bur failure.pdf

Upload: gpirndsc

Post on 02-Jun-2018

239 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    1/28

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    2/28

    1

    Premature failure analysis of forged cold back-up roll in a continuous

    tandem mill

    Hamid Reza Bakhsheshi Rad1,2, Ahmad Monshi2, Hassan Jafari1, 3, Mohd Hasbullah Idris1,

    Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir1

    1Materials Engineering Dept., Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi

    Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia2Materials Engineering Dept., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad branch, Isfahan, Iran

    3Materials Engineering Dept., Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher

    Training University, Tehran 16785-136, Iran

    Cooresponding author:

    Hamid Reza Bakhsheshi Rad

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    Add: No. 801, U8A, Kolej Perdana, UTM, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia

    Tel.: 0060-147382258

    Fax.: 0060-75534610

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    3/28

    2

    Abstract

    In this paper, premature failure of a forged back-up roll from a continuous tandem mill was

    investigated. Microstructural evolutions of the spalled specimen and surface of the roll were

    characterized by optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy andferritscopy, while hardness value of the specimen was measured by Vickers hardness testing.

    The results revealed that the presence of pore and MnS inclusion with spherical and oval

    morphologies were the main contributing factors responsible for the poor life of the back-up

    roll. In addition, metal pick up and subsequently strip welding on the surface of the work roll

    were found as the major causes of failure in work roll which led to spalling occurrence in the

    back-up roll. Furthermore, relatively high percentage of retained austenite, say 9%, in outer

    surface of the back-up roll contributed spalling due to conversion of this meta-stable phase to

    martensite and creation of volume expansion on the outer surface through work hardeningduring mill campaign.

    Keywords:A. Ferrous metals and alloys; F. Microstructure; H. Failure analysis

    1. Introduction

    In rolling mill operation a four roll high stand tandem mills including two work rolls and two

    back-up rolls are used to reduce force and power of work roll as well as increase the accuracy

    and thickness uniformity of thin sheets. Back-up rolls are the main trait of hot and cold roll

    mills which decrease unintended bending and support the work rolls, enabling them to endure

    higher loads without failing [1]. Work roll reduces the thickness of strip by plastic

    deformation which creates by high compressive stress via the rolls. Generally, steel material

    used for back-up roll is refined in electric arc furnace followed by vacuum degassing. The

    produced ingot is then forged and subsequently differential heat treatment is performed in

    order for the material to withstand the campaign in milling. Repeated loading under bending

    and compressive stresses, severe friction and wear under corrosive environments at high

    temperatures are some conditions that back-up rolls should endure during mill campaign

    [2,3].

    The main reason for premature failure of the forged back-up roll can be the combined effects

    of mechanical and metallurgical factors. Mechanical factors include rolling parameter

    misalignment, uneven roll surface, lubrication, bearing, rolling speed seizure, insufficient

    stock removal during grinding and the experience of operators [4,5]. Metallurgical factors

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    4/28

    3

    comprise the presence of nonmetallic inclusions, localized overloading, casting defects,

    temperature gradients due to insufficient cooling and phase transformations [5,6]. It was

    observed [6] that spalling, cracking, metal pick up and subsequently strip welding are three

    critical factors responsible for the poor service life of back-up and work rolls during milling

    operation.Spalling can be classified into two types. The first type is surface initiated spalling, which is

    identified by fatigue path accompanied arrest marks, originate from thermally crack or

    mechanically indentation, and subsequently fatigue path propagates circumferentially

    opposite to the direction of roll rotation. The second one, subsurface initiated spalling, which

    is recognized by the presence of a concentric fatigue pattern (fish eye) on the fracture surface

    with arrest marks in the form of oval pattern, originates from a material defect and propagates

    in different directions away from the initiation site usually within a single plane of

    propagation [3]. In the present study the premature failure of a forged back-up cold roll usedfor continuous tandem cold strip rolls was investigated. The main factors affecting the

    premature failure of the forged back-up roll were determined and analyzed [3,7].

