california department of food and cannabis scoping... · california department of food and...

CaliforniaDepartmentofFoodandAgriculture

MedicalCannabisCultivationProgram

ScopingReport

Preparedfor:

CaliforniaDepartmentofFoodandAgriculture1220NStreet,Suite400Sacramento,CA95814

Preparedby:

HorizonWaterandEnvironment,LLC180GrandAvenue,Suite1405

Oakland,CA94612

January2017

HorizonWaterandEnvironment,LLC.MedicalCannabisCultivationProgram,ScopingReport.January2017(HWE16.015).Oakland,California.

California Department of Food and Agriculture Medical Cannabis Cultivation Program Scoping Report

i January 2017Project No. 16.015

TABLEOFCONTENTS

ExecutiveSummary Overview................................................................................................................................................ES1 SummaryoftheScopingProcess................................................................................................ES1 SummaryofCommentsReceived................................................................................................ES1

CommentsontheProposedProgramRegulation................................................ES2 CommentsRelevanttotheEnvironmentalReview.............................................ES4 CommentsOutsidetheScopeofthePEIR................................................................ES8NextSteps..............................................................................................................................................ES8 DevelopmentofRegulations.........................................................................................ES8 DevelopmentofDraftPEIR............................................................................................ES8 OngoingOutreach..............................................................................................................ES8

Chapter1.Introduction Background............................................................................................................................................11 Overview..................................................................................................................................................11Chapter2.CEQAScopingProcess NoticeofPreparation.........................................................................................................................21 PublicOutreach.....................................................................................................................................21 PublicWorkshops................................................................................................................................22 WorkshopFormat................................................................................................................23

ParticipatingStaff.................................................................................................................23 WorkshopAttendance.......................................................................................................24CommentsReceived............................................................................................................................24 OralComments......................................................................................................................24 WrittenComments..............................................................................................................24

Chapter3.SummaryofCommentsReceived ReviewofScopingCommentsReceived.....................................................................................31 CommentCategoriesRelevanttotheProposedProgramRegulations.........................33

RegulatoryGoalResponses(Nos.17).......................................................................34 LicenseTypesSought.......................................................................................................312 Type3Limits.......................................................................................................................313 Nurseries...............................................................................................................................313 InspectionsandRecords.................................................................................................314 TrackandTrace..................................................................................................................315 Other........................................................................................................................................318CommentCategoriesRelevanttotheEnvironmentalReview........................................320 GeneralCultivationPractices........................................................................................320 Aesthetics..............................................................................................................................322 AgricultureandForestry.................................................................................................322 AirQualityandOdor.........................................................................................................323 BiologicalResources.........................................................................................................324 CulturalResourcesandTribalCulturalResources..............................................327 GeologyandSeismicity....................................................................................................327

Table of Contents


ii January 2017Project No. 16.015

EnergyUseandGreenhouseGasEmissions...........................................................327 Hazards,HazardousMaterials,andHumanHealth.............................................329 HydrologyandWaterQuality.......................................................................................330 LandUseandPlanning.....................................................................................................334 Noise........................................................................................................................................336 PopulationandHousing..................................................................................................336 PublicServices.....................................................................................................................337 Recreation.............................................................................................................................337 TransportationandTraffic.............................................................................................338 UtilitiesandServiceSystems.........................................................................................338 AlternativesAnalysis........................................................................................................339 CumulativeConsiderations............................................................................................339 PEIRCEQAProcess............................................................................................................340Others ....................................................................................................................................................340

Chapter4.NextSteps DevelopmentofDraftRegulations................................................................................................41 DevelopmentofDraftPEIR..............................................................................................................41 OngoingOutreach................................................................................................................................41 ProgramWebsiteUpdates................................................................................................42 OtherOpportunitiesforPublicInvolvementintheDraftRegulations..........42 OtherOpportunitiesforPublicInvolvementinthePEIR....................................42Figures 1 CommentsReceivedbyLocationTables 1 NewspaperNotices2 PublicServiceAnnouncements3 NumbersofCommentsReceived

Table of Contents


iii January 2017Project No. 16.015

Appendices A NoticeofPreparationB NoticeofPreparationMailingListC NewspaperNoticesD PreRegulationWorkshopSurveyE MCCPFrequentlyAskedQuestionsF MCCPFactSheetSummaryG SummaryofStatuteandRegulatoryGoalsH CommentFormsI WorkshopPowerPointPresentationJ ScopingMeetingPostersK ScopingMeetingAttendeeSignInSheetsL TranscriptsReceivedduringScopingMeetingsM CommentCardsReceivedduringScopingMeetingsN MaterialsProvidedduringScopingMeetingsO EmailedCommentsReceivedduringScopingPeriod

Table of Contents


iv January 2017Project No. 16.015

Acronyms and Abbreviations Act Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act

CDFA California Department of Food and Agriculture

CEQA California Environmental Quality Act

EIR environmental impact report

GHG greenhouse gas

NOA notice of availability

NOP notice of preparation

PEIR program environmental impact report

MCCP Medical Cannabis Cultivation Program (also Program, Proposed Program)


ES-1 January 2017Project No. 16.015

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

OverviewThis Scoping Report summarizes the comments and questions raised during the publicscopingperiodforthepreparationofaprogramenvironmentalimpactreport(PEIR)bytheCaliforniaDepartmentofFoodandAgriculture(CDFA)fortheMedicalCannabisCultivationProgram (MCCP, Program, or Proposed Program). The scoping period during whichinterested parties were invited to comment on the environmental issues and concernsregardingtheProgrambeganonSeptember1,2016,andendedonSeptember30,2016.ThisScopingReportincludes:

asummaryofthepublicscopingprocess, asummaryofkeyissuesidentifiedduringthescopingperiod,and adescriptionoffuturestepstobetakenintherulemakingandenvironmentalreview

process.

SummaryoftheScopingProcessANoticeofPreparation(NOP)wasdistributedinvitingthepublictooffercommentsduringthe30dayscopingperiod.Atotalof321writtencommentswerereceived.Inaddition,eightpublicworkshopswereheldthroughoutCalifornia.Thepublicwasnotifiedof these workshops through CDFAs listserv, publication of notices in nine newspapersthroughoutthestate,andothermeans.Approximately968individualsattendedthescopingworkshops. Theworkshops included a number of topical stations,with staff available toengageindiscussionandanswerquestions.Ancillarymaterialswereprovided,andacourtreporterwasavailabletoreceivecomments.Fortysevenoralcommentswereprovidedattheworkshops.

SummaryofCommentsReceivedCommentsweregenerallysortedintooneofthreecategoriesbasedontheirrelevanceto(1)theproposedProgramregulations,(2)theProgramsProgramEnvironmentalImpactReport(the PEIR), or (3) issues outside of the scope of the PEIR. The following text provides asummaryofthecomments.Chapter3ofthisScopingReportprovidesadditionaldetailsonthecommentsreceived.

Executive Summary



CommentsontheProposedProgramRegulation

As part of the scoping process, CDFA requested feedback on seven goals to informdevelopmentoftheProgramregulations.Thesevenregulatorygoalswereasfollows:

RegulatoryGoal1:DefineTermsUsedinCannabisCultivation. RegulatoryGoal2:DefinetheApplicationProcessandRequirementsforLicensing. RegulatoryGoal3: IdentifytheCultivatorLicenseTypesbyLightSourceandSite

Size; Clarify Allowable License Combinations; Outline Renewal Process and SetLicensingFees.

Regulatory Goal 4: Specify Requirements to Mitigate Environmental Health andPublicSafetyIssues.

RegulatoryGoal5:OutlineCultivatorResponsibilitiesforComplianceInspection. RegulatoryGoal6:SpecifyTrackandTraceRequirements. RegulatoryGoal7:StateLicenseViolationsandAppropriatePenalties.

Responsestothesegoalsandadditionalcommentsrelatedtotheregulationsaresummarizedbelow. The comment subcategories related to CDFAs Proposed Program regulationsincludedregulatorygoalresponses(RegulatoryGoalsNos.1through7),licensetypessought,type3limits,nurseries,inspectionsandrecords,trackandtrace,andother.

ResponsestoRegulatoryGoal1provideddefinitionsforcannabiscultivationterms(canopy,flowering,immature,mixedlightcultivation,premises,andpropagation).

ResponsestoRegulatoryGoal2indicateapreferenceforonlinecultivationlicenseapplications(butalsotheavailabilityofpaperapplications);notbanningweaponsorfirearmsatcultivationsites;and,generally,planstoapplyforthreeorfewerlicenses.

Responses toRegulatory Goal 3 are diverse and include responses to site arearestrictions, lighting requirements for mixedlight, limiting Type 3 licenses, andestimatingthenumberofappliedforlicensedcultivationsitesbyoneperson.

Responses to Regulatory Goal 4 relate to the following key requirements forenvironmentalhealthandsafetymitigationmeasures:requireUSDAfarmspraylogsfor pesticides and odor control for indoor facilities; allow organic chemicals ortargetedpesticides; require optimalwatering,water and soil recycling, and greenwaste; use commonmethods of security; and distribute clones/juvenile plants tocultivators,dispensaries,membersofcollective,orsolelytoadistributor.

ResponsestoRegulatoryGoal5recommendestablishingrequirementsforrecordcontentandstoragedurationforbusinessrelateddocuments,materialrecords,andenhancedemployeerelatedrecords.

ResponsestoRegulatoryGoal6includeavarietyofsuggestionsfortrackandtracemethods,thoughthemostpopularwastotrackaproducedproductbybatchnumberandpurchaseorderfromthetimetheplantisaseedorcloneandthroughoutitslifestagesallthewaythroughdistribution.

Executive Summary



ResponsestoRegulatoryGoal7 focusonhandlingenforcement inanexpeditiousmanner,anddefiningminorandseriousviolationsmoreclearly.

License types sought concerns are generally associated with license quantitylimitations, costs of cultivation licensing and applications, manufacturing anddispensary license requirements, cultivation area limits, cottage licenses, andmethodstodistinguishlicensetypesfromoneanother.

InputonType3limitsislimitedtotwocommentsrecommendinglimitsforprimarilyoutdoorgrowsbasedontheirwatershedrelatedeffects,andapplyinglimitsonlytocultivation operations proposed after the implementation date for CDFAs MCCPlicensingprogram.

Nurseryrelated comments express concerns about pests, facility cleanliness,nursery stock licensingand label requirements, licensing costs, scaleand spaceofnurseries, distributor and dispensary roles, and consistency for nurseryrelatedtermsanddefinitions.

