carbon neutral agriculture drivers, options and tools

26
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style Primary Industries Climate Challenges Centre Carbon Neutral Agriculture Drivers, Options and Tools Richard Eckard

Upload: others

Post on 23-Mar-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Click to edit Master title

style

Click to edit Master subtitle style

Primary Industries Climate Challenges Centre

Carbon Neutral AgricultureDrivers, Options and Tools

Richard Eckard

• Methane (10%)

– Ruminants, waste management

• Nitrous Oxide (3%)

– Fertilizer, excreta, waste, legumes etc

• Carbon Dioxide

– Energy, lime, urea application and fertilizer production

• Sequestration

– Soil and trees

Why Carbon Neutral?Agricultural emissions

Sheep Beef

Enteric Methane

77%

Enteric Methane

82%

Dung & Urine9%

Energy4%

Indirect5%

Dung & Urine9% Urea

1%

7-9 kg CO2e/kg CFW+LWT 28-32 kg CO2e/kg CFW

9 - 15 kg CO2e/kg LWT

Energy3%

Why Carbon Neutral?Typical Farm GHG profiles

Christie et al. 2016

Dairy8 – 21 t CO 2 e/t MS

Grains / pulses0.04 t/CO2e/t grain

Rangeland Beef14 t CO2e/t LWT

Enteric CH4 57%

Waste CH4 10%

N2O animal waste

6%

Indirect N2O animal waste

4%

Direct N2O N fertilisers

2%

Indirect N2O N fertilisers

1%

Fuel and electricity

9%

CO2 grains/conce

ntrates 6%

CO2 purchased

forages 2%

CO2 purchased fertilisers

3%

CH4 -Enteric

92%

N2O - Urine & Dung

5%

N2O -Deposition

1%N2O - Leaching

0%

CO2 -Energy1%

CO2 -Lime0%

CO2 - Urea Application

0%

CH4 - Field Burning

10%CH4 - Energy

0%

N2O -Fertiliser

32%N2O - Crop

residues43%

N2O -Atmospheric deposition

3%

N2O -Leaching and

Runoff7%

N2O - Field Burning

4%

N2O -Energy

0%

International Policy DriversCOP21 Paris Agreement

• Reach global peaking GHG emissions as soon as possible

– Achieve a climate neutral world by 2050

• Assumed as net zero GHG, but not required

• Methane may not need to be zero?

– COP26

• Increased 2030 ambition

• Proposed 30% reduction in methane

Carbon Neutral Agriculture Supply chain responses to Paris Agreement

• Fonterra– Climate-neutral growth to 2030 for pre-farmgate

emissions from a 2015 base year

• Unilever– Reducing the GHG impact of their products by

50% by 2030, compared to baseline of 2010

• Mondelez – Reduce absolute GHG from manufacturing 15%– 100% renewable energy

• Nestle– Zero environmental impact in our operations

• JBS– Net-zero GHG by 2040 and zero deforestation

across its global supply chain by 2035

• Heineken– Carbon neutral barley-malt supply chain

• Rabobank– Carbon neutral supply chains

• Mars– Reduce GHG across our value chain 27% by 2025

and 67% by 2050 (from 2015 levels)

• Kellogg Company– 65% reduction by 2050– 100% renewable energy

• Pfizer– 60 to 80% by 2050

• Wilmar international– 89.72% less GHG from 2013 to 2020 – 100% renewable energy

• Olam– Reduce GHGs by 50% by 2030 both in our own

operations and in our supply chain– By 2050, we aspire to be carbon positive in

operations, requiring a 5% emissions reduction per year from 2031 – 2050

• Of the 100 largest economies 69 are companies and 31 are countries

• Government policy may now be less influential than market forces

COP21 - Paris Agreement Investors responses

FAIRR - an index to analyse livestock production

against the Sustainable Development Goals

(SDGs).

A resource for institutional investors on risk of

investment in livestock.