    2. Experimental procedure

    A spalled sample from a forged back-up roll used in a 5 stand 4 Hi tandem mill was

    investigated. The chemical composition and detailed specifications of the forged back-up and

    work cold rolls are given in Table 1 and 2, respectively. The sample was washed thoroughly

    with running distilled water, rinsed and ultrasonically degreased with acetone and dried.

    Afterwards, it underwent microstructural and fractographic examinations. To prevent

    converting back up roll being scraped and any phase transformation during cutting as well as

    to obtain reliable results several methods were investigated for sampling; consequently a ring

    (Fig.1a) measuring 1365 mm in diameter, 15 mm in thickness and 100 mm in depth was

    carefully removed during 24 hours from a tandem mill back up roll by heavy duty lathe

    machine (INNSE 62"). Several samples (Fig.1b) were then cut from the ring for further

    microstructural and microhardness experiments.

    Table 1

    Table 2

    Figure 1

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    5/28

    4

    Microstructure of the samples prepared from the working surface and spalling specimen was

    characterized via optical (OM) and scanning electron microscopes (SEM) equipped with

    energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS), while microhardness value of the samples was

    measured by Vickers hardness testing method using 10 Kg force. For microstructural

    examination of phases, the specimens were etched in Vilella's reagent (1 g C 6H3N3O7, 5 mLHF, 95 mL CH3CH2OH) and Berahas reagent (3 g K2S2O5, 10 g Na2S2O3, 100 mL H2O).

    Fischer MP3 ferritscope was employed to measure the amount of ferromagnetic -

    martensite phase of the samples. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out on the

    samples to measure retained austenite content by measuring the integrated intensities of

    (111)and (110) diffractions using equations (1) [8]:

    V= 1.4l/ (I+ 1.4l) (1)

    where V is the volume fractions of austenite and Iand Iare the integrated intensities of

    (111)and (110) peaks, respectively.

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1. Hardness profile measurement

    Hardness profile, Fig. 2, was measured at every 5 mm distance from the working surface of

    back-up roll. As can be observed, hardness value of the samples decreased from 607 to 489

    HV with increasing the distance from the working surface. However, there was a fluctuation

    in hardness value between 607 to 553 HV until the 17 mm distance from the surface of the

    back-up roll. The result revealed that the hardness value of the roll was almost close to the

    normal, whilst the main reason of fluctuated behavior in hardness profile may attributed to

    the softening some parts of working surface [3,4]. Fig 3 shows the microstructure of the

    softening regions indicating a large amount of precipitated carbide caused by superficial

    tempering due to localized heating.

    Figure 2

    Figure 3

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    6/28

    5

    3.2. Microstructure

    Fig. 4 shows optical microstructures of the back-up roll material as a function of depth from

    the roll surface. Figs. 4a and b represent the microstructures of the samples cut from 5 mm

    and 15 mm distances from the surface of the back-up roll showing high percentage oftempered martensite, approximately 87% and 67% volume fraction, retained austenite,

    around 9.5% and 9.2% volume fraction, respectively, and chromium carbide. Due to the

    presence of medium amount of carbon and alloying elements in chemical composition of the

    steel, retained austenite usually coexists with tempered martensite in microstructure after

    continuous cooling process [3,7]. However, the microstructure of the sample selected from 15

    mm distance from the surface exhibited small amount of non-tempered martensite and

    bainite, owing to a decrease in cooling rate with an increase in distance from the surface of

    the roll. The reason for transforming austenite to bainite is accessibility of sufficient time forcarbon to have long range diffusion in the microstructure. The microstructure of the samples

    in 55 mm and 70 mm depths from the roll surface comprised low percentage of volume

    fractions of martensite, spheroidised pearlite, retained austenite and a considerable amount of

    undissolved carbide, as seen in Figs. 4c and d. At the inner layer, precipitation of undissolved

    carbide occurred in the microstructure due to sufficient heat and time during continuous

    cooling of the material.

    Figure 4

    3.2.1. Retained austenite

    The content of retained austenite from surface to depth of the back-up roll was determined by

    the XRD analysis. Fig. 5 exhibits the variation of retained austenite content versus depth from

    surface of the back-up roll. The content of retained austenite was measured as relatively low

    as 5.3% at inner layer, while it was almost high in the outer layer, about 9.5%. The optical

    microstructure evolutions of the specimens in 5 and 75 mm distance from the surface of the

    roll are shown in Figs. 6a and b, respectively. It can be seen that the content of retained

    austenite (light area) in outer layer is higher than inner layer of the roll. As a matter of fact, in

    differential hardening method, the surface barrel of back-up roll was subjected to

    austenitization process by back-up roll differential heat treatment furnace. Subsequently the

    surface barrel was heated to about 900C for a few hours which lead to a decrease in

    temperature gradient from the outer layer towards the inner layer. This will result in the outer

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    7/28

    6

    layer having a higher temperature compared to the inner layer causing an increase in the

    solubility of chromium carbide in the outer layer. This will increase the concentration of

    alloying elements in the solution which leads to martensite start temperature (MS) decreased

    significantly [9]. The martensite finish temperature (Mf) will subsequently fell to under room

    temperature which brought about a large amount of non-transformed austenite microstructureat the outer layer [10,11]. During mill campaign, this meta-stable phase can transform into

    martensite through work hardening which creates external pressure due to volume expansion

    and causes spalling.

    Figure 5

    Figure 6

    3.2.2. Carbide characterization

    Fig. 7 shows SEM microstructures of the back-up roll material as a function of depth from

    the roll surface in the region away from spalled sample. It was revealed that all samples

    comprised carbides with different morphologies, sizes, volume fractions and distribution in

    the matrix of tempered martensite. Figs. 7 a and b indicate the microstructure of the sample in

    5 mm depth from the surface of the back-up roll. As can be seen high volume fraction of fine

    spherical carbide homogeneously has distributed in tempered martensite matrix. Thismicrostructure increases wear resistance of the steel and subsequently improves service life

    of the back-up roll. Figs. 7c and d represent the microstructure of the sample selected from a

    depth of 20 mm from the surface of the roll. It can be seen that significant volume fraction of

    irregular shaped carbide compared to the previous sample has distributed uniformly in the

    microstructure. Figs. 7e and f exhibit the microstructure of the inner layer (40 mm distance

    from the surface) of the roll encompassing coarse needle shaped carbide with lower volume

    fraction and heterogeneously distributed in the matrix. It is believed that the needle shape of

    the carbide acts as the center for crack initiation and propagation. Moreover, intersectionpoint of the coarse needle shaped carbide can be an impact in accelerating crack initiation and

    propagation. Therefore, it causes poor service life of the back-up roll.

    Figure 7

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    8/28

    7

    EDS analyses and quantitative microprobe of the carbides are shown in Fig. 8. Based on the

    quantitative microprobe, it can be concluded that the stoichiometry of the carbides in all

    samples were M7C3due to the atomic percentage ratio of carbon to other elements is almost

    equal to 3:7 [12,13]. The EDS analysis of carbide in outer layer of the back-up roll (5 mmdistance from the surface) include 8.57% C, 87.22% Fe, 2.08% Cr, 0.53%Mo and 0.61%Mn.

    The atomic percentage of carbon was about 30.30%, whilst the entire atom percentage of the

    other associate elements was 70.20% which indicated that the stoichiometry of the carbide

    was (Fe,Mn,Mo,Cr)7C3(Fig. 8a). In the middle and inner layers, 20 and 40 mm distance from

    the surface respectively, the (Fe,Mo,Cr)7C3 carbide contain around 8.48% C, 87.07% Fe,

    4.01% Cr and 0.44%Mo (Fig. 8b and c).

    Figure 8

    3.2.3. Non-metallic inclusion

    Fig. 9 shows the presence of inclusion in the samples of 10 and 15 mm distance from the

    surface of the back-up roll. The EDS analysis of working surface exhibited that the

    stoichiometry of inclusion was manganese sulfide (MnS) with globular and oval

    morphologies, as given in Figs. 9a and b. The inclusion contain 40.83% S and 59.17% Mn

    while, the atomic percentage of it was 54.12% and 45.88% for S and Mn, respectively

    (Fig. 9d). Generally, the inclusion can be originated from steel making process and it is

    believed that during plastic deformation inclusion can act as a critical location for

    concentration of dislocation and stress, so it causes crack to initiate in inclusion/matrix

    interface [14, 15] subsequently it propagates and spalling occur in the outer layer. Stress

    concentration is created in the interface as a result of two main factors, namely the difference

    in thermal expansion coefficients of inclusion and matrix and the concentrations of

    dislocation due to work hardening.

