capital budgeting decisions - nely bachsin blog · pdf filetypical capital budgeting decisions...

120
Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Capital Budgeting Decisions Chapter Fourteen

Upload: vuongdien

Post on 11-Feb-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Capital Budgeting Decisions

Chapter Fourteen

Page 2: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Typical Capital Budgeting Decisions

Plant expansionPlant expansion

Equipment selectionEquipment selection Equipment replacementEquipment replacement

Lease or buyLease or buy Cost reductionCost reduction

Page 3: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Typical Capital Budgeting Decisions

Capital budgeting tends to fall into two broad Capital budgeting tends to fall into two broad Capital budgeting tends to fall into two broad Capital budgeting tends to fall into two broad categories . . .categories . . .

Screening decisionsScreening decisions.. Does a proposed project Does a proposed project meet some preset standard of acceptance?meet some preset standard of acceptance?

Preference decisionsPreference decisions.. Selecting from among Selecting from among several competing courses of action. several competing courses of action.

Page 4: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Time Value of Money

A dollar today is worth A dollar today is worth

more than a dollar a more than a dollar a

year from now. year from now.

Therefore, investments Therefore, investments

that promise earlier that promise earlier

returns are preferable to returns are preferable to

those that promise later those that promise later

returns. returns.

Page 5: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Time Value of Money

The capital

budgeting

techniques that best

recognize the time

value of money are

those that involve

discounted cash

flows.

Page 6: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective 1

Evaluate the acceptability Evaluate the acceptability

of an investment project of an investment project

using the net present using the net present

value method.value method.

Page 7: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Net Present Value Method

To determine net present value we . . .To determine net present value we . . .

Calculate the present value of cash inflows,Calculate the present value of cash inflows,

Calculate the present value of cash outflows,Calculate the present value of cash outflows,

Subtract the present value of the outflows from the Subtract the present value of the outflows from the

present value of the inflows.present value of the inflows.

Page 8: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

General decision rule . . .

If the Net Present

Value is . . . Then the Project is . . .

Positive . . .

Acceptable, since it promises a

return greater than the required

rate of return.

Zero . . .

Acceptable, since it promises a

return equal to the required rate

of return.

Negative . . .

Not acceptable, since it promises

a return less than the required

rate of return.

The Net Present Value Method

Page 9: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Net Present Value Method

Net present value analysis

emphasizes cash flows and not

accounting net income.

The reason is that

accounting net income is

based on accruals that

ignore the timing of cash

flows into and out of an

organization.

Page 10: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Typical Cash Outflows

Repairs andRepairs and

maintenancemaintenance

IncrementalIncremental

operatingoperating

costscosts

InitialInitial

investmentinvestment

WorkingWorking

capitalcapital

Page 11: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Typical Cash Inflows

ReductionReduction

of costsof costs

SalvageSalvage

valuevalue

IncrementalIncremental

revenuesrevenues

Release ofRelease of

workingworking

capitalcapital

Page 12: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Recovery of the Original Investment

Depreciation is not deducted in computing the Depreciation is not deducted in computing the Depreciation is not deducted in computing the Depreciation is not deducted in computing the present value of a project because . . .present value of a project because . . .

It is not a current cash outflow.It is not a current cash outflow.

Discounted cash flow methods automaticallyDiscounted cash flow methods automatically provide for return of the original investment.provide for return of the original investment.

Page 13: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Recovery of the Original Investment

Carver Hospital is considering the purchase of an Carver Hospital is considering the purchase of an

attachment for its Xattachment for its X--ray machine. ray machine.

No investments are to be made unless they have No investments are to be made unless they have

an annual return of at least 10%.an annual return of at least 10%.

Will we be allowed to invest in the attachment?Will we be allowed to invest in the attachment?

Cost $3,170

Life 4 years

Salvage value zero

Increase in annual cash inflows 1,000

Page 14: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Item Year(s)

Amount of

Cash Flow

10%

Factor

Present

Value of

Cash

Flows

Initial investment (outflow) Now (3,170) 1.000 (3,170)

Annual cash inflows 1-4 1,000$ 3.170 3,170$

Net present value $ -0-

Periods 10% 12% 14%

1 0.909 0.893 0.877

2 1.736 1.690 1.647

3 2.487 2.402 2.322

4 3.170 3.037 2.914

5 3.791 3.605 3.433

Present Value of $1

Present valuePresent value

of an annuityof an annuity

of $1 tableof $1 table

Recovery of the Original Investment

Page 15: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Recovery of the Original Investment

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Year

Investment

Outstanding

during the

year

Cash

Inflow

Return on

Investment

(1) 10%

Recover of

Investment

during the

year

(2) - (3)

Unrecovered

Investment at

the end of the

year

(1) - (4)

1 3,170$ 1,000$ 317$ 683$ 2,487$

2 2,487$ 1,000$ 249$ 751$ 1,736$

3 1,736$ 1,000$ 173$ 827$ 909$

4 909$ 1,000$ 91$ 909$ -$

Total investment recovered 3,170$

This implies that the cash inflows are sufficient to recover the $3,170

initial investment (therefore depreciation is unnecessary) and to

provide exactly a 10% return on the investment.

Page 16: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Two Simplifying Assumptions

Two simplifying assumptions are usually made

in net present value analysis:

All cash flows other

than the initial

investment occur at

the end of periods.

All cash flows

generated by an

investment project

are immediately

reinvested at a rate of

return equal to the

discount rate.

Page 17: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Choosing a Discount Rate

•• The firm’sThe firm’s cost of capitalcost of capital

is usually regarded as the is usually regarded as the

minimum required rate of minimum required rate of

return.return.

