building a new royalty company - iis windows...
TRANSCRIPT
2
Forward-Looking Statements• Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors that
could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitations: fluctuation in precious metal prices, currency exchange rates and equity markets; uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and other tests; possible variations in ore grade and recovery rates; risks of delays, accidents, equipment breakdowns, labour disputes or other difficulties with or interruptions in production or arsenic treatment; the possibility of unanticipated costs or expenses related to mining, processing, mine closures; the risk that adequate financing will not be available in a timely manner, or favourable terms or at all; uncertainties associated with the need for government approvals or cooperation of governmental agencies and other risks.
• Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of management at the date the statements are made. IRC does not undertake to update forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions or other circumstances should change.
• Resource Estimates - All “resource” estimates included in this presentation were prepared in accordance with the National Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators and the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Classification System. These standards differ significantly from the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In particular, “resources” are not the equivalent of “reserves” and the Securities and Exchange Commission does not normally permit the use of the term “resources” or of resource estimates in documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, information included in the presentation may not be comparable to information disclosed by United States mining companies.
• IRC does not operate or explore but relies on others. Because it is not the operator, it must rely on decisions made by others, decisions on which it has no influence.
• See Preliminary Prospectus for additional details. • See also Qualified Persons report prepared by William J Crowl of Gustavson Associates LLC
(“Gustavson”) and the disclosure on p. 17 of the Preliminary Prospectus regarding the Independent Consultant’s Report.
3
“The best business is a royalty on the growth of others - requiring little capital itself.1”
Warren BuffettChairman-Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
1 Berkshire Hathaway 1978 annual report
4
Investment Highlights• 2.70% NSR on the Voisey’s Bay mine forms cornerstone
- One of the world’s largest mineral royalties- Open pit / underground nickel, copper, cobalt mine- Long life, low-cost producer- Exposure to Canada’s premier new nickel mine- Acquisition subject to meeting ordinary closing conditions
• Over 60 other royalties- Exposure to multiple commodities, geography, project status- Energy component with coal and oil royalties- Diamond royalties on 20+ million acres- Majority located in North America: politically stable regions
• >2,000 other royalties identified and to be investigated
• Growth through deal making / royalty creation
• High margin business: high return on capital
5
Risk Factors NSR Working InterestCapital Costs No YesMining Costs No YesProcessing Costs No YesMine Site G&A Costs No YesEnvironmental Liabilities No YesLabor Costs No YesSmelting & Refining Costs Yes YesTransportation Costs Yes Yes
NSR Royalties Are Not Working Interests
NSR = Gross Revenues – Smelting, Refining, Transport costsRoyalties pay even if the operator is losing money on the mine Principal royalty risk is the mine closing
6
High Margin Opportunity•IRC expects very high EBITDA margins and compares favorably with other royalty companies*
•IRC’s expected EBITDA margins are significantly higher than operating mining companies**
*IRC and Silver Wheaton figures based on Haywood estimates for 2006, Royal Gold figures based on 2004 Annual Report IRC’s 2007 EBITDA margin is 90.5%. IRC estimate based on US$6.00/lb Ni price.
**Figures based on financials for the year ended December 31, 2003
Haywood prepared slide.
EBITDA Margin94.6%
87.6%
72.7%60.5%
49.2% 46.7%35.2%
17.6% 16.7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SilverWheaton
IRC RoyalGold
Goldcorp WheatonRiver
Lionore Glamis Teck Noranda
7
Voisey’s Bay Project
Reference: Inco website
Reference: A. Chislett, October 2004
Reference: Inco website
Reference: A. Chislett, October 2004
8
Voisey’s Bay StatisticsOperator: Inco LimitedCapital Committed: CAD$2.33 billion (30 years)
~CAD$900 million (Phase I)Mining Method: Open pit / undergroundProduction: 110 MM lbs Ni / Yr
85 MM lbs Cu / Yr5 MM lbs Co / Yr
Cash Costs: US$0.93/ lb NiMine Life: Long LifeCost Curve: Lowest 10%1
Royalty Start-up: Early 20061 www.minecost.com
10
Voisey’s Bay 2.70% NSR Economics2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Concentrates ‘000 t 1,612 1,944 2,016 2,131 2,190Gross Revenues US$ MM $659 $872 $738 $724 $723Smelting, Trans., Refining US$ MM $ 98 $129 $129 $127 $126Net Smelter Return: US$ MM $561 $743 $608 $598 $5962.70% NSR: US$ MM $15.1 $20.1 $16.4 $16.1 $16.1Labrador Tax: US$ MM $ 3.0 $ 4.0 $ 3.3 $ 3.2 $ 3.2Net Revenue: US$ MM $12.1 $16.0 $13.1 $12.9 $12.9
CAD$ MM $16.1 $21.4 $17.5 $17.2 $17.2
Based on IRC’s Qualifying Report: 0.7500 CAD$:US$ Exchange rate: US$5.00 / lb Ni in 2006-2007, 2008 forward: $4.00 / lb NiFirst Quarter 2006 first royalty received
Voisey’s Bay Net Revenue - Sensitivities to Exchange Rates and Nickel prices2006 Ni Price (US$/lb) 2007 Ni Price (US$/lb)
(US$/C$) $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 (US$/C$) $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00Revenues (C$M) Revenues (C$M)
0.75 $13.19 $16.14 $19.10 $22.05 0.75 $17.47 $21.40 $25.32 $29.240.80 $12.36 $15.13 $17.90 $20.67 0.80 $16.38 $20.06 $23.74 $27.420.85 $11.64 $14.24 $16.85 $19.45 0.85 $15.42 $18.88 $22.34 $25.800.90 $10.99 $13.45 $15.91 $18.37 0.90 $14.56 $17.83 $21.10 $24.37
11
Voisey’s Bay Royalty Purchase Terms
Acquired 100% of Archean ResourcesArchean Resources indirectly holds a 2.70% NSR
CAD$185 million purchase price consisting of:– $152.5 million in cash to Chislett and Verbiski– $27.5 million in IRC shares at IPO price to Verbiski– 1.0 million IRC shares to Verbiski– 2 Board Seats (C. Daly, C. Seviour)– Additional CAD$40 MM if Labrador Mineral Tax is
repealed (low probability)
12
Voisey’s Bay Upside
• Phase I - 30 MM tonnes of Reserves• Additional 54 MM tonnes of Measured and
Indicated Resources• Additional 16 MM tonnes of Inferred
Resources• NSR covers all future Inco mines in Labrador• Possible economic benefits to IRC from
Hydromet technology• Significant economic driver for Labrador
13
Experience, Management, BoardManagementDouglas Silver,. B.A., M.S. CGA, FAusIMM (CP)
CEO, Chairman, Director: 25 years mining valuation experienceAnaconda, Bond Int. Gold, Pincock, Allen & Holt, Balfour Holdings, Inc.
Douglas Hurst, B.Sc. President, Director: 20 years, mining analyst Canadian market specialist, Sprott, McDermid
George Young, B.S., LLB Vice President, Director: 25 years, lawyer, corporate builderGetty Minerals, Bond Int. Gold, MAG Silver
Ray Jenner, B.Sc., B.Comm., C.A. CFO: 20 years, domestic and international finance, natural resource industryEcho Bay Mines Ltd., Nord Resources Corp, Lextron Inc
David Hammond, B.S, M.S., MBA, PhDInterim CFO: 30 years, PhD mineral economistARCO, Anaconda, Ladd Petroleum, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Denver University
Board of DirectorsRene Carrier Businessman / compliance expertise Chris Daly CFO Archean / accountantGord Fretwell Canadian securities lawyerRobert Schafer Global exploration / business development expertiseColm Seviour Mining lawyerEd Mercaldo Businessman
14
IRC’S Royalty PortfolioMultiple commodities with a strong
North American gold emphasis
Distribution of IRC Royalties by Commodity
Other
Gold
ZincCopper
SilverDiamonds
Coal
N = 62
Distribution of IRC Royalties by Geographic Area
Other
Canada
United States
Latin America
Australia
N = 62
*IRC closed a transaction in escrow with a vendor, David Fawcett, on February 22, 2005 with respect to the acquisition of this royalty. On March 21, 2005 Western Canadian Coal Corp. filed a petition in the Supreme Court of British Columbia challenging the validity of the royalty granted to Mr. Fawcett. Proceedings are ongoing.
15
Review of other potential IRC RoyaltiesWilliams (Hemlo) Gold Royalty
Williams – David Bell is the largest gold mine in Canada
Williams mine• 0.25% NSR• Open pit / underground mining• Teck Cominco / Barrick operator• CAD$ 500,000 / year IRC NSR• 10+ years remaining mine life• 2.7 million ounces Reserves1
• 1.5 million ounces Resources1
• Cash Costs of US$226/Oz1
1Teck Comincowww.teckcominco.com
16
Review of other IRC RoyaltiesB.C. Coal Royalties
• 5 royalties• 0.203% Free on Board
(“FOB”) royalty at port• Western Canadian Coal is
operator• Long-term off-take
contract for Perry Creek• Anticipated 2006
commissioning• 49.30 MM tonnes Resources• 1,600,000 tonnes per year
www.westerncoal.com
*IRC closed a transaction in escrow with a vendor, David Fawcett, on February 22, 2005 with respect to the acquisition of this royalty. On March 21, 2005 Western Canadian Coal Corp. filed a petition in the Supreme Court of British Columbia challenging the validity of the royalty granted to Mr. Fawcett. Proceedings are ongoing.
