caesar dimpleless bal n=10 n=14
DESCRIPTION
Methodology. Nike One Platinum 336 Dimples Smooth N=10 N=11. TitlelistPro V1x 336 Dimples Smooth N=10 N=10. Calloway Big Bertha 336 Dimples Hexx N=10 N=12. Precept Laddie 392 Dimples Steep N=10 N=14. Nike TA2-LNG 392 Dimples Steep N=10 N=10. Titlelist N-X-T - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Results
Photo Generated by Author
Graph 1- Shows the mean distance +/- standard deviations when compared to dimple number. As dimple number increased distance increased as well. Statistical analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was a significant correlation. R= .9642
Graph 2- Shows how dimple configuration effects mean distance +/- standard deviations. Dimpleless reported a significantly lower distance while none of the other dimpled patterns were significantly different. Statistical analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was a significant correlation. R = 0.9457
Graph 3- Shows the effect of dimple number on mean drag force +/- standard deviations. As dimple number increased the drag force decreased. Statistical Analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was a significant correlation. R= .9367
Correlation Between Dimple Number and Drag Force
138.396 140.008
105.969
165.812
R2 = 0.8779
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 336 392 432
Dimple Number
Dra
g F
orc
e
Graph 4- Shows how dimple configuration effects mean drag force +/- standard deviations. The smooth configuration had the least amount of drag, while the other patterns were significantly different. Statistical Analysis by Pearson (p<.05) showed that there was no significant correlation. R =.459
Correlation Between Dimple Configuration and Drag Force
165.812141.629
156.862125.2655
R2 = 0.2107
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Dimple-less Steep Smooth Hexx
Dimple Configuration
Drag
For
ce
Correlation Between Distance and Dimple Configuration
108.0454
166.3305162.0598
167.6
R2 = 0.8943
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Dimple-less Steep Smooth Hexx
Dimple Configuration
Dis
tanc
e (y
ds)
Methodology
Correlation Between Distance and Dimple Number
162.5529163.718
164.5754
108.045
R2 = 0.9297
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0 336 392 432
Dimple Number
Dis
tanc
e (y
ds)
Graph 1
Graph 2
Graph 3
Graph 4
http://eng.monash.edu.au/uicee/worldtransactions/
WordTransAbstractsVol5No3/23_NjockLibii15.pdf
Libii, 2005