•• The cost of capital is the The cost of capital is the

average rate of return the average rate of return the

company must pay to its company must pay to its

longlong--term creditors and term creditors and

stockholders for the use of stockholders for the use of

their funds.their funds.

Page 18: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Lester Company has been offered a five year contract

to provide component parts for a large

manufacturer.

Cost and revenue information

Cost of special equipment $160,000

Working capital required 100,000

Relining equipment in 3 years 30,000

Salvage value of equipment in 5 years 5,000

Annual cash revenue and costs:

Sales revenue from parts 750,000

Cost of parts sold 400,000

Salaries, shipping, etc. 270,000

The Net Present Value Method

Page 19: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

•• At the end of five years the working capital At the end of five years the working capital will be released and may be used elsewhere will be released and may be used elsewhere

••

•• At the end of five years the working capital At the end of five years the working capital will be released and may be used elsewhere will be released and may be used elsewhere by Lester.by Lester.

•• Lester Company uses a discount rate of Lester Company uses a discount rate of 10%.10%.

Should the contract be accepted?Should the contract be accepted?

The Net Present Value Method

Page 20: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Annual net cash inflow from operations

Sales revenue 750,000$

Cost of parts sold (400,000)

Salaries, shipping, etc. (270,000)

Annual net cash inflows 80,000$

The Net Present Value Method

Page 21: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Years

Cash

Flows

10%

Factor

Present

Value

Investment in equipment Now $ (160,000) 1.000 (160,000)$

Working capital needed Now (100,000) 1.000 (100,000)

Net present value

The Net Present Value Method

Page 22: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Years

Cash

Flows

10%

Factor

Present

Value

Investment in equipment Now $ (160,000) 1.000 (160,000)$

Working capital needed Now (100,000) 1.000 (100,000)

Annual net cash inflows 1-5 80,000 3.791 303,280

Net present value

The Net Present Value Method

Present value of an annuity of $1 Present value of an annuity of $1

factor for 5 years at 10%.

Page 23: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Years

Cash

Flows

10%

Factor

Present

Value

Investment in equipment Now $ (160,000) 1.000 (160,000)$

Working capital needed Now (100,000) 1.000 (100,000)

Annual net cash inflows 1-5 80,000 3.791 303,280

Relining of equipment 3 (30,000) 0.751 (22,530)

Net present value

Present value of $1

factor for 3 years at 10%.

Present value of $1

factor for 3 years at 10%.

The Net Present Value Method

Page 24: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Years

Cash

Flows

10%

Factor

Present

Value

Investment in equipment Now $ (160,000) 1.000 (160,000)$

Working capital needed Now (100,000) 1.000 (100,000)

Annual net cash inflows 1-5 80,000 3.791 303,280

Relining of equipment 3 (30,000) 0.751 (22,530)

Salvage value of equip. 5 5,000 0.621 3,105

Net present value

Present value of $1

factor for 5 years at 10%.

Present value of $1

factor for 5 years at 10%.

The Net Present Value Method

Page 25: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Years

Cash

Flows

10%

Factor

Present

Value

Investment in equipment Now $ (160,000) 1.000 (160,000)$

Working capital needed Now (100,000) 1.000 (100,000)

Annual net cash inflows 1-5 80,000 3.791 303,280

Relining of equipment 3 (30,000) 0.751 (22,530)

Salvage value of equip. 5 5,000 0.621 3,105

Working capital released 5 100,000 0.621 62,100

Net present value 85,955$

Accept the contract because the project has a positivepositive net present value.

The Net Present Value Method

Page 26: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Quick Check

Denny Associates has been offered a four-year contract to

supply the computing requirements for a local bank.

Cash flow information

Cost of computer equipment $ 250,000

Working capital required 20,000

Upgrading of equipment in 2 years 90,000

Salvage value of equipment in 4 years 10,000

Annual net cash inflow 120,000

• The working capital would be released at the end of the contract.

• Denny Associates requires a 14% return.

Page 27: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Quick Check

What is the net present value of the contract with What is the net present value of the contract with

the local bank?

a. $150,000

b. $ 28,230

c. $ 92,340

d. $132,916

Page 28: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

What is the net present value of the contract with What is the net present value of the contract with

the local bank?

a. $150,000

b. $ 28,230

c. $ 92,340

d. $132,916

Quick Check

Years

Cash

Flows

14%

Factor

Present

Value

Investment in equipment Now $ (250,000) 1.000 (250,000)$

Working capital needed Now (20,000) 1.000 (20,000)

Annual net cash inflows 1-4 120,000 2.914 349,680

Upgrading of equipment 2 (90,000) 0.769 (69,210)

Salvage value of equip. 4 10,000 0.592 5,920

Working capital released 4 20,000 0.592 11,840

Net present value 28,230$

Page 29: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective 2

Evaluate the acceptability Evaluate the acceptability

of an investment project of an investment project

using the internal rate of using the internal rate of

return method.return method.

Page 30: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Internal Rate of Return Method

•• The The internal rate of returninternal rate of return is the rate of returnis the rate of return

promised by an investment project over its promised by an investment project over its

useful life. It is computed by finding the discount useful life. It is computed by finding the discount

rate that will cause the rate that will cause the net present valuenet present value of a of a

project to be project to be zerozero..

•• It works very well if a project’s cash flows are It works very well if a project’s cash flows are

identical every year. If the annual cash flows identical every year. If the annual cash flows

are not identical, a trial and error process must are not identical, a trial and error process must

be used to find the internal rate of return.be used to find the internal rate of return.

Page 31: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Internal Rate of Return Method

General decision rule . . .

