call for evidence better city deal: top priority...better city deal: top priority upgrade and...

12
Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority Edward Leigh, Better City Deal www.bettercitydeal.com @BetterCityDeal [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority

Edward Leigh, Better City Deal

www.bettercitydeal.com

@BetterCityDeal

[email protected]

Page 2: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

Better City Deal: Top Priority

Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years.

Cost unlikely to exceed £10m.

Provides opportunity to install traffic/journey monitoring equipment.

Enable trials of Inbound Flow Control (‘queue relocation’) – three initial locations suggested

Will yield immediate benefits ...

Page 3: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

Benefits of upgrading & integrating signals

Reduce everyday congestion markedly.

Reduce pollution throughout the city.

Give priority to buses approaching junctions.

Enable a much more effective response to traffic incidents, especially on A14 and M11.

Comprehensive traffic/journey monitoring will yield more accurate data for future planning.

Better City Deal: Top Priority

Page 4: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

Implement Inbound Flow Control Relocate queues to the edge of the city.

Traffic, including buses, moves freely beyond the control points.

A bypass lane enables buses to jump ahead of any queue at a control point.

Work involved has lower impact on homes and businesses.

Responsive to demand.

No queues at off-peak times.

Opportunity to raise money from businesses.

Better City Deal: Top Priority

Page 5: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

Inbound Flow Control example

Page 6: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

Access charge

Option to raise revenue and reduce pollution: 1. Access to the bypass lane could require a pre-paid annual

pass.

2. Candidate applicants might include:

Buses and coaches (PSVs)

Taxis

Retail delivery vehicles (HGVs and LGVs)

Couriers

3. Access monitored by ANPR cameras in real time.

4. Cost of a pass proportional to weight and emission rating of vehicle.

Page 7: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

More information

Smart Traffic Management:

bit.ly/bcd-stm

www.bettercitydeal.com

@BetterCityDeal

[email protected]

Page 8: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

How to deter residents from driving

Sticks

1. Close more residential roads to through traffic.

2. Interrupt inner orbital routes (e.g. Northampton St & East Rd).

3. Restrict movements at junctions between main and residential roads.

4. Tax workplace parking spaces.

5. Reduce availability of parking, multi-storey and on-street.

6. Increase parking permit fees for second & third cars.

Carrots

1. Schools transport co-ordinator.

2. Incentivise employers to install secure cycle parking and changing facilities.

3. City-wide goods delivery network.

4. Better and safer provision for cycling and walking.

5. Better bus services.

Page 9: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

Cons of a congestion charge

1. Accessing the city is a rich person’s privilege.

2. Efficacious fee unknowable in advance (£11.50 in London).

3. Not responsive to demand by hour and day.

4. May still need bus lanes.

5. Creates an expectation of priority over cyclists & pedestrians.

6. Reduces labour mobility for lower paid & competition in manual trades.

7. High administration & enforcement costs (33% in London).

8. Rejected by Edinburgh and Manchester in referendums.

9. Many city residents assume they won’t pay or will get a large discount (90% in London).

Page 10: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

A1303 / Madingley Rd trial

Page 11: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

A1307 / Babraham Rd trial

Page 12: Call for Evidence Better City Deal: Top Priority...Better City Deal: Top Priority Upgrade and integrate the city’s traffic signals Deliverable within three years. Cost unlikely to

A1309 / Milton Rd trial