Inspectionsandrecordsrelatedcommentsidentifyconcernsassociatedwithcoststolocalandcountydepartments;uniqueidentifierdatabaseaccessforlocalagencies;unannouncedand/orlawenforcementescortedinspections;quantityofinspectionsper year; product damage or pest infestation from site or cannabis materialinspections; provision of a grace period to address violations; and specificrecommendationsforrecordcontent.

Thetrackandtracerelatedregulationsproducednumerousuniquecomments.Ingeneral, the commentsprovidedaddress recommendationsor concerns related tocertaintrack/tracetechnologiesandensuringthetechnologywascompatiblewithavariety of hardware and software systems; data encryption; tracking individualplants or particular plant stages/sizes; using agricultural produce traceabilitymethods; tracking cannabis products through all stages of cultivation; trackingcannabisweights;providingelectronictracking;allowinglawenforcementorthirdparties uniform access to the tracking information; requiring open standard;protecting personal patient information; tracing products back to the respectivecannabissources;trackingstagedflowerharvests;andadministrativemanagementneedsandcostsofthetrackandtraceprogram.

Othercommentsreceivedthatarerelatedtoregulationsincludethefollowing: Protection of federally granted certified organic farmers from cannabis

cultivation; Concernsregardingthebackgroundofcultivators,theirbusinesses,and/ortheir

funding mechanisms (past felonies, live outofstate most of year, foreigncountriescontrollingcannabislandorwaterusage,largecorporations);

Applicabilityofregulationstoagriculturalmarketingcooperatives; Providing a regulated marketplace for growers to comply with cultivation

regulations; Incentivizingorganicfarmingbycannabisgrowers;

Executive Summary



Requiringastatecultivationlicensepriortoconstructionofcannabiscultivationfacilities;

Allowingforonsiteconsumption/sales(i.e.,farmtours,bed&breakfast,events); Logisticsofstorageofcannabisproductsfollowingtestingandtimingoftransport

todispensary; Mitigating violence from cannabis cultivation, addressing illegal activities and

blackmarketasbestaspossible; GeneralconcernontimingofMCCPlicensingprogram; Cannabisproductpricingduetooverregulation; Quickerapplicationprocess; Equal opportunity concerns and priority recommendations for variety of

cultivatorsrelatedtosmallbusinesses,racialimbalanceincultivationindustry,certified organic farms, cultivators that have alreadymet local and statewiderequirements,existingcultivationoperations);and

Prohibitingcannabiscultivationuntil215cardprogramisrevised.

CommentsRelevanttotheEnvironmentalReview

ThefollowingisasummaryofcommentsreceivedthatpertaintoEIRcommentcategoriesrelevanttotheProposedProgramandpreparationofthedraftPEIR.

General cultivationpractices formedical cannabiswere discussed in numerousdistinct comments. These comments include recommendations or concernsregardingdemandandsupply,cultivationtechniquesandrestrictions,andgeneralprogramrelatedrecommendations. Demand and supply comments include determining the number of qualified

California medical cannabis patients, their consumption methods (medicalproducts),andtypicalcannabisamountconsumed;theamountofplantmaterial(canopyarea)requiredfortheseproducts;generalcannabisproductionandsaleregulation;andtheavailabilityoffundingmechanismsforcultivators.

Cultivation techniquerelated comments include an organic certificationprogram;noxiousweed speciesprevention; amountof light exposure foreachcannabiscultivationstage;alternativefarmingtechniques;micropropagationandmanaging propagation materials; preference for outdoor cultivation; allowingcultivatorstosortcannabismaterial intorawmaterials;pesticideandnutrientusage, storage, and disposal; proper equipment maintenance; and zero wasteindoorcultivationfacilities.

CommentsrelatedtoCDFAsprogramandensuringpropercomplianceincludedevelopingacultivationchecklist tool forusebyCDFAandothers;preventingillegal growing and sale of cannabis; definingmixedlight cultivation; allowingparticipation in CDFA groups/panels; implementing chemical or carbonized

Executive Summary



mechanismbased standards for cultivation facilities; cannabis extractionmethods;conversiontoindustrialhempbycurrentcannabisfarmers.

Aestheticsrelatedcommentsprimarilyrelatetoimpactsondayandnighttimescenicviews or scenic resources from cannabis cultivation operations equipment, landclearing,lightpollution,orthecannabisgrowerstemporarylivingaccommodations.Additionalconcernsrelatedtoimpactsoncoastalviewshedsandminimizingsecurityissuesthroughuseofvisualbarriersandlighting.

Agriculture and forestry comments include concerns with land clearing orconversionof farmland,agricultural,orTimberProductionZoneareastocannabiscultivation; compatibility between cannabis cultivation operations and othersurroundingagriculturalareas;localzoningorWilliamsonActcontracts;spreadofpestsanddiseases;regulation/enforcementconcerns;adesiretolimitgrowsitestopreviously disturbed agriculturezoned areas; and forest fragmentation andcompliancewithForestPracticeAct.

Airqualityandodorrelatedcommentsgenerallyrelatetogrowercompliancewithlocal, state, and federal air quality laws; ventilation systems and airbornecontaminants; and generating air quality impacts from cultivation transportationoperations,dustfromclearedlands,useofdieselfueledequipment,andplannedoraccidentalfiresorburningthatresultinemissions.

Biologicalresourcesrelatedcommentsandconcerns includegeneral compliancewith existing laws and regulations, particularly related to the protection ofendangeredandnativespeciesandtheirhabitats;appropriatebiologicalmitigationand monitoring measures; the effects of hazardous chemicals on native species;impactsonaquatichabitatsandnaturalaquifers;prohibitingcultivationoperationsinTimberProductionZonesandintimberland/woodlandtoavoidimpactsonnativewildlife habitat; harmful effects of light pollution on wildlife migration patterns;foreignsoilsandcorrespondingpotentialpathogens;wildfirerisk;soildegradation;noxiousweedspecies;limitingnumberofcultivationsites;useofprotectivesuitstominimize pest spreading; speciesspecific concerns (Pacific fisher, marbledmurrelet); genetic modification; wastewater and chemical dumping; and fishscreeningandpassageatwaterdiversions.

Culturalandtribalculturalresourcescommentsprimarilyrelatetolandgradingand land clearing activities and potential effects on archeological or historicresources;considerationoftribalcommunityconcerns;discoveryofhumanremainsor tribal burial ground sites; and proper mitigation for any impacts that couldadverselyaffectculturalresources.

Geology and seismicityrelated comments include concerns associated witherosion,sedimentation,disposalofforeignsoils,contaminationofsoilorwaterfromimproperstorage, soildegradation, and theproperusage, storage,anddisposalofnutrients.Othercommentsincluderecommendingageotechnicalservicesreportforcultivationsites,andimplementingmorestringentregulationsandenforcementtoprotectagainsteffectsoflandterracing.

Energyuseandgreenhousegas(GHG)emissionsconcernsincludeGHGandhighenergy use associatedwith indoor cultivation sites; emissions from long distance

Executive Summary



traveltocultivationsites;directandindirectimpactsofGHGemissionsatcultivationsites overall; consistency with plans, policies, regulations that address GHGemissions;potentialemissionsreducingscenariosoralternatives;usageanddisposalofappliancessuchasgenerators,butanecanisters,andpropane;andthepromotionofenergyefficientpracticesandappliances.Recommendations forenergyuseandGHG emissions include implementing carbon taxes; initiating a credit system toreward energyreducing cultivation operations; preparing a systematic andcomprehensivediscussionofclimatechangeimpactscausedbycannabiscultivation;requiringcannabisoperationstocalculatebaselinecarbonfootprintanddevelopaplan to minimize it over time; conducting an energy audit; requiring renewableenergysources;maximizingenergyusageduringoffpeakhours;penalizingagainstunmitigatedGHGemissions;developingastatewidecertificationprogram;andnotrestrictinglighting.

Hazards, hazardous materials, and human healthrelated comments expressconcerns associatedwith the spread of pests and diseases; impacts to crops andlivestock; use, transportation, and storage of hazardous materials and protectingagainst the spillage/runoff/drainageof these substances; adequateevaluationandregulation of potential hazards on/near cultivation sites; potential healthramifications from noxious odors and fumes; increased wildfire risk; propersanitation practices; emergency vehicles or evacuations; safety measures forstructures andworkers; increased crime/loss of safety; lightpollution impacts onhumanhealth; equipmentmaintenance; recallof cannabisproductsdue tohumanhealththreats/consequences;andinformingapplicantsofchemicalsthatmay/maynotbeusedonacultivationsite.

Hydrology and water qualityrelated comments relate to including applicableprovisionsofthePorterCologneWaterQualityControlActintheMCCPregulations,and compliance with federal and state water regulations, including adopted bestmanagementpractices.Thecommentsexpressconcernsregardingpotentialsurfacewater andgroundwater supply andquality impactsof cannabis cultivationdue tocannabis water use, cultivation site placement/locations, nutrient/pesticideapplication in an irrigation system, improper handling/storage of hazardousmaterials,plantingmedium,obstructingnaturalwaterflows,improperwastewaterdisposal,wildfireimpacts, importingwaterviawatertrucksfromunmeteredtownhydrants, and erosion and runoff. Reporting/trackingrelated requirementssuggested in the comments include informationonwater storageanduse; linkingreporting across state agencies; welldrilling and irrigation records; specificprovisions for bulk water haulers; analyzing water diversion rates and periods;proceduresfordrought/forcedwaterrestrictions;periodicsystemwidereview;andleakdetectionassessment.Othercommentsprovidespecificwatersavingtechniquesortechnologies.

Land use and planning comments include concerns associated with housingshortages, improper planning and construction practices, increased coastaldevelopment,establishingpropersetbacksfromsensitivereceptorsandhabitats,notallowing cultivation on public lands, land use violations, proper transportationroutes/emergency access for cultivation sites, physical division of establishedcommunities, and numerous recommendations related to the specific MCCPcultivationlicenseallowancesandrestrictions,includingsquarefootage.

Executive Summary



NoiserelatedcommentsincludeasuggestiontousenoisecomplaintsasasignificantimpactundertheCEQAchecklist,properstudyofvaryingnoiselevels,excessnoiseexposure,andtrafficand/ormechanicalequipmentnoiseatcultivationsites.

