c ity of lafayette staff report design review commission

54
Page 1 of 4 City of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 Staff: Jonathan Fox, Assistant Planner Subject: DR12-18CC Alan Guy (Owner/Applicant), R-40 Zoning: Request for a Change of Conditions to the approved application: DR12-18 for the construction of a new 5,083 sq. ft. one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24'-10" on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road, APN: 244-180-056. Change of Conditions is for increases in floor area, architectural modifications, color/material selection, and rear yard improvements. SUMMARY On September 21, 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 2.4-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40,000 sq. ft. lot to 35,560 sq. ft., located at 3654 Happy Valley Road. The subject property is designated as Parcel A o the 2 reconfigured lots. On November 26, 2018 after two public hearings the Design Review Commission approved DR12-18 for the construction of a single-story single-family residence at the subject property. The minutes and staff reports from the October 9, 2018 and November 26, 2018 meetings are attached. The new property owner is returning to the Design Review Commission with a Change of Conditions application for revisions to the previously approved application. Staff finds the revisions are consistent with the Commission’s 2018 approval and that the same findings can be made. Staff recommends the Commission review the project, conduct a public hearing, and adopt Resolution 2020-12 approving the Change of Conditions. LOCATION AND SITE CONDITIONS Location: 3654 Happy Valley Road (APN 244-180-056) General Plan: Low Density Single-Family Residential (up to two dwelling units/acre) Zoning: Single-Family Residential District-40 (R-40) Existing Use: Vacant – Approved Single-Family Residence Lot Size: 1.01-acres (43,996 sq. ft.)

Upload: others

Post on 08-Jun-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Page 1 of 4

City of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Meeting Date Wednesday October 28 2020

Staff Jonathan Fox Assistant Planner

Subject DR12-18CC Alan Guy (OwnerApplicant) R-40 Zoning Request for a Change of Conditions to the approved application DR12-18 for the construction of a new 5083 sq ft one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24-10 on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 Change of Conditions is for increases in floor area architectural modifications colormaterial selection and rear yard improvements

SUMMARY

On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000 sq ft lot to 35560 sq ft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subject property is designated as Parcel A o the 2 reconfigured lots On November 26 2018 after two public hearings the Design Review Commission approved DR12-18 for the construction of a single-story single-family residence at the subject property The minutes and staff reports from the October 9 2018 and November 26 2018 meetings are attached The new property owner is returning to the Design Review Commission with a Change of Conditions application for revisions to the previously approved application Staff finds the revisions are consistent with the Commissionrsquos 2018 approval and that the same findings can be made Staff recommends the Commission review the project conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2020-12 approving the Change of Conditions LOCATION AND SITE CONDITIONS

Location 3654 Happy Valley Road (APN 244-180-056)

General Plan Low Density Single-Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Zoning Single-Family Residential District-40 (R-40)

Existing Use Vacant ndash Approved Single-Family Residence

Lot Size 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Page 2 of 4

TRIGGERS FOR REVIEW

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sqft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Land Use Permit required STAFF ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS General Plan and Zoning Code Consistency The General Plan land use designation for the property is Low Density Single Family Residential which allows up to two dwelling units per acre The proposed single-family dwelling on this 101 acre lot is consistent with this designation The project continues to comply with the development standards of the Single-Family Residential District-40 (R-40) The projectrsquos consistency with these standards is outlined in the following table R-40 Development Standards 2018 Approval Current Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo 24rsquo-10rdquo Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo

53rsquo aggregate 21rsquo-55rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo 54rsquo-25rdquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo 70rsquo-25rdquo Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo 57rsquo-35rdquo Parking min two spaces two spaces Two spaces Design Changes DR12-18 Approved Color and Materials DR12-18CC Proposed Color and Materials Horizontal Wood Siding ndash Benjamin Moore ldquoGrenadier Pondrdquo

Vertical Wood Siding ndash Benjamin Moore ldquoWhite Doverdquo

Trim - Benjamin Moore ldquoWhite Heronrdquo No Trim Composite Roof Shingles - Charcoal Composite Roof Shingles ndash Charcoal amp Black Standing Seam

Metal Roof

Page 3 of 4

Figure 1 DR12-18 Approved Color and Materials

Figure 2 DR12-18CC Proposed Color and Materials

Architectural Modifications

bull Removal of white railings at front porch bull Removal of bay windows at front (west) and rear elevations bull Conversion of sliding door at right (south) elevation to single door bull Removal of window shutters at front (west) and right (south) elevations bull Addition of approximately 400 sq ft in floor area to accommodate additional bedroom and

expansion to master bedroom Landscaping and Rear Yard Improvements

bull Retention of Tree 488 Black Walnut (Approved for Removal under DR12-18) bull Addition of four Arbutus Marina eight Western Redbud and three Toyon bull Expansion of gravel walkway at northern property line to connect to pervious driveway bull Removal of solid 6-foot fence at western (rear) property line

Vehicular Circulation ndash No Change Grading and Drainage ndash No Change View and Privacy Preservation - No Change

Page 4 of 4

PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT All property owners within 300 feet of the subject property (26 in total) were mailed a notice of public hearing No comments have been received for inclusion in this report All comments received by noon on Wednesday October 28th will be emailed to the Commission for review ahead of the public hearing and posted to the Cityrsquos website ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) The project is categorically exempt under Section 15303 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal is to construct a new single-family residence in an area that is currently zoned for residential use and is adequately served by public services STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Design Review Commission review the proposed project conduct a public hearing and adopt DRC Resolution 2020-12 finding the project exempt from CEQA and approving the project subject to conditions ATTACHMENTS 1 DRC Resolution 2020-12 approving DR12-18CC [DRAFT]

a Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval [DRAFT] 2 Maps amp Aerial Photos 3 DRC Resolution 2018-22 approving DR12-18

a Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval 4 Excerpt Minutes of DRC meeting October 9 2020 5 Staff Report of DRC meeting October 9 2020 6 Excerpt Minutes of DRC meeting November 26 2020 7 Staff Report of DRC meeting November 26 2020 8 Referral Agency Comments 9 DR12-18 Public Comment (2018) 10 DR12-18 Approved Plans 11 DR12-18CC Project Plans dated October 14 2020 12 Color and Material Board received October 21 2020

RESOLUTION 2020-12

BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18CC Alan Guy (OwnerApplicant) R-40 Zoning Request for a Change of Conditions to the approved application DR12-18 for the construction of a new 5083 sq ft one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24-10 on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 Change of Conditions is for increases in floor area architectural modifications colormaterial selection and rear yard improvements

WHEREAS on October 14 2020 Alan Guy filed an application requesting a Change of Conditions to the previous application DR12-18 for the construction of a single-family residence on an undeveloped parcel at APN 244-180-056 WHEREAS on October 16 2020 the application was deemed complete WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 New Construction or Conversion of small Structures

WHEREAS on October 16 2020 a notice for the October 28 2020 meeting date for this item was posted within 300 feet of the Project Site and mailed to property owners within a 300 foot radius of the Project Site

WHEREAS on October 28 2020 the Design Review Commission conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a written staff report and approved the revised project subject to conditions NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT

1 The Design Review Commission hereby finds that the recitals set forth above are true and corrected and are incorporated herein

2 All the facts contained in the staff report of October 28 2020 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by reference

3 The required findings to grant a Design Review Permit have been evaluated by the Design Review Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings In granting approval for projects which occur in single-family and multiple-family residential zoning districts as outlined in Section 6-271(A)(1 and 3-6) the hearing authority shall make all the following findings

a) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 2 of 4

anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

b) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography

orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

c) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the

design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be appropriate within this non-hillside property located in a valley of Lafayette

d) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and

coverage of plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height In addition to the findings required in Section 6-275(A) the hearing authority shall make the following findings for projects which occur in single-family residential zoning districts and exceeds 17 feet in height as outlined in Section 6-272(A)(4)

a) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

b) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 3 of 4

deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

c) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

d) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal

bull Involves the development of one single-family residence on a vacant lot in a residential zone

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves DR12-

18CC for a Design Review Permit 6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of October 2020 by the following vote to wit AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT APPROVED ________________________ Glenn Cass Vice Chair

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 4 of 4

ATTEST ________________________ Greg Wolff Planning and Building Services Director ATTACHMENT(S) Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2020-12

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18CC Guy

Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

bull Site plans elevations amp details received October 14 2020 bull Colors amp Materials Board received on October 24 2020

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 28 2020 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 28 2021 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 2: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Page 2 of 4

TRIGGERS FOR REVIEW

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sqft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Land Use Permit required STAFF ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS General Plan and Zoning Code Consistency The General Plan land use designation for the property is Low Density Single Family Residential which allows up to two dwelling units per acre The proposed single-family dwelling on this 101 acre lot is consistent with this designation The project continues to comply with the development standards of the Single-Family Residential District-40 (R-40) The projectrsquos consistency with these standards is outlined in the following table R-40 Development Standards 2018 Approval Current Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo 24rsquo-10rdquo Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo

53rsquo aggregate 21rsquo-55rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo 54rsquo-25rdquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo 70rsquo-25rdquo Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo 57rsquo-35rdquo Parking min two spaces two spaces Two spaces Design Changes DR12-18 Approved Color and Materials DR12-18CC Proposed Color and Materials Horizontal Wood Siding ndash Benjamin Moore ldquoGrenadier Pondrdquo

Vertical Wood Siding ndash Benjamin Moore ldquoWhite Doverdquo

Trim - Benjamin Moore ldquoWhite Heronrdquo No Trim Composite Roof Shingles - Charcoal Composite Roof Shingles ndash Charcoal amp Black Standing Seam

Metal Roof

Page 3 of 4

Figure 1 DR12-18 Approved Color and Materials

Figure 2 DR12-18CC Proposed Color and Materials

Architectural Modifications

bull Removal of white railings at front porch bull Removal of bay windows at front (west) and rear elevations bull Conversion of sliding door at right (south) elevation to single door bull Removal of window shutters at front (west) and right (south) elevations bull Addition of approximately 400 sq ft in floor area to accommodate additional bedroom and

expansion to master bedroom Landscaping and Rear Yard Improvements

bull Retention of Tree 488 Black Walnut (Approved for Removal under DR12-18) bull Addition of four Arbutus Marina eight Western Redbud and three Toyon bull Expansion of gravel walkway at northern property line to connect to pervious driveway bull Removal of solid 6-foot fence at western (rear) property line

Vehicular Circulation ndash No Change Grading and Drainage ndash No Change View and Privacy Preservation - No Change

Page 4 of 4

PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT All property owners within 300 feet of the subject property (26 in total) were mailed a notice of public hearing No comments have been received for inclusion in this report All comments received by noon on Wednesday October 28th will be emailed to the Commission for review ahead of the public hearing and posted to the Cityrsquos website ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) The project is categorically exempt under Section 15303 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal is to construct a new single-family residence in an area that is currently zoned for residential use and is adequately served by public services STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Design Review Commission review the proposed project conduct a public hearing and adopt DRC Resolution 2020-12 finding the project exempt from CEQA and approving the project subject to conditions ATTACHMENTS 1 DRC Resolution 2020-12 approving DR12-18CC [DRAFT]

a Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval [DRAFT] 2 Maps amp Aerial Photos 3 DRC Resolution 2018-22 approving DR12-18

a Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval 4 Excerpt Minutes of DRC meeting October 9 2020 5 Staff Report of DRC meeting October 9 2020 6 Excerpt Minutes of DRC meeting November 26 2020 7 Staff Report of DRC meeting November 26 2020 8 Referral Agency Comments 9 DR12-18 Public Comment (2018) 10 DR12-18 Approved Plans 11 DR12-18CC Project Plans dated October 14 2020 12 Color and Material Board received October 21 2020

RESOLUTION 2020-12

BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18CC Alan Guy (OwnerApplicant) R-40 Zoning Request for a Change of Conditions to the approved application DR12-18 for the construction of a new 5083 sq ft one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24-10 on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 Change of Conditions is for increases in floor area architectural modifications colormaterial selection and rear yard improvements

WHEREAS on October 14 2020 Alan Guy filed an application requesting a Change of Conditions to the previous application DR12-18 for the construction of a single-family residence on an undeveloped parcel at APN 244-180-056 WHEREAS on October 16 2020 the application was deemed complete WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 New Construction or Conversion of small Structures

WHEREAS on October 16 2020 a notice for the October 28 2020 meeting date for this item was posted within 300 feet of the Project Site and mailed to property owners within a 300 foot radius of the Project Site

WHEREAS on October 28 2020 the Design Review Commission conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a written staff report and approved the revised project subject to conditions NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT

1 The Design Review Commission hereby finds that the recitals set forth above are true and corrected and are incorporated herein

2 All the facts contained in the staff report of October 28 2020 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by reference

3 The required findings to grant a Design Review Permit have been evaluated by the Design Review Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings In granting approval for projects which occur in single-family and multiple-family residential zoning districts as outlined in Section 6-271(A)(1 and 3-6) the hearing authority shall make all the following findings

a) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 2 of 4

anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

b) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography

orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

c) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the

design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be appropriate within this non-hillside property located in a valley of Lafayette

d) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and

coverage of plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height In addition to the findings required in Section 6-275(A) the hearing authority shall make the following findings for projects which occur in single-family residential zoning districts and exceeds 17 feet in height as outlined in Section 6-272(A)(4)

a) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

b) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 3 of 4

deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

c) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

d) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal

bull Involves the development of one single-family residence on a vacant lot in a residential zone

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves DR12-

18CC for a Design Review Permit 6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of October 2020 by the following vote to wit AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT APPROVED ________________________ Glenn Cass Vice Chair

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 4 of 4

ATTEST ________________________ Greg Wolff Planning and Building Services Director ATTACHMENT(S) Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2020-12

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18CC Guy

Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

bull Site plans elevations amp details received October 14 2020 bull Colors amp Materials Board received on October 24 2020

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 28 2020 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 28 2021 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 3: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Page 3 of 4

Figure 1 DR12-18 Approved Color and Materials

Figure 2 DR12-18CC Proposed Color and Materials

Architectural Modifications

bull Removal of white railings at front porch bull Removal of bay windows at front (west) and rear elevations bull Conversion of sliding door at right (south) elevation to single door bull Removal of window shutters at front (west) and right (south) elevations bull Addition of approximately 400 sq ft in floor area to accommodate additional bedroom and

expansion to master bedroom Landscaping and Rear Yard Improvements

bull Retention of Tree 488 Black Walnut (Approved for Removal under DR12-18) bull Addition of four Arbutus Marina eight Western Redbud and three Toyon bull Expansion of gravel walkway at northern property line to connect to pervious driveway bull Removal of solid 6-foot fence at western (rear) property line

Vehicular Circulation ndash No Change Grading and Drainage ndash No Change View and Privacy Preservation - No Change

Page 4 of 4

PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT All property owners within 300 feet of the subject property (26 in total) were mailed a notice of public hearing No comments have been received for inclusion in this report All comments received by noon on Wednesday October 28th will be emailed to the Commission for review ahead of the public hearing and posted to the Cityrsquos website ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) The project is categorically exempt under Section 15303 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal is to construct a new single-family residence in an area that is currently zoned for residential use and is adequately served by public services STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Design Review Commission review the proposed project conduct a public hearing and adopt DRC Resolution 2020-12 finding the project exempt from CEQA and approving the project subject to conditions ATTACHMENTS 1 DRC Resolution 2020-12 approving DR12-18CC [DRAFT]

a Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval [DRAFT] 2 Maps amp Aerial Photos 3 DRC Resolution 2018-22 approving DR12-18

a Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval 4 Excerpt Minutes of DRC meeting October 9 2020 5 Staff Report of DRC meeting October 9 2020 6 Excerpt Minutes of DRC meeting November 26 2020 7 Staff Report of DRC meeting November 26 2020 8 Referral Agency Comments 9 DR12-18 Public Comment (2018) 10 DR12-18 Approved Plans 11 DR12-18CC Project Plans dated October 14 2020 12 Color and Material Board received October 21 2020

RESOLUTION 2020-12

BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18CC Alan Guy (OwnerApplicant) R-40 Zoning Request for a Change of Conditions to the approved application DR12-18 for the construction of a new 5083 sq ft one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24-10 on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 Change of Conditions is for increases in floor area architectural modifications colormaterial selection and rear yard improvements

WHEREAS on October 14 2020 Alan Guy filed an application requesting a Change of Conditions to the previous application DR12-18 for the construction of a single-family residence on an undeveloped parcel at APN 244-180-056 WHEREAS on October 16 2020 the application was deemed complete WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 New Construction or Conversion of small Structures

WHEREAS on October 16 2020 a notice for the October 28 2020 meeting date for this item was posted within 300 feet of the Project Site and mailed to property owners within a 300 foot radius of the Project Site

WHEREAS on October 28 2020 the Design Review Commission conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a written staff report and approved the revised project subject to conditions NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT

1 The Design Review Commission hereby finds that the recitals set forth above are true and corrected and are incorporated herein

2 All the facts contained in the staff report of October 28 2020 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by reference

3 The required findings to grant a Design Review Permit have been evaluated by the Design Review Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings In granting approval for projects which occur in single-family and multiple-family residential zoning districts as outlined in Section 6-271(A)(1 and 3-6) the hearing authority shall make all the following findings

a) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 2 of 4

anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

b) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography

orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

c) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the

design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be appropriate within this non-hillside property located in a valley of Lafayette

d) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and

coverage of plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height In addition to the findings required in Section 6-275(A) the hearing authority shall make the following findings for projects which occur in single-family residential zoning districts and exceeds 17 feet in height as outlined in Section 6-272(A)(4)

a) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

b) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 3 of 4

deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

c) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

d) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal

bull Involves the development of one single-family residence on a vacant lot in a residential zone

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves DR12-

18CC for a Design Review Permit 6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of October 2020 by the following vote to wit AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT APPROVED ________________________ Glenn Cass Vice Chair

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 4 of 4

ATTEST ________________________ Greg Wolff Planning and Building Services Director ATTACHMENT(S) Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2020-12

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18CC Guy

Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

bull Site plans elevations amp details received October 14 2020 bull Colors amp Materials Board received on October 24 2020

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 28 2020 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 28 2021 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 4: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Page 4 of 4

PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT All property owners within 300 feet of the subject property (26 in total) were mailed a notice of public hearing No comments have been received for inclusion in this report All comments received by noon on Wednesday October 28th will be emailed to the Commission for review ahead of the public hearing and posted to the Cityrsquos website ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) The project is categorically exempt under Section 15303 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal is to construct a new single-family residence in an area that is currently zoned for residential use and is adequately served by public services STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Design Review Commission review the proposed project conduct a public hearing and adopt DRC Resolution 2020-12 finding the project exempt from CEQA and approving the project subject to conditions ATTACHMENTS 1 DRC Resolution 2020-12 approving DR12-18CC [DRAFT]

a Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval [DRAFT] 2 Maps amp Aerial Photos 3 DRC Resolution 2018-22 approving DR12-18

a Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval 4 Excerpt Minutes of DRC meeting October 9 2020 5 Staff Report of DRC meeting October 9 2020 6 Excerpt Minutes of DRC meeting November 26 2020 7 Staff Report of DRC meeting November 26 2020 8 Referral Agency Comments 9 DR12-18 Public Comment (2018) 10 DR12-18 Approved Plans 11 DR12-18CC Project Plans dated October 14 2020 12 Color and Material Board received October 21 2020

