Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 1

Attempting to cause a person to do something by telling that person that such action is required by law, when it is not required by law, may be a felony. 18 USC §242 provides that whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. 18 USC §245 provided that Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, intimidates or interferes with any person from participating in or enjoying any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; [or] applying for or enjoying employment, or any perquisite thereof, by any agency of the United States; shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. 42 USC §1983 provides that every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. Warning, you may be in violation of Federal Law and persisting with your demand may lead to your arrest and/or civil damages! Also understand that the law provides that you can be held personally responsible and liable, as well as your company or agency. You are advised to cease and desist with your demand and to seek personal legal counsel if you do not understand the law. Public Domain—Privacy Form COL(01)

None of the Buczeks had done anything that should have merited scrutiny from the police—let alone the abusive treatment they received at the hands of "Buffalo's finest." Detective Edward Cotter's interest in the Buczeks was purely personal.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 2

COLOR OF LAW http://miami.fbi.gov/statutes.htm

Daniel Richard Buczek Shane Christopher Buczek

C/o P.o. Box 93 Derby, New York Republic

EXEMPT 716.947.5384 HOME

716.947.5949 OFFICE RE: FALSE ARREST BY ED COTTER AND Incarceration without warrant damages at the rate of $ 78,000.00 per hour: See Trezevant Vs. Miami for illegal unlawful incarceration without due process. Note James C, Trezevant, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. CITY OF TAMPA, a municipal Corporation, et Hillsborough County Board of Criminal Justice See Nos. 83-3370,83-3038,a/k/a 741 FEDERAL REPORTER 2D 336…. ALSO See USC 50 Sec. 501-593 Estimated Damages for relief of Unlawful Incarceration ONLY: Per: Estate of Macias vs Lopez. in that case. Trezevant vs. City of Tampa Daniel Richard Buczek 12 days for Amount of $ 22,464,000.00 Federal Reserve Notes Shane Christopher Buczek 76 days for Amount of $ 142, 272,000.00 Federal Reserve Notes TO: MAYOR BYRON BROWN 201 CITY HALL BUFFALO NEW YORK [14202]

This letter is lawful notification to you, pursuant to The Bill of Rights of the National Constitution, in particular, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Ninth Amendments, and The Bill of Rights of the New York Constitution, in particular, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4,5,6,7,8, 9,10, 17 and 18, and pursuant to your oath, and requires your written response to me specific to the subject matter. Your failure to respond, within 30 days, as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity, everything in this letter with which you disagree is your lawful, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true, correct, legal, lawful and binding upon you, in any court, anywhere in America, without your protest or objection or that of those who represent you. Your silence is your acquiescence. See: Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law.” Also, see: U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” Corrupt cop poorly judges Liberty Dollar!

None of the Buczeks had done anything that should have merited scrutiny from the police—let alone the abusive treatment they received at the hands of "Buffalo's finest." Detective Edward Cotter's interest in the Buczeks was purely personal.

Most of the FBI's color of law investigations would fall into five broad areas: · excessive force; · sexual assaults; · false arrest/fabrication of evidence; · deprivation of property; and · failure to keep from harm. · Lack of supervision/monitoring of officers' actions. · Officers not providing justification or reporting incidents involving the use of force. · Lack of, or improper training of officers. · A department having a citizen complaint process which treats complainants as adversaries.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 3

ED COTTER IS VERY CORRUPT! MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE BUFFALO POLICE DEPARTMENT! Constitution. Section. 6. The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place. No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. Section. 4.The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. What does that mean, they can only receive money for the FEDERAL TREASURY, IT cannot increase and they cannot hold a CIVIL office while holding a public VOTED office. A Judge does not have immunity because a Judge is not required to attend session. Bill Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998 by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228–206 vote) and obstruction of justice (by a 221–212 vote). Two other articles of impeachment failed—a second count of perjury in the Jones case (by a 205–229 vote), and one accusing President Clinton of abuse of power (by a 148–285 vote). He was acquitted by the Senate. Did any governmental authority commit perjury? Did any governmental authority lie to a jury? Did any governmental authority commit obstruction of justice? Did any governmental authority commit abuse of power? Daniel R Buczek Shane C. Buczek PO Box 93 Po Box 93 7335 Derby Rd 7335 Derby Rd Derby, New York 14047 Derby, New York 14047 716-947-5949 716-947-5384 danb@buczek-inc.com www.buczek-inc.com Section. 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marqué and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

Alleged Violations (stack charges by Ed Cotter Buffalo Detective) Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 4

Color of law Violations Per STATE law enumerating my federal rights.

PL 170.30 POSSESS FORGED INSTRUMENT- N 05-3600620 dropped! On 260215 COL PL 24.26-01 HARASSMENT-2ND: PHY CONTA N 05-3600620 reduced COL PL 190.26-01 CRIM IMPERS-1ST: POLICE OFFIC N 05-360020 reduced COL EVENTS On Monday evening December 26th, 2005 we (the Buczek family) went to a hockey event those in our group 8 in all included: 1.) Amanda L. Buczek PO Box 93, Derby NY 14047 2.) Adam J. Buczek PO Box 93, Derby NY 14047 3.) Caleb D Buczek PO Box 93, Derby NY 14047 4.) Joel Lattuca Lancaster, NY 14086 5.) Amanda L. Burke Angola, NY 14006 6.) Ashley Heinrich Lakeview, NY 14085 7.) Shane C Buczek PO Box 93, Derby NY 14047 8.) Daniel R Buczek PO Box 93, Derby NY 14047 We entered the HSBC Arena to enjoy a hockey game at 6:27pm. My daughter Amanda and her boyfriend went to buy a beer and a hot dog and offered to pay for them with the silver liberties {www.libertydollar.org} they had. The counter person said they do not accept them, so my daughter (Amanda) and her boyfriend (Joel) paid with FRNS (Federal Reserve Notes are the currency we use today). The security people were summoned and were told someone was trying to pass off counterfeit money as real money. One individual came to our section; which was in Section 316 rows 3 and four with each of us sitting in the first four seats in each row. Approximately 8:05pm the man proclaimed he was the head security officer in HSBC arena attempted to approach my daughter (Amanda) and her boyfriend (Joel Lattuca) and I (Dan Buczek) politely asked the gentleman (which we later learned was security guard Ed Cotter) who he was, and he replied that he is the head of security and he wanted to speak with my daughter (Amanda) and the bald headed guy (who was Joel). At that time I asked the gentleman why he needed to talk to my daughter, he (Ed Cotter) said, “she has a coin she is trying to use with our vendors”. I said she didn’t do anything wrong, and there must be a misunderstanding. At this time my son Shane came over to where we were standing and asked what is the problem? The security guard (Ed Cotter)asked Shane ‘who are you’? Shane said that is my dad what is happening? The security asked for some identification, why I didn’t understand, so I asked for his identification. At this point the security guard immediately pulls out his shield, and says “I am a Buffalo Detective” and I am off duty and I am the head of security (in reality Mark Brenner is!) here and proceeded to be hostile. Ed cotter wanted to see identification I showed him my driver’s license and Shane showed him his Apostille badge. Once again his emotions were running very high this was evident to many people in the stands. He took our identifications and began to mock Shane’s Apostille Badge and said, “What do you think you are a Federal Agent” Shane said look at the Badge it clearly states what I am an “Ambassador”! Ed Cotter looked at the audience and realize he was disrupting the viewing of the game. Ed Cotter ordered us to come with him and I said I am watching the hockey game; all the people in that area, including my family, witnessed this. At that point the security officer (Ed Cotter) demanded that we go to a different area. I went with Ed Cotter to keep peace with Ed Cotter and instructed my son Shane to do the same.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 5

When we were in the concealed area (behind doors to a hallway for exiting near section 316) Ed Cotter began to badger my son and I. He said I have been looking for you all evening! My thought was why? He questioned the silver dollars we had and then looked at my son Shane and asked him if he was the same Shane Buczek that knew Billy Crawford (a Buffalo Police Officer), bringing up things that happened in the past. He exploded with comments that Shane caused a lot of problems at the BAC (Buffalo Athletic Club a facility that many Buffalo leaders belong to, such as Mayor Massiello). And said you Mr. Buczek caused a lot of problems with the Buffalo Police department. (Several years ago my son was railroaded and put in jail for ten months. I made every attempt to put a stay on the jail time sending letters and speaking to people in the gov’t. Ostensibly some changes were made in the Buffalo Police Department but obviously not enough, Ed Cotter was still abusing his powers). After that tirade he asked for back up and to call the Buffalo police Department to book us and put us in jail. He (Ed Cotter) continued to yell at us calling us many different names with various expletives. Ed Cotter (security officer) was out of control. On the evening of the arrest no warrant was issued! We were arrested without a court warrant! If the crime we were involved in "was taken place, is taking place or about to take place, or when the police officer investigating the case has personal knowledge about the crime they may arrest us." There was no police officer when we were placed under arrest, no life or property was being threatened and there was no probable cause! This was a false arrest! {That morning December 26th 2005 my son Shane had breakfast with Billy Crawford asking Billy when he planned to return him his money $13,000 which Shane had loaned him 5 years ago! In their conversation Shane told Bill Crawford that he was going to the HSBC Arena that evening. Personally I believe this bizarre occurrence was a set up, to put my son Shane back into jail ON another bogus charge!}See Jones v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 257, 273 (1959) no warrant for ARREST. Ed Cotter continuously badgered us that evening yelling “why are you trying to sell these coins, I told him they are not coins but Silver Dollars, and that we did not attempt to use them here at the HSBC arena. The only time I left the stands was to go to the men’s room taking approximately two minutes why? To watch the game. I had no intentions of using these liberty dollars at the HSBC and directed those in my party to do the same. Amanda, Adam & Caleb were very excited in using these silver liberties, they did not coerce anyone to taking these coins and none were used at the HSBC arena. My daughter, Amanda and two sons Adam & Caleb tried to use the Silver Dollars but they were not accepted! There were no injured parties! When I realized Shane & I were going to jail, I wanted to give my car keys to my sons Adam & Caleb. I was positioned next to the door to the corridor where my family was so I opened the door and gave the keys to my son Caleb Buczek, Ed Cotter started to scream he is trying to get away and I told him relax I just giving my keys to my son; at that moment he lunged to the door with my hand and foot in harms way and slammed the door causing injury to my hand and foot. Additional security was brought up with handcuffs; my son and I were hand- cuffed. Before leaving this area, Ed Cotter looked at all the security people in the room and said, “I will lie to the hilt and ALL these guys in here will back me up ALL the way.” I was confused by Ed Cotter’s statement. I came into the HSBC arena went to my seat sat there all the time and never moved except when I went to the men’s room, which only took 2 minutes. I never spoke to anyone

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 6

only my family? What was going on? At that point he took items out of my coat, wallet, my Silver Liberties, my comb and my cell phone and my Sabre ticket something I was going to keep as a souvenir. Ed Cotter went through my wallet and a very strange thing occurred when I got my items back from the holding center the next day I was missing $100. We were escorted by security down the corridor to the lower terrace at approximately 9:14pm. Ed Cotter (supposedly head of security) had me and kept swearing at me holding the cuffs yanking on them while he was swearing at me and threatening me that he will see to it that I am put in jail. He said all you South Buffalo guys think you are tough you fu~kin G~D dam Timon boys are not that tough now are you as he continued to badger me and then added injury to insult stating I (Ed Cotter) should tear your hair piece right off your head! When he got me in the lower terrace of the arena he continued to badger me with another security officer named I believe Tim McDonald, and others in the room, witnesses also were Rudy Torres security, three other people who control the monitors in the security room and the two police officers Jill Halor & George Wagner. They heard all that was said and Ed Cotter was very angry with me, during this whole time I did not give him justifiable cause to rough me up. He has very good friends who are friends of mine in the Buffalo Police Department, they told me he normally beats up his arrests, Ed Cotter likes to stack his charges. Ed Cotter has consistently proven he is a pathological liar and someone hopefully will address this problem. to be dismissed as a Police officer for his continuous inconsistencies as a Law Enforcement Officer. Ed Cotter conspired with others to maliciously defame my character by intimidating his staff to commit perjury. WHY? That answer should be obvious, Ed Cotter wanted Shane and I in jail for a circumstance that happened five years ago! The “Rule Of Law” did not apply in our case!

