building smarter organizations km@ksu webinars #smartorg @dynamicadaptatn gordon vala-webb february...

50
Building smarter organizations KM@KSU Webinars #smartorg @dynamicadaptatn Gordon Vala-Webb February 2013

Upload: alvin-ford

Post on 25-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Building smarter organizations

KM@KSU Webinars

#smartorg@dynamicadaptatn

Gordon Vala-Webb

February 2013

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Our agenda

Slide 2

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Our agenda

1. Introductions

2.Why we need smarter organizations

3.What has been the response so far

4.Why are our organizations dumb?

5.What we can do about it

6.If we get it right

7.Questions

Slide 3

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Introductions

1Slide 4

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Introductions

Who are you?

Slide 5

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Who is me?

Advice / teachingDynamic Adaptation

Previously KM Director:• PwC Canada• Gov’t agency

Global lead (design / value) PwC social network

15 years in public sector

No profit :(Non-profit

Slide 6

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Why we need smarter organizations (Drucker, Dilbert and Debs)

2Slide 7

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Drucker

“Most of what we call management consists of making it difficult for people to get their work done”

Slide 8

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

The Dilbert index . . . most workers could not care less about their work

71%Of American workers are

"not engaged" or "actively disengaged“

in their work

Source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/150383/majority-american-workers-not-engaged-jobs.aspx

Slide 9

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com Slide 10

Sickness absence, presenteeism and labour turnover costs the UK economy yearly

What would Debs think?

£26bnSource: UK Foresight Project on Mental Capital and Wellbeing http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2011/jul/15/happiness-work-why-counts

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

A comparisonLarge

organizations

?

?

?

?

Slide 11

Sheep

Slow

Follow the flock

Not fun

Can’t fly

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Meanwhile the “new” world puts new demands on our organizations

New world

Complex

Discontinuity

Ambiguous

Slide 12

Old world

Stable

Repeatable processes

Authoritative knowledge

Adapted from Kent Greenes, “Knowledge Leadership, KMWorld 2011

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

The pressure is mounting

. . .Global hyper-competition

. . .Power shifting from West to East. . .Slow growth. . .Youth unemployment. . .Public sector fiscal crises

Slide 13

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

The result, in the most extreme cases, extinction!

Slide 14

Image source http://stevedenning.typepad.com/steve_denning/2011/01/is-the-problem-with-capitalism-that-people-try-to-fix-it.html

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

What has been the response so far?

3Slide 15

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

The response so far . . . Belt tightening

Exhortations “do more with less”Cost control / layoffsBusiness process re-engineeringMergers / acquisitionsOffshoringMore to come:. . . cloud, remote working

Slide 16

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Why are our organizations dumb?

4Slide 17

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

With each doubling of city population, each inhabitant is, on average, 15 percent wealthier, 15 percent more productive, 15 percent more innovative, and 15 percent more likely to be victimized by violent crime

For cities, bigger is better

Slide 18Source: http://www.pnas.org/content/104/17/7301.full

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Larger size: cities versus companies

Slide 19

Power rules – city versus companiesSource: http://kallokain.blogspot.ca/2012/11/why-cities-live-and-companies-die.html

Cities – get smarter Companies

- don’t or get less smart

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

In companies with over 1,000 employees, the average productivity of an employee drops by more than ¼ for each order-of-magnitude increase

Slide 20

For organizations size matters - but not in a good way

Source: http://www.cybaea.net/Blogs/Data/Employee-productivity-as-function-of-number-of-workers-revisited.html

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Work has been getting “smarter”

Slide 21

Source: http://cdn.dupress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Screen-Shot-2012-10-01-at-9.20.13-PM.png?2b7236

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

And now makes up 41% (and growing) of jobs

Slide 22

https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Preparing_for_a_new_era_of_knowledge_work_3034?srid=520

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Three reasons

1) The Maze-trix

2) Mind the gap

3) Old think

Slide 23

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Big Cheese

2nd Level Cheese

2nd Level Cheese

2nd Level Cheese

Assistant

1) The maze-trix: boundaries increase efficiency within a unit but make co-ordinating across difficult

Slide 24

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

1) The maze-trix example: approving a contract change request at an aerospace company

Slide 25

Source: http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/the-focused-company.aspx

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

1) The maze-trix: symptoms

•Exponential growth of decision intersection points

•Unclear reporting lines

•Meeting overload

•Email overload

•Slow information flows

•Lack of “complete picture”

•Decision paralysis

Slide 26

We need to schedule a meeting

To plan for the meeting

To discuss why we have so many meetings

http://www.zazzle.ca/i_need_to_schedule_a_meetingto_plan_the_meeting_mug-168219332576188320

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

2) Mind the gap: Bigger = bureaucratic mgmt.= less engaged /high performing staff