RESOLUTION 2020-12

BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18CC Alan Guy (OwnerApplicant) R-40 Zoning Request for a Change of Conditions to the approved application DR12-18 for the construction of a new 5083 sq ft one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24-10 on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 Change of Conditions is for increases in floor area architectural modifications colormaterial selection and rear yard improvements

WHEREAS on October 14 2020 Alan Guy filed an application requesting a Change of Conditions to the previous application DR12-18 for the construction of a single-family residence on an undeveloped parcel at APN 244-180-056 WHEREAS on October 16 2020 the application was deemed complete WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 New Construction or Conversion of small Structures

WHEREAS on October 16 2020 a notice for the October 28 2020 meeting date for this item was posted within 300 feet of the Project Site and mailed to property owners within a 300 foot radius of the Project Site

WHEREAS on October 28 2020 the Design Review Commission conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a written staff report and approved the revised project subject to conditions NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT

1 The Design Review Commission hereby finds that the recitals set forth above are true and corrected and are incorporated herein

2 All the facts contained in the staff report of October 28 2020 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by reference

3 The required findings to grant a Design Review Permit have been evaluated by the Design Review Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings In granting approval for projects which occur in single-family and multiple-family residential zoning districts as outlined in Section 6-271(A)(1 and 3-6) the hearing authority shall make all the following findings

a) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 2 of 4

anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

b) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography

orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

c) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the

design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be appropriate within this non-hillside property located in a valley of Lafayette

d) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and

coverage of plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height In addition to the findings required in Section 6-275(A) the hearing authority shall make the following findings for projects which occur in single-family residential zoning districts and exceeds 17 feet in height as outlined in Section 6-272(A)(4)

a) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

b) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 3 of 4

deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

c) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

d) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal

bull Involves the development of one single-family residence on a vacant lot in a residential zone

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves DR12-

18CC for a Design Review Permit 6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of October 2020 by the following vote to wit AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT APPROVED ________________________ Glenn Cass Vice Chair

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 4 of 4

ATTEST ________________________ Greg Wolff Planning and Building Services Director ATTACHMENT(S) Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2020-12

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18CC Guy

Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

bull Site plans elevations amp details received October 14 2020 bull Colors amp Materials Board received on October 24 2020

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 28 2020 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 28 2021 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 5: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

RESOLUTION 2020-12

BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18CC Alan Guy (OwnerApplicant) R-40 Zoning Request for a Change of Conditions to the approved application DR12-18 for the construction of a new 5083 sq ft one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24-10 on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 Change of Conditions is for increases in floor area architectural modifications colormaterial selection and rear yard improvements

WHEREAS on October 14 2020 Alan Guy filed an application requesting a Change of Conditions to the previous application DR12-18 for the construction of a single-family residence on an undeveloped parcel at APN 244-180-056 WHEREAS on October 16 2020 the application was deemed complete WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 New Construction or Conversion of small Structures

WHEREAS on October 16 2020 a notice for the October 28 2020 meeting date for this item was posted within 300 feet of the Project Site and mailed to property owners within a 300 foot radius of the Project Site

WHEREAS on October 28 2020 the Design Review Commission conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a written staff report and approved the revised project subject to conditions NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT

1 The Design Review Commission hereby finds that the recitals set forth above are true and corrected and are incorporated herein

2 All the facts contained in the staff report of October 28 2020 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by reference

3 The required findings to grant a Design Review Permit have been evaluated by the Design Review Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings In granting approval for projects which occur in single-family and multiple-family residential zoning districts as outlined in Section 6-271(A)(1 and 3-6) the hearing authority shall make all the following findings

a) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 2 of 4

anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

b) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography

orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

c) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the

design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be appropriate within this non-hillside property located in a valley of Lafayette

d) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and

coverage of plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height In addition to the findings required in Section 6-275(A) the hearing authority shall make the following findings for projects which occur in single-family residential zoning districts and exceeds 17 feet in height as outlined in Section 6-272(A)(4)

a) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

b) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 3 of 4

deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

c) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

d) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal

bull Involves the development of one single-family residence on a vacant lot in a residential zone

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves DR12-

18CC for a Design Review Permit 6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of October 2020 by the following vote to wit AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT APPROVED ________________________ Glenn Cass Vice Chair

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 4 of 4

ATTEST ________________________ Greg Wolff Planning and Building Services Director ATTACHMENT(S) Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2020-12

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18CC Guy

Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

bull Site plans elevations amp details received October 14 2020 bull Colors amp Materials Board received on October 24 2020

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 28 2020 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 28 2021 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 6: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 2 of 4

anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

b) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography

orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

c) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the

design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be appropriate within this non-hillside property located in a valley of Lafayette

d) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and

coverage of plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height In addition to the findings required in Section 6-275(A) the hearing authority shall make the following findings for projects which occur in single-family residential zoning districts and exceeds 17 feet in height as outlined in Section 6-272(A)(4)

a) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

b) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 3 of 4

deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

c) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

d) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal

bull Involves the development of one single-family residence on a vacant lot in a residential zone

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves DR12-

18CC for a Design Review Permit 6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of October 2020 by the following vote to wit AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT APPROVED ________________________ Glenn Cass Vice Chair

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 4 of 4

ATTEST ________________________ Greg Wolff Planning and Building Services Director ATTACHMENT(S) Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2020-12

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18CC Guy

Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

bull Site plans elevations amp details received October 14 2020 bull Colors amp Materials Board received on October 24 2020

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 28 2020 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 28 2021 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 7: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 3 of 4

deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

c) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

d) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal

bull Involves the development of one single-family residence on a vacant lot in a residential zone

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves DR12-

18CC for a Design Review Permit 6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of October 2020 by the following vote to wit AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT APPROVED ________________________ Glenn Cass Vice Chair

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 4 of 4

ATTEST ________________________ Greg Wolff Planning and Building Services Director ATTACHMENT(S) Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2020-12

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18CC Guy

Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

bull Site plans elevations amp details received October 14 2020 bull Colors amp Materials Board received on October 24 2020

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 28 2020 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 28 2021 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 8: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Design Review Commission DR12-18CC Guy Resolution 2020-12 October 28 2020

Page 4 of 4

ATTEST ________________________ Greg Wolff Planning and Building Services Director ATTACHMENT(S) Exhibit ldquoArdquo ndash Conditions of Approval

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2020-12

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18CC Guy

Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

bull Site plans elevations amp details received October 14 2020 bull Colors amp Materials Board received on October 24 2020

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 28 2020 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 28 2021 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 9: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2020-12

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18CC Guy

Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

bull Site plans elevations amp details received October 14 2020 bull Colors amp Materials Board received on October 24 2020

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 28 2020 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 28 2021 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 10: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 11: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

16 The applicant shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

17 The applicant shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

18 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

19 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 12: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18CC Page 4 of 4

20 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

21 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

22 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

23 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied DATE

STAFF -

- end -

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 13: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

copy 2012-2017 Digital Map Products All rights reserved 1

184 feet

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 14: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

Page 1 of 4

Design Review Commission Resolution No 2018-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING

DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a

new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

TP20-18 Matthew Pease R-40 Zoning Request for a Category II Tree Permit to remove three protected trees (an English Walnut measuring 29 dbh Deodar Cedar 24 dbh and a London Plane 6 dbh) on a

vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

RECITALS

WHEREAS on July 5 2018 the applicant submitted a request for a Design Review to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056 and

WHEREAS on July 26 2018 the application was deemed incomplete and

WHEREAS staff evaluated the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act

(ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined the project to be categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

WHEREAS on September 12 2018 the application was deemed complete and

WHEREAS on October 9 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the

public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission provided feedback to the applicant and continued the matter to November 13 2018 in order to allow the applicant to make modifications to the project

WHEREAS November 13 2018 the matter was continued to November 26 2018 due to the

length of the November 13 agenda WHEREAS on October 17 2018 the applicant and the City of Lafayette mutually agreed to extend

the time to consider the subject application by 90-days from November 11 2018 to February 9 2018 pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act

WHEREAS on November 26 2018 the Design Review Commission following notification to the public in the prescribed manner conducted a public hearing where it received written and oral testimony including a staff report After consideration and deliberation the Commission adopted Resolution No 2018-22 approving application DR12-18 based on the required findings and subject to conditions of approval NOW THEREFORE the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California finds and determines as follows

1 All the facts contained in the staff report of November 13 2018 and October 9 2018 are hereby adopted as the Commissionrsquos own findings of fact and incorporated into this resolution by

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 2 of 4

reference

2 This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures - Section 15303 as the project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zone property

3 The required findings including the findings required for design review general findings for

structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal have been evaluated by the Commission as follows

sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings

(1) The approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health safety and general welfare in that the project is designed to comply with the development standards applicable to the project site including but not limited to height setbacks and permitted use The project was referred to referral agencies who have not expressed any concerns regarding the proposal The project provides appropriate ingress and egress and is not anticipated to adversely impact the health welfare and safety of the neighborhood and broader community

(2) General site considerations including site layout open space and topography orientation and location of buildings vehicular access circulation and parking setbacks height walls fences public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development in that the project provides appropriate setbacks allowing the project to maintain privacy of the existing neighbors while providing sufficient private open space for its residents The project provides sufficient driveway access to the proposed garage and fire-truck turn-around area for safety purposes The proposed driveway has been submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department where the department had no objections to the proposed driveway configuration The project meets the required height setback and other development standards of the underlying zoning district and is consistent with the general plan

(3) General architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings building materials colors screening of exterior appurtenances exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings in that the project design contains a one-story pitched roof thatrsquos designed with farmhouse architectural design Staff finds the proposed color profile to be consistent with the natural features of the land the green toned colors contribute to reducing visibility and blending the development into the existing natural environment of the site and the existing and proposed vegetation

(4) General landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of

plant materials provisions for irrigation maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public in that the project provides a landscape plan that demonstrates the screening of the proposed residence with screening trees and drought tolerant plants providing privacy and visual relief to the subject property The project is conditioned to require tree protection fencing around existing trees to remain in order to reduce construction impacts to existing vegetation

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 3 of 4

sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height (1) The structure substantially complies with the Residential Design Guidelines in that the proposed

residence provides faccedilade articulation at the front and rear elevation to offer shadows and break up massing Application of materials color and roof design minimize impacts of mass and bulk and appropriately sets the building on-site Staff anticipates minimal visibility impacts due to the existing vegetation and proposed landscape plan

(2) The structure is so designed that it will appear compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood and will not significantly detract from the established character of the neighborhood in that the proposed project provides articulation outdoor patio deck and ranch style architectural design The design is compatible with the scale and style of the existing neighborhood

(3) The structure is so designed that it does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding

structures or topography when viewed from off-site in that the immediate neighborhood is comprised of a variety of one-story and two-story residences The proposed residence is one-story and is similar design and size as the existing adjacent homes The design of the structure does not appear too tall or massive in relation to surrounding structures or topography when viewed from off-site given the significant front setback separation for adjacent buildings as well as existing and proposed vegetation and

(4) The structure is so designed that it does not unreasonably reduce the privacy or views of adjacent properties in that the proposed house is one story screened by the proposed landscaping and is located on a relatively flat parcel that limits privacy impacts to adjacent properties

sect6-1707 Permit category II Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application

(1) Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property in that the removal of the proposed walnut trees is to construct the proposed residence and driveway entrance The removal of the walnut trees supports the development of the single-family residence and the driveway and the project is conditioned to provide the minimum amount of mitigation trees therefore staff believes this is a reasonable improvement

(2) Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that the removal of the proposed trees were evaluated by the Cityrsquos consulting arborist and verified that the improvements will impact the proposed trees to be removed Proposed disturbance of any other existing trees are required to be mitigated by adding tree protection fencing around the trees to be saved

(3) Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree in that developing the property with a home and driveway will require some form of tree removal Adjusting the grades would not prevent the trees from being removed Staff has conditioned the project to work with the Cityrsquos consulting Arborist to submit a revised landscape plan to incorporate appropriate mitigation trees to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

4 Based on the review of the entire record before the Design Review Commission the Commission

finds and determines the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under CEQA

Design Review Commission November 26 2018 Resolution 2018-22 DR12-18 Pease

Page 4 of 4

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New construction or conversion of small structures) as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property that is located in an urbanized area

5 Based on the above findings the Design Review Commission hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to conditions contained in Exhibit ldquoArdquo attached to this resolution

6 This resolution becomes effective upon its adoption

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Design Review Commission of the City of Lafayette California at a meeting held on November 26 2018 by the following vote AYES Cass Collins Fu Keppel Sim (5-0) NOES None ABSENT NA RECUSED NA ATTEST

___________________________ ________________________________ Niroop K Srivatsa Patrick Collins Planning amp Building Manager Design Review Commission Chair

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT ldquoArdquo OF DRC RESOLUTION 2018-22

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bull DR12-18 amp TP20-18 Project specific conditions of approval are shaded

ONGOING CONDITIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY

1 Development shall conform to the following approved plans on file at the City Offices as modified by these conditions

Site plans elevations amp details received November 15 2018

Colors amp Materials Board received on October 30 2018

Ongoing condition

2 Pursuant to sect6-250 of the Lafayette Municipal Code this approval shall expire one year from the approval date October 9 2018 unless a building permit has been issued for the project The Planning amp Building Department Director may extend the period to exercise the permit for up to one additional year October 9 2019 upon a showing of good cause if such request is received in writing prior to the expiration date

Ongoing condition

3 No changes shall be made to the approved plans or color and materials board without review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department andor appropriate commissions as determined by the Planning amp Building Department Director If changes are approved by the City the property owner shall prepare three sets of revised plans for review and approval by the Planning amp Building Department Once the revised plans are stamped ldquoapprovedrdquo the property owner shall submit the revised plans to the Lamorinda Building Inspection Office for their review and approval

Ongoing condition

4 Construction plans shall conform to the approved design drawings The property owner shall indicate to staff at the time of submittal for building permit plan check any and all modifications clarifications or changes on the construction drawings from the approved design drawings

Ongoing condition

5 Storage of construction materials portable toilets and debris must be stored and staged on the subject property for this project Temporary storage of construction boxes or construction materials must be kept on the property and out of any private easement or public right-of-way to permit emergency vehicle access during the construction project

Ongoing condition

6 Site improvement and construction work including set-up loading or unloading of materials or equipment or the maintenance refueling or tune-up of any equipment performed as part of this project is restricted to the hours between 800 am and 600 pm Monday through Saturday No noise-generating construction work shall be performed on Sundays or national holidays Violation of this condition may result in issuance of a Stop Work Order or administrative citations

Ongoing condition

7 The property owner shall defend indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lafayette its agents officers officials and employees from all claims demands law suits writs of mandamus and other actions or proceedings (collectively ldquoActionsrdquo) brought against the City or its agents officers officials or employees to challenge attack seek to modify set aside void or annul this approval In the event the City becomes aware of any such action the City shall promptly notify the property owner and shall cooperate fully in the defense It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld the legal counsel providing the Cityrsquos defense and the property owner shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses

Ongoing condition

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 2 of 4

directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the Course of the defense

8 These conditions of Project Approval include certain fees dedication requirements reservation requirements and other exactions Under Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedication reservations and other exactions which are imposed upon you Under Government Code Sections 66020(a) amp (d)(1) there is a 90-day period within which you may file and administrative protest of these fees dedications reservations and other exactions This 90-day period begins with the approval of the project If you fail to file a protest with the City Clerk within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020 you will be legally barred from later challenging such exaction

Ongoing condition

9 If the Planning amp Building Department either independently or as a result of complaints from the public becomes aware that these conditions of approval are being violated and Planning amp Building Department staff is unable to obtain compliance or abatement the City may issue a Stop Work Order andor pursue administrative remedies pursuant to chapters 1-3 and 1-9 of the Lafayette Municipal Code Administrative citations and fines may be issued for each day a violation occurs

Ongoing condition

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING BUILDING OR DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICHEVER IS FIRST

10 The property owner shall duplicate these conditions of approval set forth in this document ldquoExhibit Ardquo in the construction drawing plan sets for the benefit of the contractor(s) subcontractor(s) and inspector(s) All sheets in the construction drawings shall be the same size (eg 24rdquo by 36rdquo)

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

11 The property owner(s) shall enter into a standard landscape maintenance agreement with the City to install new and maintain existing landscaping and preserve and protect the trees on the property as indicated on the plans The project planner will prepare a standard landscape maintenance agreement and send it to the property owner(s) The agreement shall be signed and notarized and submitted to the Planning amp Building Department to be recorded against the property The agreement shall run with the property to ensure that future property owner(s) are aware of the requirement for ongoing maintenance of the existing and approved landscaping

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

12 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if the project is determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC The applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Planning amp Building Department on greenhalosystemscom The WMP packet may be downloaded from the City of Lafayette website wwwlovelafayetteorg gt Planning amp Permits gt Waste Management Plan

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

13 The property owner shall install a sign stating the allowed days and hours for construction which shall be posted in a conspicuous place along the front property line where it can be viewed by all contractors subcontractors and the general public The sign shall be 4 square feet and state the message below Lettering shall be at least three inches except for ldquoNo noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidaysrdquo which shall be at least 15 inches

HOURS OF

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 3 of 4

CONSTRUCTION Mon ndash Sat

800 AM ndash 600 PM No noise-generating construction on Sundays or national holidays

14 The property owner shall obtain review and approval by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District which is located at 40005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250 Concord CA 94520 Construction drawings shall have the Fire Protection District stamp and signature prior to submitting to the Lafayette Planning amp Building department

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

15 The property owner shall obtain review and approval from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction plans shall be stamped with the departmentrsquos approval The Central Sanitary District is located at 5019 Imhoff Place in Martinez and can be reached at (925) 229-7371 for requirements and permits

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

16 The property owner shall submit a revised landscape plan that reduces the number of moderate water usage plants listed on sheet L-40 ldquoLandscape Planrdquo to more drought tolerant species The result should be a cumulative reduction of the WELO calculation from 1000 gallons of water to a maximum of 750 gallons of water The final landscape plan is subject to review and approval by one Design Review Commissioner (Commissioner Cass) and the Planning Director

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

17 The property owner shall provide a site plan and grading plan showing the proposed tree protection measures per the City standard tree fencing detail A copy of this detail is available from Planning amp Building Department staff or by visiting wwwlovelafayetteorg gt City Departments gt Planning gt Planning Handouts gt Tree Protection Guidelines

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

18 The property owner shall plant 46 (15-gallon) mitigation trees or will be required to pay the in-lieu fee for the approved Tree Permit (TP20-18) authorizing removal of three protected trees A mitigation planting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to verify that the proposed planting locations and species are suitable for maintaining the new trees and preserving of the existing trees to the satisfaction of the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

19 The property owner shall provide drawings and specifications including planting details necessary for appropriate compliance with the C3 provisions as described in the Stormwater C3 Guidebook available at wwwcccleanwaterorgconstructionndphp Final plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FRAMINGrdquo STATUS

20 The property owner shall comply with the following

Review the project file and obtain copies as needed of the following Approved external light fixtures and locations Approved colors and materials Approved landscape plans Conditions of approval

Submit photos of the landscaping to verify that all proposed landscaping is still in place

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

Conditions of Approval bull DR12-18 Page 4 of 4

Sign the approved plans indicating that the above items were completed and that the property owner understands that the project will be completed in accordance to the approved plans

PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ldquoHOLD-ON-FINALrdquo STATUS AND FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION

21 The property owner shall install approved landscaping according to the approved landscape plans prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection Species identification tags shall remain on trees plants and shrubs for the benefit of the planner conducting the final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

22 The applicant shall submit a certification letter from the Landscape Architect or the representative that prepared the approved landscape plan(s) which verifies that installed landscaping complies with the approved landscape plan(s) prior to contacting the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department to schedule an inspection The certification letter shall verify that the species size quantity and location of approved trees shrubs and groundcover comply with the approved landscape plan(s) The certification letter shall also verify landscape lighting fencing irrigation and other details as applicable Once the certification letter has been submitted the project planner will also confirm the installation of the landscaping during the scheduled final inspection

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

23 The applicant shall submit a copy of the invoice listing the landscaping plants ordered for the project

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

24 The property owner shall contact the Lafayette Planning amp Building Department at least 72 hours prior to requesting a final building inspection from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department The property owner shall request an inspection of the project by Planning amp Building Department staff to confirm that all conditions of approval have been met and that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans Planning amp Building Department staff will release the ldquoHoldrdquo on the final building inspection when all conditions of approval have been met and a site inspection finds that the project was constructed in accordance with approved plans including but not limited to siting grading retaining walls tree protection measures location of windows amp doors and building color

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

25 The property owner and applicant shall comply with Chapter 5-6 Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling if this project was determined to be a covered project as defined in Section 5-603 LMC Prior to final inspection of a grading demolition andor building permit and within 30 days after project completion the applicant shall submit the WMP to the City through Green Halo Systems for final review

Satisfied

DATE

STAFF -

- end -

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins referred to photo 4 commenting that the shot should have been banked a bit 1 more to the left in order to show the proposed house site Mr Swatt asked about significant view 2 locations and where the Commission would like to see the views from Commission Chair Collins stated 3 that if the house cannot be seen from the major roads and does not loom over a neighboring home 4 there should not be much issue with visibility Commissioner Keppel indicated that he would actually 5 like to see this house at least partially Commission Chair Collins indicated that the scale and colors 6 were more of an issue if the house has greater visibility 7 8 Mr Swatt explained that the colors are not white and they can go deeper in tone as well Commissioner 9 Keppel commented that photographs of materials are not helpful to the Commission real samples are 10 preferred 11 12 Mr Evans viewed the house size a relatively smaller in that the footprint of the living area is only 4600-13 4700-sf with everything else tucked in under it including the 4-car garage Commission Chair Collins 14 said that the Commission considered a 4600 to 4700-sf home a relatively large house particularly on 15 a hillside site with a lot of paving and as the footprint grows so does the amount of water runoff 16 Commissioner Keppel agreed that at 7500 or 4600-sf it is a large house that is approvable as long as 17 built within the requirements However he reiterated that sustainability would be a key issue 18 19 Mr Evans assured that he wishes the home to be as energy efficient as possible using as little water as 20 possible 21 22 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS None 23 24 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 26 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 27 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 28 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-29 056 30 Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2018-22 approving the Design Review Permit subject to 31 conditions 32 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 33 34 Ms Reyes reported the applicant requests approval for a Design Review Permit Grading Permit and 35 Tree Permit to construct a new 5083-sf one-story single family residence with a maximum ridge height 36 of 24rsquo10rdquo requiring grading of 51-cy and the removal of three protected trees on a vacant lot The 37 subject property is located north of Happy ValleyGlen Road and 870 feet north of the Lafayette BART 38 station 39 40 Planning staff found the project conforms with the Residential Design Guidelines with the addition of a 41 few project specific conditions of approval 42

bull Submittal of a revised landscape plan to provide screening trees to screen the adjacent 43 neighbors to the east and south of the property 44

bull Review and approval of the proposed driveway configuration by the Fire Department for 45 emergency vehicle access 46

bull Revise the rear elevation to break up the mass of the proposed residence 47 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins was concerned the proposed driveway circle would not be approved by the 1 Fire Department and asked if it needed anything more than a hammerhead turnaround at the street 2 Ms Reyes said the application was submitted to the Fire Department and Planning staff had not 3 received comments at this time Mr Wolff advised that a driveway in excess of 150-feet requires a fire 4 turnaround The measurement is taken from the point where an apparatus is staged with a 150rsquo hose 5 pull 6 7 Matt Pease property owner and applicant was present with his wife Leslie They are 30-year Lafayette 8 residents and Leslie is a local business owner Mr and Mrs Pease are building the house as their 9 residence Their current home is on a hillside on St Maryrsquos Road and they desire a level home on a flat 10 lot They have met with almost all of their future neighbors Mr Pease noted that in Planning staffrsquos 11 report there was a public comment letter from one neighbor (Doyle) who had privacy concerns They 12 have since met with the neighbors and addressed their concerns The neighbors were present at the 13 meeting and have submitted a letter indicating their approval of the project as proposed Mr Pease 14 stated the feedback from other neighbors has also been very positive 15 16 Commission Chair Collins asked if Mr Pease was amenable to the proposed condition of approval to add 17 the dormers on the west side Mr Pease said their plan was to have solar on the rear facing roof His 18 concern about the dormers was they would inhibit their ability to place solar panels there 19 20 Commission Chair Collins commented that the 1212 roof pitch is very steep for a solar panel Mr Pease 21 indicated they have not yet done the engineering for the solar system Commission Chair Collins advised 22 that in general the more vertical the roof the less efficient the solar system 23 24 John Newton project designer was aware that solar panels are less efficient at steeper angles however 25 the property owners liked the farmhouse style The main design element was the front wraparound 26 porch but Mr Newton felt it was important to get the steep attic that frames the house He felt they 27 had been successful in the orientation of the porch and front door with the side garage Mr Newton 28 was open to adding dormers to the rear roof elevation but preferred not to as they felt unnecessary as 29 they would be going into the attic space They planned to vault some of the major interior ceilings into 30 that attic space with the rest of the space for mechanical purposes Mr Newton did not think adding 31 dormers was critical to the design of the home 32 33 Commissioner Keppel asked about the proposed material for the driveway David Thorne landscape 34 architect referred to images of materials submitted and stated it is a permeable driveway paver 35 (Belgard) 36 37 Commissioner Sim asked if Mr Newton was a licensed architect for the State of California Mr Newton 38 said he was not Commissioner Sim noted the cover sheet for the submittal listed him as architect and 39 requested a correction of it 40 41 Commissioner Sim asked how Mr Newton would mask the rear roof area to articulate the roofline 42 Commissioner Sim agreed with Planning staffrsquos recommendation Mr Newton thought they could 43 mimic what was done on the front to add articulation 44 45 Commission Chair Collins noted the house runs northsouth and the applicant planned to put solar 46 panels on a 45-degree angle on the east side of the house He indicated an eastern placement on a 47 vertical was not a good solution The best location would west or south and tilted no more than 22-48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 11 October 9 2018

degrees Mr Newton thought they could look at the right side at the rear where the panels would not 1 be as visual when approaching the house Commissioner Sim said he does a lot of solar panels for 2 school districts and other places and supported Commission Chair Collinsrsquo recommendation in order to 3 maximize the return 4 5 Mr Thorne offered the following information in support of the application 6

bull Driveway ndash the purpose of the circular drive was due to the lack of on street parking and a 7 desire to create a functional driveway with extra guest parking There is also a small turnaround 8 for cars to back into 9

bull Landscape lighting is minimal with only path lights and a few down lights 10 bull Design vocabulary ndash the materials package is very indicative of the farmhouse style seen in this 11

area of Lafayette 12 bull Replacement tree calculation ndash There are two trees (London plane and deodar cedar) that are 13

totally deformed and being removed They will be replaced with native plants They are also 14 removing three walnut trees 15

bull Planting plan ndash all California natives are shaded in light green The area fronting Happy Valley is 16 predominantly native species 17

bull The City Landscape Consultantlsquos report indicated that some of the proposed trees would not be 18 of stature The applicant will bring in a 48-inch Live oak and will provide sufficient screening for 19 the house The applicant will address the condition of approval to add more screen trees 20 however the applicant has done a pretty good job to screen the project without over-planting 21 it 22

23 Mr Wolff asked for clarification of existing and new fences Mr Thorne advised there is a proposed 24 white picket fence 4 feet high around the vegetable garden The fence at the front of the property will 25 be the white frame with hog wire The north side fence will be a 6 foot high white picket fence 26 paralleling the neighborrsquos driveway and makes closure with an existing fence in the rear The south 27 fence is existing The rear fence is a new 6 foot good neighbor fence 28 29 Mr Wolff questioned the ability of a car to turn into the turnaround space and asked if there was a 30 template that illustrates that move can be made Mr Thorne thought the issue needed further study 31 32 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment 33 34 Brian Vesce a Happy Valley Road resident was present with his wife Ali Mr and Mrs Vesce are the 35 rear neighbors of the subject property Mr and Mrs Pease met with them early in the process and got 36 them up to speed on the plans After reviewing the plans and seeing the design they are very happy 37 with the style of the home Mr Vesce said the property owners were very receptive in working with 38 them in preserving their privacy 39 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about Mr Vescersquos feelings regarding the roof he will see from his home 41 Mr Vesce felt there are things that can be done to preserve his privacy and the aesthetics of the design 42 which he was confident they will figure out Mr Vesce commented that the subject property owners 43 are good people and they were excited to have them as neighbors 44 45 Mr Pease thanked the neighbor for his comments 46 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 October 9 2018

Commission Chair Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 1 2 Commissioner Cass was concerned about the roof and solar system He did not see a good practical 3 solution for the solar and indicated if a pool is installed Commissioner Cass will want solar heating He 4 commented that the service turnout did not appear to be workable as shown and suggested they need 5 to move the fence up to accommodate it Commissioner Cass did not like the idea of so much 6 pavement even though it would be permeable He also disliked the circular driveway due to the 7 amount of pavement and did not see that a fire truck would be able to negotiate it Commissioner Cass 8 commented that the three-car garage and turnaround area behind was sufficient area for guests to park 9 on Looking at the landscape plan Commissioner Cass did not think it was a very good water-saving 10 plan with 33 of the shrubs being moderate water users He thought that percentage was too high 11 Commissioner Cass commented that the shrubs on the north end near the neighborsrsquo Valley oak appear 12 to be a little close to those trees At his house the space required between the tree trunk and plantings 13 was 10 feet Given the density of the proposed plantings Commissioner Cass thought it looked like 14 instant landscaping He felt the plant density was too high noting that some of the plants have a radius 15 of up to 30 feet and are being planted 4 feet apart As a result Commissioner Cass found it to be over-16 landscaped with too much water consumption Commissioner Cass liked the blue stone at the rear of 17 the house but commented that the back patio area off the swimming pool needs to be broken up so 18 that it will not all be impermeable Commissioner Cass added that the groundcover and lawn will use 19 too much water He thought the landscape plan should be scaled back and use a lot more California 20 natives 21 22 Commissioner Sim shared Planning staffrsquos concern about the rear elevation and the solar panels He 23 thought the rear elevation deserved a lot more effort to break up the roof mass with dormers or some 24 other solution Commissioner Sim concurred that the circular drive could be eliminated or made really 25 stealthy Overall he thought it was a nice project 26 27 Commissioner Keppel commented that the driveway is excessive in both the roundabout and the area in 28 front of the garage He did not think the Fire Department would approve that configuration and 29 requested the Fire Departmentrsquos comments be requested as a condition of approval Commissioner 30 Keppel said the solar solution needed to be thought out and drawn He suggested a condition of 31 approval would be submittal of a plan how the solar would work Commissioner Keppel noted the 32 elevations on L301 were mislabeled and should be corrected He commented that the rear elevation 33 was missing something with way too much roof going on there Commissioner Keppel suggested the 34 simple answer would be to take the area over the porch and somehow articulate it 35 36 Commissioner Fu echoed his fellow Commissionersrsquo comments indicating that all of their points were 37 key Commissioner Fu asked if the applicant had actual material samples He commented their 38 submittal was simulated copies and the Design Review Commission preferred to see actual materials 39 Submittal of material samples could be a condition of approval Commissioner Fu had no issue with the 40 color palette submitted He also had no issue with the light fixture selections and confirmed with the 41 applicant they are all dark sky compliant He reiterated Commission Chair Collinsrsquos comment that the 42 impervious surface back by the pool is extensive Added to the impervious footprint of the home it will 43 create a large mass of impervious land He suggested considering how to break up some of that 44 material Commissioner Fu was also concerned about the potentially excessive amount of water usage 45 for the lawn and meadow area 46 47 Commission Chair Collins supported the previous comments He recommended the following 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 October 9 2018

bull Driveway revision 1 bull Review of the landscaping to reduce impervious surfaces 2 bull The rear east side of the house needs review and revision (dormers or something else) 3 bull It appears there is quite a bit of landscape lighting and it seems excessive 4 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish instead of painted 5

6 Commission Chair Collins moved to continue DR12-18 to Tuesday November 13 2018 to allow the 7 applicant time to address the comments and recommendations of the Design Review Commission as 8 follows 9

bull Review and revise the driveway and service turnaround 10 bull Revise the landscape plan per the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments 11 bull Review the amount of landscape lighting and reduce it 12 bull Reduce the amount of impervious surface by the pool 13 bull The hog fence should have a natural redwood finish 14 bull Review and revise the east elevation to add articulation to the roof area 15 bull Show how they will address the solar panels 16 bull Provide additional tree screening along the rear property edge 17 bull Submit material samples 18

19 Commissioner Keppel seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 20 21 9 OTHER BUSINESS 22 23 A House Size Discussion Mr Wolff advised that the issue was discussed at a prior 24 meeting and the Design Review Commissionrsquos thinking was to have the ability to have a fee or other 25 financial requirement tied to larger homes that could go towards affordability Planning staff has posed 26 that idea to the City Attorneyrsquos office who is researching it As a result discussion of this plan is on hold 27 pending that review 28 29 Commissioner Cass commented the only other thing to discuss was whether anything exists that can 30 regulate water usage Commission Chair Collins understood that development applications needed 31 review by EBMUD He indicated he would research this issue 32 33 Mr Wolff advised the Planning Department is bringing forward at the instigation of the Environmental 34 Task Force a water efficient landscape ordinance which has been in effect at the state level for some 35 time The recommendation is to adopt the state ordinance by reference and implement it locally 36 Under the ordinance there will be calculation sheet of water usage and an annual water budget to be 37 complied with Commission Chair Collins asked what the calculation would be based upon and Mr 38 Wolff explained it is a function of area and intensity of the water demand The proposed ordinance is 39 targeted to go to the Planning Commission and the City Council this fall 40 Commission Chair Collins asked about progress on the objective design standards Mr Wolff said a 41 consultant has been retained with an internal launch meeting scheduled for next week Commission 42 Chair Collins hoped that an objective house size would be considered in that review 43 Commissioner Cass commented that his biggest concern in establishing house size fees is that it seems 44 that if someone was willing to pay the price it would indicate pre-approval Commission Chair Collins 45 hoped that the Residential Design Guidelines would still have some control over siting massing and 46 design in relation to the surrounding area 47

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date October 9 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline November 11 2018 (without PSA extension)

Summary The project involves constructing a new 5083-sq ft (including 854-sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo and various outdoor living spacesimprovements Staff finds the project can be approved based on the findings and recommends approval of the subject application subject to conditions

History On September 21 2000 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a request for a minor subdivision (MS501-00) that consisted of merging 3 parcels totaling 24-acres into 2 reconfigured parcels and variance request to reduce the required 40000-sq ft lot to 35560-sqft located at 3654 Happy Valley Road The subejct property is designated as Parcel A of the 2 reconfigured lots Project specific conditions of the minor subdivision include a requirement that plans proposed for a new home on either new lot must be reviewed and approved by Design Review Commisison The review includes siting colors and materials replacement trees lost due to development landscaping and irrigtation plans etc A detailed conditions of approval and vesting tentative tract map are included as Attachment 4 to this report for reference

Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a new 5-083-sq ft single-story single family residence with various outdoor living areas requiring removal of three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading equivalent to 51 cubic yards on a vacant parcel The site has limited off-site visibility due to the relatively flat site and proposed landscape plan The interior of the proposed residence consists of four bedrooms three bathrooms and common living areas such as kitchen dining room living room and family room The maximum ridge height is proposed to be 24rsquo-10 The garage is 854 sq ft and additional parking is provided in the circular driveway entrance located in the front yard Access to the site is proposed to remain at the northwest corner of the parcel and a security keypad is available for access to the driveway entrance The driveway round-about and area in front of the garage is proposed as a fire truck turn-around to support emergency vehicular access The outdoor living areas include a pool pool deck outdoor patio area with BBQ set vegetable garden and trellis

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 2 of 7

Triggers

Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cuyds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Site Conditions and Location The subject property is located north of Happy Valley Glen Road and east of Happy Valley Road The property is approximately 870-feet north of the Lafayette BART station The parcel is very gently sloped to the southwest but overall relatively flat The subject property contains 13 trees and 2 protected trees are proposed to be removed Additional details of the site conditions are summarized in the table below

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The project proposes to be designed to meet the following policies of the General Plan

Policy LU-13 Privacy Development shall respect the privacy of neighbors The proposed residence is developed as a one-story and substantially screened with trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy

Policy LU-11 Scale Development shall be compatible with the scale and pattern of existing neighborhoods The residence is proposed to be developed as a one-story with natural warm colors to match the environmental setting

The zoning for the subject property is Single-Family Residential-40 (R-40) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft which is the minimum lot size for this zoning district Additional project consistency items are evaluated below with the prescribed zoning standards outlined in the following table

APN 244-180-056

Lot Area 101-acres (43996 sq ft)

Zoning amp Overlay Districts Single-family Residential District-40 (R-40)

General Plan Designation Low Density Single Family Residential (up to two dwelling unitsacre)

Topography Gently sloping to the southwest overall flat parcel

Existing Use Vacant land

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 3 of 7

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces Two spaces

SitingVisual Impacts The new one-story single-family residence is proposed to be 5083-sq ft with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo developed on a vacant 101-acre parcel The proposed residence is designed to be parallel to the street frontage and is considered a valleyinfill site The surrounding environment consists of a variety of one- and two-story residences and the subject parcel is a vacant lot with associated trees The proposed residence would be located on the southeast portion of the site and situated 73rsquo from the street frontage on Happy Valley Road Staff is in support of the siting of the building as this meets the Residential Design Guidelines for new homes within valley and infill areas for the following reasons

1 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(d) - Site buildings to preserve visually established front and side yard setbacks The proposed residence is set back from the street and establishes a front yard setback that reduces massing of the structure The proposed residence does not loom over the street thus preserving the visually established front yard setback

2 Residential Design Guideline II(A)(1)(c) ndash When siting buildings and their associated outdoor living and service areas respect the privacy and views of existing adjacent residences The rear yard of the proposed residence abuts the front yard of the adjacent existing residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road (Lot B) The proposed landscape plan would sufficiently screen the associated outdoor living areas and residence The landscape plan includes a variety of shrubs and screening trees including multiple purple leaf plum and a coast live oak The existing walnut tree would be preserved and screen the master bedroom windows that face the adjacent property Therefore staff anticipates minimal privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor

Story poles were erected 14-calendar days prior to the public hearing scheduled for October 9 2018 Staff conducted a site visit to evaluate the siting and massing of the residence and found that the proposed residence is situated away from the street frontage and closest to the rear yard neighbor The proposed landscape plan with the incorporated recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant would sufficiently screen the new residence and privacy impacts of the adjacent neighbor would be minimal Recommendations from the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant include one or two additional Arbutus Marina along the southeastern property line or as an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Additional recommendations are discussed in the Landscape section below Story pole photos are included as Attachment 6 for reference

