capital environment initiation of coverage emerging …...the hazardous waste treatment and...
TRANSCRIPT
1
9 August 2017
Capital Environment – Initiation of Coverage CLEAN & GREEN
Emerging player in solid waste treatment BUY
Capital Environment Holdings Limited (“CEHL”) is a leading solid waste
management operator in China with a strong brand. It has 39 projects on hand with
attributable daily capacity of about 17.6k tons, of which about 2.7k tons are
currently in operation. We expect the company is going to experience a high
growth period in FY17-19E, as the operating capacity is expected to grow at a
CAGR of 73.5%, which we believe will result in its earnings taking off in FY18. We
initiate a BUY on CEHL with a target price of HKD0.40, based on 15.0x FY18 forward
PE valuation, implying a 33% upside potential.
74.2% CAGR revenue growth from domestic projects – Having a strong foothold in the
waste-to-energy business, CEHL has expanded its service coverage to the more
profitable hazardous waste and organic waste treatment business. Supported by its
accelerated progress of domestic projects and substantial increment in daily operating
capacity, we expect the domestic segment would fuel a CAGR of 74.2% in revenue to
about RMB3.2bn, constituting about 56% of FY19E’s revenue.
Strong brand to acquire high quality assets – CEHL has built up a strong brand and
reputation in aspects of both technical expertise and extensive network backed by its
parent Beijing Capital Group. It has advanced waste treatment technologies and its parent
has maintained a decent track record in environmental projects operation, which is
favorable for acquiring new projects and high quality assets. Last year, CEHL acquired a
51% interest in the largest urban waste operator BCG NZ from its parent, which is
expected to contribute some RMB182mn in profit in FY18E. Should CEHL consider
acquiring the remaining 49% stake in the future, it would further deliver an additional profit
of about RMB175mn, representing 52% of its attributable profit in FY18E.
Well-financed expansion plan – Anticipating the incremental capacity costs of about
RMB300k/ton, its annual Capex is estimated to be about RMB1.2bn. With PPP model
adopted in the projects and strong support from its parent, CEHL is capable of financing
its robust business expansion plan at a low funding cost of around 5%. We expect that
CEHL will further increase its net gearing to about 105% by FY18E, after which the Capex
required could be well financed by its internal resources.
Risk Factors – Execution of expansion plan; delay in greenfield projects construction;
change in government policies; devaluation of the NZD.
Key Financials – Fiscal Year Ended 31 Dec
(RMB’mn) FY15* FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E Revenue 2,639 2,708 3,604 4,874 5,707
Growth (%) 2.6% 33.1% 35.2% 17.1% Operating profit 405 361 596 946 1,173
Growth (%) -10.7% 64.9% 58.7% 24.0% Attributable profit 158 44 113 334 478
Growth (%) -72.2% 158.8% 194.3% 43.0% CAGR FY17-19E 121.7% EPS (RMB fen) 1.29 0.31 0.79 2.34 3.34 P/E (x) 18.9 79.4 30.7 10.4 7.3 P/B (x) 0.93 1.12 1.11 1.01 0.90 Dividend Yield (%) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Recommendation
Ticker 3989 HK
Quam's Rating BUY
Last Close HK$0.30
Target Price HK$0.40
Previous Target N/A
Up/(Down)side 33%
Previous Rating Initial Coverage
Share Information
52-week range (HK$) 0.20 – 0.33
ADT (3M) (HK$’mn) 2.06
Market Cap. (HK$’mn) 4,288.4
Shares outstanding (‘mn) 14,294.7
Free float 31.6%
SH-HK Stock Connect No
SZ-HK Stock Connect No
Major Shareholders
Beijing Capital Group Co. Ltd 66.9%
Share Price Performance
Source: Bloomberg
Li Yiming, Eric
: +852 2971 5433
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 2
Table of Contents 1. Investment Highlights .......................................................................................................................................... 3
2. Valuation and Comparables ............................................................................................................................... 5
3. Business Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Accelerated contribution from domestic segments ................................................................................................. 7
3.2 Strong brand for acquiring new projects .................................................................................................................. 14
3.3 Well-funded business expansion plan ......................................................................................................................... 15
3.4 Sound synergy from BCG NZ ........................................................................................................................................... 16
4. Industry Outlook ................................................................................................................................................. 17
4.1 Solid waste industry starting to drive revenue ....................................................................................................... 17
4.2 Waste-to-energy sector in China ................................................................................................................................... 19
4.3 Expanding demand on solid waste treatment ....................................................................................................... 20
5. Financial Analysis ............................................................................................................................................... 22
5.1 Revenue breakdown ........................................................................................................................................................... 22
5.2 Profitability ............................................................................................................................................................................ 23
5.3 Financial position ................................................................................................................................................................ 24
5.4 Operating efficiency ............................................................................................................................................................ 25
6. Company Background ....................................................................................................................................... 26
6.1 Key milestones ....................................................................................................................................................................... 26
6.2 Strong support from Beijing Capital Group ............................................................................................................. 27
6.3 Shareholding structure ..................................................................................................................................................... 28
6.4 Financial statements .......................................................................................................................................................... 29
Appendix: The existing solid waste treatment projects .................................................................................. 30
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 3
1. Investment Highlights
74.2% CAGR revenue growth from domestic market – CEHL has secured 39
domestic projects with attributable daily capacity of about 17.6k tons, of which about
2.7k tons are currently in operation. It has implemented its mature business model
as well as technical expertise in its core waste-to-energy treatment business, which
delivers stable income streams from both government subsidies and electricity sales
during the long concession period. Riding on the two successful waste-to-energy
projects, CEHL has been accelerating the construction progress of other committed
projects, attempting to replicate its success nationwide. Looking ahead, we expect a
CAGR of 74.2% in revenue contributed from domestic projects in FY17-19E,
supported by a 73.5% YoY growth of attributable daily operating capacity during the
period, reaching about 13.9k tons by FY19E.
