case study: grazing at squam farm site...

6
Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Description Squam Farm is a 34-hectare (85-acre) property owned by Nantucket Conservation Foundation (NCF), located on the glacial moraine in the northeastern section of Nantucket. Squam Farm provided an ideal location for a long-term sheep grazing project because it had regulated vehicle access, an accessible water source, and an NCF staff member living on-site year-round. The cessation of agriculture in the 1800s initiated ecological succession on Squam Farm. Today, the property contains a high level of habitat heterogeneity, including coastal shrubland, managed grassland, deciduous hardwood swamp, mixed deciduous forest, and shrub swamp. Prior to NCF purchasing the land, some upland areas were mowed and grazed with heritage breed livestock during the 1980s and 1990s. As a result, some areas remain open and contain a diverse mixture of graminoids, forbs, vines, and shrubs. After purchasing the land, NCF mowed annually to maintain grassland habitat in these areas. Prior to this sheep grazing project, vegetation communities contained an assemblage of native sandplain grassland-associated species including little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pensylvanica) and poverty-grass (Danthonia spicata), as well as non-native, cool-season grasses such as velvet-grass (Holcus lanatus), sweet vernalgrass (Anthoxanthum odoratum), and sheep-fescue (Festuca ovina). Common forbs included grass-leaf flat-topped goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia), common St. Johns-wort (Hypericum perforatum), oxeye-daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare), common sheep sorrel (Rumex acetosella) and dwarf cinquefoil (Potentilla canadensis). These grasslands were interspersed with both native and non- native shrub and vines, including scrub oak (Quercus ilicifolia), small bayberry (Morella caroliniensis), black cherry (Prunus serotina), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), fox-grape (Vitis labrusca) and poison-ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). Further, high population densities of turtles and snakes were observed in upland areas on the property, including rare spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata). Thus, sheep grazing was initiated at this site as an alternative to mowing during the growing season because of potentially less impact on wildlife. Figure 1. Squam Farm sheep grazing experiment. Photo Credit: Nantucket Conservation Foundation.

Upload: others

Post on 02-Aug-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Descriptionsandplaingrassland.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CaseStudy_Squ… · Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Description Squam Farm

CaseStudy:GrazingatSquamFarm

SiteDescription

SquamFarmisa34-hectare(85-acre)propertyownedbyNantucketConservationFoundation(NCF),locatedontheglacialmoraineinthenortheasternsectionofNantucket.SquamFarmprovidedanideallocationforalong-termsheepgrazingprojectbecauseithadregulatedvehicleaccess,anaccessiblewatersource,andanNCFstaffmemberlivingon-siteyear-round.

Thecessationofagricultureinthe1800sinitiatedecologicalsuccessiononSquamFarm.Today,thepropertycontainsahighlevelofhabitatheterogeneity,includingcoastalshrubland,managedgrassland,deciduoushardwoodswamp,mixeddeciduousforest,andshrubswamp.PriortoNCFpurchasingtheland,someuplandareasweremowedandgrazedwithheritagebreedlivestockduringthe1980sand1990s.Asaresult,someareasremainopenandcontainadiversemixtureofgraminoids,forbs,vines,andshrubs.Afterpurchasingtheland,NCFmowedannuallytomaintaingrasslandhabitatintheseareas.

Priortothissheepgrazingproject,vegetationcommunitiescontainedanassemblageofnativesandplaingrassland-associatedspeciesincludinglittlebluestem(Schizachyriumscoparium),Pennsylvaniasedge(Carexpensylvanica)andpoverty-grass(Danthoniaspicata),aswellasnon-native,cool-seasongrassessuchasvelvet-grass(Holcuslanatus),sweetvernalgrass(Anthoxanthumodoratum),andsheep-fescue(Festucaovina).Commonforbsincludedgrass-leafflat-toppedgoldenrod(Euthamiagraminifolia),commonSt.Johns-wort(Hypericumperforatum),oxeye-daisy(Leucanthemumvulgare),commonsheepsorrel(Rumexacetosella)anddwarfcinquefoil(Potentillacanadensis).Thesegrasslandswereinterspersedwithbothnativeandnon-nativeshrubandvines,includingscruboak(Quercusilicifolia),smallbayberry(Morellacaroliniensis),blackcherry(Prunusserotina),wingedsumac(Rhuscopallinum),Japanesehoneysuckle(Lonicerajaponica),fox-grape(Vitislabrusca)andpoison-ivy(Toxicodendronradicans).Further,highpopulationdensitiesofturtlesandsnakeswereobservedinuplandareasontheproperty,includingrarespottedturtle(Clemmysguttata).Thus,sheepgrazingwasinitiatedatthissiteasanalternativetomowingduringthegrowingseasonbecauseofpotentiallylessimpactonwildlife.

Figure1.SquamFarmsheepgrazingexperiment.PhotoCredit:NantucketConservationFoundation.

