cameron university department of music school of liberal arts bachelor of arts in music (160) cip...

36
Cameron University Department of Music School of Liberal Arts Bachelor of Arts in Music (160) CIP Code 500901 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010- 2011 Fall 2010

Upload: sharon-carpenter

Post on 26-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Cameron UniversityDepartment of MusicSchool of Liberal Arts

Bachelor of Arts in Music(160)

CIP Code 500901

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011Fall 2010

Learning Outcomes

(Items in bold are chosen outcomes)

1. To become aware of, organize, recognize, listen to, assimilate, and respond to factual knowledge of music literature and history through its cultural and historical perspective;

2. To recognize, identify, analyze, and re-create concepts related to sequential music theory including developing music notational skills on a computer utilizing the appropriate software;

3. To perform and develop the basic utilization of fine motor skills related to keyboard skills and conducting and the chosen major field of applied study;

4. To perform skillfully and develop appreciation for accompanying and large ensemble performance while experiencing a variety of repertoire.

Bloom’s Taxonomy

All learning outcomes are directly linked to Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Most music students come into the program with the intense desire to learn and become better artists. Most music courses offer a blend of all three major areas of Bloom’s taxonomy.

1. Affective: Great care is taken in the first 2 years of a music student’s academic career. We have developed standardized testing and curricula to insure that each student is able to receive the same knowledge, organize it, and set a standard value. There is consistency in text usage, adherence to NASM standards and clear rubrics for Junior standing.

2. Psychomotor: These skills are critically honed in the private studio and piano classes.

3. Cognitive: As mentioned earlier; theory, piano, and sight singing classes are offered in an order that allows the student to remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create materials and information from their Freshman to Senior years.

1. The University Mission Statement:The Bachelor of Music program is designed in accordance with NASM accreditation to prepare students for professional success and the tools for life-long learning. The program is one of the most important aspects of this region’s cultural lifestyle. In addition, the faculty are devoted to a curriculum that is student-centered. All teaching classrooms have state-of-the-art equipment in line with the University mission statement.

2. The University Strategic Plan 2013: The Strategic plan addresses issues of new educational partnerships, improved course delivery, and enriching the educational, cultural, and social life of the region. The plan also address the desire to achieve or exceed the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education’s target retention and graduation rates for Cameron University. We intend to address the methods of improved course delivery in this presentation. The Bachelor of Music program enriches the community as previously mentioned in the university mission statement. In addition, the Chair of the Music department has initiated an extensive program that involves the faculty with all the regional music teachers in an effort to improve recruitment and outreach.

3. Program Outcomes and our Students:It is the department’s main goal to enrich and improve the instruction of our students. Recent innovations and changes in curriculum are all geared to improved student retention and learning. We believe that it will take time for these improvements to be noticeable but some empirical evidence will be presented that suggests that our actions are working.

Alignment of Program Outcomes

4. The School of Liberal Arts Mission Statement:The School of Liberal Arts mission statement is closely aligned with the Department of Music. The Bachelor of Arts degree will supply our community with students that will encourage culture and scholarship in the community as teachers and mentors. These same students will produce concerts, recitals, theatre productions, art exhibitions, lectures, symposia, workshops, camps, and public forums which will enrich the intellectual and cultural lives of all our constituents.

Alignment of Program Outcomes

Department of Music Measures of Student Learning For B.A. in Music Degree Direct1. Semester Evaluations (private studio)2. Junior Standing Barrier3. Pre- and/or Post-testing4. Exit Exam for graduating Seniors5. ETS Major Field Test for Music (new for Fall 2010) Indirect1. Alumni reports

Program methodologies to address shortfalls in student learning prior to

graduation

1. Music Fundamentals (classroom and online)

2. Semester evaluations3. Faculty and student tutoring 4. Music notation workshops5. Assigning and tracking midterm grades

to identify students with shortfalls (proposed)

Program actions since last assessment presentation

1. Initial achievement in Harmony and Structure I classes looks promising. This indicates a probability of better student performance in progressing through core classes and a higher retention rate. Subsequent multi-year tracking will provide additional data to substantiate this action.

2. Enrollment in and pass rate in Music Fundamentals was higher after adding the classroom section.

3. Testing of incoming Freshmen was better. All scholarship applicants were tested and properly placed. Issues with Banner prevented this from being implemented for all Freshmen.

Action Plan #1. To increase student achievement in core theory classes, Music Fundamentals was offered as a regular class along with an online component during the Spring and Summer semesters. Increased efficiency of testing for incoming Freshmen was implemented to identify deficiencies and insure proper placement.

