carboxy derivatised ir(iii) complexes: synthesis ...avishek paul, nivedita das, yvonne halpin,...
TRANSCRIPT
- 1 -
Supporting Information
_____________________________________________________________________
Carboxy Derivatised Ir(III) Complexes: Synthesis, Electrochemistry, Photophysical Properties and Photocatalytic
Hydrogen Generation
Avishek Paul, Nivedita Das, Yvonne Halpin, Johannes G. Vos* and Mary T. Pryce*
*School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland_____________________________________________________________________
Index
Figure S1: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) of ppy-COOH 3
Figure S2: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) of ppy-COOEt 3
Figure S3: 1H NMR(Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dceb)](PF6) 4
Figure S4: COSY NMR (Acetonitrile-d3, 400 MHz) of
[Ir(ppyCOOEt)2(dceb)](PF6) 4
Figure S5: 1H NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpy)](PF6) 5
Figure S6: 2D COSY NMR(Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpy)](PF6) 5
Figure S7: 1H NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dpb)](PF6) 6
Figure S8: COSY NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dpb)](PF6) 6
Figure S9: 1H NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(5Brbpy)](PF6) 7
Figure S10: COSY NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-
COOEt)2(5Brbpy)](PF6) 7
Figure S11: 1H NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpp)](PF6) 8
Figure S12: COSY NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpp)](PF6) 8
Figure S13: Chemical shifts of protons (ppy-COOEt) in different
iridium complexes. 1H NMR(Aceteonitrile-d3, 400 MHz);
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Dalton Transactions. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Dalton Transactions.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
- 2 -
(A) [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dceb)](PF6) ;
(B) [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpy)](PF6) ;
(C) [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dpb)](PF6) ;
(D) [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(5Brbpy)](PF6) ;
(E) [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpp)](PF6) 9
Figure S14: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2Cl]2 10
Figure S15a: UV-Vis spectra of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2Cl]2 was recorded
in acetonitrile at room temperature. Concentration of
the solution is ~10-5 M. 10
Figure S15b: UV-Vis spectra of iridium complexes recorded
in acetonitrile at room temperature. Concentration of
the solutions are ~10-5 M. 11
Figure S16: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(µ-Cl)]2. Life time experiment was recorded
in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature 12
Figure S17: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpy)](PF6). Life time experiment was recorded
in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature 12
Figure S18: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpp)](PF6). Life time experiment was recorded
in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature 13
Figure S19: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(5Brbpy)](PF6). Life time experiment was recorded
in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature 13
Figure S20: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dpb)](PF6). Life time experiment was recorded
in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature 14
Figure S21: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of [Ir(ppy-
COOEt)2(dceb)](PF6). Life time experiment was recorded in
nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature. 14
Synthesis of 4,4’-Bis(diethylmethylphophonato)-2,2’-bipyridine (dpb) 15
Synthesis of 5-bromo-2,2’-bipyridine (5Brbpy) 15
Synthesis of 2,2':5',2''-terpyridine (bpp) 15
Quantum Yield Measurements and TON calculation 16
- 3 -
7.58.08.59.09.510.0 ppm
0.97
1.00
2.98
1.97
0.95
11.512.012.513.013.514.014.515.0 ppm
0.848
NCOOH
6
5
4 3 2 3
56
H6(Py)
H3(Ph)H5(Ph)
H2(Ph)H6(Ph)H3(Py)
H4(Py)H5(Py)
OH
Py Ph
Figure S1: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) of ppy-COOH.
7.57.67.77.87.98.08.18.28.38.48.58.68.78.8 ppm
1.04
1.06
3.14
2.10
1.00
4.14.24.34.44.54.6 ppm
2.111
1.21.31.41.5 ppm
3.145
NCOOEt
6
5
4 3 2 3
56
H6(Py)
H5(Ph)H3(Ph) H6(Ph)
H2(Ph)H3(Py)
H4(Py)H5(Py)
Ester-CH3Ester-CH2
Py Ph
Figure S2: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) of ppy-COOEt.
