business weekly newsletter, august 13, 2010 - parshah shoftim 5770

Upload: danielalevine

Post on 29-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Business Weekly Newsletter, August 13, 2010 - Parshah Shoftim 5770

    1/2

    TORYLINE

    continued on revers

    continued on reverse

    rained out By Rabbi Meir OrlianHalacha Writer for the Business Halacha Institute

    Springville Yeshiva Elementary (S.Y.E.) wasnishing the school year. Their principal,

    Rabbi Rubin, had rented the premises ofnearby Sunshine Day Camp for a day of

    sports activities. There would be a basket-ball tournament, volleyball matches andhe annual softball game. To secure the

    grounds, S.Y.E. arranged with the camp amonth ahead, and paid an advance pay-ment of $500.The morning before the event, Rabbi Rubinstened to the weather report: Showers ex-

    pected tomorrow afternoon... He consult-ed with the schools activities coordinator.I hate to cancel the event, she said. The

    kids look forward to it for weeks! Anyway,ts not supposed to rain until the afternoon.

    suggest we leave it meanwhile, but pleasemake arrangements with the JCC to useheir indoor facilities if needed.

    By late afternoon, however, the weathermanreported: Rain expected throughout theday tomorrow...Rabbi Rubin sighed, Another rained-out

    event. He confirmed with the JCC, andcalled Sunshine to cancel. He then sentthem an official letter requesting a refund ofthe advance payment, since the event hadbeen cancelled for reasons beyond theircontrol.A week later, though, S.Y.E. received a billfrom Sunshine for the remaining $1,000.Rabbi Rubin immediately called Mr. Mey-ers, Sunshines director, to verify that the billwas issued by mistake. Mr. Meyers, howev-er, insisted that there was no mistake. Theyhad signed a rental contract of $1,500 for

    the grounds, and the rain was not his faulteither. Furthermore, after renting to S.Y.E.,the camp had to turn away several requests

    for the grounds by other parties.Rabbi Rubin had expected the advpayment to be returned, but insteawas being asked to pay the remainde

    called Rabbi Dayan.Rabbi Dayan heard the story and said,Gemara in Bava Metzia (76b-77a) discutwo cases that can serve as paradigmone, someone hired workers to dig ditin his field the next day, but it rained hily overnight, making the field too muddig. In the other, someone hired workedivert water from the river to his field rained overnight, rendering the job supous. When the workers arrived in the ming, they claimed their wages anyway, it was now too late to employ thems

    elsewhere.What is the halacha in these two casRabbi Rubin asked.

    OM OUR HOTLINEspare change

    gave a $10 bill to someone collecting

    tzedaka during shacharis. I expected to

    receive $9 in change. After davening, I real-

    zed that he had given me eight singles and

    a $5 bill totaling $13. I have no idea who

    the collector was have no way to track him

    down.

    Q: What should I do with the extra $4?

    A:Shulchan Aruch (Choshen Mishpat 232:2)

    says that if one receives excess change, he

    is obligated to return it if the extra money

    was seemingly given in error and not if it

    was intentional. If money was grouped in

    tens and one received $50 rather than $40,

    we assume that the extra ten was given in

    error. However, if the extra was not consis-

    tent with the denomination that was being

    exchanged, i.e. if tens were being cou

    and the recipient ends up with a num

    that is not a multiple of ten, e.g. $47 ra

    than $40, we assume that $7 was give

    a gift. Sema (232:7) says that the reci

    may assume the extra was given as a

    even if he never met the person before

    cordingly, since the collector was coun

    out $1 bills, it would seem that you ma

    Submitted by

    B. Berkowitz

    w e e k l y

    Businessa project of the Business Halacha Instit

    PARSHAS SHOFTIM

    FRIDAY, AUGUST 13 2010

    VOLUME 1 ISSUE 21

    under the auspices of

    Harav Chaim Kohn , sh l i ta

    B U S I N E S S

    H A L A C H A

    I N S T I T U T E

    y p a n i a u j k i u f n

    To place your logo here, email

    [email protected]

    Business Insurance (845) 426-5400Personal Insurance (845) 369-9000

    by his son, R Shlomo Werdiger

    Business Weekly has

    been dedicated

  • 8/9/2019 Business Weekly Newsletter, August 13, 2010 - Parshah Shoftim 5770

    2/2

    MONEY MATTERS

    defective merchandise week #2

    STORYLINE CONTINUED FROM OUR HOTLINE CONTINUED

    Business Halacha Inst itute 718.846.2501 www.BusinessHalacha . com

    TO RECEIVE THIS NEWSLETTER FREE OF CHARGE, EMAIL [email protected]

    All new subscribers will receive a free copy of our popular publication, Money - The Bottom Line, in pdf form

    sume that he gave you the

    $5 bill intentionally. Rema,

    however, adds that the cus-

    tom today is to count each

    bill separately, so we assume

    that the $4 was given in error

    and you must return it.