Population and housing concerns are associated with population growth incommunities as a result of cannabis cultivation, and housing shortages due toincreased real estate property values from real estate demand for cannabiscultivation.

Public servicesrelated comments expressed the following concerns andrecommendations:effectsonemergencyresponseandevacuation;restrictingtheuseofagriculturalwaterforcannabisirrigation;coststolocalandcountydepartmentsfor a potential need for increased law enforcement and public service agencies(police, fire); harassment and rights violations from law enforcement towardsgrowers;potentialincreasedcrime;requiredlawenforcementtrainingontheMCCPregulations;establishingnewsheriffsubstationsnearcultivationsites;andadequatesecurityatBoardofEqualizationdistrictoffices.

Recreation comments includeconcernsthatoutdoorcannabiswouldaffectpublicrecreational trails,andthe lossofrecreational facilities fromconversionofcoastallandtocultivationsites.

Transportationandtrafficrelatedconcernsincludeincreaseinuseofpublicandprivateroadstoandfromcultivationsites,illegalroadconstruction,andincreasesindevelopmentofparkinglots.

Utilities and service systems comments include concerns associated with solidwaste/trash accumulation and disposal near or within cultivation sites; use ofsubstandard septic systems; increased demands on utilities regarding electrical,mechanical, and plumbing infrastructure; and compliance with solid wasteregulations.Recommendedactions include studyingpossibleneed forwastewatersystemexpansions,implementingremedialprogramsthatprovidewastedisposalforcultivators,andpreparingawastemanagementplan.

AlternativesanalysisrelatedcommentsgenerallyrequestadetailedandcompleteconsiderationofalternativesinthePEIR,includingafocusonhowalternativeswouldcomply with applicable regulations, reduce cannabisrelated GHG emissions, andavoidorminimizewatershedandspecialstatusspeciesimpacts.

Cumulative considerations comments express concerns regarding cumulativeimpacts on biological resources, sensitive natural areas or natural resources, andwatersheds;indoorcultivationactivitiesandcorrespondingGHGemissions;growthand influx of people and economic impacts; impacts of other manufacturing,distribution,transportation,testing,anddispensarysites;andtheeffectsofdelayedenforcement.

CommentsontheoverallCEQAprocessforthePEIRincludeappreciationforthescoping meetings and the opportunity for the public to provide comment. Somecommentsdidnot favor the scopingmeeting formator theNOP.Other commentswere submitted regarding administrative and technical questions concerning thescopingmeetings.

Executive Summary



OtherCommentsOutsidetheScopeofthePEIR

In addition to commentsdirectly related to the regulations and thePEIR topics, commentsweresubmittedthatrelatedtotopicsthatarepotentiallyoutsideofCDFAsjurisdictionand/orarebroadercannabisrelatedsocialoreconomictopics.Thesearesummarizedasfollows:

concernsaboutpotentialincreasedcannabisdemand, offersofassistance indeveloping theregulationsandrequests tomeetwithCDFA

staff, requeststoprovidethepublicwithacompiledlistoflocalgovernmentagencies,and general comments indicating support or opposition towards the MCCP and

legalizationofcannabisasawhole.

NextSteps

DevelopmentofRegulations

Comments received in the scoping process that relate to the scope and content of theregulationswillbeusedtoinformthedevelopmentoftheMCCP.CDFAwillreviewcomments,questions,andsolicitedfeedbackpertainingtotheProgramsregulatorygoals;andconsiderthebestwaystoimplementtherequirementsoftheMedicalCannabisRegulationandSafetyAct.Itisanticipatedthatthefollowingtopicswouldbeaddressedintheregulations:

definitions, applicationsforcultivationlicenses, licensing, cultivatorrequirements, trackandtracerequirements, inspections,and enforcement.

DevelopmentofDraftPEIR

CommentsthatrelatetothescopeandcontentoftheCEQAanalysiswillbeusedtoinformtheanalysiscontainedinthedraftPEIR.ThedraftPEIRisanticipatedtobeavailableforpublicreviewandcommentinthesummerof2017.

OngoingOutreach

Outreachwilloccur through theProgramswebpageandmailings. InterestedpartieswhowanttoreceiveautomaticProgramupdatesviaemailcansignupatfortheMCCPlistservat

Executive Summary



https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/subscriptions/?cdfa_list_isd_medical_cannabis. Those withquestions are encouraged to send an email to the following address:[email protected];orcancall(916)2630801.QuestionscanalsobemaileddirectlytoRachelleKennedy,SeniorEnvironmentalScientist,atthefollowingaddress:

CaliforniaDepartmentofFoodandAgricultureAttn:RachelleKennedyMedicalCannabisCultivationProgramComments1220NStreet,Suite400Sacramento,CA95814

ProgramWebsiteUpdates

TheMCCPPEIRwebsite(https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/is/mccp/)willbeavailabletothepublicthroughout the CEQA process. The website will be updated for the public to review asadditionalinformationbecomesavailableabouttheProgramortheCEQAprocess.Thiswillincludenoticeregardingcirculationofdraftregulations,thedraftPEIR,andnotificationofpubliccommentperiodsforthesedocuments.

OtherOpportunitiesforPublicInvolvementintheDraftRegulations

Thepublicwillhave theopportunity tosubmit commentsondraft regulations.CDFAwillannouncetheavailabilityofdraftregulationsandthecommentperiodthroughits listservandothermeans.Thedraft regulationswillbemadeavailable fordownload inelectronicformatonthewebsite,and, to theextent feasible,asahardcopyuponwrittenrequest toCDFA.Interestedindividuals,agencies,andorganizationswillbeabletosubmitcommentsthroughout thecommentperiod,eitheronlineat theProgramPEIRwebsiteorbymailingcommentstoCDFA,asdirected.

OtherOpportunitiesforPublicInvolvementinthePEIR

ThepublicwillhavetheopportunitytosubmitcommentsduringthepublicreviewperiodforthedraftPEIR,whichwillbeforaperiodofatleast45days.ThiscommentperiodwillbeginwithcirculationofthedraftPEIR.CDFAwillannouncetheavailabilityofthedraftPEIRandcommentperiodbyissuingapublicNoticeofAvailability(NOA)totheStateClearinghouse,the58Californiacountyclerks,responsibleandtrusteeagencies,agencieswithjurisdictionbylaw,andotherinterestedindividualsandagencieswhohavejoinedtheProgramlistservorotherwiserequestednotice(viastandardmailand/oremail).CDFAwillalsoposttheNOAontheProgramPEIRwebsiteandissuenewspaperannouncementsasappropriate.ThedraftPEIRwillbemadeavailablefordownloadinelectronicformatonthewebsite,atavarietyoflibrariesthroughoutthestate,and,totheextentfeasible,asahardcopyuponwrittenrequesttoCDFA.Interestedindividuals,agenciesandorganizationswillbeabletosubmitcommentsthroughoutthecommentperiod,eitheronlineattheProgramPEIRwebsiteorbyemailingormailingcommentstoCDFA,asdirectedintheNOA.During the public review period CDFA also will conduct public workshops throughoutCaliforniaataccessiblelocations,similartothoseconductedduringthescopingperiod.


1-1 January 2017Project No. 16.015

Chapter1INTRODUCTION

BackgroundInlate2015,theStateLegislaturepassed,andGovernorBrownsignedintolaw,theMedicalCannabisRegulationandSafetyAct(Act).ThisAct,initiallyconsistingofthreeseparatebills(AssemblyBills243and266,andSenateBill643)andsubsequentlyamended(e.g.,AssemblyBills2516,1575,and21),outlinesanewstructureforregulationandenforcementofmedicalcannabis production and use in California. The Act addresses issues such as cultivation,manufactureofcannabisproducts,qualitycontrolandinspection,distribution,dispensaries,andprescriptionsforpatients.TheActestablishesnewlicensingproceduresforvariousaspectsoftheproductionprocessand identifies a number of state agency responsibilities. The Act includes tasking theCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) with licensing medical cannabiscultivationandestablishingatrackandtracesystem.Thetrackandtracesysteminvolvesdevelopmentofauniqueidentifierforeachplant,areportingsystem,fees,anddocumentingthetransportpathofplantsfromcultivationtodistributionasamedicinalcannabisproduct.In compliancewith theActs requirements, CDFA is developing regulations to establish alicensingprogramformedicalcannabiscultivationandtoestablishatrackandtracesystem.These are collectively referred to as the Medical Cannabis Cultivation Program (MCCP,Program,orProposedProgram).CDFAispreparingaprogramenvironmentalimpactreport(PEIR)toprovidethepublic,responsibleagencies,trusteeagencies,andpermittingagencieswithinformationaboutthepotentialenvironmentaleffectsassociatedwiththeadoptionandimplementation of these statewide regulations. The PEIR will be prepared by CDFA inaccordancewiththeprovisionsoftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andtheStateCEQAGuidelines.CDFAwill be the leadagencypursuant toCEQAandwill considerCEQArelated comments from responsible and trustee agencies, property owners, andinterested persons and parties regarding the scope and content of the environmentalinformationtobeincludedinthePEIR.

OverviewThis Scoping Report summarizes the comments and questions raised during the publicscopingperiodforthepreparationofaPEIRbytheCDFAfortheMCCP.Inaddition,thisreportsummarizes comments regardingMCCP regulations,whichwere also solicitedduring thescopingprocess,notallofwhicharedirectlyrelatedtotheCEQAprocessorthePEIRsscopeandcontent.Scopingistheprocessconductedtodeterminethecoverage,focus,andcontentofthePEIRas prescribed by CEQA. Scoping helps to identify the range of actions, alternatives,environmental effects, and mitigation measures for indepth analysis in the PEIR. This

Chapter 1. Introduction



processalsohelpstoselectmethodsofassessmentandtoeliminatefromdetailedstudythoseissuesthatarenotrelevanttotheprojectorrequiredunderCEQA.Inaddition,scopingisaneffectivewaytoidentifyandconsolidatetheconcernsofanyinterestedparties,whichmayincludeprojectproponentsandopponents,andinterestedfederal,state,andlocalagencies,amongothers.ThescopingprocessforthePEIRisdescribedinmoredetailinChapter2ofthisScopingReport.As part of the scoping process, CDFA requested feedback on seven goals to informdevelopmentoftheProgramregulations.Thesevenregulatorygoalswereasfollows:

RegulatoryGoal1:DefineTermsUsedinCannabisCultivation. RegulatoryGoal2:DefinetheApplicationProcessandRequirementsforLicensing. RegulatoryGoal3: IdentifytheCultivatorLicenseTypesbyLightSourceandSite

Size; Clarify Allowable License Combinations; Outline Renewal Process and SetLicensingFees.

