burnout and health behaviors in health professionals from
TRANSCRIPT
1
Burnout and health behaviors in health professionals from seven European countries
Anna Alexandrova-Karamanova1,2, Irina Todorova1, Anthony Montgomery3,Efharis
Panagopoulou4,Patricia Costa
5, Adriana Baban
6,Asli Davas
7, Milan Milosevic
8, Dragan
Mijakoski9
1Health Psychology Research Center, Po Box 238, 1113Sofia, Bulgaria
2Department of Psychology, Institute for Population and Human Studies – Bulgarian Academy
of Sciences,Acad. G. Bonchev str., bl. 6, fl. 5/6, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
3Department of Education and Social Policy,University of Macedonia, 156 Egnatia Street, GR-
540 06 Thessaloniki, Greece
4Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
5BusinessResearchUnit - InstitutoUniversitáriodeLisboa, Av. DasForc_asArmadas, Edificio
ISCTE-IUL, 1649-026Lisbon, Portugal
6Department of Psychology, Babes Bolyai University, 37, RepubliciiStreet, 400015Cluj-Napoca,
Romania
7Department of Public Health,Ege University, HalkSagligi AD 35100 Bornova,Izmir, Turkey
8School of Medicine, Andrija Stampar School of Public Health,University of Zagreb,
Rockefellerova 4, 10000Zagreb, Croatia
9 Institute of Occupational Health of RM, WHO Collaborating Center, II MakedonskaBrigada
43,Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh
Framework Programme [FP7-HEALTH-2009-single-stage] under grant agreement no. [242084].
Corresponding author: Anna Alexandrova-Karamanova, Department of Psychology, Institute for
Population and Human Studies – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev str., bl. 6,
fl. 5/6, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria. E-mail: [email protected];tel. +359 2 979 30 29; fax:
+359 2 870 32 17.
2
Abstract
ObjectivesWithin an underlying health impairing process work stressors exhaust employees’
mental and physical resources and lead to exhaustion/burnout and to health problems, with
health-impairing behaviors being one of the potential mechanisms, linking burnout to ill
health.The study aims to explore the associations between burnout and fast food consumption,
exercise, alcohol consumption and painkiller use in a multinational sample of 2623 doctors,
nurses and residents from Greece, Portugal, Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Croatia and Macedonia,
adopting a cross-national approach.
MethodsData are part of theinternational cross-sectional quantitative ORCAB survey.The
measures included the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Health Behaviors Questionnaire.
ResultsBurnout was significantly positively associated with higher fast food consumption,
infrequent exercise, higher alcohol consumption and more frequent painkiller use in the full
sample, and these associations remained significant after the inclusion of individual differences
factors like age, gender, staff position and unit tenure.Cross-nationalcomparisons showed
significant differences in burnout and health behaviors, and some differences in the statistical
significance and magnitude (but not the direction) of the associations between them.Health
professionals from Turkey, Greece and Bulgaria reported the most unfavorable experiences.
ConclusionsBurnout and risk-health behaviors among health professionals are important both in
the context of health professionals’ health and well-being and as factors contributing to medical
errors and inadequate patient safety. Organizational interventions should incorporate early
identification of such behaviors together with programs promoting health and aimed at the
reduction of burnout and work-related stress.
Keywordsburnout;health behaviors; health professionals; cross-national
3
Introduction
The burnout phenomenon is most often viewed as a syndrome, resulting from prolonged
job stress, including the dimensions of emotional exhaustion (feelings of being overextended and
depleted of one’s emotional and physical resources), depersonalization or cynicism (a negative,
callous, or excessively detached response to various aspects of the job), and reduced personal
accomplishment (feelings of incompetence and a lack of achievement and productivity at work)
(Maslach et al. 2001).Burnout is considered an important issue for a diverse range of
occupations.Since its initial conceptualization it is deemed particularly relevanttocare-giving and
human service occupations, which are interpersonally stressful and emotionally demanding
(Maslach et al. 1996).Burnout has been identified as a serious issue for nurses, physicians and
residents within a number of cultures and countries, among them the USA (Shanafelt, Boone et
al.2012), Canada (Boudreau et al. 2006), the UK (Sharma et al. 2008), the Netherlands (Prins et
al. 2010), Japan (Kanai-Pak et al. 2008), Brazil (Tironi et al. 2010), Germany (Schulz et al.
2009), France(Dreano-Hartz et al. 2015), as well as within countries in the South and South
Eastern Europe, e.g. Italy (Grassiand Magnani2000),Spain (Castelo-Branco et al. 2007),
Portugal(Maroco et al. 2016), Serbia (Putnik and Houkes2011), Romania (Popa et al. 2010),
Greece (Zis et al. 2014), Turkey (Demir et al. 2003).Burnout in healthcare professionals is a
globalconcern both due to its detrimental effect on their health and well-being and because of its
potential impact on quality and safety of patient care.
Comparative analyses of burnout and its determinants and outcomes have been conducted
among medical professionals from multiple nations.Within the International Psychiatry
Residents/ Trainee Burnout Syndrome studyburnoutis studied in respect to working conditions,
mental health and personality within European residents in psychiatry from 24 countries
(Jovanovic et al. 2009; Beezhold et al. 2010). The European General Practice Research Network
explores working conditions, health behaviors and others as factors for burnout among family
doctors from 12 European countries (Soler et al. 2008).Within the European NEXT study
violence from patients, different aspects of teamwork, full-time work,fixed night shifts and time
pressure were determinants of burnout in nurses from 10 European countries(Estryn-Behar et al.
2008), and high prevalence of burnout was a major risk factor for nurses’ intention to leave
(Estryn-Behar et al. 2007).The International Hospital Outcomes Study found that higher levels of
4
burnout were associated with lower quality of care among nurses from six countries (Poghosyan
et al. 2010). Other studies among nurseslink burnout to working conditions, social work
environments, subjective work stressors, personality characteristics, job satisfaction, and
intention to quit (Armstrong-Stassen et al. 1994; Turnipseedand Turnipseed 1997; Schaufeli and
Janczur 1994). All these international studies revealed significant cross-national differences in
burnout rates and burnout relationships with factors from the working environment, health and
personality variables, and quality of care.
One influential theoretical explanation of the development of burnout is provided by the
Job Demands-Resources model(Bakker and Demerouti 2007; Demerouti and Bakker 2011;
Demerouti et al. 2001). Within this theoretical framework all factors associated with job-related
stress are classified in two general categories: job demands (physical, psychological, social or
organizational aspects of the jobrequiring sustained physical/psychological effort or skills and
therefore associated with certain physiological/psychological costs) and job resources (functional
in achieving work goals, reducing job demands and the associatedcosts, stimulating personal
growth, learning, and development).It has been assumedthat an underlying health impairing
process stands in the development of burnout in which high job demands exhaust employees’
mental and physical resources and therefore lead to the depletion of energy (a state of
exhaustion) and to health problems. The Job Demands-Resources modelhas been evidenced to
have high predictive value for employee health and well-being(Bakker and Demerouti 2007;
Demerouti and Bakker 2011).
Reviews analyzing the relationship between burnout and the individual health of
employees indicate that burnout is associated with poor mental health (anxiety, depression,
somatic complaints), poor self-rated health, poor health behaviors, sleep disturbances, obesity,
infectious diseases, reproductive functions, musculoskeletal disorders, and with an increased risk
of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular-related events (Shirom et al. 2005;
Melamed et al. 2006; Shirom 2010a; Schaufeli 2003).It has been proposed that one of the
potential mechanisms, linking burnout to cardiovascular disease and additional physical
morbidities, might be through health-impairing behaviors (Melamedet al. 2006).Researchers
often assume that health-impairing behaviorsfunction as a denial or avoidance coping strategy
and are used for relieving distress in the short term (Shirom 2010a). Though a number of studies
havefound links between chronic stress and different poor health behaviors, theassumption that
5
health behaviors serve as coping is rarelyactually and explicitlyexplored(Park and Iacocca 2014).
While the studies on the relationships between chronic stress/burnout and health behaviors are
correlational in nature and conclusions about causality are limited, there is usually an assumption
that stress is the cause of poor health behaviors. But the reverse position could also be
considered: viewed as wellness practices, behaviors like exercise and healthy eating are studied
as resources withthe potential to prevent burnout in physicians (Shanafelt, Oreskovichel al. 2012;
Swetz et al. 2009; Weight et al. 2012).
The current study explores burnout in relation to several health-impairing behaviors
which have been associated with burnout in different populations, including health professionals
(e.g. Ahola et al. 2012; Goldberg et al. 1996; Gorter et al. 2000; Kristensenet al. 2005; Moustou
et al. 2010; Peterson et al. 2008; Soler et al. 2008): alcohol consumption, lack of exercise
(sedentary lifestyle), unhealthy eating behavior (fast food consumption) and self-medication with
painkillers (analgesics).
The aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between two dimensions of burnout
(emotional exhaustion and depersonalization) and alcohol consumption, physical exercise, fast
food consumption and self-medication through painkillers within a sample of health
professionals from seven South and South Eastern European countries, adopting a cross-national
approach.