If the Internal Rate of Return is . . . Then the Project is . . .

Equal to or greater than the minimum

required rate of return . . . Acceptable.

Less than the minimum required rate

of return . . . Rejected.

When using the internal rate of return,

the cost of capital acts as a hurdle rate

that a project must clear for acceptance.

Page 32: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Internal Rate of Return Method

•• Decker Company can purchase a new Decker Company can purchase a new

••

•• Decker Company can purchase a new Decker Company can purchase a new

machine at a cost of $104,320 that will save machine at a cost of $104,320 that will save

$20,000 per year in cash operating costs. $20,000 per year in cash operating costs.

•• The machine has a 10The machine has a 10--year life.year life.

Page 33: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Internal Rate of Return Method

Future cash flows are the same every year in Future cash flows are the same every year in Future cash flows are the same every year in Future cash flows are the same every year in

this example, so we can calculate the this example, so we can calculate the

internal rate of return as follows:internal rate of return as follows:

Investment required

Net annual cash flows

PV factor for the

internal rate of return =

$104, 320

$20,000 = 5.216

Page 34: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Internal Rate of Return Method

Find the 10-period row, move

5.216. Look at the top of the column

Find the 10-period row, move

across until you find the factor

5.216. Look at the top of the column

and you find a rate of 14%14%.

Periods 10% 12% 14%

1 0.909 0.893 0.877

2 1.736 1.690 1.647

. . . . . . . . . . . .

9 5.759 5.328 4.946

10 6.145 5.650 5.216

Using the present value of an annuity of $1 table . . .

Page 35: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Internal Rate of Return Method

• Decker Company can purchase a new

machine at a cost of $104,320 that will save

$20,000 per year in cash operating costs.

• The machine has a 10-year life.

The internal rate of return internal rate of return on The internal rate of return internal rate of return on

this project is 14%.

If the internal rate of return is equal to or If the internal rate of return is equal to or

greater than the company’s required rate of greater than the company’s required rate of

return, the project is acceptable.return, the project is acceptable.

Page 36: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Quick Check

The expected annual net cash inflow from a project is $22,000 over the next 5 years. The

The expected annual net cash inflow from a project is $22,000 over the next 5 years. The required investment now in the project is $79,310. What is the internal rate of return on the project?

a. 10%

b. 12%

c. 14%

d. Cannot be determined

Page 37: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The expected annual net cash inflow from a project is $22,000 over the next 5 years. The

The expected annual net cash inflow from a project is $22,000 over the next 5 years. The required investment now in the project is $79,310. What is the internal rate of return on the project?

a. 10%

b. 12%

c. 14%

d. Cannot be determined

Quick Check

$79,310/$22,000 = 3.605,

which is the present value factor

for an annuity over five years

when the interest rate is 12%.

Page 38: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Net Present Value vs. Internal Rate of Return

NPV is easier to use.NPV is easier to use.

Questionable assumption:Questionable assumption:

Internal rate of return Internal rate of return

method assumes cash method assumes cash

inflows are reinvested at inflows are reinvested at

the internal rate of return. the internal rate of return.

Page 39: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Net Present Value vs. Internal Rate of Return

NPV is easier to use.NPV is easier to use.

Questionable assumption:Questionable assumption:

Internal rate of return Internal rate of return

method assumes cash method assumes cash

inflows are reinvested at inflows are reinvested at

the internal rate of return. the internal rate of return.

Page 40: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Expanding the Net Present Value Method

To compare competing investment projects we To compare competing investment projects we To compare competing investment projects we To compare competing investment projects we

can use the following net present value can use the following net present value

approaches:approaches:

TotalTotal--costcost

Incremental costIncremental cost

Page 41: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Total-Cost Approach

White Company has two alternatives:White Company has two alternatives:

White Company has two alternatives:White Company has two alternatives: (1) remodel an old car wash or, (1) remodel an old car wash or,

(2) remove it and install a new one.(2) remove it and install a new one.

The company uses a discount rate of 10%.The company uses a discount rate of 10%.

New Car

Wash

Old Car

Wash

Annual revenues 90,000$ 70,000$

Annual cash operating costs 30,000 25,000

Net annual cash inflows 60,000$ 45,000$

Page 42: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Total-Cost Approach

If White installs a new washer . . .If White installs a new washer . . .

Cost $300,000

Productive life 10 years

Salvage value 7,000

Replace brushes at

  the end of 6 years 50,000

Salvage of old equip. 40,000

Let’s look at the present valueLet’s look at the present value

of this alternative.of this alternative.

Page 43: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Total-Cost Approach

If we install the new washer, the If we install the new washer, the If we install the new washer, the If we install the new washer, the

investment will yield a positive net investment will yield a positive net

present value of $83,202.present value of $83,202.

Install the New Washer

Year

Cash

Flows

10%

Factor

Present

Value

Initial investment Now (300,000)$ 1.000 (300,000)$

Replace brushes 6 (50,000) 0.564 (28,200)

Net annual cash inflows 1-10 60,000 6.145 368,700

Salvage of old equipment Now 40,000 1.000 40,000

Salvage of new equipment 10 7,000 0.386 2,702

Net present value 83,202$

Page 44: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Total-Cost Approach

If White remodels the existing washer . . .If White remodels the existing washer . . .

Remodel costs $175,000

Replace brushes at

  the end of 6 years 80,000

Let’s look at the present valueLet’s look at the present value

of this second alternative.of this second alternative.

Page 45: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Total-Cost Approach

If we remodel the existing washer, we will If we remodel the existing washer, we will If we remodel the existing washer, we will If we remodel the existing washer, we will

produce a positive net present value of produce a positive net present value of

$56,405.$56,405.