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 4 of 7

Privacy and Neighborhood Impacts Staff evaluated the proposed development and anticipates minimal privacy impacts of the adjacent property owners because of the proposed landscape plan and the relatively flat topography of the site The neighbor (3654 Happy Valley Road) that is closest to the proposed residence is at a slightly higher elevation and 62rsquo from the nearest proposed trellis The rear yard of the proposed residence is facing the front yard of the closest residence at 3654 Happy Valley Road The outdoor living spaces that are near this neighbor would be the pool and vegetable garden The pool is outside of the required rear yard setback and is considered a more active outdoor use but would be screened by the proposed trees and shrubs to protect neighbor privacy The vegetable garden is within the required 20rsquo rear yard setback but is considered a passive outdoor use and would not pose an impact to the adjacent residences The floor plan that is facing the 3654 Happy Valley Road residence shows the closest room to be a master bedbathroom Staff anticipates minimal privacy to the adjacent neighbors because the proposed room is a passive living space where residents would usually go for privacy rather to gather in large groups During the initial review of the application staff found the rear roofline lacked design and articulation as required in the Residential Design Guidelines and recommended a design revision to break up massing The applicant indicated a desire to install a roof-mounted PV system (solar array) and that the roof design is required to support the proposed panels Staff recommends a condition to revise the rear elevation to add two dormers to project vertically beyond the plane of the roof pitch and break up massing of this elevation The rear elevation is provided as reference below

Rear Elevation

Circulation amp Parking Access to the site is available from Happy Valley Road and the driveway entrance is proposed to be gated with a security keypad The driveway is shown to be constructed as pervious pavers with thick stone bedding and base to allow for permeability The circular driveway leads to the the front door of the residence and loops around to allow vehicles to exit or access the garage on the northeast corner of the site The garage is 854-sq ft and would provide a minimum of two parking spaces The circular driveway is located outside of the required 25rsquo front yard setback and may also be used as parking for the residence or visitors if the Fire Department does not require this as emergency vehicle access If the Fire Department reviews the proposed circular driveway and does not require this design for emergency access then parking is permitted However if not required for fire Engineering may request additional vegetation rather than paving for this driveway As a condition of approval the proposed driveway configuration will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department to verify sufficient fire-truck turnaround space and emergency vehicle access

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 5 of 7

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping The proposed single-story single-family residence outdoor living spaces and on-site improvements such as driveway entrance and storm water treatment areas require removal of trees The project site is scattered with 14 trees which include 6 Valley Oaks 3 Black Walnuts 3 English Walnuts 1 Deodar Cedar and 1 London Plane tree A total of five trees are proposed to be removed to support the construction of the proposed residence and driveway Three of those five trees are considered protected (native) species to the City of Lafayette which include 2 English Walnuts and 1 black walnut The removal of any protected tree that is over 6rdquo in diameter requires planting of either two 15-gallon trees of native species or an acceptable equivalent The applicant proposes to provide 27 trees as mitigation trees to compensate for the removal of the three protected trees The applicant is required to plant a minimum of forty-six (46) 15-gallon trees to meet the code-required mitigation requirement The project is conditioned to provide the appropriate mitigation trees or pay an in-lieu fee The Cityrsquos consulting arborist provided recommendations to provide additional screening of the proposed residence Staff has included a condition to direct the applicant to revise the landscape plan to incorporate the recommendations made by the Cityrsquos Landscape Consultant to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Director

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that requires a total of 51 CY of cut and fill The applicant provides a Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set that demonstrates the reasoning for cut and fill on the property The majority of the cut and fill would occur to support the driveway by the garage and the driveway gate Drainage of the site will be evaluated by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer to further demonstrate compliance of drainage on site

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Public Comment Outreach and Notice Property owners (26) within 300rsquo of the subject property were mailed a notice of public hearing and the immediate area was posted at least ten days prior to this scheduled public hearing Two public

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report October 9 2018

Page 6 of 7

comments were received during the preparation of this staff report The two comments raised concerns of the design of the home in regard to the height and the windows on the south elevation The figure below provides the location of the two public commenters

Agency Response The project plans were referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) At the time of preparation of this staff report four comments were received and are attached to this report as attachment 5 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height permit category II tree removal and grading of gt50 cubic yards The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Page 7 of 7

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed development conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution 2018-22 approved the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments

1 Resolution 2018-22 amp ldquoExhibit Ardquo COArsquos 2 Aerial Images 3 Arborist Report 4 MS501-00 Approval amp Map 5 Referral Comments 6 Story Pole Photos 2018925 7 Public Comments 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180912

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14 November 26 2018

Design Review Commission to enforce those conditions for an area under 1000-sf and letting large 1 masses go 2 3 Commission Chair Collins disagreed strongly with the applicantrsquos comment that to do what was 4 approved would be punitive at this juncture 5 6 Mr Wolff stated with regard to the comments about the County Inspector that it was his understanding 7 that no inspection had been called for yet He noted that when the County Inspector finds a deviation 8 from approved plans that an applicant is referred back to the City and the City is obliged to consider it 9 Mr Wolff further stated there are one or more Residential Design Guidelines that speak specifically to 10 minimizing impervious surface He advised that the Design Review Commission had the option to 11 approve the applicantrsquos change of condition request to approve with conditions to continue the 12 matter or to deny the request 13 14 Commission Chair Collins moved to deny DR25-14CCDR14-16CC Commissioner Cass seconded the 15 motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 16 17 6 STUDY SESSIONS None 18 19 7 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 21 A DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review 22 Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence 23 with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-24 056 25 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 26 2018-22 approving the project subject to conditions 27 Project Planner Brianne Reyes 28 29 Ms Allen presented the Planning staff report for project planner Brianne Reyes Ms Allen reported the 30 application is for a new family residence on a vacant parcel The application is subject to design review 31 for structures over 17 feet in height The Design Review Commission reviewed the application at the 32 October 9 2018 meeting and provided comments to the applicant as outlined in Planning staffrsquos report 33 which included 34

bull Driveway reconfiguration - The original proposed circular driveway has been modified to 35 remove the circular component The Design Review Commission also requested that the 36 driveway configuration be reviewed by the Contra Costa Fire District and the Fire District has 37 approved the revisions Ms Allen noted that the driveway and turnaround areas are proposed 38 as permeable pavers 39

bull Revisions to the rear (east) elevation to articulate the expanse of the roof massing - The 40 applicant has added a dormer to that elevation to break up the expanse of the roofline 41

bull Submittal of a solar plan ndash The applicant has removed solar from the project 42 bull Service turnout ndash The applicant was requested to demonstrate that service vehicles could 43

access the site given the proposed entrance gate and the applicant has provided that 44 information 45

bull Submittal of a physical colors and material board ndash The applicant has provided that information 46 at this meeting No changes have been made 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14 November 26 2018

bull Landscaping ndash The Design Review Commission requested a reduction in the planting plan as 1 well as additional native plants plan revision to space out the shrubs and trees and keeping 2 irrigation 10-ft from existing oaks and clear of mulch Reduced planting plan to decrease 3 density of plants and included more low water use plants Submitted WELO calculation 4

bull Reduce the amount of exterior lighting ndash The applicant reduced the quantity of exterior lighting 5 from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes 6

bull Fencing color change ndash The applicant has changed the color from a white color to a natural 7 stained redwood 8

bull Reduce or eliminate rear yard impervious surface by adding permeable pavers ndash The applicant 9 has reduced the total impervious surface outside of building footprint from 2097-sf to 983-sf 10

11 Planning staff could make the required findings and found the applicantrsquos plan modifications responsive 12 to the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments Recommendation was made for approval of the 13 application subject to conditions of approval 14 15 Matt Pease property owner was present at the meeting with his wife Leslie Mr Pease said they took 16 the Design Review Commissionrsquos comments very seriously met with staff regarding different ways to 17 approach it and made modifications as noted in terms of reduced vegetation hardscape and lighting 18 They modified the rear architectural detail the driveway configuration and the fencing detail Mr Pease 19 hoped the changes made met with the Design Review Commissionrsquos expectations 20 21 John Newton project designer stated that a shed dormer was added to the rear elevation which he felt 22 had the right scale for the project Referring to the colors and materials board Mr Newton said that 23 the artisan siding is thicker that allows all the exterior corners to be mitered 24 25 David Thorne project landscape architect added with regard to the exterior materials that the Loon 26 Lake stone will be a vertical wall around the rear terrace that works well in terms of color with the 27 Bluestone He highlighted the following modifications 28

bull The newly configured driveway has been reviewed and approved by the Fire District The result 29 of this modification is a smaller driveway with less permeable pavement 30

bull Water usage ndash A preliminary WELO plan was prepared that shows compliance with the water 31 budget that would be assigned for the project (Sheet L41) 32 33

Commissioner Keppel asked about the reason for the solar being removed Mr Pease responded that 34 after some preliminary work they were not 100 certain they could make solar economically feasible 35 due to the position of the house and the trees While not ruled out Mr Pease said it was borderline 36 unlikely at this time 37 38 Commissioner Sim asked about the detailing at the front porch and how it transitions outward Mr 39 Thorne said there will be a peninsula of impermeable pavers moving to a splayed out section in the 40 Bluestone 41 42 Commission Chair Collins opened the hearing to public comment Hearing none Commission Chair 43 Collins closed the public hearing and called for Commission comment and action 44 45 Commissioner Cass liked the change in architecture that serves to break up the roof mass Based on the 46 Fire Districtrsquos review and approval he was satisfied with the driveway design However Commissioner 47

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14 November 26 2018

Cass did not think the turnaround at the gate would be very functional He was happy with the 1 reduction in the lighting fixtures Commissioner Cass acknowledged the changes in the landscape plan 2 but still had concerns He noted that the WELO calculations show use of almost 1000-gal per day and 3 he could not make the finding that it is a drought tolerant plan at that level Commissioner Cass thought 4 the irrigation levels needed further reduction and pointed out there are still a lot of proposed plants in 5 the moderate water category He saw little to no change in that plant category While the plants have 6 been spread out and moved away from the trees as requested Commissioner Cass still found an 7 overabundance of more water intensive plants He suggested a level closer to 750-gal per day or 8 alternatively introduction of a gray water system for irrigation With regard to the elimination of the 9 solar Commissioner Cass could not approve a plan with a pool without solar He suggested that either 10 the solar needed to be worked out or the pool needs to be eliminated 11 12 Commissioner Sim supported Commissioner Cassrsquos comments He felt that the front area showed very 13 difficult maneuvering still at the gate area He assumed that guest parking was desired at the front 14 porch area Commissioner Sim would rather see more landscape in that area unless it is needed for fire 15 turnaround Architecturally Commissioner Sim commented that the additional dormer does break up 16 the mass in a very simple way 17 18 Commissioner Keppel appreciated the applicantrsquos response to Commission comments He thought the 19 architectural modification was appropriate Commissioner Keppel was also concerned about the water 20 usage and implored the applicant to try and make the solar work He found the driveway 21 reconfiguration a big improvement but felt that the area by the front porch probably didnrsquot need to be 22 that big but thought the proposal was very close 23 24 Commissioner Fu supported the previous comments He asked and the applicant confirmed that all of 25 the exterior light fixtures are dark sky compliant Commissioner Fu was confused about Fixture C 26 (garden light fixture) and Mr Thorne explained that the fixture is an under-mount fixture that fits under 27 the cap of a 2rdquox6rdquo and points down Commissioner Fu asked whether all the fixturersquos calculations abide 28 with Title 24 for energy use for the whole project Mr Thorne indicated that all of the fixtures are LED 29 and on timersswitches The Title 24 calculations for the house have not yet been done Commissioner 30 Fu cautioned that there may be some adjustments necessary when all is completed 31 32 Mr Wolff referred to the question about the turnaround movement at the front gate and asked the 33 applicant to address it Mr Thorne stated that the hammerhead was a direct result of the fire 34 turnaround and they would not be pushing the pavement any closer to the porch to gain any extra 35 parking Mr Newton confirmed that the Fire District provides the dimensions for the size of the 36 hammerhead He added that the turnaround area in front of the gate is intended as a turnaround for 37 vehicles coming to the house that are not able to enter the gate They have moved the entry gate 38 further up the driveway by approximately 6 feet to allow for more room 39 40 Mr Pease addressed the issue of solar stating that the City does not currently require solar for a home 41 He said they were not sure that solar work out economically and was concerned about a requirement 42 being placed on the project Commissioner Keppel acknowledged that solar is not a requirement but 43 rather a recommendation as the Design Review Commission is looking for more energy efficiency as 44 house sizes grow 45 46 Commission Chair Collins was happy with the changes made commenting that the driveway 47 configuration is improved as well as the architecture He agreed that the landscape is a little robust and 48

Design Review Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14 November 26 2018

felt the guidance provided by Commissioner Cass was appropriate Commission Chair Collins would also 1 like to see solar used because the proposal includes a pool if feasible 2 3 Commissioner Cass could not justify in this day and age an overabundance of energy consumption 4 Understanding that solar is not required under Title 24 at this point in time there is an allowance to 5 request conservation efforts 6 7 Commission Chair Collins asking the applicant to look at the possibility of solar and to provide evidence 8 of why it does not work He did not feel the Design Review Commission should be telling applicants to 9 do something that does not make economic sense Commissioner Cass agreed but felt the solution 10 would be to remove the pool 11 12 Ms Allen directed the Design Review Commission to the required findings indicating that any approval 13 with conditions or denial would need to relate specifically to the required findings Commissioner Cass 14 asked whether there was a basis to deny the application because it does not have solar Ms Allen 15 replied that under current regulations there was no basis to deny because of no solar but she advised 16 that the Environmental Task Force has been considering such regulations 17 18 Commissioner Cass stated that while in principal he was opposed to approving a plan including a pool 19 without solar he acknowledged that solar would not feasibly work for this project based on the 20 proposed roof plan 21 22 Commissioner Cass moved to approve DR12-18 subject to the conditions of approval with further a 23 further condition of approval as follows 24

bull Submittal of a modified landscape plan that reduces water usage to approximately 750-gal per 25 day or alternatively includes a gray water system to be reviewed and approved by Commissioner 26 Cass This condition of approval was based on sect6-275(A) (4) with regard to providing a sufficient 27 number of drought tolerant plants 28

29 Commissioner Sim seconded the motion which carried by unanimous consent (5-0-0) 30 31 Commission Chair Collins advised of the 14-day appeal period 32 33 8 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 35 A HDP29-18 amp TP37-18 Miramar Homebuilders (OwnerApplicant) R-20 Zoning Request 36 for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit for the construction of a new 4800 sq ft single-family 37 residence that will require a Tree Permit for the removal of 11 protected trees and a Grading Permit for 38 1800 CY of earth movement (1200 cut 600 fill) on a vacant unaddressed parcel in the Hillside Overlay 39 District on Kim Road APN 167-040-023 40 Recommendation Consider the matter find the project exempt from CEQA and adopt Resolution 41 2018-26 approving the project subject to conditions 42 Project Planner Eric Singer 43 44 Mr Wolff presented the Planning staff report for project planner Eric Singer Mr Wolff reported the 45 application is for a Phase II Hillside Development Permit The Phase I siting and massing determination 46 was approved by the Planning Commission earlier this year Planning staff found that the Phase II 47 application complies with the Phase I approval for siting massing and building envelope There were 48

City of Lafayette

Design Review Commission Staff Report

Meeting Date November 26 2018

Staff Brianne Reyes Contract Planner

Subject DR12-18 Mathew amp Leslie Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Request for Design Review Permit to construct a new 5083-sq ft (including 854 sq ft garage) one-story single-family residence with a maximum ridge height of 24rsquo-10rdquo on a vacant parcel at 3654 Happy Valley Road APN 244-180-056

Statutory Deadline February 9 2018 (with PSA extension)

Summary The project as desribed above was reviewed by the Design Review Commission on October 9 2018 and feedback was provided to the applicant This report provides an overview of the modifications made to the project since the last hearing Staff finds the applicant has responded to the Commissionrsquos concerns and is able to make the required findings for approval

Proposal The revised plans propose to construct the same size single-family residence with similar outdoor living areas requiring removal of the same three protected trees (TP20-18) and grading reduced to 482 cubic yards from the plan reviewed at the Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 The revisions to the plan set requested by the Commission were mainly site design and circulation improvements Details of the revised plans are further analyzed in this staff report

Triggers Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No

Within a protected ridgeline setback Grading gt 50 cu yds

Within 100-ft of a ridgeline setback DR required as condition of approval

In the Hillside Overlay District In a commercial or MFR zone

Over 17-ft in height to ridge Variance requested

Development gt 6000 sq ft Tree Permit Requested

Creek Setback required Subject to Public Art Ordinance

Stormwater Control Plan required Second Unit Permit required

Design Review Commission Comments On October 9 2018 the project was presented to the Design Review Commission where the Commission recommended that the project be continued to November 13 2018 directing the applicant to address several concerns The table below outlines the Commissionrsquos comments and the applicantrsquos response

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 2 of 6

DRC Comment Applicant Response

Driveway Configuration Reducerevise the design layout of the circular driveway to reduce the extent of paving and provide for adequate emergency vehicle access resident and guest parking Submit revised drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to DRCrsquos review

Revised the design of the driveway to include a reduction of paving and removed circular configuration Submitted the revised drawings and the previous drawings to the Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval

Architectural Elevations Revise the rear (east) elevation to break up and articulate the roof and reduce roof massing

Revised rear (east) elevation to include one dormer

Solar Submit a conceptual solar panel installation plan that demonstrates how the panels would lay out on the roof

Solar has been removed from proposal

Service Turnout Submit a turning template diagram to show how vehicles which are denied access at entry gate would successfully and safely use the service turnout

Revised entrance to show turnout availability while parked in front of the gate

Colors Submit a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Submitted a revised colors amp materials board with physical materials and colors for the home

Landscaping Reduce planting plan and include more low

water use and California Native plants in plan Some proposed plants are too close to the

existing Oaks revise the plan to space out the shrubs and trees

Irrigation should be kept to 10-ft from existing oaks and the base of the trunk should be kept clear of mulch

Reduced planting plan to decrease density of plants and includes more low water use plants

Includes WELO calculation

Lighting Revise exterior lighting plan to reduce the amount of proposed lighting Keep the exterior lighting to a minimal amount and only for safety purposes

Reduced quantity of exterior lighting from 42 path lights to 24 path lights and located in areas for safety purposes

Fencing Keep the natural wood color of the proposed fencing at the entrance gate and around the perimeter

Color of fencing is proposed to be a stained redwood

Rear Yard Pavement Reduce or eliminate rear yards impervious surface by adding permeable pavers

Total impervious surface outside of building footprint has been reduced from 2097 sq ft to 983 sq ft

Staffs Analysis and Comments General Plan and Zoning The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Single-Family Residential that allows up to two dwelling units per acre The development proposal is consistent with the underlying land use designation as single family residence which is a permitted use The zoning for the subject property is R-40 (Single-Family Residential- minimum lot size ndash 40000 sq ft) The existing parcel is approximately 43000 sq ft The development standards are outlined in the table below

