building information modeling - siia bimf2.pdfbut those beautiful 3d renderings are only the tip of...
TRANSCRIPT
fermag.com JUNE 2016 53
A decade ago, the world of architecture, engineer-
ing and construction buzzed with talk about building infor-
mation modeling, a concept that had been around in both
name and theory decades before that. The buzz was loud
enough that the foodservice industry even paid attention.
Like the first mention of BIM, however, the practical appli-
cation of the concept in foodservice was ahead of its time.
“One of the earliest documented uses of the term ‘build-
ing modeling’ in the sense that BIM is used today appeared
in the title of a 1986 paper by Robert Aish,” says Ilia Terzi,
CAD Department, Specifi LLC, Venice, Italy. “Aish illus-
trated BIM technology concepts in a case study applying
BIM to the phased refurbishment of Terminal 3 at Heath-
row Airport in London.”
Since that time, BIM has been touted as the wave of the
By
Mic
hae
l S
her
er, S
enio
r C
ontr
ibu
tin
g E
dit
or
Talked about for years, the promise of building information modeling (BIM) is finally coming to pass. If you’re not specifying it in your RFPs, you should be.
BUILDINGINFORMATIONMODELING
54 JUNE 2016 fermag.com fermag.com JUNE 2016 55
future in building
design and con-
struction, an almost
magical way of
assembling the tra-
ditional documents
required to permit
and construct a
building through 3D
visualization instead
of traditional 2D
drawings. And over
time, the concept’s
practical applica-
tions have expanded
and grown sophis-
ticated enough that governments around the
world, including the U.S., U.K., Singapore and
South Korea, now require building architects
and contractors to use the technique for all
government projects. Australia and several EU
countries will make it mandatory in 2018.
But foodservice projects, which seemed a
natural fi t for the concept, were slow to follow
the trend. Consultants and designers found the
software necessary to implement BIM cumber-
some and expensive, equipment manufacturers
hadn’t made their information available in the
right format, and operators
didn’t see the benefi ts.
All Sizzle, No SteakBIM, in its simplest defi nition,
is the digital representation of
the physical and functional
characteristics of a building.
But it’s also a way of working,
a process that uses information
and technology to create value.
“Imagine it this way,” says
Ted Doyals, FCSI, Principal
with Ricca Design Studios,
Oklahoma City. “We used
to draft plans by hand, both
fl oorplans and elevations, that contractors used
for permits and construction. Any time someone
made a change, we had to redraw the plans.
We moved from that to CAD, which allowed
us to put dumb blocks on plans that stood for
objects like kitchen equipment. As time went
on, AutoCAD allowed us to add some informa-
tion to those blocks. Now software lets us add
information like electric loads, water lines and
pressure and much more, and when an archi-
tect or draftsperson changes the drawings, the
information in the software is automatically and
universally updated to refl ect that.”
Adding information to the building blocks in
the software—blocks that represent walls, fl oors,
doors, windows and objects—enabled architects
and designers to draw plans faster and with
more detail. And software programs like Auto-
CAD enabled them to create those plans in 3D
drawings, giving contractors and owners a better
idea of what fi nished projects would look like.
When even more sophisticated software
programs like Revit came on line, they accepted
and manipulated so much information about
the products and materials used to fabricate
all those “blocks” that the 3D drawings could
actually be viewed as renderings of the fi nished
product. And the renderings were so lifelike
that often people equated BIM with 3D.
But those beautiful 3D renderings are only the
tip of the iceberg; the sizzle, not the steak. Proj-
ects were sold on that basis, and clients didn’t
get the real benefi ts of BIM. The real meat of
BIM is its next levels—4D (Time), 5D (Cost) and
6D (Lifecycle)—which we’ll get to in a moment.
While the AEC community worked on truly
incorporating BIM into projects, the foodservice
industry was slow to adopt the concept. Several
factors contributed to the industry’s reluctance.
First, Revit and other software pro-
grams that could implement the BIM ap-
proach had no category for foodservice
equipment as they did for other parts
of a building. The few brave souls who
did incorporate BIM into foodservice
projects had to create from scratch the
parameters that described each piece of
equipment they specifi ed in their plans.
NAFEM, FCSI and FEDA collaborated to
create standards for foodservice equip-
ment and released them in ’11, but few
manufacturers had developed the infor-
mation that consultants and designers
needed to easily include the manufactur-
ers’ equipment in plans and renderings.
And few consultants or operators
embraced the shift from Auto-
CAD to programs like Revit.