Methods
The ORCAB study
The present analysis utilizes data from the international survey “Improving quality and
safety in the hospital: The link between organizational culture, burnout and quality of care
(ORCAB)”, funded by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Programme. The
ORCAB project includes cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative studies among physicians,
nurses and residents in university hospitals from seven South and South Eastern European
countries: Greece, Turkey, Portugal, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, and Macedonia. Its aim is to
benchmark the organizational and individual factors that impact quality of care and patient
safety, and design bottom-up interventions that both increase quality of care and health
6
professionals’ well-being. The theoretical model of ORCAB is based on the assumptions of the
Job Demands-Resources model and studies quality of care, patient safety and health
professionals’ well-being as outcomes, organizational culture and work demands as independent
variables and burnout and work engagement as potential mediators (Montgomery, Panagopoulou
et al. 2011).
Materials and procedure
Burnout
Burnout was measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Services Survey
(MBI-HSS, Maslach et al. 1996). Validated versions of the MBI were used, where available, and
if such didn’t exist, the national research teams translated the inventory (and other measures used
within the study) following Harkness’ (2003) instrument translation procedure.
The present study was restricted to the Emotional Exhaustion (EE) and Depersonalization
(DP) dimensionsof burnout, building on the theoretical assumptions Job Demands-Resources
model. The authors of the model do not consider reduced personal accomplishment as a core and
separate dimension of burnout pointing to evidence that reduced personal accomplishment
correlates less strongly with EE and DP than they correlate with each other, has weaker
relationships with other variables, may be interpreted as a possible consequence of burnout and
is suggested to reflect a personality characteristic similar to self-efficacy (Demerouti et al. 2001;
Demerouti and Bakker 2008).This view is reflected in the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory
(Demerouti et al. 2003). The idea was reconfirmed in an analysis of the convergent validity of
four most widely used burnout measures, showing that burnout is best represented by two
underlying, strongly related factors, namely exhaustion and withdrawal (Qiao and Scaufeli
2011). It is concluded that burnout is best assessed through the EE and DP subscales of the
Maslach Burnout Inventory or through the OldenburgBurnout Inventory. The EE scale
comprised 9 items, and the DP scale – 5 items. Example items are: “I feel emotionally drained
from my work” (EE) and “I feel I treat some patients as if they were impersonal objects”(DP).
Participants responded in a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 6, indicating the frequency in
which they had certain types of feelings in relation to their job from “never”to “every day”. The
7
subscales total scores range from 0 to 45 for EE and from 0 to 30 for DP. Within the present
study both subscales showed high reliability, with Cronbach’s alphas for the full sample being
0.91 for Emotional Exhaustion and 0.83 for Depersonalization, showing excellent and good
internal consistency, respectively. Within the national samples internal consistency coefficients
for the Emotional Exhaustion subscale ranged from 0.84 to 0.92, and for the Depersonalization
subscale Cronbach’s alphas ranged from 0.68 to 0.87(alpha fell below the 0.7 threshold only in
Croatia).
Health Behaviors
The Health Behaviors Questionnaire is a validated questionnaire that has been used
previously with healthcare professionals and civil servants (Moustou et al 2010; Nella et al.
2015;Tsiga et al. 2015). It measures protective health behaviors (e.g. exercise, healthy eating)
and risk health behaviors (e.g. drinking alcohol, smoking, unhealthy eating, self-medication).
The four behaviors, included in this analysis, were evaluated through a single item, regarding
frequency of fast food consumption per week (How many times in a week do you eat fast food?),
frequency of exercise per week (How many times do you exercise per week?), frequency of
alcohol consumption per week (On average, on how many days of the week do you drink
alcohol? (Regardless of the quantity), and frequency of painkiller use per week (On average, how
often per week do you use painkillers?). Participants responded by writing the number,
indicating the frequency of the behavior. The percentage of answers in the range 0-7 is as
follows: 97.9% for fast food, 99.8% for exercise, 100.0% for alcohol consumption and 99.6% for
painkiller use.
Procedure
After approval from the Administrative Boards and Ethical Committees of the
participating hospitals in each country, health professionals from the 7 countries filled in the
structured ORCAB questionnaire. Researchers and research assistants from the national teams
distributed the questionnaire in a hardcopy format. Participants were asked to complete and
return it sealed in an anonymous envelope.
8
Statistical analyses
All statistical analysis were done by means of IBM SPSS Statistics 22.As a first step the
associations between the burnout dimensions and health behaviors were assessed through
bivariate correlations, and items, measuring eating and substance (ab)use behaviors, which had
the strongest relationships with the burnout dimensions,were chosen for further exploration.
Tertiles were created for the two burnout dimensions and participants were classified as having
high, average or low levels of EE or DP in accordance with the identified cut-offs.Descriptive
statistics was used to define the means of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and health
behaviors. One-way ANOVA was used to determine if there were significant differences
between the means of the burnout dimensions and the health behaviors in the groups of health
professionals from different countries. Post-hoc tests (Tukey HSD test) were conducted in order
to make pair-wise comparisons and determine which means were significantly different from
each other.To test the relationship between burnout dimensions and health behaviors, multiple
linear regressions were performed for every behavior as an outcome variable. For the whole
multinational sample, a total of eight hierarchical linear regressions were run (4 with Emotional
Exhaustion as an independent predictor and 4 with Depersonalization as an independent
predictor) with fast food consumption, exercise, alcohol drinking and painkiller use being the
dependent variables. The first block of independent predictorsincluded either EE or DP. In the
second block of variables the individual factors age,gender, staff position (employing two almost
evenly distributed groups of doctors/residents vs. nurses), and unit tenure were added. In the
third block of predictorsthe variable country was added. As a categorical variable with 7 levels
‘country’ was dummy coded with Greece being the reference category.As a final step, the
models including EE or DP in the first block and the individual factors in the second block were
tested separately in every one of the participating countries.
Results
Participants
9
Health professionals from university hospitals in Greece, Turkey, Portugal, Romania,
Bulgaria, Croatia, and Macedonia were recruited through convenience sampling. The total
number of participants was 2623, of whom 627 were doctors, 1431 were nurses and 565 were
residents (Table 1). The largest sample was collected in Greece (N=594), and the smallest in
Croatia (N=193). While nurses prevail in all national samples, some of the samples include very
small numbers (Portugal) or no residents at all (Croatia). At the same time the proportion of
residents is higher than the proportion of doctors in several other countries (Greece, Turkey and
Romania). Given the high proportion of nurses (93.6% of whom are women), women
predominate in the full sample (75.5% women vs. 24.5% men), with the two genders most
evenly represented in Greece and most disproportionately represented in Portugal and Romania.
The mean age of participants is 38.7 years (SD = 10.18 years), being the highest in Croatia and
Bulgaria (about 43-44 years), and the lowest in Portugal and Turkey (about 35 years). The
average reported tenure was 8 years and 10 months (SD = 9 years), with unit tenure ranging from
1 month to 45 years and 9 months. Higher average unit tenure compared to the other samples
were observed in Croatia (17 years and 11 months), and the shortest average unit tenure is
observed in Greece (6 years and 4 months).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insert Table 1 about here
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burnout rates and frequencies of health behaviors
Tertiles for each of the two burnout scales (EE and DP) were created to allow
comparisons across countries for different prevalence categories. The participants were classified
as having high, average or low levels of emotional exhaustion or depersonalization in accordance
with the following cut-offs: EE: high ≥ 26, low ≤ 14; DP: high ≥ 7, low ≤ 2. In our European
sample high EE and especially high DP are defined at lower absolute scores than high EE and
high DP in Maslach’s normative sample of American medical professionals (EE: high ≥ 27, DP:
high ≥ 10) (Maslach, Jackson & Leiter, 1996).
10
Results showed that 31.9% of the health care professionals in the overall sample
experienced high EE and 33.2% experienced high DP. High levels of both burnout dimensions
were observed in 20.9% of the overall sample (Table 2).High emotional exhaustion amounted to
more than 50% in Turkey and to more than 35% in Greece and Bulgaria; in the group of the
remaining countries it ranged from 15% to 21%. High depersonalization was found in almost
60% of Turkish health professionals, in Greekhealth professionals it was above 40%, and in the
remaining countries it ranged from 16% to 23%. High levels of both burnout dimensions at the
same time were found in 45% of Turkish, 26% of Greek and 15% of Bulgarian health
professionals. In Portugal, Romania, Croatia and Macedonia proportions of health care
professionals with high levels of both burnout dimensions were about 9%.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insert Table 2 about here
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The means for the overall sample are 20.68 (SD=12.52) for EE and 5.71 (SD=6.16) for
DP. In the separate countries the mean values for EE showed large differences ranging from
theaverage EE of15.61 in Romania to the high EE of27.88 in Turkey, and for DP ranging from
the average DP of2.94 in Macedonia to the high DP of9.99 in Turkey. Results from one-way
ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc multiple comparisons acknowledged the statistical
significance of the differences (F=50.62 for EE, p<0.001; and F=64.11 for DP, p<0.001). Tukey
HSD post-hoc multiple comparisons tests showed significance of differences between Turkey
and all other countries, with the observed mean in Turkey being well above the EE values in the
other countries. The second highest mean of EE,positioned in the upper end of the average EE
scores,was observed in Greece and Bulgaria (Greece and Bulgaria differed from the other
countries, but not between themselves). Portugal, Romania, Croatia and Macedonia were the
final group of countries, that all shared a similar level of EEin the lower end of the average EE
scores. Cross-national analysis of depersonalization revealed a somewhat dissimilar picture. The
highest level of DPwas again observed in Turkey, and the second highest DP(positioned at the
threshold of high DP) was found in Greece. In third place came Bulgaria, Romania, Portugal and
11
Croatia, with almost equal means, corresponding to average DP. The lowest DP (at the lower end
of the average DP scores)was observed in Macedonia.