1.) We were harassed by an off duty police officer 2.) Kidnapped and interrogated without given our “Miranda Rights”! 3.) Abused and continuously wanted to provoke us to fight! 4.) We were handcuffed. 5.) Imprisoned unjustly for 16 hours and moved to nine cells. 6.) We were treated throughout the whole time as if we were hardened criminals. 7.) We did nothing wrong. 8.) We were harassed and mocked by many of the officers. 9.) Conspiracy abounds and racketeering at all levels! 10.) Our Mirada rights were not given to us for almost 2 hours after being handcuffed! 11.) We were presumed guilty before any facts were presented! 12.) Our bail was a ridiculous amount of $5,000, rather excessive!

Ed Cotter (security officer) continued to belittle my son and I. Ed Cotter wanted to accuse me of stealing the tickets I had, fortunately my cousin Fran Pordum bought the tickets through the Sabres organization (Gretchen). Ed Cotter tried to pin every imaginable circumstance on Shane & I. We then were escorted out of the arena at approximately 9:45pm. (Ed Cotter’s whole focus was to put us in jail for a circumstance that happened almost five years ago)! We sat in the police car for approximately 35 minutes. And then our Mirada rights were read to us by Jill Halor at approximately 10:15pm in front of the Buffalo Police office. Our Miranda Rights were given to us 2 hours after being kidnapped, personal items illegally taken and handcuffed! We arrived at the County Court Holding Center at about 10:23pm and we gave up our belt and shoes

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 7

and were put in the Intake Hold Room. When we were being processed Police Officer Wagner continuously told the Sheriffs that we were very cooperative and to leave them alone. I thought that was rather strange but I appreciate that comment very much. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following is the conversation by my wife Deborah Buczek approximately 10:00pm: I (Deborah Buczek) received a call from my daughter Amanda, that my husband and son Shane were arrested for having the “Liberty Dollar” on their person. At around 10:14 PM I called the precinct on Franklin and Pearl and ask if I could speak to the arresting officer so that I may fax over the information about the “Liberty Dollar”. I was hoping with this information that the police would let my family come home. I waited for some time before a man answered my call and I told him that I have document to show him that the silver dollar that my family had was a bonafide currency. He said to me in an extremely harsh voice that it was counterfeit and that there is no such thing as a “Liberty Dollar”! He also said that my son would not give him his social security number and that Shane was not an ambassador and that Shane was a fraud. I very calmly told the man on the phone that Shane is an ambassador and to please read his credentials and check out his badge. At this time his voice was extremely harsh and rude, I asked this man for his name and he said his name was “Mr. Buczek” and if I called back the precinct again he would arrest me. At this time I was extremely worried about my husband and son to be in the presence of such injustice and abuse. About a half hour later that night I called back the precinct and said I was Mrs. Buczek and that I would like to speak to the Captain in charge of the precinct. My call was forward to a voice mail a man named Battle and no one answered so then I just hung up the phone. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At approximately 11:02am the Secret Service (Mike Fields) had me come out of the Holding room to question me on the Silver Dollar. He asked me the following, age birth, home address, what I did for a living, immediate family members. Why I had the silver dollars on me (is it against the law to have silver dollars on your person I asked)? He also was pressing me if I had any other Secret Service matters in the past, I said no. Then he told me why Martha Stewart went to jail, because she lied to a Secret Agent and if I was lying that I would be going to Utah tomorrow!!!!! How about that for intimidation!!! His focus was on the legitimacy of the silver dollars I had. I called Mike Fields that week and he told me there was nothing wrong with the Silver Dollars Liberties. He looked up the website on the silver liberty dollars www.libertydollars.org and learned that they were very real and had doubled in value since 2003! The Secret Service (Fields) also questioned Shane for approximately 45 minutes. Mike Fields could readily see there were no merits in the arrest! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We were booked and then placed into a filthy Intake Room at the Erie County Holding Center and we stayed in that room until 5:pm sitting on the floor with on shoes on our feet, it was very cold and demeaning. We then were taken to a different room so we could sleep on a mattress, after almost 7 hours in the holding center we were allowed to sleep on the floor with a beat up mattress. We then were taken back two hours later to the same Intake Hold room at 7am, this was the forth move of the evening very tiring I have not slept a wink and I did not eat their food! At approximately 8:30pm we were transferred to the court across the street in a patty wagon. There we were given milk and a sandwich, which I did not eat. During the whole time I was in jail I did not eat. We were transferred to another holding room in all we were in nine different rooms, approximately 19 men in the room before we went to see the Judge.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 8

When Shane and I went to the Judge in handcuffs the Judge Fiorella told us of the charges we did not give a plea and the Judge established bail at $2500 each and told us he was entering a plea of “NOT GUILTY”! We could not speak and defend ourselves nor could we make a motion to be released on our own reconnaissance! A $2500 bail seemed excessive on a person who is not a criminal! What is going on with our process? Our hallmark theme in this Country “Innocent until proven guilty” was disregarded by Judge Fiorella! Judge Fiorella told us to get a lawyer and come back on December 30th, 2005! We then were escorted back into the cell, and then transferred in a patty wagon back to the holding center, for an additional 3 hours until my wife bailed us out! My wife who attended the hearing immediately went home a 35 minute drive one way (she had only 1 hour and 33 minutes as the window to pay this bail was closing at 12:30pm) to get the money and return to the bail house to have us release. My wife paid the money at 12:22pm (Window was closed at 12:30pm), it took until 2:35pm to release us. Several Sheriffs who I grew up were very alarmed that I was in the Holding Center. They knew this was a trumped up charge! I spent 16 hours in jail, no sleep because we had no bed and the inmates were restless all through the night with one black man threatening to beat up a white man. There were 20 men in the cell only 4 were white. Thankfully I was in the cell and not my other two sons Adam & Caleb! In this whole experience the most demeaning part of this incident was walking through HSBC Arena with people watching me (Dan Buczek) in handcuffs and some who knew me saying that is “MR. BUCZEK”, WOW this cant be real!!! Then I get calls from people who saw me at the HSBC Arena asking, “was that really you”? what happened. Presently I am sick over this whole incident and my intentions are to have it corrected. I now know first hand what many people are experiencing in Buffalo, unjust charges by corrupt cops. I have called several lawyers: Rodney Personius (855-1050) very good conversation wants $25,000 to handle the case! He was highly recommended by friends of mine in Washington DC. December 28th, 2005 received a strange phone call Wednesday morning: a Dan Drury called and asked for Mrs. Buczek, I told him I was her husband and I asked Dan can I help you? He said yes, I (Dan Drury) learned that you were in jail and wanted to make sure I was out. Erie County offers a program helping those who cannot get out bail. He then suggested a lawyer for my circumstance a John Liberti referred by Dan Drury (brother to Judge Drury who put Shane in jail in 2001 for 10 months). John Liberti was at the game and knew of the whole circumstance as Rudy (the real person in charge of Security at HSBS arena) told him what happened. Rudy told John Liberti we are going to have serious problems with this arrest. Rudy saw how I conducted myself and knew this was a trumped up charge. John Liberti stated that he was very surprised that I had called him. In our conversation John Liberti was very vulgar calling my family idiots for trying to use these Liberties dollars. And John Liberti stated that he is good friends with all the participants who charged Shane and I. John Liberti told me that they were his drinking buddies and they bring him business. He would never consider suing Ed Cotter or anyone else. He suggested I let Shane be on his own, he may go to jail and he would get me off maybe for $2,500. On an ACD charge which is Adjournment Contemplating Dismissal. I am not going to plea bargain on a bogus charge against my son and I! Much can be said about this guy Liberti do not trust him, whom I will update later…

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 9

Received a call from A T & T phone company on 12-29-2005 at 11:45am telling me to establish an account with the correctional facility and to call this # 1-888-241-1290 Called Charles Marchese 856-6446 (friend of John Liberti) wants $5000 for me only, will be able to get me off on ACD (Acquittal Contemplating Dismissal) send paper work to his fax # 845-6475. Called and attempted to communicate with Andrew LoTempio 842-2558 Called and attempted to communicate with Joe Agro 572-8412 Spoke to John Nucherno (Bill Horch friend) 875-2503 fax 873-1780 Additional contacts to be made Mike Gasper, John Whalen, William Horch, Tim Lopez, Tony Farocco, Pete Talty, Jay Rey, Civil Rights, TV, BEN…Dan Herbeck More information to follow… Three of my friends in the Buffalo Police Department (that I know of) who want to remain anonymous tried to reason with Ed Cotter on the evening of December 29th to no avail. Ed Cotter wants to be the new Commissioner of the Buffalo Police Department, which the new Major plans to appoint in the month of January 2006! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #2 - December 30th, 2005 Our hearing at the Buffalo City Court was a fiasco! We were in court at 9:30am and we are home now at 1:30pm. It was a very difficult experience but we are home. We were supposed to appear before Honorable Fiorella but we went before Hon. Kevin Keane. We brought our own CCR (Certified Court Reception ness) and were denied in using her (cost for her presence $200). The potential of the conversation in this case I am told can be edited by the Judge, therefore Having one’s own CCR could be very vital! On December 29th, 2005 we submitted a motion “Jurisdictional Challenge” moving to quash the complaint, dismiss the charges and exonerate the bond for reason of lack of subject matter jurisdiction! This was hand carried to Buffalo City Court (Joseph A. Fiorella), the City DA Michael Risman, and the Erie County DA Frank Clark. Basically Title 28 Part IV Chapter 89 Section 1446(a) clearly states: A defendant or defendants desiring to remove any civil action or criminal prosecution from a State court shall file in the district court of the United States for the district and decision within which such action is pending a notice of removal signed pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of civil Procedure and containing a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders serve upon such defendant or defendants in such action. This is some of what happened today Friday December 30th, 2005 at 12:18pm at our 2nd hearing without arraignment. We arrived at the Courtroom at 9:10am and waited over 3 hours for the Judge to call our case! First and foremost the Judge would not allow the CCR (certified court reporter). When she came up the Judge asked, ' who is this"? The Sheriff said the defendants private CCR, at which point the Judge

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 10

said, "She can’t be here of which I objected and read him the Law on the Office of Court Administration rule. When I read the CCR ruling the Judge said "what is a CCR a rock band'? I said, "Your Honor I take this case very seriously and it appears you don't see it that way. He then became very indignant and said "I take this case very serious too and you could get 2 to 4 years for your offense! The Judge was extremely offended by us bringing in a CCR but a few Sheriffs very quietly said this is cool!!! At this point the Judge took a 25-minute recess. An hour later the Judge called us up again and made it very clear that the CCR we brought was not allowed in his courtroom. The Judge wanted to proceed with the case but we objected and he did not want to allow us to have our way, but he acquiesced the Judge postponed the case until January 17th, 2006. Why? We presented papers to quash the complaint, dismiss the charges, and exonerate the bond for reason of lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Judge Keane was not happy with this request and denied our paper work. I attempted to explain the Anastasoff case to the Judge to no avail. The DA wanted us to see forensic specialist but we objected. The Judge (Kevin Keane) asked us what our objection was. I told the Judge we were standing on our paper work. Then the Judge defined Forensic for us in a mocking way. Several times he was very mocking and would interject by saying I take this Case to be very serious but he was laughing at us with everyone else in the courtroom. My wife, daughter and a friend witness this. It was very sad to watch us being judged as if the JUDGE-JURY- AND EXECUTIONER were present that day! And to think they do this every day. This must be corrected. Much can be said, but the real kicker to this whole fiasco was the Judge telling us, "Do you realize that you could go to jail for 2-4 years on these charges"! A rather intimidating statement for many to hear by the judge! Bottom line The Honorable Kevin Keane did not accept our paper work and was very unaware of the Anastasoff v. United States of America. This oversight by the Judge could cost him his Job! http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/commentprint101000a.html The last request made by Judge Keane was “will we obtain a lawyer”. Shane & I answered with we will seek counsel. The Judge stated, “This does not sound very encouraging”! We go back to court January 17th, 2006. The minutes of this appearance will be given to us next week so we are told by Judge Keane. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On or about January 13th, 2006 received a call from a Buffalo Police officer telling me that with two other police officers they tried to persuade Ed Cotter to drop the charges. Ed cotter refused! Furthermore Ed Cotter stated that if Dan Buczek continues to talk to others about this case he (Ed Cotter) was going to try to find a way to put my children in jail, little does Ed Cotter know that was not the right thing to suggest to Dan Buczek! On January 12th 2006 we submitted three additional motions

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 11

1) Defendants Notice of Filing Notice of Removal – given to City Court 2) Defendants’ Notice of Removal – given to US District Court for Western District of NYS 3) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss - given to US District Court for Western District of NYS

