c. pilotage, bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005 indicang – interreg iii « yellow eel surveys » pascal...
TRANSCRIPT
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Indicang – Interreg III
« Yellow eel surveys »
Pascal LAFFAILLE Thomas CHANGEUXChristian RIGAUD
CST, Bordeaux, 14 décembre 2005
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
The yellow stage : a long and diversified growth phase between 2 short migratory phases
The yellow local« stock » : links with the local colonization level and the further downstream migration
Glass eels Silver eel
6 months 6 months
3 to 20 years (or more)
Some recalls…
Within a catchment area, two compartments with very different
characteristics and functionings :
- the estuary (below the tidal limit )
- the river compartment (above the tidal limit)
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
To take into account economical considerations and to
set up durable surveys and analysis, some basic rules :
• maximal valorization of the available informations from
qualitative or semi-quantitative surveys already performed
even if they are not specific
•To perform complementary operations only if we judge
that these new collected data are absolutely needful.
• To try quantify only within the catchments or areas
where it’s technically possible.
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
It seems important, to federate our thoughts, that we identify the two main questions (targets) the indicators we ‘ll elaborate, have to contribute to answer:
Q1 : What are the characteristics of the eel presence within a given catchment area ?
Q2 : Are the characteristics of this catchment area favourables for the eel ?
With two main targets
- to contribute to the initial diagnosis
and then
- to contribute to the evaluation of the impacts of the
management actions decided and performed to improve the
initial situation.
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Using the available data, some preliminary identifications
- Colonizable area : defined by upper limits pragmatically fixed
- Colonized area : with eel presence (whatever the observed sizes)
- Active area : with presence of young stages (<15 or<30 cm)
Diagnosis of the eel state within a catchment area
Example:Gironde catchment
Data from the French multispecific survey network (RHP) from CSP
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Sampling sites
Sampling within shallow sites (on the main axis or within tributaries) with a good fishing efficacy, accessible and well used by the small eels if they are present at this part of the catchment
Different items
Abundance index
Biomass index
If necessary to specify the situation along some axis, to perform complementary sampling operations
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005 Diagnosis of the eel state within a catchment area
Yellow Eel abundances
Example :
Yellow eel presence index in 2000 within the Loire catchment area
> 10 ind / 100 m2 (5%)
2.5 à 10 ind / 100 m2 (9%)
Laffaille, Lasne, Baisez, Steinbach, Vigneron, 2004. Comité Scientifique COGEPOMI Loire
< 0.1 ind / 100 m2 (51%)
0.1 à 2.5 ind / 100 m2 (35%)
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Within the deep compartments (estuary, main rivers)
If presence of a fishery ,
different useful data may be collected :
• catch per unit of effort for each type of gear
• regular observations of the biological characteristics of the captures (size, ocular diameters, weigth)
• tests for mortality rates estimation (size structure analysis)
Diagnosis of the eel state within a catchment area
Yellow Eel abundances
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005 Different targets concerning the further yellow eel surveys
Evolution trends : Ok if positive and regular trends are observed for all the life stages (glass eels, then yellow and silver eels)
Asked Questions : Amelioration rate (slope) ? / How to fix the good limits to be attained ? (theorical limits, historical limits ?……)
Silver escapment estimation : Trends are not sufficient, management has to obtain the escapment of 40 % of the silver eels that would be produced by the watershed only with natural mortality (without fishery, turbins, pollutions,…..).
Observations :
- Natural mortality is not known for each life stage in the different environments
- The amounts for the fisheries may be announced in « equivalent glass-eels » or in « equivalent silver eels »
Biomass targets : Management has to obtain the escapment of a given biomass of spawners, estimated from the characteristics of the watershed (1, 5, 10, 20, ….50 Kg/ha/an?)
