PALM OIL PIRACYPrepared By:NorMALA HamZahMarDEWI YuHana

MAF 680 CASE STUDY 2MAF 680*

MAF 680

Problems:Poor Quality of CPO delivered by PHSBMight Lost Contract

MAF 680*

MAF 680

issueAnalysis/ImplicationRecommendationMAF 680*

MAF 680

issueAnalysis/ImplicationRecommendationMAF 680*

MAF 680

issueAnalysis/ImplicationRecommendationMAF 680*

MAF 680

issueAnalysis/ImplicationRecommendationMAF 680*

MAF 680

APPENDIX A : TURNOVER VS COMPENSATIONMAF 680*

YEAR2006200720082009RMRMRMRMREVENUE17,555,33319,322,44320,433,86524,876,333COMPENSATION345,111645,2221,567,5542,064,333

MAF 680

Chart1

0.01965847070.03339237870.07671353410.0829838144

2006

2007

2008

2009

Sheet1

2006200720082009

PERCENTAGE (%) INCREMENT OF COMPENSATION COMPARED WITH REVENUE1.97%3.34%7.67%8.30%

To update the chart, enter data into this table. The data is automatically saved in the chart.

MAF 680*APPENDIX A : TURNOVER VS COMPENSATION

Year 2006200720082009Turnover 17,555,333 19,322,443 20,433,865 24,876,333 Net Profit 1,803,110 1,248,533 669,257 (1,818,137)

MAF 680

Chart1

17555333193224432043386524876333

18031101248533669257-1818137

2006

2007

2008

2009

Sheet1

2006200720082009

Turnover$17,555,333$19,322,443$20,433,865$24,876,333

Net Profit$1,803,110$1,248,533$669,257$(1,818,137)

To update the chart, enter data into this table. The data is automatically saved in the chart.

**