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 3 of 6

R-40 Development Standards Proposal

Maximum Height max 35rsquo 24rsquo-10rdquo

Side yard setback min 20rsquo aggregate 40rsquo 20rsquo-3rdquo amp 32rsquo-9rdquo53rsquo aggregate

Front yard setback min 25rsquo 85rsquo-15rdquo

Rear yard setback min 15rsquo 59rsquo

Parking min two spaces (10rsquo x 20rsquo) two spaces

Building Articulation The applicant revised the rear (east) elevation to provide a dormer to break up massing and articulate the roof As shown in the figures below the October elevation shows an expansive roofline increasing the massing at rear elevation The November elevation has been modified to include a dormer in between the two chimneys The figures below demonstrate the previous proposal and the modification to the the rear elevation Staff finds that the applicant considered the commisions recommendation to add a dormer to break up roof massing and the proposed dormer would provide building articulation to increase the visual appearance when viewed from the adjacent neighbors at the rear yard This revision increases consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines specifically Section II(B)(2)(a) as follows

RDG II(B)(2)(a) Building forms on infill sites shall not contrast sharply with the existing visual environment Attention should be given to predominant roof slopes and roof design amount of faccedilade articulation orientation of entries and garages etc

Rear Elevation-October

Rear Elevation-November

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 4 of 6

Rear Elevation Rendering-November

Circulation amp Parking The applicant revised the proposed driveway configuration which includes removing the circular driveway reducing driveway proposed near the garage entrance and provides a diagram showing sufficient turnaround space at the entry gate As shown in the figure below portions of the driveway that were of concern have been reduced and the circular driveway has been modified In addition the applicant submitted the plans to Contra Costa County Fire Department for review and approval prior to the Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 The Fire Department reviewed and approved the proposed driveway configuration and copies of the stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Staff finds that the reduction of driveway would provide a safe and supportive use for the proposed residence and increases the conformance of Section II(A)(2)(h) of the Residential Design Guideline which requires the following

RDG II(A)(2)(h) Adequate parking and safe automobile ingress and egress should be provided

The revision to the driveway configuration provides a clear and safe path of travel for visitors and emergency vehicles Staff finds that these revisions increase consistency with the Residential Design Guidelines and that the applicant revised according to the Design Review Commissionrsquos Comments

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 5 of 6

Colors amp Materials The colors and materials are applied on all elevations and include the following

Siding James Hardie lap siding and shingles ndash Artichoke green color known as Grenedier Pond

Roof Charcoal color Asphalt Comp Shingle

Windows Marvin Aluminum clad wood

Trim White Heron

Shutters Dark green color known as Dakota Shadow

Entry Door Brick Red The proposed colors and materials have not been modified from the previous proposal but the applicant has included a colors and materials board with physical materials as requested by the Commission on October 9th Staff finds that the proposed colors are similar to the ones within the surrounding environment and compatible to the existing homes in the neighborhood The proposed green shades blend with the existing and proposed trees on-site The colors and materials meet the Residential Design Guideline that encourages colors to be similar with the surrounding environment and blend with the environmental back drop

Landscaping amp Outdoor Living Spaces The applicant has revised the landscape plan to reduce the amount of vegetation and include low water use plants As shown in the landscape plan the applicant has included a Preliminary Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Worksheet on sheet L-41 to present the estimated total water use and the maximum water allowance The estimated total water use is approximately 28768 gallons per year which shall be regulated by East Bay Municipal Utility District The irrigation plan includes a hydrozone chart that shows the plants to be grouped according to their water needs and then organized by irrigation zones and will be included in the irrigation schedules to match the plant groupings The applicant has prepared a landscape reduction calculation and is included in Attachment 4 The lighting plan has been revised to reduce the amount of proposed path lights throughout the site The quantity was reduced from 42 path lights to 24 path lights that are located in areas that will provide sufficient lighting for safety purposes The proposed fence color will be stained a heart redwood to keep the natural wood color of the fencing material The total impervious surface has been reduced to 8865 square feet approximately 1114 less than the first proposal The reduction of impervious surface occurs primarily around the pool and spa area which now permeable paving is proposed

Drainage amp Grading The proposed project involves construction of a new single-story single family residence with outdoor living areas and driveway access that was revised to reduce permeable surfaces and grading The proposed grading required for the project is 482 CY of cut and fill The applicant would not be required to obtain a grading permit for the proposed grading The applicant provides the Landscape cut and fill calculation table on Sheet 60 Conceptual Drainage Plan of the plan set demonstrating the cut and fill associated with the project The proposed project will be required to address any comments provided by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit

CEQA The project has been evaluated in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (ldquoCEQArdquo) and determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as the proposed project would result in the development of a single-family residence in a residentially zoned property

Design Review Commission DR12-18 Pease Staff Report November 26 2018

Page 6 of 6

Public Notice A notice was mailed and posted for the original hearing date of October 9 2018 The application was continued to a date certain therefore no further public noticing was required for this project Staff did not receive public comment

Agency Response The project plan set submitted for Design Review Commission meeting on October 9 2018 was referred to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (ldquoCCCSDrdquo) City Engineer Contra Costa County Planning Department Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department (ldquoCCCBIDrdquo) and Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ldquoCCCFPDrdquo) The project plan set submitted in preparation for Design Review Commission meeting on November 26 2018 was not routed to the referral agencies due to very minimal changes in scope of work The four comments received from the previous plan set would still apply to this project and are attached to this report as Attachment 4 In addition the applicant submitted the proposed driveway configuration to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and approval The approved stamped plans are included in Attachment 4 Recommendations made by the CCCFPD CCCSD Cityrsquos consulting arborist and City Engineer have been included as project specific conditions of approval which are shaded in grey and included as an attachment CCCBID had no comments at this time The comments made by the agencies would not prevent the development and would not materially change the site layout or design of the structure as proposed

Final Action The Design Review Commission is the hearing authority for the subject application Decisions of the Design Review Commission can be appealed to the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 6-280 of the Lafayette Municipal code within 14-calendar days of the action

Findings The approval of this application requires the Design Review Commission to make findings for Design Review structures over 17rsquo in height and permit category II tree removal The detailed findings are included in Resolution 2018-22 as Attachment 1

Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission review the revisions to the project conduct the public hearing and adopt Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 approving the requested Design Review Permit subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ldquoArdquo

Attachments 1 Design Review Commission Resolution 2018-22 2 ldquoExhibit Ardquo - Conditions of Approval 3 Maps and Aerial Images 4 Referral Agency Comments

a Contra Costa County Fire Department Approval 5 Landscape Reduction Calculations 6 DRC Meeting Minutes for October 9 2018 7 DR12-18 Project Plans 20180918 (85rdquo x 11rdquo) 8 DR12-18 Project Plans 20181115 (11rdquo x 17rdquo)

Inside Out Design Inc 6000 Harwood Avenue Oakland CA 94618 51065576674 T 5106557673 F aboutinsideoutcom

September 25 2018 Ms Brianne Reyes Assistant Contract Planner City of Lafayette 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd Suite 210 Lafayette California 94549 Re Landscape Review DR12-18 Leslie amp Matthew Pease (Owners) R-40 Zoning Account 2734 Dear Brianne

We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road

Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service

A site visit was made on September 21 2018 Story poles were erected at the time of the site visit

Site Summery

The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (mostly located along the perimeter of the lot) The property is bordered by an adjacent neighborrsquos driveway to the north Happy Valley Glen Road (a small access lane connecting Happy Valley Road and Glenn Road) to the south and an existing residence to the east

Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following

bull Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

bull Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road

bull Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road

bull Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road

Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions

2

Existing Trees and Mitigations

All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines

1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (except in special circumstances) The proposed mitigation trees toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) dogwood (Cornus lsquoEddiersquos wonderrsquo) and Pacific wax myrtle (Myrica californica) are significantly smaller in stature and would not provide the level of habitat of the existing trees deemed for removal

To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residences south of the site at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road

As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree

Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan

The Landscape Plan utilizes appropriate plantings for the semi-rural site with thought given to providing screening for the adjacent residences and privacy for the homeowner

2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road

Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan

3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations

Please contact us if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely INSIDEOUT DESIGN INC

Pennell Phillips City Landscape Consultant Landscape Architect CLA 5602 Certified Arborist WE-6608A

From Leach TedTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Tuesday September 25 2018 92243 AMAttachments image001png

The home will require fire sprinklers Regards Ted Leach - Fire InspectorContra Costa CountyFire Protection District4005 Port Chicago Highway Suite 250Concord CA 94520(925) 941-3300 x 1539

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andor confidential information only for use by

the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose

or distribute this message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject to civil action andor

criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received this transmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or

by telephone and delete the transmission Thank you

From Reyes Brianne ltbreyescilafayettecausgt Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire ltfirecccfpdorggt Luttropp Matt ltMLuttroppcilafayettecausgt PennltpennaboutinsideoutcomgtSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg

How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged andorconfidential information only for use by the intended recipients Unless you are the addressee (orauthorized to receive messages for the addressee) you may not use copy disclose or distributethis message (or any information contained in or attached to it) to anyone You may be subject tocivil action andor criminal penalties for violation of this restriction If you received thistransmission in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone and delete thetransmission Thank you

From Russ LeavittTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project Review 3654A Happy Valley Road LafayetteDate Monday September 24 2018 50326 PMAttachments RUSSELL B LEAVITTvcf

According to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) records the project

site is within Central Sanrsquos service area Sanitary sewer service is available to the

west side of the project site via an ten-inch diameter public main sewer on Happy

Valley Road The proposed residence would not be expected to produce an

unmanageable added capacity demand on the wastewater system nor interfere with

existing facilities The applicant must submit full-size improvement plans for Central

San Permit staff to review and pay all appropriate fees For sewer connection and

fee information the applicant should contact the Central San Permit Section at (925)

229-7371 Thanks

From Reyes Brianne [mailtobreyescilafayettecaus] Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 143 PMTo _Referral lt_ReferralcilafayettecausgtSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract Planner