Regarding health behaviors, results showed that medical professionals (full sample)
consumed fast food on average about 2.5 times per week, exercised on average about 1.5 times
per week, consumed alcohol and used painkillers on average about once a week (Table 2). One-
way ANOVA revealed significant differences in health behaviors between countries, being most
pronounced in respect to fast food consumption (F=106.34, p<0.001). Post-hoc multiple
comparisons differentiated three groups of countries that differed significantly between each
other. Most often fast food was consumed in Bulgaria and Greece – nearly 4 times per week. The
next group of countries included Turkey and Macedonia, where fast food consumption equaled
twice per week, and the third group comprised of Romania, Croatia and Portugal, where fast
food was consumed once a week. Exercise levels in all countries were similar, amounting to
slightly more than once a week to about twice a week (about 1.5 times per week onaverage). Yet
some differences were observed (F=5.36, p<0.001). The highest physical activity frequency was
observed in Romanian health professionals, and it differed significantly from physical activity
levels in Greece, Portugal, Turkey and Croatia. Macedonian health professionals came after their
Romanian colleagues and their physical activity level differed significantly from that of their
colleagues from Greece. Alcohol and painkillers were both used on average once a week by
health professionals (full sample). Alcohol consumption was most often reported in Bulgaria,
who differed significantly from the group of all other countries except Greece (F=19.07,
p<0.001). Second in alcohol consumption cameGreece (differing significantly from all countries
except Portugal), and Portugal health professionals were third in alcohol consumption, differing
significantly from their Romanian and Croatian colleagues. Painkillers were most often used by
Turkish health professionals – twice weekly – which was double than the use of such
medicaments among their colleagues from the other countries (F=28.43, p<0.001).
Associations between burnout and health behaviors
The results from the 8 hierarchicalregressions ran with the full sample with fast food
consumption, exercise, alcohol drinking and painkiller use being the dependent variablesare
presented in Tables 3 and 4 (Table 3 includes results with EE being an independent variable, and
12
Table 4 includes results with DP being an independent variable). Model 1 regressions included
EE or DP as the independent predictors,in Model 2 regressions age, gender, staff position
(doctor/resident vs. nurse), and unit tenure were addedin a second block of independent
predictors, and in Model 3 regressions the 7-level categorical variable ‘country’ was added in a
third block with Greece being the reference category.The results regarding EE in Model 1
regressions demonstrated that it was significantly positively associated with fast food
consumption, alcohol drinking and painkiller use, and negatively associated with frequency of
weekly exercise (Table 3). The values of the regression coefficient indicated the strongest
relationshipin regard to self-medication through painkillers and the weakest relationshipin regard
to alcohol consumption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insert Table 3 about here
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proportion of the variance in health behaviors which was explained in Model 1
ranged from close to 0% in regard to alcohol consumption, to 7% in regard to painkiller use.
When adding the individual differences variables in Model 2, all the above described
associations remained significant. The R2 change values showed that adding the individual
variablesin Model 2 led to a significant increase in the total variance explained by 1% regarding
exercise, by2% regardingpainkiller use, by5% regarding fast food consumption and by 10%
regarding alcohol consumption. Thus alcohol consumption was the behavior most strongly
(positively) associated with individual characteristics.It was positively related tobeing a male,
being a doctor/resident, and with older age. More frequent fast food consumption was associated
with being a male, being a doctor/resident,and to a shorter unit tenure; more engagement in
exercise was associated with being a male; and more frequent self-medication through
painkillerswas related to being a female. To summarize the significance of the individual
variables, gender was significantly associated with all of the studied behaviors, staff position was
significantly related to fast food consumption and alcohol drinking, unit tenure was significantly
associated only with fast food consumption, and age – only with alcohol consumption.
13
Adding the country from which the participating health professionals came in Model 3
led to a significant increase in the total variance explained by 1% regarding exercise, by 3%
regarding alcohol consumption, by 4% regarding painkiller use, and by 18% regarding fast food
consumption, with associations between EE and health behaviors remaining significant. In
regard to fast food consumption, participants’ country turned out to be its most important
determinant. The inclusion of ‘country’ changed the associations of health behaviors with some
of the individual factors, i.e. more frequent fast food consumption now being associated with
younger age, but not associated with unit tenure anymore; and more frequent alcohol
consumption not associated with age anymore.
The results from the hierarchical regression with DP as independent variable proved to be
quite similar to the above described results. In Model 1 regressions DP was significantly
positively associated with fast food consumption, alcohol drinking and painkiller use, and
negatively associated with frequency of weekly exercise (Table 4). The values of the regression
coefficient indicated the strongest relationship in regard to painkiller use and the weakest
relationships in regard to alcohol consumption and exercise.Comparing the relationships of EE
with health behaviors and of DP with health behaviors we noticed that EE had stronger
relationships with exercise and painkiller use that DP had, and DP had stronger relationship with
alcohol consumption than EE had.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insert Table 4 about here
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proportion of the variance in health behaviors which was explained in Model 1
regressions ranged from 1% in regard to exercise and alcohol drinking to 3% in regard to fast
food consumption and 4% in regard to self-medication through painkillers. When adding the
individual differences variables in Model 2, all the above described associations remained
significant. The R2 change values showed that adding the individual variables in Model 2 led to
(as in the case with EE) a significant increase in the total variance explained by 1% to 4%
(regarding exercise, fast food consumption and painkiller use) and to 9% regarding alcohol
drinking. The results regarding the individual variables in Model 2 regressions with DP as an
14
independent variable were analogous to the above described results for Model 2regressions with
EE as an independent variable.
Adding the country from which the participating health professionals came in Model 3
led to a significant increase in the total variance explained by 1% regarding exercise, by 3%
regarding alcohol consumption, by 5% regarding painkiller use, and by 19% regarding fast food
consumption, with associations between DP and health behaviors remaining significant.
Participants’ countrywasthe most important determinant of fast food consumption. The inclusion
of ‘country’ changed the associations of health behaviors with some of the individual factors, i.e.
more frequent fast food consumption now being associated with younger age, but not associated
with unit tenure anymore; more frequent alcohol consumption not associated with age anymore;
and more frequent painkiller use associated with older age now.
Cross-national differences
In line with our cross-national approach associations between burnout and health
behaviors, adjusted for individual difference factors, were analyzed separately in all of the
participating countries as well.Table 5 presents the results from the linear regression models
including emotional exhaustion or depersonalization as the single predictor variable (Model 1),
so that the R2values for the two burnout dimensions can stand out. Adding the individual
differences variables in the second block of independent predictors within Model 2 didn’t change
the associations between burnout and health behaviors – they all remained significant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insert Table 5 about here
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross-national comparisons showed that statistically significant associations displayed
the same relationships as described above: higher levels of EE or DP were related to more
frequent fast food consumption, less frequent exercise, more frequent alcohol drinking and self-
medication through painkillers. However, while in the full sample burnout dimensions were
15
significantly related to all health behaviors, in many cases the associations between them did not
reach statistical significance in the separate countries(Table 5).
For example, in Portugal and in Croatia only one significant relationship was observed in
regard to EE (in Portugal EE was significantly associated with exercise, and in Croatia – with
painkiller use), and in Macedonia the statistically significant associations were two (one between
EE and alcohol drinking, and one between DP and painkiller use). In Turkey burnout dimensions
were associated with all behaviors (with only one exception – the association between EE and
alcohol consumption), and in the remaining countries the significant relationships add up to
fourin Greece and Bulgaria and to five in Romania (in all three countries EE was associated with
exercise and painkiller use; in Greece and Bulgaria DP was associated with fast food
consumption; in Greece and Romania DP was associated with exercise; in Bulgaria and Romania
DP was associated with alcohol consumption; and in Romania EE was associated with alcohol
consumption).
Some of the observed associations seem to be more universal than others, e.g. EE was
positively related to self-medication through painkillers in all countries except Portugal and to
infrequent exercise in all countries except Croatia and Macedonia, while EE was associated with
fast food consumption, and DP with painkiller use only in Turkey; similarly EE was associated
with alcohol consumption only in Romania. Interestingly, exercise frequency and painkiller use
were associated more often with EE than with DP, while DP was more commonly associated
with fast food and alcohol consumption.