“Going from AutoCAD to Re-
vit for most people is like the
shift from drafting on paper to
CAD,” Doyals says. Not only
were the programs complex
and diffi cult to learn, but mak-
ing the shift meant a substan-
tial investment in hardware,
software and training.
What’s Changed “A lot of people also were frustrated by Revit
when BIM fi rst started taking off in ’07 or ’08 be-
cause it didn’t allow a lot of freedom,” says Ben
Guler, Senior Project Manager and BIM Manager
for Chipman Design Architecture, Des Plaines,
Ill. “And Revit updates weren’t backwards
compatible with previous versions, which
meant that there could be errors in data that was
transferred from one version to another.”
Adding to the confusion are multiple versions
of Revit standards. “There are currently four dif-
ferent standards for Revit,” says Terzi. “It would
be great if there was one worldwide standard;
that would solve a variety of the problems
right format, and operators
didn’t see the benefi ts.
All Sizzle, No SteakBIM, in its simplest defi nition,
is the digital representation of
the physical and functional
characteristics of a building.
But it’s also a way of working,
a process that uses information
and technology to create value.
“Imagine it this way,” says
Ted Doyals, FCSI, Principal
with Ricca Design Studios,
Oklahoma City. “We used
to draft plans by hand, both
A rendering in Revit
(above) and AutoCAD
(r.). Revit is the more
advanced genera-
tion of BIM-compliant
software and thanks to
its intelligent objects,
which are imbued with
robust information, it
is possible to create in
Revit the foodservice
equipment’s electrical
circuits, plumbing and
ventilation systems,
embed warranty and
lifecycle information,
and much more.
Courtesy of Specifi .
BIM renderings can
be incredibly realistic,
which provides clients
with a true picture of
what their design will
look like, even to the
lighting effects, and
allows for changes
and corrections early
in the design process.
Courtesy of Chipman
Design Architecture.
3D renderings are
only the tip of the
iceberg; the sizzle,
not the steak. The
real meat of BIM
is its next levels—
4D (Time), 5D (Cost)
and 6D (Lifecycle).
manufacturers and content
creators are encountering
when creating models. For
instance, many countries
are non-English speaking
and can’t use English as
default language for parameters and product
descriptions. Besides, all around the world,
there are endless lists of standards for electrical,
plumbing and HVAC disciplines. Manufacturers
should be able to provide foodservice content
for all countries and regions. That’s why we
need one global standard which includes all
the rules and parameters to accommodate all
markets.”
Specifi is working in an advisory fashion
with the Foodservice Consultants Society Int’l.
(FCSI), Catering Equipment Suppliers As-
sociation (CESA) and European Federation of
Catering Equipment Manufacturers (EFCEM) to
develop a standard for the industry, which will
be a collaborative effort driven by the trade
associations.
The steady march of technology, however,
has made it much easier for anyone—consul-
tants, operators, equipment dealers—to get into
the game. Hardware costs have come down at
the same time computing power has risen, so a
decent laptop can now do the job (though most
kitchen designers will want desktops with large
HD monitors). And software can do even more,
but is easier to use than earlier versions.
“Increased processing power has enabled us
to do a lot of things we couldn’t do 10 years
ago,” says Mike Hnatschenko, AIA, Director of
Strategic Solutions at WD Partners, Minneapo-
lis. “And now cloud applications let us share
and access information. That’s led to even more
applications and tools that can use information
associated with each piece of a project, whether
it be a window, fl oor material or piece of food-
service equipment.”
Manufacturers, especially large multi-category
companies like Manitowoc, Ali Group, Electro-
lux, Halton, Alto-Shaam,
Hobart and Middleby, have
gotten on the bandwagon
and made information on
their products available
in standard NAFEM/FCSI
format for BIM. And compa-
nies like Specifi have devel-
oped software especially for
the industry, making it even
easier to develop foodser-
vice projects with BIM.
So what’s all the fuss
about anyway? Why should
you be designing projects
or asking your providers
to design projects in BIM?
What’s wrong with draft-
ing plans with AutoCAD or
something similar? After all,
you can create elevations in
these programs, too.
“The ability to visualize a proj-
ect is the aspect of BIM that people
fi rst jumped on,” says Hnatschenko,
“but now coordination and project
management are what people are
most interested in. With BIM, you’re
not just placing equipment items on
a fl oorplan. You’re looking at how
they’ll be used, so data being added to
these virtual models includes things
like power hookups and usage, labor
needed to operate the equipment,
maintenance required to keep it in
warranty and so forth. BIM takes proj-
ects beyond construction into opera-
tions and facilities management.”
Next Level UpBefore we get too far ahead of our-
selves, let’s get back to basics. Using a
BIM approach to design projects saves
time and money. Simple as that.
“The biggest advantage to using
BIM is that you start with a fully coordinated
virtual model,” says Guler. “Consultants don’t
spend as much time drawing, which saves time
and money. And you can customize tools to
your or your client’s needs—generating a materi-
als list, for example, based on a specifi c project.
With a coordinated model there aren’t as many
RFIs [requests for information], and you end
up with a better set of drawings, which lowers
construction costs.”
To help ease the migration to BIM from manu-
al drafting or CAD, groups in the AEC industries
in different countries developed defi nitions for
“levels of detail” through which a BIM ele-
ment—fl oor, wall or piece of foodservice equip-
ment—can logically progress. In the U.S., it was
determined that fi ve levels were suffi cient: 100,
a conceptual approximation; 200, approximate
geometry of the item; 300, precise geometry of
the element; 400, fabrication details; and 500, as
it’s actually built.
Let’s say you’re designing ductwork for a
kitchen ventilation hood. In level 100, the run
isn’t modeled. Cost and other information,
though, can be included as an amount per sq.
ft. of fl oor area. In level 200, drawings would
include a 3D duct with approximate dimen-
sions. Level 300 details would include precise
engineered dimensions in the 3D model. Fabri-
cation details would be added in level 400, and
in level 500 the model would include a 3D rep-
resentation of the installed duct. Other details
that might be included at that level are things
like static pressure, airfl ow cfm rates, cleaning
and maintenance schedules, and even warranty
information.
A couple of things are important about these
levels of detail. The more information, the easier
it is to spot problems. And when a problem is
corrected and a change made on the model,
software automatically changes anything that’s
affected by that change.
56 JUNE 2016 fermag.com fermag.com JUNE 2016 57
lux, Halton, Alto-Shaam,
Hobart and Middleby, have
gotten on the bandwagon
and made information on
their products available
in standard NAFEM/FCSI
format for BIM. And compa-
nies like Specifi have devel-
oped software especially for
the industry, making it even
easier to develop foodser-
vice projects with BIM.
So what’s all the fuss
about anyway? Why should
you be designing projects
or asking your providers
to design projects in BIM?
What’s wrong with draft-
ing plans with AutoCAD or
something similar? After all,
you can create elevations in
these programs, too.
NBS, which offers
specifi cation and in-
formation solutions to
construction industry
professionals, created
a Periodic Table of BIM
that does a nice job of
identifying the myriad
resources and tools
BIM programs provide.
Thenbs.com
Ricca Design Studios
used Revit for The
Ohio State University
Boyd Hall project. The
fi rm estimates that
designing in Revit
reduces production
time by a minimum
5% from a traditional
AutoCAD up front, but
that the real savings
is in error elimination,
identifying issues be-
fore a brick is laid.
It’s probably easier to
learn to use software
than to learn the
[foodservice] industry.
58 JUNE 2016 fermag.com fermag.com JUNE 2016 59
BIM System RequirementsYou may need more processing power than you presently have to run
BIM software effi ciently. Fortunately, costs for hardware have come down
substantially in recent years. Here’s what you’ll need:
CPU: 64-bit quad-core processor.
RAM: 8 GB (16 GB recommended.)
Operating System: Windows 8
Display Resolution: 1024x768 (1600x1050 recommended with True Color)
Video Card: DirectX 11 capable graphics.
Video Memory: 128 MB VRAM or greater.
Disk Space: 6 GB free disk space for software installation.
Apple users in most cases will have to run Windows in parallel, so you’ll
need the latest version of OS X (Yosemite) on a Mac with a quad-core
processor and 32 GB of RAM.