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Nantes
Limoges
Poitiers
Angers
Laval
Le Mans
Saint-Etienne
Le Puy
Bourges
Besancon
Chateauroux
Tours
Orleans
Nancy
Clermont-Ferrand
*Limites arbitraires
Recrutement *
Recrutement *
Recrutement *
Bassin versant (115 000 km²)
Zones inaccessibles (19000 km²)
= Surface colonisable(96000 km²)
-
+
-
Evolution survey of the eel state within a catchment area
Evolution trend surveys
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
fort
moyen
faible
Rec
rute
men
t fl
uvi
al
et s
tock
d’a
ng
uill
e ja
un
e en
pla
ce
estuaire aval amont
continent
Colonization index
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
-20 30 80 130
Distance en km à la limite tidale
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0D
ensi
tés
rela
tives
d’a
ngui
lle
D_PLUS450D_450D_300D_150
Densités relatives (ind/EPA) en Loire
Diagnosis of the eel state within a catchment area
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Evaluation of the restoration level of the yellow eel « stock » in
a given area (catchment, subcatchment,…) by survey of the evolution trend or by comparison with historical or theoretical levels
Identification on each site of the maximal observed abundance (MOA = level 100 %). Similar analysis with the median level or the quantile 90
Transformation on each site of the annual observed
abundances into % of the MOA or of the median level
Non linear analysis of these indexes. Analysis of the
mean trend (all sizes included or by size class) all over
the catchment or by groups of sites
Preliminary constats : very difficult comparisons between stations (type, localization), operations (used gear, period, strategy),…
So, intra-station analysis of the observed evolution trend by size group
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Example : Loire catchment area. Evolution trends (all sizes comprised between 1995 and 2003).
Comparison with the Maximal observed abundance
Augmentation (15%)
Stabilisation (19%)
Tendances 1995-2003 :
Laffaille, Lasne, Baisez, Steinbach, Vigneron, 2004. Comité Scientifique COGEPOMI Loire
Absence (40%)
Diminution (28%)
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Use as a local index
Observed densities increase after an eel ladder setting
Laffaille, Lasne, Baisez, Steinbach, Vigneron, 2004. Comité Scientifique COGEPOMI Loire
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Some very important complementary informations to perform the data analysis
To know the local evolution of the number of glass-eels entering
into the catchmant area :
N total at the estuary mouth ,
• Fishery surveys
• Specific operations
• Extrapolation from neighbouring catchments
N fluvial
• Specific surveys
• Eel ladders
…
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
1/ Basic characteristics : watershed area, river length, estuary
area, slope, mean flow, importance of wetlands
Different data are very important to characterize a given
watershed as an production area of eel breeders
Diagnosis of each watershed characteristics
ÊÚ
Garonne
Dordogne
Bec d'Ambès
Distance au Bec d'Ambès (en km)0- 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500501 - 550551 - 600601 - 650
0 100 200 Kilomètres
N
EW
S
Carte des classes de distance par rapport au Bec d'Ambèsdes cours d'eau du bassin versant Garonne-Dordogne
Carte6: Distance par rapport au Bec d'Ambès du réseau hydrographique simplifié du bassin versant Garonne-Dordogne.Source: Agence de l'eau
Analyse Cemagref
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Growth context :
Combination between « Water quality (especially heavy metals, PCB, brominated flame retardants, available habitats, …..) »
Colonization context (physical and fishing constraints):
Combination between « % river length without dams, Nb of dams/km, Nb eel ladders /km, fishing pressure,… »
Downstream migration context :
Combination between « % river length without turbins, Nb of turbins/km, Types of turbins,…… »
Moreover, several indicators have to be elaborated
These indicators may be useful to synthetically describe a catchment (or sub-catchment) area for comparisons between systems, diagnosis or evolution survey.
C. Pilotage, Bordeaux, 15 décembre 2005
Indicang – Interreg III
« Yellow eel surveys »
P. LAFFAILLE Th. CHANGEUXCh. RIGAUD
Thanks for y
our
attentio
n