Discussion
Burnout rates
According to our findings, one in every five health professionals in the overall sample
had high scores on both burnout dimensions, and the overall sample means purported to an
average level of both emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Both emotional exhaustion
and depersonalization reached striking proportions in Turkish health professionals. Emotional
exhaustion was also quite high in Greek and Bulgarian health professionals, and
depersonalization – in Greek health professionals. The means for burnout in the separate
16
countries correspond to high EE and high DP in Turkey, upper end of the average EE scores in
Greece and Bulgaria, and the threshold of high DP in Greece. In Portugal, Romania, Croatia and
Macedonia the means corresponded to average levels of EE and DP. In summary, considerable
cross-national differences in regard to EE and DP were observed in our sample of European
health professionals, in agreement with similar studies (e.g. Soler et al. 2008; Beezhold et al.
2010; Poghosyan et al. 2010; Turnipseed and Turnipseed 1997; Schaufeli and Janczur 1994). For
example, within the EGPRN study, comprising European family doctors from Greece, Bulgaria,
Turkey and Croatia, Turkey was a country with lower EE and DP, Greece had higher proportions
of doctors with high DP, and Bulgaria had higher proportions of doctors with high EE (Soler et
al. 2008).
It has been proposed that the differences owing to country of origin may represent
differences due to the health care systems of the participating countries(Soler et al. 2008). Both
Turkey and Bulgaria shared the implementation of major healthcare reforms in the beginning of
the new century, and both Greece and Bulgaria shared the consequences of severe socio-
economic crisis in the past years. Thus we might think of additional stressors encountered by the
health professionals in these countries such as financial and professional insecurity and role
ambiguity in the face of changing health system’s regulations, and working in the situation of
shortage of resources (e.g. lack of materials, equipment and personnel, underpayment), which
contribute to higher levels of burnout and its consequences.Within our study and the framework
of the Job Demands-Resources model we found that physical, organizational and emotional work
demands were highest in Turkey and Greece, and quite high in Bulgaria.
Frequencies of health behaviors
It was found that medical professionals exhibited a largely sedentary lifestyle, exercising
on average only 1.5 times per week, obviously failing to meet recommended amounts of physical
activity needed for health (WHO 2010). They were also prone to unhealthy eating: fast food was
consumed on average 2.5 times per week, which could be considered regular consumption
(Anderson et al. 2011; Odegaard et al. 2012). Alcohol consumption seemed to be infrequent
(about once a week), while painkiller use amounted to once a week on average (in Turkey
17
amounting to twice a week), which could be considered frequent use (Dale et al. 2015;
Samuelsen et al. 2015).
Based on these findings we might assume that there is a risk for medical professionals’
health and well-being due to their unhealthy lifestyle, characterized by physical inactivity,
frequent fast food consumption and frequent painkiller use.The risks associated with physical
inactivity are well established – it has been identified as the fourth leading risk factor for global
mortality; for cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer and their risk factors as raised blood
pressure, raised blood sugar and overweight (WHO 2010).Regarding regular fast food intake, it
has been found that adults consuming Western-style fast food ≥2 times per week had an
increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus and dying of coronary heart disease
(Odegaard et al. 2012). The potential inappropriate use of painkillers is associated with increased
risk of cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal damage, renal disease, renal failure and
interactions with other drugs (Dale et al. 2015; Samuelsen et al. 2015).
The cross-national data point to higher health risks associated with fast food consumption
for Bulgarian and Greek health professionals, who ate fast food on average about four times per
week; the risk is high also for their Turkish and Macedonian colleagues, whose average fast food
consumption was 2 times per week. Turkish health professionals might be at higher risk
associated with regular painkiller use, as they take such medications on average twice weekly
(double than the use of their colleagues from the other countries).
Associations between burnout and health behaviors
It was found that higher emotional exhaustion and higher depersonalization were
significantly associated with more frequent fast food consumption, less frequent exercise, more
frequent alcohol consumption and more frequent painkiller use when analyses were performed
with the full sample, and these weak to moderate associations remained significant after the
individual differences variables had been added to the model.Significance of the burnout-health
bahaviors relationship was retained also after adding participants’ country in the regression.Such
relationships between burnout and the studied health behaviors have been found in other studies
withhealth professionals’ samples, exploring health behaviors as outcomes of burnout. For
example, burnout was associated with an unhealthy diet in dentists (Gorter et al. 2000); it was
18
related to fast food consumption in ambulance workers (Moustou et al. 2010); and stress was
related to fast food consumption in nurses (Steptoeetal. 1998). Lower participation in physical
exercise was associated with burnout in emergency physicians (Goldberg et al. 1996), dentists
(Gorter et al. 2000) and ambulance workers (Moustou et al. 2010). Conversely, engaging in sport
has been related to lower burnout in nurses (Chayu and Kreitler 2011).Burnout was found to be
linked to increased alcohol consumption in dentists (Gorter et al. 2000; Winwood et al. 2003),
emergency physicians (Goldberg et al. 1996) and European family physicians from 12
countries(Soler et al. 2008), to alcohol abuse or alcohol dependence in surgeons (Oreskovich et
al. 2012) and to patterns of social drinking in ambulance workers (Moustou et al. 2010). Higher
levels of burnout predicted weekly painkiller use in employees from the human service sector,
including health professionals (Kristensen et al. 2005).
The burnout-health behaviors relationship can be viewed as a part of an underlying health
impairing process, in which work stressors (job demands) exhaust employees’ mental and
physical resources and lead to burnout/exhaustion and to health problems (Bakker and
Demerouti 2007; Demerouti and Bakker 2011; Demerouti et al. 2001), with health-impairing
behaviors being one of the potential mechanisms, linking burnout to ill health (Melamed et al.
2006). It is proposed that health-impairing behaviors might function as a coping strategy for
relieving distress in the short term (Shirom 2010a).The exact mechanisms through which burnout
links with health behavior needs further investigation and have to be addressed in future
research.For example, painkiller use was the behavior most strongly associated with the burnout
dimensions in our study. It might be expected that frequent painkiller useis tied to the need for
coping with pain and discomfort in cases of existing somatic complaints, established as
consequences or concomitants of burnout (Soares et al. 2007; Bauer et al. 2006; Schaufeli and
Buunk 2003; Schaufeli 2003; Shirom et al. 2005; Melamed et al. 2006). It has been found,
however, that the association between stress and painkiller use remains significant and graded
after adjusting for stress related pain and discomfort (Koushede et al. 2009).
For the specific behaviors, the country from which the participants came from was the
most important determinant of fast food consumption, implying that this behavior is most
strongly associated withcultural appropriateness and to the extent cultures are influenced by and
espouse other lifestyles that are not traditional for that culture (i.e. Western eating practices).
Individual factors were the most important determinant of alcohol consumption.After controlling
19
for country, more frequent alcohol consumption was associated with being a male, and being a
doctor/resident. This is in line with the well-known fact that the frequency of alcohol
consumption and related health risks are higher in men compared to women (WHO 2014). The
same explanation may apply to the staff position of doctor/resident which correlated with male
gender, while virtually all nurses were female.More frequent fast food consumption was
associated with being a male, being a doctor/resident,and with younger age. Regular fast food
consumption has been higher among men and younger adults in other studies as well (Anderson
et al. 2011).More frequent consumption of fast food in males and doctors/residents may be
related to the less proneness of men to prepare (healthy) food, especially when they have such a
busy schedule – the first reason for fast food has been ‘quick and convenient’ (Anderson et al.
2011). Younger age may be associated with the more dynamic lifestyle of younger people with
less attention to the preparation of healthy food, especially if living on their own.More
engagement in exercise was associated with being a male, with males being more physically
active than female being a well-established gender difference. More frequent self-medication
through painkillerswas related to being a female and to older age. More frequent self-prescribed
painkiller use by females is consistent with other studies (Dale et al. 2015;Golar 2011; Naveed et
al. 2014; Samuelsen et al. 2015), and the use of some types of analgesics increases with age
(Dale et al. 2015).
In some of the countries burnout dimensions were not significantly associated with
certain health behaviors, but when the relations were significant, the same direction of
associations was observed. Most universal across countries was the fact that emotional
exhaustion was associated with infrequent exercise and self-medication through painkillers,
which may be due to a common underlying psychological/physiological mechanism. Turkey was
the country, in which virtually all associations were significant and stronger than in the other
countries. Significant associations between burnout dimensions and several health behaviors
were found also in Bulgaria, Greece and Romania.
Strengths and limitations of the study
The main strength of the study is that it assesses the underinvestigatedrelationships
between burnout and health behaviors among health professionals in a number of European
20
countries simultaneously, adopting a cross-national approach. The study comprises health
professionals from seven South and South Eastern European countries thus providing data on
burnout and health behaviors for a region of Europe that is rarely explored.
Alimitation of this study is its cross-sectional design, which does not allow exploration of
underlying mechanisms linking burnout to health behaviors ormaking conclusions regarding the
direction of causality between burnout and health behaviors. Another limitation is that health
behaviors are self-rated and not measured by objective indicators.Among the limitationsof the
studyis that it does not investigate the role of other potential confounders in the burnout - health
behaviors association, such as personality, general philosophical outlooks to life, family situation
and relationships, etc. Also, our convenience sampling approach does not allow us to generalize
our conclusions to the whole population of interest – health professionals working in university
hospitals in the seven South and South Eastern European countries. Thus the observed cross-
national differences might be due to specifics of the samples.The differences among the national
samples in respect to proportions of different staff within the samples might also be a factor to
generalizability of conclusions, as some research infers that significant differences in burnout
and its correlates between doctors, nurses and residents are present (e.g. Embriaco, Papazian et
al. 2007; Panagopoulou et al. 2006).
