building health center capacity for research and quality development framing discussion and morning...
TRANSCRIPT
Building Health Center Capacity for Research and Quality Development
Framing Discussion and Morning WorkshopThe Difference Between QI and Research and
Applying What We Learned
August 22, 2013Chicago, IL.
Joan PerniceKaren Hacker
Quality in Primary Care
•“The extent to which health services provided to individuals and patient populations improve desired health outcomes. The care should be based on the
strongest clinical evidence and provided in a technically and culturally competent manner with
good communication and shared decision making. “
• As defined by the Institute of Medicine (IOM)
Page 2
What is Integrated Quality?Health Center Mission
Strategic Organizational Goals
Quality Improvement Plan
Annual GoalsAnnual Work Plan
Process Improvement EffortsCommunication
Evaluation
Page 3
Quality Improvement is Everyone’s Business!
Page 4
CHC Board
CEO/Executive Director
CMO/Medical Director
Quality Coordinator
Quality Committee
Department Heads/Directors All StaffChief Operating
Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Dental Director
Director of Behavioral Health
Linked aims of improvement
Batalden P B , and Davidoff F Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:2-3
Copyright © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
Page 5
Quality Improvement Premises
• There are gaps between knowledge and practice• There are large variations in practices• “Best practices” exist all over the world• All improvement requires change, but not all
change leads to improvement• Every system is perfectly designed to achieve the
results it achieves• We can learn a lot more working together than we
can working separately
6
Our Focus: How to Enable CHC Culture to be the Best Possible
Performance Improvement
Training
Quality and Process
Improvement Strategies
Patient-Centered
Medical Home Transformation
How do we best leverage the integration of all three forces?
Page 7
A Performance Improvement Model
Page 8
Effective PI
Program
Leadership Commitmen
t to PIClear Vision
of PI
Rigorous Project
Selection
Measureable Results
Operational Accountabili
ty
Project Managemen
t Skills
Sustainability and
Change Managemen
t
Current Framework
Page 9
1. Meeting with Leadership
Team
2. Senior Leadership
Training
3. Essentials of Leadership Excellence
4. PIPD
Coachinga. Define
b. Measure/ Analyze
c. Improve
d. Sustain
e. Report Out
Create the Improvement DNAPerformance Improvement Practitioner Development (PIPD) Program
Define Measure /Analyze Improve Sustain
•Create project charter
•Complete stakeholder analysis
•Communication
•Create & validate process map
•Collect & analyze•Root cause analysis
•Communication
•Brainstorm & select improvements
•Test improvements
•Collect results•Implement improvements
•Communication
•Create sustain plan
•Develop run chart
•Communication
10
What is Lean? a set of operational concepts a set of tools used in a
variety of industries – including service & healthcare – to improve business processes
a philosophy that helps drive efficiency through employee empowerment and change at the grass roots
Page 11
Jidok
a
Just
-in-T
ime
Standardization
Customer Focus
Continuous Improvement
Create standards for all key processes
Follow standard first, then continuously improve
Go & seeAsk “why” 5 times
Demand root cause action
Don’t accept, make or pass defects
Stop and surface the problem
Standardize
Solve
Cannot recognize defects if standards are not defined
Preventabnormalitiesfrom becoming the standard
The Underlying Principles
Page 12
The PDSA Cyclefor Learning and Improvement
13
PlanAct
DoStudy
- Objective- Questions and predictions (Why?)- Plan to carry out the cycle(who, what, where, when)
- Carry out the plan- Document problems and unexpected observations- Begin analysis of the data
- Complete the analysis of the data - Compare data to predictions - Summarize what was learned
- What changes are to be made?
- Next cycle?
Lean Concepts for Improving Processes
1. Remove process waste2. Standardize the process3. Implement visual management4. Level load the process5. Improve the process to be “Just in Time”6. Build quality into the process
Page 14
Staffing: Acquiring/placing talent
Development: Building competence/capability
Measures: Tracking performance
Rewards: Recognizing/rewarding desired behavior
Communication:
Using information to build and sustain momentum
Organization Design:
Organizing to support the change initiative
IT Systems: Utilizing IT technology to enable changes to be successful and sustained
Resource Allocation:
Adjusting or planning for financial and other resources to support the change project
Factors to Consider
15
Key Learning and Future Work Key learning from this work:• Develop process maps of
existing workflows before implementing change
• Communicate need for change, create buy-in, solicit input, engage stakeholders
• Change process: pilot small changes, document new workflows, communicate changes and train staff. Don’t short change the training process – ask the users to help develop training documents.