Remodel the Old Washer

Year

Cash

Flows

10%

Factor

Present

Value

Initial investment Now (175,000)$ 1.000 (175,000)$

Replace brushes 6 (80,000) 0.564 (45,120)

Net annual cash inflows 1-10 45,000 6.145 276,525

Net present value 56,405$

Page 46: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Total-Cost Approach

Both projects yield a positive net Both projects yield a positive net

present value.present value. Net

Present

Value

Invest in new washer 83,202$

Remodel existing washer 56,405

In favor of new washer 26,797$

However, investing in the new washer will However, investing in the new washer will However, investing in the new washer will However, investing in the new washer will

produce a higher net present value than produce a higher net present value than

remodeling the old washer.remodeling the old washer.

Page 47: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Incremental-Cost Approach

Under the incrementalUnder the incremental--cost approach, only cost approach, only

Let’s look at an analysis of the White Company

cost approach.

Under the incrementalUnder the incremental--cost approach, only cost approach, only

those cash flows that differ between the two those cash flows that differ between the two

alternatives are considered.alternatives are considered.

Let’s look at an analysis of the White Company

decision using the incremental-cost approach.

Page 48: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Incremental-Cost Approach

Year

Cash

Flows

10%

Factor

Present

Value

Incremental investment Now $(125,000) 1.000 $(125,000)

Incremental cost of brushes 6 30,000$ 0.564 16,920

Increased net cash inflows 1-10 15,000 6.145 92,175

Salvage of old equipment Now 40,000 1.000 40,000

Salvage of new equipment 10 7,000 0.386 2,702

Net present value $ 26,797

We get the same answer under either theWe get the same answer under either the

totaltotal--cost or incrementalcost or incremental--cost approach.cost approach.

Page 49: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Quick Check

Consider the following alternative projects. Each project

would last for five years.

Project A Project B

Initial investment $80,000 $60,000

Annual net cash inflows 20,000 16,000

Salvage value 10,000 8,000

The company uses a discount rate of 14% to evaluate

projects. Which of the following statements is true?

a. NPV of Project A > NPV of Project B by $5,230

b. NPV of Project B > NPV of Project A by $5,230

c. NPV of Project A > NPV of Project B by $2,000

d. NPV of Project B > NPV of Project A by $2,000

Page 50: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Quick Check

Consider the following alternative projects. Each project

would last for five years.

Project A Project B

Initial investment $80,000 $60,000

Annual net cash inflows 20,000 16,000

Salvage value 10,000 8,000

The company uses a discount rate of 14% to evaluate

projects. Which of the following statements is true?

a. NPV of Project A > NPV of Project B by $5,230

b. NPV of Project B > NPV of Project A by $5,230

c. NPV of Project A > NPV of Project B by $2,000

d. NPV of Project B > NPV of Project A by $2,000

Differences in cash flows Years

Cash

Flows

14%

Factor

Present

Value

Investment in equipment Now $ (20,000) 1.000 (20,000)$

Annual net cash inflows 1-5 4,000 3.433 13,732

Salvage value of equip. 5 2,000 0.519 1,038

Difference in net present value (5,230)$

Page 51: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Least Cost Decisions

In decisions where revenues are not directly In decisions where revenues are not directly In decisions where revenues are not directly In decisions where revenues are not directly

involved, managers should choose the involved, managers should choose the

alternative that has the least total cost from a alternative that has the least total cost from a

present value perspective.present value perspective.

Let’s look at the Home Furniture CompanyLet’s look at the Home Furniture Company..

Page 52: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Least Cost Decisions

Home Furniture Company is trying to decide Home Furniture Company is trying to decide

whether to overhaul an old delivery truck now whether to overhaul an old delivery truck now

Home Furniture Company is trying to decide Home Furniture Company is trying to decide

whether to overhaul an old delivery truck now whether to overhaul an old delivery truck now

or purchase a new one.or purchase a new one.

The company uses a discount rate of 10%.The company uses a discount rate of 10%.

Page 53: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Least Cost Decisions

New Truck

Purchase price 21,000$

Annual operating costs 6,000

Salvage value in 5 years 3,000

Old Truck

Overhaul cost now 4,500$

Annual operating costs 10,000

Salvage value in 5 years 250

Salvage value now 9,000

Here is information about the trucks . . .Here is information about the trucks . . .

Page 54: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Least Cost Decisions

Buy the New Truck

Year

Cash

Flows

10%

Factor

Present

Value

Purchase price Now $ (21,000) 1.000 $ (21,000)

Annual operating costs 1-5 (6,000) 3.791 (22,746)

Salvage value of old truck Now 9,000 1.000 9,000

Salvage value of new truck 5 3,000 0.621 1,863

Net present value (32,883)

Keep the Old Truck

Year

Cash

Flows

10%

Factor

Present

Value

Overhaul cost Now $ (4,500) 1.000 $ (4,500)

Annual operating costs 1-5 (10,000) 3.791 (37,910)

Salvage value of old truck 5 250 0.621 155

Net present value (42,255)

Page 55: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Least Cost Decisions

Home Furniture should purchase the new truck.