Good Poor

• Danone purchased SILK/Whitewave (2017)

– $12.5B Silk brands

• Fastest growing US food and beverage company

• Plant based milks growing at 11%

– Danone media quotes:

• “Accelerate our towards sustainable and profitable growth”

• “Healthier and more sustainable eating”

• Norco Co-Op & CSIRO

– Milk from yeast

– “Eden Brew was created to help build a sustainable food future by creating a dairy solution that is environmentally sustainable and less resource-intensive” - Eden Milk CEO Jim Fader

COP21 - Paris Agreement Potential impact on dairy

Industry and market driversLivestock Industry Responses

• Australian Red Meat Industry (RMAC 2030 strategy)

– Australian red-meat can be carbon neutral by 2030 (CN30)

• Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), Brazil

– “MS carbon neutral” initiative

– Carbon neutral Brazilian Beef

• New Zealand

– Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act 2019

• Net zero by 2050

• California SB 32• 40 % less methane by 2030 over 1990

• Global Methane Pledge at COP26 • 30% less methane by 2030 by 105 countries

• Livestock

– Arcadian Organic & Natural’s Meat Co’s

– Flinders + Co Meats

– NAPCO

• Wine

– Ross Hill

– Tulloch

– Cullen

Industry and market driversCarbon Neutral Agriculture

• USA: President Joe Biden

– “Failing to curb emissions means America will tax your exports”

– “to ensure his climate policies do not place US workers and companies at an unfair disadvantage” – Financial Times 26 April 2021

• The EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

– “The European Parliament… approval to… start taxing imports from countries without a carbon price… by 2023” – Financial Times 11 March 2020

• Around 70% of Australian Agricultural product is exported

– Australian ranked last on the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI)

• Our only choice is:

– Does the carbon tax get paid outside Australia, or can we keep the revenue within our agricultural sector?

International Policy DriversBorder Adjustment Tariffs

• Carbon Farming

– Management principles that minimise GHGe, maximise carbon sequestration in the landscape, while improving the productivity and resilience of agricultural systems

• (Aus definition)

• Carbon Neutral (net zero)

– Management that minimises GHGe, and offsets the balance of emissions through sequestration of an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide in soils or vegetation

• On an year-by-year basis

• Climate Neutral

– Too vague for IPCC glossary

– No net change in global warming

Carbon Farming, Carbon Neutral

• Carbon account/audit (CA) • Net Emissions (NE = t CO2e/ business unit)

– All GHG from boundary of the farm enterprise

– All GHG upstream

– All Soil and tree sinks

• Carbon footprint (CF) • Emissions intensity (EI = t CO2e/t product)

– Same method as CA

Carbon Neutral vs Carbon Account

CH4

The Carbon Cycle in Agriculture

Litter-C

Microbial Decomposition

SO-C

Leaching-C

CO2

CHO

After Eckard (2009)~Half of all products/compounds in farming is carbon

Humus-C

PO-C

Sequestration

meat, wool, milk – Cgrain, crops

Click to edit Master title

style

Click to edit Master subtitle style

Primary Industries Climate Challenges Centre

What can be done on farm now?Methane and Nitrous Oxide

Do Now

• Management (10%)

– Efficiency, health, fertility

• Legumes (10-15%)

– Leucaena, Lucerne, Vetch, Lotus

• Supplements (10-20%)

– Oils, tannins e.g. grape marc

• Breeding (1%/yr)

– Plants – tannin/oil

– Animals

• Wearable device (ZELP – 50%?)

Do in 5-10 years

• Vaccine (20%)

• Inhibitors (>80%)

– Seaweed

– 3-NOP

• Early life programming

Summary of options for reducing Enteric Methane

Charmley et al. 2016; Grainger et al. (2009); Moate et al. (2011; 2014; 2016); Williams et al. (2019); Van Nevel and

Demeyer (1996); Machado et al. (2014); Li et al. (2018); Eckard and Clark (2018); Li et al. (2018), Meale et al. (2021)

Input management

• N fertiliser & organic inputs

– 4Rs: Rate, source, timing, placement

– Formulation• Slow release N

• Inhibitors (urease + nitrification)

• Legumes

– Less urea N

– Included in crop rotations

• Animals

– Urine = liquid urea

– Energy: protein in diet

Soil management

• More efficient use of soil N

• Less saturation & compaction

• Less soil disturbance

• Irrigation management

Options for reducing nitrous oxide loss

De Klein & Eckard 2008; Eckard R.J. et al. (2006); Christie et al. (2018); Smith et al. (2018)

