bulkley leverette analysis.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Bulkley Leverette analysis.pdf
1/9
TPG4150 Reservoir Recovery Techniques 2013Hand-out note 4: Buckley-Leverett Analysis
Norwegian University of Science and Technology Professor Jon KleppeDepartment of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics 5.09.13
1/9
BUCKLEY-LEVERETT ANALYSIS
Derivation of the fractional flow equation for a one-dimensional oil-water system
Consider displacement of oil by water in a system of dip angle !
We start with Darcys equations
qo =!kkroA
o
"Po"x
+#ogsin$&'
)*
qw =!kkrwA
w
"Pw"x
+#wgsin$&'
)* ,
and replace the water pressure by Pw= P
o! P
cow, so that
qw =!kkrwA
w
"(Po!Pcow)"x
+#wgsin$&'
)*.
After rearranging, the equations may be written as:
!qo
o
kkroA="P
o
"x+#ogsin$
!qw
w
kkrwA="P
o
"x!
"Pcow
"x+#wgsin$
Subtracting the first equation from the second one, we get
! 1
kAqw
w
krw! qo
o
kro
#$
&' =!
(Pcow(x
+)*gsin+
Substituting forq =q
w+q
o
and
fw =qw
q,
and solving for the fraction of water flowing, we obtain the following expression for thefraction of water flowing:
!
-
8/13/2019 Bulkley Leverette analysis.pdf
2/9
-
8/13/2019 Bulkley Leverette analysis.pdf
3/9
TPG4150 Reservoir Recovery Techniques 2013Hand-out note 4: Buckley-Leverett Analysis
Norwegian University of Science and Technology Professor Jon KleppeDepartment of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics 5.09.13
3/9
Let us assume that the fluid compressibility may be neglected, ie.
!w=constant
Also, we have that
qw = f
wq
Therefore
!
"fw"x
=
A#
q
"Sw"t
Sincefw (Sw ) ,
the equation may be rewritten as
!
dfw
dSw
"Sw"x
=
A#
q
"Sw"t
This equation is known as the Buckley-Leverett equation above, after the famous paper byBuckley and Leverett1in 1942.
Derivation of the frontal advance equation
SinceS
w(x,t)
we can write the following expression for saturation change
dSw=
!Sw
!xdx +
!Sw
!tdt
In the Buckley-Leverett solution, we follow a fluid front of constant saturation during thedisplacement process; thus:
0 =!S
w
!xdx +
!Sw
!tdt
Substituting into the Buckley-Leverett equation, we get
dx
dt=
q
A!
dfw
dSw
Integration in time
1Buckley, S. E. and Leverett, M. C.: Mechanism of fluid displacement in sands, Trans.
AIME, 146, 1942, 107-116
-
8/13/2019 Bulkley Leverette analysis.pdf
4/9
-
8/13/2019 Bulkley Leverette analysis.pdf
5/9
TPG4150 Reservoir Recovery Techniques 2013Hand-out note 4: Buckley-Leverett Analysis
Norwegian University of Science and Technology Professor Jon KleppeDepartment of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics 5.09.13
5/9
saturation discontinuity at xf and balancing of the areas ahead of the front and below the
curve, as shown:
The final saturation profile thus becomes:
Balancing of areas
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1
x
Sw
A1
A2
Final water saturation profile
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1
x
Sw
-
8/13/2019 Bulkley Leverette analysis.pdf
6/9
TPG4150 Reservoir Recovery Techniques 2013Hand-out note 4: Buckley-Leverett Analysis
Norwegian University of Science and Technology Professor Jon KleppeDepartment of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics 5.09.13
6/9
The determination of the water saturation at the front is shown graphically in the figure below:
The average saturation behind the fluid front is determined by the intersection between thetangent line and fw =1:
At time of water break-through, the oil recovery factor may be computed as
RF=Sw! S
wir
1! Swir
The water-cut at water break-through is
WCR = fwf (in reservoir units)
Since qS =qR /B, and fwS =qwS
qwS +qoSwe may derive fwS =
1
1+1! fwfw
Bw
Bo
or
Determination of saturation at the front
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1
Water saturation
fw
Swf
fwf
Determination of the average saturationbehind the front
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1
Water saturation
fw
Sw
-
8/13/2019 Bulkley Leverette analysis.pdf
7/9
TPG4150 Reservoir Recovery Techniques 2013Hand-out note 4: Buckley-Leverett Analysis
Norwegian University of Science and Technology Professor Jon KleppeDepartment of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics 5.09.13
7/9
WCS =
1
1+1! fw
fw
Bw
Bo
(in surface units)
For the determination of recovery and water-cut after break-through, we again apply the frontaladvance equation:
xSw =qt
A!(df
w
dSw)Sw
At any water saturation, Sw, we may draw a tangent to the fw! curve in order to determine
saturations and corresponding water fraction flowing.
Determining recovery after break-through
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1
Water saturation
fw
Sw
Sw
-
8/13/2019 Bulkley Leverette analysis.pdf
8/9
-
8/13/2019 Bulkley Leverette analysis.pdf
9/9
TPG4150 Reservoir Recovery Techniques 2013Hand-out note 4: Buckley-Leverett Analysis
Norwegian University of Science and Technology Professor Jon KleppeDepartment of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics 5.09.13
9/9
As may be observed from the fractional flow expression
fw =
1+kkroA
qo
!Pcow
!x" #$gsin%
'(
*+
1+kro
o
w
krw
,
capillary pressure will contribute to a higher fw (since!P
cow
!x>0), and thus to a less efficient
displacement. However, this argument alone is not really valid, since the Buckley-Leverettsolution assumes a discontinuous water-oil displacement front. If capillary pressure is includedin the analysis, such a front will not exist, since capillary dispersion (ie. imbibition) will take
place at the front. Thus, in addition to a less favorable fractional flow curve, the dispersion willalso lead to an earlier water break-through at the production well.