BEGINVCARD13VERSION2113X-MS-SIGNATUREYES13NLEAVITTRUSSELLB13FNRUSSELL B LEAVITT13ORGEngineering Assistant IIIRLEAVITTcentralsanorg13TITLEv (925) 229-7255 f (925) 228-462413X-MS-OL-DEFAULT-POSTAL-ADDRESS213X-MS-CARDPICTURETYPE=PNGENCODING=BASE6413 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAOgAAAA3CAYAAAAGwQaCAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B13 AACxjwv8YQUAAAAJcEhZcwAAEnQAABJ0Ad5mH3gAAEg3SURBVHhe7V0FWFbZ1mbspLs7VewA13 W7HF7sbWMVFsEUxExMTEwhbFwETFxO7C7vx07NZ53dtPhiMmXHuf+8d7zyu51nPd84+++yz13 Y70r9t7nfDo6Af9oB0XdKvv5a4vr166RkZH+jRs39i9durTilgEtVeuXOl8+bN4tqs13 P+gHaDBr0CbI+dOBbUvGnzoBHDR5wPHxOGwMBAdO7cGW0C2qBt27bo1LEzQoKHYciQIed+13 vnnoJDhI4Pu3r0fBCCHtpgf9IN+0LeQgObjx4RqczzNpLnxCt5eDYuLXRxYsX3dC+Q3uC13 Lxhz5sxF7PIV2Lp1Gw4fOYJTp04pPrDINatWYsAArZe3bpo1bI1OnTsiB49eix68+bNAG2R13 3z3t27fPfubMmdH29vbRPI3O8lPG6B07doxOufrX6PHpm+3nzoyOnjhxYlZt0jdR9IKl3l0713 d4020tePtjG3ivb09MylvZRG06ZNG+1oaq7qqOVikv6v0JMnT6rExsZGb9+5Jr48eM5tcn13 EiUlJWVfGbcy2t3TPa1uERETRMZ+Uhm+kU6fPl00Pj4++sCBA9G3b9+21Sb8+nV+zdTQk8t13 3e+78Wf4rmyAUhs6o8PBqLNnn9zYQ7Au1GbT2bgtcXDTps2fV6tQFrNmzsHhw4dx+84dvH13 nn39dXr69CnCwsII0gAsX7YM7Fx07doVFStWfLZq1ao9BHxTbfHfJRUvXjx7sWLFjjs7OyNr13 1qxgEqXqJ0TPmHExJce3U2adzK08HFwfuLAsMzOzvyT0zZu3rlmsWAlkypQJtWvVlj400l4S13 pflzrVq19lCBvM6WOYuqo3DksLDzv9566qoyQUaP2mab+uAtlfd3d0RHT0HmzZtMtRe+pfI13 399nZSVPUf2tLpFRUWJeHwzQOvXrOlcsUz5ZComUG7w9u3bAtpL0yiNsry6M3TwKVXd2nc13 Yxu9yzG3DHQWViBXhs6iqsg6vzwMpvmg5eGJH04+uKuZPWmWJl++fG+o+aHRPMC7dymgJIDx13 +vVrPLLL3jw4AGuXL6sgLv0BFcuHARV65cQeiwYejUviN2bk9U9zx8Ry7knajXJkyCArq13 2JNMYGpIzaqn1XVLtmvZMCimzZsr0ZMWKkhtagGYUracLICWZtOnap71OynIbXNbXrNtRs13 2JBQZOevZqQkSM1k6ZEaQb0H6hxt3HQDB8+PEmj0TTr3bv3SxaJUqVKYd2yTUVP7Tqm6T9g13 oCZ2ZZxm3rx5Gn19au8nqlqVf827u5eGh5rChcorvH29D48fvz4ZlRqSrgXLFiAs2fPKoAm13 JiZmc3FyisqeLRsyZMiA0r4V9jKt+bFjxzSH9umWOyt1VAJ1WWjY2NJmrMJM2lWerx8bH13 202ZHKUZOGiIJnJSlKZS5SqaEiVKaUaOHGniYO3QLHvWbOpZAobjx88UmzltjiZiETN5q0713 NX6VKmkiJ065M2nSJN+ff+6qyZ41q8bEyEhT0rekpmbNGselXkIc6lwd23WJ19PT+8j+Q5cO13 Hd6cOXNmYFjYxCWz5i0q2iIgoHCrNm01ObLn0BjpGmoGsS+WLFlifToUZ+5c+dqnJycVL0b13 1Gty29jYuIyMg7GRMVbQW3v8+HEBKqm8Hdt11GT8KYPGwc5OU8DbW0Pv7ErK0+Hae7VxGzL13 b+wO7HV4OnItrAKdBWUJSv8veU0D6KzwgW55XTRt3BxnzpxVABOiBsPFixexLn4DevbqDWtr13 W2TMmBEG+ga0DuYwMTGFvp6e0vjyW8rXF1sTErR3p9CNm7d4byCaNGmCpk2bNtJW77uhFSvW13 eGXKlPn+Tz9hCyZMsVokxU1aNyyoZW5FXjtVpbMWe5lzJARBCfs7OyUYOfOnRu5c+WW68iT13 Jw9WrFiRZj0y0wLHxCxB9ersY22acJEiRV56uHq0pcDJ+XVd3ZwPpU8JrFfbtm496+7spvIR13 gOKZKICuW7eufe3atVW6nbXdO0lLJbrmi9zc1D1vjIyMTjs6Oqp8sStXYVPCNnWcgfXW09VL13 8w5Cho9Ao+Yt1bGwC+9JPncu7Vw4V65cuHTpEho3bgwCB74cWxMTE3WtUvlK1mr6OHDh1El13 qYx4iEIFCz6X8Cjlio7OuHHjCuTIkfNXXcqGnb39rcyZUqZoHk7e3dlVng4OAg5Z8pUaLE13 6zx586Q9v2TJMhgzJryNnbX1G54Njc3vyL1kGsdO3Z6wtXSIuajfdPzbIb0sP6MwtDZ0Y13 P2RYUgM68fWhs7URdBIaQmdtXehsJDjXVoJeeT2MHBKKB3fvp6CKROuL8eMiUJqdnz17duTx13 8FKD1aVzZ0wYH4l5c2Mwa9YcRIwdi3Zt28LGyhwuLs5ISNiiLeE3EqBPnjRJrOnHatWq1dVW13 87ugCeMmJ9CqIWfOnChapMgnAC3nV+V9DlqZO4em7zcPHdmzZIVBEssgaAExcvL60CJYsVv13 ZMmSBVZWVrMnj17m4GBvrpmrJNpzYmth5Z6eHqp80KFCoHu6cZr16699PBwFcXZcuWHVSw13 oHds9uzZqPysL+jrZKyZXSeDWHLExcXFs+tUDFquXLn2Nja2qpzAwMBPAMqxWSRWNUvmTDce13 PnziN2ZMmMrXf8BQbNuaqI49WYexo8JQqEAhdb527VqZ1FPHAu5u3bqtWxeUYAAXQLZ2Njk13 ABVJ9Jzo6GcZmFbBt8yV06dOHylfrpy65+L5a+P5q2jaJgoNw9PpbhLFC1xQJusqH79+mcF13 kF558l4dPR0fX19gzmizGv5+yuFzSxo1KgRBg8eFnnv3p4nVImnd+b4wJG5M4cOCAh1my13 ZgH7e1PYuPE9Svj4quv0LCTGf7ouvHIYEn54T57x4R1ulwVNi2B6fDdj+5bqC9rOjVh1fN13 Is6tfuAS2xg6s9mgVdS825oiw3aCcVV5phWEzqTiKWBNqIWfKuTExOHj8OHF2xQ0kWJjYyV+13 RAZaAQMDA7Rq1Rrbt2zD8+fPtTk+pV8ePULzxg3gxhhk27ZtKu3DhwUwJfVcSrFzJuHAvm813 H9IdbKGt7t9OzRo3S8iRIwdM6Q107NglDaCnky3puBFDfQ1c4RhvQaZNa6TJky7rwMATWF13 O9DCwiJehM7S0vIUY9j6xsYp4CUXOnLkyAQR3Jw5cqJLx45xd+7csVu5cuUtuU7LceTcuXPD13 CNzzcj506NBfIiIiVspxHi8vVK1a1ZfHiiyMTdvnZB15iGnTpqUBdMP27RXcvfKc4SHKlS5713 YGyZX6t2wSofPPnxdACjVXHBNuRjRsTthUsmAJQWr1wWjd13L1HTyqDeJ9GTZo+knOCc3+z13 Zq2LPr21zaODg6Pc2bPgZL5iy5zd3QdqktvQfKQ02boBwaHRNnTCoqSat6q9ScAJZ0lS4113 GxMSy+bL531SzhvWrfe8Zs2a00Upyrmtrb14DLODevdV5zVq1UhgWBVKpXdPrG+fv035c6Z13 u0dmxt652Q+0pBbM93Qy3dvenQ+NG1N5a3B75yX14f54hqwX1YXPhu7wG5duy0TktesoWsR13 +OrD2yb9k8beNp5Pq7moEnR20I1ZT4D29IRORWsYlbJEk6a1UbuGH3J3dIFODRMEd+6Ht89e13 KQCJpROrKS6cMQVQLGfHjh1x9+5ddV1AR82OEaEj0K9fP8VR06apeLRu3boUWHc1yyv07Nkz13 1KhRQ9wZdS7EOmLO7NmoVavWnYMHDzbXNu9vpcHDQhJ0dXUh1tHOzjENoPfP3TyVKWMmGOjp13 g9Yzjkn+Gzdu9L9w4YIcw8fHR9zd03TN7okF69Klyymm15dr4rYVJBquXr36Qp3b28ORg1x13 6XSqVKmiAFqpUqWbmzZtOs+YXwkly0VkZKQ6btasmfRbGkCLeOdtb2aS4t41atwoDaAr4lYO13 KV2aY8309fHbbrBMP627K2MzuGB+bwU68gITE7ORqS5ujUo13IsXpZLm8YSJk3DiMfYwPD13 1LwzyDrnTp1bT6sugMXEqdNvd+7c+dxPvC5to1JKA+io8PAoJydnFRvb2tp+AdCsBG4edc113 jDeDUi1k7KqV96jQjFjHqZUrV1Zpu3bugm9RHwV0Az29EIZWi2WySNzqdfHr77dv3176F2LF13 2TfD0BHnI7t4Ld90BP9mMr4aWFVuqtsUAzdVeGFNZFpsR9MF1VB4U2dn664sefh9rtHUX5H13 fy0l8DsYIZcjiZoUacx9qzcjkunLuDh1fuYvmgKMnpkRMNKtXHn4k0FnndvPyAyYiJdHF1x13 12BuagrvAgVw5tx5dV2ods0aytJIfCLgFRZLYk9A21lawvUzgPr4lGBsZU2LvEKlCT199hxD13 Q4bLYI7UNvFvpXHjptpQuO7yUATlKTlZuGdA50pmuQ0CEj1c+V6lD1r1mS6l8l9+vT5IHlb13 t26Nvfv20x0roNy7VatWpQFUgFC0iO81+ogf5bxgkWLoN2iYAmj7rt0VQKWfKaQqfpfz6OgZ13 VX2KFVXHvYOCsHn7rjSA0itp37ABPSBey5Y9268sP5l9n0zLGEIrtE7SnZ1c3ufPX+SGlEdh13 FqV6w8LcL14B4z3FjCP9DcVURYBgTvjQVUeYzvs25h0XV9PX7WLrAB6fr19Rwjti0TLFjP13 1PivTq166NChQxpAJ0yYYMby9vNQrr8mq6jp5DMePhtBrq4BPVzKpIHIi8VKlTAybNn30se13 PT29uyIcirXFXAKS5xjmzZHq6OWWU9VZ9K4oiNazgszF+PiH6AP3jyttvTaLtiuYLyo13 LGIVMkH3e7yA1xeWRrVTw7H34lGU8S2Fn1u1xdOr9xQw3tA63rp1m5pqN0oxACgngeH9x1Q13 1969e0fLNgfZs2aHpZkFPNzdlJC1pRCm0sCgfgqQtpbWcLN1gKujcxpbMZ4SIKYH6Au6w9X813 qkAmVixMzRC3apWywELHjx9DQJvWGDBggGxoyKZt8t9GL1682OHi5CwCc0csEMFzm8kudD9t13 nZyckg0NDR+IMO3cuTOZgqYEsF27dsmLFi1KpjJLphAl74vbsa5gvoKVzUzN1HWChVVHjmu13 Wq168vLV65rxWIcWM6eVuXkyBTO5VatWyTxXefLmzesoz5Lj0aNGJdOCFJT8qURr3U+eTWVy13 XupIcD5r2rRp920JCeO8PD2TXV1dP9rZ2r6oU6du8vot25pOmThxHuucbGNjk7xmcWxy7Zd13 VdlFC+RPpoA7du3aNa1d4eHhyQa6+qpO1atXD0l5osTn4xL4k0zLl9yhfYfk7NmyJdNTSA4O13 Dv5kzOiOzq9WrZoojWtSN4LpAZP9mL7e1NQ8OXfu3LdoCRVqVMnecSIEfmnTJlxgIrlOpXD13 Y2cnj2SctVKN2gQnKVatdrJ0veMzx9SsVQnaFdJ3+bPXyC5Vbv2qv6UmeRly5aZqAfXfT613 esK0y9tRE6Z2JnPuFHNuH4FlKm8uA50YuuRqyBLJ1OUr1Qae+JSljtevnqJAv3YKUaaha13 pQZqVK+OfB55EBocCgqmypOUtA+MN2BiZKx+3dnJAsa+ffuq60JNGzZE5kyZ4ebiqvKkZydH13 xy8AKvFqxYqVYWRgqKxx8eLFkXz+N2s8ZcoUWuzxOHr0aBFts92ogtehkIl4YKPNkkRq1ub13 aX7a07+VWJeM2joGaZMUMW0ZOQ1c30Isow7Lq6g9X8Ty3PR1k08iTTieVFyK+2pIp7nIXfR13 nqYR61OS6U20p98f3XvzuE746SUPMsQwhlzgRwD+CTiFGYqLK2O3I3t0bp5Q9y7cJPxHnD513 ylWEhITAt0QJlPEpxbhkAKZFTYNzZrYsH4D+yIlLqxftx5yZssBJxs7BThZZM+ZLRsaEpRv13 3rxR+WQ7nwT1zgTjtwH0Bfz8qsKYrgmtE61zVgTRdUslmSVu2awFCucvN0A9H+Bbty+3VZ713 +N3Q1Rs3Gt+f+LXU9hSgSHcittaffJ51+fK1+730Tr+de+BfAuZi8qQayB1ihY5uWuH0113 JabcnpiIqlWro1D+QujTtx9mz5jNWHAVhg8LQUDz1nh096HKd+zYCfH5YWpsAieH38BnzbiD13 bhfd0eMq3+XLl+Fg4wBDA4MvQPp7FrR8BT81+5nfMw8s6AZLvCObHYTE3e3+czfMmTNnzdWr13 V92NcQWymwcUrV6LrNGwSTY8kmgouukuPPlO1l8y6WfX7+HvX+uJlYWNspSat7XTEpM13 il64cKGdyvBvpsTExExxcXHRLVu2jO4V2D+6CdvRoV3n6H379o3VZhFq7lelyh0P7852vMv13 6Njp8mTDhyNTkjcXVKb9AlxHvS5X5G9nR0uVLO2qTv6A7d+60SDpwODoh4bCeNumR2ee13 Xq3WY+EW3oy+xpTleCr9SUYU1nc2S2MTbeRtzaATqg7qtSthLuXbzOgBOJXr0L+PnRtm0713 zJ41FzGLlmHh4sVqtpWdgGFDhwEfFU7Qq3t3NXPmZP8b4BToeC7rcbJelkqzWFaWzJnhZGkL13 53RgjOAerq6qTVSiWu1278UzZs7DwP79BNXOre2G5RdOPGjV2ymlE5SeznDLhYW5h9Ux713 +S9Tpp8yxcskSomiJU4yPivnX83er48+eDu7v5JvPrvIsaaWQICOsCUIYqllTVM2A5zM3Mw13 5n2jmzXreA5hgyZNmqgJtjJlysgE2xdEGbIxMTU9m9+7AArkKdBGmwJUflvYKxMGbLF3AWL13 lmqTPyG8tUb+JTwuZsvn7e09783ScRGnTw4fmKAw7PfJ5tQTkCsNqXgBRewjhzBYG5swV013 1tVDhhmFkHFKSfwUVxNevp64uPOU2pK3JWE7LV8+DB8xAmvXrMX8uXOxNn4DtmzfiTXxG1G713 Tm21UC0kVszTwwO5suaAi6PTpwAlW5lZsKw8am1TXGGJWWvSPZZdKc5Ov+XM4C6M251c3NV13 AC1XqpS6LnT+4hWUK1sRRkZu0iAVihfRS2zlC0ju2JGBgUGBq6LjY29SmHONGvegjat2wRo13 LE3NNHXq1NF0+7mnJj4+fjmtYVDkpEmavUlJmqlTp2qaN2+miYiIGB8eHp5zxYoVW2SG9tKV13 y2eMjY0DZMbWKLchXG0dy8s2ynHjIv07d+6iMTUy1VSpVEXTqFEjzerVqxOXLVsWEBMTozl513 8qRm9959mmpVamkGDhyoqV+viY0dKRm3rxFRXft3HWxZfM2mlq16kWk1F5Hh2VmkT3BPISX13 lycmTZn6zNnFVWZgBSTvFi1aNG3hkiWL27btJMr2c2bN8stXrxYkydPHo2enp7myJEjGlrg13 XyR4cKFxTB0u3PsasLSFSs1Q4cO3RAWHtalR89Aze5de95OnDwdoaGhePX8VRwVg3GfPn3m13 FSlSRJPHwV0zbdo01jP0hSg5S0sLlCxZ0lPq918hzfPHFaacX0OrKVvxfgecq+oranTwhow13 aG4Kz2puqN2yBkqULI7sHtkwdkCIEvhTp89Sk5XF8OHDsWVrIlavXoP18fFYsXw5j1djXfwm13 VC5fFufOX1D5T585q7SWmb7JFwAVdrCzg4GuLpq1aKU2zAtd4L2ebp4KeLJFTID8LQCV8mS213 14MKQWaNFb38FT5FS4gACMBSpdWATSvpwfq1akZsWvNdt8bSTeyt2rTrq2jg7MsNSGft7dS13 XAYGBqoXZxN3YubPVv2tCUYBweHNbNmzVoifSdWOCR4pJqJl2vCZcqWwdixY5u6unrKGqWs13 war5ApnoWxgTg7p1qdiZLxfPM1LI83rTuwpor9KKFi0qu3l86Bk9kq2LBIVaZhHy9PTMYmdp13 rfL16NkDjH+b0MU+InWQtfLwceNkQ4W6Hj1rFqhQ1DIJ+ZqXl9fDPn2D1LlcF2Y4o3YQyf3C13 4qF5ubujdMmy7INs9NocX9w5fS25U4eOKr+1lRU9wQIoVLAQDA0N08pp1qzZf2+r37Jru+5l13 iGG8Of8rMedSWs217NxVVZHhZ3tUr+qHyOFhOLXtEJ4eKzW4oyszfD+l1e0bi8xaMBANKrf13 ADt2JKrdQOvWrcE6WsstCQk4fuI4Vq1Zj7o1KynwCG3YuEVtOXOg+K1yR+xknYEsLi1Y8eG13 4XrN8rqxsevhyOvmZuYwsXZ6ZsB6ubsAifed3aNZVHqGqVamAM8n1PDvyLFBQU9EJ2YEQ13 2RhGDOzZHyODR7r7Va6qQNmzZ8DM2fMuqrd43qheHHfmvb29iqvbV9PAGptt8RBMkU7lNy13 jYL9ccOfauKajca0Bqjd+eq7t16Y+c8ZMaN64yRla2rPSzwTAu3796JQzdY8sqabYtG13 LTA1el7sypUrVZrI0KFDh0Yx7wuC9S7jvJZMV3SbgMyUsmcYtGjyokQTAvOIgK4AQTMZqGa13 nZfrSXv3xubKmUu58gT6ykvnzx+5cv3Wylza3ULkk9Ektkntx5V1TVpw0LLv9HxuSn35c2T13 78bAfv2m586eAyYmxujLdh09cTZ65fJVmxgaqHJEIXTo0OGs9Vv5LnlHR1XNHzxu0spawjO13 5eVhVNMafbr1wrWD59TbJBLH0Q1Q+2PrNmqgBP3okaOoWb0m5i9YiE2btxAoW7FlSwISE3di13 9969SD6XjLjVa1G7RnWVX2h17Co1OWRPTfU5ONOzhbk5HGhhNxCYQjJDOz5ygtrQ4GBtB2cb13 B9iYWwpQGX5RjTvseMnVB6herXr4sGjx7J44+j61ev97Kztpkpr7HxVFmN1SvXzZZj2Vzf13 v3Qab6+rGZmE5rekFfX7+mWJVsWTIjV7ZsvrzvoeQlz8zv6Byhm0MJ+7uuXXvlrVq1piqT13 bqaEHxKDvrC0sESbps0nMWacKvMK5ubmz3R1dYvIZgXJ27hZswXPbjwLevP0jVvs8liVFhTU13 F7LtTxT1PnzdzItjY6fOXOZP2qOglYrgcx4PkRSXNydj7fb8CANakbCDiu7uUrVFLHYv3r13 16sn7wR7EKyyqYIWsCwV69eNaA3cDtTpszw86t8+cKFC0GvX78OobW9LH0zasQozJgxQ5XR13 OqAtJkZFqdfNKlauXtmNsi7pkyZNmkGx+XNGH8TJWpOdfbb2PthprS3TD4D5wpaz3jGZw0t13 MWbIMDx78ATx6zejfPny8HBzwc9duqBcufIc8FUq9qTvj6bNWuDI0RME5lbZ1A3GALh8+SoO13 HzmGAsPYNbMmahXvVIKMkirV8aprVRBlBhA10DFKBrdO9eysYHURQd2raFoa4+8ji7sQyb13 bwboiRMnVR6hZg0b4c69B9IgAoNGDDAxNnBeUaqJV3OcEN+f39pSP0gLKpgj0Cux3gb8113 5bhwkWJo2LCp7CR6mCNnDnTv0f1am2bNLkkZVuYW7wjAvLKpXaxy+7ZtI65fvx5NEH3IT3f513 0P79l+vWrSuvY6FFixYyISXLWGqcGTeqFxVwH7m6dOgyQg6LFCmsdjTRnX1CAKbtXhKaOGmS13 Aqi8IUOrFdK1a+eBPwTAWyxAoU30+p1F2vo4Ogge7dtBw4MqUWgT5D923JfUlLSNrkuipyu13 bdjOnbvneHnlUW8BRU6avEOecfz40fHypoyAWNbrGRure8Vjo4JQAKWCqSzPNMiVG1ZGZuUk13 7T9Kd1790qrj7tGPs8aI5aQmBycwmsI0K526NKjE148fY4lS5bQrXSGvHY0adJE7Ni9hxaz13 uno3U9zbiIgIjB4egu079uA4LdSD+fp6u5Q923ctEkB69z5i2jRuJkWGkA83V8zU9NvAqi913 rZ3qRNlzm0oPNRrkpWbLnSuXcofDKCurL8M9sULKTGwUF2258mTJ9EgMrGd7X7hXyPjDZt13 O+ISx0uORUhdXFzUr5wzxn8bEhKitgH26dtXNrRfp0X9IK6qjCPdWJWvlr+7MXNK8eyjY4x13 550z+0+9lg35Yn2ln1O3z63fvOVjXFzcNTkWEAQGBqZk0gpA4lzBUQbErbcT0n+jeiOKoCK13 O854Vnb3PBVLxx3ZkTNaBwQECD3KG+ufDIS7ITqXAB7ztSZv783vLWiSpb5KZTp06PJkyY13 9MTczELFkv27VMALV261HhDQwP1DNkLPmePFV3mTnOmzfv1bCwsG08ryxp4mnkz5RsmS13 Jf8zO4koj5mvvbjXruR2dCZR8sZU3r4FxeBxmmlUeD+jXx8u4TuqarlUskG5vXrYvHpi1b13 GEGo0ypUrh544YCYx8O4CwG6tSm2Lx5qj2OHbsGJ4eyYvvqp3++YvmIytLpyLnTixAm113 z9HSzPyrk0Sfs2z6FoHq3r27AqDQkeMnVTyhp6v7pwA1NzETLQ66OiqPDEilihXkncJJG+13 vsFKCuoluq7yAndy48aNk6dPn15CtvrZWNko4Jau6Jfs7umljoX8PzUsWz1698OJlCm+zt13 7a32taZuMezQqdvpIvnyuTrY2Caz32S29A7TPZ2cHIJ9SLFfJMLFCum8u5ITEyuWqW6Opbn13 s5y03VC0aDVlrysPUb50WYkHPmiwt2jl2ek1jM9N6rXOJl5sxMkvnRXVdripUuTmzVsekG213 +dEaP6XiSWasqLb6EaBqq1lypUf1a1XV7ZTJhsbGydfvXpV9gcL9SdLOfKmiw7d7GqyJZBW13 96mU17dv30QLE4uSujl1k2mdH+fMmfMGs1nAHr39eOAkFOLoSaFFtBf721zr0NYNLYHCvC13 p+PO3Xto1KSpmoLevDURq1atYYy5Gdu3b6c2rQkG8rhz+w56dOuhAHrw4EFcvXIF165dwnz13 57Fz5075nAU4rinuc+BaIzdu5MUQJ48f6YAI7HNtwBUWAAtPJPucuouo8GDByEztWb6t1k+13 B6gr47AcWbKhRIkS6rrQA1rg8j7F5EAFaLLaPRXt99FWL5jciltaffTIwNemyjlCTjFSu13 sdMX7rp+v+9E0i+dyXbHpok9KIaV9s9fszYv5AKYlZtEmSVpnsngP37ig1oPPDnWg13 ErcuYxps6rAamwtFCvojbcPn2PZsmVo0bIltifuxBqxnps2I2nffgVExoE6K3b6nWw3j3713 YAGtpljQs2fOqO8CyUe97t27j1NnzmLP3r1MO8jgvQHmzJor+FBUs2YNNQngavlLO7X2N7O13 Xn1RwdfHN22X0c2bN1CkQH6C0Albt2xWaZ8DNHUddFjoCHVdKIEKp0njJhKPSMB+r0SrZ9613 y8bC0go1GttpKv6H9mJ9D9DRH3HfsfnP8os+2uFPwfnEvLCGjAcUgq1ejRF79bd0apuY7Wk13 MS48HOHh43Dg4BEk7tyl4pG9Sftw+cp1NGrYCLdu3VLb54KHhWBqVBTu3Lmj4s39DLgl7bE13 7QRnEg4dPkyLegGjw8ahb2AQIJ8bIs+dE62sn721zVcB+TW2trSATJ+HjQnHy5ev8Ob1a4wf13 F8441QYb1suHAD4FaF53D1jRjZblmqvXbqjrQqEhwzF37jzs2bPnB0Di8S4TtzigKIlfAN613 9w+yx8c+0cRwRkQeHSWJtcieZfzM7d2az3orKmGzGN8UKBVNQS26IYNi+Iwashw9O7VC0+e13 PkNIyAgsj11BgO7H4eMncOL0GVy5ehVPnjxFvVq1lesqsdysGTMIvEARdgXM07SeYlnv3LmN13 S1eu0tXdhTVr1mDypAlo1bg+Y9Krarvf418eI2fOXNCX3UHf6OY6OabsyfXx9VUWW0h2J8le13 W3mhWygVoPI2S36vvNDPras+n5JKEoe2oWfQt3fvdjz9Lj8m9k+lx48f0e2Bv5PUXBiYqZt13 94+37Lgv4mXWBeVA2fq5oOE+sgyuRTcAyqgX82umDlmKlatXI3d+w4ibHgY47rB0DBGGzJk13 qBJ+2ax+4+ZNWdTH8ROncPBQV2SHS0fHoU2LRhEzq064yz586ruPTgkePYkLBNZvKwJWEL13 rhw5hwePNLhw4TyaNW6KKROnqO17wiGho5E7e044Wqe8zZLKNow19WkprSws1F5aVwJYNiXI13 sbzAKzN6J0+mLJmsX78eJoxnVi5PeTlb1korV6qupvetrawhX6Q7ePSwuia0fm28UiiTZkRV13 5Olf+nbqxo9efW22SPX6n3QdlWfZX4LxBjulUbLbPnj0zpmx84XWw7Mwcz991Cev5Wae13 NGXI8+zyosKLCMD79XVnir6V9sl9eW9aXFmenqMxq89u+XjWAEZwg+saB1g8TB0JlTiuCU13 z1xWJzDp2m6tg6xzK8CqTTE086uPqF5htGzrsXHjRvXBrWQCaDGFvEP7ALx5+wYREeFYsXyZ13 +rSlvKIlv2cYY54+cRpxK1epdVEhmc1t0bw5YmIWKKt66NAh9RmNO7SiF+lWHjl5Vk0YJSUl13 Yey4CLRt15HuZor1u0ngy44QQz09NVkk2cc7B1gZ2uvXvz2cHNXcaqpoSFB6qLYkJZRpvOl13 LkJfA2gVAlQ3Ry6YGRljQJ8gPKdHIPTyyXM162w8uBxGn12GkJOLymi77h9PHz9+XKQ9IKe13 PHli+Pr1a3vt6VeJ3Zfpw4sPex49ejRcm5RGFPYi5J7a0y+IZYkWnlU3E0ffriTXXt6TcT13 