Stable profit contribution from BCG NZ – CEHL acquired a 51% interest in the
largest urban waste management operator in New Zealand (“BCG NZ”) from its
parent company Beijing Capital Group in 2016, where BCG NZ retains over 30% of
market shares. BCG NZ has optimized its business and we expect it will contribute
to an attributable profit of about RMB182mn in FY18E. It does not only deliver stable
profit to the company, but also brings in practical experience in project operation and
integration. Previously, Beijing Capital acquired the entire interests of TPI NZ at
consideration of about NZD950mn and renamed it to BCG NZ. If CEHL were to
consider acquisition of the remaining 49% interest in BCG NZ from its parent, a
RMB175mn profit increment is expected, representing 52% of its attributable in
FY18E.
Lucrative GPM from new treatment technologies – In addition to its waste-to
energy treatment business, CEHL also introduced two new treatment technologies
with higher GPM in its service coverage, which will further improve its overall
profitability. The hazardous waste treatment and anaerobic treatment technology is
capable of achieving an excellent gross profit margin of about 60% and 25%
respectively with high treatment tariff. We anticipate revenue contribution from
anaerobic and hazardous waste treatment would commence in FY17-18E. Going
forward, we expect anaerobic and hazardous waste treatment attributable daily
capacity would reach about 3,688 tons and 1,608 tons respectively by FY21E,
representing a CAGR of 17% and 59% respectively during the period.
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 4
Strong brand to acquire high quality assets – CEHL has built up its strong brand
nationwide in the aspects of waste treatment technology as well as extensive
network backed by its parent company Beijing Capital Group. Supported by its
comprehensive solid waste treatment technologies, CEHL is capable of providing
services for all kinds of solid waste while controlling the operating costs with
advanced incineration technology from Japan. Given the reputation and extensive
network of Beijing Capital Group, which has already achieved success in wastewater
treatment business, CEHL could further expand its business via acquiring high
quality projects and assets on a larger scale.
Well-financed expansion plan with healthy financial position – Anticipating an
incremental capacity costs of about RMB300k/ton, we expect CEHL’s annual Capex
would be about RMB1.2bn given its robust expansion plan of reaching 21.9k tons by
FY21E. With the PPP models implemented in the projects as well as strong support
from its parent company, CEHL is capable of fulfilling the Capex requirements with
finance costs as low as around 5% during the period. It is estimated that the company
will further increase its net gearing to 105% by FY18E, after which its Capex could
be supported by its internal resources.
Key risks
(1) The execution of business expansion plan;
(2) Delay in construction of domestic projects;
(3) Change in government policies;
(4) Devaluation in NZD.
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 5
2. Valuation and Comparables
We initiate a BUY on CEHL with a target price of HKD0.40, based on 15.0x 2018
forward P/E on a fully diluted basis, implying a 33% upside potential. Anticipating
high revenue growth from waste-to-energy, anaerobic and hazardous waste
treatment, our target price represents about 10.4x FY19 forward PE.
Our target valuation is acquired from a comparable approach with other solid waste
operators in China. The companies in the sector are currently trading between 6.9
and 14.2x FY18 consensus P/E with an average of 11.0x PE. Compared with the
peers, CEHL is presenting a high growth potential in both its revenue and profit given
its accelerated progress of its domestic projects, as well as its ability in acquiring
new projects leveraging its strong brand and extensive network. The company is
expected to achieve a substantial growth in attributable profit to RMB478mn in FY19,
representing a CAGR of about 122% in FY17-19E.
Hence, considering the overall business expansion plan, profitability improvement
and expected earnings growth, we believe that CEHL should deserve a relatively
higher valuation of 15.0x FY18 forward P/E.
Figure 1. Valuation of CEHL
Company Ticker Closing Price
(HKD)
FY18E EPS
(HKD)
FY18E P/E
(x)
FY17E-19E
EPS (CAGR)
Capital Environment 3989 0.30 0.269 15.0 122%
Peer Group
China EB Int’l 257 10.36 0.903 11.5 18%
New Universe Environment 436 0.48 0.050 9.6 43%
Dongjiang Environment 895 10.50 0.818 12.8 11%
Dynagreen Environment 1330 4.20 0.604 6.9 19%
Canvest Environment 1381 4.34 0.306 14.2 45%
Peers range 6.9 – 14.2
Source: Bloomberg, Quam Securities
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 6
Figure 2. Peer Comparison Table
Last Price
Market Cap
P/E
Div Yield
Trailing 12 mth
EV / EBITDA GPM
Net Margin
EPS Growth
Hist Current Next P/B T/O Net
Profit ROE ROA
Company Name Ticker (HK$) (HK$'bn) (x) (x) (x) (x) (%) ('mn) ('mn) (x) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Currency
CAPITAL ENV 3989 HK 0.30 4.22 80.0 30.9 10.6 1.2 4.1 3,098 56 13.0 29.4 1.6 (76.0) 1.6 3.5 HKD
Peer Group
CHINA EVERBR INT 257 HK 10.36 46.44 16.7 13.5 11.5 2.7 2.0 13,971 2,785 11.4 38.0 19.9 33.6 16.6 10.4 HKD
NEW UNIVERSE ENV 436 HK 0.48 1.46 28.0 15.5 9.6 2.0 - 291 51 21.8 45.5 19.4 37.3 7.3 7.5 HKD
DONGJIANG ENV-H 895 HK 10.50 14.69 14.6 15.7 12.8 2.4 1.3 2,579 534 16.2 35.2 20.7 59.0 12.6 6.7 CNY
DYNAGREEN ENVI-H 1330 HK 4.20 4.39 10.5 8.1 6.9 1.4 1.7 1,874 356 8.4 - 19.0 54.5 13.8 9.6 CNY
CANVEST ENV 1381 HK 4.34 10.66 21.9 17.9 14.2 3.2 0.6 1,654 400 13.6 35.6 24.2 45.6 15.8 10.4 HKD
Simple Average 18.3 14.2 11.0 2.3 1.4 38.6 20.7 46.0
Source: Bloomberg
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 7
3. Business Overview
3.1 Accelerated contribution from domestic segments
CEHL is the solid waste treatment listed platform of Beijing Capital Group. It is
primarily engaged in a wide range of waste management services in China, including
waste collection and transfer, waste-to-energy, landfill, anaerobic treatment for
organic waste, hazardous waste treatment and dismantling services of electrical
appliances. It acquired a 51% interest in BCG NZ from its parent in Sep 2016.
Currently, the urban waste treatment accounts for about 78% of its total revenue.
