cancer survivorship...... meeting the needs of people following cancer treatment dr karen roberts...
TRANSCRIPT
Cancer survivorship ......meeting the needs of people following cancer treatment
Dr Karen RobertsMacmillan Nurse Consultant / Reader
North of England Cancer Network Survivorship LeadNorthern Gynaecological Oncology Centre
Northumbria University
• To consider today:– A ‘helicopter’ view of life after cancer
and a national update– What people want (and need) following
cancer treatment– Projects across the North of England
Cancer Network– The key messages about survivorship
and the implications for future work– Discuss how to move forward
Please get involved
NECN Survivorship steering
groupStrategy,
commissioning and
implementation plan
Education needs
Pilots eg. HOPE /
MBCT-Ca
Influencing guidelines in all
site specific groups
Pelvic project eg. Pilot implementation
of GI treatment algorithms
Do we really understand survivorship?
2 million cancer survivors
1/4 to 1/5 of people (up to 500,000 people) currently
experience consequences of cancer and its
treatment that have an adverse impact on their
quality of their life (Armes et al, 2009)
This number is expected to increase to
600,000 by 2020 (Maddams et al, 2009)
Endocrine
Cognitive problems
Cardiac dysfunction
Renal dysfunction
Infertility & sexuality
Bowel/bladder problems
Second tumours
Emotional problems
Gill Levitt 2008
Public health problem?• The impact of adverse effects increasing - more
cancer patients treated earlier & living longer• Late effects contribute to cancer survivors
having worse health than those without a ca diagnosis, similar to those with long term conditions
• A spectrum - low grade to catastrophic but not routinely recognised, documented or managed
The risks of surviving are considerable
• Survivors of childhood cancers have a >19 fold risk of developing a second malignancy (Dickerman 2007)
• Survivors of cancer are at greater risk of second malignancies, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and other chronic conditions (Demark-Wahnefried et al 2005)
Particularly if you do not change your lifestyle….
• Worse overall & disease free survival associated with obesity, poor diet and inactivity (Holmes et al 2005, Haydon et al 2006, Meyerhardt et al 2007)
• Continuing to smoke is associated with poorer QoL (Garces et al 2004), worse treatment toxicity (Wells et al 2004) and poorer survival (Fox et al 2004)
Paul ValeryFrench critic & poet (1871 - 1945)
“The trouble with our times is that the future is not what
it used to be”
• Overall, 63% of males and 54% of females who are living with a diagnosis of cancer are aged 65 and over (ISD 2008)
• As many as 1 in 6 adult patients over 65 in a GP practice are survivors of cancer (Grunfeld 2005)
• A hugely diverse group• Cancer may not be the
biggest problem
A new generation of cancer survivors
“For a growing number of people, cancer is no longer immediately
life threatening…. an increasingly unpredictable illness trajectory where little is
known about the health outcomes of individuals over and above their chances of surviving the disease”
(J Corner EJON 2008)
Why don’t we know?• Medical focus on prognosis, survival, objective
markers of recurrence is hard to shift• Incomplete reporting and inconsistent
measurement of long term side effects• Treatments are changing, long term side effects are
unknown • Context of care is changing - outpatient ‘self-care’ • ‘End of treatment’ / ‘end of life’ much less clear cut• Evidence we have is limited to the easily
measurable and the trial minority
Survivorship and the new landscape for health and social care
• Wellness not illness– Health promotion and education– Managing transitions
• Late effects surveillance– GP treatment summary and survivorship care plans– Enabling self-management
• Key worker role - may change from ‘specialist’ to ‘generalist’• Involving patients and carers – our greatest untapped
resource
CCaT Consequences of Cancer Treatment Collaborative
• The Consequences of Cancer Treatment collaborative (CCaT) was created in 2009 by Macmillan Cancer Support to influence and improve care for cancer survivors suffering side effects of treatment
• We are 12 people from England and Scotland, all research-active nurses or allied health professionals
• As "hybrid creatures" we bridge gaps between research and practice, by speaking the languages of clinicians, academics, educationalists, service improvers and policy makers.
• www.cancerconsequences.org
17
Consequences of Cancer Treatment
Collaborative
Conducting
meaningful
and rigorous
research
Raising
awareness
and delivering
education
Influencing
policy and
changing the
culture of care
Developing
sustainable
services /
systems of
care
10 Top Tips for Cancer Survivors- creating the activated patient
The ‘3 P’s’ of cancer survivorship care
Conceptually, the care delivery falls into 3 major domains:
• Palliation of ongoing symptoms.• Prevention of late effects of cancer
treatment.• Health Promotion to maximise future
wellbeing. (Ganz,P.A. 2011)
• Fear of recurrence is the greatest concern in cancer survivors (Humphris & Ozakinci 2006)
• 5 out of 6 top unmet needs relate to fears for the future (Armes et al 2007)
Greater attention to known unmet needs
Mindfulness based cognitive therapy for cancer (MBCT-Ca) project
• Part of the NCSI test community. • Partnership working with South of Tyne PCT’s,
acute trusts, mental health trust and cancer network.
• Development of a group intervention for cancer survivors which is skills based.
• Community based – normalising adaptation and integration to a new normal.
• Building upon strengths and developing resilience in the face of adversity.
Public images of survival can be inspirational
“Live strong is exactly I guess what it says. It’s one thing to live, but it’s another thing to live strong, to attack the day and attack your life with a whole new attitude. This was a gift for
me. I guess before the illness I just lived. Now, after the illness, I live strong….
I’m Lance Armstrong, and I’m a cancer survivor”
LiveStrong.org / online survivorship care plan
“I need to know that this is my body. And I need to know everything that is happening to my body. But most of all I need to know that you know that within my body there is
me”
The need to recognise the individual
Michele Angelo Petrone, Artist
Diagnosed with Hodgkins lymphoma aged 30, died 2007 aged 43
The Questions • What are the issues or problems to be tackled ?• How do we screen / assess?• What interventions work!• What testing should be done in NECN?• How will we know if we have made a difference ?• What further research is needed ?• How does this work link to the management of other
long term conditions?• What may the work plan look like for our network?
Acknowledgements
Prof Jane Maher, Dr Diana Greenfield, Dr Isabel White, Dr Mary Wells and my colleagues and friends from CCaT.
Dr Sanjay Rao, Consultant Liasion Psychiatrist