On the morning of January 17th, 2006 we submitted a motion to City Court, County DA & City DA that motion was “Notice to the Court”, explaining that the City Court lacks Jurisdiction! # 3 - On January 17th, 2006 we appeared before Judge Fiorella. The ADA that day was John Gilmour. We appeared before Judge Fiorella who was not happy that we did not bring a lawyer. I explained that we were PRO SE LITIGATORS and the Judge did not like that idea. What has happened to our CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS – As I recall reading in “OUR CONSTITUTION” Sixth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution states: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense. The Assistant DA John Gilmour motioned for a forensic testing (in the previous hearing the ADA Gene Adams made the same request which was denied) questioning our mental competence considering that we did not bring an attorney with us there must be something wrong with us! The judge would not allow this. The judge admonished the ADA to answer our paper work, which as of this day the 23rd has not been done! Thus far we have submitted 10 motions none have been answered. If you want to see a copy of them you may request them for me. We go back to court on the 26th of January. As of January 26th we have not gotten the minutes requested for the December 30th hearing with Judge Kevin Keane! On January 18, 2006 we submitted additional motions to the US District Court for the Western District of NY. (1) Defendants’ Emergency Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (2) Order Our health is not very good as of January 23rd, 2006, the 28th day in a row that I have not slept well and my heath is not good. Why? I have NEVER been in a situation that has been so insulting, demeaning and humiliating, Shane and I had severe colds from the very poor conditions at the holding center. It was filthy, with food on the floors and dirt and we had to walk from each room nine in all most of the time with our shoes off. Shane and I did not eat while we were there because we could not trust the conditions of the food. It was a very very sad day in the Buczek household. What is happening to America? Our freedoms are evaporating right before our eyes. Can you imagine that you can’t take your family out, to enjoy an evening at a Sabres game without being harassed and humiliated by the very people who are supposed to protect you from evil. The

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 12

question remains in my mind “who are the real terrorists” in this Great Country (The United Sates of America) are they the cops? On this day January 23rd, 2006 we submitted three more motions:

1) Dismiss the charges – City Court & DA, County DA 2) Judicial Notice Self Representation – City Court & DA, County DA

(3) Adjudicative Facts – City Court & DA, County DA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # 4 - On January 26th, 2006 we went to Court again for the 4th time and the conclusion was no arraignment has been established. I have learned much from this experience with many throughout the Country calling me and emailing much information to help me with this injustice. THE SADDEST FACT IS THAT EVERY YEAR 100 MILLION JUDGEMENTS ARE MADE IN THIS COUNTRY USA AND 98 MILLION ARE ILLEGAL! When do the American people stand up for their rights, which are violated daily? We arrived at Court at approximately 9:18am. Dan Herbeck came and talked to me. He told me that the article he wrote and was in the Buffalo News January 22nd, 2006 was the most viewed ever, and that I broke a record on the Internet! Also he is receiving emails from people all over the country! Jim Ostrowski came and asked me if I would like to retain him. Jim was very gracious. We went before the Judge Fiorella and two new ADA’s were handling the case Molly Jo Musarra and a little petite lady brunet; I guess they are the best Erie County can offer the People. When we were called up to the Judge the two ADAs’ came up also. Molly Jo Musarra spoke and asked for a half hour recess to discuss the case with Ed Cotter. They deliberated for 45 minutes and the third ADA John Gilmore went out to the hall and asked them to return as the judge wanted to proceed with the hearing. Molly Jo Musarra rattled off her motions to dismiss the first charge of Fraudulent Instrument and the other charges were reduced to misdemeanor! We objected and Judge Fiorella frowned, again ordering us to retain an attorney! It was rather scary considering what we have experienced in this courtroom with Fiorella & Keane. The improper demeanor, favoritism, bias, conflicts of interest, corruption, the outrageous bail money ($5,000), politics and racketeering has been very evident to all who witnessed these hearings! Once again we left the courtroom without an official arraignment, and were ordered to come back with an attorney on January 31st, 2006! After the hearing on January 26th my son Shane told me that ADA Molly Jo Musarra was the assistant District Attorney that took charge in placing him in jail for ten months four years ago! Mrs. Musarra knows the Buczek family has a bias against the Buczek family and needs to be rescued! She is good friends with Ed Cotter and Billy Crawford both of whom I believe have orchestrated this false arrest on December 26th, 2005! __________________________________________________________________________________ On January 30th at approximately 7:32pm I received a call from Channel 2 WGRZ (Erika Brayson) asking if they could come to my house in a half hour to interview me on the case. I suggested they come tomorrow at the courthouse. Channel 2 (Linda Steel & the camera man) and Channel 4 ( Ron Gablonski) were there, also Matt Gryta from the Buffalo news! __________________________________________________________________________________ # 5 - January 31, 2006 the 5th time we have gone to court since December 27th, 2005 with no

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 13

arraignment! - We went to court today for the first time with a lawyer James Ostrowski who wrote a book “Political Class Dismissed”. He seems to be right man for the job only time will tell. In the courtroom Molly Jo Musarra ask for one more week to review the “People’s” case against us. Jim asked for our bail money and molly Objected on what grounds she was not very clear. Personally I don’t think she knows what to do, especially with all our PRO SE Litigation approach for the first month of this matter. Thus far the DA’s office has yet to answer any of our paper work! We go back February 15th, 2006 to learn what the charges are against us; this will be the 7th time we have gone back to court to be arraigned! Do you think the DA in Erie County has his act together, I don’t think so! Still no minutes from the December 30th hearing with Judge Kevin Keane and by the way we were denied using our own CCR (certified court reporter in the December 30th hearing)! This request was again made on record and Judge Joseph Fiorella stated he would have the minutes sent to us! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # 6 - February 15th, 2006. We went to court again for the 6th time. Molly Jo Musarra seemed very preoccupied with the case; it is becoming clearer to me that the paper work has them confused! A motion was made by the Plaintiffs: #1 the fraudulent instrument charge was dropped. I guess they couldn't get much teeth into that one! The other two have been reduced and I am not clear to what. Jim Ostrowski (presently our lawyer) is rather vague explaining what he is going to do and how to proceed. I think he is preoccupied with "Free Buffalo" organization. The plan is to submit the Notice of Motion and the Memorandum of Law next week. Our next hearing is March 7th 9:30am. An interesting visitor came to the hearings, a retired Buffalo Detective Larry Goins. He wants to help me help him with a class action suit against Ed Cotter and Tim McDonald. He shared some very interesting yet sad stories of how these two guys have been harassing people in the city over the years with many noticing their misdoings! More on that later. I must say it is much more fun being a PRO SE litigator. Should I tell Jim his services are no longer required? As we departed from the bench I asked Judge Joseph Fiorella when do I get the minutes of the December 30th hearing with Judge Kevin Keane? This is the fifth time I am making this request with no minutes provided! Are we going to follow proper proceedings and have “The Rule of Law” adhere too? On February 24th, Frank Navarro (Judge Givens CCR) called and told me he would have the transcript from December 30th, 2005 with Judge Kevin Keane presiding, ready on Monday! The cost would be $32.50. Judge Kevin Keane on December 30th specifically told me the minutes would be ready the following week of the hearing. After numerous requests to obtain the transcript of the hearing and 60 days I may have them on Tuesday, February 28th, 2006. Please tell me this is the “Rule of Law” on how this should be handled! There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when it's convenient. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses; only results." Kenneth Blanchard # 7 - March 7th, 2006. Molly Jo Musarra came to court late 10:30am; the Judge was not pleased; it appeared he had no say in the matter. Molly Jo had our motion since Friday March 3rd and seemingly did not have enough time to read the motion, she asked for 3 days the Judge granted the time. We (Jim O) ask the court if the court will be prepared to make a decision on that day March 10th of which

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 14

judge Fiorella said no. We then asked, when could we come back, with him making a decision on this motion and it was finally concluded that April 4th, 2006 at 9:30am would be a good day for the next hearing! When we left the courtroom Ed Cotter was rushing out, as he left and went down the escalator he looked at Frank (Holder) Garnetti and called him a fxxking asshole several times. Frank then went to the Internal Affairs to tell them of Ed Cotter’s unbecoming behavior in a public forum. The department initially rejected Frank but when he told them he was going to the district Attorney’s office they accepted his statement regarding the incident with Ed Cotter! Wow, want a fiasco this is turning out to be! CRIMINAL MALFEASANCE Cost to Shane and I during this time… plus cost to my family, Debbie missing work, Amanda etc… TL called 3-24-2006 asking how the case was progressing. He was not pleased and was very concern. Hopefully he stated you will be ACD (acquittal contemplating dismissal)… Have been instructed to cease and desist # 8 - April 4th, 2006. The Cotter group (Ed for the first time was not there) headed by Fiorella & Musarra once again put up their smoke screen by answering the affidavit we submitted March 7th. It was a very sad response in which they continued to defend the lies of Ed Cotter. It appears this matter is headed for a jury trial. When we were at the bench with Jim Ostrowski speaking the sheriff (bailiff) whose name is Katie Sweeney, approached Shane and I from behind and took Shane’s hand out of his pocket, yes she actually touched him. I told the Judge that is a form of harassment and he shrugged and said you really think so?! This whole ordeal is getting really ludicrous. Much can be said, we left knowing we were returning April 13th, at 4:15pm. This will be a Suppression Hearing - Huntley --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # 9 - April 13th, 2006 The Ed Cotter group Jill Halor, George Wagner, Molly Musarra and Judge Fiorella with bailiff Katie Sweeney and several other ADA’s lady named ________________ and another lady_____________ Suppress Hearing Molly-not voluntary 3 charges- Shane- Forged instrument, impersonation 2nd, harassment 2 charges- Dan Judge Dismissed forged instrument charges and Denied motion to dismiss remaining 2 charges??? Judge asked the Potential witnesses must be excluded from listening to what is being said and them to leave the court room. Opening Statements: by Ed Cotter Secretary of State CD # 455 Ed Cotter- off duty private- showed his badge

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 15

“No jurisdiction to make arrest” Detective Ed M. Cotter 695 Main St Shamrock Security Owner December 26th 2005 Dan and Shane Buczek Ed Cotter identified End of 2nd period Asked the person who they are • Does HSBC have monitors? • Who was the person that told you where the Buczeks were? Citizen • Pointed to Shane • Said I slapped his hand • Shane said he was a “federal agent’ Exhibit one- flashed the badge Again Shane said “I am a Federal Agent” We agreed to go with him WE did not produce the coins Cotter searched me and took my wallet and coins Conversation with Dan regarding Hand cuffed in the room on the 3rd floor. Many people saw this. Did you expose you gun at anytime? Detective Cotter nice to see you Did you? Jill Halor and George Wagner did not testify 3 parts interaction

1. In the aisle while watching the game 2. Brought to another location. Is it a room emergency exit area you closed off stairway to other

areas Management Service- Ed Thomas

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 16

Cotter sole owner of Shamrock Inc. Delavan North hired Shamrock Inc. Not an employee of HSBC Who brought to your attention? Carol did (Delavan North) People trying to pass 20 (liberty) coins Spoke to by vendors. Who are the vendors? Vendors told them they could not accept it. $20 coins are good No one took them Are you familiar with counterfeiting? Never with coins. No experience Roughly how many incidents of counterfeiting call the Secret Service? Head of Security HSBC Mark Brenner *No reasonable cause or probable cause. No Suspicion why Cotter approached the Buczeks’ Why did you question the legality of the coins? Call the SS was made after they were detained ***decision to make the arrest was made after they pushed me. Who made the decision to make the arrest? I did- Ed Cotter When they are detained is that an arrest? When were they detained? Perjury- I asked them to follow me out to the hall. What words did you use? I needed to talk to them and identified myself as a police officer. Perjury-Ed Cotter said he was Head of Security Me- he was swearing When did you see these coins? Daniel- Mr Buczek showed them to me. Did you search them?