Looking ahead, the company will kick start its domestic expansion plan in the waste-
to-energy segment. We expect that the company would achieve a substantial
revenue growth with a CAGR of 74.2% in the domestic segment in FY17-19E,
reaching about RMB3.2bn by FY19E, or 56% of its total revenue.
Figure 3. Revenue breakdown of CEHL
Source: Company data, Quam Securities. Data in FY15 is restated.
Furthermore, we believe there is a chance that the remaining 49% interest in BCG
NZ currently held by the parent group could be injected in the future. In FY18E, the
projected attributable profit of BCG NZ is about RMB182mn. Thus, the remaining
stake could provide an additional RMB175mn profit to the company, representing
52% of FY18E’s attributable profit.
1,960 2,101
2,248 2,383
2,502 2,602 2,706
680 607
1,356
2,491
3,205
3,796
4,400
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
2015* 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
BCG NZ Domestic Projects
Rev
enu
e(R
MB
mill
ion
)
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 8
Figure 4. Segment revenue contribution in FY17E and FY18E
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
CEHL has formulated a robust business plan for its domestic projects. A total of 31
waste treatment projects are expected to be in operation by FY19 compared to the
current five. The waste-to-energy treatment sector, the company’s core revenue
driver, is expected to triple its current size to about 6,000 tons in operating capacity
by FY18. The anaerobic treatment and hazardous waste treatment business would
complete construction and a combined 2,300 tons of capacity would go into
operation in FY19. Going forward, we expect the company’s aggregate daily
operating capacity would achieve a CAGR of 45% in FY17-19E, reaching about
21.9k tons by FY21E.
Figure 5. Forecast of daily operating capacity of CEHL’s domestic projects
Segments Current FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E FY21E
Anaerobic / 400 tons 1,200 tons 1,600 tons 2,000 tons 2,400 tons
Waste-to-energy 1,800 tons 2,766 tons 6,000 tons 8,000 tons 10,000 tons 12,000 tons
Collection and transfer 724 tons 724 tons 1,500 tons 2,400 tons 3,600 tons 4,800 tons
Landfill 874 tons 874 tons 1,000 tons 1,200 tons 1,400 tons 1,600 tons
Hazardous Waste / / 400 tons 700 tons 900 tons 1,100 tons
Total 3,398 tons 4,764 tons 10,100 tons 13,900 tons 17,900 tons 21,900 tons
Dismantling 3.2mn units 3.2mn units 3.2mn units 3.2mn units 3.2mn units 3.2mn units
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
BCG NZ, 62.4%
Construction, 20.8%
Anaerobic, 0.6%
Waste-to-energy treatment, 6.1%
Collection and transfer, 1.1% Landfill, 0.9%
Dismantling, 8.0%
Others, 0.2%
FY17E revenue segment contribution
BCG NZ, 48.9%
Construction, 18.5%
Anaerobic, 1.3%
Waste-to-energy treatment, 12.9%
Collection and transfer, 1.7%
Landfill, 0.7%
Dismantling, 6.2%
Hazardous, 9.6%
Others, 0.1%
FY18E revenue segment contribution
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 9
Utilizing the three common solid waste treatment technologies, namely landfill,
waste-to-energy and anaerobic treatment, CEHL is capable of providing waste
management services for all kinds of solid waste, including urban waste and
industrial hazardous waste. The company targets at providing comprehensive
solutions that minimize the waste size, while controlling the energy consumption,
operating costs and repeated pollution. Compared with traditional solid waste
treatment operators, CEHL aims to extend its services by integrating waste collection,
transfer and treatment, which would maximize its operating efficiency and market
share.
Figure 6. CEHL’s major business segments and capacity
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Compared to the traditional landfill method, waste-to-energy treatment substantially
reduces the size of leftovers and delivers additional income from power generation.
Anaerobic treatment for organic waste, including kitchen waste, minimizes the
repeated post-treatment pollution. Incorporating these methods into its solutions,
CEHL is capable of handling all kinds of solid waste and building up its brand to
acquire new projects.
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 10
Figure 7. Solid waste treatment solutions
Treatment Method Energy Consumption Reduction of waste size Operating cost Repeated pollution
Landfill Low Minor (10%) Low High
Waste-to-energy High Substantial (80-90%) High High
Anaerobic Medium Standard (50-60%) Medium Low
Source: Company data
Waste-to-energy business to drive revenue – With mature business model and
booming demand ahead, CEHL strategically places its focus on waste-to-energy
projects that bring in stable profit from both government subsidies and electricity
sales. The Build-Own-Transfer (BOT) model has been widely adopted in its waste-
to-energy business, in which the company is eligible for stable subsidy income during
the long concession period of about 30 years upon completion of construction.
Government subsidy for its existing waste-to-energy projects stands at a wide range
of RMB65-146 per ton, varying among different locations, while power tariff remains
high at RMB0.65/kWh for the initial 280kWh per ton of waste. Going forward,
government subsidies would be further adjusted upward in line with the inflation of
its operating costs. Looking ahead, CEHL would gradually improve the gross profit
margin of the waste-to-energy business to about 20% with the scale up of operating
capacity.
Figure 8. Revenue streams of waste-to-energy treatment
Income Source Pricing standard
Government subsidy Price range from RMB65-146/ton
Power tariff
(State Grid)
Initial 280kWh/ton RMB0.65/kWh
From 281kWh/ton In line with coal-fired power tariff
Source: Company data
As of Jul 2017, CEHL has signed 15 waste-to-energy projects with total daily
treatment capacity of about 13.65k tons, in which two projects with capacity of 1.8k
tons are currently in operation. The company has optimized its operation of the
Quanling waste-to-energy project located in Nanchang, Jiangxi, where it controls the
operating costs with advanced waste incineration technology from Japan. The
company aims at further replicating its successful formula in other sites. Looking
ahead, CEHL would continue to expand its waste-to-energy business. We expect
the attributable capacity would achieve a CAGR of 27% in FY17-21E, reaching about
25.6k ton by FY21E.
