case study 1 (q4)

24
Study Case 4 GROUP MEMBERS : Nur Faten bt Abu Samah 0919308 Nurul Alia Aqilah bt Samiun 0910124 Norhafatini bt Aziz 0917272 Nur Syafiqa bt Mohd Zulkefli

Upload: wan-hazirah

Post on 26-May-2015

585 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

Study Case 4

GROUP MEMBERS :

Nur Faten bt Abu Samah 0919308Nurul Alia Aqilah bt Samiun 0910124Norhafatini bt Aziz 0917272Nur Syafiqa bt Mohd Zulkefli 0915972Nur Athirah bt Amran 0918654

Page 2: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

A 16 years old, Indian boy alleged with MVA. He was admitted to hospital with acute subdural hematoma. Decompressive craniectomy has been done and patient was referred to dietitian for enteral Ryle’s tube feeding regime.

Page 3: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

MVA (Motor vehicle accident )

Major cause of internal and external injury

Motor vehicle accident injuries are as a direct result of the force of the impact and the biomechanics of injury. 

Most motor vehicle accidents are the typical hyperextension flexion injuries, or more commonly known as "whiplash" injuries.

Page 4: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

Acute subdural hematomas

the result of a serious head injury tiny veins between the surface of the

brain and its outer covering (the dura) stretch and tear, allowing blood to collect.

The bleeding fills the brain area very rapidly, compressing brain tissue.

This often results in brain injury and may lead to death.

Page 5: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

Decompressive Craniectomy

the removal of a large area of skull to increase the potential volume of the cranial cavity

aiming at reduction of raised intracranial pressure.

At the beginning of the last century, Kocher asserted that "if there is no CSF pressure, but brain pressure exists, then pressure relief must be achieved by opening the skull."

Page 6: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

Ryle’s tube feedingo nasogastric enteral feeding (adult

feeding or stomach tube)

Page 7: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

ANTHROPOMETRY DATA Height: 1.63m

Weight : 51kg

BMI-for-age percentiles (Boys, 2 to 20 years)

= 25th percentiles ( normal)

Page 8: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

OBJECTIVE To provide suitable enteral feeding

product To preserve lean body mass To increase protein synthesis To improve immune and muscle function To promote rapid recovery To shorten hospital stay To reduce the risk of morbidity

Page 9: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

PRINCIPLES By providing suitable enteral product to

achieve adequate calories and energy intake

By giving high protein intake up to 1.5g/kg body weight to promote wound healing

By educate patient and caregiver about hygiene and sanitation of enteral feeding

Page 10: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

IMPLEMENTATION Elevate the head of the bed 30 to 45

degree during feeding and 30 to 60 minutes after bolus feeding.

Tube feeding should be routinely flush with 20 to 30 ml of water to prevent of occlution.

Page 11: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

BIOCHEMICAL DATA   Value Indication Normal value

Sodium 137 mmol/L Normal 135-150 mmol/L

Potassium 3.9 mmol/ L Normal 3.5-5.1 mmol / L

Urea 5.0 mmol/L Normal 2.9-7.9 mmol/L

Creatinine 44 µmol/L Normal 35-132

µmol/L

Albumin 39 g/L Normal 35-50 g/L

Total

protein

70 g/L Normal 60-80 g/L

Page 12: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

NUTRITIONAL DIAGNOSIS (PES)

High protein requirement as related to acute subdural hematoma as

evidence by post operative surgery

Page 13: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

 OBJECTIVE & PRINCIPLE

Objective Principle

1. To provide Consume high biological value protein food per day such as animal derived food : meat, chicken, fish

2. To minimize weight loss • Consume adequate calorie and nutritionally balance food per day• Avoid skipping meal

3. To prevent infection Consume adequate intake of micronutrients to increase immune system

4. To inculcate hygiene practise To educate patient and caregiver on hygiene of the tube by flushing with 30 ml of water before and after feeding.

Page 14: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

NUTRITION INTERVENTION Calculation of Energy Requirements

BMI= 19.19 Weight = 51kg Height = 163cm Age= 16 years old

Harris – Benedict calculationsTEE = 66.5 + 13.8(W) + 5(H) – 6.8(A) = 66.5 + 13.8(51) + 5(163) – 6.8(16) = 1476.5 kcal/dayBEE = 1476.5 × AF × IF

= 1476.5 × 1.2 × 1.3 = 2303.34 kcal/day

* AF= 1.2 (in bed) IF=1.3 (major surgery)

Page 15: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

WHO FormulaBEE = 17.5 (W) + 651

= 17.5 (51) + 651 = 1543.5 kcal/day

Average calorie intake = 2303.34 + 1543.5 2 = 1923.42 kcal/day ~ 2000

kcal/day 

Page 16: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

CHO = 55 x 2000 = 1100 100 4= 275 g

PRO = 1.5 g/kg x 5.1 kg = 76.5 g x 4 x 100 2000= 15.3 %

Fat = 100% - 15.3% - 50%= 29.7 x 2000 = 594 100 9= 66 g

Page 17: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

Step 1

Perative (RTU)

50 ml 3 hr / 8x /d

kcal = 50 ml x 8= 400 x 1.3= 520 kcal

CHO = 0.1772 g x 50 ml= 8.86 x 8= 70.88 g

Page 18: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

PRO = 0.0666 g x 50 ml= 3.33 g x 8= 26.64 g

Fat = 0.0374 g x 50 ml= 1.87 g x 8= 14.96 g

If pt can tolerate 1-2 feeding, go to step 2

Page 19: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

Step 2

Perative (RTU)

100 ml 3 hr / 8x /d

kcal = 100 ml x 8 = 800 ml x 1.3 kcal = 1040 kcal

CHO = 0.1772 g x 100 ml = 17.72 g x 8 = 141.76 g

Page 20: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

PRO = 0.0666 g x1500 ml= 6.66 g x 8= 53.28 g

Fat = 0.0374 g x 100 ml= 3.74 g x 8= 29.92 g

If pt can tolerate 1-2 feeding, go to step 3

Page 21: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

Step 3

Perative (RTU)

150 ml 3 hr / 8x /d

kcal = 150 ml x 8= 1200 ml x 1.3 kcal= 1560 kcal

CHO = 0.1772 g x 150 ml= 26.58 g x 8= 212.64 g

Page 22: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

PRO = 0.0666 g x150 ml= 9.99 g x 8= 79.92 g

Fat = 0.0374 g x 150 ml= 5.61 g x 8= 44.88 g

Page 23: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

Add Modular formula = MCT oil to increase calorie intake per day without increase protein intake.

10 ml 6 x/d

Kcal = 10 ml x 7.7 kcal= 77kcal x 6= 462 kcal

Fat = 0.98 g/ml x 10 ml= 9.8 g x 6= 58.8 g

Page 24: CASE STUDY 1 (Q4)

Thus , 150 ml Perative (8 times/day) + 10 ml MCT oil (6 times/day) resulting :

Total calorie = 1560 kcal + 462 kcal

= 2022 kcal

Total CHO = 212.64 g

Total PRO = 79.92 g

Total Fat = 44.8 g + 58.8 g

= 103.68 g

* Before and after feeding, flush with 30 ml water