Net present value of costs

associated with purchase

of new truck (32,883)$

Net present value of costs

associated with remodeling

existing truck (42,255)

Net present value in favor of

purchasing the new truck 9,372$

Page 56: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Quick Check

Bay Architects is considering a drafting machine Bay Architects is considering a drafting machine Bay Architects is considering a drafting machine Bay Architects is considering a drafting machine

that would cost $100,000, last four years, and that would cost $100,000, last four years, and

provide annual cash savings of $10,000 and provide annual cash savings of $10,000 and

considerable intangible benefits each year. How considerable intangible benefits each year. How

large (in cash terms) would the intangible benefits large (in cash terms) would the intangible benefits

have to be per year to justify investing in the have to be per year to justify investing in the

machine if the discount rate is 14%?machine if the discount rate is 14%?

a. $15,000a. $15,000

b. $90,000b. $90,000

c. $24,317c. $24,317

d. $60,000d. $60,000

Page 57: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Quick Check

Bay Architects is considering a drafting machine Bay Architects is considering a drafting machine Bay Architects is considering a drafting machine Bay Architects is considering a drafting machine

that would cost $100,000, last four years, and that would cost $100,000, last four years, and

provide annual cash savings of $10,000 and provide annual cash savings of $10,000 and

considerable intangible benefits each year. How considerable intangible benefits each year. How

large (in cash terms) would the intangible benefits large (in cash terms) would the intangible benefits

have to be per year to justify investing in the have to be per year to justify investing in the

machine if the discount rate is 14%?machine if the discount rate is 14%?

a. $15,000a. $15,000

b. $90,000b. $90,000

c. $24,317c. $24,317

d. $60,000d. $60,000

Years

Cash

Flows

14%

Factor

Present

Value

Investment in machine Now $ (100,000) 1.000 (100,000)$

Annual net cash inflows 1-4 10,000 2.914 29,140

Annual intangible benefits 1-4 ? 2.914 ?

Net present value (70,860)$

$70,860$70,860//2.914 = $24,3172.914 = $24,317

Years

Cash

Flows

14%

Factor

Present

Value

Investment in machine Now $ (100,000) 1.000 (100,000)$

Annual net cash inflows 1-4 10,000 2.914 29,140

Annual intangible benefits 1-4 24,317 2.914 70,860

Net present value (0)$

Page 58: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective 3

Evaluate an investment Evaluate an investment

project that has uncertain project that has uncertain

cash flows.cash flows.

Page 59: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Uncertain Cash Flows – An Example

Assume that all of the cash flows related to an Assume that all of the cash flows related to an

Assume that all of the cash flows related to an Assume that all of the cash flows related to an

investment in a supertanker have been estimated, investment in a supertanker have been estimated,

except for its salvage value in 20 years.except for its salvage value in 20 years.

Using a discount rate of 12%, management has Using a discount rate of 12%, management has

determined that the net present value of all the determined that the net present value of all the

cash flows, except the salvage value is a negative cash flows, except the salvage value is a negative

$1.04 million.$1.04 million.

How large would the salvage value need to be to

make this investment attractive?

Page 60: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Uncertain Cash Flows – An Example

Net present value to be offset 1,040,000$

Present value factor 0.104= 10,000,000$

This equation can be used to determine that

if the salvage value of the supertanker is at

least $10,000,000, the net present value of the

investment would be positive and therefore

acceptable.

Page 61: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Real Options

Delay the start of

a project

Expand a project

if conditions are

favorable

Cut losses if

conditions are

unfavorable

The ability to consider these real options adds value to many

investments. The value of these options can be quantified using

what is called real options analysis, which is beyond the scope of

the book.

Page 62: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective 4

Rank investment projects Rank investment projects

in order of preference.in order of preference.

Page 63: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Preference Decision – The Ranking of

Investment Projects

Screening Decisions

Pertain to whether or

not some proposed

investment is

acceptable; these

decisions come first.

Preference Decisions

Attempt to rank

acceptable

alternatives from the

most to least

appealing.

Page 64: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Internal Rate of Return Method

The higher the internal

rate of return, the

more desirable the

project.

When using the internal rate of return

method to rank competing investment

projects, the preference rule is:

Page 65: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Net Present Value Method

The net present value of one project cannot

be directly compared to the net present

value of another project unless the

investments are equal.

Page 66: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Ranking Investment Projects

Profitability Present value of cash inflows

index Investment required =

A B

Present value of cash inflows $81,000 $6,000

Investment required 80,000 5,000

Profitability index 1.01 1.20

Investment

The higher the profitability index, theThe higher the profitability index, the

more desirable the project.more desirable the project.

Page 67: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Other Approaches to

Capital Budgeting Decisions

Other methods of making capital budgeting Other methods of making capital budgeting Other methods of making capital budgeting Other methods of making capital budgeting

decisions include . . .decisions include . . .

The Payback Method.The Payback Method.

Simple Rate of Return.Simple Rate of Return.

Page 68: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective 5

Determine the payback Determine the payback

period for an investment.period for an investment.

Page 69: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Payback Method

The The payback periodpayback period is the length of time that it is the length of time that it

takes for a project to recover its initial cost takes for a project to recover its initial cost

When the net annual cash inflow is the same each When the net annual cash inflow is the same each

The The payback periodpayback period is the length of time that it is the length of time that it

takes for a project to recover its initial cost takes for a project to recover its initial cost

out of the cash receipts that it generates.out of the cash receipts that it generates.

When the net annual cash inflow is the same each When the net annual cash inflow is the same each

year, this formula can be used to compute the year, this formula can be used to compute the

payback period:payback period:

Payback period =

Investment required

Net annual cash inflow

Page 70: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Payback Method

Management at The Daily Grind wants to install an Management at The Daily Grind wants to install an

Management requires a payback period of 5 years or Management requires a payback period of 5 years or

Management at The Daily Grind wants to install an Management at The Daily Grind wants to install an

espresso bar in its restaurant.espresso bar in its restaurant.