- 4 -
Ir
N
N
N
H3CH2COOCCOOCH2CH3
COOCH2CH326
54
3
2
3 5 65
3
3'
6'5'
Ph
Py
(PF6)
9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0Chemical Shift (ppm)
1.912.014.036.324.012.00
4.8 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0 3Chemical Shift (ppm)
4.063.99
1.50 1.45 1.40 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20Chemical Shift (ppm)
6.226.02
dceb ester CH2 ppy ester CH2dceb ester CH3 ppy ester CH3
H3, H3’(dceb)H5(Ph1)H5(Ph2)
H5(Py1)H5(Py2)
H6, H6’(dceb)H4(Py1)H4(Py2)H2(Ph1)H2(Ph2)
H3(Ph1)H3(Ph2)H6(Py1)H6(Py2)
H5, H5’(dceb)H3(Py1)H3(Py2)
Figure S3: 1H NMR(Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dceb)](PF6)
9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0F2 Chemical Shift (ppm)
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
F1
Ch
em
ica
l Sh
ift (
pp
m)
Figure S4: COSY NMR (Acetonitrile-d3, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dceb)](PF6)
- 5 -
29 1.28 1.27 1.26 1.25 1.24 1.23 1.22 1.21 1.20 1.19 1.18 1.17Chemical Shift (ppm)
6.00
1.21
1.23
1.25
IrN
N
N
H3CH2COOC
65
4
3
3'
4'5'6'2
65
4
3
2
3 5Ph
Py
(PF6)
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0Chemical Shift (ppm)
1.852.022.032.041.992.114.064.062.00
H5(Ph)H2(Ph)
H3(Ph)H3,H3’(bpy)
H4,H4’(bpy)
H3(Py)H5,H5’(bpy)
H5(Py)
H6(Py)H6,H6’(bpy)
H4(Py)
4.25 4.20 4.15 4.10Chemical Shift (ppm)
3.99
Ester-CH2
Ester-CH3
Figure S5: 1H NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpy)](PF6)
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0F2 Chemical Shift (ppm)
6.8
6.9
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.7
F1
Che
mic
al S
hift
(pp
m)
Figure S6: 2D COSY NMR(Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpy)](PF6)
- 6 -
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0Chemical Shift (ppm)
1.901.931.902.001.923.922.172.001.72
4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3Chemical Shift (ppm)
4.558.264.61
1.40 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.10 1.05 1.00Chemical Shift (ppm)
18.60
H3(dpb)H3’(dpb)
H5(dpb)H5’(dpb)
H5(Py1)H5(Py2)
H5(Ph1)H5(Ph2)
H6(dpb)H6’(dpb)H2(Ph1)H2(Ph2)
H3(Py1)H3(Py2)
H4(Py1)H4(Py2)
H6(Py1)H6(Py2)
H3(Ph1)H3(Ph2)
ppy ester CH2 dpb ester CH2
dpb P-CH2
ppy ester CH3dpb ester CH3
Figure S7: 1H NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dpb)](PF6)
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0F2 Chemical Shift (ppm)
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
F1
Che
mic
al S
hift
(ppm
)
Figure S8: COSY NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dpb)](PF6)
- 7 -
Ir
N
N
N
H3CH2COOC
Br2
65
4
3
2
3 5 6'5'
4'
3'
3
46
Ph
Py
(PF6)
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0Chemical Shift (ppm)
0.950.972.061.033.071.006.393.101.041.041.05
4.25 4.20 4.15 4.10Chemical Shift (ppm)
4.15
1.28 1.27 1.26 1.25 1.24 1.23 1.22 1.21 1.20 1.19 1.18Chemical Shift (ppm)
6.40
Ester-CH2 Ester-CH3
H5(Py1)H5(Py2)
H5(Ph1),H5(Ph2)
H5(5Brbpy)
H6(Py2)H3
H3’
H4’H3(Py1)H3(Py2)H4(5Brbpy)
H6’H6(5Brbpy)
H4(Py1)H4(Py2)
H3(Ph1)H3(Ph2)H6(Py1)
H2(Ph1)H2(Ph2)
Ester (1)
Ester (2)
Figure S9: 1H NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(5Brbpy)](PF6)
ppm