    Since the collector is likely

    unaware that he gave you ex-

    tra change, this is a case of

    yeiush shelo mdaas aban-

    donment without awareness.

    Shulchan Aruch (CM 262:3)

    rules if one finds a lost object

    before the owner realizes its

    lost, he must hold the object

    until the owner is located.

    This applies even if, as in

    your case, the owner would

    abandon hope of recovering

    the money when he realizes

    its missing (Sema 262:9).

    You must hold onto the mon-

    ey until you return it to its

    owner, or until the arrival of

    Eliyahu HaNavi who will id

    tify the rightful owner (

    262:4, 267:15). Poskim w

    that when the owner can

    be identified, one may m

    down a description of the

    object. Once that informat

    is safely stored, the fin

    is permitted to use, sell

    discard the object. He

    reimburse the owner wh

    Eliyahu HaNavi arrives (

    267:21, Igros Moshe Cho

    en Mishpat vol. 2 siman 4

    Shulchan Aruch (CM 276:

    writes that when money

    found, the finder may not u

    the funds for himself. Curr

    Poskim, however, write tha

    the amount of lost money

    readily available, the fin

    may record the amount a

    meanwhile use the mo

    himself (Hashavas Aveid

    KHalacha ch.6 par. 3).

    Q: I purchased a dining table for $2,500

    and it had a large, noticeable dent on one

    of the legs. What recourse do I have?

    What is the sellers responsibility?

    A: If you purchase merchandise and find it

    defective, the sale is in error and void. You

    are entitled to return it for a full refund. This

    s true even if the seller was also unaware of

    the defect (C.M. 232:3).

    If the seller wants to refund $1,000 and up-

    hold the sale, you can insist that you prefer

    an intact item to a defective item at reduced

    cost. Similarly, if you want to uphold the sale

    and demand a discount, the seller can re-

    fuse and insist on cancelling the deal and

    returning the monies (232:4).

    If the table can be completely repaired as

    good as new, such as if the leg is s

    screwed in and an identical leg is avai

    the seller can opt to uphold the sale

    pay for the repair.

    However, if the leg is solidly attached t

    table and replacing it would weaken

    table, you can refuse repair and insist

    refund (232:5).

    Rava ruled that the employerdoesnt have to pay them, sincethe job had to be cancelled be-cause of circumstances beyondhis control, and both partieswere equally aware of the possi-bility of rain. The workers shouldhave realized that there was nopoint in coming, If they expect-ed payment even in the case of

    rain, it was their responsibility tostipulate that in advance.Rabbi Dayan concluded: Mostposkim compare renting a prop-erty to hiring workers (C.M.312:17, 334:1). They discussa case in which uncontrollablecircumstances render a rentalmpossible, e.g., the house col-apsed or the renter died. Therenter or his heirs do not haveto pay for the unused part of therental, unless there is a preva-

    ent local practice otherwise.Thus, in the absence of a clearpractice, you do not have to paythe $1,000, since you were un-able to use the camp groundsfor reasons beyond your con-trol. In the future, though, itwould be best to specify this inthe contract.What about refunding the $500

    advance payment? asked Rab-bi Rubin.That is a complicated issue,replied Rabbi Dayan. It involvesan intricate case in the Gemara(79a-b) about a shipping boatthat sank en route. There arealso many specific consider-ations: the amount and natureof the advance payment, the

    prevalent local practice, the like-lihood that other renters wouldhave sufficed with indoor facili-ties, and the degree to which thegrounds became muddy andunusable. The question cannotbe answered properly withouthearing both sides of the storyand investigating the issue thor-oughly.So what should I do now?asked Rabbi Rubin.Try to work things out with

    Mr. Meyers, answered RabbiDayan. I recommend that youforego the advance payment orthat they give you vouchers forit. If you and Mr. Meyers cannotreach a mutually satisfying ar-rangement, you should go to-gether for a professional rabbin-ic consultation or turn to a beisdin to adjudicate the matter.

    MONEY MATTERS

    Bankruptcy:

    How to reconcile halacha and secular law

    Monsey Night Seder Bais Medrash 29 Parker Boulevard Sunday MorningsChavrusos/Prep Shiur: 9:30 - 10:45 am Shiur: 10:45 - 11:15 am

    WEEKLY STUDY GROUP

    For more information, please contact Aron Subar at

    845-558-8734, or [email protected]

    Please contact our confidential hotline with youquestions & comments

    877.845.8455 [email protected]

    This weeks newsletter has

    been sponsored by

    an admirer ofBusiness Weekly

    and the Business Halacha Institut

    To sponsor a newsletter for $180, [email protected]