n2HGdqR9OEzoj9r1R8SyupG+rchL9+mctrf+nj339KLLByk6SxHcts6Aqd2cUYWwowaTHX13 1kHGxZVgHVgKlRv6I7hTP8RMn4ONm7Zg1+692L1nLw4ePESAXqBLeglVKpZTwjxr2hSMDB2G13 8xcvqLhSJocOHjqMi6cv4uE9jWwcVsspQjOmT0fLls1xm27teYL0wIH9Kl6V79cKnzxxQoH313 AMuQF7dnz56Dt+eKSu6c9cuuLq6KddVQCrWUtYsZQZYJpx+vlnlCtXTr0rKmunsj4nVj7113 9TEBqAXjzNWrVqtz+aJClYqV1RqYfJtIZpSFPn74iG3LN8K1fD4qrnLQWVYRFbb0+qXZnEB13 9149KqHtxv8ZIqj8GEoEfPjwIYCuY8Djp08DHjx4GEAvxlib5ZuJoYo3Q4OG2tMf9O+ml29e13 +kdd2nDFM64ldOZS+FbUgM4O+bRlFeTqWxwlqpVFn5ZdMG8HGxan4CkffuUpRPLKLt9jh4713 rtYmHz19Cvmy+4WLV7B79x40bNQYJ8+cUrOmBwkWeW1MWL5ZGzV9pvp0oZAsrcj+xkDGr5oH13 D+junqOre0zxIYJawC3lnTl3AXNmRqNmjVppXzl4yZhw4aLFkG1phvKhLA8PBVCx7ELUvgrc13 AsRFC2MQHx8vi+lp18aPHw8HOxts1E4SUXBVTCsL5KmzvUJ3b99B9QaMx4O9oLOhLnSW10SG13 +X7wXBOA7oenH+1zbO4nu1m+dyIo6xGgQeevQuiVQt6OxZ0H2NJoiuo7k2yw6Hijxukq13 fY7Oumy5oiF+WlABOttoNbfXRpaRvrCt4IlWFRtg+pgobFq3FXv3HVJxpIBMWUTyPoI1lS9c13 uY5hwaEYNjRYzZIGBvZBn8BeuHvtq+l5pPji9dvqJAKWugQuJyFi9cCMGD+uE049FdtKCb13 ZT8ugSkfXZbllv0HDuL0qdMIGz1avT6WSvI62aYtm5UFlQ0JskY2aviINCv5e3Ty9CkFZjdX13 F2zVfhf31cuXGDVyDPbTK0glsdRtazVChvqmdPWrQWcV43E1YcbYPKYK9BZXg9HSuifHnY9b13 nfgs+S9boP8UEYS1ad1Ws6eVEq6PPm2wRqjy5csO2tPvnsQDfPX2w+onL18W0ib971PQ13 sXlFbcPvpdb1jfl410HGiLjtNIwKGqH0nmLYlSEGxZvxVJB45g994k7Ni7n8DZjx17kpC413 +0vemXRA3g5A7WqVlUW9e+seypcqhcAePdUEkABT3tGUTbLmyVRUdNRyscHW7akgOPG9eso13 VrQo6tVrgK3bd2Ljlq2YGx2NqTNmImrmbEyOisLkyZMxd+5c+BYthjYtWqj7hD58IBrV6+p13 F7vlDQMDxple7l7o3Kkztiduw6s32lfFtCSzto4Ojsj0U8ZPdhIJGEW5yG8q9ajdBlmLGkBn13 HQEZT89CvgaROqMtIF1YEzrzKsB0UQ34bR98iXGNbJf720liwzdv3rixLdnZjIxUWN8pz7M13 n4Nuq5n2VIfWNufjl8+TL1++nP6rBN8Nsb76b978Km39f2Z0t9CJ86dc0vlc+euuNHyuSXd13 OvUc307umvVkWF3C2SNrwO7RsVR2bEoxnYLwU4CJIlWZPPWneQdahkkcedObN+1B1t37EZC13 4q403rZtBxK2JCBu3XoF4uGjRqsvGsifE739+A4N6tZX78eFjx2rqQodsUKrBSQMo4dNSqM13 LmtN9dcL79+9VtzR44Oh3x3tV9QEDbQNd2+bTv202rv3HcA+w4cYux6nGC+gbp16qAx3eSb13 N2+lfXlP6N7du+jXuyyeuWFra2d2kMp+z1lr6XM4MqvbD4wNTGBhakJY1hXPn+r9u4UkvJk13 bbZJjdrI7K8HneQO0NnbMAWgv8u0rMsqw3JtEww+MWt4G1R7Of+v5naUtqZz+PN8nOV13 W7fcbpGdu0Hn3PTiZw8FakcNW06IsaNQafCyN7gB1ydPaEcfOC8MrrAHd9C1QoVRb+jPFq13 1vBHmdKlUblSVVSrWlPNupYoXgTlypWFfLQ3Pcu7kWVKl1Hb4apUqYKyzCPCL1XkzXN12e13 YPHipQho2QLVq1ZDaZ9S8C1eAqV9fdC6WWN52RYF8uVHzLz5Ki4UksmZILrIlfwqqUmbyhUr13 olSp0ihbpqLiMqXLokP79vBw90C58hWxYcMmWr6X6t70dOZMsryOpP4fNKBNGzRp0lStYbs13 0UPt+21BK+xsb4MtG1JiUCFZC5UlotJsf1abzMgRXAw5BvsgRyfvb2QX6Hb0RMMRXdVXACek13 6ZZa2pPLEKb+dfy1vep45O1p5PV+79oOnQkf+IOhzli+PO+ibwEnfDI56pnA2tIKDuTVs13 zSxhpG+gdtL8q2xsYAgTQyPkyJ4drVq1wvr1G9SmhA8fP+IaLd+mjVuwYslyxC2PRdKe3XQ313 V6NCxQrQ183NGDYYu7ZvSwOqxJHiAsvXywf076WUFNZ3gcc2H8gPAlSmdjpz+sycut9OrV13 a4waEwZPNzckbk2xoLt371ZvZchXx41oee3M2S8GZnBgH0VttYzVn38tb7wT84PevY2tjh13 a2xvY64j679f9jUxIyxoCFjPDf1H5yjRo5Ss6snT53BlStX1adONidsw5w50ahXvy4sDU1g13 klsf3nm81Je45RUemfEVcP8eyQTRmNGjYcp7s2TOoqxxt27dsGBBjFovZTyozfklPX2HEG913 g9QrZK3EL17B6JAgQJKsViaW8DBzh4Otlvnx8g9drONqY4yk91sjWCmnwW5c+vKP2XB13 08tLPuvP3zxwcHCEmZkpTPVzwdnCAG7WRnCx1oexXlb1trx8QrOkry86t2uJkIF9MG50sOLB13 fXuiZZP6ajkkr7srHMz04Wihx3sNoZs1k9q+5+2dH1V9yqBr506YEDYC82bMxrKF8zB3xixE13 hg1H757dkcDA5b6OWHJWNQgRxbYmuaGk6U+68zY9Ctt+cE+NNOjGLluPv5IWLl2MJ3dkl13 y+IUL1i4HPMWLFOqWmLl67kb2xKiUreCzncYieswyjR0dg+LBQBAsj0FBXRA6pCdChgzB13 iJARCB83CXPmL1bPSH3W4qUpz5odvRBjwyYgZGgIRgUH8r6BGNQ3BIP79cGIob0RyjInTp6J13 GHXPqpT7WM0dfBPgzTpVOm7G51z5Thr9wdXL3LVtTouu2rXJ1cjVylc8In96S1gely13 PT3LPZ+UwfLT3vv4u+tHzn1Pp9z3X8Vk7flv8Pf63s3+Nvvedb8ulYFwvD52xVYgysfT5l13 y+KjYS3pZJsSYbApuV9qWxbYizstPx5vtT0r137nOV6al7rP8krnD6LeuYvr5p92vT0tqW13 eq7N92d1+iucvj5fq9e3tOkLTlfmv7Oun7DUkX1j48OxMoz0rfnjjz+76V5ZmpZXzt+Zz13 H8lb+vFVnDru6cf+T9M+K1PLvzu+2vvU8Vfyqfulntpnpeb7Gus4lp2Iz9k03wiYug+DqTd13 yU6lIuBSdjzMvUNh4jwIVt4j4VpuIlzLT1LsWGYCrIqPg32pSHWvU8EjJxDYJJnBBx4r3O513 CWll2mOh1HeUTAvEgbnMhFp6V9jW98ImHiGwijPcPWMr+VJzzY+42DiHgIjpyGsC+tbcCRM13 XIbCuvAYOJSNVGxHoTPNy7bl03LeELiwHmb8NXYPVh3oWm78V8vq2zHjBlXxm5h8KswCi413 sQ9dSrNNeUcoti3xx+3KpeeACMPjgPZoWQEnMr+eb8FbYvGQkL9repazDMPELYp+Ecv5Rx13 TcsjY6iVDzv2s4kb2+c5gm2LZF+Hqf438uJ5OcpGuvu+lZ0pW2b5R8HYJZgAfL5n7ON7zgl13 b6Z8piP71718pGJbyqT0s1Xh0XAqMw6WBUfB1FMr15RxewLAvvhYmHmFpqVZFRmj8lrkYT7X13 wbAoMFyNmfNX+tmJbFl4LMdjOIEWToyw3gVGqr4zZR86lRkPB9bdrvR4mLF86RfbomPZL0z313 HcsxHKrwJG11Zt7Pyxf+AqAWbJRP7RkoXHmqergnb3QuOR653YLZmDFo0GYePHzGQp8VkIrn13 thsMA9tBqiMdCEyDAqOR22EIajWfh+I1pyGHGwHCTpCyHQgypzKRyF9xEvJXmgwndqxXxQnw13 rBD5BbuzEW5sWI3mc1ArYAHsS4yjohjPjkpKBl8NyqHVLYuNg652dFVmkVjaGg8cotyIGA713 9Y5F5abRsCTwzFmPvBUjUaTyJPj6R8Gv8SzYc0AMHAbxfCrqt12g2utIoZR6SbnphUyUUfpn13 pufPhVHaas+yvP0mojDLyldhPEyLjmLjmHfTkbRKlPgykF3IGgdZMDSsUv6cplHFF0ODq4d13 +9jUezQCeqxAx94r2Hh8KAgpu83F60yKO6Cn8NPBZFw5HdfijyspbdV+OVl2Xwo1lSr+n13 v8+FY+Dfah7KN5wJAwJg6MhNaNxhEfSoTK0pbE3bL0TbnsthSOWUpnfyqZFxqJ663kYHb4F13 dsXGUrFFIglRdiLnL7ORlQIWZyCUavlXJSoORXZnYNVvzgSAIZU0PmqTIZ7hYkwLjQa3uzz13 kv7TCNTRcGM2dN4iCIvVnWKkhUHPsuTW9ReBQqN5qN+m0WwKtMOHQJOBviIv1zhS15j1Wx13 MShVaxr7O5J14dhWn4qaTedSjogNKlELylw252Hw5DjXbjmHBmEkdN1C+KwwVG00Ew3bzleg13 1aVhEeB+oxPACoaPZvjYGzZcxE37zzFleu4PqtxyhfezoK+E3AlRuQPPoBc5f0qAShTuz13 bT+MjNyKnUmXMCE6CSbeo5ArTyiSkq7jvuYFbt19ioFjN0EXyicqF3tqJ3rd1yMG7efYPaS13 w7B27IOsNkHIat4vhe0HIavrUGS17I+sFgNQhoriyPGb2LrrMuydeyCzUW8YUkM5+IZB13EQ13 spjyfvO+yJV3OLI4DkXfUetx55TnDh7F45UKGcvPMD9B88R0G+lAmcOaqtOg9awbU9wm3W713 ++AZzl9+AL8GMzBh1h48YNtq1ZuOzBZ9kdWwF7IY9EIu24EEhrgpY5CN6SrNbiBMKEQ5+ZuF13 +XJY91eWJH1fOtN6ehQZjXVbz6nnJV98ACuHgajWeq46v0Wu1XgOMhv2RWaDnopz2gxUnkVO13 WqSsDsHI5TEMWSz7oXTNKGzacR7t+q6CmXUXrNx4GvOXH4EFtXJWXkrP7IZx0Cen0P6x5h913 SwVqmH80dB2Gsq69Vf2zWgTBrNAYKtjfrIIVraL07ahJ29WYL4Fc5f0cCKeuo11P1tepv13 +wGo1GY+7j98gZkLD8DcPhAXL93HitjDMHPui0nz9uHhLy8xLWYfMurzPssg1oPPtR4IaaZ13 Xv6RyGLFfqPQZ6WFzurGNkq2rF+5hx3KveMzDtx2k5cvvYQxnlCkMUkZTyEsP5jjQYUmfp13 czOCaVPiBdbnuZK3oeO2QJ9WMrNeD0yclYQb7OfJCYjN63xnJgD7PenuHz9Ea6xjYH949C+13 62KcPX8fV2+gquU79FTd6Iswbn2A0lD2d4rSNlxohW2KX8RIJdAD8ZNoVofQuNxIK4Y7h913 7yn6DI+HJ63trgNXKfvPVR9OXbAP2Qw7oxmVqTxP+uzi1YfQo1fXud9q3KP8CZ4EV4UIcgGp13 BxVi6pgIfwJQ0RLSSVcJzGXrTqJpzxWo024h9EwDcfDANRwjWPIWG4kd+68gasEBGNoNwIDh13 GD+w0fMXHoYOewHwrFHAr+c9QLiEHrzksomBoUp9azoXaxoVDUaT4X+BUYFpEAQ7okuZe13 xrhZu7Bl53nMYINad1G59xCWOQW5CsSjF37LiORHBq5DdeuPUKFhrNgRBAPiUzAsdN3sJN113 8ak8EUV8h2P4Wt49PAlipQci+a9U5cdrCfXSpaU1pzTLZ9IdxyVqnbN796WwosUVoG7e13 fRHdh6zDQ3Zg1aph6N5JV6+fIsrfN7wyERYiOtD7Tpv2WG8efueHb8flgRSFH+vXnmMeYsP13 wqZYOMw5aI7KFZpAbciOppu0aecF1uOj2r+bx3s4lsWfwLv3H3H79lNUqDgaYPj8PrVO9y613 +Rgh7BOzvKHoSCBOozC17rEUg0ZtwLS5Sao+MauOIrdxIDoOWI0W9AwkzJi59CAmUjnOWXoI13 SceuwYcWIxcFfPSkHUimgopmum3JcZjAMk4l30fC3ovYceAKKlFRmIs7x7o60dqb5RuFZrSa13 z1++QSzH3tgsEGbU8mIhphJ09+49wbGzt1GvYwyKFR+GmxS4SfP3wdh2AAaO2YiOvVagbv0Z13 0FAxb+JY2joPhje9hh1Jl3H9+mOMnbkbxlRQLbosRhTr0m3wGvQfuRGNuy1FHBXOoLAt2L7n13 EhbHnYCd13DUpYUOm7IdJrSCwydsx7Mnr9hnT9BtWDxyuobQbQxX1rtR56V4wHGr1CQadTss13 xoVLD9ivI1Gg4nhcZ7HT15gNscnI0G+fMVRHCTwqraej65D18IuTz8Ej1iFM5fuofnPS9GO13 ijwPQajPcg2sesCFodC7dx84FvvpHQQT+KHQdx8OMyrr3FQCvVjGdY6b5OkVso7Y6UN3OQRO13 VEJ7D11XCsbOoTP2HLpGGd9D6z8JyZc16NovDjlpVU3ohQ6j9GKYzt++i5kN+sLd+ZJj8lP13 ACpxZHb7IcpyHqfwB4fisYB82Fg1gtX+bBjx67D03sItrEjt1CjW9Pi2dj2x6PHLzFj0QHk13 IACqN52lrOdAdv6YsM1KQ1SghRLf3qYoAdpiHvAG6DF4Pbz8JuHx09c4cfo2jh+poR4W8JJ13 3KMVFPA5lAxH7PpTuHRVgVbzuH163eYOGUbOnZdoDa4d+m9AOdpmQ4Q0GUbRePQ0Zss7xX613 DlyOmNhjaiPCLta1eO1pcK4wQQG0Ni240LRpO9CgSKleSfN2Yt2QauV5qtcZQS69VuOFauP13 4jJW8oaNGg8DXFxR9Xzo+fuRJP2CxAxfTeeP3uNdgNXM09Inmuy4G1YziUI6xJd13d69h13 2H3wGs4SGAZD5EUzPuPMf+ozeU1ixTPhQ9+8cids0JnDpD7ep7f1rTcauXSmgPsJ8EVE713 sXTlESUESUeuw4XguHvnGabMSULperOURj5PC7ZubcouqZ+p4Dr2WA4NFVUQx+DZ89cYOXE713 OvSOwer1JGW5Sxbc5yu4xhY0KIJyMUtNio0ih7IJlVGh36rlGcgMbM13dTRkxKxmMpBxvIm13 LY0omsPsm2ACx4TCKJZr89az6NBzIZ5wPE+dvYdiVSbiwImb2HfwEoaOWoO795+hUv3pSk7e13 v+AZNY5mC7skLGb8QvBF7f+NA5RkJ++eIPadafiEJWIeBrG+Yej26DVqs7XCIYXFGZnhj7G13 rINZhGoTwMi49aTwB0YvFb1R8UaI7B+w1H0GbGBiv8CZi06iAy05LFs00qGlGE7fushK1b13 X4wNj8fdu08QQQXShyDLW4qhEMvtEbxOKbLrt56gSp3pKESXOWzKDkydu49sQ0FfcIok2eU13 xU6mR9l9QBxysc8aE+jrtpzFE8pGUx7b2HbAdiopMXiNOi1WVnri7D34ybgPctFjCoYiltU13 dtUbz4Y+3XN3yml6TH4CUGsJmkFOvZYgoiJsdjFDhPwlS4zHFcJEgGoR75gJOy6hPiEc7B013 Ggo7WtG37DTp+FzOQ+mSDMM4Cmv8tmScpKt5lVaoZPUpFIbRsGIcULvJHHx8+xE9hsTDgucy13 cD3oVB1nK0AVblyKBJ3ncfxM3dgz1h3CQcmav5+GNIteMpGj52wDb3omgiVLt2DwnsYRwlw13 c5YVTi10ms+0semBH5TlCAEU8uZ0N11pzLIbNMPdTouUvfeuP2YQLmOuSuOwJ1uUuCITbhB13 AahQYQy6Bq1AJAdsSvRe5eo1pFIRoD969Bw6Oi1hZN0L83nfG1q+PrRw67Ym05VPoHs+DGZF13 R9MqEaQcwPx0gaQ+Y6YkYgtB956WcXGMwgZtxXnqOl9yg5HD1rrsVEc+Hn78YiC2qDRRAL013 nGqrT6UJ0NHrhZ4cfBnw6ozFnZxaKMsufezFWF7KGT81gfXup9r1c69YzJy9Fy9evMWwcQnK13 Gnahxc1q2RljJlMY2O4ixUcjh1kQTDnWEiNJrCzubS8KudCA0ZuRw6gLLL1D4SaCSSXRtk+s13 cnkFoJ55Q7Dv8HUMnbgN2emSSsiyPv4wfEoPZHhxh+7eRmTL1VkpmbVr96FQiX7Yd+QGWgeu13 ROiERAWoToHLlBIYNnqTaps5gd6gabS6p3HjCdi7N1m5ieZuQ9CH1rb3sHU0ChfYL2gyvjO13 gF6NdYlxyisbE7UL67XyJh5VBYZfR07dQviMXbh85SEOn7gNX7qQ9VvOxOgxMYjffp6ewlv013 GBiLUn7jMXRojFLYQlGzdsOMHlr3wAWIjFytvMGIyYmoxNBnzOQdmDHAL2qbWhCT+DarV8w13 Z9kh5eIK+N2pTOo0jkJY2Gpcvnwfm7Ynw8FjABq2momVG06zblfxkjIzNGwTQ42ejJvnKa9h13 8JCVyEk3375EOBXmHwDUyieCVmscWnZdiMr1w7E24Sx+oQUpQ4CuiDuCa9cfYvAImnVWLIRa13 NRfBae8yGB8peLOXHIIug2JrWsm67RfCjGjCOcGdpwLtbUDO9OawXBtCpkAcQi1mDsFWQZr13 EN3kzlQKQpUrh+MsBn4mbvwKBuJuE1nqL2PMT4eg1e0YAsX7UOP3ovw8deP8G8yidr6Dg5Q13 kViwU2fRlRE31ZHxV5k6M1V5o8ZshhldCWcG8ZkZrzXvsUylT6bLUZTtMmWnisssSuAaPYdy13 HMgTVA4XqJAmUtBfv3mPlm1mYOmkxT6N2jTeRFs6HZNjN6jANeO1iZ5cl0jSagSvN5ynVz13 kGl2trk4Nf1dWpduvZcjhLH4YwKwaqv5GMs4RyxoubrTWf+7OMXnybNevHqLZi2mE6DnlWLU13 cx8KHfMgDKaVEes9la6Wi2tXehjPGDPvVZNwFwia+Uv3E6Chql0C0O50oeRZQ6mdi1SbCi9a13 8yZdlqiYShRmpbrTUICxTn+6lZUZckhoY0gXt3KzubRAj1Tc1bztLJRmvgC6vUJjp+1inzxU13 rm1BjsU55hk9NREGeUKVBd29+ywqULleufGIwKA3YdhVuaVbEs8hoFuMsoZV60zDZHorohzr13 0NPS0e2FCcwrVtG94gQ0oPJMAehEHDx8UeUrWSuKiusllsQdx06GQwLQvLQyep4hsC8ZocBa13 n55QqdpRuEIwxqw4BjeORRjBKSGJkMSctTvEoEbT6ShZaRhiGDeKpe8SuIIAjUSNBhHoxmPx13 4CbN2Al3GpPyNSJQhuHOSa7WECX0uPoWgcjN+NEPYZG1VvOp1E6iAP0ckQOzrM8tB7qlxv13 CirWjMRhGrO3DIesqPyLV41A+XozMGfxIeXBFKk+GX7si5Pn7imQL1t2AFPmJzEUG06ciFfz13 G0gAage3RmXUuGqQeLmiiCMnrQdRl5D4cKH7z98k4LzCutpMTx8qcUktis6CveZL2blMRh613 j4AP3clTyfdUHHno2E1UbTiTrggfXDYC9uQW7IgnFJTJtE5lqJUkUO48YA019Erc4SCWrzVd13 aUOJc4vVmKbchYV0VwtWm8Rnv1Ad6FggVMUtZ+g6Pn1O0HRbDFvXlhF63Thwn3YeYSgQvM513 tHgvGedsghnjRZnVzEYL37najznPeMJUJlCt6EbbV4iDNMZ851mJ5fwm4CoeXuVMKdfE4J13 bKPW81Co4kTsYYwrCiWEGtWu1Dhs33VRCfMmavbGPyDZMZqU+l6mhUYoeK3EgSgALHH4NUo13 STdJLIIVNf88Wv1LNx+iXI0pWLj8MB4wJFifkKzqXpux13K619cIBruSjJsdh6IGhSH54n0F13 ugp16P4dv8H67odfo1l0x9iNGM1XwraA7rP4qaZ2QE+s1n1LMPcAz6hW7AamrwpwS9eATr13 2L9GH4IaOp3XAgTmfDgeBrRbWzfNxZXbj8i6J4gkYJZsWE0tu28hKNHb2H3vsvYxxiuOJXY13 MXotE2bugUeFSbh9i+Mfsw8lSo3GkZM31eSRkUlPtO+ZMqYSCyYwznekMp9MC5V84Tb8W85B13 VschGElr9JRg8Wbs3KFvnOqjKo2m09M4haOUIQfGmssY5oj13r7nMt3h17SGUTCmS25J61+x13 GUOb4zdpJW8qT6o0DUMWu0EwsR8AZdeKjyaT+9OllJWsswLBLG41AsorxbuwYgikGUCRyYX13 Za6joG842tE6Hqfiv8B4UTy8Vt2W09UeCQsqJgt6RrIkYsXnm1j3RJtOc1We9kErUbB4iDIY13 l4mdh5STYfQwTG170cU+oJS+xMphU3ZC17ofhrDRUncfvBUzUkcP3kb2WRJsHhY2krFFwC113 LzNBTXbI2qAxrYSRRzByOgyi6Q2DHv1yA2pzEcR0LMcCDPv0WopQVwkU1bevMAo3hsGYwqn13 iVsILNkAQ5vBMHIZBjdqnzwVxlPb0YrK+hZdY0uWZ01wm7gNQ25aOEOyEdMN3ENhIGtGdEuN13 i4yCKYXG0GMYdAlycVVNCJ+am1dDoCLT0pd9SiQ8myzfCNhymu2RcPU9LyxENLXFg6ZWZM13 1iWtCo6GCX19SwLFjho4NV3WogzZ3mzurA89A1mjMjDqDSPHgbBkJyToDcw7wsTttuE5eeg13 NtVnTGvMulqwzT7U5Bu3nUfd+jNhX3gk3NhWW9bBjP1owr7IyXoY5x2FXGyPcT62hcR9QxV13 dZdnGZoGsq+GwJT9aExX2YT9JmNhX3qCeoYhrakJY1rdPBwH9q+hVwj06ULLuq8u22zGdkm13 WuUdCX2WL3UzyxcKy8JjaOVGwJya3ESexXQD497oQUW5bN0p2PN5tlTKEjeL8EmGrEuVizb13 ku56btZJX9Y1GSpS39QyZnSHTZ0C1VjpivjzfoaMoEhCasl9TFjoDPZtsf1gSBLKfp0atR13 64x040Q+zOmaOsgxyxIZ0MsbynaOUjJgzDKMvTj+bK8erYqu0zAY23M8TPuosTOnEIvsCZsW13 Zrv5fGvW15DyacR7ZcnDqwJj61IRan3TosAYmNMqGrMZNLJhMSZUwqZZsW4HhyXGQpS99h13 IPQoAyYiY8wn3qCR7WAYUI5sqZBTJgAnwolxu6PsA6AXIn1nVZztoKwayLjmH03lPJbjNwQ513 rSiX7H99jrk839x5EHKyT2RZxYzpxuwTYa1jIkYMSvK8+frZ8ANJVlHSo7BdKYg+fKG9zK13 T1bsTGGRuMWxTKQ6l4qKAMmSgyUHIXUdz5SCpUeBdyo7Hnmp2WXdLLVs2cxgUzRcCZMrMqv13 naxBsTNTBJJuNu8Tt0vKsmK5NnSPHTngws4EmzxbjvUEjARmav0cfCPZqSyXdRJWxyUj4Zxu13 zc9eFtOZLpy6sUKlM5+kSRulLFn8Tn2mi7YPXFmOMV1BySfnUhd9eh16FDwnDpQdBU6E1o1g13 daPAO1ExSd9YM2yQtkib3FiGPdsrZbjKAri0W1w1qYf2eWmsXU4QNi9M5cdnSzmyfmer7W8p13 U9iZdZQy7bTPsmcfypqpKYVTypdZZzmXY2FZBfQmhccAYyvz1H1mDt6ZrnZt9acKylnTLe13 qffZ8tlSvjwn9VkybrIpQNZs7fgr9fBgupQr9dan0pDNDVKWk7SJbXNm26WPpP1ftDsdy3KV13 HUMvGwq1nMu4yOJan2FpY2iOB14Lf0kiwBYyabIF+tjwbpIH5gzvwvb6EWAyeYWY4JKgCWy13 J2mubJeslcqSlSg4NdZfWTcWtqRsyv327ANX6XMqHrlP1v5T1qJT5FLGTvpJxl+Vx7qJXKf213 q7XI21fKypApeBUr2KRH2b2Snv4Z6dnpG58nfros0gt7fpi2XHitRBdluZFRxDASQw13 Pwv0y7+Wv8Ky2YDCwqLCKzsopIdMenvk+sqb7qxSD9m6fP+EUu5qff8K3L07+avtetrnF6213 0rub38IyI556r7K0X8mTyun79PMxSOWvAvQH+AfH3wD4D+4B8HfMPgP7gHzd8kT8H4Jf13 YBWl2ExBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC1313X-MS-OL-DESIGNCHARSET=utf-8ltcard xmlns=httpschemasmicrosoftcomofficeoutlook12electronicbusinesscards ver=10 layout=background bgcolor=ffffffgtltimg xmlns= align=bmid area=50 use=cardpicturegtltfld xmlns= prop=name align=left dir=ltr style=b color=000000 size=10gtltfld xmlns= prop=org align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=title align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=dept align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=telwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=email align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=addrwork align=left dir=ltr color=000000 size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltfld xmlns= prop=blank size=8gtltcardgt13REV20171121T212113Z13ENDVCARD13