    Fig. 9c also indicates the presence of pore in the 12 mm distance from the surface of the

    back-up roll. The pore distributed randomly near the spalling surface during the rolling

    operation which might be the location for crack initiation. From this position sub-surface

    crack initiated and propagated within a single plane in all directions away from the initiating

    site [4,6]. Since the roll is continuously dressed up during milling process, the shear and

    residual stresses produced a high accumulated stress. After initiation, the crack propagated

    circumferentially until the strength of the surrounding material was reduced to such a degree

    that large spalling occurred (Fig. 11).

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    9/28

    8

    Figure 9

    3.3. Metal wrapping and strip welding

    Figs. 10a and b show the metal wrapping and strip welding occurred on the surface of the

    work roll during mill campaign, respectively. The strip welding located at the surface of the

    work roll measured as 250 mm length and 130 mm width. Metal wrapping is the most

    important factor for failure of back-up and work rolls which is attributed to improper

    operating techniques. Generally the initial operating temperature of the back-up roll in

    continuous tandem mill is between 90 to 110 C. However, it decreases significantly to about

    55 C by continuous cooling liquid (spray) of water and oil during the milling campaign. But

    when metal wrapping occurs in work roll/ back-up roll contact zone due to the fluctuation in

    thickness of strip within the roll bite, compressive stress increases locally and subsequentlycauses a significant increase in roll surface temperature [16]. This condition leads to rupture,

    welding and even melting of the local region of the strip on the surface of work roll [6]. Fig.

    10c demonstrates a typically round localized indentation (roll mark) formed on the surface of

    the back-up roll having a maximum diameter of approximately 75 mm and a depth of 3 mm.

    The reason for happening this defect can be attributed to the strip welding occurred on the

    surface of the work roll which caused severe plastic deformation on the surface of the back-

    up roll. Afterwards, with continuing milling service, surface cracks initiated from the

    localized indentation area and propagated radially and circumferentially until spallingoccurred.

    Figure 10

    3.4. Spalling

    Fig. 11a indicates overload and bruise areas as well as roll marks on the surface of spalling

    sample of the back-up roll. The hardness of the bruise area was measured as 564 HV showing

    around 27 HV lower than that of the base material, owing to an increase in local temperature

    beyond the tempering temperature of the roll material during mill campaign. The mainsources of bruising in this spalled sample were metal wrapping (strip welding) and

    fluctuation in thickness of strip which can be prevented by controlling operating techniques.

    Figure 11

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    10/28

    9

    Fig 11a indicates roll marks on the spalled sample as well. This kind of indentation can create

    surface cracks by acting as stress concentration factors. The entire roll surface experiences a

    high tensile and compressive stresses cycle during each roll revolution. Therefore, the

    concentration of stress at any roll marks could develop a surface crack. Fig. 11b shows the

    fatigue path with beach mark on the back side of the spalling sample which consists of twoparts, namely shiny (rubbed) and dark (oxidized) areas. As the drawn lines for the

    fractography show, fatigue path initiated and propagated circumferentially as result of

    overload on the surface of the spalled sample, as indicated in Fig. 11a.

    Figs. 12a and b show fatigue cracks which probably initiated from inclusion or pore defects

    on the sub-surface of the back-up roll where stress concentrated. As can be clearly seen in

    Fig. 12c, the presence of dimples at the fracture surface of this spalling sample is an evidence

    for the ductile fracture mechanism which can be attributed to the existence of inclusions and

    pore in the structure. It is reported that [17] inclusions and pore can produce dimple onfracture surface due to creation of the sites for crack nucleation.

    Figure 12

    4. Conclusions

    (1) The presence of spherical and oval MnS inclusions and pores can be acted as the centers

    for crack initiation at the inclusion or pore/matrix interfaces resulted in crack propagation,

    subsequently spalling occurred. Modifying steel making process by new methods such as

    electroslag remelting (ESR) or ladle refine furnace with VOD function (LFV) is a

    recommendation for minimizing the defects.

    (2) The other reason for premature failure of the back-up roll was spalling which created by

    metal wrapping and strip welding in work roll/ back-up roll contact zone. Wrapping and strip

    welding can be reduced by controlling operating techniques and thickness of product being

    rolled.

    (3) Relatively high percentage of retained austenite was found one of the main reasons caused

    poor service life of the roll during mill campaign. This meta-stable phase converted to non-

    tempered martensite through work hardening and created volume expansion led to external

    pressure and spalling occurrence. Triple temper or sub-zero treatment are recommended as

    appropriate remedies to reduce the content of retained austenite.

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    11/28

    10

    (4) Heterogeneously distributed coarse needle shaped carbide in the inner layer of the back-

    up roll with (Fe,Mo,Cr)7C3stoichiometry can be considered as another crack initiation source

    and poor service life of the roll.

    References

    [1] Kang X, Xia D.L, Campbell J, Li Y. Development of cast steel back-up roll. J Cast Met

    Res 2006; 19: 66-71.

    [2] Fractography, vol. 12, ASM Handbook, ASM Int, OH; 1992.

    [3] Pantazopoulos G, Vazdirvanidis A. Fractographic, Metallographic Study of Spalling

    Failure of Steel Straightener Rolls. J Fail Anal and Preven 2008; 8: 509514.

    [4] Wu Q, Sun D.L, Liu C.S, Li C.G. Analysis of surface and sub-surface initiated spalling of

    forged cold work rolls. Eng Fail Anal 2008; 14: 401-410.

    [5] Li H, Jiang Z, Tieu K.A, Sun W. Analysis of premature failure of work rolls in a coldstrip plant. Wear 2007; 263: 14421446.

    [6] Ray A.K, Mishra K.K, Das G, Chaudhary P.N. Life of rolls in a cold rolling mill in a steel

    plant operation versus manufacture. Eng Fail Anal 2000; 7: 55-67.

    [7] Azevedo C.R.F, Neto J.B. Failure analysis of forged and induction hardened steel cold

    work rolls. Eng Fail Anal 2004; 11: 951-966.

    [8] Lee K, Shin H.C, Jang Y.C, Kim S.H, Choi C.S. Effect of isothermal transformation

    temperature on amount of retained austenite and its thermal stability in a bainitic Fe3%Si

    0.45%CX steel. Scripta Mater 2002; 47: 805809.

    [9] Akhbarizadeh A, Shafyei A, Golozar M.A. Effects of cryogenic treatment on wear

    behavior of D6 tool steel. Mater Design 2009; 30: 32593264.

    [10] Flvio J, Sinsio D,lisson R,Emmanuel O,Antnio M. Performance of cryogenically

    treated HSS tools. Wear 2006; 261: 674685.

    [11] Akhbarizadeh A, Golozar M.A, Shafeie A, Kholghy M. Effects of austenizing time on

    wear behavior of D6 tool steel after deep cryogenic treatment. J Iron Steel Res Int, 2009; 16:

    29-32.

    [12] Michaud P, Delagnes D, Lamesle P, Mathon M.H, Levaillant C. The effect of the

    addition of alloying elements on carbide precipitation and mechanical properties in 5%

    chromium martensitic steels. Acta Materialia 2007; 55: 48774889.

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    12/28

    11

    [13]Hoseiny H, Klement U, Sotskovszki P, Andersson J. Comparison of the microstructures

    in continuous-cooled and quench-tempered pre-hardened mould steels. Mater Design 2011;

    32: 2128.

    [14] Nusair Khan A, Muhammad W, Salam I. Failure analysis of bainitic steel pipeFailed

    during cold working process. Mater Design 2010; 31: 26252630.[15]Hashimoto K, Fujimatsu T, Tsunekag N, Hiraoka K, Kida K. Study of rolling contact

    fatigue of bearing steels in relation to various oxide inclusions. Mater Design 2011; 32:

    16051611.