Page 2: Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Descriptionsandplaingrassland.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CaseStudy_Squ… · Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Description Squam Farm

ManagementGoals

1) Maintainopengrasslandstructure;

2) Increasesandplaingrasslandtargetspecies;

3) Reducewoodyshrubandvinecover;

4) Reducenon-nativeinvasivespeciescover;

5) Minimizenegativeimpactstokeywildlifespecies;

6) Testthefeasibilityofimplementingalong-termgrazingprogram.

HistoryofManagement

TargetedgrazingmanagementoccurredatSquamFarmfrom2005to2015onapproximately31hectares(75acres)ofpreviously-moweduplandsontheproperty.Atargetedresearchproject(Schlimme2006)occurredwithina0.69hectareha(1.7acre)areain2005to2008.Atthistime,grazingwastheprimarymanagementtool.

Duringaten-yearperiod,avarietyofsheepbreedsweremanagedyear-roundatSquamFarm.Duringthewinter,sheepwerekeptinpermanentfencedpasturesinthesouthernsectionofthepropertyandfedbothgrainandpurchasedorlocally-grownhay.Selectedeweswerebredinthelatefalltoproducelambsinmid-April.TheinitialsheepflockconsistedofCotswold,Romney,andRomney/Cotswoldcrossbreedsandwassupplementedin2010with15NorthCountryCheviot/ScottishBlackfacecrossbreeds.

Uplandsformerlymaintainedbyannualmowingreceivedrepeatedgrazingeachyear,beginninginearlyspring(assoonasgreen-upoccurred)andcontinuinguntilthefirstkillingfrostoflatefall.Anecdotalobservationsandphotomonitoringconductedintheseareasshowedamarkeddecreaseinwoodyspeciesandacorrespondingincreaseingraminoidsovertimewiththismanagement.Inadditiontothesemanagedgrasslandsites,areascontainingdenseshrublandhabitatwithnon-native,invasivewoodyspeciessuchasJapanesehoneysuckle,autumn-olive(Elaeagnusumbellata),privet(Ligustrumspp.),orientalbittersweet(Celastrusorbiculatus)andAmurpeppervine(Ampelopsisglandulosa)werealsointenselygrazed.Thistreatmentwaseffectiveatremovingthedenseshrubunderstoryandfacilitatingaccessforfollow-upinvasivespeciesmanagement.

GrazingatSquamFarmwasdiscontinuedin2015primarilybecauseoflackoffunding,andbecauseofdifficultiesinmaintaininganimalsyear-round.

Research Aresearchprojecttookplacewithina0.69ha(1.7acre)sectionoftheNorthPasturessectionofSquamFarmfrom2005to2008.Theexperimentexaminedtheeffectsofrepeatedgrazingandmowingonearlysuccessionalvegetationcompositionoverafour-yearperiod(3yearsoftreatmentand1yearofrecovery),andcomparedthattreatmenttounmanagedcontrolareas(Beattieetal.2017,Schlimme2006).

Page 3: Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Descriptionsandplaingrassland.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CaseStudy_Squ… · Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Description Squam Farm

TheNorthPastureresearchareawasdividedintonineresearchblocks(each33mx21m)andincluded3Graze,3Mowand3Controltreatments(theControlprovidedanexampleofcurrentlyunmanagedvegetationasinfluencedbypreviousmanagement).Vegetationcommunitycompositionwassampledwithin45permanentlymarked1m2

researchplots(5plotsperresearchblock;15plotspertreatmenttype)usinga1m2

inclinedpointquadratsamplingframe.Sheepusedfortheprojectincluded28adultCotswoldsheepduringthefirst(2005)seasonandamixed,reducedsizedflockofCotswoldsandRomneysduring2006and2007.

DuringeachGrazetreatment,thesheepremainedwithinthefirstresearchblockuntiltheyhadconsumedalmostallavailableforage,thenweremovedtothesecondandthirdblocksandallowedtograzeforthesameperiodoftime.TheMowtreatmentwasperformedwithin1to2daysfromwhenthesheepwereremovedfromtheGrazetreatmentblocks.Thenumber(2or3)andtiming(month)oftreatmentsvariedbetweeneachtreatmentyearbecauseofvariationsinvegetationresponse.Notreatmentswereconductedduring2008butpost-projectvegetationmonitoringwasdone.

Vegetationcompositionwasclassifiedbyfunctionalgroup(graminoid,forb,woodyspecies),andgroundcover(bareground,litter),andquantifiedusingcoverclasses.Priortotreatments,nosignificantdifferencewasobservedbetweencoveroffunctionalgroupsandgroundcover,allowingcomparisonoffunctionalgroupsbetweentreatmentblocks.

Figure2.ExperimentaldesignoftheresearchpastureatSquamFarm.

Page 4: Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Descriptionsandplaingrassland.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CaseStudy_Squ… · Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Description Squam Farm

Afterthreeconsecutiveyearsoftreatment,shiftsinfunctionalgroupandgroundcoverdominancewereevidentintheinitialyearofrecovery(2008)inbothgrazeandMowtreatmentscomparedwiththecontroltreatmentandwithpre-treatment.Grazeandmowtreatmentssignificantlyreducedcoverofwoodyspecies.TheMowtreatmentshowedsignificantlygreaterreductioninwoodyspeciescomparedwiththeGrazetreatment.GraminoidoccurrencewassignificantlygreaterintheGrazeandMowtreatmentscomparedwiththeControl,althoughonlythemowtreatmentwassignificantlyhigherascomparedwithpre-treatment.