Regulatory Goal 4: Specify Requirements to Mitigate Environmental Health andPublicSafetyIssues.

RegulatoryGoal5:OutlineCultivatorResponsibilitiesforComplianceInspection. RegulatoryGoal6:SpecifyTrackandTraceRequirements. RegulatoryGoal7:StateLicenseViolationsandAppropriatePenalties.

Inaddition,CDFArequestedfeedbackondefiningandanalyzing10licensetypesformedicalcannabiscultivation.Theselicensetypes,asdefinedduringthescopingprocess,are:

Type1,orspecialtyoutdoor,foroutdoorcultivationusingnoartificiallightingoflessthanorequalto5,000squarefeetoftotalcanopysizeononepremisesorupto50matureplantsonnoncontiguousplots.

Type 1A, or specialty indoor, for indoor cultivation using exclusively artificiallightingoflessthanorequalto5,000squarefeetoftotalcanopysizeononepremises.

Type1B,orspecialtymixedlight,forcultivationusingacombinationofnaturalandsupplemental artificial lighting, at amaximum threshold to be determined by theDepartment,of less thanorequal to5,000square feetof totalcanopysizeononepremises.

Type2,orsmalloutdoor,foroutdoorcultivationusingnoartificiallightingbetween5,001and10,000squarefeetinclusiveoftotalcanopysizeononepremises.

Type2A,orsmallindoor,forindoorcultivationusingexclusivelyartificiallightingof between 5,001 and 10,000 square feet inclusive of total canopy size on onepremises.

Type2B,orsmallmixedlight,forcultivationusingacombinationofnaturalandsupplemental artificial lighting, at amaximum threshold to be determined by theDepartment,between5,001and10,000squarefeetinclusiveoftotalcanopysizeononepremises.

Chapter 1. Introduction



Type3,oroutdoor,foroutdoorcultivationusingnoartificiallightingoffrom10,001squarefeetto1acreinclusiveoftotalcanopysizeononepremises.TheDepartmentshalllimitthenumberoflicensesallowedofthistype.

Type3A, or indoor, for indoor cultivation using exclusively artificial lighting ofbetween10,001and22,000squarefeetinclusiveoftotalcanopysizeononepremises.TheDepartmentshalllimitthenumberoflicensesallowedofthistype.

Type 3B, or mixedlight, for cultivation using a combination of natural andsupplemental artificial lighting, at amaximum threshold to be determined by theDepartment,ofbetween10,001and22,000squarefeetinclusiveoftotalcanopysizeononepremises.TheDepartmentshalllimitthenumberoflicensesallowedofthistype.

Type4,ornursery,forcultivationofmedicalcannabissolelyasanursery.Type4licenseesmaytransportliveplants.

TheintendeduseofthisScopingReportistoassistCDFAwithdevelopmentofregulations,inform the public regarding key issues that have been identified, and incorporate CEQArelated comments into the PEIRs administrative record. As such, this Scoping Reportincludes:

asummaryofthepublicscopingprocess, asummaryofkeyissuesidentifiedduringthescopingperiod,and adescriptionoffuturestepstobetakenintheenvironmentalreviewprocess.



Chapter2CEQASCOPINGPROCESS

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines provide guidance for thescopingprocess.Scopinghasthefollowinggeneralobjectives:1. toidentifytheconcernsoftheaffectedpublicandagencies;2. tohelpdefinetheissuesandalternativesthatwillbeexaminedindetailintheprogram

environmentalimpactreport(PEIR),whilesimultaneouslyassistingintheidentificationofissuesthatareoflittleornoconcern;and

3. toappropriatelyscaletheenvironmentalreviewprocessbyobtainingearlyfeedbackonthescopeandcontentofthePEIR.

The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) is committed to a planningprocessthatincludesstrongpublicinvolvement.Theprocesswillbebasedonsoundscience,andbeopenandtransparent.

NoticeofPreparationCEQArequiresformalpublicannouncementoftheintenttoprepareanenvironmentalimpactreportforaproposedproject.IncompliancewiththeStateCEQAGuidelines(14,CaliforniaCode of Regulations, Section 15082), CDFA issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) onSeptember1,2016(seeAppendixA).TheNOPpresentedgeneralbackgroundinformationontheProgram,thescopingprocess,theenvironmentalusestobeaddressedinthePEIR,andtheanticipatedusesofthePEIR.The NOP invited the public to offer comments and attend workshops during the 30dayscopingperiodSeptember1 throughSeptember30,2016.Somecommentswerereceivedafterthecloseofthescopingperiod;thesecommentswerestillconsideredindevelopingthisScopingReport.The NOPwasmailed to each of the 58 California county clerks, responsible and trusteeagencies,agencieswithjurisdictionbylaw,aswellasotherinterestedindividuals,agenciesand organizations. The NOP mailing list and related Program contact information areincludedinAppendixB.

PublicOutreachThisscopingworkshopinformationwaspublishedinEurekaTimesStandard,ReddingRecordSearchlight,TheSacramentoBee,OaklandTribune,SanLuisObispoTribune,TheFresnoBee,Los Angeles Times, Riverside Press Enterprise, and CDFAs website(www.cdfa.ca.gov/is/mccp). Affidavits certifying publication of newspaper notices are

Chapter 2. CEQA Scoping Process



includedinAppendixC.Table1liststheNOPpublicationdateandcountyofcoverageforeachnewspaper.Table. 1. Newspaper Notices

Newspaper County Date Published Eureka Times Standard Humboldt September 1, 2016Redding Record Searchlight Shasta September 1, 2016Sacramento Bee Sacramento September 1, 2016San Francisco Chronicle San Francisco September 1, 2016San Luis Obispo Tribune San Luis Obispo September 1, 2016Fresno Bee Fresno September 1, 2016Los Angeles Times Los Angeles September 1, 2016Riverside Press Enterprise Riverside September 1, 2016

Inaddition,thescopinginformationwasprovidedtothefollowingnewsmediaoutletsasapublicserviceannouncementtheweekpriorand/ortheweekoftheworkshop.Table 2. Public Service Announcements

Newspaper County Eureka KMUD Humboldt Oakland KQED Alameda San Luis Obispo KVEC San Luis Obispo Coalinga KTEA Fresno Desert Hot Springs KNWQ Riverside

PublicWorkshopsTo provide the public and regulatory agencieswith an opportunity to ask questions andprovidecommentsonthescopeofthePEIR,eightpublicscopingworkshopswereheldduringtheNOPreviewperiod.CDFAconductedtheseworkshopsatdifferentlocationsthroughoutthestatebecauseoftheProgramsstandingasaprojectofstatewide,regional,orareawidesignificance.Theworkshopswereheldtosolicitinputfromthepublicandinterestedpublicagenciesregardingthenatureandscopeofenvironmental impactstobeaddressed inthedraftPEIR.Approximately968individualsattendedtheworkshops.Thescopingworkshopdates,times,andlocationswereasfollows:

September13,2016,4p.m.SacramentoConventionCenter(Room202)1400JStreet,Room202Sacramento,CA95814

September21,2016,47p.m.CourtyardbyMarriott(GrandBallroom)1605CalleJoaquinSanLuisObispo,CA93405

September14,2016,47p.m.RedLionHotel(SierraRoom)1830HilltopDriveRedding,CA96002

September22,2016,47p.m.HarrisRanch24505WestDorrisAveueCoalinga,CA93210

September15,2016,47p.m.RedLionHotel(PacificRoom)19294thStreetEureka,CA95501

September27,2016,47p.m.PasadenaConventionCenter(BallroomF)300EastGreenStreetPasadena,CA91101




September20,2016,47p.m.OaklandMarriott1001BroadwayOakland,CA94607

September28,2016,47p.m.MiracleSpringsResortandSpa10625PalmDriveDesertHotSprings,CA92240

WorkshopFormat

Allworkshopsusedthesameformat,andinterestedpartieswereinvitedtoattendoneorallworkshops.Ateachworkshoplocation,CDFAstaffwelcomedattendees.Atthegreetingtable,guestswereaskedtosigninandweregivenabriefdescriptionoftheavailablehandouts,theopen workshop format, and the process for submitting comments. Handouts providedincludedcopiesoftheNOP(AppendixA);PreRegulationWorkshopSurvey(AppendixD);MedicalCannabisCultivationProgram(MCCP)FrequentlyAskedQuestions(AppendixE),MCCPFact Sheet Summary (AppendixF); and Summary of Statute andRegulatoryGoals(AppendixG).Commentforms(AppendixH)wereavailableforgueststouseinprovidingwrittencomments,eitherattheworkshoporatalaterdate.TheseitemswerealsoavailableasdownloadsontheCDFAMCCPwebsite.Theroomwasdivided into topical stations,eachofwhich includedseveralposterboards(AppendixJ)withinformationaboutvariousaspectsoftheMCCPandCEQAprocess.EachstationwasmannedbyCDFAand/orconsultantstafftoanswerquestionsandhelpdescribetheregulatoryandPEIRprocesses.Acourtreporterwasalsoavailableateachmeetingtotakeoralcomments.Additionally,a looping10minuteMicrosoftPowerPointpresentationwas available for viewing throughout the workshop (Appendix I). The PowerPointpresentationandposterswereavailableontheCDFAMCCPwebsite.

ParticipatingStaff

ThefollowingCDFArepresentativesandsupportingconsultantsparticipatedinoneormoreofthescopingworkshops:

DepartmentofFoodandAgriculture EnerconServices,Inc.

AmberMorrisCrystalDSouzaMicheleDiasLindsayRains

TomTrexlerJeffWarshauerMichaelSmith

HorizonWaterandEnvironment,LLC NicholasCommunicationsMichaelStevensonMeganGigliniJulieAllison

RebeccaNicholas

BlankinshipandAssociates,Inc. ArdeaConsulting

MikeBlankinship JoeSullivan




WorkshopAttendance

Ateachworkshop,attendeeswereaskedbutwerenotrequiredtosigninandprovidecontactinformation.CopiesofattendancesheetsareprovidedinAppendixK.

CommentsReceived

OralComments

Atotalof47individualsprovidedoralcommentsduringthepublicworkshops.

