business economicsdcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/business-economics-ii.pdf7. slope of demand...
TRANSCRIPT
Business Economics
Unit 1
Perfect Competition
Meaning Market Status
When Every producer and consumer is free to sell or buy and the contact between them is such that the prices come to equality, quickly and easily.
Perfect competition is a market structure featured by a large number of buyers and sellers of an identical products.
Competition is considered a healthy sign in consumption, production , distribution and also in the exchange.
The consumer have freedom of choice and subject
Definitions
According to Boulding—”A Perfect Competition
market may be defined as a large number of buyers
and sellers all engaged in the purchase and sale of
identically similar commodities, who are in close
contact with one another and who buy and sell
freely among themselves.”
“A market is said to be perfect when all
the potential buyers and sellers are
promptly aware of the prices at which
the transaction take place. Under such
conditions the price of the commodity
will tend to be equal everywhere.”
“A Perfect Competition market is that type
of market in which the number of buyers
and sellers is very large, all are engaged in
buying and selling a homogeneous
product without any artificial restrictions
and possessing perfect knowledge of the
market at a time.”
Characteristics of perfect competition 1. Large Number of Buyers and Sellers:
The first condition is that the number of
buyers and sellers must be so large that
none of them individually is in a position
to influence the price and output of the
industry as a whole. In the market the
position of a purchaser or a seller is just
like a drop of water in an ocean.
2. Homogeneity of the Product:
Each firm should produce and sell a
homogeneous product so that no buyer
has any preference for the product of any
individual seller over others. If goods will
be homogeneous then price will also be
uniform everywhere.
3. Free Entry and Exit of Firms:
The firm should be free to enter or leave
the firm. If there is hope of profit the firm
will enter in business and if there is
profitability of loss, the firm will leave the
business.
4. Perfect Knowledge of the Market:
Buyers and sellers must possess complete
knowledge about the prices at which goods
are being bought and sold and of the prices
at which others are prepared to buy and
sell. This will help in having uniformity in
prices.
5. Same Price for Commodity 6. Heterogeneity of factors:
Characteristics of perfect competition 7. Perfect Mobility of the Factors of
Production and Goods: There should be
perfect mobility of goods and factors
between industries. Goods should be free
to move to those places where they can
fetch the highest price.
8. Absence of Price Control & Govt.
Intervention: There should be complete
openness in buying and selling of goods.
Here prices are liable to change freely in
response to demand and supply
conditions.
9. Perfect Competition among Buyers and
Sellers: In this purchasers and sellers have
got complete freedom for bargaining, no
restrictions in charging more or demanding
less, competition feeling must be present
there.
10. Absence of Transport Cost:
There must be absence of transport cost.
In having less or negligible transport cost
will help complete market in maintaining
uniformity in price.
11. Independent Relationship between Buyers and Sellers:
There should not be any attachment between sellers and purchasers in the
market. Here, the seller should not show prick and choose method in
accepting the price of the commodity. If we will see from the close we will find
that in real life “Perfect Competition is a pure myth.”
Equilibrium of Firm (Long Run)
Y
X
TR
TC
R
P
Q
M O M1
T
C
&
T
R
OUTPUT
•TR-TC = Profit
•Profit is maximum at ‘PQ’
•Profit goes on increasing till the
point ‘P’
•From the point ‘P’ profit starts
declining
•Firms equilibrium is at the point ‘R’
•After equilibrium, firm becomes in
loss
Equilibrium of Firm (Long Run)
Short Run Equilibrium
Price & Output Determination
Y
X
D=AR=MR
MC
AC
0
P
Q
P
R
I
C
E
OUT PUT
Super Normal Profit
E
• 0Q is the maximum
profitable output
•Beyond this point,
production is not profitable
because cost becomes more
than price
•As price is equal in this
market, AR and MR are
same.
•At quantity 0Q price is 0P
and AC is 0P0, firm earns
super normal profit
P0
Short Run Equilibrium
Price & Output Determination
• 0Q is the maximum
profitable output
•Beyond this point,
production is not profitable
because cost becomes more
than price
•As price is equal in this
market, AR and MR are
same.
•At quantity 0Q price is 0P
and AC is 0P1, firm faces
loss.