OverallforbspeciesdecreasedinboththeGrazeandMowtreatments,althoughtherewasnosignificancebetweenthetreatmentsorpre-treatmentforboccurrence.

BothGrazeandMowtreatmentssignificantlyincreasedthepresenceofbaregroundinthesampledplots,ascomparedtotheControlandpre-treatmentsampling.IntheGrazetreatment,baregroundwassignificantlyhigherattheendofthestudycomparedwiththemowtreatment.Treatmentshadlittleimpactontheoccurrenceoflitter,althoughtheGrazetreatmentshowedanon-significanttrendofdecreasedlitter.

Individualspeciesofmanagementinterest(includingthreesandplaingrassland-indicativespecies,threeweedy/agriculturalspecies,andtwowoodyspecies)wereanalyzedseparatelyfortrendsinresponsetotreatment.Significantchangesinthreeoftheeightspeciesweredetectedafterthreeconsecutiveyearsofmanagement.Grassleafflat-toppedgoldenrod(Euthamiagraminifolia),asandplaingrassland-indicativespecies,decreasedsignificantlyinboththeMowandGrazetreatmentscomparedwiththecontrolandpre-treatment.Theoccurrenceofsweetvernalgrass,anon-nativepasturegrass—significantlyincreasedintheMow

Figure3.Pre-andpost-treatmentresultsofgroundcoverandcoverofvegetationbyfunctionalgroup.

Page 5: Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Descriptionsandplaingrassland.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CaseStudy_Squ… · Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Description Squam Farm

treatmentcomparedwithboththeGrazeandControltreatments.Velvet-grass(anon-native,invasivegrass)occurrencesignificantlyincreasedinboththemowandgrazetreatmentscomparedtothecontrolandpretreatment.Theotherspeciesexaminedwereox-eyedaisy(Leucanthemumvulgare),Pennsylvaniasedge(Carexpensylvanica),littlebluestem(Schizachyriumscoparium),scrub-oak(Quercusilicifolia),andJapanesehoneysuckle(Lonicerajaponica),andallshowednosignificantchangesbetweentreatments.

Threeconsecutiveyearsofsheepgrazingormowingtreatmentssignificantlydecreasedthewoodyspeciesandincreasedgraminoidspecies.Grazingalonesignificantlyincreasedpatchesofbaregroundwithinthelandscape,providingareasforseedgerminationandspeciesrecruitmentinthegrasslands.

Althoughmowingandgrazinghadsimilareffectsonreducingwoodyspeciesoccurrenceandincreasinggraminoidcover,theecologicalimpactsofeachtreatmentvaried.Mowingreducedallvegetationtoauniformheight,includingnewleafandshootgrowthaswellasolderwoodystems.Incontrast,grazingwasselectiveandsheeptendedtoprefernewergrowthandprunetheyoungerfoliageandstems.Inthisstudy,theGrazetreatmentcreatedapatchymosaiceffect,andtheamountoftimespentineachgrazingtreatmentblockinfluencedtheefficiencyoftreatment.

Ultimately,disturbancebybothgrazingandmowingtreatmentsincreasedweedyspeciesinthetreatmentarea.Mowingincreasingsweetvernalgrass(Anthoxanthumodoratum)significantlymorethangrazing.Managementtreatmentsimplementedinareasthathavenotbeenrecentlymowedorgrazedshouldbemonitoredfortheestablishmentandspreadoftheseweedyspecies.Mowingandgrazingtreatmentssignificantlyreducedtheoccurrenceofgrass-leafflat-toppedgoldenrod,anativeperennialforb.Managementresultinginamosaicoftreatmenttimeandintensitymaybemoreeffectiveatmaintainingthesuiteofnativeforbspecies.

TheoverallconclusionsfromthisstudyandexperiencesatSquamFarmwerethat:(1)sheepgrazingreducedclonalshrubandvinecover,(2)grazingalsointroducedseedsofweedyagriculturalplantspecies,andthatgrazingalonewillnotlikelyresultinhabitatrestorationoverarelativelyshortperiodoftime.Constraintsofcostsandthedifficultyofmanaginganimalsyear-roundledNCFtoendthesheepgrazingprogram.

Page 6: Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Descriptionsandplaingrassland.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CaseStudy_Squ… · Case Study: Grazing at Squam Farm Site Description Squam Farm

References

Beattie,K.C.,Karberg,J.M.,Omand,K.A.,&O'Dell,D.I.,2017.Sheepgrazingasagrasslandmanagementtool:LessonslearnedonNantucketIsland,Massachusetts.NortheasternNaturalist24:45-64.

Schlimme,K.S.2006.ReturningsheeptotheislandofNantucket:aconservationexperimentatSquamFarm.Unpublishedthesis.DukeUniversity,Durham,NC.