WrittenComments

Agencies, organizations, and individuals provided written responses to the NOP bysubmitting electronicmail (email) orhandwritten comment or speaker cardsduring thescopingperiod.Outofatotalof322writtencommentsreceived,298wereemails,20werecommentcards,andfourwerehandouts(Table3).Table 3. Numbers of Comments Received

Entity Type Emails Comment Cards Handouts State Agencies 8 0 0 Local and Regional Agencies 17 1 0 Native American Tribes and Affiliated Organizations

5 0 0

Organizations 25 2 1 Individuals/Landowners/Local Residents 243 17 3 Total 298 20 4

Near the conclusion of each workshop, CDFA staff reminded attendees that writtencommentswouldbeacceptedanytimeduringthescopingperiod.



Chapter3SUMMARYOFCOMMENTSRECEIVED

Allcommentsreceived inresponse to theNoticeofPreparation(NOP)willbeconsideredduringpreparationofthedraftprogramenvironmentalimpactreport(PEIR).Oralcommentsreceived during the scoping workshops were documented by a certified court reporter.Transcripts of these comments, alongwith comment cards and hard copy handouts andletters submitted during themeetings, are included inAppendixK. In addition to thesemeetings,atotalof298commentswerereceivedviaemailduringthescopingperiodandareincludedinAppendixO.Figure1providesageographicdepictionofthephysicallocationsofcommenters,asprovidedbycommenters.

ReviewofScopingCommentsReceivedToensurethataneutralandtransparentanalysisisusedtoreviewandcategorizeallpubliccommentsreceived,thisScopingReportincludescopiesoftheoriginaldocumentssubmitted(seeAppendicesL,M,N,andO).The issuespresented in thissectionarenot intendedtoreplicatethecommentsreceivedverbatim,butrathertoprovideasynopsisofthecommentsreceivedandcapturethegeneralviewsandopinionsofthecommenters.ThefollowingpagessummarizethecommentsreceivedandreportthemcategoricallyunderspecificcommentcategoriespertainingtotheMedicalCannabisCultivationProgram(MCCP,Program,orProposedProgram)regulationsandPEIR.Thesecategoriesarelistedbelow.CommentCategoriesRelevanttotheProposedProgramRegulations:

RegulatoryGoalResponses(RegulatoryGoalsNos.1through7)(pages34through311ofthisreport)

LicenseTypesSought(pages312through313) Type3LicenseLimits(page313) Nurseries(pages313through314) InspectionsandRecords(pages314through315) TrackandTrace(pages315through318) Other(pages318through320)

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

KERN

SAN BERNARDINO

RIVERSIDE

IMPERIALSAN DIEGO

LOS ANGELESVENTURA

ORANGE

Diamond Bar

RoughandReady

BerkeleySan Francisco

Arcata BlueLakeFrench Gulch

TrinityCounty

LincolnRocklinRoseville

Fair Oaks

INYO

SISKIYOU

FRESNO

LASSEN

MODOC

TULARE

SHASTA

MONO

TRINITY

TEHAMA

HUMBOLDT

PLUMAS

MENDOCINO

MONTEREY

BUTTE

LAKE

MADERAMERCED

KINGS

TUOLUMNE

GLENN

PLACER

SONOMAYOLO EL DORADO

NAPA

COLUSA

SANTA BARBARA

MARIPOSA

SIERRANEVADA

ALPINE

ALAMEDA

SAN LUISOBISPO

STANISLAUS

YUBA

SANBENITO

SOLANO

SANJOAQUIN

DELNORTE

SANTACLARA

MARINCALAVERAS

SUTTER

SACRA-MENTOAMADOR

CONTRACOSTA

SAN MATEO

SANTA CRUZ

SAN FRANCISCO

Chico

Ukiah

Irvine

Merced

Fresno

Eureka

Covelo

Ventura

Vallejo

Reedley

Gazelle

Cambria

Anaheim

Willits

Modesto

Salinas

Redding

Oakland

Fortuna Hyampom

Shandon

Carlsbad

Adelanto

Stockton

Monterey

RedcrestPetroliaHoneydew

San Jose

El Cajon

Martinez

Somerset

Kneeland

Templeton

San Diego

Hollister

Daly City

El Centro

Red Bluff

Santa Rosa

Santa Cruz

Sacramento

Hydesville

Anchor Bay

Fort Bragg

Chula Vista

Watsonville

Nevada City

Santa Maria

Palm Desert

Carpinteria

Bakersfield

Weaverville

ButteCounty

Walnut Creek

Rohnert Park

GrassValley

ShastaCounty

Moreno ValleyRancho Mirage

Newport Beach

McKinleyvilleJunctionCity

Mountain View

Desert Hot Springs

0 100 20050 MilesFigure 1Comments Received by Location

NEVADAOREGON

MEXICO

ARIZONA

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(Sonora

Arnold

Murphys

West Point

Angels Camp

Copperopolis

Valley Springs

Rail Road Flat

Mountain Ranch

CalaverasCounty

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

Long Beach

Malibu

Tarzana

Gardena

Sunland

Glendale

San Pedro

Los Angeles

Simi Valley

SantaMonica

San Fernando

BeverlyHillsWestlakeVillage

Notes: Of 369 total comments, 208 included oneor more type of location-based information (city, ZIPCode, or phone number);161 contained nolocation-based information.Comment origin locations were determined firstby city or ZIP Code. Where no city or ZIP Codewere provided, telephone area codes andprefixes were used.

!( 1!( 2!( 3!( 4!( 5!( 8!( 9!( 12!( 17

Count of Commentsby Location

See Calaveras County Inset

See Los Angeles Area Inset

Calaveras County Los Angeles Area

Out-of-State Comments:AZ (1), CO (3), FL (3), IL (1), MD (1),NJ (1), NV (2), OR (2), TX (1)

Chapter 3. Summary of Comments Received



CommentCategoriesRelevanttoProgramDescriptionDevelopmentandtheEnvironmentalReviewofResourceAreasinAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelines:

GeneralCultivationPractices(pages320through322) Aesthetics(pages322through313) AgricultureandForestry(pages322through323) AirQualityandOdor(pages323through324) BiologicalResources(pages324through326) CulturalResourcesandTribalCulturalResources(page327) GeologyandSeismicity(page327) EnergyUseandGreenhouseGasEmissions(pages327through329) Hazards,HazardousMaterials,andHumanHealth(pages329through330) HydrologyandWaterQuality(pages330through334) LandUseandPlanning(pages334through336) Noise(page336) PopulationandHousing(page336) PublicServices(page337) Recreation(page337) TransportationandTraffic(page338) UtilitiesandServiceSystems(page338) AlternativeAnalysis(page339) CumulativeConsiderations(page339) PEIRCEQAProcess(page340) Others(pages340through341)

The following briefly summarizes the major perspectives from review of all comments.Parenthesizednumbersnexttoeachsummarizedissuecorrespondtoindividualcommentletter codes, to aid in identifying the source(s) of each comment (see Appendices LthroughO).

CommentCategoriesRelevanttoProposedProgramRegulationsThefollowingcommentsreceivedpertaintoProposedProgramregulations.




RegulatoryGoalResponses(RegulatoryGoalNos.1through7)

Goal#1:DefineTermsUsedinCannabisCultivation.

Canopy

Shouldbedefinedastheaerialorbirdseyeviewofmatureplantcoverageexcludingaislesandrowsbetweenplants.Bydefinitionthecanopywouldbemeasuredbytheouteredgeoftheupperportionofthematureplant.(1)(11)(14)(15)(16)(22)(23)(23)(34)(40)(50)(61)(65)(68)(76)(77)(78)(80)(81)(89)(141)(148)(165)(169) (171) (176) (179) (180) (184) (192) (193) (199) (248) (267) (268) (272)(274)(275)(280)(368)

Should be defined as the square footage measurement of surfacemedium. Forexample,a2footby2footgrowbedwouldequal4squarefeetofcanopy.Thiscouldalsorefertotheexteriordimensionsofagreenhouseorcultivationarea.Concernsassociatedwithindividualplantcanopybeingtoovariabletomeasureeffectively.(2)(12)(24)(39)(41)(42)(44)(84)(114)(117)(129)(142)(144)(146)(148)(183)(246)(271)(333)

Shouldbedefinedasthetopthirdlayerofthefoliageofoneormoreplants.(56)Flowering

Associatedwiththeprocesswheretheplantbeginstobloomandproduceaflowerorharvestablebud.Indoorfloweringperiodsareoftentriggeredbyperiodsoflessthan12hoursoflightaday.(1)(3)(11)(12)(14)(15)(16)(24)(39)(40)(41)(42)(50) (56) (61) (65) (76) (78) (80) (81) (89) (114)(117)(129)(144)(146)(148)(169)(171)(176)(179)(180)(184)(192)(193)(248)(268)(275)(280)(368)

Thefinalstageofcultivationpriortoharvest.(2)(23) Recommendationtoincorporatethewordmatureintothedefinitionofflowering.

(34)Immature

Shouldbedefinedasthebeginningstagesofthegrowthcycleincludingsproutingandvegetativegrowth,upuntilrightbeforethefloweringstage.(1)(2)(5)(11)(12)(22)(23)(24)(34)(56)(76)(80)(81)(84)(89)(114)(117)(129)(144)(148)(169)(171)(176)(267)(268)(275)(333)(368)

Recommendationtoreplacethistermwithvegetative.(16)(34)(42)(129)(146)(184)

Forplantsgrownwithartificialormixedlight,associatedwithplantsgrownwith18ormorehoursoflight.(41)(78)

Shouldbedefinedasaplantlessthan8inchestallorlessthan3monthsold.(51)(77)(84)(180)(199)(274)




MixedLightCultivation

Associatedwithcultivationwithingreenhouseswheresyntheticlightisaddedinadditiontonaturallightduringperiodsoflowsuninordertoprolongtypicalgrowingseasons.Oftencharacterizedbyaretractableortransparentroofthatcanbecovered.(1)(2)(5)(11)(12)(15)(16)(22)(24)(34)(39)(40)(41)(50)(56)(61)(65)(66)(76) (77) (80) (81) (114)(117)(141)(144)(146)(165)(169)(179)(180)(184)(192)(248)(267)(268)(274)(275)(280)(333)

Associatedwithstartingthejuvenileplantsundergrowlightsbeforebeingmovedoutdoors.(42)(176)(183)

Recommendation to divide mixedlight into two tiers based on wattage persquarefootand/ornumberofharvestsperyear.(78)

Premises

Shouldbedefinedasthephysicallysegregatedportionofaparceldesignatedforcultivation.Thiscouldincludetheentireparcelorlimitedsectionsdependingontheuse.(2)(5)(11)(12)(14)(15)(16)(22)(23)(24)(40)(44)(51)(56)(76)(77)(78)(80)(81)(114)(129)(141)(148)(165)(169)(176)(192)(267)(280)(333)

Shouldbedefinedbytheparcelboundaryorpropertylineofthelicenseeoperatedbusiness.(41)(61)(65)(84)(89)(146)(171)(176)(180)(183)(184)(192)(199)(246)(274)(275)(368)

Propagation

Associatedwithstartingplantgrowtheitherfromseedorclone.(2)(16)(23)(42)(56) (61) (65) (76) (77) (78) (80) (81) (84) (114)(129)(146)(169)(171)(176)(180)(183)(192)(267)(274)(275)(333)(368)

Shouldbedefinedasthereproductionofaspecificplantstrainorcharacteristic.(11)(12)(15)(24)(41)(42)(148)(199)

Should be defined as the period 2 to 3months before planting, cloning, andtransplantingplantsintothegroundtoestablishahealthycrop.(14)

Shouldbedefinedasproducingonesownseedsorclones.(39)(40)(89)Other

Regulationsshoulddefinewholesaleandretailnurseries.(96)




Goal#2:DefinetheApplicationProcessandRequirementsforLicensing.

