case study for importance of feasibility study

8/19/2019 Case Study for Importance of Feasibility Study

1/44


2/44

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

AIM

To present a case study on the importance of a

feasibility study in a construction project

OBJECTIVES

1. To obtain an official feasibility study pertain

construction project2. To perform a case study on the importan

feasibility study in relation to the above3. To present the case study


3/44

FEASIBILITY STUDY

BRIEF DESCRIPTION

•+''e''ment o& t$e viailit and %ract

o& a %ro%o'ed %ro*ect•+ &ea'iilit 'tud attem%t' toim%artiall and logicall determine t$e'trengt$' and ea.ne''e' o& ane/i'ting u'ine'' or more commonl a%ro%o'ed venture o%%ortunitie' andinconvenience' %re'ent in t$e

environment t$e re'ource' reuired t


4/44

Reference

document

http://www.eib.org/attachments/pipeline/201103

!esia!en.pdf

http://www.eib.org/attachments/pipeline/20110361_esia_en.pdfhttp://www.eib.org/attachments/pipeline/20110361_esia_en.pdfhttp://www.eib.org/attachments/pipeline/20110361_esia_en.pdfhttp://www.eib.org/attachments/pipeline/20110361_esia_en.pdf


5/44

Identiction nd de!cri"tof re concerned ! "er t

fe!i$i%it& !tud&


6/44

'ro(ect

(u!tiction

"nvestment in the transport sector tends to

#educe transport costs• $ower mar%et prices• & spatial e'tension of the mar%et

• (igher mobility

Thereby improving access to economic opportun

)oreover road or.' im%l t$e creation o&em%loment contriuting to a reduction o&


7/44

The Nort$ern Corridor oute i' e/treim%ortant &or ot$ ganda and i

neig$our'

The government of *ganda &+, its internati

development partners therefore invested substa

to its up%eep and improvement

(owever- due to increasing traffic volume and

economic growth it becomes necessary to pr

diversion for heavy and long distance traffic

traffic jams

This lead to the formulation of this y

project with a survey positively

ac%nowledging public support 3 o

sample4


8/44

+4#EN+#EP!P!,+4

5easibility studies allows considering different options in order to cho

one.

The factors that affect the choice are:• 6ngineering aspect of the project

• The structure and management of the project

• The funds re7uired to reali8e this projects

• 9ultural and social aspects considered

• The safety factors related to project

• rofitability &nalysis

•

6nvironment aspects


9/44

+4#EN+#E P!P!,+4 ! #6E C,#7YThe &nalysis of the alternatives was based on:

• Traffic volume considerations

• 6conomic rowth rojects and &ssumptions

• otential shifts a way from +;T

• 6conomic 9onsiderations


10/44

Nort$ern+lternative

o%tion

Nort$ern,$ort o%tion ,o

long

,out$ern

o%tion

8ero

o%tion


11/44

9E,#P!P!,+4

The short alignment option +orth was chosen as the best option compared

other three option based on the following advantages:

The construction cost was lower of all the four option

"t was the shortest route

ased on its path line- it was the route that re7uires the least land ta%e

resent minimal negative social and environmental impacts

"t is the route whereby least demolition of building is re7uired if any4

#oute where gentlest vertical alignment can be designed

The only major drainage structure is the bridge across #ui8i #iver

&nd it also has the potential serving traffic to and from %asese.


12/44

'ROJECT AREADESCRI'TION

Bio"#&!ic% Condition!'ro(ect Are

Settin)

7etail' aoutt$e land area

altoget$er

it$ t$e%o%ulation

den'it

*eo%o)&

eologicaloutline o&t$e land

e2g2 t%e'o& roc.'%re'ent

C%imte

e2g2amount

o& rain&alland t$eirduration

+ter ,

Pollutioni' 'tudiell a'

e;ect'

con'truor. o

ater

'ROJECT AREA


13/44


6conomic activities

The surrounding is composed of semiurban and rural peasantry wi

livestoc% and crop farming which is one of the major income of the

inhabitants.

Socio- economic !ettin)

overty and food of the households e'perienced food shortage

9auses of poverty are : inade7uate poverty- land shortage- poor fa

methods or gender ine7uality amongst others.