Y
X
D=AR=MR
MC AC
0
P
Q
P
R
I
C
E
OUT PUT
LOSS
E P1
Short Run Equilibrium
Price & Output Determination
Y
X
D=AR=MR
MC
AC
0
P
Q
P
R
I
C
E
OUT PUT
Normal Profit
• 0Q is the maximum
profitable output
•Beyond this point,
production is not profitable
because cost becomes more
than price
•As price is equal in this
market, AR and MR are
same.
•At quantity 0Q price is 0P
and AC is also 0P, firm earns
normal profit because AC
includes normal profit
Price Fixation
Buyers
Sellers
25 50 75 100
25 50 75 100
Range of Mutual
Benefit
P
r
i
c
e
Demand & Supply
Y
X C M N P O
T
S
D
P
A
B
Q
Super Normal Profit
Normal Profit
Loss
Business Economics
Unit 2
Monopoly
Monopoly is a Greek word which means single seller
Monos - Single
Polus - Seller
Market Status
Complete control over the supply by producer or seller
It does not mean the absence of competition
Commodity has no near or remote substitute (Motor car & Bicycle)
Hence other producers may not be able to compete
Definition
“Monopoly means the control of a
producer or group of producers over the
supply of a commodity, which has no
near or remote substitute and that these
is always a threat of entry by the small
sellers and the interference by the
government.”
Definition
“A market structure characterized by a
single seller, selling a unique product in
the market. In a monopoly market, the
seller faces no competition, as he is the
sole seller of goods with no close
substitute. He enjoys the power of
setting the price for his goods.”
Features or Characteristics of Monopoly
Single producer or seller
Absence of competition
No close substitute
Zero cross elasticity of demand
Control over the supply by producer
No distinction between firm and industry
Pure monopoly is found in developing economies not in
developed economies
Features or Characteristics of Monopoly
Downward sloping demand curve
Monopolist is a price maker
Seller can either decide price or quantities to be sold
Monopolist can prevent entry of new firms in the long
run
Restriction on entry and exit
Price discrimination
Price Discrimination
Under Price Competition AR = MR, where-as under
Monopoly MR < AR.
Under perfect competition price is determined by the
interaction of total demand and supply. This price is
acceptable to all the firms in the industry.
Under Monopoly, to sell every additional unit of the
commodity price will have to be lower.
Price Discrimination
In the words of Dooley, “Discriminatory
monopoly means charging different rates from
different customers for the same good or service.”
According to J.S. Bains, “Price discrimination refers
strictly to the practice by a seller to charging
different prices from different buyers for the same
good.”
Types of Price Discrimination
I. Personal
Refers to price discrimination when different prices are charged from different
individuals. The different prices are charged according to the level of income of
consumers as well as their willingness to purchase a product. For example, a doctor
charges different fees from poor and rich patients.
II. Geographical
Refers to price discrimination when the monopolist charges different prices at different
places for the same product. This type of discrimination is also called dumping.
III. On the basis of use
Occurs when different prices are charged according to the use of a product. For
instance, an electricity supply board charges lower rates for domestic consumption of
electricity and higher rates for commercial consumption.
Degrees of Price Discrimination
Degrees of Price Discrimination
Degrees of Price Discrimination
I) First-degree Price Discrimination: Refers to a price
discrimination in which a monopolist charges the maximum
price that each buyer is willing to pay. This is also known as
perfect price discrimination as it involves maximum exploitation
of consumers. In this, consumers fail to enjoy any consumer
surplus. First degree is practiced by lawyers and doctors.
II) Second-degree Price Discrimination:
Refers to a price discrimination in which buyers are divided into
different groups and different prices are charged from these
groups depending upon what they are willing to pay. Railways
and airlines practice this type of price discrimination.
Degrees of Price Discrimination
III) Third-degree Price Discrimination: Refers to a price
discrimination in which the monopolist divides the entire
market into submarkets and different prices are charged in
each submarket. Therefore, third-degree price discrimination is
also termed as market segmentation.
