by: other authors :

30

Upload: lyndon

Post on 08-Feb-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Impact of The Input Energy on The SOA Gain with Non-uniform Biasing. By: Other AuTHORS :. Ahmed Abd El Aziz Shalaby. Dr. Wai Pang Ng Prof. Zabih Ghassemlooy Prof. Moustafa Hussien (Arab Academy for Science and Technology, Egypt) Dr. Razali Ngah - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: By: Other  AuTHORS :
Page 2: By: Other  AuTHORS :

Presentation Outline

Introduction All-optical packet switching All-optical router Mach-Zehnder Interformeter(MZI)

SOA structure ProblemProposedOur proposal

Page 3: By: Other  AuTHORS :

Presentation Outline

Segmentisation modelUniform biasingNon-uniform biasing

Triangular bias current Sawtooth bias current

Comparison between uniform and non-uniform biasing techniques

Conclusions

Page 4: By: Other  AuTHORS :
Page 5: By: Other  AuTHORS :

All-optical packet switching

Edge Router (Ingress/Egress) with 4-bit address XXXX

Core Router

1011

1010 0110

0111

Client Network

Client Network

1001

XXXX

Low-speed packet

Low-speed packet

High-speed packet

Core Network

Page 6: By: Other  AuTHORS :

Buffer

Input

Output

Main modules Optional modules

Packet

Delay unit

Clock Extraction

Header Extraction

Header Recognition

Look-up Routing Table

Reconfiguration

Optical Switching Unit

Controlling Contention

Signal Processing (2R, 3R, equalization)

Splitter

All-optical router

Page 7: By: Other  AuTHORS :

Mach-Zehnder Interformeter (MZI)

Page 8: By: Other  AuTHORS :

CP1

SOA1

SOA2 CP2

Input Output 1

Output 2

Symmetric Mach-Zehnder (SMZ)

Mach-Zehnder Interformeter (MZI)

Page 9: By: Other  AuTHORS :

Advantages of SMZ Narrow and square switching window Compact size Thermal stability and low power operation High integration potential Strong nonlinearity characteristics

Mach-Zehnder Interformeter (MZI)

Page 10: By: Other  AuTHORS :

Injection current (I)

L

Input facet of active region Input signals

Output signals

Output facet

Hw

SOA structure

Page 11: By: Other  AuTHORS :

Energy gap

E2 (conduction band)

E1 (valence band)

Stimulated absorption

Stimulated emission

Spontaneous emission

Hole Electron (carrier)

Photon Inducing photon

Stimulated photon

Input optical signal (photon)

Output amplified optical signal

SOA structure

Page 12: By: Other  AuTHORS :

Problem

For high-speed applications, the SOA must have a fast gain recovery time to avoid system penalties arising from bit pattern dependencies. The gain recovery of the conventional SOAs is limited by the long carrier-recovery time.

Page 13: By: Other  AuTHORS :

Proposed

The slow gain recovery can be improved by increasing the injected bias current, the device length or by changing the pulse width (input energy) of the input signal [5]. Several research groups have reported theoretical and experimental results on externally injected SOAs (assist light or holding beam ) [6,7].

Page 14: By: Other  AuTHORS :

Our proposal

Novel non-uniform bias current techniques are injected to the SOA in order to achieve a linear output gain compared to the uniform biasing for ultra-high speed routers.

Page 15: By: Other  AuTHORS :
Page 16: By: Other  AuTHORS :

segment1

segment2

………….. …………….

segment5

t=0 t=l/vgg

t=L/vg

input signal

output signal

Ni

N(1)

N(5)

Segmentisation model of the SOA

Page 17: By: Other  AuTHORS :
Page 18: By: Other  AuTHORS :

• Normalized SOA gain response to single (doted) and multiple (solid) input pulses.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

x 10-9

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Time, t (s)

Nor

mal

ized

SO

A g

ain,

G

multiple input pulsessingle input pulse

Uniform Biasing

Page 19: By: Other  AuTHORS :

• Normalized output gain achieved by successive input pulses.

2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2

x 10-9

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

Time, t (s)

Nor

mal

ized

out

put g

ain

Uniform Biasing

Page 20: By: Other  AuTHORS :
Page 21: By: Other  AuTHORS :

• Sawtooth (doted) and triangular (solid) bias currents.

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

x 10-9

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

Time, t (s)

Bia

s cu

rrent

, I (A

)

sawtoothtriangular

Non-uniform Biasing

Page 22: By: Other  AuTHORS :

• Normalized SOA gain response to multiple of input pulses using triangular bias current.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

x 10-9

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

Time, t (s)

Nor

mal

ized

SO

A g

ain,

GTriangular bias current

Page 23: By: Other  AuTHORS :

• Normalized output gain achieved by successive input pulses using triangular bias current as a ratio of uniform bias current.

2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2

x 10-9

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

Time, t (s)

Nor

mal

ized

out

put g

ain

Triangular bias current

Page 24: By: Other  AuTHORS :

• Normalized SOA gain response to multiple of input pulses using sawtooth bias current.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

x 10-9

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Time, t (s)

Nor

mal

ized

SO

A g

ain,

GSawtooth bias current

Page 25: By: Other  AuTHORS :

• Normalized output gain achieved by successive input pulses using sawtooth bias current as a ratio of uniform bias current.

2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2

x 10-9

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

Time, t (s)

Nor

mal

ized

out

put g

ain

Sawtooth bias current

Page 26: By: Other  AuTHORS :

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

x 10-15

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

Energy, E (J)

Gain

stan

dard

dev

iatio

n,

(d

B)

uniform (40Gbps)sawtooth (40Gbps)triangular (40Gbps)uniform (20Gbps)sawtooth (20Gbps)triangular (20Gbps)uniform (10Gbps)sawtooth (10Gbps)triangular (10Gbps)

40 Gbps 20 Gbps

10 Gbps

Comparing uniform and non-uniform biasing

• Gain standard deviation against the input signal energy for uniform (dot-dashed), sawtooth (doted) and triangular (solid) biasing for a range of data rates.

Page 27: By: Other  AuTHORS :

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

x 10-15

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Energy, E (J)

Gain

stan

dard

dev

iatin

diff

eren

ce (d

B)

sawtooth (40Gbps)sawtooth (20Gbps)sawtooth (10Gbps)triangular (40Gbps)triangular (20Gbps)triangular (10Gbps)

10 Gbps

40 Gbps

20 Gbps

Comparing uniform and non-uniform biasing

Improvement of the gain standard deviation upon uniform biasing

•For sawtooth bias current:• at 10 Gbps 3.25 dB• at 20 Gbps 0.51 dB• at 40 Gbps min improvement

•For triangular bias current:• at 10 Gbps 2.4 dB• at 20 Gbps 0.4 dB• at 40 Gbps min improvement

Page 28: By: Other  AuTHORS :

• Gain standard deviation against the average sawtooth bias current for 1 fJ input signal energy.

0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20

5

10

15

20

25

30

Average bias current, I (A)

Gain

stan

dard

dev

iatio

n,

(d

B)

Page 29: By: Other  AuTHORS :

We have proposed novel techniques to bias the SOA.The total gain response of a segmentized SOA model is simulated.We have investigated applying triangular and sawtooth biasing shapes in order to optimize the gain standard deviation for data rates of 10, 20 and 40 Gbps. Results showed an enhancement to the gain uniformity achieved using non-uniform biasing, especially sawtooth biasing.The impact of the input pulse energy on the gain standard deviation and the output gain for all biasing techniques are investigated. The impact of the average bias current used on the gain uniformity is presented.

Page 30: By: Other  AuTHORS :