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 17

No Perjury- You made the arrest based on harassment? The door opened up and they tried to escape. Perjury-I was between the door and the Buczeks. Why? Because I did not want them to leave. Did you ever inform them of your arrest? Who caused the door to open up? Shane was close to the door. Molly objected Probable Cause is established. Post Arrest statements Fiorella told Jim Ostrowski that he was off topic. Shane moved toward the door first then Daniel went they tried to escape. Where you shouting at them? Did you threaten them? Ed Cotter Perjury- denied saying “you fucking Timon boy” Ed Cotter answered with a big smile on his face. Confiscated coins in hallway Buczek voluntarily gave me coins and badge Your testimony And police handcuffed me in the hallway- witnessed around Put in BN who are at the game and saw Dan and Shane handcuffed HSBC have security videos. I don’t know how long they keep the security videos. Mark Brenner is head of security he called secret service. *Perjury- person pointed to Shane Do you know the person who pointed out Shane? BN- a spectator You previously testified that a male knows of 2 people in a coin incident. Ed as I was talking to the vendor and unnamed male came to me and told me he knew where the

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 18

fellows were. Perjury- Shane distributed the coins. WE NEED THE MINUTES OF TRANSCIPT! Standard form of arrest Daniel Buczek, defendant No injury Jim O - Where did Jill and George go? Molly - I told them to go home! Molly- the peoples position that they were not needed. JIM O - This is a hearing to suppress evidence. Molly- I don’t see any relevance in having the officers stay

Amanda Burke - Sworn in by Jim Ostrowski lawyer for the defendants. Were you at HSBC with the Buczeks’ on December 26th? Amanda - Yes Why were you at the Game? Mr. Buczek bought us tickets for our Christmas present. We went the day following Christmas. Who was with you? 1st row- Caleb Buczek, Ashley Heinrich, Amanda Burke, Adam Buczek 2nd row- Dan Buczek, Joel Latucca, Amanda Buczek, Shane Buczek Did anything unusual happen at the hockey game? Not at first, but in the second quarter a man dressed in a green blazer and slacks confronted our party where we were sitting. Do you identify this man to be Ed Cotter? Yes I do, he is Ed Cotter. What happened when Ed Cotter came to your section. The man rested his hand on the railing and leaned over Mr Buczek, pointed and said “I want to talk to the ‘bald guy’ right there’” and Mr. Buczek said “why do you need to talk to him?” Ed Cotter repeated himself again “I want to talk to that bald guy right there and the lady next to him”. Joel looked over at him and turned his head because he didn’t know who or what the man wanted. Judge- you are characterizing what other people say.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 19

How did Ed Cotter identify himself? He pulled out a police badge. And what were his exact words? Well, I’m not sure what his exact words were but… Molly- objection, the witness isn’t “exactly sure” therefore she is not an eye witness for this question. Judge- sustained. Ostrowski kept trying to rephrase the question, Molly kept objecting it saying he was “leading the witness”. Was anyone with Ed Cotter? No Did you personally see Ed Cotter threaten Dan and Shane Buczek at this time? No That’s all. We should ask if Molly-have you ever been arrested? Judge Fiorella granted a continuation of the “Suppression Hearing” next week April 25th Part 2, 2nd floor So Jim O could question the two police officers who left prematurely. (Cotter can’t produce his badge and be a PRIVATE SECURITY GUARD!) **Molly tries to object to break you train of thought** with objections that have no substance or bearing on the case! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #9 – April 17th, 2006 Judge JOSEPH A. FIORELLA once again is using her authority wrongfully with the aide of ADA Molly Jo Musarra! See City Court Reporter CLAUDIA M. BOROWICZ

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #10 – April 25th, 2006 Both Molly and Jim explain to the court their position on the case. Jim cross examines both officers Jill Halor and George Wagner. Both Officers did much in disclaiming what happened often saying I don’t know or I don’t recall or I was not there…. Very sad on their part! Well the above article reeks with fabrications! And my goal is to expose those who lie, cheat, intimidate, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #11 – May 23rd, 2006 We were first on the list 2pm part six; Molly is a no show? She finaly shows up an hour late and tells the court she had the wrong date – May 25th. Court admonishes Dan Buczek for gestures a bogus comment by Fiorella. Judge continues to show favoritism to the Plaintiffs and the ADA Molly Muscara. Molly wants to come back on the 25th we requested the 30th, Court accepts.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 20

#12 – May 30th, 2006 . Molly produces transcript of calls made to her suggesting that the calls were made by Dan Buczek a phone which is in his name, a ridiculous accusation by Molly, just another smoke screen to muddy up the case against Shane and I. Jim O continues his venue that the Court should drop these charges based on the credible account given by one witness of this false arrest, Amanda Burke presented an excellent description of what Ed Cotter did. Jim explains to the Court approx 15 min that there is no basis for any charges because Cotter is not credible and his testimony reeks of perjury! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #13 – June 27th, 2006 9:30am part 6 Judge Fiorella – defendant’s motion denied! Charges that the People ( what a misnomer) are making against us: 1.) criminal impersonation, 2nd degree, a class A misdemeanor (PL &190.25-3) 2.) harassment 2nd degree (PL &240.26-1) #14 – July we were told that a trial will begin in October. #15 – October storm postpone trial until December 11th (Jim Ostrowski’s birthday could be a good omen!) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #16 – December 6th Pre Trial Hearing: Jim O, Molly Musarra ADA & Judge Fiorella. We were supposed to be in attendance. Received a call from Jim at approx 1:45pm December 7th. Jim briefly explained his experience in this session with Molly and Fiorella, it was not good! Jim is contemplating recusing Judge Fiorella, why simply Jim took his father to a Polish Judges party on December 5th, 2006 and over heard Judge Joe Fiorella and ADA Molly Musarra discussing our case. That is a no no and “Ex Parte Communication” is a valid reason to recuse those involved in such conversation. Both Molly and Fiorella should have been removed from the case. Jim filed papers to have this done on Friday December 8th and both the judge and the assistant district attorney denied receiving the papers! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #17 – December 11th, 2006, The case started off with Judge Sharon LaVollo showing up at the bench. Judge Joseph Fiorella strangely recused himself! Jim Ostrowski asked Judge LaVollo to postpone this case until she had time to review the matter. Judge LaVollo would have none of that and proceeded with jury selection and what a sham it was! The entire proceeding gave every evidence that there was jury tampering! Twenty-five jurors were brought in; the judge dismissed 4 and through a convoluted process of elimination of cause & consent / preemptory challenges we had six jurors selected to decide our fate! One of the jurors Sara Rubizs unequivocally was connected somehow to ADA Molly Musarra! This is under investigation presently. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #18 – December 12th, 2006, Cross examinations began 10:20am; Judge Sharon M. LoVallo stated three basic rules must be adhere to, 1.) The defendants are innocent until proven guilty, 2.) Burden of proof is on the People. 3.) The People must bring evidence that is beyond a reasonable doubt. Detective Ed Cotter begins his testimony at 10:50am and he is the only witness to the alleged crime! His entire testimony was faulty to say the least. The transcript will prove this beyond a shadow of a doubt! During the court process several times the judge asked the jury to be removed and the Judge

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 21

would chastise our lawyer Jim Ostrowski. At approximately 11:15am the judge asked for the jury to go back to their chambers and Sharon LoVallo commenced to make demeaning remarks toward Jim Ostrowski. During this time Ed Cotter summoned the bailiff and told him that I was staring at him (Ed Cotter) and I was not. The sheriff came to me and tells me not to stare at Cotter. I told him that Cotter was starring at me. The sheriff then proceeded to tell me to stop or he will have to remove me from the court. Then the judge got involved and questioned me why I was staring at the witness. What a satirical joke that was! We took a lunch break and Cotter continued to answer questions by both defense and plaintiff lawyers. At approximately 2:29pm he was dismissed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #19 – December 13th, 2006, Cross examinations continued; Jill Halor the arresting officer testifies 10:25am for the People (3 minutes & summation 3 minutes). The defense cross-examines for 25 minutes +, in all Jill is on the stand for approximately 31 minutes. Jill is under much stress as a fellow officer was shot the week before and she was at that hearing the day before. This case to Jill was insignificant! Amanda Burke is now on the stand (the defense) for approximately 31 minutes. Ashley Heinrich on the stand (defense) for approximately 20 minutes. Caleb Buczek (defense) on the stand for approximately 10 minutes! We had potentially 44 witnesses we could have called to the stand and Jim used only four people including me Dan Buczek! The question remains why? Jim was frustrated by the Judge and intents to file a complaint against her when he sees the transcript! I went on the stand at 2:10pm and finish at 3:35pm; much can be said, we will wait for the transcript, which incidentally will cost me $1650. What a joke! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #20 – December 14th, 2006, Cross-examinations continued – jury finds us guilty of all counts! Shane is put in jail! Why because he gave a PO Box as his address! Dan Dillion deputy county clerk is called to the stand to clarify the Apostille Badge that allegedly Shane used for identification, claiming we were Federal agents. Also Deputy Jeremy Chase (booking department) was called to testify in which he stated under oath that he did the booking on Dan Buczek. He did not physically do the booking and he made that clear in his testimony! In summation Jim Ostrowski did an admirable job but failed to have us acquitted! He lacked in preparation for the battle and lost. He was ineffective do to Judge Sharon LoVallo continuous belittling statements toward Jim Ostrowski and her continued overruling any objection and/or legalNow we have to proceed without him to vindicate ourseleves! The Judge showed considerable favortism to the ADA Molly Musarra. In approximately 50 rulings made by Judge Sharon LoVallo in sustaining, overruling, objections, etc 48 (96%) were in favor of the ADA Molly Jo Musarra! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #21 – December 15th, 2006, I post bail for Shane via a Bail Bondsman for $1,160. The judge states that the PSI will take place and we are ordered to come back March 20th, 2007. Ostrowski was so frustrated by the judge that he did not call in additional witnesses! Presently we are working on what to do next! I have just learned that my Son Adam has changed his wedding plans from July 7, 2007 to March 10th, 2007… WHY? Because he is concerned that his brother Shane and Dad will be going to jail on March 20th, how sad! At the wedding we had a very sad experience were Shane was again victimtized by circumstances beyond his control!

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 22

New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct Attn: Linda Pascarella 585-232-5756 fax 232-7834 EMERGENCY HEARING

"Falsely Reporting An Incident" by Buffalo City Court Judge Sharon LoVallo! Hello, I want to share an incident that happened Friday March 2nd, 2007 I am very saddened to share this matter with you the following happened Friday: On Friday March 2nd, 2007 I went to file some motions concerning our case. If you need to understand more go to Google and type my name Dan Buczek in the search engine. Anyways the following occurred: 1.) I asked for a "Request for Judicial Intervention" I filed a Notice of Petition requesting the Chief Clerk Sharon Thomas to give me a certified copy of the docket in my case. Up to this point she has refused to give me the documents. Filing of the petition at 1:11pm on March 2nd, 2007 at the Erie County Clerk's office at 25 Delaware Ave Buffalo, NY. 2.) I filed a "Void Judgment" for Shane Buczek (my son). I gave one copy to the District Attorney's office and one copy to the Judge Sharon LoVallo. This was approximately 1:31pm. 3.) I gave a copy of the Notice of Petition requesting the Chief Clerk to give me a certified copy of the docket in my case. This was at 1:35pm. 4) I then went to give a copy of the petition to the Buffalo City Corporate Counsel Alisa Lukasiewicz at 1:59pm. 5.) I then went to 107 Delaware giving a copy of the "Petition" to the New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. 6.) I went back to the Chief Clerk's Office approximately 2:23pm and requested the CCR Jill Spencer to give me the transcript she had promised to me for several months. The lady I believe Marsha was attempting to contact Jill Spencer. Jill continuously dodges me giving weak excuses why she not giving me the transcript. When I made this request at the Chief's Clerk's Office within several minutes four Deputies surrounded me telling me that I have made a bomb threat! They then escorted me to the metal detector had me and two of my friends go through the detector. One deputy took my digital recorder of which he gave it back to me when I left the building. I then learned that Jill Spencer would not produce the transcript until 5pm. For the fifth time I asked that she leave it at the Chief Clerk's Office and I would pick it up Monday morning. I then left the building. When I was leaving a sheriff came to me quietly and told me Judge LoVallo told his dept that I (maybe my son) had sent her a letter stating a Oklahoma City Incident could happen here at the City Court House. This is coming from a judge; now I call that "falsely reporting an incident", should I give this to the FBI?