Necessary conditions for price discrimination
Price Discrimination
Monopoly situation
Separate markets
Understandable product differentiation
Buyer’s illusion (watching movie)
Prevention of re-exchange of commodities
Non-transferability characteristics of commodity
Necessary conditions for price discrimination
Price Discrimination
Let go attitude of buyers
Legal sanction (Electricity for domestic and industrial purpose)
Ignorance of the consumers
Creating artificial difference (for Rich and Poor)
Geographical distance (Domestic and Foreign Buyers)
Monopoly Vs Perfect competition
1. Output and Price:
Under perfect competition price is equal to
marginal cost at the equilibrium output. While
under monopoly, the price is greater than
average cost. 2. Equilibrium:
Under perfect competition equilibrium is
possible only when MR = MC and MC cuts the
MR curve from below. But under simple
monopoly, equilibrium can be realized whether
marginal cost is rising, constant or falling. 3. Entry:
Under perfect competition, there exist no
restrictions on the entry or exit of firms into
the industry. Under simple monopoly, there
are strong barriers on the entry and exit of
firms. 4. Discrimination:
Under simple monopoly, a monopolist can
charge different prices from the different
groups of buyers. But, in the perfectly
competitive market, it is absent by definition.
Monopoly Vs Perfect competition
5. Profits:
The difference between price and marginal
cost under monopoly results in super-normal
profits to the monopolist. Under perfect
competition, a firm in the long run enjoys only
normal profits. 6. Supply Curve of Firm:
Under perfect competition, supply curve can be known. It
is so because all firms can sell desired quantity at the
prevailing price. Moreover, there is no price
discrimination. Under monopoly, supply curve cannot be
known. MC curve is not the supply curve of the
monopolist.
7. Slope of Demand Curve:
Under perfect competition, demand curve is perfectly elastic. It is
due to the existence of large number of firms. Price of the
product is determined by the industry and each firm has to accept
that price. On the other hand, under monopoly, average revenue
curve slopes downward. AR and MR curves are separate from
each other. Price is determined by the monopolist.
Monopoly Vs Perfect competition
8. Goals of Firms:
Under perfect competition and monopoly the
firm aims at to maximize its profits. The firm
which aims at to maximize its profits is known
as rational firm.
9. Comparison of Price:
Monopoly price is higher than perfect
competition price. In long period, under
perfect competition, price is equal to average
cost.
10. Comparison of Output:
Perfect competition output is higher than
monopoly price.
Monopoly Vs Perfect competition
Business Economics
Unit: 3
Monopolistic Competition
Meaning
• E.H. Chamberlin’s work was entitled “The Theory of
Monopolistic Competition” and Mrs. Robinson’s “The
Economics of Imperfect Competition”.
• Both economists challenged the concept of perfect
competition and monopoly as unrealistic and attempted to
present a new theory which is more realistic of the two new
approaches, the view of Chamberlin’s theory of monopolistic
competition received wide acclamation. Critics also regarded
Chamberlin’s contribution as novel and superior to that of
Mrs. Robinson’s. In fact the real credit goes to Chamberlin for
setting a new and realistic trend in the economics value.
Meaning
• Monopolistic competition is a form of imperfect market
• In this market situation, both elements of monopoly and competition are present
• In this market there are many sellers of a differentiated products
• In this market products are close substitutes but not perfect substitutes.
• Monopolistic Competition refers to the market situation in which
there is a keen competition, but neither perfect nor pure, among a
group of a large number of small producers or suppliers having some degree of monopoly because of the differentiation of their
products. Thus, we can say that monopolistic competition (or
imperfect competition) is a mixture of competition and a certain degree of monopoly, on the basis of a correct appraisal of the
market situation.
Definitions
1. Monopolistic Competition refers to competition among a large number of sellers producing close but not perfect substitutes for each other.
2. According to Prof. Lerner – “The condition of imperfect competition arises when a seller has to face the falling demand curve.”
3. According to Prof. J. K. Mehta – “It has been more fully realised that every case of exchange is a case of what may be called partial monopoly and partial monopoly is looked at from the other said a case of imperfect competition. There is a blending of both competition element and monopoly element in each situation.”
4. According to Prof. Leftwich – “Monopolistic Competition (or imperfect competition) is that condition of industrial market in which a particular commodity of one seller creates an idea of difference from that of the other sellers in the minds of the consumers.”
Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition
• Less Number of Buyers and Sellers: In this market neither buyers nor sellers are too many as
under perfect competition nor there is only one seller as under monopoly.
• Product Differentiation: Although the commodities produced by different producers can
serve as perfect substitutes to those produced by others, yet they are different in colour,
form, packing, design, name etc. So there is product differentiation in the market.
• Lack of Knowledge on the Part of Consumers: Neither consumers nor sellers have full
knowledge of market conditions, so there is international difference in the price of goods
from those of others.
• High Transportation Cost: Price discrimination Even though similar goods are there because
of different transport costs are bought and sold at different prices.