17
Review of other IRC royaltiesFeasibility-stage royalties
Property Royalty Operator
Belahouro, Burkina Faso 2.5% NSR Goldbelt Res.
Caber, Canada 1.0% NSR Metco Res.
Hasbrouck, USA 1.5% NSR Vista Gold
Kubi Village, Ghana 3.0% NPI AngloGold
Mara Rosa, Brazil 1.0% NSR Amarillo Gold
Soledad Mtn, USA Capped Sliding NSR
Golden Queen
Ulu, Canada 5.0% NSR Wolfden Res.
18
Review of other IRC RoyaltiesExploration Royalties
• Total royalties encompass 23+ million acres• Multiple commodities and geography• Royalties on
~5.9 million ounces Gold Reserves~7.3 million ounces Measured and Indicated Gold
Resources~3.9 million ounces Inferred Gold Resources
• Portfolio effect: one discovery could pay for the entire portfolio many times over
19
Arctic diamond lands• Churchill Project• 1.0% GOR• 22 Kimberlite Pipes
Identified• Operator
- Shear Minerals- Stornoway Diamonds- BHP Billiton
• 7,900,000 acres
• Aviat Project• Operator
- Stornoway Diamonds- BHP Billiton
1.0% GOR6 Diamondiferous Pipes
www.shearminerals.com
20
Pinson gold, NevadaAtna Resources – Operator Barrick retains 70% back-in right
www.atna.com
*Royalty covers a portion of the property
21
IRC will receive the benefit of CAD$43 MM in exploration spending by others
2003 2004Company Spent By Others on
Expenditures IRC Royalty PropertiesCAD$ MM CAD$ MM
Newmont1 $203Rio Tinto2 $182BHP Billiton3 $159DeBeers $126Placer Dome $106Barrick Gold $ 87AngloGold $ 56Noranda1 $ 51International Royalty Corporation $ 0 $43+
Gold Fields $ 39INCO $ 38TeckCominco $ 30
1 Includes exploration, research and development costs References: corporate annual reports, press releases, websites AIFs2 Includes exploration and evaluation costs Uses 2003 annual CAD$/US$ exchange rate of 0.71583 Fiscal year ending June 2004
22
Most of IRC’s Royalties are Operated by Public Companies
• ~90% controlled and operated by public companies
• Lots of public information forthcoming - Free momentum
• IRC serves as an investment proxy for junior operators
• Royalties are attached to the property and not the owner
• Each acquisition can establish a perpetual position at no additional cost
23
IRC business model• Buy or create royalties
Voisey’s Bay 2.7% NSR forms the cornerstone asset
18 month track record: 62 royalties with terms agreed or acquired so far…
• Proprietary database has targeted >2,000 royalties worldwide
• Several large royalties targeted for post-IPO
• Move quickly while there are few competitors
• Accumulate strong cash position for possible downturn
• Preserve high-margin business by growing revenues and maintaining low G&A
24
References: Franco-Nevada public disclosures; Canada Stockwatch for share prices
Goldstrike Expansion commissioned
Acquisition of Voisey’s Bay royalty gives IRC a head start
25
• Market cap CAD$244.24 M• FD Market cap CAD$264.88 M• FD Market cap* US$217.73 M• LT Debt** US$24.3 M
• Share Price (at IPO) CAD$4.30• Shares Out 57.0M• Fully Diluted 61.9M• Options 2.95M
Cap Structure & Ownership
*Assumes exchange rate of CAD$1 to $US0.822**CAD$30M debentures issued, based upon exchange rate on the date of closing *** As of 4/6/05
Major ShareholdersChris Verbiski – 13% Management – 7%
Share Capitalization
20.93% - 9.70M shares
16.83% - 7.80M shares
56.09% - 26.0M shares
6.15% - 2.85M shares
Existing ShareholdersIPO SharesAcquisition SharesOptions
***
26
Initial Public Offering(CAD$ Millions Estimates)
Sources of FundsCAD$162.5 Equity
CAD$30.0 Debentures
CAD$192.5 Total
Uses of FundsCAD$152.5 Archean Acquisition
CAD$2.0 Other Acquisitions
CAD$1.8 Interest Coverage
CAD$13.7 Issue costs
CAD$22.5 Working Capital
CAD$192.5 Total
27
Terms of the Offering• Issue: 37.791 MM Common Shares• Issue Price: CAD$4.30 per Common Share• Amount Raised: CAD$162,500,000• Use of Proceeds: Acquisition of Voisey’s Bay NSR, other
royalty portfolios, working capital and general corporate purposes
• Jurisdictions: Canada (Prospectus), USA (Rule 506 of Regulation D), and Overseas (Applicable Exemptions)
• Closed: February 22nd, 2005
• IRC is expected to be a PFIC under U.S. tax regulations
28
Terms of the Debenture• Offering: Private placement secured debenture• Issue Amount: CAD$ 30,000,000• Coupon: 5.5%• Interest: First 18 months interest escrowed• Equity Component: 20% of principal at IPO price• Call Feature: Company has right to call after IPO• Principal Repayment: Not due until after Voisey’s Bay begins production.• Term: 6 Years• Use of Proceeds: Acquisition of Voisey’s Bay NSR, other
royalty portfolios, working capital and general corporate purposes
• Closed: February 22nd, 2005
29
•Higher margins correlate to higher multiples•Significantly lower operating risk and exploration upside further justify premium valuations
*EBITDA Margin figures based on most recent annual report. IRC and Silver Wheaton based on 2006 and 2005 estimates respectively
**EV/EBITDA Multiples based on Haywood and GMP estimates
Comparison of EBITDA Margin vs. EV/EBITDA Multiple
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
SilverWheaton
IRC Goldcorp WheatonRiver
Lionore Glamis Teck Noranda
EB
ITD
A M
argi
n
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.012.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
EV
/EB
ITD
A M
ultip
le
EBITDA Margin EV/EBITDA
Royalty Companies are High Margin Businesses
30
Current Comparable Valuation
Haywood prepared slide.
