vision. Springer, Berlin, pp. 325-338.

Stevenson, F.J. & Cole, M.A. (1999). ‘Cycles of the Soil,’ second edition, John Wiley and

Sons, Inc, New York, NY

Tammeorg, P., Brandstaka, T., Simojoki, A. & Helenius, J. (2010). “Nitrogen mineralization

dynamics of meat bone meal and cattle manure as affected by the application of

softwood chips biochar in soil” pp 1 – 7.

Page 59: BSc Dissertation

48

Thies, J. E., & Rillig, M. C., (2009). ‘Characteristics of Biochar: Biological Properties’, in

Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S., Biochar for environmental management: science and

technology, Earthscan, United Kingdom, 85–105.

Tiessen, H., Cuevas, E. & Chacon, P. (1994). ‘The role of soil organic matter in sustaining soil

fertility.’ Nature, 371, 783–785.

Van Zwieten, L., Singh, B., Joseph, S., Kimber, S., Cowie, A., & Chan, K. Y. (2009). ‘Biochar

and emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases from soil’, in Lehmann, J. & Joseph, S., -

Biochar for environmental management: science and technology, Earthscan, United

Kingdom: 227–50.

Walkley, A., & A., Black, (1934). An examination of the degtrareff method for determining soil

organic matter and a proposed modification of the chronic acid titration method. Soil

Science., 37: 29-38.

Woolf, D., (2008). ‘Biochar as a soil amendment’ - A review of the environmental implications:

Retrieved from: http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/SCM-30.pdf

Zackrisson, O., Nilsson, M. C. and Wardle, D. A. (1996). ‘Key ecological function of charcoal

from wildfire in the Boreal forest’, Oikos, vol 77, pp10–19