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 11
Figure 9. Waste-to-energy daily capacity projection
Segments FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E FY21E
Attributable operating capacity 1,787 tons 2,766 tons 6,000 tons 8,000 tons 10,000 tons 12,000 tons
Attributable greenfield capacity 5,916 tons 8,837 tons 9,103 tons 10,603 tons 12,103 tons 13,603 tons
Attributable capacity 7,703 tons 11,603 tons 15,103 tons 18,603 tons 22,103 tons 25,605 tons
Total capacity 9,750 tons 13,650 tons 17,150 tons 20,650 tons 24,150 tons 27,650 tons
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Figure 10. The Quanling waste-to-energy plant in Nanchang, Jiangxi
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Anaerobic and hazardous waste treatment boosted overall GPM – CEHL has a
total of 7 projects in the more profitable anaerobic treatment for organic waste and
hazardous waste treatment businesses. Organic waste commonly include kitchen
food waste, paper products, garden waste, etc. Similar to waste-to-energy projects,
CEHL would collect government subsidies at a price range of RMB 85-230/ton for its
existing anaerobic treatment projects depending on location. In the industrial areas
with urgent demand for hazardous waste treatment such as Jiangsu and Shandong,
the treatment tariff stands at a high level at about RMB 3,200/ton. Looking ahead,
gross profit margin for hazardous waste treatment and anaerobic treatment could
reach about 60% and 25% respectively, which could become new revenue drivers
in the coming two years.
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 12
Figure 11. Government subsidies of anaerobic and hazardous waste treatment
Income Source Pricing standard
Anaerobic Treatment Price range of RMB 85-230/ton
Hazardous waste treatment Price range at about RMB 3,200/ton
Source: Company data
CEHL is currently participating in four anaerobic waste treatment projects with
attributable daily capacity of about 1,688 tons, where the first 400 tons is expected
to commence operation as early as this year. Looking ahead, CEHL would continue
to expand the segment size with a CAGR of about 17% in daily attributable capacity
in FY17-21E, reaching about 3,688 tons by FY21E.
Figure 12. Anaerobic treatment daily capacity projection
Segments FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E FY21E
Attributable operating capacity / 400 tons 1,200 tons 1,600 tons 2,000 tons 2,400 tons
Attributable greenfield capacity 1,688 tons 1,288 tons 988 tons 1,088 tons 1,188 tons 1,288 tons
Attributable capacity 1,688 tons 1,688 tons 2,188 tons 2,688 tons 3,188 tons 3,688 tons
Total capacity 2,490 tons 2,490 tons 2,990 tons 3,490 tons 3,990 tons 4,490 tons
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
CEHL has engaged in three hazardous waste treatment projects, which are currently
at initial stage. As one of the strategic move of the company, an incremental daily
capacity of about 300 tons per annum is expected in the coming five years, in which
the first batch with daily capacity of about 400 tons would start operation in FY18E.
We expect CEHL’s attributable daily capacity would increase with a CAGR of about
59% in FY17-21E, reaching about 1,608 tons by FY21E.
Figure 13. Hazardous waste treatment daily capacity projection
Segments FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E FY21E
Attributable operating capacity / / 400 tons 700 tons 900 tons 1,100 tons
Attributable greenfield capacity 158 tons 408 tons 308 tons 308 tons 408 tons 508 tons
Attributable capacity 158 tons 408 tons 708 tons 1,008 tons 1,308 tons 1,608 tons
Total capacity 158 tons 408 tons 708 tons 1,008 tons 1,308 tons 1,608 tons
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 13
Integrated project incorporating waste collection and transfer – Compared with
traditional waste management operators, CEHL is looking to integrate the upstream
waste collection and transfer business into its waste-to-energy projects, which could
effectively control its operating costs, receive additional subsidies and increase
market shares. CEHL currently owns 11 waste collection and transfer projects with
total capacity of about 3k tons, of which six of them are integrated with waste-to-
energy projects. CEHL would be eligible for additional government subsidies within
the range of RMB 93-279/ton for its existing projects.
Figure 14. Government subsidies of anaerobic and hazardous waste treatment
Income Source Pricing standard
Waste collection and transfer Price range of RMB 93-279/ton
Source: Company data
CEHL is anticipated to expand its waste collection and transfer business rapidly in
the coming five years. Based on the existing 11 projects, we expect its revenue will
start to contribute from FY17 with its first batch of projects put into operation. By
FY21E, CEHL would further enlarge its attributable capacity to about 9k tons at a
CAGR of about 45% in FY17-21E.
Figure 15. Waste collection and transfer daily capacity projection
Segments FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E FY21E
Attributable operating capacity / 724 tons 1,500 tons 2,400 tons 3,600 tons 4,800 tons
Attributable greenfield capacity 1,386 tons 2,262 tons 2,986 tons 3,586 tons 3,886 tons 4,186 tons
Attributable capacity 1,386 tons 2,986 tons 4,486 tons 5,986 tons 7,486 tons 8,986 tons
Total capacity 1,386 tons 2,986 tons 4,486 tons 5,986 tons 7,486 tons 8,986 tons
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Beneficiary of policy support and mature PPP models – CEHL is one of the
beneficiaries of the favorable policies in the solid waste sector, where the Chinese
government is shifting its focus to environmental protection in its 13th Five Year Plan.
As required by the government, the PPP model will be adopted in all waste treatment
projects, where the private firms are responsible for construction of new projects and
entitled to a long concession period upon completion. Private firms could leverage
and replicate their mature business models and be guaranteed of a stable cash flow
within the concession period, which would bring in considerable profit to the investors.
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 14
3.2 Strong brand for acquiring new projects
Build up brand for future bidding – CEHL has introduced various solid waste
treatment technology to control its operating costs and retain a high treatment quality
in compliance with the environmental standard. With advanced waste treatment
technology from EU and incineration technology from Japan, CEHL is capable of
providing treatment services for all kinds of solid waste, including the hazardous
waste that requires the most advanced technology to enter the market. CEHL is also
the first company to introduce anaerobic digestion technology in China. The
company is committed to building up its brand in the waste treatment industry to
increase its competiveness in future bidding.
Figure 16. CEHL’s comprehensive solid waste treatment technology
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Extensive network and good track record to facilitate new acquisitions – With
strong support from its parent company Beijing Capital, CEHL has established an
extensive national network covering about 37 cities to acquire new projects with the
main focus on Henan, Jiangxi and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei areas. Beijing Capital, one
of the largest SOEs under Beijing State-owned Assets Supervision and
Administration (SASAC), has been the controlling shareholder of Capital
Environment since 2011. Beijing Capital has already built up its reputation and
maintains an outstanding track record of wastewater treatment projects nationwide.