• Advertisement: Advertisement plays an important role because buyers are influenced to
prefer by advertisement, which plays upon their mind and makes them the product of one
firm to those of another.
Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition
• Ignorance of the Buyers: There are some people who think that high priced goods will be
better and of higher quality. So, they avoid buying low priced goods.
• Freedom on entry and exit
• Downward sloping demand curve
• Difference between firm and industry
• The seller is price maker as well as price taker
• Less mobility of factors of production
• Non-price competition
• Imaginary difference is created
Equilibrium of Firm
Equilibrium of Firm
Equilibrium of Firm
Difference Between Monopolistic competition and Perfect Competition
Difference Between Monopolistic competition and Perfect Competition
Business Economics
Unit: 4
Oligopoly
Meaning • Oligopoly refers to a market situation or a type of market in which a few firms
control the supply of a commodity. The competing firms are few in number but
each one is large enough so as to be able to control the total industry output.
However, increase of its output or sales will reduce the sales of rival firms by a
noticeable amount.
• This is surely the case if three to six or even ten firms control an industry’s output,
with each controlling enough to exert influence on price. Oligopoly is the most
prevalent form of market organisation in the manufacturing sector at modern
times and arises due to various reasons such as, economies of scale, patents and
trademarks, control over the sources of raw materials, government’s sanction,
need of a large capital, and so on. The chief characteristic of oligopoly is the
interdependence among the rival sellers.
Definition
• “Oligopoly is that situation in which a firm bases its markets policy in part on the expected behaviour of a few close rivals.” – J. Stigier
• “An oligopoly is a market of only a few sellers, offering either homogeneous or differentiated products. There are so few sellers that
they recognize their mutual dependence.” – PC. Dooley
• “Oligopoly is a market structure characterized by a small number of firms and a great deal of interdependence.” –Mansfield
Forms of Oligopoly
• Pure Oligopoly: Here, the oligopolists sell practically homogeneous
products. This type is found in steel, copper, cement petrol and a few
other industries.
• Differential Oligopoly: In such a case a few firms sell similar but not
identical products under the same conditions. It is found in automobiles,
tyre, electrical appliances, cigarettes, baby food and a few other
industries.
Characteristics of Oligopoly
• Interdependence: If a small number of sizeable firms constitute an industry
and one of these firms starts advertising campaign on a big scale or designs a
new model of the product which immediately captures the market, it will
surely provoke countermoves on the part of rival firms in the industry.
• Advertising: Advertising is a powerful instrument in the hands of an
oligopolist. A firm under oligopoly can start an aggressive advertising
campaign with the intention of capturing a large part of the market.
• Group Behaviour: There can be two firms in the group, or three or five or even
fifteen, but not a few hundred. Whatever the number, it is quite small so that
each firm knows that its actions will have some effect on other firms in the
group.
• Competition: Since under oligopoly, there are a few sellers, a move by one
seller immediately affects the rivals. So each seller is always on the alert and
keeps a close watch over the moves of its rivals in order to have a counter-
move.
Characteristics of Oligopoly
• Barriers to Entry of Firms: As there is keen competition in an oligopolistic industry,
there are no barriers to entry into or exit from it. However, in the long-run, there are
some types of barriers to entry which tend to restrain new firms from entering the
industry.
• Lack of Uniformity: Firms differ considerably in size. Some may be small, others very
large.
• Existence of Price Rigidity: In oligopoly situation, each firm has to stick to its price. If
any firm tries to reduce its price, the rival firms will retaliate by a higher reduction in
their prices. This will lead to a situation of price war which benefits none.
• No Unique Pattern of Pricing Behaviour: Each firm wants to remain independent and
to get the maximum possible profit. Towards this end, they act and react on the price-
output movements of one another which are a continuous element of uncertainty.
• Indeterminate Demand Curve: The interdependence of the oligopolists, however,
makes it impossible to draw a demand curve for such sellers except for the situations
where the form of interdependence is well defined. In real business operations, the
demand curve remains indeterminate.
Price Determination under oligopoly
• ‘Tight’ oligopoly situation in which two or three firms dominate the
entire market and the ‘loose’ oligopoly situation where six or seven firms
occupy the maximum share of the market. Other firms share the
balance. It includes both differentiation and standardization. It
encompasses the cases in which firms are acting in collusion and in
which they are acting independently. Therefore, the existence of various
forms of oligopoly prevents the development of a general theory of price
and output. The element of mutual interdependence in oligopolistic
market further complicates the determination of price and output.