Slide 27

Complexity

% of highly engaged /performing staff

Mgmt& rules

Adapted from: “Netflix Culture” http://www.slideshare.net/reed2001/culture-1798664#text-version

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

2) Mind the gap: symptoms

•Increasing bureaucracy and formality•Inefficient internal processes•Decrease in % of high performers• Decrease in % of engaged or highly

engaged staff•Over-engineering•Wait times

Slide 28

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

3) Old think versus new think

New think

Integrative culture

Feeling animals

Internal reward

Connected

Brain is plastic

Slide 29

Old think

Control culture

Thinking animals

External reward

Selfish

Brain is fixed

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

3) Old think: hierarchy is in our corporate blood

“U.S. corporations are historically imprinted with a hierarchical

model—you develop something at headquarters, you scale it, and

then you diffuse it.”Rakesh Khurana

Harvard Business School

Slide 30

http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00164?pg=all

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

3) “Old think”: symptoms

Leadership by command and broadcast

“SMART” performance goals

Monetary rewards

Fault-finding

Low trust levels

Slide 31

http://c15056394.r94.cf2.rackcdn.com/MITSMR-Deloitte-Social-Business-What-Are-Companies-Really-Doing-Spring-2012.pdf

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

What we can do about it

5Slide 32

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

It can be done . . .

“less than 30% of the top banks we studied were able to improve their efficiency while maintaining healthy growth”

Slide 33

Source: http://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/?p=6500

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Three approaches

1) Leadership renewal

2) A new organizational bicycle

3) Simplicity

Slide 34

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

1) Leadership renewal

Concentration of power equals abuse of power . . Such concentrations are blood clots

in the circulatory system of society. . . The circulation of

wealth, resources, and, especially, ideas, is blocked.

In a healthy system, information flows are

unimpeded by clots of power or the sclerosis of hierarchy.

Philip Slater, The Chrysalis Effect

Slide 35

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

1) Leadership renewal: “The fish rots from the head down”

•Reject the “control” culture

•Establish shared goals

•Connect through conversation

•Embrace emergence

•Transparency in decision making

•Build trust

•Learn to use social media

•Authentic selves (Empathy versus egotism)

Slide 36

“The soft stuff is the hard stuff” Jack Welch

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

2) A new organizational bicycle

Slide 37

“A bicycle makes man the most efficient mover on the earth.A computer is a bicycle for our mind.” Wilson Miner

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Emailed Knowledge

2) New bicycle

Slide 38

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

2) New bicycle: First we kill all the emails

39

. . . information, ideas and questions become isolated - they only go to the people who received the message

. . . trying to have a conversation is really hard

. . . it becomes a guessing game when working on a document together (“who made what changes to which version?”)

. . . the information disappears over time so that anyone joining the conversation late has a hard time coming up to speed

With social networking . .With emails . . .

Source: http://www.pwc.com.ar/es_AR/ar/publicaciones-por-industria/assets/transforming-collaboration-with-social-tools.pdf

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

2) New bicycle: Enhancing knowledge flows

Non-social SocialClosed (one to few) Open (many to many)Push Pull (subscription)Inside OutsideEphemeral PersistentBroadcast User-generated

Slide 40

“We shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us.”Marshall McLuhan

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

2) New bicycle: Flows across boundaries

41

Outside

Near-side

Inside

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

2) New bicycle: Some issues

42

Reputation

Security

Intellectualpropertyleakage

Regulatoryrequirements

Recordsmanagement

Privacy /Confidentiality

Lost productivity

$

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

3) Simplicity: Not that simple

Manage down the complexity:

•Products

•Processes

•Organizational capabilities

Slide 43

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

If we get it right . . .

6Slide 44

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

If we get it wrong . . . extinction!

“It’s not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent,

but the one most responsive to change.”

Charles Darwin

Slide 45

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

If we get it right . . .

Slide 46Source: http://www.slideshare.net/dhinchcliffe/enterprise-20-summit-2012-closing-keynote

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

If we get it right . . .

“By fully implementing social technologies, companies have an opportunity to raise the productivity of interaction workers—high-skill knowledge workers, including managers and professionals—by 20 to 25 percent.” McKinsey Global Institute, July 2012

Slide 47

Google’s share price

An IBM study of 1,700 worldwide CEOs found that companies who outperform their peers are 30% more likely to identify openness – often characterized by the greater use of social tools – as a key influence on their organization.

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Questions?

7Slide 48

www.Dynamic Adaptation.com

Questions? Comments?

?Slide 49

Thank you . . .

Gordon (at)

DynamicAdaptation.com

www.DynamicAdaptation.com

Twitter: @dynamicadaptatn

416-565-3217

Slide 50

This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, Gordon Vala-Webb and Dynamic Adaptation does not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.

© 2013 Gordon Vala-Webb. All rights reserved.