• Communication about practice redesign should be ongoing and through multiple channels (emails, posters, meetings)
• Develop a plan to ensure follow-through and foster accountability
Plans for future improvements:• Review, revise and document
improved workflows for all visit types using process maps
• Continue to explore ways to standardize workflows by maximizing EMR functionality
• Family Medicine’s lean initiative is part of the health center’s overall practice redesign efforts
16
Defining Research
• A systematic investigation, including development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.
• Activities that meet this definition may be – funded or unfunded– may be conducted as a component of another program
not usually considered research.
Quality improvement versus research?
Quality Improvement
Classical Research
Primary Goal Local improvement in process or outcome
Generalizable knowledge
Context Embraces context Attempts to eliminate effect of context
Cycle time Rapid tests of change Longer data collection, definitive results
Data analysis More visual, level of certainty implicit
Statistical, explicit
Towards building a learning health care system
• Vision of the IOM Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care– . …a learning healthcare system designed to
generate and apply the best evidence for the collaborative health care choices of each patient and clinician; to drive the process of discovery as a natural outgrowth of patient care; and to ensure innovation, quality, safety, and value in health care
Institute of Medicine Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care Charter And VisionStatement. Retrieved August 25th, 2011 from www.iom.edu/~/media/RT%203pgr11_09.ashx
Why engage in research in health centers?
• To provide the best possible care to patients • To facilitate recruitment and retention of primary
care providers• To makes a health center more appealing to medical
school/residency programs• To bring in financial resources to the health center• To facilitate more efficient use of resources
Research in Community Health Centers http://www.aapcho.dreamhosters.com/download/PDF/Fried_ResearchInCHCs.pdf
Unwinding the scientific method:creating new knowledge
• We come to understand things by observing the world in structured ways.
• We develop hypotheses, test them, and (if we’re not ideologically constrained) revise them.
• Sometimes, we intervene and then observe.• We can be fooled by jumping to conclusions: chance,
bias, and confounding.
Bias
Chance
Confounding
Generalizability
Association
Causation
?
?
Threats to what we think we “know”?
Internal Validity
External Validity
Human subjects research
• Research involving human beings in any capacity• Encompasses everything beyond basic science
– translational research (bench to bedside)– clinical trials of preventive and therapeutic strategies– epidemiology, behavioral research, health services and
outcomes research– observational research
• Requires Institutional Review Board Approval (human subjects protection)
Steps in initiating research
• What’s the question?• Does it involve human subjects?• What’s the design?• What are the resources needed?• What is your health center capacity to
conduct?• Who are the partners and what skills do they
bring?
Determining design?
Classical research hierarchy:Case reportsCase seriesCase control studiesCohort studiesNon-randomized intervention trialsRandomized controlled trials
Based only on internal validity! Your best design?…
Ad
van
cin
g R
igo
r
Different designs for different questions
• Ramdomized Trial• Evaluating new treatments
• Cohort Study• Prognosis of patients with specific conditions
• Case-Control Study• Evaluating risk associated with environmental
exposures when outcomes are rare• Cross Sectional Study
• Assessing the accuracy of a diagnostic test• Qualitative Research
• Descriptive and hypothesis generating
Sampling Considerations1. • Comparison Group-is one available?• Bias-how representative is the group of the
group being studied?• Size-are the numbers large enough to assess
outcome of interest?• Is recruitment feasible?
Based only on internal validity! Your best design?…
Types of research at Community Health Centers
• Comparative Effectiveness• Health Services• Community Based Participatory Research
Comparative effectiveness
• Patients to the research community: “What have you done for me lately”… – Focus on direct relevance to shared choices– Comparison to real alternatives– Patient-centered outcomes (PCORI)– Use of both interventional (but more pragmatic) and
observational designs
Health services research
• Study of systems for delivering care, including variation, access to care, quality of care.
• Study of strategies of care (quality) improvement, guideline implementation, and other health policy changes.
• Study of the health system as a whole, including health insurance, managed care, health care workforce.
• Study health at the level of the population.
“ A partnership approach to research that equitably involves community members, organizational representatives, and researchers in all aspects of the research project.”
- Israel, et al., 2001
Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR)