budgetary and other constraints on choice

80
1 Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

Upload: john-bruce

Post on 08-Jan-2018

231 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Consumption Choice Sets A consumption choice set is the collection of all consumption choices available to the consumer. What constrains consumption choice? Budgetary, time and other resource limitations.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

1

Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

Page 2: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

2

Consumption Choice Sets

A consumption choice set is the collection of all consumption choices available to the consumer.

What constrains consumption choice?

Budgetary, time and other resource limitations.

Page 3: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

3

Budget Constraints

A consumption bundle containing x1 units of commodity 1, x2 units of commodity 2 and so on up to xn units of commodity n is denoted by the vector (x1, x2, … , xn).

Commodity prices are p1, p2, … , pn.

Page 4: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

4

Budget Constraints

Q: When is a consumption bundle (x1, … , xn) affordable at given prices p1, … , pn?

Page 5: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

5

Budget Constraints Q: When is a bundle (x1, … , xn)

affordable at prices p1, … , pn?

A: When p1x1 + … + pnxn mwhere m is the consumer’s (disposable) income.

Page 6: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

6

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commoditiesx2

x1

Budget constraint isp1x1 + p2x2 = m.

m /p1

m /p2

Page 7: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

7

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commoditiesx2

x1

Budget constraint isp1x1 + p2x2 = m.m /p2

m /p1

Page 8: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

8

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commoditiesx2

x1

Budget constraint isp1x1 + p2x2 = m.

m /p1

Just affordable

m /p2

Page 9: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

9

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commoditiesx2

x1

Budget constraint isp1x1 + p2x2 = m.

m /p1

Just affordableNot affordable

m /p2

Page 10: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

10

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commoditiesx2

x1

Budget constraint isp1x1 + p2x2 = m.

m /p1

AffordableJust affordable

Not affordable

m /p2

Page 11: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

11

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commoditiesx2

x1

Budget constraint isp1x1 + p2x2 = m.

m /p1

BudgetSet

the collection of all affordable bundles.

m /p2

Page 12: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

12

Budget Set and Constraint for Two Commoditiesx2

x1

p1x1 + p2x2 = m is x2 = -(p1/p2)x1 + m/p2

so slope is -p1/p2.

m /p1

BudgetSet

m /p2

Page 13: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

13

Budget Constraints For n = 2 and x1 on the horizontal

axis, the constraint’s slope is -p1/p2. What does it mean?

x pp

x mp2

121

2

Page 14: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

14

Budget Constraints For n = 2 and x1 on the horizontal

axis, the constraint’s slope is -p1/p2. What does it mean?

Increasing x1 by 1 must reduce x2 by p1/p2.

See Notes

x pp

x mp2

121

2

Page 15: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

15

Budget Sets & Constraints; Income and Price Changes

The budget constraint and budget set depend upon prices and income. What happens as prices or income change?

Page 16: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

16

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as income m

increases?

Originalbudget set

x2

x1

Page 17: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

17

Higher income gives more choice

Originalbudget set

New affordable consumptionchoices

x2

x1

Original andnew budgetconstraints areparallel (sameslope).

Page 18: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

18

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as income m

decreases?

Originalbudget set

x2

x1

Page 19: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

19

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as income m

decreases?x2

x1

New, smallerbudget set

Consumption bundlesthat are no longeraffordable.Old and new

constraintsare parallel.

Page 20: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

20

Budget Constraints - Income Changes

Increases in income m shift the constraint outward in a parallel manner, thereby enlarging the budget set and improving choice.

Decreases in income m shift the constraint inward in a parallel manner, thereby shrinking the budget set and reducing choice.

Page 21: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

21

Budget Constraints - Income Changes

No original choice is lost and new choices are added when income increases, so higher income cannot make a consumer worse off.

An income decrease may (typically will) make the consumer worse off.

Page 22: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

22

Budget Constraints - Price Changes

What happens if just one price decreases?

Suppose p1 decreases.

Page 23: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

23

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as p1 decreases

from p1’ to p1”?

Originalbudget set

x2

x1

m/p2

m/p1’ m/p1”

-p1’/p2

Page 24: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

24

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as p1 decreases

from p1’ to p1”?

Originalbudget set

x2

x1

m/p2

m/p1’ m/p1”

New affordable choices

-p1’/p2

Page 25: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

25

How do the budget set and budget constraint change as p1 decreases

from p1’ to p1”?

Originalbudget set

x2

x1

m/p2

m/p1’ m/p1”

New affordable choices

Budget constraint pivots; slope flattens from -p1’/p2 to -p1”/p2

-p1’/p2

-p1”/p2

Page 26: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

26

Budget Constraints - Price Changes

Reducing the price of one commodity pivots the constraint outward. No old choice is lost and new choices are added, so reducing one price cannot make the consumer worse off.

Page 27: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

27

Budget Constraints - Price Changes

Similarly, increasing one price pivots the constraint inwards, reduces choice and may (typically will) make the consumer worse off.