TheProgramisconsideringusinganonlineapplicationprocess,aswellasatraditionalpapermethod.Whichapplicationmethodwouldyouprefer?

Recommendationtouseanonlineapplicationasthemostefficient,costeffectivemethod,andpreferredmethod.(1)(2)(11)(12)(8)(15)(16)(24)(34)(39)(40)(41) (46) (50) (56) (61) (65) (72) (76) (77) (81) (82) (87) (88) (89) (114)(117)(141) (143) (144) (145) (146) (147) (148) (165) (168) (169) (179) (180) (182)(183) (186) (190) (192) (193) (195) (198) (246) (248) (267) (268) (272) (276)(280)(333)

Recommendationtouseapapermethodorhaveapaperapplicationaccessible.(14)(15) (16) (46) (50) (56) (61) (65) (76) (77) (142)(145)(148)(165)(182)(190)(194)(246)(267)(268)(273)(274)(280)(368)

Concernaboutthelackofaccessthatsomecultivatorshavetointernetandsuggestthatlocalagricultureofficesshouldbeabletoassistcultivatorswithcompletinganapplication.(12)(78)(87)(142)

TheProgram isconsideringaweaponsandfirearmbanatcultivationsitestoprotectStateenforcementstaff.Howwillthataffectyou?

Concernsoverabilitytoprotectselfandpropertyinremoteareaswithoutaccesstofirearmswhendealingwithwildpredatorsanddelayedlawenforcementresponsetimes.(1)(11)(14)(34)(41)(65)(78)(87)(117)(137)(141)(145)(146)(168)(169)(183)(190)(268)(271)(275)(280)(334)(339)(164)(312)

Recommendationtoallowlicensedsecurityguardstoprotectcultivationsitesintheeventofa firearmsban.(2)(11)(39)(49)(50)(76)(80)(175)(179)(180)(193)(271)(274)

Recommendation to implement aweaponsand firearmsban. (8) (15) (61) (72)(82)(88)(147)(182)(272)(276)(333)

Concernsoveraviolationof2ndamendmentrights.(16)(17)(24)(42)(63)(77)(89)(143)(148)(187)(248)(267)

Concernsover the inabilityofacultivator toproperlyprotecttheiroperations iffirearmswererestricted.(12)(17)(34)(80)(114)(144)(186)(192)(194)(195)(196)(199)(246)

Concernsassociatedwithfeelingunsafeifweaponsandfirearmsoncultivationsitesareprohibited.(70)(105)(136)(137)(164)(312)

Concernsassociatedwithfirearmsonlicensedcannabiscultivationsites.(98)(100)(147)(282)

Since some growers are conducting cannabis cultivation operations inside ofresidences, recommendation to establish a setback limit beyond homes wherefirearmsarenotallowed.(246)




Howmanyapplicationsdoyouanticipatesubmitting?

Planstosubmitthreeorfewerapplications.(1)(5)(14)(15)(24)(34)(39)(40)(50)(62)(65)(77)(81)(88)(114)(117)(144)(145)(146)(148)(165)(169)(183)(187)(193)(198)(271)(272)(273)(276)

Planningtosubmitupto10applications.(2)(34)(41)(56)(87)(195)(275)(333)

Goal#3:IdentifytheCultivatorsLicenseTypesbyLightSourceandSiteSize;ClarifyAllowableLicenseCombinations;OutlineRenewalProcessandSetLicensingFees.

Whatistheacreageyoufeelisreasonableforthecap?Howaboutforindoorandmixedlight?Howwillthisimpactyourbusinessmodel?

Concernsassociatedwitha4acrerestriction,ascorporationsareallowedtogrowandcompetewithsmallerfarmers.(1)(41)(129)

Recommendationtoallowforindividualparcellimitationsaslongascultivatorscanhavemultiplelicensesformultiplelocations.(11)(15)(16)(42)(61)

Recommendationthatoutdoorgrowsshouldhavelesssizerestrictionsthanmixedlightandindoorgrows.(12)(8)(17)(23)(39)(56)(171)(190)(192)(273)(368)

Recommendation to not finalize the site restrictions until a more accurateevaluationofconsumerdemandisdetermined.(24)(34)(51)(81)(180)(186)(267)

Recommendationto includeType4 licenses inthesame4acrelimitastheotherlicensetypes.(34)

Concern that certain countiesandcities (e.g.,Humboldt)havealreadypermittedcultivationplansinexcessof4acres.(34)

Concernthat4acresistoo largeandwouldpreferstricterrestrictions.(72)(88)(89)(114)(142)(145)(146)(165)(174)(190)(193)

Whendoesacultivatoralsoneedamanufacturinglicense?Arejoints,drysieving,andwaterconcentratingaformofmanufacturingorwithinthescopeofcultivation?

Recommendationtonotrequiremanufacturinglicensesforcannabisproductionfarmswhicharebynaturesuitedtoperformdrysievingforkieforshakeaswellasjointrollingtoselltoadispensary.(24)(34)(42)(61)(77)(78)(81)(89)(129)(143)(146)(180)(186)(190)(193)(196)(274)(333)

Recommendationtorequireamanufacturinglicensefortheuseofcarbondioxide,hydrocarbons,orotherchemicalsolventstoextractresin.(39)(72)(77)(78)(81)(142)(143)(192)(193)(274)

Concernthatanyactiontakentomodifyand/oraddmaterialstocultivatedproductmustperformqualitycontrolandberegulatedasmanufacturingandsubjecttonecessarylicense.(40)(114)(183)(267)(272)




Recommendationtorequireamanufacturinglicenseforanycultivatorthatwishestotrim,process,orinanywayaddvaluetotheirproduct.(50)(72)(174)(248)

All fees (application, licensing, penalties, etc.) should reflect the full cost ofmaintaining andproviding environmental protection,monitoring, and restoration.(46)(100)(136)(282)

Concernsassociatedwiththeimpactsofcannabistaxationandfeesongrowers,especiallysmallgrowers.(122)(236)(308)(323)(70)

Howmanyseparatelylicensedcultivationsiteswouldyouliketoapplyfor?

Theabilitytocultivate,manufacture,andtransportproductaremainfunctionsofourbusinessmodel.(1)

Planstorequestmultiplecultivatorlicenses.(15)(24)(42)(50)(114)(117)(141)(144)(145)(190)

Wouldrequestallormostlicensingtypes.(41)(56)Whatdoyouthinkisareasonableamountoflightingtobeusedandstillbeconsideredamixedlightcultivationsite?

Recommendation that a reasonable mixedlight grow operation is approximately40,000wattsor+/40lights.(1)

Recommendationtonotrestricttheuseofsupplemental lightingbutencourageorrequireuseofsolarandrenewableenergysourcesand/orefficientlightingsuchasLED.(11)(14)(275)

Concerns about being able to appropriately determine lighting limitations givenlocationaldifferencesandpersonalpreferencesincultivationstyle.(12)(24)(34)(39)(41)(89)

Recommendstohavethethresholdsetatapproximately35to50wattspersquarefoot.(16)(56)(88)(143)(145)(171)(186)

Recommendationtosetlimitationsonwhatissafeforthebuildingorstructuretohandle,inregardstofirehazards.(42)

Recommendationtoprohibitartificiallights.(65)TheProgram isrequired to limit thenumberofType3(largest license type) licensesissued.Whatmethoddoyouconsiderfairforestablishingtheselimits?

ConcernsthatType3licenseswouldbeunobtainabletosmalllocalfarmersandcommunitiesduetopriorconvictionsand/orlackoffinancialresourcesresultinginlargemonopolies.(1)(12)(42)

Recommendation to limit Type 3 licenses based on applicants experience inrunning largescale operations, proximity to populated area, security, andenvironmentalimpacts.(2)(15)(61)(81)(180)(333)




Recommendation to baseType 3 license distribution based onclimateand localregulations.(11)(39)(42)(56)(81)(141)(143)(144)(171)(192)(267)(272)

Concernsthat thesizeofType3 licensespromotes lowergradecannabiswithlimitedmedicinalbenefitandshouldbehighlyrestricted.(14)(88)(145)

Concerns that the limitation on Type 3 Licenses wouldnot allow cultivators toredeemlicensingandoperationcosts.(24)(34)(41)(44)(61)(76)(174)

RecommendationtoprohibitorrestrictType3licenseuntiltheconsumerdemandisbetterevaluated.(40)(114)(129)(193)

Goal#4:SpecifyRequirementstoMitigateEnvironmentalHealthandPublicSafetyIssues.

Howdoyoucurrentlyaddresspotentialenvironmentalimpactsatacultivationsite?

RecommendationtorequireUSDAfarmspraylogsforpesticidesandodorcontrolforindoorfacilities.(2)(333)

Recommendationtotreatthegrowingofcannabisjustlikeanyotherfarmedcrop,suchasgrapesforwineproduction.(24)

Doyouconducttargetedpesticideuse?