    [16] Gaspard C, Ballani J, Batazzi D, Adams T. Use of HSS rolls to skip the chrome plating

    in cold rolling applications. Materials, Science & Technology 2004; 26-29.

    [17] Salemi A, Abdollah-zadeh A. The effect of tempering temperature on the mechanical

    properties and fracture morphology of a NiCrMoV steel. Mater Charact 2008; 59: 484-468.

    Captions

    Tables

    Table 1. Chemical composition of the 3Cr-MO steel (wt.%).

    Table 2. Detailed specifications of the investigated back-up and work rolls.

    Figures

    Fig. 1. (a) The ring cut from the tandem mill back up cold roll and (b) samples cut from the

    sector of the ring.

    Fig. 2. Hardness profile of back-up roll.

    Fig. 3.SEM micrographs of softening region at (a) 5mm (b) 7mm from the roll surface.

    Fig. 4. Microstructures of material of back-up roll as a function of depth from the roll surface;

    (a) 5, (b) 15, (c) 55, and (d) 70 mm.

    Fig. 5. Content of retained austenite as a function of depth from the surface of back-up roll.

    Fig. 6. Optical microscopic image of retained austenite (light area) as a function of depth

    from the surface of back-up roll; (a) 5 and (b) 75 mm.

    Fig. 7. SEM microstructures of material of back-up roll as a function of depth from the roll

    surface; (a) 5, (b) 20, and (c) 40 mm.

    Fig. 8. EDS analyses of the carbides in the microstructures of back-up roll material as a

    function of depth from the roll surface; (a) 5, (b) 20, and (c) 40 mm.

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    13/28

    12

    Fig. 9. SEM micrographs of samples from different distance departing from surface of back-

    up roll; (a) 10, (b) 15, (c) 12 mm, and d) EDS microanalysis of inclusions in back-up roll.

    Fig. 10. (a) metal warpping, (b) strip welding, and (c) localized indentation on the surface of

    the rolls.

    Fig. 11. (a) overload area, roll marks and bruise area on the surface of spalling sample and (b)fatigue propagation accompanied beach marks on the back side of spalling sample.

    Fig. 12. SEM fractograph of spalling sample revealing; (a) fatigue cracks initiate of inclusion

    of sub-surface of roll, (b) crack propagate radially, and (c) fracture origin with existence of

    dimples.

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    14/28

    13

    Table 1. Chemical composition of the 3Cr-MO steel (wt.%).

    C Si Mn P S Cr Mo Ni Sn As Cu Al

    0.68 0.31 0.77 0.014 0.008 3.15 0.69 0.07 0.005 0.009 0.045 0.003

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    15/28

    14

    Table 2. Detailed specifications of the investigated back-up and work rolls.

    Back-up roll size (mm) 48221525

    Back-up scrap size (mm) 48221365

    Back-up roll weight (Kg) 36310

    Back-up scrap weight (Kg) 31680Back-up surface hardness (HV) 551-587

    Depth of hardened layer (mm) 160

    Work roll size (mm) 3765585

    Work roll scrap size (mm) 3765510

    Work roll weight (Kg) 4865

    Work roll scrap weight (Kg) 4008

    Work roll surface hardness (HV) 874-952

    Depth of hardened layer (mm) 75

    No. of stands 5

    Annual production (ton) 1,500,000

    Maximum speed (m/min) 1150

    Entry strip thickness (mm) 2-4

    Exit strip thickness (mm) 0.18-3

    Coil width (mm) 650-1500

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    16/28

    15

    Research highlight

    Metal wrapping and strip welding in work/back-up rolls contact zone caused spalling

    MnSinclusion and pore initiated crack which propagated in milling led to spalling

    Retained austenite conversion to -martensite accelerated spalling failure

    Needle shaped carbide, (Fe,Mo,Cr)7C3, my cause poor service life of back-up roll

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    17/28

    16

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    18/28

    17

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    19/28

    18

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    20/28

    19

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    21/28

    20

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    22/28

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    23/28

    22

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    24/28

    23

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    25/28

    24

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    26/28

    25

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    27/28

  • 8/10/2019 bur failure.pdf

    28/28