The espresso bar:The espresso bar:

1.1. Costs $140,000 and has a 10Costs $140,000 and has a 10--year life.year life.

2.2. Will generate net annual cash inflows of $35,000.Will generate net annual cash inflows of $35,000.

Management requires a payback period of 5 years or Management requires a payback period of 5 years or

less on all investments.less on all investments.

What is the payback period for the espresso bar?What is the payback period for the espresso bar?

Page 71: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Payback Method

Payback period = Payback period = Investment required Investment required

Net annual cash inflowNet annual cash inflow

Payback period = Payback period = $140,000 $140,000

$35,000$35,000

Payback period = Payback period = 4.0 years4.0 years

According to the company’s criterion, According to the company’s criterion, According to the company’s criterion, According to the company’s criterion,

management would invest in the management would invest in the

espresso bar because its payback espresso bar because its payback

period is less than 5 years.period is less than 5 years.

Page 72: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Quick Check

Consider the following two investments:

Consider the following two investments:

Project X Project Y

Initial investment $100,000 $100,000

Year 1 cash inflow $60,000 $60,000

Year 2 cash inflow $40,000 $35,000

Year 3-10 cash inflows $0 $25,000

Which project has the shortest payback period?

a. Project X

b. Project Y

c. Cannot be determined

Page 73: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Consider the following two investments:

Consider the following two investments:

Project X Project Y

Initial investment $100,000 $100,000

Year 1 cash inflow $60,000 $60,000

Year 2 cash inflow $40,000 $35,000

Year 3-10 cash inflows $0 $25,000

Which project has the shortest payback period?

a. Project X

b. Project Y

c. Cannot be determined

Quick Check

•• Project X has a payback period of 2 years.Project X has a payback period of 2 years.

•• Project Y has a payback period of slightly more than 2 years.Project Y has a payback period of slightly more than 2 years.

•• Which project do you think is better?Which project do you think is better?

Page 74: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Evaluation of the Payback Method

Ignores the Ignores the

time valuetime value

of money.of money.

Ignores cashIgnores cash

flows after flows after

the paybackthe payback

period.period.

ShortShort--comingscomings

of the paybackof the payback

period.period.

Page 75: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Evaluation of the Payback Method

Serves as Serves as

screening screening

tool.tool.

Identifies Identifies

investments that investments that

recoup cash recoup cash

investments investments

quickly.quickly. Identifies Identifies

products that products that

recoup initial recoup initial

investment investment

quickly.quickly.

StrengthsStrengths

of the paybackof the payback

period.period.

Page 76: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Payback and Uneven Cash Flows

11 22 33 44 55

$1,000$1,000 $0$0 $2,000$2,000 $1,000$1,000 $500$500

When the cash flows associated with an

investment project change from year to year,

the payback formula introduced earlier cannot

be used.

Instead, the un-recovered investment must be

tracked year by year.

Page 77: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Payback and Uneven Cash Flows

11 22 33 44 55

$1,000$1,000 $0$0 $2,000$2,000 $1,000$1,000 $500$500

For example, if a project requires an initial

investment of $4,000 and provides uneven net

cash inflows in years 1-5 as shown, the

investment would be fully recovered in year 4.

Page 78: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective 6

Compute the simple rate Compute the simple rate

of return for an of return for an

investment.investment.

Page 79: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Simple Rate of Return Method

• Does not focus on cash flows -- rather it

focuses on accounting net operating incomeaccounting net operating income.

• The following formula is used to calculate the

simple rate of return:

Simple rateSimple rate

of returnof return ==

Annual incremental net operating income Annual incremental net operating income --

Initial investmentInitial investment**

**Should be reduced by any salvage from the sale of the old equipment

Page 80: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Simple Rate of Return Method

Management of The Daily Grind wants to install

Management of The Daily Grind wants to install

an espresso bar in its restaurant.

The espresso bar:

1. Cost $140,000 and has a 10-year life.

2. Will generate incremental revenues of $100,000

and incremental expenses of $65,000 including

depreciation.

What is the simple rate of return on the

investment project?

Page 81: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Simple Rate of Return Method

Simple rateSimple rate

of returnof return

$35,000 $35,000

$140,000$140,000 = 25%= 25% ==

Page 82: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Criticism of the Simple Rate of Return

Ignores the Ignores the

time valuetime value

of money.of money.

The same project The same project

may appear may appear

desirable in some desirable in some

years and years and

undesirable undesirable

in other years.in other years.

ShortShort--comingscomings

of the simple of the simple

rate of return.rate of return.

Page 83: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Postaudit of Investment Projects

A postaudit is a followA postaudit is a follow--up after the project has up after the project has A postaudit is a followA postaudit is a follow--up after the project has up after the project has

been completed to see whether or not been completed to see whether or not

expected results were actually realized.expected results were actually realized.

Page 84: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Concept of Present Value

Appendix 14A

Page 85: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective 7

(Appendix 14A)(Appendix 14A)

Understand present value Understand present value

concepts and the use of concepts and the use of

present value tables.present value tables.

Page 86: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Mathematics of Interest

A dollar received

today is worth more

than a dollar received

a year from now

because you can put

it in the bank today

and have more than a

dollar a year from

now.

Page 87: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Mathematics of Interest – An Example

Assume a bank pays 8% interest on a

$100 deposit made today. How much

will the $100 be worth in one year?

FFnn = P(1 + r)= P(1 + r)nn

Page 88: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Mathematics of Interest – An Example

Assume a bank pays 8% interest on a

$100 deposit made today. How much

will the $100 be worth in one year?

