carbon sequestration on agricultural land in wisconsin christopher kucharik ([email protected])...

24
Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik ([email protected]) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE) The Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies University of Wisconsin-Madison November 12, 2008

Upload: joseph-johnston

Post on 17-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin

Christopher Kucharik ([email protected])

Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

The Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies

University of Wisconsin-Madison

November 12, 2008

Page 2: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

The questions:

• What is terrestrial carbon sequestration and why is it connected to bioenergy feedstocks derived from agricultural land?

• Which land management options best promote C sequestration in agriculture?

• Can carbon sequestration on WI agricultural land mitigate C emissions?

Page 3: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

The geographic extent of pre-settlement prairie

Page 4: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Croplands of North America -- 1992

Blended Census and Satellite Data

Source: Ramankutty and Foley (1999)

Page 5: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)
Page 6: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Changes to Ecosystem Carbon Balance

Prairie C fluxes1850-1950 Agriculture

FluxesPla

nt

inp

uts

Soil

resp

irati

on

Soil C pool

Time (centuries)

C S

tock

s

Time (decades)

C S

tock

s

Soil C pool

Pla

nt

inp

uts

Soil

resp

irati

on

Page 7: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)
Page 8: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

What is terrestrial carbon sequestration ?

The net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere into long-lived pools of carbon.

What is terrestrial carbon sequestration ?

The net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere into long-lived pools of carbon.

Soil organic CSoil organic C

roots roots

trees

Page 9: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Carbon Sequestration

• Cost effective way to give us a 20 to 50 year time window to help curtail atmospheric CO2 build-up until other alternatives to fossil fuel can be developed to de-carbonize global energy

• Landowners would receive payments in the future as local utilities/companies purchase “carbon credits” to help mitigate their emissions – Local programs are only voluntary at this point

• Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX)

Page 10: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Most Promising Agricultural Land Management Practices

– Conservation Tillage (minimize disturbance)

– Prairie and grassland restoration• Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)

Nebraska No-till corn

WI CRP land

Page 11: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Corn

Conservation tillageConventional tillage

Page 12: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Corn Stover as a Biofuel Feedstock:Conservation tillage impacts

• 8 million mT in Wisconsin annually produced

• Provides structural stability to soil– Erosion prevention– Nutrient retention

• Increased residue reduces soil water loss and reduces soil temperatures

• Need to consider impacts to soil organic matter and productivity of cropping systems

Page 13: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

• Participants voluntarily remove environmentally sensitive (highly erodible) land from production for 10 or 15 yr contracts

– Established in 1985 (Food Security Act); payment incentives– 36.0 million cumulative acres enrolled in US– Largest U.S. conservation program on private lands– ~534,000 acres in WI (2008); payments $50-100/ac

Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)

Page 14: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Perennial Grasses as Biofuel Sources: Switchgrass, Miscanthus

• Extremely productive (2-4 m high)

• Can be used for electricity, heating, cooking or transportation (think cellulosic ethanol).

• Is renewable energy that can produce no net increase in global warming

• May store large amounts of carbon in plant roots, pulling further carbon from the atmosphere.

• Produces smaller amounts of nitrogen and sulfur oxides (both sources of acid rain) when burned for electricity

Page 15: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Biofuel feedstocks

Page 16: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

WI Governor’s Task Force on Global Warming Recommendations

• Agriculture Sector

– Encourage Prairie Plantings• Current CRP acreage 533,830 acres (1/25/08)• Plant grasses on currently cropped highly erodible land

– 3.1 million acres

– Promote Improved Soil Management Practices• Increase soil C storage through conservation tillage

– Preserve existing C sequestration in CRP• Avoid release of 0.8-1.9 MMT CO2 through 2028

Page 17: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Emerging market for Carbon

• Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX)– www.chicagoclimateexchange.com– Self-regulatory exchange; administers voluntary

legally binding pilot program for reducing and trading GHG emissions in NA

– Goals:• Proof of concept• Inform public and policy• Provide leadership/opportunities• Enhance reputations

Page 18: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

National Farmer Union’s Carbon Credit Program(http://nfu.org/issues/environment/carbon-credits)

Page 19: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Potential C Sequestration: State of Wisconsin

Land use type Total

Acres

Soil CO2

sequestered (tons)

WI CO2 + CH4 Emissions

% equiv

1. Conservation Reserve Program

(rate: 1.0 mT CO2 ac-1)

533,830 533,830 0.47%

2. Highly erodible cropland converted to prairie/switchgrass

(rate: 1.0 mT CO2 ac-1)

3,100,000 3,100,000 2.71%

3. All harvested cropland managed with conservation tillage

(rate: 0.5 mT CO2 ac-1)

8,928,083 4,464,041 3.90%

4. Idle cropland / pastureland

(rate: 0.2 mT CO2 ac-1)

3,135,259 689,757 0.60%

Total 15,697,000 8,787,628 114,500,000

( 7.7%)

Units are metric tons C per year

Page 20: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Mitigating Automobile Emissions:Land use type Total WI Acres Sequestered

Soil C (tons)Equivalent

Automobiles1

% WI Registered Cars (2007)2

1. Conservation Reserve Program

(rate: 1.0 mT CO2 ac-1)

533,830 533,830 97,414 4.1%

2. Highly erodible cropland converted to prairie/switchgrass

(rate: 1.0 mT CO2 ac-1)

3,100,000 3,100,000 565,693 23.8%

3. All harvested cropland managed with conservation tillage

(rate: 0.5 mT CO2 ac-1)

8,928,083 4,464,041 814,606 34.2%

4. Idle cropland / pastureland

(rate: 0.2 mT CO2 ac-1)

3,135,259 689,757 126,098 5.3%

Total 15,697,000 8,787,628 1,603,811 67.5%

1CO2 emissions per automobile = 5.48 MT CO2 yr-1; EPA publication 420-F-05--004

2 Wisconsin. Dept. of Transportation; 2,377,245 total automobiles

Page 21: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30CRP Age (years)

Annual soil C accumulation rate (g C m

-2 yr

-1)

?

Why could this trend be happening?

Page 22: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

UW Agronomy Ph.D. student Gregg Sanfordat GLBRC field trials in Arlington, WI

Page 23: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)
Page 24: Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik (kucharik@wisc.edu) Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)

Five take home points

• Carbon credits are economic arrangements where businesses or individuals pay someone else to counterbalance their CO2 emissions.

• For farmers and other landowners, growing bioenergy crops may increase future payments for carbon sequestration also.

• Buyers beware: the C offsets you pay for may not actually exist in nature.

• C mitigation is not a silver bullet to stop global warming.

• There are still good reasons to perform the management practices carbon offsets encourage -- they support increases in bioenergy feedstocks.