We anticipate that CEHL could easily facilitate the acquisition of high quality projects
taking advantages of its extensive network and experience.
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 15
3.3 Well-funded business expansion plan
Rapid capacity expansion with Capex budget of RMB1.2bn – CEHL has
formulated a robust business expansion plan, which we estimate that it would require
an annual Capex of about RMB1.2bn, based on an incremental operating capacity
costs of about RMB300k/ton as well as a daily operating capacity growth of 4k tons
per annum. As at Jul 2017, the company has signed 15 waste-to-energy projects,
11 waste collection and transfer projects, 4 anaerobic treatment projects, 4 landfills
and 3 hazardous waste treatment projects with attributable daily capacity of over 20k
tons, of which about 2,661 tons are currently in operation. CEHL has been
accelerating its progress in construction of new projects, in which the common
construction period for each of its existing projects would be less than one year and
a half. The Capex requirement of its expansion can be well financed at a low funding
cost of around 5%. Looking ahead, we expect the CEHL’s daily attributable waste
treatment capacity in operation could further increase to 21.9k tons by FY21E,
representing a CAGR of about 52.4% during the period.
Figure 17. CEHL’s incremental daily operating waste treatment capacity and Capex required
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
2,103
5,336
3,800 4,000 4,000
1.60
1.14
1.20 1.20 1.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Incremental attributable operating capacity (tons) (LHS) Capex Required (RMB'bn) (RHS)
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 16
3.4 Sound synergy from BCG NZ
CEHL acquired 51% interests of BCG NZ from its parent company Beijing Capital
Group in 2016 at equity consideration of USD234mn, issuing about 4.54bn new
shares at HKD0.40/share. In 2014, Beijing Capital Group acquired the entire
interests of Transpacific New Zealand (TPINZ) at consideration for a about
NZD950mn, equivalent to about RMB5bn, which was later renamed to BCG NZ.
BCG NZ is the largest waste management service provider in New Zealand retaining
over 30% market share, serving over 200k customers in the largest cities of New
Zealand, covering collection, transfer, treatment and recycling of residential,
commercial and industrial waste. This investment does not only deliver stable profit
and cash flow, but also brings in mature and profitable business models as well as
practical experience regarding project operation and integration. BCG NZ is currently
operated at an optimal level and generated an operating profit of about RMB265mn
in FY16. Should CEHL consider purchasing the remaining 49% stake from its parent,
there would be an additional profit of over RMB175mn, representing 52% of its
attributable profit in FY18E.
Figure 18. Comprehensive waste management service of BCG NZ
Services Highlights
Residential waste collection Collect and transfer residential waste to interchange station
Commercial waste collection Collect and transfer commercial waste to interchange station
Solid waste treatment Cover solid waste treatment, landfill and recycle services
Liquid waste treatment Cover liquid, medical and hazardous waste treatment services
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 17
4. Industry Outlook
4.1 Solid waste industry starting to drive revenue
In the 13th Five Year Plan, it is expected that the total investments in solid waste
sector would substantially expand to about RMB4.5trn during the period,
representing 26% of total investments in the environmental protection industry. The
latest budget is about 463% larger than in the previous Five Year Plan, reaching
about RMB4.5trn during the period.
Figure 19. Total investments in solid waste sector from 10th to 13th Five Year Plan
Source: Forward Institute
Solid waste comes from a variety of sources including industrial, urban and
agricultural. The entire solid waste treatment industry is currently at an initial
development stage being driven mainly by favorable policies. Thanks to the fast
industrialization and urbanization in China, treatment demand from urban and
industrial wastes continued to drive the sector growth during the past decades. Direct
landfill, requiring smaller amounts of investments and operating costs, still plays a
dominant role in solid waste treatment. Going forward, waste-to-energy treatment,
which minimizes the residue size and regenerates energy, is expected to see
accelerated growth and become the prevailing method in the coming five years.
0.12 0.21
0.8
4.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
10th 11th 12th 13th
RMB trn
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 18
Figure 20. Flow chart of solid waste treatment
Source: Quam Securities
Figure 21. Current solid waste treatment structure in China
Source: Quam Securities
64%
35%
1%
Landfill Waste-to-energy Others
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 19
4.2 Waste-to-energy sector in China
While the volume of municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment had maintained stable
growth in the past five years, the weight of waste-to-energy treatment has been
increasing steadily during the period. The improved technology has made waste-to-
energy treatment a better solution for MSW, which has smaller foot print, lower levels
of residues and more efficient power regeneration. In the 13th Five Year Plan, China
aims to further increase the weight of waste-to-energy treatment from the current
about 35% to over 50% by 2020, which implies great potential for future growth of
the WTE sector in the coming years.
Figure 22. Urban waste transferred volume and weight of waste-to-energy treatment
Source: Quam Securities
Compared with the traditional landfill business, waste-to-energy operators have two
major revenue streams, namely, subsidy income from local governments and power
tariff from the State Grid. With PPP models fully implemented in the business, which
better protects the profitability of operators within the concession periods, it is
expected that larger scale of funds would be attracted from the private sector to
invest in the industry.
164 171 172
179 184
21.9% 23.0%
27.5%
32.2%35.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Urban waste transferred volume (mn tons) (LHS) Weight of WTE treatment (RHS)
mn tons
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 20
4.3 Expanding demand on hazardous waste treatment
Hazardous waste constitutes about 5% of overall industrial solid waste, and requires
a much higher environmental standard because of its corrosive, toxic, inflammable
or infectious characteristics. Although the growth in treatment capacity has been
catching up in the past five years, it is still far below the actual demands for
hazardous waste treatment, especially in the several eastern provinces with
intensive industrial zones such as Shandong, Jiangsu and Hunan. It is expected that
the hazardous waste treatment demand will maintain a stable double-digit growth in
the coming three years.