FFnn = P(1 + r)= P(1 + r)nn

FFnn = $100(1 + .08)= $100(1 + .08)11

FFnn = $108.00= $108.00

Page 89: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Compound Interest – An Example

FFnn = P(1 + r)= P(1 + r)nn

What if the $108 was left in the bank for a What if the $108 was left in the bank for a

second year? How much would the second year? How much would the

original $100 be worth at the end of the original $100 be worth at the end of the

second year? second year?

Page 90: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Compound Interest – An Example

The interest that is paid in the second year on the interest earned in the first year is known as

compound interest.

FFnn = $100(1 + .08)= $100(1 + .08)22

FFnn = $116.64= $116.64

Page 91: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Computation of Present Value

Present

Value

Future

Value

An investment can be viewed in two

ways—its future value or its present

value.

Let’s look at a situation where the

future value is known and the present

value is the unknown.

Page 92: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Present Value – An Example

If a bond will pay $100 in two years, what If a bond will pay $100 in two years, what

is the present value of the $100 if an is the present value of the $100 if an

investor can earn a return of 12% on investor can earn a return of 12% on

investments?investments?

(1 + r)(1 + r)nn P =P =

FFnn

Page 93: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Present Value – An Example

This process is called discounting. We have discounted the $100 to its present value of $79.72. The interest rate used to find the present value is

called the discount rate.

(1 + .12)(1 + .12)22 P =P =

$100$100

P =P = $79.72$79.72

Page 94: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Present Value – An Example

Let’s verify that if we put $79.72 in the bank Let’s verify that if we put $79.72 in the bank

today at 12% interest that it would grow to $100 today at 12% interest that it would grow to $100

at the end of two years.at the end of two years.

Year 1 Year 2

Beginning balance 79.72$ 89.29$

Interest @ 12% 9.57$ 10.71$

Ending balance 89.29$ 100.00$

If $79.72 is put in the bank today and earns If $79.72 is put in the bank today and earns If $79.72 is put in the bank today and earns If $79.72 is put in the bank today and earns

12%, it will be worth $100 in two years.12%, it will be worth $100 in two years.

Page 95: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Rate

Periods 10% 12% 14%

1 0.909 0.893 0.877

2 0.826 0.797 0.769

3 0.751 0.712 0.675

4 0.683 0.636 0.592

5 0.621 0.567 0.519

Present Value – An Example

$100 $100 ×× 0.797 = $79.70 present value0.797 = $79.70 present value

Present value factor of $1 for 2 periods at 12%.Present value factor of $1 for 2 periods at 12%. Present value factor of $1 for 2 periods at 12%.Present value factor of $1 for 2 periods at 12%.

Page 96: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Quick Check

How much would you have to put in the bank today How much would you have to put in the bank today

to have $100 at the end of five years if the interest

rate is 10%?

a. $62.10

b. $56.70

c. $90.90

d. $51.90

Page 97: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

How much would you have to put in the bank today How much would you have to put in the bank today

to have $100 at the end of five years if the interest

rate is 10%?

a. $62.10

b. $56.70

c. $90.90

d. $51.90

Quick Check

$100 $100 0.621 = $62.100.621 = $62.10

Page 98: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Present Value of a Series of Cash Flows

11 22 33 44 55 66

$100$100 $100$100 $100$100 $100$100 $100$100 $100$100

An investment that involves a series of

identical cash flows at the end of each

year is called an annuityannuity.

Page 99: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Present Value of a Series of Cash Flows –

An Example

Lacey Inc. purchased a tract of land on which

a $60,000 payment will be due each year for

the next five years. What is the present

value of this stream of cash payments when

the discount rate is 12%?

Page 100: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Present Value of a Series of Cash Flows –

An Example

We could solve the problem like this . . .

Periods 10% 12% 14%

1 0.909 0.893 0.877

2 1.736 1.690 1.647

3 2.487 2.402 2.322

4 3.170 3.037 2.914

5 3.791 3.605 3.433

Present Value of an Annuity of $1

$60,000 $60,000 ×× 3.605 = $216,3003.605 = $216,300

Page 101: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Quick Check

If the interest rate is 14%, how much would you If the interest rate is 14%, how much would you

have to put in the bank today so as to be able to

withdraw $100 at the end of each of the next five

years?

a. $34.33

b. $500.00

c. $343.30

d. $360.50

Page 102: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

If the interest rate is 14%, how much would you If the interest rate is 14%, how much would you

have to put in the bank today so as to be able to

withdraw $100 at the end of each of the next five

years?

a. $34.33

b. $500.00

c. $343.30

d. $360.50

Quick Check

$100 $100 3.433 = $343.303.433 = $343.30

Page 103: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Income Taxes in Capital

Budgeting Decisions

Appendix 14C

Page 104: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective 8

(Appendix 14C)(Appendix 14C)

Include income taxes in a Include income taxes in a

capital budgeting analysis.capital budgeting analysis.

Page 105: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Simplifying Assumptions

Taxable income

equals net

income as

computed for

financial reports.

The tax rate is a

flat percentage of

taxable income.

Page 106: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Concept of After-tax Cost

After-tax cost

(net cash outflow)= (1-Tax rate) Tax-deductible cash expense

An expenditure net of its tax effect is

known as after-tax cost.

Here is the equation for determining the

after-tax cost of any tax-deductible cash

expense:

Page 107: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

After-tax Cost – An Example

Assume a company with a 30% tax rate is

contemplating investing in a training program

that will cost $60,000 per year.

We can use this equation to determine that the

after-tax cost of the training program is

$42,000.