14/44


Ve)ettion c#rcteri!tic!P$'ical 'etting' in t$e'elected region' a'

documented &rom ot$literature revie and


15/44

ACTIVITIES

The project entails the following activities during its speci

phrases. These include:

&. &lignment Test pit field "nvestigations thic%nesses of

is %nown as well as the visual description carried out.

are collected for further properties.

. orings at #wi8i river 9rossings one should be carrie

one of the bridge abutment.9. ,ynamic 9one enetrometer testing ? calculate the 9

strength

,. )aterials 5ield "nvestigations ? "dentification of possi

borrow and 7uarry areas


16/44

ROAD 'ROJECT DESI*N 'ROCESACTIVITIES

6. 9onstruction ased &ctivities ? these activities include

9learing of vegetation along hori8ontal alignment 9ut and fill to change vertical alignment

9onstruction of bridge

Transportation of soil and other construction materials- am

others.

5. 5acilities- )aterials- e7uipment and "nstallations

.


17/44

#6E E,I+ ,#7Y

12 ationale and Pur%o'e o& t$e E,I+

• Management and 'u'tainailit o&environmental and natural re'ource'

• Evaluation o& economic &actor'

=2 Met$odolog &or %re%aration o& t$e E• ,co%ing

• 4iterature evie


18/44

#6E E,I+ ,#7Y (Contd

• 6ou'e$old ,ocio-Economic ,urve aPartici%ator 'ta.e$older' Meeting'

• Ecological inve'tigation'

• >ater ?ualit +nal'i'

• Ecological Evaluation'

• Value o& ,tanding ,toc.

• 7i'counted value o& current and &utu

'tandin 'toc.


19/44

#6E E,I+ ,#7Y (Contd

•

Value o& caron 'eue'tration %oten• Value o& iodiver'it

• Value o& 4and #a.e

• Value o& uniue environmental 'ervi

• Incremental Management Co't'

• #otal Economic Im%lication'

• P$'ical-cultural re'ource'


20/44

P94IC C!N,4#+#I!N

12 !vervie o& t$e Pulic Con'ultationProce''

• 6ig$lig$t' o& t$e %roceeding' o&,ta.e$older' and Communit

Con'ultative Meeting'• Communit Meeting' and 6ou'e$old

Intervie'

P94IC C!N,4#+#I!N


21/44

P94IC C!N,4#+#I!N(Contd)

=2 Emerging i''ue' ari'ing &rom PulicCon'ultation'

• ,%eci


22/44

IN,#I##I!N+4

+ME>!A 12 Polic rameor.• #$e National #ran'%ort Ma'ter Plan• #$e National Environment ManagementPolic 1BB@

• #$e National >ater Polic 1BBB•ganda' Vi'ion =0=5

• #$e National ender Polic 1BBD

• #$e National 6IV+I7, Polic =00@


23/44

IN,#I##I!N+4

+ME>!A • ,ectoral Polic 'tatement' and

uideline' &or Main'treaming Cro''-Cutting Concern'

• E,I+ uideline' &or oad ,u-,ector

=00F• Mo># eneral ,%eci# ,u-,ector Polic ,tatement'


24/44

IN,#I##I!N+4+ME>!A =2 4egal rameor.

• National 4egal rameor.

• #$e Con'titution o& t$e e%ulic o&ganda 1BB5

• #$e National Environmental +ct Ca%153

• #$e >ater +ct Ca% 15=

•

#$e 4and +ct 1BBF


25/44

IN,#I##I!N+4+ME>!A

• #$e >or.man' Com%en'ation act=000

• #$e Mining +ct o& =003

•

#$e !ccu%ational ,a&et and 6ealt$+ct (=00G)

• #$e Em%loment +ct =00G

• #$e Petroleum ,u%%l +ct =003


26/44

IN,#I##I!N+4+ME>!A

•Environmental Im%act +''e''mentegulation' 1BBF

• #$e National Environment egulation' =

•National Environment egulation' 1BBB

32 In'titutional rameor.

•National In'titutional rameor.