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 23

7.) I filed the Affidavit of Service in the Erie County Clerk's Office at 2:41pm. 8.) That evening I had a Detective from the Sheriff's dept Michael J. Dalfonso and a Town of Evans police officer visit me at 5:35 pm March 2nd 2007 at my home. They were very serious and said Shane sent a bomb threat to Judge LoVallo! Ludicrous! I was very cordial to them and simply told them there is no truth in this allegation! I asked did they see this bomb threat letter they said no. Were is the accusatory instrument? This was clearly "Falsely Reporting An Incident" by the Judge Sharon LoVallo and the Erie County District Attorney's Office. I also asked them when did this threat take place, they answered they did not know. Why did they wait until I came to the Chief Clerk's Office to question me on this bomb threat? Much more can be said concerning judge LoVallo’s demeanor in this case! March 13th is our next hearing. Hope to hear from you... Dan Buczek 716-947-5384 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #22 – March 12th, 2007, Jailed! Ordered by judge Sharon LoVallo to come to court a week early to discuss the probation meeting and the fact that James Ostrowski was releasing himself from the case! To our surprise Dan & Shane were placed in jail. Officer 7550 pushes Shane while he is in hand cuffs. Why? Because we failed to go to a meeting with the probation department. No official request of this appointment was given by the judge. According to CPL (Criminal Procedure Law) 390.20 requirements for misdemeanors not necessary. We immediately filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus – Request for judicial intervention with the Supreme court of Erie County. POLICE & COURTS Published on March 14, 2007 © The Buffalo News Inc. Father and son jailed for violating orders Daniel Buczek, a 56-year-old Derby businessman, and his son were both jailed Tuesday for violating court orders to cooperate with Erie County Probation Department officials conducting presentencing investigations on them. Buczek and his son, Shane Buczek, 37, were both convicted of criminal impersonation and harassment Dec. 14 for a scuffle with an HSBC Arena security officer after they tried to use privately minted currency to buy beer at a concession stand. They also claimed Shane Buczek was a federal agent. City Judge Sharon M. LoVallo also ordered both Buczeks to halt their post-conviction efforts to send printed material to both the jurors and Deputy District Attorney Molly Jo Musarra, the trial prosecutor. LoVallo also cited Shane Buczek for violating other court orders by traveling several times to Florida after that jury verdict. Shane Buczek insisted he had only gone back to his home in the Fort Lauderdale area after the jury trial to place some material in storage. The Buczeks were taken from court in handcuffs in lieu of $100,000 cash or property bail each. #23 – March 15th, 2007 Writ Of Habeas Corpus stuns the courts which was filed on March 12th. Dan Buczek goes before Erie County Judge Sheila A. DiTullio tells Dan Buczek he can’t represent himself and appoints attorney Michael O’Rouke to his case. I paid him $2,500 to handle the case. Shane went before Judge Penny Woflgang and his Writ of Habeas Corpus was denied! On this day we learned that a Chris Phol filed a charge against Shane, alleging that Shane injured him. This ocurred at his brother’s Adam Buczek wedding. A totally bogus charge trumped up by the DA’s

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 24

office and that sly ada Molly Jo Musarra. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #24 – March 22nd, 2007 Dan goes before Erie County Judge Sheila A. DiTullio once again with Michael O’Rouke. Judge orders release of Dan Buczek providing he drops the Writ! The ECHC drags its feet in releasing Dan Buczek that day and the grace of God and some excellent negotiations by his daughter Amanda Buczek, Dan was freed that day at approximately 6pm! Dan Buczek was in jail illegally for 11 days. This is 12 days in all! Father in arena scuffle released; son still jailed Buffalo News – Matt Gryta – 03/22/2007 Derby businessman Daniel Buczek was released from jail Thursday after a judge lowered his bail. However, his son and co-defendant, Shane, remained jailed after both were convicted last year year in an HSBC Arena scuffle after trying to use privately minted currency at a concession stand. Erie County Judge Sheila A. DiTullio reduced to $2,500 the $100,000 bail Buffalo City Judge Sharon M. LoVallo had set on the elder Buczek, 56, on March 13. DiTullio had both men jailed for violating court orders to cooperate with probation officials conducting presentencing investigations. A jury found both Buczeks guilty of criminal impersonation and harassment for fighting with an arena security officer and falsely claiming Shane Buczek was a badge-carrying “federal agent” during the incident at a Buffalo Sabres hockey game Dec. 26, 2005. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #24 – March 29th, 2007 BUFFALO NEWS – POLICE & COURTS Son in arena scuffle ordered to remain jailed Updated: Friday 03/30/07 6:50 AM Shane Buczek, convicted with his father last year for an HSBC Arena scuffle after trying to use privately minted currency at a concession stand, was ordered Thursday to remain jailed after a prosecutor said he has been charged with assaulting a man during a recent dance floor altercation. Erie County Judge Shirley Troutman ordered him held in lieu of $100,000 bail. But she said bail will automatically revert to the $15,000 bail bond his parents posted for him after his brief mid-December jailing as soon as he submits to a Probation Department presentencing interview. After the court session, Buczek’s parents — including his father, Daniel, 56, who was released last week on $2,500 bail — said they are not getting cooperation from probation officials. Both Derby men had been jailed, pending their April 17 sentencing, because of allegations they had refused to cooperate with probation officials preparing presentencing reports. Deputy District Attorney Molly Jo Musarra unsuccessfully urged Troutman not to alter the bail of Shane Buczek, 37, because of the pending Hamburg assault case. She also cited alleged “threatening and harassing” communications he has made by mail to jurors and the judge who handled his trial. In December, a City Court jury found both Buczeks guilty of criminal impersonation and harassment for fighting with an HSBC Arena security officer and falsely claiming Shane Buczek was a badge-carrying “federal agent” during a hockey game Dec. 26, 2005. This was a major lie perperprated by DA’s office and Chris Phol #24 – March 30th, 2007 Shane has to appear in Hamburg Town court before judge Rooth. He did not have represention. Judge Rooth told Shane to come back with counsel and gave him until May 15th #25 – April 17th, 2007 Went to court today and learned that ADA Molly Musarra was not prepared for this court appearance. I received a letter the day before sent by attorney Mike O’Rourke telling me that we have to appear on April 24th. Fortunately I appeared in court on the 17th judge Sharon LoVallo did not see the letter attorney Michael O’Rourke sent. What a fiasco! The continuing saga of RICO in the courts in Erie County! Shane was in jail for 37 days Bail cut to $40,000 in HSBC Arena fracas Updated: 04/18/07 7:05 AM The bail of jailed Shane Buczek was reduced Tuesday by the judge who will sentence him and his

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 25

father, Daniel, 56, next month. City Judge Sharon M. LoVallo warned Shane Buczek, 37, that should he be able to post the reduced bail of $40,000 prior to the May 29 sentencings, he will face a rejailing should he once again leave Erie County before the criminal case is resolved. He was accused of making several trips to Florida after his conviction by a jury of criminal impersonation and harassment for a Dec. 26 fight with HSBC Arena security officer Edward M. Cotter after allegedly trying to use privately minted currency to make a purchase. Shane Buczek also reportedly identified himself as a law enforcement officer. After the judge adjourned the sentencings because the Buczeks have yet to supply the Erie County Probation Department with all the documents needed for their case, Daniel and Deborah Buczek, who run a Derby business, and their son’s lawyer, Mark A. Worrell, all declined comment on the possibility of posting the reduced bail. Shane Buczek has been jailed since March 13 in lieu of $100,000 bail set by LoVallo. #26 – May 16th, 2007 Went to court today for the 26th time on this matter. Appeared before judge Sharon LoVallo with attorney Michael O’Rourke. This was a 2pm hearing and we were called to the bench at 3:45pm, by 4:10pm the decision was made by judge Sharon LoVallo. Mike spoke for 15 minutes giving a brief history of my life (biography) that I wrote for him. I could have done a better job. The judge gave her summation of the case by stating the following (paraphrased):

1.) This case has gone on now much to long as the incident happened December 26th, 2005 and it should have been over January 7th, 2006. (17+months)!

2.) You Mr. Buczek for the most apart have been very uncooperative . Mr. O’Rourke you stated that Mr., Buczek is an outstanding individual cooperatation is a key to his success and various other complimentary words but the court sees him as UNCOOPERATIVE. He has no respect for the court at all nor for the probation office.

3.) I can’t put you in jail nor will I allow you the experience of having a probation officer, you would be much trouble to them for the next three years!

4.) But I can have you do community service and I am telling you to do 150 hours. (Later I learned that it was with the Salvation Army located on West Ferry & Grant.

5.) She concluded by stating emphatically do not do any thing without counsel, do not make contact with ada Molly Musarra and do not make contact with any of the jury!

*** Molly Jo Musarra uncharacteristically did not say one derogatory word against me nor the case! On this day I made three requests of Mr. O’Rouke to get my coins back from the DA’s office, get my bail money and to file the appeal. Only the appeal was done which was filed on June 5th, 2007 after several requests to Mike O’Rourke. I took the inititive to get my bail money of the $2500 given on December 27th, 2005 I was given back $2425 ($75 surcharge for processing the bail, what happened to the interest on the money)? Also I had to pay $140 + $20 court fees that day. Now who are the real criminals?? I began my community service that Friday May 18th. And this area is Ed Cotter’s (arresting officer) district! Man spared jail for HSBC fight By Matt Gryta NEWS STAFF REPORTER Updated: 05/17/07 6:28 AM After Derby businessman Daniel Buczek promised he would stay out of trouble, City Judge Sharon M. LoVallo on Wednesday spared him jail on his conviction for fighting with an HSBC Arena security officer on Dec. 26, 2005. LoVallo also said she fears Buczek, 57, the owner of a property management company and longtime youth sports coach, will encounter further “problems” with the law. The judge will sentence Buczek’s son, Shane, 37, on May 29. LoVallo also scolded the father for “this entire ordeal” he caused by failing to cooperate with court officials following his mid-December jury conviction. After a four-day trial both father and son were found guilty of criminal

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 26

impersonation and harassment for fighting with HSBC Arena security officer Edward M. Cotter and falsely claiming Shane was a badge carrying “federal agent.” The judge granted Daniel a conditional discharge, saying she did not feel inclined to send him to jail on a first offense. But she ordered him to perform 150 hours of community service by Sept. 1. LoVallo also barred him from further attempts to contact members of the jury in the case and Deputy District Attorney Molly Jo Musarra. She warned him she is prepared to jail him for one year if there is any further trouble. On May 29, LoVallo is scheduled to sentence Shane, who was jailed for several weeks last month after prosecutors said he made several trips to Florida without court permission after the December trial. mgryta@buffnews.com Once again Matt does not tell the truth, what a sad informer he is! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #27 – May 29th, 2007 Shane is placed in jail illegally! An illegal arrest brought this about with the aid of incompetent representation! Attorney Mark Worrel fails to clear Shane’s name and we gave him $2500 to represent him in this case and the Hamburg incident. Impersonating an officer brings jail term By Matt Gryta NEWS STAFF REPORTER Updated: 05/30/07 6:55 AM Shane Buczek was ordered Tuesday to spend the next year in jail after a judge faulted him for “impersonating an officer” during an incident that started with an attempt to buy beer at HSBC Arena using privately minted coins. City Judge Sharon M. LoVallo had Buczek, 37, taken from court in handcuffs after telling him his latest conviction “is not about attempting to use Liberty Dollars at a hockey game.” A jury in December found Buczek and his father, Daniel, 57, a Derby businessman, guilty of criminal impersonation and harassment for fighting with HSBC security officer Edward M. Cotter and falsely claiming that Shane Buczek was a “federal agent” on Dec. 26, 2005. On May 16, LoVallo granted Daniel Buczek a conditional discharge, opting not to send him to jail on a first offense. She ordered him to perform 150 hours of community service by Sept. 1. In sending Shane Buczek to jail, LoVallo cited his past convictions “in other jurisdictions” and a civil suit pending against him by an automaker. He will serve his sentence in the Erie County Correctional Facility in Alden. Buczek, who came to court with his mother, father and several siblings, told the judge, “I kind of wish this [arena scuffle] hadn’t have happened.” After the judge mentioned the suit pending against Shane Buczek over a $45,000 Nissan SUV he registered in March in Florida, lawyer Mark A. Worrell told her that suit is “a civil matter” unrelated to the arena incident. Worrell conceded his client’s “somewhat checkered history,” arguing for leniency because “he’s learned his lesson.” Worrell also told the judge his client’s use of privately minted currency in the past was apparently based on “misadvice” he had received. Shane Buczek, who had earlier been jailed for about 40 days in connection with the arena incident, will remain in custody about six to seven months because under the state’s so called good-time sentencing laws he would only have had to serve eight months of a one year term. mgryta@buffnews.com another poor report given by Matt to the readers #29 – June 5th, 2007 Appeal is filed for Shane and I, finally. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #29 – June 20th, 2007 Shane went to Hamburg court today with Jim Ostrowski and. Musarra was not prepared so the court gave her one more day to prepare her position, very sad. The system attempts to burn you out by doing all those little things provoking you to be upset! The continuing saga of the corrupt system in Erie County! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #30 – June 21st, 2007 Shane appears before Hamburg Town Court. Shane has been in jail for 36 days now illegally, very sad. Judge Rooth accepts ACD (acquittal contemplating dismissal), what a sad acceptance of a plea by Jim O, but we have bigger fish to fry!

