building collaborative partnerships ontario library association february 3, 2012 presented by: anne...
TRANSCRIPT
Ontario Library Association
February 3, 2012
Presented by:
Anne Ramsay
Project READ Literacy Network
Waterloo-Wellington
Laura Dick
Kitchener Public Library
By the end of this presentation, participants will:
• Be aware of the structure and process of partnership building
• Be aware of literacy – library connections
• Understand possible partnership opportunities in their community
Where are you on the partnership continuum?
Partner Newbie
Partner ProPartner in
Training
PartnerPartner - n. one who shares or takes part with another or others, esp. in a business firm with shared risks and profits; somebody who takes part in an activity or undertaking with somebody else; companion in dancing.
Source: Oxford Dictionary and Microsoft Dictionary
Trust Building!Trust Building!
In a public service context, Kernaghan (1993) defines partnership as:
“... a relationship involving the sharing of power, work, support and/or information with others for the achievement of joint goals and/or mutual benefits.”
- ADAPT Initiative, Ireland
Collaborate
Participate & Cooperate
Coordinate/Contribute
Consult/Network
1. Decision-making
2. Degree of Risk
3. Responsibility
4. Communication
High
Low
1. Types of partnerships you have been involved in.
2. What new partnerships to you anticipate?
Accomplish more collectively with limited resources individually
Brings clarity to goals & outcomes
Opportunity for variety of perspectives
Increase power & influence through alliances
Raise profile, strengthen ownership & commitment to cause or issue
Enhances communication capacity
I’m too busy.
What’s in it for us?I’ve been told to attend.
We can’t commit any resources.
I don’t trust them.
What are the risks?We’re not ready.
I don’t have the skills.
Common
Unique
Consultative or Advisory
Contributory
Operational
Collaborative
Shared Problem Solving
Issue Awareness / Promotion
Event, Project or Program Delivery
Clearly identify your purpose for partnering.
Collaborative leaders should:
Be inclusive, promote diversity
Practice shared decision making
Resolve conflicts constructively
Communicate clearly, openly, & honestly
Facilitate group interaction
Nurture leadership in other & encourage commitment
- W.K. Kellogg Foundation
Partnership Development Cycle*
#1 Identify - Who? Likely candidates,stakeholders,
key players
#3 Partnership Structure - What?
Continuum formal - informal
#4 Review & Evaluation - So What?
Effectiveness, costs, impacts
#2 Connection Strategies - How?
Entry points, doorways, access
Maintenance
*Kennedy & Ramsay, March 2005
Who are likely suspects?
Research potential partners - mission, philosophy, services, programs
Commonalities & differences - connection or competition
Complementary services, resources & programs
Present informal relationships & personal connections
Past experiences &/or examples from other communities
Tentative informal meetings to “test the waters”
Core Partner
s
Specific Involvement
Resource Support Peripheral
Cold Calls, Warm Calls or emails
Information Packages or Letters
Exploratory meetings with key staff members &/or board
Networked introductions - get names of key people
Bandwagon calls - connect based on newly announced initiative or mandate
Build rapport & communication
Trust is the key element of any partnership or collaboration.
Trust comes from familiarity, rapport and shared values and philosophy.
INFORMAL FORMAL
1. Decision-making
2. Degree of Risk
3. Responsibilities
4. Communication
Continuum
Informal
Formal
Personal contact & relationship
Ongoing, periodic
Minimal decision making
Flexible links
Minimal resources
Designated representatives
Identified timeline
Formalized decision-making
Defined roles
Committed resources
Informal
Formal
Giving/sharing information
Activity as needed, periodic
Varies with need
Relationship-based
Clear vision, goals & outcomes
Regular activity
Designated tasks
Results-based
Defined expectations
Evaluation in place
Informal
Formal
Infrequent, casual
Varies with need
Verbal &/or email
Minimal expectations
Little conflict
Regular, scheduled
Documented
Highly developed
Has a clear purpose & expectations
Conflict resolution
Emails
Minutes of Meetings
Decisions Made & By Whom
Action Plans & Outcome Statements
Expectations & Goals
Resource Commitments
Memo of Understanding
Impacts - positive/negative
Raising of public profile
Resources used & costs incurred - staff time, materials, etc.
Potential for maintaining &/or deepening the connection
Potential ROI - return on investment or future pay-offs
Evaluate the partnership process & the products
Evaluation Approaches -
• Formative - during the process
• Summative - final collation of all results
• Quantitative - numbers, volume
• Qualitative - impacts, quality of life
Outside or internal evaluator or combo?
360 Evaluation - ask everyone involved
Adult Literacy• Core Programs• Projects
•Ministry of Training, Colleges & Universities•Office of Literacy & Essential Skills
Family Literacy•core programs•Projects
Lack of consistent source
Let’s Read
Get Set Learn Afterschool
Enhancing Pathways
Board of Directors
Community Partners
Adult Literacy representation
Multigenerational Impact
Fee for Service
Advisory/Curriculum Committees
Library staff facilitate portion of program
Committee/consulting work
Staff expertise
Networking opportunities
Networking opportunities
Funding opportunities
Knowledge building opportunities
Thank you!
Partnering is a trust building process
Be strategic & look for common ground
Document & communicate
Be a good partner & they’ll come to you!