Price Determination under oligopoly
1. Price Determination in Non-Collusive Oligopoly: In this case, each firm
follows an independent price and output policy on the basis of its judgment
about the reactions of his rivals. If the firms are producing homogeneous
products, price war may occur. Each firm has to fix the price at the
competitive level. On the contrary, in case of differentiated oligopoly, due to
product differentiation, each firm has some monopoly control over the
market and therefore charge near monopoly price.
2. Equilibrium under Collusion: The modern economists are of the view that
independent price determination cannot exist for long in oligopoly. It leads
to uncertainty and insecurity and to overcome them there is a tendency
among oligopolists to act collectively by tacit collusion. In addition, the
firms can gain the economics of production. All the firms in oligopoly tend
to enlarge their size and lower their costs of production per unit and
capture maximum share of the market.
Collusive oligopoly is a situation in which firms in a particular industry
decide to join together as a single unit for the purpose of maximising their
joint profits and to negotiate among themselves so as to share the market.
Business Economics
Unit 5
Theories of Distribution
Rent
• Concept: the term, rent is applied to the periodic payments
made regularly for the hire of a particular asset. For example,
the payments made by a tenant to the owner of a house, or
factory or land on weekly, monthly, or yearly basis is a rent in
the popular sense.
• Modern Concept of Rent: "Economic rent may be defined an
any payment to a unit of production which Is in excess of the
minimum amount necessary to keep that factor In its present
occupation".
Rent
• Definitions
Prof. Marshal defined rent as, “The income derived from the
ownership of land and other free gifts of nature.”
Prof. Ricardo defined rent as, “the payment by a tenant
farmer to the landlord for the use of the land.”
Modern View: Rent is a payment to any factor of production,
over and above its transfer earning.”
Recardian Theory of Rent
The theory of economic rent was first propounded by the
English Classical Economist David Ricardo (1773 -1823). David Ricardo in his book. "Principles of Political Economy and
Taxation", defined rent as, “that portion of the produce of the earth which is paid to the landlord for the use of the original
and indestructible power of the soil.”
Ricardo in his theory of rent has emphasized that rent is a
reward for the services of land which is fixed in supply.
Secondly, it arises due to original qualities of land which are indestructible". (The original indestructible powers of the soil
include natural soil, fertility, mineral deposits, climatic conditions etc.
Recardian Theory of Rent
Assumptions:
1) Land has no alternative use
2) Transfer price of land is zero
3) Rent depends on fertility and location of the land
4) No landlord is a farmer and no farmer is a landlord
5) Land differs in fertility
6) Law of diminishing returns works here
7) Land possesses certain original and indestructible power
8) Assumption of perfect competition
9) Theory assumes order of cultivation
10) Rent does not enter into the price of the product
11) Existence of marginal or no rent land
12) Tendencies of diminishing returns and increasing population
Recardian Theory of Rent
Rent Under Extensive Cultivation
According to Ricardo, all the units of land are not of the same grade.
They differ in fertility and location. The application of the same amount of
labor, capital and other cooperating resources give rise to difference in
productivity. This difference in productivity or the surplus which arises on the
superior units of land over the inferior units is an economic rent".
Grades of
Land
Cost of
Cultivation
Production of
Wheat (in Qntls)
Value of output (Rs.
1000 per Qntl)
Rent
‘A’ (2 Acres) Rs. 20000 30 Rs. 30000 Rs.
10000
‘B’ (2 Acres) Rs. 20000 25 Rs. 25000 Rs. 5000
‘C’ (2 Acres) Rs. 20000 20 Rs. 20000 Rs. 000
Recardian Theory of Rent
Rent Under Extensive Cultivation
Graphical Illustration
Re
nt &
Co
st
Plots of Land
30000
20000
10000
A C B
Differential Surplus
No Rent Land
Cost
Recardian Theory of Rent
Rent Under Intensive Cultivation
Unit of Labour
and Capital
Cost of
Cultivation
Production of
Wheat (in Qntls)
Value of output (Rs.
1000 per Qntl)
Rent
‘I’ (2 Acres) Rs. 20000 30 Rs. 30000 Rs.