Figure 23. Hazardous waste actual generation and operating volume in China, 2011-2015
Source: Quam Securities
Figure 24. Hazardous waste treatment methods in China in 2016
Source: Quam Securities
34.31 34.6531.57
36.3439.76
10.1312.53 13.31 14.06 15.36
30%
36%42%
39% 39%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Actual generation vol (mn tons)(LHS) Actual operating volume (mn tons) (LHS)
Treatment rate (RHS)
51%
29%
20%
Recycled Harmless Treatment In Storage
mn tons
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 21
Given the harmful characteristics of hazardous waste, it is a segment with a high
entry barrier, consisting of three aspects including qualification, technology and sites.
A long approval period and extremely high environmental standards are required in
license application for collection, transfer, storage and treatment of hazardous
wastes. Since there are various kinds of hazardous waste, it also requires advanced
harmless treatment technology and a relatively long time to find suitable sites for a
new hazardous treatment plant. PPP models are widely adopted in hazardous waste
treatment projects where its high profitability has been attracting more players from
private sector to enter the market. As such, the current decentralized sector has
begun to consolidate, mainly through M&As to bypass the high entry barriers.
Figure 25. Entry barrier of hazardous waste sector
Categories Entry barriers
Qualification Time-consuming and high costs required for license application
Technology Advanced technology required for harmless treatment
Sites Difficulties in finding suitable locations for hazardous waste treatment
Source: Quam Securities
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 22
5. Financial Analysis
5.1 Revenue breakdown
CEHL’s two major business segments: BCG NZ and domestic projects contributed
about 78% and 22% of its total revenue in FY16, respectively. CEHL has been
accelerating the construction of its committed domestic projects, where the
construction revenue would increase to about RMB900mn in the coming years. The
domestic segment is the core revenue driver and is expected to deliver substantial
growth with a CAGR of 74.2% in FY17-19E, accounting for about 56.2% of FY19E’s
total revenue. The BCG NZ, which has optimized its operation, will also maintain its
stable growth at about 5% YoY during the period, reaching about RMB2.50bn in
FY19E’s revenue. Anticipating a strong domestic growth as well as the stable
revenue contribution from BCG NZ, CEHL is expected to generate a CAGR of 29.3%
in revenue in FY17-19E, reaching about RMB5.71bn in FY19E.
Figure 26. Revenue forecast of segments
Source: Company data, Quam Securities.
2,708
3,604
4,817
5,707
6,398
7,106
33.1% 33.7%
18.5%
12.1%11.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2016 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Revenue YoY Growth
Rev
enu
e(R
MB
mill
ion
)
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 23
5.2 Profitability
We expect the company to continue to improve its overall margins starting FY17E
with the introduction of the lucrative waste treatment business as well as the
normalized SG&A and the absence of costs related to the acquisition of BCG NZ. It
is estimated that revenue contribution from anaerobic and hazardous waste
treatment that will deliver a high gross profit margin of 25% and 60% respectively
will commence in FY17-18E, driving the overall gross profit margin to about 31.2%
by FY19E. With the effective costs control in project operation thanks to advanced
technologies as well as insignificant finance cost backed by PPP models and its
parent company, we anticipate that CEHL will further improve its operating margin
and net profit margin to about 20.5% and 11.8% respectively in FY19E.
Figure 27. Profit margins of CEHL
Source: Company data, Quam Securities. Data in FY15 is restated.
28.2%29.4%
27.7%
29.9%31.2% 31.7% 32.1%
15.3%13.3%
16.5%
19.4%20.5%
21.9%23.2%
11.3%
4.9%
7.5%
10.5%11.8%
13.2%14.5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
2015* 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Gross Profit Margin Operating Profit Margin Net Profit Margin
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 24
5.3 Financial position
CEHL has a healthy financial position with an adequate level of liquidity and
reasonable borrowings. As of 31st Dec 2016, it had net debt of about RMB2.94bn,
calculated from a cash balance of RMB771mn and interest-bearing debt of
RMB3.72bn, equivalent to net gearing ratio of about 69%. With strong support from
its parent Beijing Capital Group and PPP models adopted in the projects, CEHL had
well controlled its funding costs to about 4.9% in FY16.
Going forward, we anticipate that the company will further increase its financial
leverage to support its business expansion plan in FY17-18E, where its net gearing
ratio will reach about 105% in FY18E. After that, the company’s Capex from new
projects development could be well-financed by its internal resources. It is estimated
that CEHL will generate a strong operating cash flow of about RMB1.26bn in FY19E
with considerable profit from project operations. At an effective interest rate of about
5%, the finance costs in the coming years should remain insignificant.
Figure 28. Liquidity and solvency ratios
Source: Company data, Quam Securities. Data in FY15 is restated.
4.53%
4.91%
5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
37% 40%45% 46% 46% 43% 40%
43%
69%
100%105% 102%
91%
77%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
4.20%
4.30%
4.40%
4.50%
4.60%
4.70%
4.80%
4.90%
5.00%
5.10%
2015* 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Costs of borrowing (LHS) Total D/A Ratio (RHS) Net D/E Ratio (RHS)
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 25
5.4 Operating efficiency
With BOT and PPP models widely adopted in its business, CEHL could guarantee a
stable cash flow from government subsidies and collect electricity tariff from the State
Grid. The mature BCG NZ operated at an optimal level also contributed stable cash
flow to the company. As a result, CEHL has maintained its operating efficiency with
operating cycle and cash conversion cycle of about 92.5 days and 47.3 days
respectively. Since the government subsidies are included in the financial budget of
local governments, receivables should be well controlled within the concession
period of the projects. Looking ahead, we anticipate that the operating cycle and
cash conversion cycle of CEHL would remain stable at about 91 days and 46 days
in FY17-21E.
Figure 29. Operating Efficiency
Source: Company Data, Quam Securities. Data in FY15 is restated.
6.9 5.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
72.5
86.9 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0
79.4
92.5 91.0 91.0 91.0 91.0 91.0
48.8 47.3
46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2015* 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Day
s
Days Inventory Days Accounts Receivable
Operating Cycle Cash Conversion Cycle
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 26
6. Company Background
6.1 Key milestones
CEHL is the leading solid waste management operator in China. Beijing Capital, one of
the largest SOEs under Beijing SASAC, has been the controlling shareholder of CEHL
since 2011. CEHL raised about HKD2.1bn in the 1-for-1 rights issue of HKD0.45/share
in June 2015. Its market capitalization reached HKD4.29bn as at 31st Jul 2017.