Action Plan #2. Offer increased counseling and faculty contact to facilitate early identification of students who will be pursuing the BA in Music degree. This should help with accurate classification of students according to degree plans and more accurate data for tracking purposes.

1. Students are notified early and often about establishing accurate degree codes for the degree

they are pursuing.2. Faculty is tracking degree codes through the

Registrar’s listing and following up with students to ensure accurate listings.

3. Faculty is available to help students follow posted degree plans to aid with timely progression through

the plans to graduation.4. This continues to be an issue as students do not

consistently inform faculty and change degree codes with the Registrar’s office when they decide to purse

another degree plan.

Action Plan #3. Discuss possibility of identifying funds for providing service awards to upper level students to tutor at-risk students.

1. No funds were available to offer students.2. Theory faculty made themselves available for tutoring

and students did utilize this option and showed improvement in achievement.

Action Plan #4. Offer music notation seminar at a slightly later time in the Fall semester to create a higher enrollment number and offer more opportunities for success.

1. Enrollment was lower in the music notation seminar for Fall semester.

2. We will continue to offer the seminar at the later date but improve faculty advisement at enrollment.

3. No direct multi-year data is available at this time, but increased ability to use current notation software

should become apparent in student achievement as they progress through core classes and into upper

division Theory requirements.

Action Plan #5. Hold auditions at the beginning of every semester for large ensembles to provide a base-line score for improvement.

1. Auditions did occur in some ensembles but not in all large ensembles.

2. We would still like to implement this action plan in all large ensembles beginning with Fall semester.

Program objectives PROGRAM GOAL

PROGRAM OBJECTIVE

CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE

MEASUREMENT OF PROGRAM OBJECTIVE

Measurements

Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments

Methods used to determine reliability of measurements

Schedule for measurements

#2 To recognize, identify, analyze, and re-create concepts related to sequential music theory including developing music notational skills on a computer utilizing the appropriate software.

MUSC 2312, 2332, 3313, 3333

(direct)Pre- and/or Post-testing each semester.

(indirect)Alumni reports

ETS Major Field Test in Music.

Students who score higher on post-tests enjoy higher retention and graduation rates.AP guidelines.

Each semester for pre- and post-tests.MFT in addition to Senior Exit Exam.

Learning Outcome #2

To recognize, identify, analyze, and re-create concepts related to sequential music theory including developing music notational

skills on a computer utilizing the appropriate software.

Program Objectives and Measurements

The Bachelor of Arts in Music student will take courses related to the second learning outcome including Harmony

& Structure I, II, III, and IV.

These classes are measured by a pre- and post-test given each semester. In addition, the vast majority of work is done

using the most current music notation software available, currently Finale and Sibelius. The student will take the

Major Field Achievement Test upon completion of the core curriculum. This test will supplement the departmental Exit

Exam.

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

BA Harmony & Structure Sequence

70

75

80

85

90

95

Harmony & Structure I 88 92 92 79 82

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

BA Harmony & Structure Sequence

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Harmony & Structure II NA 92 74 79 73

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

BA Harmony & Structure Sequence

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

84

Harmony & Structure III 80 75 82 82 76

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

BA Harmony & Structure Sequence

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Harmony & Structure IV 86 66 NA 78 77

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis, cont.

The data indicates a slight downward trend in the achievement rate in student learning, especially in the first year. This supports the need to pursue our Action Plan including increased testing of incoming Freshmen, offering of Music Fundamentals to those who need it and making peer and faculty tutoring available. On the positive side, the average pre-test to post-test improvement rate for all BA students in Harmony & Structure classes in 2009-2010 was 86%.

We continue to make adjustments to the curriculum in accordance with NASM standards and recommendations and faculty assignments have stabilized. A theory area coordinator helps with continuity of curriculum and measurement.

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis, cont.

Enrollment

Enrollment Numbers (for BA only) 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Harmony & Structure 1

1 1 2 4 3

H&S 2 2 3 6 1 H&S 3 6 3 7 3 4 H&S 4 6 3 7 4 No data is available for years left blank.

Program objectives PROGRAM GOAL

PROGRAM OBJECTIVE

CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE

MEASUREMENT OF PROGRAM OBJECTIVE

Measurements

Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments

Methods used to determine reliability of measurements

Schedule for measurements

#3 To perform and develop the basic utilization of fine motor skills related to keyboard skills and conducting and the chosen major field of applied study.

MUSC 1201, 3612, 3801, 3802, 4801, 4802

(direct)Pre- and/or Post-semester tests;Semester evaluations

(indirect)Alumni reports

ETS Major Field Test.Rubrics used in semester evaluations of applied study.

Semester evaluations are given by a panel of faculty members. Faculty assessment for departmental performances.

Each semester.Junior Barrier Evaluation is given at completion of core classes and at least 4 semesters of applied study.

Learning Outcome #3

To perform and develop the basic utilization of fine motor skills related to keyboard skills and conducting and the chosen major field of applied study;

Program Objectives and Measurements

The Bachelor of Arts in Music student will take a number of courses related to the third learning outcome including Class Piano, Conducting and applied lessons.

These classes are measured by a pre- and post-test given each semester. In addition, there are semester evaluations and a Junior Barrier Evaluation by a panel of faculty given for applied studies.

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

Fundamentals of Conducting

7580

859095

100105

Conducting (BAonly)

100 95 85

2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009-

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

Class Piano IV

75

80

85

90

95

Class Piano IV(BA only)

90 83 90

2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009-

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

Applied Piano

70

75

80

85

90

95

Applied Piano(BA only)

89 87 78 90

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

Applied Vocal

9192

939495

9697

Applied Vocal(BA only)

93 94 96 94

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

Applied Instrumental

0

50

100

150

Applied Inst.(BA)

91 95 90 74 71

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

Most of the data in the applied area and class piano indicates a fairly consistent rate of student achievement. The addition of the new rubric for semester evaluation has helped and will continue to be revised to aid in assessment.

Faculty will grade departmental performances throughout the semester to aid in assessment data available to applied studio instructors.

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis, cont.

Enrollment Numbers (for BA only) 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Conducting 2 2 2 Class Piano 2 3 1 Applied Piano 2 2 2 1 Applied vocal 5 4 5 4 Applied instrumental

5 3 5 4 3

No data is available for years left blank or there were no BA students enrolled.

Program objectives PROGRAM GOAL

PROGRAM OBJECTIVE

CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE

MEASUREMENT OF PROGRAM OBJECTIVE

Measurements

Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments

Methods used to determine reliability of measurements

Schedule for measurements

4. To perform skillfully and develop appreciation for accompanying and large ensemble performance while experiencing a variety of repertoire;

MUSC 1110, 1111, 1120, 1121, 1141, 3160, 3161

(direct)Semester evaluations

(indirect)Alumni reports

Rubrics used in semester evaluations.

Departmental performances for accompanying and public performances of large ensembles.

Each semester.

Learning Objective #4

To perform skillfully and develop appreciation for accompanying and large ensemble performance

while experiencing a variety of repertoire;

Program Objectives and Measurements

The Bachelor of Arts in Music student will take a number of courses related to the fourth learning outcome. These courses will include large ensembles such as Concert Choir, Concert Band and Civic Orchestra.

These classes are measured by performance objectives and goals given each semester. In addition, there are semester evaluations given for applied studies.

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis

Concert Band

90

95

100

105

Concert Band (BAonly)

97 98 100

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis, cont.

Most of the data indicates a consistent level trend in student learning.

Accompanying students are assigned other applied students and perform regularly at Area and Departmental performances.

Large ensemble assessment includes rehearsal and performance assessments by the instructors. Effort is made to assign appropriate and current literature for study and preparation.

Display of Assessment Data and Trend Analysis, cont.

Enrollment Numbers (for BA only) 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Concert Band 4 3 3 Concert Choir Civic Orchestra

No data is available for years left blank or there was no enrollment of BA students.

Action plan

1. Require testing of all incoming Freshmen for accurate placement.

2. Begin immediately to track assessment records of incoming freshmen in all courses (pre- and post-tests) to follow their progress through the course of study. This should provide invaluable date concerning the correlation between current assessment tools and graduation/retention rates and help to assess the validity/reliability of these tools.

3. Emphasize improved faculty advisement at enrollment to place students in notation seminar that need it.

4. Begin to track anonymous faculty assessment of departmental recitals (including piano majors performing as accompanists). The data will be collected after every recital.

5. Implement the use of the ETS Major Field Achievement Test in addition to the existing Exit Exam.

6. Hold auditions in large ensembles at the beginning of every semester to provide a base-line score for improvement.

7. Identify and allocate funds for a service award to upper division students to tutor at-risk students.

Published information on graduates

Academic Year 09-10 Entered Graduate School Working In Discipline Unknown

Spring 2010 1 1 0

Summer 2010 0 1 0

Fall 2009 0 1 0

Total 1 3 0

Please provide the headcount for placement of graduates from last Academic Year