10000
‘II’ (2 Acres) Rs. 20000 25 Rs. 25000 Rs. 5000
‘III’ (2 Acres) Rs. 20000 20 Rs. 20000 Rs. 000
Recardian Theory of Rent
Rent Under Intensive Cultivation
Graphical Illustration
Re
nt &
Co
st
No of Attempts
30000
20000
10000
I III II
Super Marginal Doses
Marginal Dose
Cost
Criticism on Ricardian Theory of Rent
i) No Original and Indestructible Power: Ricardo is of the opinion that rent is paid due to the original and indestructible powers of the soil. It is pointed out that there are no powers of the soil which are indestructible. As we go on cultivating a piece of land time and again, its fertility gradually diminishes. To this criticism, it is replied that there are properties of the soil, such as climate situation, sunshine, humidity, soil composition, etc., which are infect original and indestructible.
ii) Wrong Assumption of 'No Rent Land': Ricardo assumes the existence of no-rent land. A land which just meets the cost of cultivation. The modern economists are of the opinion that if a plot of land can be put to several uses, then it does yield rent.
iii) Rent Enters Into Price: According to Ricardo, rent does not enter into price. The modern economists are of the opinion that it does eater into price.
iv) Wrong Assumption of Perfect Competition: Ricardo is of the opinion that perfect competition prevails between the landlord and the tenant, but in the actual world, it is imperfect competition which is the order of the day.
Criticism on Ricardian Theory of Rent
v) All Lands are Equally Fertile: Ricardo assumes that rent arises due to difference in the fertility of the soil. But the modern economists assert that if all lands are equally fertile, even then the rent will arise. The rent can arise: (a) if the produce is not sufficient to meet the requirements of the people, and (b) due the operation of the law of diminishing returns.
vi) Historically Wrong: Carey and Roscher have criticized the orders of cultivation assumed by Ricardo. They are of the opinion that it is not necessary that A grade land will be cultivated first, even if it lies far away from the city. To this it is replied by Walker that when Ricardo uses the words 'best land' he means by it the land which is superior both in fertility and in situation.
vii) Neglect of Scarcity Principle: It is pointed out by the modem economists that the concept of rent can be easily explained with the help of the scarcity principle and so there is no need to have a separate theory of rent.
viii) The order of cultivation is wrong
ix) Law of diminishing returns can be postponed
x) Applicable in the long run only
Wage
Meaning & Definition
• In economics, the price paid to labour for its contribution to the process of production
is called wages.
• Labour is an important factor of production. If there is no labour to work, all other factors, be it land or capital, will remain idle.
• Thus, Karl Marx termed labour as the “creator of all value”.
“A wage may be defined as the sum of money paid under contract by an employer to worker for services rendered.” -Benham.
“Wages is the payment to labour for its assistance to production.” -A.H. Hansen.
'Wage rate is the price paid for the use of labour.” -Mc Connell.
“Wage is a price paid by the employer to the worker on account of labour performed.” T. R. Turner
Concepts of Wages
A. Money Wages or Nominal Wages: The total amount of money received
by the labourer in the process of production is called the money wages or nominal wages.
B. Real Wages: Real wages mean translation of money wages into real terms or in terms of commodities and services that money can buy. They refer to the advantages of worker’s occupation, i.e. the amount of the necessaries, comforts and luxuries of life which the worker can command in return for his services.
An example will make the things clear. Suppose ‘A’ receives Rs. 500 p.m. as money wages during the year. Suppose also that midway through the year the prices of commodities and services, that the worker buys, go up, on the average, by 50%.
It means that though the money wages remain the same, the real wages (consumption basket in terms of commodities and services) are reduced by 50%. Real wages also include extra supplementary benefits along with the money wages.
Types of Wages
1. Piece Wages: Piece wages are the wages paid according to the work done by
the worker. To calculate the piece wages, the number of units produced by the worker are taken into consideration.
2. Time Wages: If the labourer is paid for his services according to time, it is called as time wages. For example, if the labour is paid Rs. 35 per day, it will be termed as time wage.
3. Cash Wages: Cash wages refer to the wages paid to the labour in terms of money. The salary paid to a worker is an instance of cash wages.
4. Wages in Kind: When the labourer is paid in terms of goods rather than cash, is called the wage in kind. These types of wages are popular in rural areas.
5. Contract Wages: Under this type, the wages are fixed in the beginning for complete work. For instance, if a contractor is told that he will be paid Rs. 25,000 for the construction of building, it will be termed as contract wages.