The rate of exchange chance (see an example).

Page 28: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

28

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxes A uniform sales tax levied at rate t

changes the constraint from p1x1 + p2x2 = mto (1+t)p1x1 + (1+t)p2x2 = m

Page 29: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

29

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxes A uniform sales tax levied at rate t changes

the constraint from p1x1 + p2x2 = mto (1+t)p1x1 + (1+t)p2x2 = mi.e. p1x1 + p2x2 = m/(1+t).

Case for tax quantity Case for tax on both sales tax and income

Page 30: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

30

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxesx2

x1

mp2

mp1

p1x1 + p2x2 = m

Page 31: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

31

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxesx2

x1

mp2

mp1

p1x1 + p2x2 = m

p1x1 + p2x2 = m/(1+t)

mt p( )1 1

mt p( )1 2

Page 32: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

32

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxesx2

x1

mt p( )1 2

mp2

mt p( )1 1

mp1

Equivalent income lossis

m mt

tt

m

1 1

Page 33: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

33

Uniform Ad Valorem Sales Taxes Case for tax quantity

Case for sales tax and income tax Quantity subsidy (see notes) Value Subsidy (see notes) Lump-sum tax or subsidy (see notes)

Budget set with rationing (see notes)

Page 34: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

34

Preferences

Page 35: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

35

Rationality in Economics

Behavioral Postulate:A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set of available alternatives.

So to model choice we must model decisionmakers’ preferences.

Page 36: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

36

Preference Relations Comparing two different consumption

bundles, x and y: strict preference: x is more preferred

than is y. weak preference: x is as at least as

preferred as is y. indifference: x is exactly as preferred as

is y.

Page 37: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

37

Preference Relations

Strict preference, weak preference and indifference are all preference relations.

Particularly, they are ordinal relations; i.e. they state only the order in which bundles are preferred.

Page 38: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

38

Preference Relations

denotes strict preference; x y means that bundle x is preferred strictly to bundle y.

Page 39: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

39

Preference Relations

denotes strict preference so x y means that bundle x is preferred strictly to bundle y.

denotes indifference; x y means x and y are equally preferred.

denotes weak preference;x y means x is preferred at least as much as is y.

~~

Page 40: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

40

Assumptions about Preference Relations

Completeness: For any two bundles x and y it is always possible to make the statement that either x y or y x.

~

~

Page 41: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

41

Assumptions about Preference Relations

Reflexivity: Any bundle x is always at least as preferred as itself; i.e.

x x.~

Page 42: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

42

Assumptions about Preference Relations

Transitivity: Ifx is at least as preferred as y, andy is at least as preferred as z, thenx is at least as preferred as z; i.e.

x y and y z x z.~ ~ ~

Page 43: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

43

Indifference Curves

Take a reference bundle x’. The set of all bundles equally preferred to x’ is the indifference curve containing x’; the set of all bundles y x’.

Page 44: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

44

Indifference Curves

xx22

xx11

x”x”

x”’x”’

x’ x’ x” x” x”’ x”’x’

Page 45: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

45

Indifference Curves

xx22

xx11

zz xx yy

x

y

z

Page 46: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

46

Indifference Curves

x2

x1

xAll bundles in I1 arestrictly preferred to all in I2.

y

z

All bundles in I2 are strictly preferred to all in I3.

I1

I2

I3

Page 47: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

47

Indifference Curves

x2

x1

I(x’)

x

I(x)

WP(x), the set of bundles weakly preferred to x.

Page 48: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

48

Indifference Curves

x2

x1

WP(x), the set of bundles weakly preferred to x.

WP(x) includes I(x).

x

I(x)

Page 49: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

49

Indifference Curves

x2

x1

SP(x), the set of bundles strictly preferred to x, does not include I(x).

x

I(x)

Page 50: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

50

Indifference Curves Cannot Intersect

xx22

xx11

xxyy

zz

II11

I2 From IFrom I11, x , x y. From I y. From I22, x , x z. z.Therefore y Therefore y z. z.

Page 51: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

51

Indifference Curves Cannot Intersect

xx22

xx11

xxyy

zz

II11

I2 From IFrom I11, x , x y. From I y. From I22, x , x z. z.Therefore y Therefore y z. But from I z. But from I11 and Iand I22 we see y z, a we see y z, a contradiction. contradiction.

Page 52: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

52

Slopes of Indifference Curves

When more of a commodity is always preferred, the commodity is a good.

If every commodity is a good then indifference curves are negatively sloped.

Page 53: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

53

Slopes of Indifference Curves

BetterBetter

Worse

Worse

Good 2Good 2

Good 1Good 1

Two goodsTwo goodsa negatively sloped a negatively sloped indifference curve.indifference curve.

Page 54: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

54

Slopes of Indifference Curves

If less of a commodity is always preferred then the commodity is a bad.