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 27

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #32 – June 22, 2007 Another disappointing day at city court! Judge Michael Petruska delayed releasing Shane, he needed time to review the motion Jim Ostrowski filed. What a joke! Molly is up to her dirty tricks again! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #33 – June 30th, 2007 Ostrowski receives a letter from Judge Michael Petruska on Saturday June 30th, stating that Shane could be released providing a $20,000 Bail Bond was given in his behalf. Jim Ostrowski did not know how to complete the paper work for us to achieve this. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #34 – July 2nd, 2007 I Dan Buczek had to call the Bonds people (Gist). Dolores Gist told me to get a certified copy of the appeal from Judge Michael Petruska and file it at the County Clerk office. At which point I would bring her $1,460 to cover the $20,000 bond. This is the 45th day that Shane has been illegally incarcerated since May 29th sentencing! Jim Ostrowski is going to file the necessary documents hopefully today. Much more to come stay turn! Most of the FBI's color of law investigations would fall into five broad areas: · excessive force; · sexual assaults; · false arrest/fabrication of evidence; · deprivation of property; and · failure to keep from harm. In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to utilize whatever force is "reasonably" necessary. The breath and scope of the use of force is vast. The spectrum begins with the physical presence of the official through the utilization of deadly force. While some types of force used by law enforcement may be violent by their very nature, they may be considered "reasonable," based upon the circumstances. However, violations of federal law occur where it can be shown that the force used was willfully "unreasonable" or "excessive" against individuals. Sexual assaults by officials acting under "color of law" could happen in a variety of venues. They could occur in court scenarios, jails, and/or traffic stops to name just a few of the settings where an official might use their position of authority to coerce another individual into sexual compliance. The compliance is generally gained because of a threat of an official action against the other if they do not comply. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures. A law enforcement official using his authority provided under the "color of law" is allowed to stop individuals and even if necessary to search them and retain their property under certain circumstances. It is in the abuse of that discretionary power that a violation of a person's civil rights might occur. An unlawful detention or an illegal confiscation of property would be examples of such an abuse of power. An official would violate the color of law statute by fabricating evidence against or conducting a false arrest of an individual. That person's rights of due process and unreasonable seizure have been violated. In the case of deprivation of property, the official would violate the color of saw statute by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining the property of another. In that case, the official has overstepped or misapplied his authority. The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process and the Eighth Amendment also prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. In an arrest or detention context, these rights would prohibit

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 28

the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The idea being that a person accused of a crime is to be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process. The public entrusts its law enforcement officials with protecting the community. If it is shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm that official could be in violation of the color of law statute. Filing a Complaint In order to file a complaint alleging a violation of the criminal laws discussed above, you may contact your local FBI office by telephone, in writing, or in person. The following information should be provided: · all identifying information for the victim(s); ·as much identifying information as possible for the subject(s), including position, rank, and agency employed; ·date and time of incident; ·location and time of incident; ·names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any witness(es); ·a complete chronology of events; and ·any report numbers and charges with respect to the incident. You may also contact the United States Attorney's Office in your district, or send a written complaint to:

Criminal Section Civil Rights Division

U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 66018

Washington, D.C. 20035-6018 Investigations vary in length and although there are internal limitations, the investigation will proceed to its logical conclusion. The FBI is the investigative component of the Department of Justice. It is, therefore, not responsible for the prosecution of a case. That is the responsibility of the Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., and the United States Attorney's Office within the local jurisdiction. After the FBI has completed its investigation, it forwards its findings to the United States Attorney's Office and to the Department of Justice. They then make the determination as to whether to proceed toward prosecution or not.

Civil Applications Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141, makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. This law gives DOJ the authority to seek civil remedies in cases where it is determined that law enforcement agencies have policies or practices which foster a pattern of misconduct by employees. This action is directed against an agency, not against individual officers. The types of issues which may initiate a Pattern and Practice investigation include: · Lack of supervision/monitoring of officers' actions. · Officers not providing justification or reporting incidents involving the use of force. · Lack of, or improper training of officers. · A department having a citizen complaint process which treats complainants as adversaries. Under Title 42, U.S.C., Section 1997, DOJ has the ability to initiate civil actions against mental hospitals, retardation facilities, jails, prisons, nursing homes, and juvenile detention facilities, when there are allegations of systemic derivations of the constitutional rights of institutionalized persons. The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution states, "Neither slavery nor involuntary

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 29

servitude, except as punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist in the United States. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation." These conditions, nevertheless, still exist in certain forms throughout the country. The majority of these cases typically involve migrant farm workers, immigrants, aliens or others who are forced to work under exploitative conditions and/or are held in involuntary servitude. Often these immigrants enter the country thinking that wonderful opportunities await them; however, once here, they are forced into involuntary servitude with little recourse for escape. Researchers have suggested that immigrant populations are victimized by crime at rates similar to the general population but their rates of reporting crime are lower. Furthermore, because of differences in language, cultural expectations, etc., they have a more difficult time dealing with law enforcement and may, in fact, avoid law enforcement. Aliens encountered in these situations, who may be in the United States illegally and have therefore violated the law, are subject to deportation. The prospect of being forced to leave the United States, no matter how degrading the current living conditions, sometimes serves as a deterrent to reporting the situation to law enforcement. The FBI's jurisdiction pertaining to color of law is primarily predicted on four federal statutes: 1) Title 18, United States Code (U.S.C.), Section 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights); 2) Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 (Deprivation of

Rights Under Color of Law);3)

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1001 (False Statements or Entries Generally); and

4) Title 42 U.S.C., Section 14141 (Pattern and Practice) WASHINGTON POST 2006 Derby, New York businessman Dan Buczek 55, and 7 family members and friends were enjoying an evening out like thousands of other Buffalo, New York area hockey fans on Dec. 26, 2005—cheering their favorite Buffalo Sabres on to victory over the New York Islanders. During the course of the evening, Buczek's daughter Amanda and her boyfriend, Joel Lattuca went to the HSBC refreshment stand to buy a beer and a hotdog. And that's where the Buczek family trouble began that evening. Amanda Buczek asked the refreshment stand vendor if he accepted Liberties—as the Buczeks quite often do when frequenting a new retail spot since, in the southtowns area, close to 30 businesses now accepted Liberties. They do so for only one reason. They believe Liberties are actually worth more than the US currency that is, by law, legal tender in America since the American dollar has not been backed by gold or silver since 1971. And, since most of the people who use Liberties don't know whether or not a business accepts the privately-minted silver coins or certificates as barter currency unless or until they ask-they generally

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 30

inquire. If the business says they don't, they do what you and I do—they pay for the products or services they are buying with greenbacks (the Federal Reserve banknotes that were created by the Roosevelt Administration on June 5, 1933 when newly elected Franklin D. Roosevelt unconstitutionally removed US currency from the gold standard with the Gold Repeal Joint Resolution that illegally canceled the gold clause in all federal and private debt obligations}. Our monetary system would not officially be divorced from the gold standard until 1971 when President Richard Nixon signed the 'divorce decree' (that was artfully buried in the Bretton-Woods Agreement). Gold and silver were no longer specie. They simply became a commodity. In doing so, Nixon and the Democrats that controlled Congress violated the Constitution since the only way our monetary system could legally be

divorced from gold and silver was through a constitutional amendment (according to Article 1, Section 10). For that matter, the Federal Reserve Act, signed into law on Dec. 23, 1913, was also unconstitutional since the Founding Fathers very carefully and very deliberately penned into the Constitution of the United States a provision—Article 1. Section 8—that prevented the nation's politicians from surrendering the power to "coin" money to private individuals. (It is important to understand that in 1787, all money was coin. While copper and bronze were used in some coins, the primary coinage was gold or silver. Paper money, used only in national emergencies, was called scrip. Scrip was redeemable in gold or silver at the end of whatever crisis allowed it to be printed. When the monetary powers were surrendered to the private bankers at the Fed, they argued that "coining" money and "printing" money were two entirely different facets of creating money, and that only the coining of money was reserved for the government. In point of fact, when the Constitution was ratified, all money was coin Today, the US Mint coins the pocket change we carry, and private bankers print the trillions of dollars that is circulated as legal tender.) The victims of this theft were—and are—the American people. Most Americans are unaware that when America's bankers and industrialists deliberately caused the Bank Panic of 1908 in order to "prepare" America for the legislation that would create a privately—owned central bank called the Federal Reserve System, the 16th Amendment to legalize an income tax and the 17th Amendment to eliminate the States from the equation of power, the bankers also attempted to ratify as the 18th Amendment a resolution remove the nation's monetary system from the gold standard. But not even those who favored silencing the voice of the States in the governing process, or creating the right to impose an income tax on its people were willing to debase its monetary system. Congress could not muster the votes needed to send the proposed 18th Amendment to the States for ratification. The Buczeks, like a growing number of anti—fiat Americans across the nation have discovered—and now use-an alternative form of "money" called "Liberties." Liberties are silver coins or silver certificates that, unlike the contemporary American dollar produced by the Federal Reserve System that is legal tender, are actually backed by silver—and have an actual net worth equal to its face value. Because thousands of Americans are now using them, and because an increasing number of businesses throughout the United States are accepting them, the Buczeks generally ask the merchants wherever they shop if they take Liberties when they purchase goods and services. And, that was what led Amanda Buczek to asked the food vendor at the Sabres hockey game if they accepted Liberties. Because the vendor did not accept "Liberties," Amanda Buczek paid for the beer and hot dogs with a Federal Reserve Note. As Joel Lattuca carried the beverages his girlfriend had just purchased back to her family, neither realized they were being followed by off—duty Buffalo Police Detective Edward Cotter. When Cotter began to interrogate Amanda and Joel about what he thought might be counterfeit

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 31

coins, Dan Buczek interjected himself into the discussion by asking Cotter who he was and what he wanted with his daughter. Cotter replied that he was head of security for the HSBC stadium, and he wanted to see the coin she was trying to use with the concession people. At that moment, Shane Buczek, Dan Buczek's eldest son joined the group and asked what was wrong. Cotter demanded to know who he was. As Dan Buczek produced his driver's license, Shane produced an Apostille badge. (An apostille badge is commonly used by notary publics. It is not a badge in the sense that police officers carry tin or bronze shields. It's simply an official ID card

encased in a hard see—through plastic holder. Many times today it is used by people whose driver's license has been suspended. Shane Buczek would later be accused by Cotter as posing as a federal agent and using his Apostille ID badge as his government ID card. According to those close to the Buczek case, Shane's apostille ID was issued by his church are were his ministerial credentials.)

When he saw Shane's "badge," Cotter 'trumped" him by producing his own Buffalo detective's shield, "I'm a Buffalo detective," Cotter said, "I'm off duty—and, I'm the head of security here." He told the Buczeks to "come with me." The Buczeks followed Cotter to an exit hallway near Section 316 where Cotter then ignored Amanda Buczek and Joel Lattuca—who had already given him one of the Liberty coins—and concentrated his wrath on Shane. "Where did you get this f*****g coin?" Cotter demanded, then looking at Shane, insisted on knowing if he was "...the same f***n' Shane Buczek that knows Billy Crawford"—another Buffalo police officer.

Years before Shane Buczek chummed around with several Buffalo police officers, Billy Crawford being one of them. Buczek insisted at that time that he was asked by Crawford to help the police in a sting operation. But, when the sting was over, Shane Buczek found himself in the county lockup. Buczek insisted the cops had tricked him into letting them use his credit card, and it was their signatures, not his, on the transactions they bought—and kept. Whatever the true details of that incident are, Shane Buczek served county time; and bad blood existed between Buczek and the Buffalo Police Department—except, it seems, with Billy Crawford. "I've been looking all over this f*****g stadium for you all night," Cotter told Shane, adding that he'd received reports from several vendors at the stadium that people were trying to buy beer with counterfeit coins—claiming the coins were worth $100 each. Cotter called the Buffalo police department for back—up to take the Buczeks into custody. Cotter accused Dan and Shane Buczek of trying to sell what he described as phony coins. (And, of course, Cotter—who didn't know Shane Buczek was at the hockey rink until he identified himself shortly after 8 p.m.—wanted Shane to believe that Cotter knew the coin "scam" was his, and that he'd been looking for him all evening.) Buczek explained that his daughter Amanda had tried to use the coins to pay for beer, as did two of his sons-Adam and Caleb. At no time, he said, did anyone try to sell anything to anyone—particularly since the value of the coins are imprinted on the reverse side of the Liberty.. IN addition, Buczek explained to Cotter, the coins were not counterfeit money. They were privately—minted Liberties that many storekeepers in that area accepted as money. Many Southtown businesses accept Liberties as cash. Daniel Hyman, owner of the Red Apple Convenience Store said that "...about 20 of my regular customers use them. They pay me with silver and they accept silver as change. With inflation and government deficits, I see more and more people who don't trust paper money anymore. Eventually, I hope the banks will accept Liberties for deposit." Shawn Clawges, owner of Openers' Grille in East Aurora admitted they also take the Liberties "...at par with dollars. They're a pretty coin, and they're backed with silver. It's a commodity that's going up in value-unlike the US dollar." All his children were doing, Buczek concluded, was trying to see if any of the beer vendors at the stadium accepted Liberties. Cotter continued to curse at Buczek as he cuffed him, saying, "You South Buffalo guys think you're tough-but you f*****g' G**d d*mn Timon boys ain't that tough now, are

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 32

you?" Cotter pulled the cuffs, jerking Buczek off balance. "I should tear your hair piece off your head!"

Cotter searched Dan Buczek and emptied his pockets, taking his comb, cell phone, his Sabres ticket—which Buczek wanted to save as a souvenir—his billfold plus several $20 Silver Liberties. Amanda, Adam and Caleb Buczek and Joel Lattuca—all of whom attempted to pay for beer or hotdogs with the silver liberties-were not detained. Only Shane Buczek and his father were arrested. They were charged with felony possession of forged instruments (the silver liberties). Shane Buczek was also charged with criminal impersonation when Cotter claimed the younger Buczek represented himself as a federal official with his Apostille ID card. When Buczek received his belongings back upon his release, he was so glad to get out of the hellhole jail, he scribbled his signature on the release form, grabbed his belongs and left. When he got home he would discover that there was $100 missing from his wallet, and all of the $20 coins—which Cotter decided were contraband—were gone as well. While he was in custody, Cotter accused Dan Buczek of stealing his Sabres ticket. Buczek was able to prove that his cousin had purchased the ticket. The Buczeks were detained at the HSBC stadium by Cotter and Buffalo police officers Jill Halor and George Wagner from 8:05 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. At that time, Dan and Shane Buczek were finally escorted from the stadium in handcuffs. They sat in a police cruiser for approximately 35 minutes. They were read their Miranda rights at 10:15 p.m. in front of the Buffalo Police Station after being grilled and threatened by Buffalo police officers for 2 hours and 5 minutes. It should be noted that at the time of their detention, and later arrest on felony charges, none of the Buczeks had done anything that should have merited scrutiny from the police—let alone the abusive treatment they received at the hands of "Buffalo's finest." Detective Edward Cotter's interest in the Buczeks was purely personal. He used his badge and his authority as a police officer to harass someone he disliked. Hopefully Internal Affairs will investigate Edward Cotter and pull his badge. This man should not be a police officer.

When the story hit the Buffalo News the following day, Erie County Prosecuting Attorney Frank J. Clark said the felony charges—which should never have been filed—would be reduced before the case went to trial. The case was scheduled to go to trial on Thursday, Jan. 26. Instead, in a hearing before the city court, the charges were reduced to misdemeanors, and the trial scheduled for Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2006. As Cotter tried to push the case, he called the Buffalo office of the Secret Service and asked the agents to investigate the counterfeiters they had locked up. Michael C. Bryant, special-agent-in-charge sent one of his agents to investigate. Cotter was disappointed to learn that no counterfeiting had taken place. Bryant told the media that "...we did send an agent to question [the Buczeks], but we determined this was not a counterfeiting case. Counterfeiting is when someone illegally makes a copy of actual US currency.." "Liberties are not made by the government," said Michael J. White, a Treasury spokesman noted. "No

business is required to accept Liberties," adding that while businesses are not required to accept Liberties as payment for goods and services, there are no laws preventing them from doing so if they

want. Liberties, like any other numismatic you own, are assets that must be included in your net worth for tax purposes.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 33

The Buczeks were placed in nine different holding cells over the 16 hours they were detained as Cotter used every trick he knew to find some way to make a charge stick that would-as he told told Dan Buczek—"send you son up the river for a long time." Cotter even offered to set Dan Buczek free if he would testify against his son. Testify to what? The Buczeks were required by Erie County Judge Joseph A. Fiorella to post bail of $2,500 each—a total of $5,000—to get out of jail. Fiorella thought the bail was reasonable due to the seriousness of the crime. Deborah Buczek, the wife of Dan Buczek, posted the bail for her husband and son at 12:22 p.m. Cotter held up the release of Dan and Shane Buczek until sheriff's deputies

pushed him to turn in the paperwork. At 2:35 a.m.—after enduring 6 hours and 30 minutes of Hell, two innocent men walked out of the Erie County Sheriff's Department lockup. As far as I can determine, there was only one guilty person in this sorry affair. And, he still wears a detective shield for the Buffalo Police Department. His name is Ed Cotter.

According to Bernard von NotHaus, the CEO of Liberty, more and more businesses in "pocket communities" across the country are beginning to accept the privately-minted, shiny Liberties as an alternate form of barter even though the coins are not legal tender and cannot be regarded as money. Quite naturally, the US Treasury does not approve their being in circulation and does everything it can to discourage people from using them. However, since the Liberties are not represented as US coinage, they are recognized as "collectibles" with a par value that the US government grudgingly tolerates.

© 2006 Jon C. Ryter - All Rights Reserved

Order Jon Ryter's book "Whatever Happened to America?" Conventions of a number of the States having, at the time of adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added, and as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution; Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two-thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States; all or any of which articles, when ratified by three-fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the said Constitution, namely: Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Amendment II A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment III No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 34

supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. Amendment VII In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. Amendment VIII Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. By Your wrongful, unlawful and unconstitutional actions, You not only deprived me of my Rights and powers guaranteed in the Constitutions, but You also deprived all People of this city of Buffalo their Constitutional Rights. How much is a Right worth? How much is a Right that is lost worth? How much is a life lost in service to one’s country worth? The value of a Right is incalculable and the value of a Right lost is unfathomable. Millions of American service people have given their lives to protect our Rights, yet, you and this city of Buffalo County of Erie and blatantly stole those Rights for which they bravely died. Your actions made certain that it would be impossible for me to be elected as city councilor, and in so doing, You also made certain that the People of this city would be deprived of their Rights to be represented by the ONLY Constitutional candidate Buffalo New York Republic has ever seen run for elective office, and will most likely ever see. Had the city not deprived me of a credible candidacy, and had it given me correct information and certified me in, I likely had an excellent chance of winning. Had I won, I would have made absolutely certain that all Constitutional requirements be upheld by this city, and all Constitutional Rights be upheld for all Citizens. You most likely have no conception of the vast improvements that could have taken place, virtually, overnight, by such Constitutional positions enacted by government, and how far and wide this return to Constitutional governance could have spread. That potential movement back to government of, by and for the People, was stopped by the actions of you and this city. However, such a movement would have so empowered the People and properly subordinated the machinery of government, which has so long abused and ignored the People’s Rights, that the very idea of it intimidated those who hold the real power, thus, they did not allow it to even begin. This is the ultimate in treason By JUDGE SHARON LO VALLO AND ED COTTER.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 35

If you disagree with anything in this letter, then rebut that with which you disagree, in writing, with particularity, to me, within 30 days of this letter’s date, and support your disagreement with evidence, fact and law. Your failure to respond, as stipulated, is your agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true, correct, legal, lawful, and is your irrevocable agreement attesting to this, fully binding upon you, in any court in America, without your protest or objection or that of those who represent you.

NOTICE TO AGENTS/OFFICERS OF THE UNITED STATES THIS PRESENTMENT IS UTTERED WITH PEACEFUL AND HONORABLE INTENTIONS. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO HARASS, INTIMIDATE, OFFEND, CONSPIRE, BLACKMAIL, COERCE, CAUSE ANXIETY, ALARM OR DISTRESS, OR IMPEDE ANY PUBLIC OBLIGATIONS. ANY AFFIRMATION CONTRARY TO THIS VERIFIED STATEMENT WILL COMPRISE A CONFESSION OF FRAUD UPON THE AGENCY OR COURT IN WHICH SUCH REPRESENTATION IS MADE.

All Rights Reserved, Shane Christopher Buczek The Buczek Family

cc. http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/ Current as of 6-19-06 Member Name DC Phone DC FAX Senator Charles Schumer (D- NY) 202-224-6542 202-228-3027 Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D- NY) 202-224-4451 202-228-0282 Representative Timothy H. Bishop (D - 01) 202-225-3826 202-225-3143 Representative Steve J. Israel (D - 02) 202-225-3335 202-225-4669 Representative Peter T. King (R - 03) 202-225-7896 202-226-2279 Representative Carolyn McCarthy (D - 04) 202-225-5516 202-225-5758 Representative Gary L. Ackerman (D - 05) 202-225-2601 202-225-1589 Representative Gregory W. Meeks (D - 06) 202-225-3461 202-226-4169 Representative Joseph Crowley (D - 07) 202-225-3965 202-225-1909 Representative Jerrold Nadler (D - 08) 202-225-5635 202-225-6923 Representative Anthony Weiner (D - 09) 202-225-6616 202-226-7253 Representative Edolphus Towns (D - 10) 202-225-5936 202-225-1018 Representative Yvette Clarke (D - 11) 202-225-6231 202-226-0112 Representative Nydia M. Velazquez (D - 12) 202-225-2361 202-226-0327 Representative Vito Fossella (R - 13) 202-225-3371 202-226-1272 Representative Carolyn B. Maloney (D - 14) 202-225-7944 202-225-4709 Representative Charles B. Rangel (D - 15) 202-225-4365 202-225-0816 Representative Jose E. Serrano (D - 16) 202-225-4361 202-225-6001 Representative Eliot L. Engel (D - 17) 202-225-2464 202-225-5513 Representative Nita M. Lowey (D - 18) 202-225-6506 202-225-0546 Representative John Hall (D - 19) 202-225-5441 202-225-3289 Representative Kirsten Gillibrand (D - 20) 202-225-5614 202-225-1168

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 36

Member Name DC Phone DC FAX Representative Michael R. McNulty (D - 21) 202-225-5076 202-225-5077 Representative Maurice D. Hinchey (D - 22) 202-225-6335 202-226-0774 Representative John M. McHugh (R - 23) 202-225-4611 202-226-0621 Representative Michael Arcuri (D - 24) 202-225-3665 202-225-1891 Representative James T. Walsh (R - 25) 202-225-3701 202-225-4042 Representative Thomas M. Reynolds (R - 26) 202-225-5265 202-225-5910 Representative Brian M. Higgins (D - 27) 202-225-3306 202-226-0347 Representative Louise McIntosh Slaughter (D - 28) 202-225-3615 202-225-7822 Representative John R. (Randy) Kuhl, Jr. (R - 29) 202-225-3161 202-226-6599 Senator Richard C. Shelby (R- AL) 202-224-5744 202-224-3416 Senator Jeff Sessions (R- AL) 202-224-4124 202-224-3149 Senator Ted Stevens (R- AK) 202-224-3004 202-224-2354 Senator Lisa Murkowski (R- AK) 202-224-6665 202-224-5301 Senator John McCain (R- AZ) 202-224-2235 202-228-2862 Senator Jon Kyl (R- AZ) 202-224-4521 202-224-2207 Senator Blanche Lambert Lincoln (D- AR) 202-224-4843 202-228-1371 Senator Mark Pryor (D- AR) 202-224-2353 202-228-0908 Senator Dianne Feinstein (D- CA) 202-224-3841 202-228-3954 Senator Barbara Boxer (D- CA) 202-224-3553 202-228-2382 Senator Wayne Allard (R- CO) 202-224-5941 202-224-6471 Senator Ken Salazar (D- CO) 202-224-5852 202-228-5036 Senator Christopher J. Dodd (D- CT) 202-224-2823 202-224-1083 Senator Joseph I. Lieberman (D- CT) 202-224-4041 202-224-9750 Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (D- DE) 202-224-5042 202-224-0139 Senator Thomas R. Carper (D- DE) 202-224-2441 202-228-2190 Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D - At Large) 202-225-8050 202-225-3002 Senator Bill Nelson (D- FL) 202-224-5274 202-228-2183 Senator Mel Martinez (R- FL) 202-224-3041 202-228-5171 Senator Saxby Chambliss (R- GA) 202-224-3521 202-224-0103 Senator Johnny Isakson (R- GA) 202-224-3643 202-228-0724 Senator Daniel K. Inouye (D- HI) 202-224-3934 202-224-6747 Senator Daniel K. Akaka (D- HI) 202-224-6361 202-224-2126 Senator Larry E. Craig (R- ID) 202-224-2752 202-228-1067 Senator Mike Crapo (R- ID) 202-224-6142 202-228-1375 Senator Richard J. Durbin (D- IL) 202-224-2152 202-228-0400 Senator Barack Obama (D- IL) 202-224-2854 202-228-4260 Senator Richard G. Lugar (R- IN) 202-224-4814 202-228-0360 Senator Evan Bayh (D- IN) 202-224-5623 202-228-1377 Senator Charles E. Grassley (R- IA) 202-224-3744 202-224-6020 Senator Tom Harkin (D- IA) 202-224-3254 202-224-9369 Senator Sam Brownback (R- KS) 202-224-6521 202-228-1265 Senator Pat Roberts (R- KS) 202-224-4774 202-224-3514

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 37

Member Name DC Phone DC FAX Senator Mitch McConnell (R- KY) 202-224-2541 202-224-2499 Senator Jim Bunning (R- KY) 202-224-4343 202-228-1373 Senator Mary Landrieu (D- LA) 202-224-5824 202-224-9735 Senator David Vitter (R- LA) 202-224-4623 202-228-5061 Senator Olympia Snowe (R- ME) 202-224-5344 202-224-1946 Senator Susan Collins (R- ME) 202-224-2523 202-224-2693 Senator Paul S. Sarbanes (D- MD) 202-224-4524 202-224-1651 Senator Barbara A. Mikulski (D- MD) 202-224-4654 202-224-8858 Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D- MA) 202-224-4543 202-224-2417 Senator John F. Kerry (D- MA) 202-224-2742 202-224-8525 Senator Carl Levin (D- MI) 202-224-6221 202-224-1388 Senator Debbie A. Stabenow (D- MI) 202-224-4822 202-228-0325 Senator Mark Dayton (D- MN) 202-224-3244 202-228-2186 Senator Norm Coleman (R- MN) 202-224-5641 202-224-1152 Senator Thad Cochran (R- MS) 202-224-5054 202-224-9450 Senator Trent Lott (R- MS) 202-224-6253 202-224-2262 Senator Christopher S. Bond (R- MO) 202-224-5721 202-224-8149 Senator Jim Talent (R- MO) 202-224-6154 202-228-1518 Senator Max Baucus (D- MT) 202-224-2651 202-224-0515 Senator Conrad R. Burns (R- MT) 202-224-2644 202-224-8594 Senator Chuck Hagel (R- NE) 202-224-4224 202-224-5213 Senator Ben Nelson (D- NE) 202-224-6551 202-228-0012 Senator Harry Reid (D- NV) 202-224-3542 202-224-7327 Senator John Ensign (R- NV) 202-224-6244 202-228-2193 Senator Judd Gregg (R- NH) 202-224-3324 202-224-4952 Senator John Sununu (R- NH) 202-224-2841 202-228-4131 Senator Frank Lautenberg (D- NJ) 202-224-3224 202-228-4054 Senator Robert Menendez (D- NJ) 202-224-4744 202-228-2197 Senator Pete V. Domenici (R- NM) 202-224-6621 202-228-0900 Senator Jeff Bingaman (D- NM) 202-224-5521 202-224-2852 Senator Elizabeth Dole (R- NC) 202-224-6342 202-224-1100 Senator Richard Burr (R- NC) 202-224-3154 202-228-2981 Senator Kent Conrad (D- ND) 202-224-2043 202-224-7776 Senator Byron L. Dorgan (D- ND) 202-224-2551 202-224-1193 Senator Mike DeWine (R- OH) 202-224-2315 202-224-6519 Senator George Voinovich (R- OH) 202-224-3353 202-228-1382 Senator James M. Inhofe (R- OK) 202-224-4721 202-228-0380 Senator Tom Coburn (R- OK) 202-224-5754 202-224-6008 Senator Ron Wyden (D- OR) 202-224-5244 202-228-2717 Senator Gordon Smith (R- OR) 202-224-3753 202-228-3997 Senator Arlen Specter (R- PA) 202-224-4254 202-228-1229 Senator Rick Santorum (R- PA) 202-224-6324 202-228-0604

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 38

Member Name DC Phone DC FAX Senator Jack Reed (D- RI) 202-224-4642 202-224-4680 Senator Lincoln D. Chafee (R- RI) 202-224-2921 202-228-2853 Senator Lindsey Graham (R- SC) 202-224-5972 202-224-3808 Senator James DeMint (R- SC) 202-224-6121 202-228-5143 Senator Tim Johnson (D- SD) 202-224-5842 202-228-5765 Senator John R. Thune (R- SD) 202-224-2321 202-228-5429 Senator William H. Frist (R- TN) 202-224-3344 202-228-1264 Senator Lamar Alexander (R- TN) 202-224-4944 202-228-3398 Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R- TX) 202-224-5922 202-224-0776 Senator John Cornyn (R- TX) 202-224-2934 202-228-2856 Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R- UT) 202-224-5251 202-224-6331 Senator Robert F. Bennett (R- UT) 202-224-5444 202-228-1168 Senator Patrick J. Leahy (D- VT) 202-224-4242 202-224-3479 Senator James M. Jeffords (I- VT) 202-224-5141 202-228-0776 Senator John W. Warner (R- VA) 202-224-2023 202-224-6295 Senator George Allen (R- VA) 202-224-4024 202-224-5432 Senator Patty Murray (D- WA) 202-224-2621 202-224-0238 Senator Maria Cantwell (D- WA) 202-224-3441 202-228-0514 Senator Robert C. Byrd (D- WV) 202-224-3954 202-228-0002 Senator John D. Rockefeller, IV (D- WV) 202-224-6472 202-224-7665 Senator Herb Kohl (D- WI) 202-224-5653 202-224-9787 Senator Russell D. Feingold (D- WI) 202-224-5323 202-224-2725 Senator Craig Thomas (R- WY) 202-224-6441 202-224-1724 Senator Michael Enzi (R- WY) 202-224-3424 202-228-0359

Office of the Director Phone Fax Michael Battle Director 202.514.2121 202.616.2278 John Kelly Deputy Director and Chief of Staff 202.514.2121 202.616.2278 Steve Parent Acting Deputy Director 202.514.4506 202.514.5850 Natalie Voris Acting Deputy Director 202.514.2121 202.616.2278

Judith Beeman AGAC Liaison / US Attorneys' Manual 202.514.4633 202.514.5850

Natalie Voris Acting Counsel to the Director 202.616.2121 202.305.4937 Natalie Voris Associate Counsel to the Director 202.616.2121 202.305.4937

John Raymond Associate Director, Administrative Officer 202.616.6900 202.616.6648

Barbara Tone Assistant Director, Data Analysis 202.616.6779 202.616.5186

Chris Barnes Assistant Director, Evaulation and Review Staff 202.616.6776 202.616.1685

Marie O'Rourke Victims' Rights Ombudsman 202.616.0003 202.305.4937 Chicago Crime Commission 79 W. Monroe, Suite 80 Chicago, IL 60603 USA

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 39

PHONE: (312) 372-0101 FAX: (312) 372-6286 Patrick J. Fitzgerald Special Counsel DOJ Chicago Office: Dirksen Federal Building 219 South Dearborn Street, Fifth Floor Chicago, Illinois 60604

Washington Office: Bond Federal Building 1400 New York Avenue, NW, Ninth Floor Washington D.C. 20530

Chief Justices MASSACHUSETTS Honorable Margaret H. Marshall Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts One Beacon Street, Third Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02108-3107

(617) 557-1040 FAX (617) 557-1091

NEW YORK Honorable Judith S. Kaye Chief Judge of the State of New York 230 Park Avenue, Ste. 826 New York, New York 10169 NYC: (212) 661-6787 FAX (212) 682-2778

Albany: (518) 455-7741 FAX (518) 455-7896 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ATTORNEYS GENERAL 750 FIRST STREET NE SUITE 1100 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20002 (202) 326-6259 (202) 349-1922 2030 M Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202-326-6000 | Fax: 202-331-1427

Attorney General Robert Spagnoletti 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 409

Washington, DC 20004 (202) 727-3400

Attorney General J. Joseph Curran 200 St. Paul Place Baltimore, MD 21202 telephone(410) 576-6300

Attorney General Tom Reilly Western Massachusetts Division 1350 Main Street, 4th Floor Springfield, MA 01103-1629 Tel: (413) 784-1240 Fax: (413) 784-1244

Attorney General Eliot Spitzer 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271 (212) 416-6229

Maryland FBI Baltimore 2600 Lord Baltimore Baltimore, Maryland 21244 http://baltimore.fbi.gov (410) 265-8080

Massachusetts FBI Boston Suite 600 One Center Plaza Boston, Massachusetts 02108 http://boston.fbi.gov (617) 742-5533

(505) 889-1300 New York FBI Albany 200 McCarty Avenue Albany, New York 12209

http://albany.fbi.gov

(518) 465-7551 FBI Buffalo One FBI Plaza Buffalo, New York 14202-2698 http://buffalo.fbi.gov

(716) 856-7800

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 40

FBI New York 26 Federal Plaza, 23rd. Floor New York, New York 10278-0004 http://www.newyork.fbi.gov RE: Adamson v. California June 23, 1947., The first ten amendments were proposed and adopted largely because of fear that Government might unduly interfere with prized individual liberties. The people wanted and demanded a Bill of Rights written into their Constitution. The amendments embodying the Bill of Rights were intended to curb all branches of the Federal Government in the fields touched by the amendments -- Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. The Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments

were pointedly aimed at confining exercise of power by courts.

5. TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > Sec. 1988. 6. Clerk's filing fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Waived 7. Process server's fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Waived 8. Other (specify): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,000,000.00 per color of law violation 9. Enter default of defendant (names): ___________________________, ___________________________, ___________________________, ET AL Respondents, ( Estate of Macias v. Lopez, 42 F. Supp.2d 957, 962 (N.D. Cal. 1999). Per Defendant, Violation of Constitutional rights by custom & policy. TOTAL _______defendants time violations is the sum of _____________________ Payable in gold or silver per Section. 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Manqué and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS > Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading e) Pleading to be Concise and Direct; Consistency Each averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct. No technical forms of pleading or motions are required. (f) Construction of Pleadings; All pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations. 41

Sui Juris NO RIGHTS WAIVED DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. SIGNATURE PAGE 1.) Our names are ____________ 2.) Our title is Secured Party and Sovereign. 3.) Our names and spelling is only exactly as: ____________. We do in fact, do not use any other, nor do we allow any other form of our name, nor capitalization. 4.) We have personal knowledge of the facts in this matter. 5.) We are acting as my own counsel in our own proper persons: In Propria Persona Suri Juris; and, 6.) That we are NOT PRO SE. Any such assertion is an overt lie, as people making such claim

have knowledge of the law and are making claims for other malicious designs in which to disenfranchise and/or enslave us to them and/or their system which grants them remuneration.

7.) That we are in fact, ready to affirm knowing full well the laws for perjury in the state of Texas, and in fact will attest to the same in any court of law regarding the matters submitted in this statement, when we are required to testify in any court of law thereof in relation to support the truth to these matters.

8.) Per Puckett v. Cox & Gideon v. Wainwright My pleadings need not to be within the same standards as an attorney, CLER$$RULE 03-29-05 10:46:40 PGT•CTRULE 36 SUPREME COURT RULE 29 When a party is not represented by counsel, service shall be made on the party, personally, by mail, or by commercial carrier. Ordinarily, service on a party must be by a manner at least as expeditious as the manner used to file the document with the Court. 9.) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading e) Pleading to be Concise and Direct; Consistency Each averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct. No technical forms of pleading or motions are required. (f) Construction of Pleadings; All pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice. (this means you have to show constitutional violations of your rights.) I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (28 U.S.C. § 1746) DATED: Error! Unknown character in picture string. Signed _______________________________________________________________ Notary Public

All Rights Reserved by the Citizen and None Waived. Article. IV.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Notice of Unconstitutional exercise of law. Jury tampering and Color of law Violations.

42