Recommendation to incorporate the use of organic chemicals and preventativemeasures,suchasneem,oliveoil,garlic,ladybugs,castilesoaptotreatmildewandpests.(14)(39)(56)(88)(89)(117)(165)(168)(169)(268)(272)(273)(368)

Recommendationtoallowtargetedpesticideusewhendeterminedtobenecessarytopreventthecontaminationofthefacilityorspreadofdisease/pests.(24)(40)(42)(50)(61)(77)(78)(81)(148)(267)

Doyouuseoptimalwateringtimes?Doyourecyclewaterand/orcultivationmaterials?

Recommendationtoestablishoptimalwateringtimesandrecyclingprogramforwaterandsoil.Primarymethodsforresponsiblewateringincludestheuseofdripirrigationsystems,mulching,watercatchment,andsoilamendments.(5)(11)(12)(15)(27)(34)(39)(40)(42)(50)(56)(61)(62)(65)(80)(114)(141)(143)(144)(168)(169)(179)(183)(199)(267)

Recommendationtorequiregreenwastefromthecultivationprocesstobeusedtoamendsoil.(24)(34)(39)(42)(56)(65)(77)(80)(88)(89)(114)(141)(143)(168)(183)(280)

How do you currently secure your cultivation site? Alarm system? Fencing? Securityguard?

Incorporatecommonmethodsofsecurity, includingfences,alarms,accesscodes,videosurveillance,dogs,lighting,andneighborhoodwatch.(1)(2)(5)(11)(15)(23)(24)(34)(39)(40)(41)(42)(50)(56)(61)(62)(65)(81)(87)(88)(89)(114)(117)




(141) (143) (144) (146) (165) (169) (171) (172) (179) (180) (190) (192) (199)(248)(272)(273)(280)(368)

Recommendationtorequireadwellingunitonsiteaswellasforthepropertytobesecurelyfenced.(16)(368)

Doyousellplantstoadispensaryforsaletopatients?Ordoyousellplantstocultivatorsforflowerproduction?Howmuchresearchanddevelopmentgoesonatanurserysite?Doyouregularlypropagatefromseed?

Distributesclonesandjuvenileplantstomembersofcollective.(14)(15)(61)(65)(117)(146)(173)(192)(274)

Distributes clones and juvenileplants tocultivatorsanddispensaries. (15) (39)(40)(56)(61)(78)(114)(142)(173)(192)(280)

Distributessolelytoadistributorandnottoretail.(24) Concern that seedpropagationmustoccuratanursey because the strains are

engineeredtoproducelimitedtonoseeds.(50)Goal#5:OutlineCultivatorResponsibilitiesforComplianceInspection.

Whatmeasuresdoyoucurrentlytaketomakeyoursitesafeforinspection?

Recommend open communication with regulators and notification prior toinspections.(5)(11)(12)(23)(24)(34)(40)(42)(146)(169)(275)

Whattypeofrecordsdoyoucurrentlyretain?

Concernsassociatedwiththelackofrecordkeepingatcultivationsites.(12)(65)(196)

Recommendationtorequiresellerspermitandpatientrecommendationstoberetainedonthepremises.(14)(34)

Recommendation to require businessrelated documents including: expensereports, time frame of activity, inspection reports, production weights, QA/QCreports,andotherdocumentsrelatedtothecultivationactivity.(15)(24)(40)(61)(88)(129)(144)(180)(192)(193)(268)

Recommendationforamandatory2yearfilingperiodforanydocumentsrelatedtocultivation.(16)

Recommendation to requirematerial records including water/feeding records,composttearecipes,fertilizers,pesticides,andfungicides.(39)(40)(41)(81)(129)(141)(142)(143)

Recommendationtorequireemployeetraining,tax,andsanitationrecords.(40)(42)(180)




Goal#6:SpecifyTrackandTraceRequirements

Recommendation to track produced product by batch number and purchaseorderfromthetimetheplantisaseedorcloneandthroughoutitslifestagesalltheway until distribution. (2) (11) (12) (15) (40) (61) (78) (142) (145) (171) (187)(192)(333)(358)

RecommendationtofollowandimplementthesamerequirementstheCaliforniaDepartmentofPublicHealthusestotrackproduce.(6)(129)

Recommendationthatplantcountshouldbetrackedatcloningorplanting.(14)(8)

Recommendationtoimplementariskbasedinspectionsystem(RBIS)thatworksby targeting businesses that are most likely to be noncomplaint with laws andregulations.(23)(84)

Recommendationtobarcode(QRCode)plantssotheycanbeeasilytrackedfromseedtoshelfbyregulator,cultivator,andbuyer.(24)(267)

Goal#7:StateLicenseViolationsandAppropriatePenalties

Recommendationthataviolationshouldbehandledinonemonth,30days,whichisadesiredtimeforanoncompliancehearingtobeheld.(1)(12)(50)(51)(62)(72)(76)(81)(114)(117)(143)(169)(179)(194)(273)

Recommendation that license appeals and similar offenses should preferably behandledwithin60to90days.(15)(40)(61)(144)(192)(272)(276)

Recommendation to revoke licenses in cases of complete disregard for properadherencetoprogram.(2)(16)(23)

Recommendationtoestablishascoringsystemofpenalties.(11) Recommendation to have inspectorworkwith licensee to immediately fix non

complianceissue.(24) Recommendationtodefineasminoroffensesincidentsbeyondcultivatorcontrol

or correctable violations such as reporting errors which could be immediatelyresolved.(6)(12)(8)(15)(23)(24)(40)(50)(51)(56)(61)(76)(78)(81)(84)(88)(143)(144)(169)(171)(268)(273)

Recommendation todefineseriousviolationswith irreversibleenvironmentalhazardsandpollution,mistreatmentofemployees,illegalactivitiessuchasillicitdrugsales,anddisruptingthelocalcommunity.(1)(2)(12)(15)(16)(23)(24)(50)(61)(76)(78)(81)(84)(88)(141)(142)(143)(144)(169)(171)(179)(268)(273)(333)

Recommendationtodefineseriousviolationswithintentionalsaleofproducttoanunauthorizedpurchaserand/ortheunrecordedsaleofcannabis.(40)




LicenseTypesSought

ClarifyanyproductionsizerequirementsorlimitationsonaType4licensesincethelawdoesnotprovideanyclarificationforthis.(96)

Concernsassociatedwiththeoveralllimitonthenumberofcultivationlicensesthatanyoneapplicantorparcelmayhold.(80)(232)(233)(265)(268)(308)(9)(32)(360)(44)(154)(174)(232)

Concernsassociatedwiththetotalarea/acreagethatanapplicantmayplaceundercultivation.(8)(9)(72)(154)(8)(72)(174)

Suggestionsregardingthecircumstanceswhenamanufacturinglicensewouldbeneededinadditiontoacultivationlicense.(174)(267)

Requireaseparatelicenseforanymanipulationtothecannabisplantthatwouldbe consideredmanufacturing a cannabis product, such as joints, dry sieving, andwaterconcentrating.(8)(72)

Concernsassociatedwiththesimplicityandadaptabilityoflicensingrules.(32) Concernsassociatedwithlicensingandapplicationcosts.(32)(36)(100)(136)(161)

(194)(268)(294)(295) Concerns associated with the number of cities and counties that are moving

forwardwithcannabislicensingunderMCRSAinordertohelpdeterminehowmanylicenseswillbeneeded.(33)

Suggestionsregardingthenumbersofeachtypeoflicense thatcanorshouldbeissued.(33)

Concerns associatedwith determining thebestequation for issuing cultivationlicensesatanygiventime.(33)

Questionssurroundingthenumberoflicensespermissiblebasedonacreageofparcels and/or questions and concerns surrounding acreage limitations. (113)(154)(233)(265)(308)

Cultivationpermitsneedtoallowforprocessingoperationssuchas:drying,curing,trimming,sorting,packaging,warehousing.(130)

Suggestionsregardingtheapproachtoallowingseparatelicenseestooperateonthesameparcel.(34)(35)

Questionsregardinghowmanylicensesanindividualandtheirfamilymembersandassociatesmayhold.(233)

Canlicensesbeswitchedbetweendifferentcannabiscultivationclasses?(233) Consider allowing parcels of a sufficient size to receive additional cultivation

permitsunderthesamelicense.(34)(35) Suggestionsthattheapproachtodefiningmixedlightshouldconsidertheamount

ofenergyuse.(130)




Regulationsshouldclarifywhetheradispensarycansellimmatureplantsand/orwhetheritcanholdanurserylicenseforthispurpose.(36)(96)

RegulationsshouldclarifywhetheraType10or10ADispensarycanholdaType4licenseandsellimmatureplants,oralternativelysell(butnotproduce)liveplantsundertheType10license.(196)

TheregulationsshouldallowlicensedcultivatorstotransportharvestedcannabisfromacultivationsitetoaprocessingsitewithouttheneedforaType12license.(36)

Theregulationsshouldallowcultivatorstoholdadispensarylicense(10Alicense).(36)

Thenumberof10Alicensesshouldbelimitedtoprotectsmallgrowers(194)(196) ClarifyanyproductionsizerequirementsorlimitationsonType4licenses.(36) Addanadditionallicensetypeforaspecialtycultivatorthatisupto2,500square

feet.(161) Supportfordevelopmentofcottagelicenses,includinghomebasedoperations.(66)

(228)(231)(326) Provideprovisional licenses forsmall farmers inorder for themtohaveample

timetomeetthenewregulations.(232) Willtherebeanopportunitytoupgradecultivationlicensesuponrenewal?(342)

Type3Limits

CDFAs limit mandate on Type 3 licenses should be applied to cultivationoperationsthatwereproposedafterthedatestatelicensesbecomeavailable.(9)

LimitType3permitstomostlyoutdoorgrowsandalsolimitthembasedontheeffecttheywillhaveonanygivenwatershed.(164)

Nurseries

Regulations should specify how nursery requirements related to pestdetection,prevention,quarantine,andoverallcleanlinesswillapplytocannabisnurseries.(13)(43)(96)

Cannabis nurseries should be subject to existing nursery stock licensingrequirementsandlabelrequirements.(13)

Concernsassociatedwiththeconsistencyofcannabisnurserystockdefinitionsandterms.(43)(110)

Requirethatanycannabisnurserystockthatisproduced,sold,ordistributedcomefromaType4licensedretailorwholesalenursery.(96)

Considerasimplifiedcomplianceprocessforretailnurseriesthatarenotrelatedtodispensaries.(153)

Thereshouldbenolimitonthesizeofanursery.(154)(251)