Marginal Productivity Theory of wages
• The marginal productivity theory of wage states that the price
of labour, i.e., wage rate, is determined according to the marginal product of labour. This was stated by the neoclassical
economists, especially J. B. Clark, in the late 1890s.
• The term marginal product of labour is interpreted here in
three ways: marginal physical product of labour, value of the marginal product of labour and marginal revenue product of
labour.
• According to this theory, “the wages of a labour should be
equal to his marginal productivity.”
Marginal Productivity Theory of wages
• In the short run wages may be more or less than marginal
productivity, but in the long run the wages must be equal to
the value of the marginal productivity.
• As consumer demands commodity on account of its utility, in
the same way labour is demanded on account of his
productivity.
• And as consumer will not pay more than products utility, in
the same way wages will not be paid more than labour’s
productivity.
Marginal Productivity Theory of wages
Marginal Productivity Theory of wages
Assumptions
i. Perfect competition prevails in products and labour market.
ii. Law of variable proportions operates.
iii. The firm aims at profit-maximization.
iv. All labourers are homogeneous and are divisible.
v. Labour is mobile and is substitutable to capital and other
inputs.
vi. Resources are fully employed.
Marginal Productivity Theory of wages
Limitations of Marginal Productivity Theory of Wage
i. In the real world, perfect competition does not exist.
ii. Perfect mobility of labour is another unrealistic assumption. Mobility of labour may be restricted due to socio-political reasons.
iii. The marginal productivity theory of wage ignores the supply side of labour and concentrates only on the demand for labour.
iv. Full employment of resources is another unrealistic assumption.
v. Finally, this theory ignores the usefulness of trade union in wage determination.
vi. This Theory, in fact, is not a wage theory but a theory of employment. Wage rate is predetermined.
vii. Labour can never be homogeneous, some may be skilled and some may be unskilled.
viii. The demand for labour does not depend on marginal productivity but it depends upon savings of the capitalists.
Interest
Meaning & Definitions
• Interest is a premium which is paid on capital that is borrowed.
• In simple words, interest means the reward for the use of capital. It
is also called the income of the owner of capital for lending it.
• In other words, it is the price paid by the borrower of money to its lender.
“Interest is the price paid for the use of capital in any market.”
–Marshall
“Interest is a reward for parting with liquidity for a specified period.”
-J.M. Keynes
“Interest is a payment made by the borrower of capital, by virtue of its productivity, a reward for the abstinence.”
– Knut Wicksell
Concept of Interest
Gross Interest: Gross interest refers to the entire payments made by the borrower to the lender on a certain amount of loan received for a period of time. It includes not only the payment for the use of money capital but also for risks, inconvenience and management.
Net Interest: Net interest is the payment purely made for the use of money. Net interest rate is determined by the forces of demand and supply of funds or money. It generally relates to public and is comparatively low to gross interest.
Gross Interest includes
1) Net Interest
2) Insurance against risk
3) Wages for management
4) Reward for inconvenience
Loanable funds theory of interest
• The neo-classical theory of interest or loanable funds theory of
interest owes its origin to the Swedish economist Knut Wicksell.
• According to this theory, rate of interest is determined by the
demand for and supply of loanable funds. In this regard this theory is more realistic and broader than the classical theory of interest.
• Classical economists says that money is merely a medium of
exchange, that is why does not have any effect on the real economic variables which determine the rate of interest.
• But neo-classical economists argue that interest is the price for the use of money which affects the economic variables and the factors
responsible for demand & supply of loanable funds.
Loanable funds theory of interest
Demand for Loanable Funds
• The demand for the loanable funds is inversely related to the rate of interest, so the demand slopes downward from left to right.
• According to this theory demand for loanable funds arises for the following three purposes;
1. Investment (I): Investment refers to the expenditure for the purchase of making of new capital goods including inventories. The price of obtaining such funds for the purpose of these investments depends on the rate of interest.
2. Hoarding (H): The demand for loanable funds is also made up by those people who want to hoard it as idle cash balances to satisfy their desire for liquidity.
3. Consumption Demand (CD): This demand comes from the people at that time when they want to spend beyond their current income.
Loanable funds theory of interest
Supply for Loanable Funds
• The supply of loanable funds is derived from the basic four sources as savings, dishoarding, disinvestment and bank credit.
1. Savings (S): Savings constitute the most important source of the supply of loanable funds.
2. Dishoarding (DH): Dishoarding is another important source of the supply of loanable funds. Generally, individuals may dishoard money from the past hoardings at a higher rate of interest.
