can we accurately predict rtp or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 no intramuscular...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Can we accurately predict RTP?
or flawed fortune telling
Johannes Tol
![Page 2: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
I, Johannes Tol, or a family member(s), have relevant financial relationships to be discussed, directly or
indirectly, referred to or illustrated with or without recognition within the presentation as follows:
Grants for conducting trials on the effect of PRP in acute hamstring injuries (Arthrex)
![Page 3: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Can we predict RTP?
Clinical examsMRI
![Page 4: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Clinical predictors RTP?
(Schut et al. Sports Med. Published online 18 October 2016)
Level of evidence Clinical predictor
Strong -
ModerateVAS pain, self-predicted RTS,
clinician predicted RTS
LimitedVisible bruising, muscle pain during every day
activities, popping sound at injury, forced to stop
within 5 min, width of palpation pain, pain on trunk
flexion, pain on active knee flexion
Conflicting/
No…
![Page 5: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MRI predictors RTP?
Reurink et al. Sports Med. 2014
Level of evidence MRI predictor
Strong -
ModerateMRI negative
proximal free tendon avulsion
Limited
Conflicting/
No
GRADING
Intramuscular tendon
![Page 6: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
7
![Page 7: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Predicting RTP - MRI grading
Peetrons. et al. European Radiology 2002. 12:35-43.
Grade I Grade II Grade III
Oedema Disruption Total rupture
Injury severity
![Page 8: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
MRI grading: overlap BETWEEN Grades
Return to Play (days)
422 2217 371
Ekstrand J. et al. Hamstring muscle injuries in professional football: the correlation of MRI findings with return to playBr J Sports Med 2011
Grade II: Edema with fiber disruptionGrade I: Edema without fiber disruption
![Page 9: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Variance WITHIN MRI grades
Return to Play (days) 422 22
“Coach, based on best available evidence ….. he will play after 2 or 42 days”
Grade II: Edema with fiber disruption
Ekstrand J. et al. Hamstring muscle injuries in professional football: the correlation of MRI findings with return to playBr J Sports Med 2011
![Page 10: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1 Creighton DW, Shrier I, Shultz R, et al. Return-to-play in sport: a decision-based model. Clin J Sport Med 2010;20:379–85.
ClinicalPredictors
Enemy:Variance
The enemy of accurate prediction: unexplained VARIANCE
![Page 11: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
A new serious hamstring injury ?
The intramuscular tendon
Recurrence
4 %
vs
57-63%
Retun to play
20 vs 60 days
![Page 13: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
A new serious hamstring injury ?
The intramuscular tendon
![Page 14: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Variance WITHIN intramuscular tendon
injuries
12818
“Coach, based on best
available evidence …..
he will play after 18 or 128
days”
Intramuscular tendon injury
Return to Play
(days)
Pollock 2014, Comin 2012
Re-injury 60%
![Page 15: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Data from Qatar
Return to Play
(days)
499 2922 377
No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion,
N = 41
Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 %
Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion
N = 29
Made van der A. et al. Intramuscular tendon involvement on MRI has limited value for predicting time to return to play following hamstring injury. Br J Sports Med 2017
![Page 16: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Back to clinical daily practiceCan we narrow the confidence interval with MRI ?
211 45425
MRI variables:Grade II3D extent of edema3D extent of disruptionLocationFree tendon involvement
![Page 17: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Jacobsen P, Witvrouw E, Muxart P, Tol JL, Whiteley R. The value of delayed clinical evaluation after hamstring injury. Br J Sports Med – 2016
451 21
Back to clinical daily practiceDelayed clinical evaluation (7 days)
Evolution at injury + 7 days- Vas pain injury- Days till pain free walking- Days injury till physio- Football- Palpation- Flexibility- Strength- SL Bridge pain free
Return to Play (days)
2616
![Page 18: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Can we accurately predict RTP? NO
Trust on clinical exam
By, bye MRI
Take Home
![Page 19: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
• Acknowledgements
Guus Reurink
Adam Weir
Gert Jan Goudswaard
Maarten Moen
Mario Maas
Gino Kerkhoffs
Robbart Van Linschoten
Monique van Heumen
Jithsa Monte
Roald Bahr
Emad Almusa
Rodney Whiteley
Bruce Hamilton
Erik Witvrouw
Sirine Boukarroum
Aziz Farooq
Phillipp Jacobsen
Nicol van Dyk
Polyvios Kyritsis
Theodosia Palli
Andreas Serner
Anne D.van der Made
Arnhild Bakken
Tone Bere
Paul Dijkstra
Juan-Manuel Alonso
SMP group
Radiology Dep.
Ali Guermazi
Frank Roemer
Lotte Schut
Jolanda Maskant
Robin Vermeulen
Ozgur Kilic
![Page 20: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Can we predict Re-injury?
Clinical examsMRI
![Page 21: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
MRI predictors for re-injury?
Van Heumen, accepted BJSM 2016
Level of evidence MRI baseline MRI at RTP
Strong
ModerateIntramuscular
tendon, biceps
femoris
Fibrosis not
associated
LimitedNo. muscles,
transverse size
edema
Presence, extent
edema
Conflicting/
No
![Page 22: Can we accurately predict RTP or flawed fortune telling ......7 22 37 9 29 49 No intramuscular (i.m.) tendon lesion, N = 41 Re-injury 7 % Re-injury 10 % Yes intramuscular (i.m.) tendon](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060708/6073f22e59ebe6114b6f3a2c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Clinical predictors for re-injury
De Visser et al. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:124–130.
Moderate
evidence