• #$e National Environment Management+ut$orit


27/44

IN,#I##I!N+4+ME>!A

• National ore't +ut$orit

• 4ocal overnment'

• 4ocal Environmental Committee'

• oad Committee'@2 In'titutional Coordination


28/44

@T6+T"&$

")&9T< &+,

)"T"&T"@+)6&


29/44

• "t is important to assess the environmental an

social impacts during and after the constructi

phase of the project.

• The mitigation measures suggested can then b

ta%en into account during the planning anddesign stage.


30/44

9lassification o& Im%act'

9an be classified as indirect or direct.

• ,irect impact are effects that arises from activities

form an integral part of the project

•

"ndirect impact are effects that arises from activitiedirectly and clearly forming part of the project

e'ampleA noise changes due to an increase road t

flows on e'isting roads resulting from construction


31/44

ositive "mpacts

•

#eduction in accidents and congestion in Town9entre of )barara.

• #eduction in noise level in Town 9entre.

• otential development in the around the propo

road.

+ ti " t d )iti ti )


32/44

+egative "mpacts and )itigation )easIM'ACTS Nture of

Im"ctDurtion MITI

MEA

%ta.e o& land 7irect Medium term ,en'itiHaa%ro

,torm aterconcern'

7irect 4ong term In'taCu

,oil ero'ion 7irect Medium term 9an. %'lo%e 't

Noi'e %ollution 7irect 4ong term 7acon'trure'iden


33/44

+egative "mpacts and )itigation )eaIM'ACTS Nture of

Im"ctDurtion MITI*ATION M

+ir %ollution 7irect 4ong term ,%rin.ling ate'ur&ace' ma'. &

>a'temanagement

7irect Medium term Clear %lan &or mao& %ro*ect a'te

cleaning o& cam

a''ociated &a

7egradation o&ater ualit

7irect 4ong term +%%oint Contenvironmen

4o'' o& ananacro%

7irect 4ong term Com%en'ation

Environmental Manageme


34/44

Environmental Managemeand Monitoring Planning

#$e o*ective' o& t$e monitoring %rogramme ar

• Veri& t$e ado%tion o& t$e %ro%o'ed mitigationene


35/44

Environmental Management and MonitorinPlanning

#$ere are = %$a'e' &or t$e %ro*ect monitoring o%ro*ect:

• Pre-con'truction P$a'e Monitoring

• Con'truction P$a'e Monitoring

Environmental Management and Monitorin


36/44


• Pre-con'truction P$a'e MonitoringCon


37/44


• Con'truction P$a'e Monitoringevie o& t$e Contractor' %lan' met$od

'tatement' tem%orar or.' de'ign' andarrangement' relating to otaining nece''ara%%roval' &rom t$e Engineer

,'tematic o'ervation on a da-to-da a'i' o&'ite activitie' and t$e Contractor' o;'ite &aciliti

Environmental Management and Monitorin


38/44


• Environmental Monitoring Indicator' #$e monitoring %rogram i' to e a'ed on E,MP' a

NEM+ +%%roval condition' &or t$e %ro*ect a' ell a',%eci


39/44

In'titutional and ca%acit uilding arrangem

• National Environment Management +ut$orit (N

• 7i'trict Engineer' and egional Engineer'

• 7e'ign Engineer

• Contractor

• ganda National oad +ut$orit (N+) Environnit

• oad Committee'


40/44

#69@))6+,&T"@+<


41/44

• &ll parties who loss their property should

fairly compensated.

• 9ontractor should comply with l

obligations and use +ational 6nvironme

standards for emission limits.

• $eased lands used for temporary wor%s sho

be returned to rightful owner


42/44

9@+9$*


43/44

• "n this report- the strengths and wea%nesses

proposed project have been assessed.

• This includes the alternative options- ecimplications- area description- resources re7uire

estimate of the project and environment impacts.

• Bith these information- it can be decided whether it

practical to go forward with the project.

•


44/44

#eference

• UNRA. (May 2010). Feasibility Study, D

Design and Supervisin ! t"e #nstru$tin Nrt"ern #rridr Rute, Mbarara %y

(N*+N).

"ttp-///.eib.rgatta$"entspipeline20110

sia3en.pd!

case study for importance of feasibility study

Documents