Page 55: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

55

Slopes of Indifference Curves

Better

Better

WorseWorse

Good 2Good 2

Bad 1Bad 1

One good and oneOne good and onebad a bad a positively sloped positively sloped indifference curve.indifference curve.

Page 56: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

56

Utility Functions

A preference relation that is complete, reflexive, transitive and continuous can be represented by a continuous utility function.

Continuity means that small changes to a consumption bundle cause only small changes to the preference level.

Page 57: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

57

Utility Functions

A utility function U(x) represents a preference relation if and only if:

x’ x” U(x’) > U(x”)

x’ x” U(x’) < U(x”)

x’ x” U(x’) = U(x”).

~

Page 58: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

58

Utility Functions

Utility is an ordinal (i.e. ordering) concept.

E.g. if U(x) = 6 and U(y) = 2 then bundle x is strictly preferred to bundle y.

Page 59: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

59

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves Consider the bundles (4,1), (2,3) and

(2,2). Suppose (2,3) (4,1) (2,2). Assign to these bundles any numbers

that preserve the preference ordering;e.g. U(2,3) = 6 > U(4,1) = U(2,2) = 4.

Call these numbers utility levels.

Page 60: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

60

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves

An indifference curve contains equally preferred bundles.

Equal preference same utility level. Therefore, all bundles in an

indifference curve have the same utility level.

Page 61: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

61

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves So the bundles (4,1) and (2,2) are in

the indiff. curve with utility level U

But the bundle (2,3) is in the indiff. curve with utility level U 6.

On an indifference curve diagram, this preference information looks as follows:

Page 62: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

62

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves

U 6U 4

(2,3) (2,2) (4,1)

x1

x2

Page 63: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

63

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves

Another way to visualize this same information is to plot the utility level on a vertical axis.

Page 64: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

64

U(2,3) = 6

U(2,2) = 4 U(4,1) = 4

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves3D plot of consumption & utility levels for 3 bundles

x1

x2

Utility

Page 65: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

65

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves

This 3D visualization of preferences can be made more informative by adding into it the two indifference curves.

Page 66: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

66

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves

U

U

Higher indifferencecurves containmore preferredbundles.

Utility

x2

x1

Page 67: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

67

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves

Comparing more bundles will create a larger collection of all indifference curves and a better description of the consumer’s preferences.

Page 68: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

68

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves

U 6U 4U 2

x1

x2

Page 69: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

69

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves

As before, this can be visualized in 3D by plotting each indifference curve at the height of its utility index.

Page 70: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

70

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves

U 6U 5U 4U 3U 2U 1

x1

x2

Utility

Page 71: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

71

Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves

The collection of all indifference curves for a given preference relation is an indifference map.

An indifference map is equivalent to a utility function; each is the other.

Page 72: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

72

Utility Functions

There is no unique utility function representation of a preference relation.

Suppose U(x1,x2) = x1x2 represents a preference relation.

Again consider the bundles (4,1),(2,3) and (2,2).

Page 73: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

73

Utility Functions U(x1,x2) = x1x2, so

U(2,3) = 6 > U(4,1) = U(2,2) = 4;

that is, (2,3) (4,1) (2,2). Definir transformación monótona

(ver notas)

Page 74: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

74

Utility Functions U(x1,x2) = x1x2 (2,3) (4,1) (2,2). Define V = U2.

Page 75: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

75

Utility Functions U(x1,x2) = x1x2 (2,3) (4,1) (2,2). Define V = U2. Then V(x1,x2) = x1

2x22 and

V(2,3) = 36 > V(4,1) = V(2,2) = 16so again(2,3) (4,1) (2,2).

V preserves the same order as U and so represents the same preferences.

Page 76: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

76

Goods, Bads and Neutrals A good is a commodity unit which

increases utility (gives a more preferred bundle).

A bad is a commodity unit which decreases utility (gives a less preferred bundle).

A neutral is a commodity unit which does not change utility (gives an equally preferred bundle).

Page 77: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

77

Goods, Bads and NeutralsUtility

Waterx’

Units ofwater aregoods

Units ofwater arebads

Around x’ units, a little extra water is a neutral.

Utilityfunction

Page 78: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

78

Some Other Utility Functions and Their Indifference Curves

Instead of U(x1,x2) = x1x2 considerV(x1,x2) = x1 + x2. What do the indifference curves for

this “perfect substitution” utility function look like?

Page 79: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

79

Perfect Substitution Indifference Curves

5

5

9

9

13

13

x1

x2

x1 + x2 = 5

x1 + x2 = 9

x1 + x2 = 13

V(x1,x2) = x1 + x2.

Page 80: Budgetary and Other Constraints on Choice

80

Perfect Substitution Indifference Curves

5

5

9

9

13

13

x1

x2

x1 + x2 = 5

x1 + x2 = 9

x1 + x2 = 13

All are linear and parallel.

V(x1,x2) = x1 + x2.