At the offering price, IRC is inexpensive relative to existing royalty companies
Share Market Total Revenue EBITDA EV/ EV/Price Cap Cash Debt EV (US$M) (US$M) Revenue EBITDA
Company (C$) (US$M) (US$M) (US$M) (US$M) 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006Silver Wheaton $3.43 $469.2 $18.2 $0.0 $450.9 $28.7 $23.6 $27.4 $22.3 15.8x 19.2x 16.6x 20.3xRoyal Gold Inc. $20.12 $353.5 $46.2 $0.0 $307.3 $22.9 n/a n/a n/a 13.3x n/a n/a n/a
Average 14.6x 19.2x 16.6x 20.3xshares out FD $43.5 $213.1
IRC 2006 @ US$7/lb Ni $6.00 $213.1 $12.2 $24.5 $225.3 nm $17.5 nm $15.9 nm 12.9x nm 14.2xIRC 2006 @ US$6/lb Ni $6.00 $213.1 $12.2 $24.5 $225.3 nm $15.3 nm $13.6 nm 14.8x nm 16.5xIRC 2006 @ US$5/lb Ni $6.00 $213.1 $12.2 $24.5 $225.3 nm $13.1 nm $11.4 nm 17.3x nm 19.7x
$43.5IRC 2007 @ US$7/lb Ni $6.00 $213.1 $12.2 $24.5 $225.3 nm $22.9 nm $21.3 nm 9.8x nm 10.6xIRC 2007 @ US$6/lb Ni $6.00 $213.1 $12.2 $24.5 $225.3 nm $20.0 nm $18.3 nm 11.3x nm 12.3xIRC 2007 @ US$5/lb Ni $6.00 $213.1 $12.2 $24.5 $225.3 nm $17.0 nm $15.4 nm 13.2x nm 14.6xSources: Silver Wheaton and Royal Gold public disclosure, Haywood Research estimates, National Bank Financial Research report Nov. 4, 2004 US$/C$ exchange rate = 0.82
31
Historical Valuation ComparisonRelative to the historical revenue and EBITDA multiples, IRC would be priced at a significant discount based on 2006 and 2007 revenue and EBITDA
Haywood prepared slide.
97-98 IRCRevenue Avg Avg US$7/lb Ni US$6/lb Ni US$5/lb Ni
Company 1998 1997 1996 1995 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007Euro Nevada 29.5x 27.3x 19.5x 17.6x 23.5x 28.4x 12.9x 9.8x 14.8x 11.3x 17.3x 13.2xFranco Nevada 36.4x 30.6x 21.5x 18.5x 26.7x 33.5x 12.9x 9.8x 14.8x 11.3x 17.3x 13.2x
97-98 IRCEBITDA Avg Avg US$7/lb Ni US$6/lb Ni US$5/lb Ni
Company 1998 1997 1996 1995 2006 2007 2006 2007 2006 2007Euro Nevada 31.9x 29.2x 21.0x 19.3x 25.4x 30.5x 14.2x 10.6x 16.5x 12.3x 19.7x 14.6xFranco Nevada 38.1x 31.8x 22.3x 19.1x 27.8x 35.0x 14.2x 10.6x 16.5x 12.3x 19.7x 14.6xSource: Euro Nevada and Franco Nevada public disclosure, IRC, and Bloomberg
EV/
EV/
32
Summary• Voisey’s Bay: long-term, low cost• Provides cash for future growth• Database of > 2,000 royalties• High revenues & low costs = High margin business• Strong management; uniquely qualified• Royalties are a better way to invest in commodities• Exposure to commodity prices, exploration
discovery and strong cash flow without the risk of varying capital and operating costs