3. Disinvestment (DI): Disinvestment will be high when the present interest rate provides better returns in comparison to present earnings.
4. Bank Money (BM): The banks advance loans to the businessmen through the process of credit creation.
Loanable funds theory of interest
Determination of Rate of Interest
According to loanable funds
theory, equilibrium rate of interest is that
which brings equality between the
demand for and supply of loanable funds.
In other words, equilibrium interest rate is
determined at a point where the demand
for loanable funds curve intersects the
supply curve of loanable funds
The daigram shows that the
equilibrium rate of interest is EM; at this
rate, the demand for loanable funds is
equal to the supply of loanable funds i.e.
OM.
Loanable funds theory of interest
Criticism
1. Full Employment: Keynes opined that loanable funds theory is based on the unrealistic assumption of full employment
2. Indeterminate: This theory assumes that savings and income both are independent. But savings depend on income.
3. Impracticable: This theory assumes savings, hoarding, investment etc. to be related to interest rate. But in actual practice investment is not only affected by interest rate but also by the marginal efficiency of capital whose affect has been ignored.
4. Unsatisfactory Integration of Real and Monetary Factors:
5. Constancy of National Income: Loanable funds theory rests on the assumption that the level of national income remains unchanged. In reality, due to the change in investment, income level also changes accordingly.
6. In modern times the rate of interest is mainly an administered price which is determined by the monetary authority of the country.
7. This theory is indeterminate unless the income level is already known.
Profit
Meaning
The term profit has distinct meaning for different people, such as businessmen,
accountants, policymakers, workers and economists.
Profit simply means a positive gain generated from business operations or investment
after subtracting all expenses or costs.
In economic terms profit is defined as a reward received by an entrepreneur by
combining all the factors of production to serve the need of individuals in the
economy faced with uncertainties.
Entrepreneur performs important functions in production and he is rewarded for his
services in the form of profit.
Profit
Definitions
“For bearing the risks or uncertainties associated with production, an entrepreneur gets profit as reward.” – Hawley
“Profit is earned by the entrepreneur for bearing uncertainties related with the production and sales.” – Prof. Knight
“Profit is a dynamic surplus.” – Clerk
“Profit is reward to entrepreneur for his role as a innovator.” – Joseph
Schumpeter
Gross Profit: wages, rent & other manufacturing expenses.
Net Profit: Salary, interest A& office expenses.
Uncertainty bearing theory of profit
• This theory was propounded by an American economist Prof. Frank H. Knight. This theory, starts on the foundation of Hawley’s risk bearing theory. Knight agrees with Hawley that profit is a reward for risk-taking. There are two types
of risks viz. foreseeable risk and unforeseeable risk. According to Knight unforeseeable risk is called uncertainty bearing.
• Knight, regards profit as the reward for bearing non-insurable risks and uncertainties. He distinguishes between insurable and non-insurable risks.
• Non-insurable risk is called uncertainty bearing and he regards profit as the
reward of bearing non-insurable risks and uncertainties. So there is direct relationship between profit and uncertainty bearing. The greater the uncertainty, the higher the level of profit.
• Insurable risks: Fire, Theft, Flood, Death by accident etc.
• Non-Insurable Risks: Competition, Technology, Risk of govt. intervention, Cyclical risk, Risk of demand etc.
Uncertainty bearing theory of profit
Criticism 1. According to this theory, profit is the reward for uncertainty bearing. But critics point
out that sometimes an entrepreneur earns no profit in spite of uncertainty bearing.
2. Uncertainty bearing is one of the determinants of profit and it is not the only
determinant. Profit is also a reward for many other activities performed by
entrepreneur like initiating, coordinating and bargaining, etc.
3. It is not possible to measure uncertainty in quantitative terms as depicted in this
theory.
4. In modern business corporations ownership is separate from control. Decision-making
is done by the salaried managers who control and organise the corporation.
Ownership rests with the shareholders who ultimately bear uncertainties of business.
Knight does not separate ownership and control and this theory becomes unrealistic.
5. Uncertainty bearing cannot be looked upon as a separate factor of production like
land, labour or capital. It is a psychological concept which forms part of the real cost of
production.
6. Monopoly firms earn much larger profits than competitive firms and they are not due
to the presence of uncertainty. This theory throws no light on monopoly profit.