Figure 30. Key milestones
Source: Company data
2011•Beijing Capital became controlling shareholder of CEHL
2012
•Disposed clothing business
•Stepped into solid waste treatment business
2013•Acquired high quality projects in Huizhou, Yangzhou and Huai'an
2014
•Changed name to Capital Environment
•Total daily treatment capacity reached over 6,000 tons
2015•Beijing Capital increased its shareholding to 51% with a 1-for-1 rights issue
2016•Acquired 51% interests of NZ urban waste treatment business
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 27
6.2 Strong support from Beijing Capital Group
CEHL is one of the four cornerstones of the Beijing Capital Group with a focus on the
solid waste management industry. Beijing Capital Group, one of the large SOEs of
SASAC, covers four major industries in China, namely environment, infrastructure, real
estate and financial services. With strong support and extensive national network of
Beijing Capital Group, CEHL is capable of acquiring high quality assets in China and
overseas.
Figure 31. Background of Beijing Capital Group
Source: Company data
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 28
6.3 Shareholding structure
Figure 32. Shareholding structure as at 31st Jul 2017
Source: Company data
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 29
6.4 Financial statements Income Statement (RMB mn) 2015* 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Revenue 2,639 2,708 3,604 4,874 5,707
Cost of goods sold (1,894) (1,913) (2,607) (3,415) (3,925)
Gross profit 745 795 997 1,459 1,783
Other income and gains, net 58 52 68 71 75
Operating expenses (399) (486) (469) (585) (685)
EBIT 405 361 596 946 1,173
Finance costs (65) (173) (236) (261) (276)
Profit before tax 340 189 360 685 897
Income tax expense (42) (55) (90) (172) (224)
Profit after tax 298 134 270 514 673
Minority interest 140 90 157 180 195
Attributable profit to shareholders
158 44 113 334 478
Per Share Items (RMB fen) 2015* 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
EPS 1.29 0.31 0.79 2.34 3.34
Diluted EPS 1.29 0.31 0.79 2.34 3.34
DPS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
BVPS 26.1 21.7 21.9 24.0 27.2
Key Ratios 2015* 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Debt to equity 0.76 0.87 1.09 1.13 1.09
Net debt to equity 0.43 0.69 1.00 1.05 1.02
Current ratio (x) 1.92 1.27 0.72 1.13 1.18
Quick ratio (x) 1.89 1.25 0.70 1.10 1.14
Interest coverage (x) 7.13 1.48 2.53 3.63 4.25
Days inventory (days) 6.9 5.6 6.0 6.0 6.0
Days receivable (days) 72.5 86.9 85.0 85.0 85.0
Days payable (days) 30.6 45.2 45.0 45.0 45.0
Operating cycle (days) 79.4 92.5 91.0 91.0 91.0
Cash conversion cycle (days) 48.8 47.3 46.0 46.0 46.0
Cashflow Statement (RMB mn) 2015* 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Operating activities
EBITDA 646 627 924 1,438 1,746
Other gains/losses (141) (123) (120) (120) (120)
Operating cashflow before W/C 505 504 804 1,318 1,626
Change in working capital (392) (177) (124) (209) (140)
Tax paid (78) (76) (90) (171) (224)
Cash flow from operations 35 251 591 937 1,263
Investing activities
Capex (227) (419) (1,601) (1,140) (1,200)
Others (103) (96) (100) (100) (100)
Cash flow from investing activities
(330) (515) (1,701) (1,240) (1,300)
Financing activities
Change in bank borrowings (464) 334 1,000 500 300
Interest paid (57) (244) (236) (261) (276)
Others 1,617 (546) 0 4 0
Cash flow from financing activities
1,096 (456) 764 243 24
Net increase/decrease in cash and cash equivalents
801 (720) (346) (60) (13)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the Year
646 1,441 756 410 350
Effect of foreign exchange rate (5) 35 0 0 0
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the Year
1,441 756 410 350 337
Ratio Analysis 2015* 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Growth (YoY%)
Revenue 2.6% 33.1% 35.2% 17.1%
EBIT -10.7% 64.9% 58.7% 24.0%
Attributable profit -72.2% 158.8% 194.3% 43.0%
Diluted EPS -76.2% 158.8% 194.3% 43.0%
Margins
Gross profit margin 28.2% 29.4% 27.7% 29.9% 31.2%
EBIT margin 15.3% 13.3% 16.5% 19.4% 20.5%
Net profit margin 11.3% 4.9% 7.5% 10.5% 11.8%
Other ratios
Return on assets 3.3% 1.4% 2.6% 4.6% 5.6%
Return on equity 6.8% 3.1% 6.2% 11.1% 13.2%
ROIC 3.9% 1.7% 3.0% 5.2% 6.4%
Dividend payout ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Valuation measures
PER (x) 18.91 79.38 30.67 10.42 7.29
PBR (x) 0.93 1.12 1.11 1.01 0.90
Dividend yield N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Balance Sheet (RMB mn) 2015* 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Non-current assets
PPE 1,303 1,687 2,714 3,219 3,696
Intangibles 1,692 1,882 2,127 2,270 2,419
Goodwill 1,718 1,927 1,927 1,927 1,927
Non-current prepayments 1,766 2,064 2,064 2,064 2,064
Total non-current assets 6,479 7,560 8,833 9,480 10,107
Current assets
Inventories 36 29 43 56 65
Trade and bills receivables 524 644 839 1,135 1,329
Other receivables 77 106 106 106 106
Due from associates 36 39 39 39 39
Cash and cash equivalents 1,436 771 410 350 337
Other current assets 325 115 115 115 115
Total current assets 2,434 1,705 1,553 1,802 1,991
Total assets 8,913 9,265 10,385 11,282 12,098
Current liabilities
Trade and bills payables 159 237 321 421 484
Other payables and accruals 429 453 453 453 453
Bank borrowings 384 458 1,194 522 552
Shareholders’ loan 138 150 150 150 150
Other current liabilities 158 47 47 47 47
Total current liabilities 1,268 1,344 2,164 1,592 1,685
Non-current liabilities
Bank borrowings 2,935 3,257 3,522 4,694 4,964
Deferred tax liabilities 197 189 189 189 189
Other non-current liabilities 149 182 182 182 182
Total non-current liabilities 3,281 3,629 3,894 5,066 5,336
Total liabilities 4,549 4,973 6,058 6,657 7,020
Shareholders’ equity
Share capital 797 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188
Reserves 2,403 1,914 1,949 3,238 3,691
Total shareholders’ equity 3,201 3,102 3,137 4,427 4,879
Minority interest 1,164 1,190 1,190 1,190 1,190
Total equity 4,365 4,292 4,327 4,625 5,078
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 30