6.86.97.07.17.27.37.47.57.67.77.87.98.08.18.28.38.48.58.6 ppm
6.8
7.0
7.2
7.4
7.6
7.8
8.0
8.2
8.4
8.6
Figure S10: COSY NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(5Brbpy)](PF6)
- 8 -
PR22-2010.220.ESP
4.30 4.25 4.20 4.15 4.10 4.05Chemical Shift (ppm)
4.24
4.16
4.174.17
4.19
4.21
30 1.25 1.20Chemical Shift (ppm)
6.58
1.2
11
.21
1.2
21
.23
1.2
41
.24
IrN
N
N
N
H3CH2COOC
26
54
3
2
3 5 6
5
4
3
3'
4'6'
3''
4''5''
6''
Ph
Py
(PF6)
Ester-CH2
Ester-CH3
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0Chemical Shift (ppm)
H5(Ph1)
H5(Ph2)H3(Ph1)H3(Ph2)
H2(Ph2)H2(Ph1)
H3’ H4’
H6’’ H5’’
H5(Py1)H5(Py2)
H6’
H3(Py1)H3(Py2)H4(bpp)
H6(bpp)
H4(Py1)H4(Py2)
H5(bpp)
H6(Py1)
H4’’H6(Py2)
H3(bpp)
H3’’
-CH3(1)
-CH3(2)
Figure S11: 1H NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpp)](PF6) p
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0F2 Chemical Shift (ppm)
6.7
6.8
6.9
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.8
8.9
F1
Che
mic
al S
hift
(pp
m)
Figure S12: COSY NMR (Acetonitrile-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpp)](PF6)
- 9 -
9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0Chemical Shift (ppm)
H5(Ph1)H5(Ph2)
H5(Py1)H5(Py2)
H3(Py1)H3(Py2)
H2(Ph1)H2(Ph2)
H3(Ph1)H3(Ph2)H6(Py1)H6(Py2)
H4(Py1)H4(Py2)(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
Figure S13: Chemical shifts of protons (ppy-COOEt) in different iridium complexes. 1H
NMR(Aceteonitrile-d3, 400 MHz); (A) [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dceb)](PF6) ; (B) [Ir(ppy-
COOEt)2(bpy)](PF6) ; (C) [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dpb)](PF6)
; (D) [Ir(ppy-
COOEt)2(5Brbpy)](PF6) ; (E) [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpp)](PF6).
- 10 -
10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5Chemical Shift (ppm)
H5(Ph1)H5(Ph2)
H5(Ph3)H5(Ph4)
H3(Py3)H3(Py4)
H3(Py1)H3(Py2)
H6(Py3)H6(Py4)
H6(Py1)H6(Py2)
H4(Py1)H4(Py2)
H4(Py3)H4(Py4)
H5(Py1)H5(Py2)
H5(Py1)H5(Py2)
H2(Ph3)H2(Ph4)
H2(Ph1)H2(Ph2)
H3(Ph3)H3(Ph4)
H3(Ph1)H3(Ph2)
SEP17-2010.180.ESP
4.20 4.15 4.10 4.05 4.00 3.95Chemical Shift (ppm)
8.00
4.0
54
.06
4.0
74.0
7
4.0
84
.09
4.1
0
4.1
2
4.1
4
MSO SEP17-2010.180.ESP
1.22 1.21 1.20 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.16 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.12 1.11 1.10 1.Chemical Shift (ppm)
11.37
1.1
4
1.1
4
1.1
61.1
6
1.1
8
1.1
8
Figure S14: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2Cl]2
250 300 350 400 450 500 5500.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Ab
s/n
m
Wavelength/nm
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2Cl]
2
452413365
Figure S15a: UV-Vis spectra of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2Cl]2 was recorded in acetonitrile at room
temperature. Concentration of the solution is ~10-5 M.
- 11 -
250 300 350 400 450 500 5500.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
350 400 450 500 5500.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Ab
sorp
tio
n (
a.u
.)
Wavelength (nm)
1a 1b 1c 1d 1e
Ab
so
rpti
on
(a.
u.)
Wavelength (nm)
Figure S15b: UV-Vis spectra of Iridium complexes, recorded in acetonitrile at room
temperature. Concentration of the solution is ~10-5 M.