BIM SoftwareAllPlan, allplan.com
ArchiCAD, graphisoft.com
Autodesk Revit, autodesk.com
Bentley, bentley.com
Specifi , specifi global.com
Tekla, tekla.com
VectorWorks, vectorworks.net
BIM Resources• BIM-speak glossary of BIM terms:
newmill.com/pdfs/BIMspeak.pdf
• NAFEM/FCSI guidelines/standards for building equipment families in
Revit: c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.fcsi.org/resource/resmgr/americas_
resources/revit_foodservice_equipment.pdf
• Revit design video tutorials:
lynda.com/CAD-training-tutorials/1665-0.html
• Generic foodservice equipment objects for BIM software:
cmdgroup.com/smartbuildingindex/foodservice-equipment/bim
• Specifi c foodservice equipment objects for Autodesk Revit:
foodeqsym.com; specifi global.com/products/symbol-creation-services;
kclcad.com; rev-equip.com
• Specifi c foodservice equipment objects for AutoCAD and Bricscad:
specifi global.com/products/symbol-creation-services; kclcad.com
“When we did drawings the old-fashioned
way, by hand, we always seemed to end up with
a worktable leg sitting right on top of a fl oor
drain or seam,” says Doyals. “Or the ice-making
head on a beverage dispenser wouldn’t fi t under
the dropped ceiling. Now we can see those
things in 3D and fi x them before construction
starts. As soon as we link our design with the
architect’s drawings or model we can eliminate
a lot of problems.”
Another note about the level of detail used
is that not every aspect of every project has to
strive for level 500. “Not everything has to be
modeled,” Guler says, “so you can transition
from AutoCAD to Revit to get some 3D model-
ing, but still draft other pieces of the project in
AutoCAD.”
Big WinnersWhich brings up the question of how to make
the leap from your current
technology and processes
to BIM. One multi-unit
operator FER spoke with
said, “Because of our poor
experience with Revit we
haven’t done a BIM project.
The biggest issue I see
is the gap in experience
among kids coming out
of school; they know how
to use Revit and BIM but
know nothing about how
to put a building together
or build a restaurant. And
people experienced in food-
service are not typically
trained or profi cient in BIM
or programs like Revit.”
Most of those who are
already working with the
process say that the only
way to get started is to
jump in with both feet.
How depends on your company, your philoso-
phy and situation.
“We’ve found it’s better to hire people with
foodservice design and consulting experience
and train them how to use software like Revit,”
says Doyals.
“It’s probably easier to learn to use software
than to learn the industry,” agrees Guler. “If
you’re a designer, spend a year forcing yourself
to use a program like Revit instead of CAD.
BIM’s not tough to pick up in terms of concept
once you’ve mastered the software. If you’re
an operator, request BIM in your RFPs, or hire
a fi rm to handle templates, products families,
parameters and standards.”
On the other hand, everyone in the industry
was a newbie at some point. “It’s all about men-
toring when you move from one paradigm to
another,” Hnatschenko says. “Each succeeding
generation has increasingly powerful tools, and
will do more amazing things with technology.
Find those people the right mentors who can
give them the knowledge they need to leverage
the technology.”
The benefi ts of BIM far outweigh the short-
term pain you might experience learning soft-
ware or new technology.
“I think you have to adopt the concept
whole-heartedly,” Guler says. “I don’t think you
can adopt a few elements and make it work.
People now want more information on projects.
We used to do a set of drawings which led to
permits and construction bids, but with virtual
models we can get so much more, faster. The fact
that you’re not drafting, that alone makes BIM
cost-effective.”
“As more information becomes available from
manufacturers in BIM format, I can see even
smaller chains really benefi tting from this,”
Doyals says. “If they have all the data on their
equipment packages and décor packages in the
system, they can easily change and rearrange
layouts or specifi c elements of the design when
the physical dimensions of their stores change.”
“Portfolios of projects, like a chain of restau-
rants, is becoming more prevalent now in BIM,
not just single projects,” Hnatschenko says. “The
process and amount of information that can be
included means they can look at and compare
stores in the portfolio in terms of performance
and lifecycle.”
“Using BIM will provide large foodservice
chains with a range of value engineering options
that will help them not only meet new stricter
building requirements, but also various scenari-
os showing the direct impact of design solutions
on constructions costs, construction schedules,
subsequent operations costs and lifecycle main-
tenance of the building and foodservice equip-
ment,” says Terzi. “Smaller businesses also are
ideally suited to adopting BIM—they can make
decisions and adapt client/project/industry
needs really quickly if they’ve learned how to
use it.” fer
the leap from your current
technology and processes
to BIM. One multi-unit
operator
said, “Because of our poor
experience with Revit we
haven’t done a BIM project.
The biggest issue I see
is the gap in experience
among kids coming out
of school; they know how
to use Revit and BIM but
know nothing about how
to put a building together
or build a restaurant. And
people experienced in food-
service are not typically
trained or profi cient in BIM
or programs like Revit.”
Most of those who are
already working with the
process say that the only
way to get started is to
jump in with both feet.
At fi rst, Revit and
other software did
not have a category
for foodservice
equipment. That has
changed dramati-
cally and extensive
libraries of equip-
ment families are
available. Courtesy
of Specifi .