Conclusions
The study found that burnout dimensions emotional exhaustion and depersonalization
were significantly positively related toseveral risk health behaviorsin a multinational sample of
healthcare professionals from South and South Eastern Europe. Burnout dimensions wereweakly
to moderatelyassociated with higher fast food consumption, infrequent exercise, higher alcohol
consumption and more frequent painkiller use.Moreover, theseassociations remained significant
after the inclusion of individual differences factors like age, gender, staff position and unit
tenure. Within its cross-national approach the studyrevealedsignificant differences between the
participating countries in the means of the burnout dimensions and health behaviors, as well as
some differences in the statistical significance and magnitude (but not the direction) of the
associations between burnout and health behaviors.The country from which the participants
21
came from was the most important determinant of fast food consumption and individual factors
were the most important determinant of alcohol consumption.
Moreover, the study of high risk behaviors among health professionals is important not
only in the context of health behaviors having a negative impact on health and well-being, but
also in the context of these professionals’ roles as care providers. Risky health behaviors (e.g.
psychoactive substance use) have been implicated as factors contributing to medical errors and
inadequate patient safety, as well as affecting medical professionals’ health promotion activities
directed toward patients (Bakhshi and While 2014; Fie et al. 2013; Zhu et al. 2011; Pipe et al.
2009). Organizational interventions should incorporate early identification of such behaviors
together with programs promoting health and aimed at the reduction of burnout and work-related
stress, including the promotion of work engagement, which has been found to foster protective
health behaviors (Alexandrova-Karamanova et al. 2013; Shirom 2010b).
Funding This study was funded bythe European Union’s Seventh Framework ProgrammeGrant
Number 242084.
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approvalAll procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in
accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and
with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
References
AholaK,HonkonenT, PirkolaS, IsometsaE, KalimoR, NykyriE et al(2006)Alcohol dependence in
relation to burnout among the Finnish working population.Addict 101:1438-
1443.doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01539.x
AholaK, Pulkki-RabackL,KouvonenA, RossiH, AromaaA, LonnqvistJ(2012) Burnout and
behavior-related health risk factors: results from the population-based Finnish Health
2000 study. J Occup Environ Med54:17-22.doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e31823ea9d9
22
Akvardar Y,Demiral Y, Ergor G, Ergor
A(2004)Substanceuseamongmedicalstudentsandphysiciansin a
medicalschoolinTurkey.Soc Psych PsychEpid 39:502-506. doi:10.1007/s00127-004-
0765-1
Alexandrova-KaramanovaA, NaydenovaV, TodorovaI(2013)[Work engagement, health
behaviours and subjective well-being in medical professionals from university hospitals].
Angazhiranost v rabotata,
zdravnipovedeniaisubektivnoblagopoluchieprimedicinskispetsialistiotuniversitetskibolnit
si. Bulg J Psychol 1-4:67-84. Bulgarian
AndersonB, RaffertyAP, Lyon-CalloS, FussmanC, ImesG(2011)Fast-food consumption and
obesity among Michigan adults. Prev Chronic Dis 8:A71.
http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2011/jul/10_0186.htmAccessed 13 October 2014
Armstrong-StassenM, Al-Ma ‘AitahR, CameronS, HorsburghM(1994)Determinants and
consequences of burnout: A cross-cultural comparison of Canadian and Jordanian nurses.
Health Care Women Int 15:413-421.doi:10.1080/07399339409516133
BakhshiS, WhileAE(2014)Health professionals’ alcohol-related professional practices and the
relationship between their personal alcohol attitudes and behavior and professional
practices: A systematic review.Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:218-
248.doi:10.3390/ijerph110100218
Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007) The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of
Managerial Psychology, 22:309-328.
BauerJ, StammA, VirnichK,WissingK, MullerU, WirschingM,
SchaarschmidtU(2006)Correlation between burnout syndrome and psychological and
psychosomatic symptoms among teachers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79:199-
204.doi:10.1007/s00420-005-0050-y
BeezholdJ, JovanovicN, AndlauerO,PodlesekA, PappS, FerrariS, MihaiA(2010) YPS01-01 - The
international resident/trainee burnout study: boss international. EurPsychiat 25 Suppl
1:1698.doi:10.1016/S0924-9338(10)71677-1
BoudreauRA, GriecoRL, CahoonSL,RobertsonRC, WedelRJ(2006)The pandemic from within:
Two surveys of physician burnout in Canada. Can J Community Ment Health 25:71-88.
doi: 10.7870/cjcmh-2006-0014
23
Cartwright M, Wardle J, Steggles N, Simon AE, Croker H, Jarvis MJ
(2003)Stressanddietarypracticesinadolescents. Health Psychol 22:362-369.
doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.362
Castelo-Branco C, Figueras F, Eixarch E, Quereda F, Cancelo MJ, Gonzales S, Balsch, J (2007)
Stress symptoms and burnout in obstetric and gynaecology residents. BJOG: An
International Journal of Obstertrics&Gynaecology, 114:94-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-
0528.2006.01155.x
ChayuT, KreitlerS(2011)Burnout in nephrology nurses in Israel.NephrolNurs J 38:65-77.
CunradiCB, Chen M-J, LiptonR(2009)Association of occupational and substance use factors
with burnout among urban transit operators.J Urban Health 86:562-
570.doi:10.1186/1747-597X-2-36
Demerouti E, Bakker AB (2008) TheOldenburgBurnoutInventory: A
goodalternativetomeasureburnoutandengagement. In J. Halbesleben (Ed.),
Stressandburnoutinhealthcare. NovaSciences.
Demerouti E, Bakker AB (2011) The Job Demands– Resources model: Challenges for future
research. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology,37:1-9.
Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli WB (2001)The job demands-resourcesmodel
of burnout. J ApplPsychol 86:499-512. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Vardakou, I., &Kantas, A.(2003).
Theconvergentvalidityoftwoburnoutinstruments: A multitrait-
multimethodanalysis.EuropeanJournalofPsychologicalAssessment, 19,12–23.
Demir A, Ulusoy M, Ulusoy MF (2003) Investigation of factors influencing burnout levels in the
professional and private lives of nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40,
807-827.
Dreano-Hartz S, Rhondali W, Ledoux M, Ruer M, Berthiller J, Schott AM, Monsarrat L, Filbet
M (2015) Burnout among physicians in palliative care: Impact of clinical settings. Palliat
Support Care, 14:1-9.
EmbriacoN, PapazianL, Kentish-BarnesN, PochardF, AzoulayE(2007)Burnout syndrome among
critical care healthcare workers. CurrOpinCrit Care 13:482-488.
Estryn-Behar M, vanderHeijdenB, Ogińska H,Camerino D, LeNézet O, Conway PM, Fry
C,Hasselhorn HM (2007) Theimpactofsocialworkenvironment, teamworkcharacteristics,
24
burnout, andpersonalfactorsuponintenttoleaveamongEuropeannurses. Medical Care,
45:939-950.
Estryn-Behar M, vanderHeijdenB, Camerino D, Fry C,LeNézet O, Conway PM, Hasselhorn HM,
the NEXT study group (2008)Violence risks in nursing – results from the European
‘NEXT’ study. Occup Med 58:107-114. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm142
FieS, NormanIJ, WhileAE (2013)The relationship between physicians’ and nurses’ personal
physical activity habits and their health-promotion practice: A systematic review. Health
Educ J 72:102-119.doi:10.1177/0017896911430763
Golar SK (2011)Useandunderstandingofanalgesics (painkillers)byAstonuniversitystudents.
Bioscience Horizons 4:71-78. doi:10.1093/biohorizons/hzr009
GoldbergR, BossRW, ChanL, GoldbergJ, MallonWK, MoradzadehD et al (1996)Burnout and its
correlates in emergency physicians: Four years' experience with a wellness booth.
AcadEmerg Med 3:1156-1164.doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03379.x
GorterRC, EijkmanMAJ, HoogstratenJ(2000)Burnout and health among Dutch dentists. Eur J
Oral Sci 108:261-267.doi:10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000
GrassiL, MagnaniK(2000)Psychiatric morbidity and burnout in the medical profession: An
Italian study of general practitioners and hospital physicians. PsychoterPsychosom
69:329-334.doi:10.1159/000012416
Green DE, Walkey FH, Taylor AJ (1991)The three-factor structure of the MaslachBurnout
Inventory: A multicultural, multinational confirmatory study.J SocBehavPers 6:453-472.