City of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Luttropp MattTo Reyes BrianneSubject RE DR12-18 Pease New Project ReviewDate Thursday September 27 2018 40736 PM

Brianne Sorry for the delayed response on this project I have the following comments

1 The applicant has done a good job trying to lessen impermeable surfacing as part of thisproject If possible he should consider additional permeable surfacing in the large patio andpool surround area If this is not possible perhaps the grassy swale can be enlarged as itnears the overflow drain that carries water to the City storm drain system

Matt Luttropp

Engineering Manager

Engineering Services Division

City of Lafayette

Ph 9252993247 Fx 9252843169

mluttroppcilafayettecaus

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From Reyes Brianne Sent Monday September 24 2018 507 PMTo Fire District Luttropp Matt PennSubject FW DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Just a friendly reminder to please provide any comments on the new Design Review Permit projectby no later than Tuesday September 25 2018 Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Reyes Brianne Sent Wednesday September 19 2018 148 PMTo _ReferralSubject DR12-18 Pease New Project Review Hi All Please review the materials for DR12-18 Pease in the download link belowProvide comments to Brianne Reyes as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday September 252018This application will be tentatively heard at the Design Review Commission Meeting on October 92018 httpseftpmbakerintlcommessageHjQIB6BtrKAq41BxcXkUC6

If you have troubles with the link please let me know Thanks Ms Brianne ReyesAssistant Planner ndash Contract PlannerCity of LafayetteDirect (925) 299-3207 | Main (925) 284-1976wwwlovelafayetteorg How are we doing Please take a moment to fill-out our customer satisfaction form hereWeekly Schedule Monday through Thursday from 800AM-500PM

From Alan GuyTo Fox JonathanSubject narrativeDate Thursday October 15 2020 101258 AM

My wife Johanna and our baby girl Madeline currently live in downtown San

Francisco We always thought we would stay in the city a few more years before we

moved to the East Bay and when that time came we always dreamed of moving to

Lafayette Madeline was born in early April just as COVID was taking hold As the

shutdowns continued so did the decline of the city and as a result we accelerated our

timeline to move out of the city

We quickly found this property and fell in love ndash and it was an added bonus that it

came with ldquoshovel readyrdquo plans After carefully reviewing the existing plans we

decided that this was our opportunity to build our dream family home and found that

some minor updates were needed to achieve that goal

The property was wonderfully designed for a couple in their 60rsquos nearing retirement

age however the layout included some features that were not necessary for a young

family (formal living and dining rooms access ramps) Additionally it was important to

us for all bedrooms to have en suite bathrooms After many studies our design team

figured the easiest way to accommodate this was to push the bedroom wing towards

the front and rear property lines to add the ~400sf This would keep the front and rear

elevation view almost unchanged

We also want to modify the exterior aesthetic from a traditional craftsman to a

transitionalmodern farmhouse style that more aligns with current architectural design

trends Alan Guy | PresidentANVILBUILDERS1475 Donner Ave | San Francisco California 94124o 4152855000 | c 4155187911 | f 4152855005alananvilbuilderscom |wwwanvilbuilderscom

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT | This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privilegedby law If you received this e-mail in error any review use dissemination distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibitedPlease notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message from your system Thank you in advance foryour cooperation

From Lori DoyleTo Reyes BrianneCc Brian Doyle Lori DoyleSubject DR12-18 Mathey amp Leslie PeaseDate Sunday September 30 2018 92118 AM

Brianne

We are the residents of 3650 Happy Valley Road the property adjacent to the abovereferenced property

Our house is situated so that the back of our house faces the referenced propertyand the back of our house has various windows that allow us to enjoy the view ofour back yard Based on the outline of the house that was erected this past weekwe will be seeing a lot of the house from our back yard

I dont want to object to the house in general but I would like to confirm that thehouse is situated such that windows on the house are not facing our propertyparticularly our backyard I know the design says it is a single story home but theoutline of the house looks taller in areas and I cant tell from the information on thewebsite what the exterior of the house that would face our property looks like

Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated

RegardsBrian and Lori Doyle

From Steven KubitschekTo Reyes BrianneSubject DR12-18 Pease ResidenceDate Sunday September 30 2018 50135 PM

Dear Ms Reyes I am a neighbor of the future Pease Residence and I am not available to attend the DRC meeting on9Oct I live at 3626 Happy Valley Glen Rd in Lafayette 2 properties away from The Pease Residence Iam happy to learn that a new home is coming into our neighborhood and that the property is beingdeveloped in a responsible way The two attached pictures are views of the Story Poles of The Pease Residence from my back yardpatio Considering that the home is a single story the visual impact seems excessive at 24rsquo10rdquo Manyvery successful single story homes are designed at 21rsquo and under in Lafayette This home appears tobe taller than the 2-story home The Vesce Residence (which can be seen in the two photosprovided) that stands between me and The Pease Residence It might be appropriate to have the DRC request that the architect for the Pease Residence lowerthe pitch of the main ridge of the home Thanks Steven F KubitschekResidential DesignOffice 925-254-2167Cell 925-348-3182BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY NEW WEBSITEwwwkubitschekdesigncomkubihouscomcastnet Please note The electronic file if supplied is being done so as a courtesy and convenience and is subordinate tothe signed hard copy with respect to content accuracy and quality No warranty or guarantee is made expressedor implied for any copies of the drawings or for the work associated with the electronic file by others

  • 00 DR12-18CC DRC Staff Report 20201028
    • PUBLIC NOTICE amp COMMENT
      • STAFF RECOMMENDATION
          • 01 DR12-18CC DRC Resolution 2020-12 DRAFT
            • BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE APPROVING
            • sect6-275(A) Residential Design Review Findings
            • sect6-275(C) Single-Family Residential Findings ndash Exceeding 17-Feet in Height
              • 02 DR12-18CC COA DRAFT
              • 03 Aerial
              • 04 DR12-18 Pease DRC Resolution 2018-22-FINAL
              • 05 DR12-18 Pease COA-FINAL
              • 06 Excerpt Minutes 20181009
                • 20181009
                  • 07 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 2018109 FINAL
                  • 08 Excerpt Minutes 20181126
                    • 20181126
                      • 09 DR12-18 Pease SR DRC 20181126 DRAFT
                      • 10 DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                        • DR12-18 Referral Agency Comments
                          • 2734 Happy Valley Rd (DR12-18 Pease) Landscape Review
                            • Dear Brianne
                            • We have reviewed the proposed plans with a revised date of August 27 2018 to construct a new 5083 SF single family residence on a vacant lot located at 3654-A on Happy Valley Road
                            • Also reviewed was an arborist report dated September 7 2018 prepared Traverso Tree Service
                            • Site Summery
                            • The 101 acre SF vacant lot is located along the eastern shoulder of Happy Valley Road just north of the Deer Hill Road intersection The level rectangular lot retains a few mature walnuts a deodar cedar a London plane tree and six valley oaks (m
                            • Potential view impacts as a result of the proposed development include the following
                            • Moderate for the adjacent residences south of the property at 3650 amp 3652 Happy Valley Road
                            • Significant for the adjacent residence to east at 3654 Happy Valley Road
                            • Insignificant to minor for the residence to the northeast at 3656 Happy Valley Road
                            • Minor for the residence north of the site at 3658 Happy Valley Road
                            • Proposed plantings can help mitigate view disruptions
                            • Existing Trees and Mitigations
                            • All proposed tree removals are consistent with the cityrsquos objective of retaining healthy amp native protected trees on sites to be developed Trees deemed for removal on site are either in decline or have been disfigured due to overhead utility lines
                            • 1 The proposed Tree Mitigations Calculations chart (shown on Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan) quantifies required replacement trees per the cityrsquos tree ordinance Mitigation replacement trees are typically specified as the species removed (ex
                            • To achieve a greater portion of the required mitigations consider locating one or two additional Arbutus lsquoMarinarsquo along the southeastern property line (east of the lsquo18rdquo oakrsquo) The evergreen trees would help buffer views for the neighboring residence
                            • As an alternative the applicants may elect to satisfy a portion of the mitigation costs via in-lieu payment Recent costs for 15 gallon replacement trees have equaled $263 per tree
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-40 Proposed Planting Plan
                            • 2 Consider planting small to medium sized shrubs between the proposed lsquoback-up spacersquo and Happy Valley Road to help buffer the feature for views from the road
                            • Recommendations for Sheet L-60 Conceptual Drainage Plan
                            • 3 To ensure adequate drainage and cover over the proposed drain lines please provide drain inlet and invert pipe elevations
                              • DR12-18 Fire Comments
                              • DR12-18 CCSD Comments
                                • DR12-18 Engineering Comments
                                  • 11 DR12-18CC Applicant Narrative
                                  • 12 DR12-18 Public Comments
                                    • DR12-18_Brian amp Lori Doyle_2018930
                                    • DR12-18_Steven F Kubitschek_2018930
Page 15: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 16: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 17: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 18: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 19: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 20: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 21: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 22: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 23: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 24: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 25: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 26: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 27: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 28: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 29: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 30: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 31: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 32: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 33: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 34: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 35: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 36: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 37: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 38: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 39: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 40: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 41: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 42: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 43: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 44: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 45: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 46: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 47: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 48: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 49: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 50: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 51: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 52: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 53: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission
Page 54: C ity of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission