can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

31
Essential Question : Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war? DO NOW : Have you ever wanted to hit someone but you knew it would cause so much chaos that you chose not to?

Upload: others

Post on 03-Jun-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

■Essential Question:

■Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

■DO NOW:Have you ever wanted to hit someone but you knew it would cause so much chaos that you chose not to?

Page 2: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

Learning Targets and Intentions of the Lesson

I Want Students to:

1. KNOW how the different ideologies of the

USSR, Communism and the USA’s Capitalism

led to the Cold War. 2. UNDERSTAND Explain

the significance of covert actions during the

Cold War to include: Bay of Pigs, the Cuban

Missile Crisis, and how it is relevant to the

battle for the People of the Third World. 3.

Complete the To the Brink – and Beyond

organizer to include the Cold War Vocabulary

(SKILL).

Page 3: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

Summary

■Post War Europe

■The Cold War

■The Arms Race

■The Space Race

■Bay of Pigs

■Cuban Missile Crisis

Page 4: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

Truman Doctrine [1947]

1. Civil War in Greece.

2. USSR Wants Dardanelles from Turkey

3. U. S. to support all who want to be free

4. The U.S. gave Greece & Turkey $400 million in aid.

Page 5: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

Marshall Plan [1948]1. “European Recovery

Program.”

2. Secretary of State, George Marshall

3. The U. S. should provide aid to all European nations that need it.

4. $12.5 billion of US aid to Western Europe extended to Eastern Europe & USSR, [but this was rejected].

Page 6: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

A Clash of Ideologies

■The Soviet Union (U.S.S.R.) believes itshould assume their rightful place; along side the United States (U.S.A.) as a world superpower.

■ So, what begins is a battle of wills, abattle for world superiority.

■ Is the U.S.S.R. ready to compete with “Mighty America?”

Page 7: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

The “Iron Curtain”

From Stettin in the Balkans, to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the Continent. Behind that line lies the ancient capitals of Central and Eastern Europe.

-- Sir Winston Churchill, 1946

Page 8: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

The Cold

War

Page 9: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

The Ideological Struggle

Soviet & Eastern Bloc

Nations[“Iron Curtain”]

US & the Western

Democracies

GOAL spread world-wide Communism

GOAL “Containment”of Communism & the eventual collapse of the Communist world.[George Kennan]

METHODOLOGIES:

Espionage [KGB vs. CIA]

Arms Race [nuclear escalation]

Ideological Competition for the minds and hearts of Third World peoples [Communist govt. & command economy vs. democratic govt. & capitalist economy] “proxy wars”

Bi-Polarization of Europe [NATO vs. Warsaw Pact]

Page 10: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

From 1945 to 1991, the USA & USSR used a variety of strategies to win the Cold War

Page 11: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

Truman Doctrine

In the early years of the Cold War (1945-1949), the USA used a containment policy to successfully

stop the spread of communism in Europe

Marshall Plan NATO Berlin Airlift

Page 12: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

When communism spread to China in 1949, the USA feared

the “domino theory” & became more aggressive in its

efforts to stop communism

The USA went to war in Korea to defend South Korea

from communism

The Soviet Union supplied weapons to the communists

in North Korea during the war

The type of indirect fight between the USA & USSR

is called a “proxy war”

Page 13: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

From 1949 to 1970, the Cold War escalated as a result of a nuclear arms race, space race, & espionage

Page 14: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

The Arms

Race

Page 15: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

The U.S. monopoly on nuclear weapons ended in 1949 when the USSR successfully tested an atomic bomb

The Soviet development of the atomic bomb led to a nuclear arms race between the USA & USSR

Page 16: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

In 1952, the USA tested the first hydrogen bomb which

is 1,000 times more powerful than the atomic bomb

The Soviet Union responded by

detonating its own hydrogen bomb in 1953

Page 17: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

By 1959, both the USA & USSR developed rockets called intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) that could deliver nuclear warheads to distant

targets

U.S. Titan ICMB from the 1960s Soviet ICMBs from 1960-1975

Soviet Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) U.S. Polaris Submarine

Page 18: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

In the 1950s, U.S. President Eisenhower escalated the Cold War by using brinkmanship: threatening to use

nuclear weapons & willingness to go to the brink of war

If the USSR attacked a NATO

member, the U.S. would

use massive retaliation: attack every

major Soviet city & military target

As a result, the USA & USSR

began stockpiling nuclear weapons

& building up their militaries

Page 19: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

With the USA & USSR in possession of large nuclear stockpiles, each side could destroy each other:

this was known as Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD)

Throughout the Cold War, the USA & USSR

looked for ways to gain first

strike capability

Page 20: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

The Space

Race

Page 21: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

In 1957, the USSR used its first ICBM to launch Sputnik, the

first satellite into space

Sputnik shocked Americans who feared the U.S. had fallen behind the USSR in

science & technology

As a result of Sputnik, the Cold War escalated into a space race to show American & Soviet dominance

Page 22: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

In 1958, the USA created National Aeronautics &

Space Administration (NASA) to catch up to the USSR…

…U.S. schools promoted math, science, & technology

The USSR repeatedly beat the USA in space by launching the first

man into orbit & orbiting the moon

NASA’s original seven NASA Mercury astronauts

Page 23: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

In 1962, President John Kennedy committed the USA to beating the Soviet Union

in the race to the moon

In 1969, Apollo 11 landed U.S. astronauts on the moon

Page 24: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

The Battle for

Control of the Third

World

Page 25: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

During the Cold War, the USA & USSR created intelligence agencies, the CIA and KGB, in order

to spy and carry out covert operations

The USA & USSR used spies to

gather intelligence

Convicted spiesJulius & Ethel Rosenberg

U.S. & Soviet spy planes gathered information also

Page 26: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

The Cold War escalated as the threat of communism spread into the Middle East, Africa, & Latin America

The CIA overthrew the governments of Iran & Guatemala and intervened in Egypt, Bolivia,

Chile, El Salvador, and Cuba to stop communism

Page 27: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

Bay of Pigs Debacle (1961)

Page 28: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

Overview of Kennedy, the Cold War & Cuba

Page 29: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

The Cuban Missile Crisis brought the United States & Soviet Union to a near nuclear war in 1962

Page 30: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

Critical Thinking Question A

Page 31: Can a ideological war be more dangerous than a physical war?

Critical Thinking Question B