Harkness JA (2003) Questionnaire translation. In: Harkness JA, van de Vijver F,Mohler, P
(eds)Cross-cultural survey methods. John Wiley and Sons,New York,pp 35–56
JovanovicN, BeezholdJ, AndlauerO, KuzmanMR, PodlesekA, HanonC, SchulzeB(2009)Burnout
among psychiatry residents: The International Psychiatry Resident/Trainee Burnout
Syndrome Study (BoSS). Die Psychiat 6:75-79.
Kanai-PakM, AikenLH, SloaneDM, PoghosyanL(2008)Poor work environments and nurse
inexperience are associated with burnout, job dissatisfaction and quality deficits in
Japanese hospitals. J ClinNurs 17:3324-3332.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02639.x
Kandiah J,YakeM, JonesJ, MeyerM(2006)Stress influences appetite and comfort food
preferences in college women. Nutr Res 26:118-123.doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2005.11.010
25
Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E, et al. (2005) The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: a new
tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress;19(3):192-207.doi:
10.1080/02678370500297720
Maroco J, MarocoAL, Leite E, Bastos C, Vazao MJ, Campos J (2016) Burnout in Portuguese
healthcare professionals: An analysis at the national level. Acta Med Port, 29:24-30.
MaslachC, JacksonSE, LeiterMP(1996)MBI: The Maslach Burnout Inventory:
Manual.Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto
MaslachC, SchaufeliWB, LeiterMP(2001)Job Burnout.Annu Rev Psychol 52:397-
422.doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
McDonaldT, SiegallM(2004) Burnout and expectancies about alcohol use: Drinking behavior in
a sample of university professors.
B>Questhttp://www.westga.edu/~bquest/2004/burnout.htmAccessed on 20 October 2014
Melamed, S., Kushnir, T., Shirom, A. (1992) Burnout and risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
Behav Med 18:53-60.doi:10.1080/08964289.1992.9935172
MelamedS, ShiromA, TokerS, BerlinerS, ShapiraI(2006) Burnout and risk of cardiovascular
disease: Evidence, possible causal paths, and promising research directions. PsycholB
132:327-353.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.327
Mikolajczyk, R. T., El Ansari, W., Maxwell, A.E. (2009)Food consumption frequency and
perceived stress and depressive symptoms among students in three European countries.
Nutr J 8:31.doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-31
MontgomeryAJ, BradleyC, RochfortA, PanagopoulouE(2011)A review of self-medication in
physicians and medical students. Occup Med 61:490-497.doi:10.1093/occmed/kqr098
MontgomeryAJ, PanagopoulouE, KehoeI, ValkanosE(2011)Connecting organisational culture
and quality of care in the hospital: is job burnout the missing link?J Health Organ
Manag25:108-123.doi:10.1108/14777261111116851
MoustouI, PanagopoulouE, MontgomeryAJ, BenosA(2010)Burnout predicts health behaviors in
ambulance workers. Open Occup Health & Safety J 2:16-18.
Naveed S, Ghayas S, Jawed A, Kanwal F, Mohiuddin B, Sabeen E, Sabuhi B
(2014)Unnecessaryuseofpainkillerindifferentagegroups.DHRInt J Med Sci 5:89-95.
26
Nella D, Panagopoulou E, Galanis N, Montgomery A, Benos A (2015) Consequences of job
insecurity on the psychological and physical health of Greek civil servants.BioMed Res
Int,Article ID 673623. doi: 10.1155/2015/673623
NevanperaNJ, HopsuL, KuosmaE, UkkolaO, UittiJ, LaitinenJH(2012) Occupational burnout,
eating behavior, and weight among working women. Am J ClinNutr95:934-
943.doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.014191
O’Connor DB, Jones F, Conner M, McMillan B, Ferguson E
(2008)Effectsofdailyhasslesandeatingstyleoneatingbehavior. Health Psychol 27Suppl
1:S20–S31.doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.S20
OdegaardAO, Koh WP, Yuan JM, Gross MD, Pereira MA (2012)Western-
stylefastfoodintakeandcardiometabolicriskinanEasterncountry. Circulation, 126:182-188.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084004
OreskovichMR, KaupsKL, BalchCM, HanksJB, SateleD, SloanJ et al(2012)Prevalence of
alcohol use disorders among American surgeons. Arch Surg 147:168-174.
doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.1481
PanagopoulouE, MontgomeryAJ, BenosA(2006)Burnout in internal medicine physicians:
Differences between residents and specialists.Eur J Int Med 17:195-
200.doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2005.11.013
ParkCL, IacoccaMO(2014)A stress and coping perspective on health behaviors: theoretical and
methodological considerations. Anxiety Stress Copin 27:123-
137.doi:10.1080/10615806.2013.860969
PetersonU, DemeroutiE, BergstromG, SamuelssonM, AsbergM, NygrenA(2008)Burnout and
physical and mental health among Swedish healthcare workers. J AdvNurs 62:84-
95.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04580.x
Pines AM, Aronson E (1988)Careerburnout: Causesandcures. FreePress, New York.
PipeA, SorensenM, ReidR(2009)Physician smoking status, attitudes toward smoking, and
cessation advice to patients: An international survey. Patient EducCouns74:118-
123.doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.042
PoghosyanL, ClarkeSP, FinlaysonM, AikenLH(2010)Nurse burnout and quality of care: Cross-
national investigation in six countries. Res Nurs Health 33:288–
298.doi:10.1002/nur.20383
27
PopaF, RaedA, PurcareaVL, LalaA, BobirnacG(2010)Occupational burnout levels in emergency
medicine–a nationwide study and analysis. J Med Life 3:207-215.
PrinsJT, Hoekstra-WeebersJ, Gazendam-DonofrioSM,DillinghGS, BakkerAB, HuismanMet
al(2010)Burnout and engagement among resident doctors in the Netherlands: a national
study. Med Educ 44:236-247.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03590.x
PutnikK, HoukesI(2011)Work related characteristics, work-home and home-work interference
and burnout among primary healthcare physicians: A gender perspective in a Serbian
context. BMC Public Health 11:716.doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-716
Qiao H, Scaufeli, WB (2011) Theconvergentvalidityoffourburnoutmeasuresin a Chinesesample:
A confirmatoryfactor-analyticapproach. Applied Psychology: An International Review,
60 (1), 87-111.
Ramsted M (2001) Alcohol and suicide in 14 European countries.Addiction 96Suppl 1:S59-
75.doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.96.1s1.6.x
SchaufeliWB(2003)Past performance and future perspectives on burnout research. SA J
IndPsychol 29:1-15.doi:10.4102/sajip.v29i4.127
SchaufeliWB, BuunkBP(2003)Burnout: An overview of 25 years of research and theorizing.
In:Schabracq MJ, Winnubst JAM, Cooper CL (eds)The handbook of work and health
psychology. Wiley,Chichester, pp 383–425
Schaufeli WB, JanczurB(1994)Burnout among nurses: A Polish-Dutch comparison.J Cross-Cult
Psychol25:95-113.doi:10.1177/0022022194251006
SchaufeliWB, LeiterMP, MaslachC(2009)Burnout: 35 years of research and practice.Career Dev
Int 14:204-220.doi:10.1108/13620430910966406
Schulz M, Damkroger A, Heins C, Wehlitz L, Lohr M, Driessen M, Behrens J, Wingenfeld K
(2009)Effort-reward imbalance and burnout among German nurses in medical compared
with psychiatric hospital settings.J PsychiatrMent Health Nurs, 16:225-233. doi:
10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.01355.x.
ShanafeltTD, BooneS, TanL, DyrbyeLN, SotileW, SateleD et al (2012)Burnout and satisfaction
with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population.Arch
Intern Med 172:1377-1385.doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3199
28
ShanafeltTD, Oreskovich MR, Dyrbye LN, Satele DV, Hanks JB, Sloan JA, Balch CM (2012)
Avoiding burnout: the personal health habits and wellness practices of US surgeons. Ann
Surg 255:625-633. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b2fa0
SharmaA, SharpDM, WalkerLG, MonsonJRT(2008)Stress and burnout in colorectal and
vascular surgical consultants working in the UK National Health Service. Psycho-Oncol
17:570-576.
Shirom A (2010a) Employee burnout and health: Current knowledge and future research paths.
In:Houdmont J,LekaS (eds)Contemporary occupational health psychology, vol 1.Wiley,
Chichester, pp 59–77
ShiromA(2010b)Feeling energetic at work: On vigor’s antecedents. In: Bakker AB, Leiter MP
(eds)Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research.Psychology Press,
Hove, pp 69–84
Shirom, A., &Melamed, S. (2006). A
comparisonoftheconstructvalidityoftwoburnoutmeasuresamongtwogroupsofprofessionals.
International JournalofStressManagement,13, 176–200.
ShiromA, MelamedS, TokerS, BerlinerS, ShapiraI(2005)Burnout, mental and physical health: A
review of the evidence and a proposed explanatory model. Int Rev Ind Organ
Psychol20:269-309.
SoaresJJF, GrossiG, SundinO(2007)Burnout among women: Associations with
demographic/socio-economic, work, life-style and health factors. Arch Women’s Ment
Health 10:61-71.doi:10.1007/s00737-007-0170-3
SolerJK, YamanH, EstevaM, DoddsF, SpiridonovaAsenovaR, KaticM et al; European General
Practice Research Network Burnout Study Group(2008)Burnout in European family
doctors: the EGPRN study. Fam Pract 25:245-265.doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn038
Steptoe A, Lipsey Z, Wardle J (1998)Stress,
hasslesandvariationsinalcoholconsumption,foodchoiceandphysicalexercise: A diarystudy.
BritJ Health Psych 3:51-63.doi:10.1111/j.2044-8287.1998.tb00555.x
Swetz KM, Harrington SE, Matsuyama RK, ShanafeltTD, Lyckholm LJ (2009)Strategies for
avoiding burnout in hospice and palliative medicine: Peer advice for physicians on
achieving longevity and fulfillment. J Palliat Med 12:773-
777.doi:10.1089/jpm.2009.0050
29
TironiMOS, SobrinhoCLN, de Souza BarrosD, ReisEJFB, FilhoESM, AlmeidaA et al
(2010)Professional burnout syndrome among intensive care physicians in Salvador,
Brazil. Brazil Rev Assoc Med Bras56:656-662.doi:10.1590/S0104-42302009000600009
Tsiga E, Panagopoulou E, Niakas D (in press) Health promotionacross occupational groups: One
size doesn’t fit all. Occup Med-c
TurnipseedDL, TurnipseedPH(1997)A bi-cultural analysis of the costs of caring: nursing burnout
in the United States and the Philippines.Career Dev Int 2:180-
188.doi:10.1108/13620439710173670
Weight CJ, Sellon JL, Lessard-Anderson CR, Shanafelt TD, Olsen KD, Laskowski ER
(2013)Physical activity, quality of life, and burnout among physician trainees: The effect
of a team-based, incentivized exercise program. Mayo Clin Proc 88:1435–
1442.doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.09.010
WinwoodPC, WinefieldAH, LushingtonK(2003)The role of occupational stress in the
maladaptive use of alcohol by dentists: A study of South Australian general dental
practitioners. Aust Dent J 48:102-109.doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2003.tb00017.x
WHO (2014)Global status report on alcohol and health.WHO Press, Geneva
WHO (2010)Global recommendations on physical activity for health.WHO Press, Geneva
WHO (2009)Alcohol: Country profiles: Turkey.
http://ec.europa.eu/health/alcohol/policy/country_profiles/turkey_country_profile.pdfAcc
essed on 20 October 2014
ZhuDQ, NormanIJ, WhileAE (2011)The relationship between doctors’ and nurses’ own weight
status and their weight management practices: A systematic review. Obes Rev 12:459-
469. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00821.x
Zis P, Anagnostopoulos F, Sykioti, P (2014) Burnout in medical residents: A study based on the
Job Demands-Resources model. The Scientific World Journal, article ID 673279, 10
pages. doi: 10.1155/2014/673279
30
Table 1. Sample description - health professionals from sevenSouth and South Eastern European countries
Greece Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia All
N (%) 594 (22.6) 249 (9.5) 394 (15.0) 411 (15.7) 496 (18.9) 193 (7.4) 286 (10.9) 2623 (100)
Age range Mean SD
19-66
39.6
8.89
23-62
35.2
10.64
22-68
43.3
10.82
23-64
36.8
9.15
22-66
35.3
8.76
20-65
43.9
11.28
20-63
38.1
10.85
19-68
38.7
10.18
Gender Male – N (%) Female – N (%)
198 (33.4)
395 (66.6)
37 (14.9)
212(85.1)
98 (25.9)
280(74.1)
65 (15.9)
343(84.1)
118 (23.8)
378(76.2)
40 (20.7)
153(79.3)
80 (28.2)
204(71.8)
636 (24.5)
1965 (75.5)
Staff position Doctor – N (%) Nurse – N (%) Resident - N(%)
123 (20.7)
280 (47.1)
191 (32.2)
69 (27.7)
167(67.1)
13 (5.2)
140 (35.5)
197(50.0)
57 (14.5)
87 (21.2)
205(49.9)
119 (29.0)
77 (15.5)
301(60.7)
118 (23.8)
60 (31.1)
133(68.9)
0 (0)
71 (24.8)
148(51.7)
67 (23.4)
627 (23.9)
1431 (54.6)
565 (21.5)
Unit tenure range Mean SD
1m – 35y 6y 4m 7y 2m
1y – 36y 8y 7m 8y 3m
1m – 40y 9y 9m
10y 3m
1m – 37y 7y 11m 7y 11m
1y – 42y 8y 5m 8y 1m
6m - 45y 9m 17y 11m 11y 4m
1m – 35y 8y 9m 9y 0m
1m - 45y 9m 8y 10m 9y 0m
31
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and health behaviors in
health professionals from 7 South and South Eastern European countries
Greece Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia All
EE Mean (SD)
22.71
(11.55)
16.82(9.53)
21.33
(12.97)
15.61
(10.80)
27.88
(12.88)
17.49
(10.80)
15.89
(11.79)
20.68
(12.52)
Low Average High
26.3%
34.7%
39.1%
48.2%
36.9%
14.9%
35.8%
28.7%
35.5%
54.0%
29.2%
16.8%
17.9%
28.2%
53.8%
44.0%
34.7%
21.2%
50.3%
31.8%
17.8%
36.5%
31.6%
31.9%
DP Mean (SD)
6.95
(5.73)
3.99
(4.44)
4.22
(5.39)
3.98
(4.71)
9.99
(7.71)
3.88
(4.33)
2.94 (4.49)
5.71
(6.16)
Low Average High
25.8%
31.0%
43.3%
47.8%
30.1%
22.1%
53.8%
23.9%
22.3%
51.3%
25.1%
23.6%
20.2%
21.0%
58.9%
51.8%
29.5%
18.7%
65.7%
17.8%
16.4%
41.3%
25.5%
33.2%
EE & DP High
26.4%
9.2%
15.2%
9.7%
45.2%
8.8%
9.1%
20.9%
Fast food Mean (SD)
3.57
(2.65)
0.95
(1.50)
3.80
(2.52)
1.02
(1.63)
2.44
(2.40)
1.01
(1.40)
2.28
(1.63)
2.41
(2.43)
Exercise Mean (SD)
1.26
(1.72)
1.20
(1.59)
1.47
(1.88)
1.83
(2.08)
1.38
(1.89)
1.30
(2.01)
1.69
(1.97)
1.45
(1.89)
Alcohol Mean (SD)
1.22
(1.35)
1.04
(1.79)
1.47
(1.70)
0.67
(1.07)
0.87
(1.23)
0.56
(1.13)
0.70
(1.32)
0.98
(1.41)
Painkillers Mean (SD)
0.97
(1.40)
0.81
(1.70)
0.82
(1.53)
0.78
(1.29)
2.03
(1.75)
0.87
(1.31)
0.91
(1.50)
1.03
(1.54)
Tertiles of burnout dimensions: EE: high ≥ 26, low ≤ 14; DP: high ≥ 7, low ≤ 2.
32
Table 3. Hierarchicalregression of the relation betweenemotional exhaustion and health behaviours in health professionals – overall sample
b SE β t F R2 ∆ R2
Fa
st
foo
d
Model 1 EE
Model 2 EE Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure
Model 3 EE Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia
0.03
0.03 - 0.00 - 0.54 - 0.42 - 0.00
0.01 - 0.04 - 0.24 - 0.40 0.00 - 2.64 0.52 - 2.53 - 1.41 - 2.28 - 1.22
0.00
0.00 0.01 0.13 0.12 0.00
0.00 0.01 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.23 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.19 0.16
0.14***
0.14***
- 0.01 - 0.10*** - 0.09*** - 0.12***
0.07**
- 0.19*** - 0.04*
- 0.08*** 0.03
- 0.24*** 0.07**
- 0.39*** - 0.23*** - 0.26*** - 0.16***
6.65
6.92 - 0.40 - 4.06 - 3.60 - 4.32
3.36 - 6.90 - 1.99 - 3.77 1.22
- 11.52 3.35
- 16.72 - 9.79
- 11.76 - 7.45
44.18***
30.43***
65.88***
0.02
0.07
0.25
0.02***
0.05***
0.18***
Exe
rcis
e
Model 1 EE
Model 2 EE Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure
Model 3 EE Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia
- 0.03
- 0.03 0.00 - 0.42 0.01 0.00
- 0.03 0.00 - 0.47 0.06 0.00 - 0.15 0.23 0.44 0.28 - 0.09 0.28
0.00
0.00 0.01 0.10 0.09 0.00
0.00 0.01 0.11 0.09 0.00 0.20 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.14
- 0.17***
- 0.17***
- 0.01 - 0.10***
0.00 0.03
- 0.17**
0.00 - 0.11***
0.02 0.02 - 0.02 0.04
0.09** 0.06* - 0.01 0.05*
- 8.16
- 8.16 - 0.50 - 3.99 0.13 0.25
- 7.46 - 0.01 - 4.43 0.62 0.69 - 0.76 1.70 3.36 2.18 - 0.53 2.00
70.64***
18.26***
10.30***
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03***
0.01***
0.01**
Alc
oh
ol
Model 1 EE
Model 2 EE Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure
Model 3 EE Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia
0.01
0.01 0.02 - 0.64 - 0.36 - 0.00
0.01 0.01 - 0.59 - 0.36 0.00 - 0.19 0.27 - 0.40 - 0.26 - 0.54 - 0.42
0.00
0.00 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.10
0.06**
0.08*** 0.11*** - 0.20*** - 0.13***
- 0.04
0.05* 0.04
- 0.19*** - 0.13***
0.03 - 0.03
0.07** - 0.11*** - 0.07**
- 0.11*** - 0.10***
2.90
3.73 4.03 - 8.86 - 5.73 - 1.45
2.23 1.45 - 8.28 - 5.77 1.01 - 1.43 3.04 - 4.44 - 2.97 - 4.71 - 4.39
8.40**
48.49***
29.93***
0.00
0.10
0.13
0.00**
0.10***
0.03***
33
Pa
inkill
ers
Model 1 EE
Model 2 EE Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure
Model 3 EE Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia
0.03
0.03 0.00 0.38 0.08 0.00
0.02 0.01 0.41 0.05 0.00 - 0.13 - 0.21 - 0.10 0.81 - 0.12 0.07
0.00
0.00 0.00 0.08 0.07 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.16 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.11
0.26***
0.25***
0.01 0.11***
0.03 0.04
0.19***
0.05 0.12***
0.02 0.02 - 0.02
- 0.05* - 0.02
0.19*** - 0.02 0.02
12.21
12.03 0.19 4.59 1.14 1.44
8.68 1.84 4.97 0.73 0.54 - 0.81 - 2.00 - 0.95 7.51 - 0.93 0.60
148.99***
38.46***
26.60***
0.07
0.09
0.12
0.07***
0.02***
0.04***
EE, age and unit tenure are included as continuous variables. Dichotomous categorical variables are coded as: gender (man = 0, woman = 1), staff position (doctor/resident = 0, nurse = 1). Categorical variable with 7 levels country is dummy coded with Greece being the reference category. Constant is included. b – unstandardized regression coefficient; SE – standard error of the regression coefficient; β – standardized regression coefficient; t –test of each predictor’s significance; F –test of overall model’s significance; R2– coefficient of determination (proportion of explained variance), ∆ R2 - R Square Change. Levels of statistical significance:***p<0.001; **p<0.01; *p<0.05.
34
Table 4. Hierarchicalregression of the relation betweendepersonalization and health behaviours in
health professionals – overall sample
b SE β t F R2 ∆ R2
Fa
st
foo
d
Model 1 DP
Model 2 DP Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure
Model 3 DP Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia
0.07
0.06 0.00 - 0.49 - 0.38 - 0.00
0.05 - 0.04 - 0.22 - 0.40 0.00 - 2.67 0.60 - 2.49 - 1.48 - 2.37 - 1.12
0.01
0.01 0.01 0.13 0.12 0.00
0.01 0.01 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.23 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.19 0.16
0.16***
0.14***
0.00 - 0.09*** - 0.08**
- 0.12***
0.12*** - 0.18*** - 0.07**
- 0.08*** 0.04
- 0.24*** 0.09*** - 0.38*** - 0.24*** - 0.26*** - 0.15***
7.80
6.83 0.14 - 3.71 - 3.22 - 4.32
5.92 - 6.62 - 3.34 - 3.77 1.31
- 11.80 3.91
- 16.65 - 10.27 - 11.62 - 6.88
60.83***
30.17***
68.74***
0.03
0.06
0.26
0.03***
0.04***
0.19***
Exe
rcis
e
Model 1 DP
Model 2 DP Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure
Model 3 DP Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia
- 0.04
- 0.04 - 0.01 - 0.46 - 0.02 0.00
- 0.03 - 0.00 - 0.52 0.03 0.00 - 0.02 0.19 0.53 0.26 - 0.04 0.33
0.01
0.01 0.01 0.11 0.09 0.00
0.01 0.01 0.11 0.09 0.00 0.20 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.14
- 0.12***
- 0.12***
- 0.03 - 0.11***
- 0.01 0.03
- 0.11**
- 0.01 - 0.12***
0.01 0.02 - 0.00 0.04
0.10*** 0.05* - 0.01 0.06*
- 5.54
- 5.73 - 0.96 - 4.41 - 0.21 0.94
- 4.83 - 0.23 - 4.93 0.32 0.64 - 0.09 1.42 4.02 2.03 - 0.21 2.28
30.66***
11.45***
7.30***
0.01
0.03
0.04
0.01***
0.01***
0.01**
Alc
oh
ol
Model 1 DP
Model 2 DP Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure
Model 3 DP Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia
0.03
0.02 0.02 - 0.62 - 0.35 0.00
0.02 0.01 - 0.59 - 0.34 0.00 - 0.20 0.32 - 0.37 - 0.30 - 0.51 - 0.37
0.01
0.01 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.00
0.01 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.10
0.12***
0.11*** 0.12*** - 0.20*** - 0.13***
- 0.04
0.10*** 0.05
- 0.19*** - 0.13***
0.03 - 0.03
0.08*** - 0.10*** - 0.08**
- 0.11*** - 0.09***
5.45
5.29 4.41 - 8.65 - 5.46 - 1.39
4.67 1.67 - 8.24 - 5.42 1.09 - 1.46 3.54 - 4.13 - 3.38 - 4.47 - 3.80
29.66***
51.60***
31.69***
0.01
0.11
0.14
0.01***
0.09***
0.03***
35
Pa
inkill
ers
Model 1 DP
Model 2 DP Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure
Model 3 DP Age Gender Staff position Unit tenure Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia
0.05
0.05 0.00 0.44 0.12 0.00
0.03 0.01 0.46 0.08 0.00 - 0.25 - 0.17 - 0.18 0.85 - 0.17 0.03
0.01
0.01 0.00 0.09 0.07 0.00
0.01 0.00 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.16 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.11
0.19***
0.20***
0.03 0.12***
0.04 0.04
0.13*** 0.06*
0.13*** 0.03 0.02 - 0.04 - 0.04 - 0.04
0.20*** - 0.03 0.01
8.66
9.35 0.86 5.20 1.64 1.41
5.58 2.05 5.55 1.07 0.64 - 1.60 - 1.61 - 1.71 7.78 - 1.31 0.26
74.91***
26.78***
22.17***
0.04
0.06
0.11
0.04***
0.03***
0.05***
DP, age and unit tenure are included as continuous variables. Dichotomous categorical variables are coded as: gender (man = 0, woman = 1), staff position (doctor/resident = 0, nurse = 1). Categorical variable with 7 levels country is dummy coded with Greece being the reference category. Constant is included. b – unstandardized regression coefficient; SE – standard error of the regression coefficient; β – standardized regression coefficient; t – test of each predictor’s significance; F –test of overall model’s significance; R2 – coefficient of determination (proportion of explained variance), ∆ R2 - R Square Change. Levels of statistical significance:***p<0.001; **p<0.01; *p<0.05.
36
Table 5. Regression models of the association betweenemotional exhaustion and depersonalization and health behaviours in health professionals from sevenSouth and South Eastern European
countries
Greece Portugal Bulgaria Romania Turkey Croatia Macedonia
EE
β 0.05 - 0.09 0.07 - 0.01 0.18*** 0.02 0.01
R2 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00
F 1.24 0.81 1.40 0.01 13.69*** 0.09 0.02
DP
β 0.16*** 0.07 0.12* 0.08 0.25** - 0.11 0.06
R2 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.00
Fa
st f
oo
d
F 13.90*** 0.49 4.23* 2.19 29.46*** 2.18 0.91
EE
β - 0.17*** - 0.26** - 0.19** - 0.13** - 0.25*** - 0.07 - 0.09
R2 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.01
F 17.57*** 8.18** 11.12** 5.96** 26.52*** 0.91 2.39
DP
β - 0.09* - 0.09 - 0.06 - 0.14** - 0.17*** - 0.01 - 0.05
R2 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.00
Exe
rcis
e
F 4.63* 0.87 1.16 6.79** 12.36*** 0.04 0.61
EE
β - 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.14** 0.03 - 0.01 0.04
R2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
F 1.03 0.18 0.48 7.49** 0.32 0.01 0.49
DP
β 0.08 - 0.06 0.15** 0.21*** 0.12* - 0.04 0.15*
R2 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.02
Alc
oh
ol
F 3.20 0.43 6.75** 17.12*** 5.91* 0.33 5.87*
EE
β 0.24*** - 0.05 0.15** 0.23*** 0.26*** 0.17* 0.14*
R2 0.06 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.02
F 32.52*** 0.26 7.00** 21.19*** 21.50*** 5.76* 5.28*
DP
β 0.06 - 0.07 0.10 0.07 0.26*** 0.14 0.04
R2 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.02 0.00
Pa
ink
ille
rs
F 1.77 0.45 3.13 1.70 21.50*** 3.67 0.46
Only results from the linear regression models including emotional exhaustion or depersonalization as thesingle predictor variable (Model 1) are presented here. Constant is included.
Levels of statistical significance:***p<0.001; **p<0.01; *p<0.05.
37