After-tax cost

(net cash outflow)= (1-Tax rate) Tax-deductible cash expense

$42,000 = (1 - .30) $60,000

Page 108: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

After-tax Cost – An Example

The answer can also be determined by

calculating the taxable income and income tax

for two alternatives—without the training

program and with the training program.

The after-tax cost of

the training program is

the same—$42,000.

Page 109: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

After-tax Cost – An Example

After-tax benefit

(net cash inflow)= (1-Tax rate) Taxable cash receipt

The amount of net cash inflow

realized from a taxable cash

receipt after income tax effects

have been considered is known

as the after-tax benefit.

Page 110: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Depreciation Tax Shield

While depreciation is not a cash

flow, it does affect the taxes that

must be paid and therefore has

an indirect effect on a

company’s cash flows.

Tax savings from

the depreciation

tax shield

= Tax rate Depreciation deduction

Page 111: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Depreciation Tax Shield – An Example

Assume a company has annual cash sales and

cash operating expenses of $500,000 and

$310,000, respectively; a depreciable asset,

with no salvage value, on which the annual

straight-line depreciation expense is $90,000;

and a 30% tax rate.

Tax savings from

the depreciation

tax shield

= Tax rate Depreciation deduction

Page 112: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Depreciation Tax Shield – An Example

Assume a company has annual cash sales and

cash operating expenses of $500,000 and

$310,000, respectively; a depreciable asset,

with no salvage value, on which the annual

straight-line depreciation expense is $90,000;

and a 30% tax rate.

Tax savings from

the depreciation

tax shield

= Tax rate Depreciation deduction

$27,000 = .30 $90,000

The depreciation tax shield is $27,000.

Page 113: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Depreciation Tax Shield – An Example

The answer can also be determined by

calculating the taxable income and income tax

for two alternatives—without the depreciation

deduction and with the depreciation deduction.

The depreciation tax

shield is the same—

$27,000.

Page 114: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Holland Company – An Example

Holland Company owns the mineral Holland Company owns the mineral rights to land that has a deposit of ore. rights to land that has a deposit of ore. The company is deciding whether to The company is deciding whether to

purchase equipment and open a mine purchase equipment and open a mine on the property. The mine would be on the property. The mine would be depleted and closed in 10 years and depleted and closed in 10 years and the equipment would be sold for its the equipment would be sold for its

salvage value.salvage value.

More information is provided on the next slide.

Page 115: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Holland Company – An Example

Cost of equipment $ 300,000

Working capital needed $ 75,000

Estimated annual cash

receipts from ore sales

$ 250,000

Estimated annual cash

expenses for mining ore $ 170,000

Cost of road repairs

needed in 6 years $ 40,000

Salvage value of the

equipment in 10 years $ 100,000

After-tax cost of capital 12%

Tax rate 30%

Should Should

Holland open Holland open

a mine on a mine on

the property?the property?

Page 116: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Holland Company – An Example

Cash receipts from ore sales 250,000$

Less cash expenses for mining ore 170,000

Net cash receipts 80,000$

Step One: Compute the net annual cash Step One: Compute the net annual cash receipts from operating the mine.receipts from operating the mine.

Page 117: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Holland Company – An Example

Step Two: Identify all relevant cash flows Step Two: Identify all relevant cash flows as shown.as shown.

Holland Company

(1) (2)

Items and Computations Year Amount

Cost of new equipment Now (300,000)$

Working capital needed Now (75,000)$

Net annual cash receipts 1-10 80,000$

Road repairs 6 (40,000)$

Annual depreciation deductions 1-10 30,000$

Salvage value of equipment 10 100,000$

Release of working capital 10 75,000$

Net present value

Page 118: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Holland Company – An Example

Step Three: Translate the relevant cash Step Three: Translate the relevant cash flows to afterflows to after--tax cash flows as shown.tax cash flows as shown.

Holland Company

(1) (2) (3) (4)

Items and Computations Year Amount

Tax

Effect

(1) (2)

After-Tax

Cash Flows

Cost of new equipment Now (300,000)$ 0 $ (300,000)

Working capital needed Now (75,000)$ 0 $ (75,000)

Net annual cash receipts 1-10 80,000$ 1-.30 $ 56,000

Road repairs 6 (40,000)$ 1-.30 $ (28,000)

Annual depreciation deductions 1-10 30,000$ .30 9,000$

Salvage value of equipment 10 100,000$ 1-.30 70,000$

Release of working capital 10 75,000$ 0 75,000$

Net present value

Page 119: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Holland Company – An Example

Step Four: Discount all cash flows to Step Four: Discount all cash flows to their present value as shown.their present value as shown.

Holland Company

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

Items and Computations Year Amount

Tax

Effect

(1) (2)

After-Tax

Cash Flows

12%

Factor

Present

Value

Cost of new equipment Now (300,000)$ 0 $ (300,000) 1.000 $ (300,000)

Working capital needed Now (75,000)$ 0 $ (75,000) 1.000 (75,000)

Net annual cash receipts 1-10 80,000$ 1-.30 $ 56,000 5.650 316,400

Road repairs 6 (40,000)$ 1-.30 $ (28,000) 0.507 (14,196)

Annual depreciation deductions 1-10 30,000$ .30 9,000$ 5.650 50,850

Salvage value of equipment 10 100,000$ 1-.30 70,000$ 0.322 22,540

Release of working capital 10 75,000$ 0 75,000$ 0.322 24,150

Net present value $ 24,744

Page 120: Capital Budgeting Decisions - NELY BACHSIN BLOG · PDF fileTypical Capital Budgeting Decisions Plant expansion Equipment selection Equipment replacement Lease or buy Cost reduction

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

End of Chapter 14