- 12 -
0.000000 0.000002 0.000004 0.000006 0.000008 0.000010-0.05
-0.04
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
Vo
lts
Time(sec)
[{Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(Cl)}
2]
Figure S16: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(µ-Cl)]2. Life time
experiment was recorded in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature.
0.0000000 0.0000004 0.0000008 0.0000012 0.0000016 0.0000020-0.05
-0.04
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
Vo
lts
Time(sec)
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpy)](PF
6)
Figure S17: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpy)](PF6). Life
time experiment was recorded in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature.
- 13 -
0.0000000 0.0000004 0.0000008 0.0000012 0.0000016 0.0000020
-0.040
-0.035
-0.030
-0.025
-0.020
-0.015
-0.010
-0.005
0.000
Vol
ts
Time(sec)
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpp)].PF
6
Figure S18: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(bpp)](PF6). Life
time experiment was recorded in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature.
0.0000000 0.0000004 0.0000008 0.0000012 0.0000016 0.0000020-0.05
-0.04
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
Vo
lts
time(sec)
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(5Brbpy)].PF
6
Figure S19: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(5Brbpy)](PF6).
Life time experiment was recorded in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature.
- 14 -
0.0000000 0.0000004 0.0000008 0.0000012 0.0000016 0.0000020-0.040
-0.035
-0.030
-0.025
-0.020
-0.015
-0.010
-0.005
0.000
Vo
lts
Time(sec)
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dpb)].PF
6
Figure S20: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dpb)](PF6). Life
time experiment was recorded in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature.
0.0000000 0.0000004 0.0000008 0.0000012 0.0000016 0.0000020-0.05
-0.04
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
Vo
lts
Time(sec)
[Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dceb)].PF
6
Figure S21: Life time experiment and kinetic fit graph of [Ir(ppy-COOEt)2(dceb)](PF6). Life
time experiment was recorded in nitrogen purged DCM solution at room temperature.
- 15 -
4,4’-Bis(diethylmethylphophonato)-2,2’-bipyridine (dpb)1
1.7 g (4.97 mmol) of 4,4’-dimethylbromo-2,2-bipyridine in 11.3 cm3 chloroform was refluxed
with 24.17 cm3 of triethylphosphite under a nitrogen atmosphere for 3 hours. Excess
triethylphosphite and chloroform were removed under high vacuum. After the removal of
solvent and excess triethylphosphite, an oily crude product was obtained which was further
washed with pentane and collected as a white solid. Yield: 92% (2.08 g, 4.57 mmol). 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 1.21 (m, 12 H), 3.20 (d, 20 Hz, 4H), 3.96 - 4.06 (m, 8 H),
7.29 (d, J = 5.05, 2 H), 8.31 (s, 2 H), 8.55 (d, J = 5.05 Hz, 2 H) . 31P NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
ppm 34.17 ppm.
5-bromo-2,2’-bipyridine (5Brbpy) 2-6
0.299 gm (0.258 mmol) of Pd(PPh3)4 and 2 g (8.44 mmol) of 2,5-dibromobipyridine were
added to a dried two neck round bottom flask under nitrogen atmosphere. The temperature
was kept low using ice bath during the addition of 19.35 ml (8.4 mmol) of 2-pyridylzinc
bromide to the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was then stirred for 12 hours at room
temperature under nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was then poured into a
saturated aqueous solution of EDTA/Na2CO3 until some yellow flakes appear. The aqueous
mixture was extracted with dichloromethane and dried over MgSO4. Dichloromethane was
evaporated in air and the crude product was purified by alumina column using hexane/ethyl
acetate (9:1) as eluent. Yield: 1.57 g (6.67 mmol, 79.5%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ
ppm 7.49 (dd, J = 7.45, 4.80 Hz, 1 H), 7.97 (td, J = 7.71, 7.71 Hz, 1 H), 8.20 (dd, J = 8.46,
2.40 Hz, 1 H), 8.30 - 8.39 (m, 2 H), 8.67 - 8.73 (m, 1 H), 8.82 (d J = 2.40, 1 H)
2,2':5',2''-terpyridine (bpp)7
0.299 g (0.258 mmol) of [Pd(PPh3)4] and 2 g (8.44 mmol) of 2,5-dibromobipyridine were
added to a two necked round bottom flask under a nitrogen atmosphere. 38.7 cm3 (16.8
mmol) of 2-pyridylzincbromide (in THF) was then added to the flask under a nitrogen
atmosphere. The reaction mixture was then stirred for 15 hours in the dark at 200C under
nitrogen atmosphere. Subsequently the reaction mixture was poured into a saturated aqueous
solution of EDTA/Na2CO3. The aqueous solution was extracted with dichloromethane and
the organic layer was dried over MgSO4. The solvent was evaporated in air and the crude
product was purified on a neutral alumina column using hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1) as mobile
phase. Yield: 1.57 g (6.75 mmol, 80%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm 7.46 (dd, J =
- 16 -
7.58, 4.80 Hz, 1 H), 7.50 (dd, J = 6.69, 5.43, 1.01 Hz, 1 H), 7.98 (d, J = 7.58 Hz, 2H), 8.16 (d,
J = 8.08 Hz, 1 H), 8.47 (d, J = 8.08 Hz, 1 H), 8.52 (d, J = 8.34 Hz, 1 H), 8.63 (d, J = 8.34 Hz,
1 H), 8.70 - 8.78 (m, 2 H), 9.40 (d, J = 2.27 Hz, 1 H). Elemental analysis for C20H14N4: M.W.
= 233.26; Calc. C 77.23, H 4.75, N 18.01, Found. C 77.07, H 4.77 and N 18.25%.
Quantum Yield Measurements:
Following equation was used to calculate the emission quatum yield for all the complexes
both in aerated and deaerated acetonitrile.
Φs = Φr (Is / Ir) . (Ar / As)
Where Φs is the quantum yield of the sample. Φr is the quantum yield of the reference
complex. Is and Ir represent points of maximum intensity. Ar and As represent the
absorbance value of the complex and reference at the excitation wavelength. [Ru(bpy)2]Cl2 is
used as refernce for both aerated ( Փ = 0.02) and deaerated samples in acetonitrile solvent
(Փ = 0.06).8
Experimental conditions for photocatalytic hydrogen: Photocatalytic hydrogen production experiments were carried out using an air-cooling
apparatus for maintaining the solutions at room temperature at 22 ͦ C, during irradiation using
LEDs (355 and 470 nm). Acetonitrile used was dried over calcium hydride and the
triethylamine dried over sodium before being freshly distilled under nitrogen. The samples
were prepared in GC vials (4.9 ml volume, VWR) with a known headspace of 2.9 ml.
Photosensitiser (Iridium complexes) and catalyst K2[PtCl4] were taken in 1:1 ratio and
dissolved in 4:1 Acetonitrile/H2O solution containing 1.2 x 10-4 M of PS. 1.91 ml of the Ir/Pt
solution and 90 µL of 0.5 M triethylamine were added to the GC vials under argon
atmosphere. Subsequently, the GC vials containing 2 ml samples were irradiated with 355
and 470 nm wavelength LED’s for 18 hours. After irradiation, 100 μL samples were drawn
from the headspace and injected into the GC apparatus. The experiments were repeated two
times.
1. I. Gillaizeau-Gauthier, F. Odobel, M. Alebbi, R. Argazzi, E. Costa, C. A. Bignozzi, P.
Qu and G. J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 6073-6079. 2. Q. Liu, H. Duan, X. Luo, Y. Tang, G. Li, R. Huang and A. Lei, Adv. Syn. Cat., 2008,
350, 1349-1354. 3. Y.-Q. Fang and G. S. Hanan, Synlett, 2003, 2003, 0852,0854. 4. A. Lützen and M. Hapke, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 2002, 2292-2297.
- 17 -
5. J. E. Milne and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 13028-13032. 6. U. Kiehne, J. Bunzen, H. Staats and A. Lutzen, Synthesis, 2007, 1061-1069. 7. S. Soman, G. Singh Bindra, A. Paul, R. Groarke, J. C. Manton, F. M. Connaughton,
M. Schulz, D. Dini, C. Long, M. T. Pryce and J. G. Vos, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 12678-12680.
8. M. S. Lowry, W. R. Hudson, R. A. Pascal and S. Bernhard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 14129-14135.