Suggestionthatthereisnopurposeforlimitingnurseriestofourlicensesof1acreeach,versusonelicensefor4acres.(154)

The ability to havemature plants to produce seeds is needed for the nurseryproductionprocess.(225)

Concernsthatlicensingcostsforsmallnurseriescouldbecostprohibitive.(295) Oppositiontotherequirementforadistributor.(331) Regulations should addresswholesalecannabis seedproduction for resale and

straindevelopment.(96)

InspectionsandRecords

UtilizetheU.S.FDAsFoodSafetyModernizationActasacomprehensivemodelfordraftingtheregulationsandinspectionproceduresestablishedintheMCCP.(6)

Requireallpermittedoperatorstokeepandmaintainallrecordsrelatedtobusinesssales,material inventory,staff,MSDSsheets formaterials thatareused,andotherstateandlocalrequiredrecords.(8)(53)(72)(93)

Questionsandconcernsregardingthenumberandtimingofinspections,bothasitrelatestoindividuallicenseesandtheoverallCDFAinspectionprocess.(8)(72)(257)(309)

Cannabis cultivation should be an internal system/database for localgovernmentstobeabletofilecomplaintswiththestateandhavethoseassociatedwithalicensekeeptrackofissuesthatarise.(8)

Concernsassociatedwithaccesstotheuniqueidentifierdatabasebylocalagencies.(8)(72)

Provideadvancednoticebeforeinspections;donotconductsurpriseinspectionsassomelocationsarenotopentothepublic.(30)(248)(267)

Addresshowcannabisseedswillbesubjecttoexistingrequirementsforsamplingtodetectdiseaseand,iftheymeetthespecificrequirements,certificationofseedsforpackaging,labeling,andsale.(13)(344)

Providegraceperiodsfortechnicalviolationsorimperfectrecordkeeping.(30) Recordsofplantdestructionaswellaseventsinthecannabislifecyclethatfall

outsideofexpectedparametersshouldbecompiled.(32)(124)(172) Cultivation operations must maintain records that include planting records,

propagationrecords,pesticideuserecords,andharvestrecords.(53)(93) Develop standardprotocol for inspections and provide the CACwith guidance

regarding the submission of Pest Damage Records and collection of pest samplesrelatedtocannabiscultivation.(96)

Concernsassociatedwiththecoststolocalandcountydepartmentsforresourcesusedtoensurethatgrowsitesaresafeandincompliancewithregulationsthroughproperinvestigationsandonsitevisitsoftheseareas.(102)(315)




Concernregardingcannabiscultivationsiteexpansionsafterthepreliminarypermitinspectionsarecompleted,andhowthiswouldbeprevented.(109)

Inspectionsshouldoccurpriortoorshortlyafterlicenseapproval.(100)(136) Lawenforcementshouldnotbeunnecessarilyinvolvedininspections.(164)(251) Lawenforcementshouldhavewarrantlessaccess.(279) Appoint a representative from each grow sitewhowill be taskedwithescorting

inspectorsontocannabissites.(164) Eachsiteshouldhaverecordsoftotalplantcount,weightofdryflowers,andproper

recordsofalldisposedcannabisflowers,plants,anddriedflowers.(172) Concerns regarding improper handling (e.g., exposure to air) during product

testing.(222) UtilizeQRcodetrackinginordertokeeprecordsofcannabisproducts.(267) Require all inspector personnel towearprotectivesuits in order to prevent the

potentialspreadofpeststohabitatareasoutsideofcultivationsites.(244)(290) Requirethirdpartycertifying/inspectionagencies.(64)

TrackandTrace

Utilizeconceptsofproduce traceability implementedby theagriculture industrywhendevelopingtrackandtracerequirements.(6)

Requireallcannabisproductstobetrackedthoughvariousstagesofcultivationsuchasproduction,manufacturing,processing,handling,transportation,sales,andconsumption.(6)(8)(72)(73)(279)

Concernsexpressingtheimportanceoftrackingcannabisthroughallstages.(102) Tracktheweightofcannabisplantsbeforeandaftertransport.(8)(72)(73)(124)

(172) Trackingtheweightofnonpsychoactiveplantmatterisnotnecessary.(262) Track the record of cannabisclonepurchases,vegging, flowering,andharvest

dates.(15)(61)(73)(124)(279) EachcannabisseedmustberegisteredforgerminationwithStaterequiredtags.

(124) Trackingofseedsisnotnecessary.Plantsshouldbetrackedfrom8inches.(248) Electronicformsoftrackingneedtobemadeavailablethatareapprovedbythe

state.(248) Requireallcannabisbusinessestoprovideperiodicdatatorelevantstateandlocal

regulatoryagenciesthatincludesvolumeandtrackingdatafromseedtosalesystemsaswellasretaildatafrompointofsalesystems.(32)




Suggestions regarding thesizeofaplantbeforeaunique identifier is required8inchclones,1footplants.(15)(61)(360)

Developanonlinedatabasewherethepubliccansearchfordetailed informationregardingthelicenseholderandhis/hercannabisoperation(s).(8)(72)

Trackandtrace technology is paramount to the successful implementation of aprogramthatmaintainssystemintegrityandpreventsinfiltrationofnonlicensedproducts.(19)(245)(332)

Allow forexisting trackingsystems and technologyutilizedby current cannabisbusinessestointegratewithCDFAtrackandtraceprocedures.(32)(45)(68)(86)(237)

TailortrackandtraceCDFAprocedurestoadheretobestpracticeswithrespecttoencryptionfordata.(32)

TailortrackandtraceCDFAprocedurestoprovideuniformthirdpartyaccesstocollecteddatatotheextentpermittedbythestateandlocalgovernments.(32)(247)

Tailor trackandtrace CDFA procedures to protect personal information ofpatientstotheextentmandatedinMCRSA.

Tailor trackandtrace CDFA procedures tominimize administrative burden tocannabisbusinesses.(32)

TailortrackandtraceCDFAprocedurestorequireanopenstandardandabilitytosourcegoodsfromthirdparties.(32)

Tailor trackandtrace CDFA procedures to be compatible with a variety ofhardwareandsoftwaresystems.(32)(45)(68)(86)(237)

The trackandtracesystemshouldallowall licenseefacingsystemactivities tobeperformedbyasecureopenaccessAPI(ApplicationProgramInterface).(32)

TheAPIshouldhaveabidirectionalintegration,berealtime,beaccessibletoanyfrontendapplicationthathasbeenvalidatedandhasappropriatecredentials,andhaveversioncontrol.(32)

Suggestionsthattherebeflexibilitytotagentireplantbatchesandlotsinsteadofindividualplants.(36)(130)(206)(259)(358)

Concernsthattaggingindividualplantsisineffectiveandhowitdoesnotprovideanyinformationastohowmuchproductwillbeavailable.(239)

Developatrackandtraceprogramthatallowsthestate,localjurisdictions,and/orlawenforcementtoaccesstodata.(36)(172)

Utilizebarcoding,QRand/orRFID tagging in the trackandtraceprogram. (45)(124)(267)

Cannabisproductsmustbetraceablebacktotheirrespectivecultivationsources.(53)(93)(269)

Howwill the trackandtrace program apply to staged harvests of the cannabisflower?(67)




Thetrackandtracesystemshouldendatthepointtheproductisdeliveredandentersadispensaryspointofsalesystem.(68)(86)

Comment on how smallscale, indoor cultivation that utilizes fully monitoredfacilitiesisbeneficialtothetrackandtracesystem.(83)

There should be specific labeling requirements contained in the trackandtracesystem.(90)

Howwillcannabisproductsthataretransportedbyairbetracked?(102) PromotionofGreenioskTrack,Trace/SeedtoBankTechnology.(107) ProvideGPStrackingandtracingofallpickup/deliveryvehiclemovements.(124) HowdoIparticipateinthetrackandtraceprogram?(127) The trackandtrace system being developed into theMCCP program needs to be

carefullyexaminedandthoughtoutbeforeimplementation.(331) Concerns associatedwith the difficulty in being able to track cannabis due to its

perishability.(331) HumboldtsCountyspredictivemodeloftrackingcannabisisabettermethodthan

taggingindividualplants.(196) Research Colorados trackandtrace program instead of trying to develop an

entirelynewprogram.(241) Request to provide consultation on the development of the trackandtrace

program.(245)(332) Onlythefinishedcannabisproductshouldbetrackedthroughthetrackandtrace

program.(254) Thetrackandtraceprogramshouldmonitorlaborcosts,workflowmethodology,

andplantlifecycle.(262) Thetrackandtraceprogramshouldonlymonitorhowmanyplantswereplanted,

whattheiryieldproducedofmedicalquality,andwheretheywent.Anythingmorethanthisisunnecessaryandcounterproductive.(268)

Concerns associated with the potential cost ofmaintaining the trackandtraceprogramonlocalgovernmentagencies.(315)

UseFlowHuborGreenBitastheprimarytrackandtracesoftware.(324) Concernthatthetrackandtraceprogramisnotpracticable.(347) Concerns associated with the proper tracking of cannabis products that are

transportedthroughoutthestate.(102)(124) Concerns associated with the required items on a transporters manifest for

transportationofcannabisgoods.(328) Concerns associated with the required documents that must accompany

transportdrivers, establishing the necessary thresholds for transporter licenses,anddrivercheckinsandreporting.(124)(328)




RequirespecialDMVendorsementfortransportdrivers.(124) Concerns associated with applying for a separate transporters license or if

transportisallowedunderacultivationpermitalone.(130) Transportersshouldbeallowedtotransportcannabisbetweenanytwolicense

holders. Specifically, they shouldbeable tomove cannabis from the cultivator tolicensedtestinglabs,processingfacilities,manufacturers,anddistributors.(167)

Other

Provideaccesstoaregulatedmarketplaceforgrowersasanincentivetogetthemtocomplywithregulationsontheircultivationoperations.(31)

Incentivizetheadoptionoforganic/probioticfarmingbycannabisgrowers.(262) Concerns associated with felons receiving licenses and permitting to conduct

cannabiscultivationoperations.(59) Concernsassociatedwiththepropertreatmentofworkersoncultivationsites.(59)

(99) Concerns associatedwithoutofstategrowerswho conduct cannabis cultivation

operationsduringgrowseasonandthenreturntotheirhomestatesafterwards.(59) Restrictgrantingandrenewalof licenses to in

california department of food and cannabis scoping... · california department of food and...

Documents