captain bechara mallouk chief pilot research and ... · any aircraft may fly the lead on 28l,...

16
Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 1 Captain Bechara Mallouk Chief Pilot Research and Navigation February 02, 2017

Upload: hoangkiet

Post on 11-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 1

Captain Bechara Mallouk Chief Pilot Research and Navigation February 02, 2017

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 2

Overview of RNP to GLS Demonstration

San Francisco Airport Operational Summary

Procedure Design and Demonstration

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 3

Objective

• Communicate benefits of RNP to GLS procedures with a demonstration flight

• Accelerate GNSS Landing System (GLS) use and Ground Based Augmentation system(GBAS)

implementation

• Early airport and ATC stakeholder buy in – collaboratively designed procedures

United and Delta Driven Project

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 4

Airport Overview

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 5

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 6

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 7

DESIGN OBJECTIVES

• First precision approach to 19R

• Deconflict approach with Oakland airspace

APPROACH DETAILS

• Collaboratively designed procedures

• Continuous descent vertical path (No speedbrakes)

• Use of automation & normal crew procedures

POTENTIAL BENEFIT

• Continuous descent reduces noise and emissions

• RNP (RF leg) to GLS reduces track miles

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 8

Continuous Low Descent Reduces Fuel Burn and Emissions

Sample radar vectors to 19L/19R

Oakland Airport

Typical average radar vectors “types” compared to GLS Procedure

RWY 12 Arrival Track

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 9

Flight Track 20.5 nm 36.3 nm 40.3 nm

Fuel Burn 424 lb / 193 kg 792 lb / 360 kg 980 lb / 436 kg

Carbon Emissions

1338 lb / 608 kg 2499 lb / 1136 kg 3092 lb / 1405 kg

Fuel Burn and Community Noise Exposure to 55 dBA Contour

Continuous Descent

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 10

Simultaneous Offset Instrument Approaches (SOIA) • 1600’ ceiling and 4 mile visibility

• Any aircraft may fly the lead on 28L, aircraft on 28R flies a 3-degree offset approach

• No stagger – aircraft may come in “wingtip to wingtip”

• Yields most operations in visual conditions today – 36/hr

Closely Spaced Parallel Operations (CSPO) • Two straight in approaches to 28L and 28R (no offset)

• 1.5 nm stagger between aircraft

• Sorting restriction – lead airplane cannot be 757 or heavy

• Above CAT I minima – yields 34/hr

Why implement RNP to GLS procedures? • If the sorting restriction for the CSPO were removed, this could enable higher arrival rates than the

SOIA today

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 11

Paired Approaches with ILS RWY 28R

DESIGN OBJECTIVES

• Automate the SOIA procedure – ‘S’ turns manually flown today

• Maintain vertical path from CORKK @ 11000’

APPROACH DETAILS

• Collaboratively designed procedures

• Continuous descent vertical path (No speedbrakes)

• Both aircraft flew alternating ILS and GLS

• Use of automation & normal crew procedures

POTENTIAL BENEFIT

• Continuous descent reduces noise and emissions

• RNP (RF leg) to GLS

• Use of automation

• Potential Minima reduction for paired approaches from 1600’ to 1200’

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 12

Vertical Separation

GLS Concept Diagram LS Automation Guarantees both Lateral and Vertical Track Separatio

Implementing Higher Glideslopes and Displaced Thresholds

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 13

Paired Approaches with ILS RWY 28R

DESIGN OBJECTIVES

• Increase vertical separation between aircraft streams using displaced threshold (2000’) and higher glideslope (3.25⁰)

APPROACH DETAILS • Continuous descent vertical path (No speedbrakes)

• Both aircraft flew alternating ILS and GLS

• Localizer and glideslope engaged prior to AXMUL

POTENTIAL BENEFIT • Remove sorting restriction to 28L to increase operations

per hour

• Continuous descent reduces noise and emissions

• RNP (RF leg) to GLS

Distance to Threshold [nm]

Height Difference Between GLS V and ILS 28L

CEPIN 10.3 +417 Initial Fix

AXMUL 5.7 +398 Intermediate Fix

MA28R 0 +155 Abeam threshold

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 14

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 15

Final Report Contents (http://laas.tc.faa.gov/Documents.html) • Instrument Approach Procedure Design

• Demo Flight Summary

• Environmental Performance Assessment

• Stakeholder Evaluation & Next Steps

Aviation Week

http://aviationweek.com/GLSDemo#slide-0-field_images-1506221

For further information on this project or for RNP to GLS implementation contact Boeing Commercial Aviation Services [email protected]

Copyright © 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. 16