Click to edit Master title

style

Click to edit Master subtitle style

Primary Industries Climate Challenges Centre

What can be done on farm now?Soil and Tree Carbon

• SOM (%) = Total SOC (%) x 1.72• SOC is ~58% of SOM

– But SOM is much more than SOC

• For soil health, productivity and resilience benefits

– Mainly in fast turnover fractions

• To liberate nutrients

• For climate change mitigation/ carbon offsets

– Mainly in slow turnover pools

• Most resistant forms are best for permanence

• But confer less productivity benefits

• These are not always the same objectives

Sequestration - Soil CarbonSoil Organic Matter vs Soil Carbon

Sequestration - Soil CarbonWhat determines SOC content?

Inputs

• Plant Growth

• Imported C

Outputs

• Microbial turnover

High rainfall = high

Drought = still high

In Australia rainfall has a dominant impact

Source: Jeff Baldock

Drought = lower

High rainfall = high

• Trees for carbon credits

– Struggle to match milk value of land – Leddin et al. (2012)

• Combining multiple benefits

– Salinity, biodiversity, aesthetics, shade and shelter, heat and cold stress, nutrient sinks

– Capital appreciation

• 20% tree coverage = 4 - 8% property value

Rethinking trees on farm

Leddin et al. (2012); Polyakov et al. (2015)

Click to edit Master title

style

Click to edit Master subtitle style

Primary Industries Climate Challenges Centre

On-farm Carbon Accounting

• “Not inconsistent with” the GHG inventory

– All GHG sources

– All sinks (fluxes not stocks)

• Categorised using the Climate Active (NCOS) definition

– Pre farm to farm gate LCA

– Calculated on an annual basis

• Scope 1

– Direct emissions from owned or controlled sources• e.g. methane and nitrous oxide

• Scope 2

– Indirect emissions • e.g. purchased electricity

• Scope 3

– Indirect emissions that occur in a company's value chain• e.g. pre-farm inputs and post-farm transport

Carbon Neutral Accounting The concept

• FarmPrint

– CSIRO - initial focus on dryland broadacre cropping

– Cradle-to-farm-gate approach

– Still in development

• CoolFarm*

– High level of detail

– Good for international comparison

– Not consistent with Australian NGGI method

• FarmGAS*

– Comprehensive coverage of all industries

– AFI - not current with inventory method

• LOOC-C

– Selection of ERF methods

– ERF methodology calculations

• GAF tools

– UniMelb/PICCC - Excel based

– Separate tools for Cropping, Livestock, Dairy, Feedlots, Sugar, Cotton etc

– Recent upgrade to Climate Active format

• DGAS

– Dairy-specific tool, with D-GAF underneath

– Includes pre-farm emissions

– Recent upgrade to Climate Active format

• Zero30 Beef Farmer Carbon Tracker Tool

– UNE - Web-based version of B-GAF

– Climate Active format

• FullCam

– Official carbon model for Australia

– Tree and soil carbon only

– Complex and spatial

Carbon Accounting Tools

• Greenhouse Gas emissions– Consistent with NIR

• Sheep, Beef (SB-GAF), Feedlot (F-GAF)

• Cropping (G-GAF), Sugar (S-GAF), Cotton (C-GAF)

• Dairy (D-GAF/DGAS)

• Carbon stocks and fluxes– Direct measurement

• or

– FullCam model• Soil carbon

• Vegetation carbon

Carbon Accounting

www.piccc.org.au/Tools

• Talaheni - Yass

– Low stocked wool

• Lower methane

– Significant land restoration

• Tree planting, natural regeneration, erosion control

• Jigsaw Farms - Hamilton

– High stocked beef and sheep

– Significant tree planting

• Salinity control

• Carbon offset planting

• Biodiversity

Carbon Neutral Accounting Dynamic accounting

Doran-Bowne et al. 2016, 2017

Click to edit Master title

style

Click to edit Master subtitle style

Primary Industries Climate Challenges Centre© Copyright The University of Melbourne 2008

piccc.org.au