carboy cycle dynamics in oregon and western us
TRANSCRIPT
Carbon cycle dynamics in Oregon and Western US
Beverly Law
Oregon State University
Carbon cycle dynamics within Oregon’s urban-suburban-forested-agricultural landscapes Part 1: Current Land-Use/Land-CoverPI: B.E. Law, CoIs: C. Still, T. Hilker, A. Schmidt
Objective
• Multi-scale observations and neural networks to determine how current climate and LC/LUC influence ecosystem processes
Approach
• Establish flux sites in major crops and poplar
• Compare seasonal and annual fluxes among cover types
Project # OREZFES-867
Flux Measurements in Crops, Poplar for Comparisons and Modeling
Annual Fluxes – Forests, Crops, Poplar
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2008 2009 2010
NEP (g C m-2 yr-1)
Mature Douglas-fir Mature Ponderosa Pine
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
winter wheat tall fescue poplar
NEP (gC m-2 yr-1)
Willamette Valley Biocycle Farm
Annual Carbon Budget for OregonInitial Estimates
Source
Sector
Fossil Fuels Forest NECB Crop NECB
Tg
CO
2 y
r-1
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
Land-based carbon sink is ~30% of the equivalent of Oregon’s FFE
(Inventories, Flux sites, Ancillary Plots, Satellite Land Cover & Fire Emissions)
Carbon cycle dynamics within Oregon’s urban-suburban-forested-agricultural landscapes: Part 2 Future Climate & Land-Use/Land-Cover PI: B.E. Law, CoIs: C. Still, T. Hilker, A. Schmidt (Oregon State University), Collaborator: T. Hudiburg (UI)
Objective
• Investigate future climate variability and effects of land cover and land use changes on terrestrial processes
Approach
• Reduce uncertainties in CLM projections
• Simulate future climate effects on ecosystem processes
• Simulate thinning of vulnerable forests, LUC non-forage crop to poplar
Project # OREZFES-868
Model underestimated NEP in high biomass forests L: Difference between prior and posteriori NEPR: Current non-forage grass crops
Land Cover Willamette Valley
Vegetation Type / Crops
Alfalfa
Apples
Barley
Barren
Blueberries
Broccoli
Buckwheat
Cabbage
Caneberries
Cauliflower
Cherries
Christmas Trees
Clover/Wildflowers
Corn
Cucumbers
Dbl Crop WinWht/Corn
Deciduous Forest
Developed/High Intensity
Developed/Low Intensity
Developed/Med Intensity
Developed/Open Space
Dry Beans
Evergreen Forest
Fallow/Idle Cropland
Flaxseed
Garlic
Grapes
Grass/Pasture
Greens
Herbaceous Wetlands
Herbs
Hops
Mint
Misc Vegs & Fruits
Mixed Forest
Mustard
Oats
Onions
Open Water
Other Crops
Other Hay/Non Alfalfa
Other Tree Crops
Peaches
Pears
Peas
Peppers
Perennial Ice/Snow
Plums
Potatoes
Pumpkins
Radishes
Rape Seed
Rye
Shrubland
Sod/Grass Seed
Sorghum
Spring Wheat
Squash
Strawberries
Sugarbeets
Sunflower
Sweet Corn
Triticale
Turnips
Vetch
Walnuts
Winter Wheat
Woody Wetlands
Conversion from Coal to Bioenergy – Oregon
~3 Tg torrefied biomass per year needed to run 518 MW power plant at base load
Optimize for minimizing impacts on forests, sustainable supply
Future C Stocks and Emissions – Oregon
In progress:
NECB and C stocks in forests post-thinning
NECB and C stocks on agr land if convert 150K ha non-forage grass to poplar (100% conversion unlikely).
Maximum potential supply of biomass to electric facility, and uncertainties
Refine Life Cycle Assessment of emissions from land post-harvest, transport, torrefaction, pelletization, fossil fuel displacement
Assessment of effects of LUC to poplar on carbon and water cycle
Forest Die-off, Climate Change, and Human Intervention in Western North AmericaPI: P. Mote, Co-lead PI: B.E. Law (OSU) Co-Is: A. Plantinga (UC-SB), J. Hicke (UI)
Objectives
• Improve ability to predict mortality
• Map vulnerability of forests to mortality under present and future climate
• Assess & reduce uncertainty in forecast
Approach
• CLM: Drought- and beetle-related mortality
• Economic model to optimize thinning of vulnerable forests
• Life Cycle Assessment
Project #:OREW-2013-00628
(Berner et al. in rev)NASA fellowship
Forest Biomass Mortality – Western US (2002-2012)
Negative water balance is the dominant driver of mortality in the W US
Dry ecoregions were exposed to below-average water availability for longer duration
(Berner & Law 2015)
Water availability
Biomassdensity
(Berner et al. BGD 2016)
Water Availability Mean Over Western US (1985-2014)
Mean Magnitude (kg * m-1 s-1)60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130L
oc
ati
on
of
Ma
xim
um
Mo
istu
re T
ran
sp
ort
(la
titu
de N
)
36
38
40
42
44
46
11 Yr Mean
Perturbed Physics Default Physics setting1 Standard DeviationReanalysis Datasets
Simulated Moisture Transport over NE Pacific
Aim: Parameterize global model to bring correct amount of moisture into western boundary of regional model
Default: Location of the jet is too far N and not enough moisture
Several parameter sets improve jet location and moisture transport