Appendix: CEHL’s solid waste treatment projects Figure 33. CEHL’s current waste-to-energy projects
Project Location Equity Interest Total Daily Capacity Treatment Fees Development stage
Nanchang, Jiangxi 100% 1,200 tons RMB 78/ton In operation
Shenzhen, Guangdong 46% 900 tons RMB 128/ton Initial stage
Huizhou, Guangdong 97.85% 600 tons RMB 146/ton In operation
Ruijin, Jiangxi 51% 1,200 tons RMB 69/ton Initial stage
Gao’an, Jiangxi 60% 900 tons RMB 65/ton In construction
Xinxiang, Henan 70% 1,050 tons RMB 80/ton Initial stage
Xihua, Henan 100% 900 tons RMB 68/ton Initial stage
Qianjiang, Hubei 100% 600 tons / Initial stage
Linyi, Shanxi 100% 900 tons / Initial stage
Duyun, Guizhou 95% 900 tons RMB 132/ton In construction
Shicheng, Jiangxi 60% 600 tons / Initial stage
Suixian, Henan 100% 1,200 tons RMB 65/ton Acquired in 2017
Lushan, Henan 100% 1,200 tons RMB 60/ton Acquired in 2017
Qixian, Henan 100% 600 tons RMB 63/ton Acquired in 2017
Suichuan, Jiangxi 100% 900 tons RMB 62/ton Acquired in 2017
Total 13,650 tons RMB 60-146/ton
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Figure 34. CEHL’s current anaerobic treatment projects
Project Location Equity Interest Total Daily Capacity Treatment Fees Development stage
Dongcun, Beijing 20% 930 tons RMB 85/ton Initial stage
Yangzhou, Jiangsu 100% 200 tons RMB 202/ton Initial stage
Ningbo, Zhejiang 100% 1,200 tons RMB 198/ton Initial stage
Jinzhong, Shanxi 63.88% 160 tons RMB 230/ton Initial stage
Total 2,490 tons RMB 85-230/ton
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 31
Figure 35. CEHL’s current hazardous waste treatment projects
Project Location Equity Interest Total Daily Capacity Treatment Fees Development stage
Yangzhou, Jiangsu 100% 930 tons RMB 3,200/ton Initial stage
Zibo, Shandong 100% 1,200 tons / Initial stage
Meishan, Sichuan 100% 160 tons / Initial stage
Total 2,290 tons RMB 3,200/ton
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Figure 36. CEHL’s current waste collection and transfer projects
Project Location Equity Interest Total Daily Capacity Treatment Fees Development stage
Nanyang, Henan 100% 724 tons RMB 279/ton In construction
Linyi, Shanxi 100% 260 tons RMB 160/ton Initial stage
Duyun, Guizhou 100% 150 tons RMB 150/ton In construction
Shicheng, Jiangxi 100% 252 tons / Initial stage
Xihua, Henan 100% / RMB 125/ton Initial stage
Qianjiang, Hubei 100% / RMB 93/ton Initial stage
Suixian, Henan 100% 400 tons RMB 100/ton Acquired in 2017
Lushan, Henan 100% / RMB 116/ton Acquired in 2017
Suiping, Henan 100% 300 tons RMB 113/ton Acquired in 2017
Qixian, Henan 100% 600 tons RMB 123/ton Acquired in 2017
Suichuan, Jiangxi 100% 300 tons RMB 120/ton Acquired in 2017
Total 2,986 tons RMB 93-279/ton
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 32
Figure 37. CEHL’s current landfill projects
Project Location Equity Interest Total Daily Capacity Treatment Fees Development stage
Duyun, Guizhou 92% 300 tons RMB 125/ton In operation
Weng’an, Guizhou 80% 150 tons RMB 120/ton In operation
Huludao, Liaoning 100% 424 tons RMB 77/ton In operation
Zibo, Shandong 100% 100 tons / Initial stage
Total 974 tons RMB 77-125/ton
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Figure 38. CEHL’s current worn electronic appliances dismantling projects
Project Location Equity Interest Total Annual Capacity Treatment Fees Development stage
Maanshan, Anhui 95% 1.2mn units RMB 135/unit In operation
Huai’an, Shandong 55% 2mn units RMB 135/unit In operation
Total 3.2mn units RMB 135/unit
Source: Company data, Quam Securities
Capital Environment (3989 HK) 33
Rating Definitions Disclaimer and Risk Statement BUY We expect the stock to have a total return of > 15% over the next
12 months This document is published by Quam Securities Company Limited (“Quam Securities”), a licensed corporation (central entity number AAC577) regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. This document is for distribution in Hong Kong only to persons who are “Professional Investors” as defined in Part 1 of Schedule 1 of Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap 571) of Hong Kong and any rules made thereunder. This document is not intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to applicable law or regulation within such jurisdiction. This document does not constitute an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. This document is circulated to addresses solely and may not be reproduced or redistributed to any other person or published, in whole or in part, for any purpose. The research is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Quam Securities does not make any representation or warranty as to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. Opinions expressed are subject to change without prior notice. Any recommendation does not have regard to specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any specific addressee. Quam Securities accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this document. Quam Securities and its affiliates as well as persons associated with any of them from time to time may or may not have interests in the securities mentioned in this document. The prices of securities may move up or down, and past performance is not an indication of future performance. Investors shall consider seeking separate legal or financial advice before making investment decisions.
HOLD We expect the stock to have a total return of < 15% and >-15% over the next 12 months
SELL We expect the stock to have a total return of < -15% over the next 12 months
Disclosures Analyst Certification: The following analysts hereby certify that their views about the companies and their securities discussed in this report are accurately expressed and that they have not received and will not receive direct or indirect compensation in exchange for expressing specific recommendations or views in this report: Li Yiming (CE No. BIE646), the authors of this document and their associates declare that as of the date of the publication of this report, they do not hold any financial interest in the company.