case study: integrates robotics into end of line material ... dc web extra snyders.pdf · robotware...

40
© 2014 MHI® Copyright claimed as to audiovisual works of seminar sessions and sound recordings of seminar sessions. All rights reserved. Sponsored by: Presented by: Peter Sobol, Peach State Toby Strickland, Snyders-Lance Trusted Advisors to Supply Chain Leaders Since 1975 Case Study: Integrates Robotics Into End of Line Material Handling

Upload: duongnguyet

Post on 15-May-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

© 2014 MHI®

Copyright claimed as to audiovisual works of seminar sessions and

sound recordings of seminar sessions. All rights reserved.

Sponsored by:

Presented by:

Peter Sobol, Peach State

Toby Strickland, Snyder’s-Lance

Trusted Advisors to Supply Chain Leaders – Since 1975

Case Study:

Integrates Robotics Into

End of Line Material

Handling

Who is Lance?

• $1.7B Company

– $.9B Lance

– $.8B Snyder’s

• 4th Largest Snack Producer

• Chips, Pretzels, Cookies & Crackers

– This project is baked goods only

2

3

Lance Road to Automation

• 1913 Philip Lance Founds Company

• 1938 Implements Own Ovens

• 1950-1960 Vending; Single-Serve Focus

• 1980’s Automated Packaging Grows

• 1990’s First Robotics

• 2009 Case Study

• 2010 Snyder’s Merger

• 2012 Palletizing-Pallet Handling Automation

• 2013 System Implementation

4

Lance Road to Automation

5

Supply Chain

Production

Engineering

Facility

Engineering Controls

Engineering

IT

Packaging

Distribution

Transportation

Marketing

Logistics

Operations

Operations Year 2012

ELEVATORS

TO BRIDGE

SH

IPP

ING

DO

CK

S

STRETCH WRAP

CASE PICK

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N

STAGING

PA

LL

ET

IZIN

G

6

Palletizing Observations 2012

Robots, Unitizer & Manual Palletizing In Use Robotic

(3) Fanuc M410i

Tired & worn

Fully depreciated

Out of warranty

No longer supported

Compliance to current

standards?

Unitizer

Single-sku capability

Fully depreciated

High maintenance

Out of warranty

Inflexible

Manual

Serves multi sku’s

Labor intensive

Backup to robotics

7

Palletizing 2012

SAFETY? PEOPLE + TRAFFIC

8

Traffic Flows 2012

Empty Pallets

Tier & Trim Sheets

Slip Sheets

Palletized Loads

Wrapped Pallets

Finish Goods

Operators

Labor!

Safety?

9

Pallet Handling Labor

• Transport empty pallets (single) to robots

• Transport & place slip sheets to pallets

• Place tier sheet pallets into fixtures

• Retrieve empty tier sheet fixtures from robots

• Transport tier sheet fixtures to robots

• Transport palletized loads to stretch wrap

• Create and apply pallet LPN label

• Actuate and attend stretch wrapping

• Transport wrapped loads to staging

• Transport staged loads to warehouse elevator

10

Realize Opportunities

• Capture Labor Savings of Pallet Handling

• Create Space for Production Expansion

• Replace Palletizers

• Improve Info Accuracy and Trackability

• Integration of Supply Chain Information

11

Solution Challenges

• Fluidity of Production SKU Mix

• Production to Distribution Communication

– Verbal (radios) and paper

• Case Identification

• Technical & Organizational

• Physical Constraints

– Building column spacing

– Ceiling clearance: 15’ clear

– Vehicle traffic flow paths

– Proximity of new packaging lines

12

15’

Pallet Load Definition

Pallets

3 Types

Dunnage

3 Types

Cases

2 Types

30 Sizes

14” Long

17 lbs.

Pallet Patterns

( >30 Total)

13

SKU # Line Pal/Hr

Typical Peak Design (Design) Pad Slip Tier

1 A 7 0 0 0.0 X 1

2 A 2 0 0 0.0 X

3 A 3 0 0 0.0 X

1 A 0 14 16.8 11.2 X 1

4 B 13 13 15.6 7.0 X

5 C 9 0 0 0.0 X

6 D 0 7 8.4 0.0 X 4

7 E 13 13 15.6 7.0 X

8 F 9 0 0 0.0 X

6 G 0 7 8.4 0.0 X 4

9 A 2 0 0 0.0 X 2

10 A 2 0 0 0.0 X 1

11 A 9 0 0 0.0 X

12 A 0 16 19.2 15.0 X

13 H 9 9 10.8 9.8 X

14 I 3.5 4.5 5.4 4.9 X

15 J 3.5 4.5 5.4 4.9 X

16 K 3 0 0 0.0 X

17 L 4.5 4.5 5.4 3.4 X 1

18 M 4.5 9 10.8 6.8 X 1

19 N 13 13 15.6 10.6 X

20 O 13 13 15.6 10.6 X

21 P 0 7 8.4 6.3 X 1

22 Q 12 12 14.4 9.0 X

23 R 4 4 4.8 3.6 X

24 Hand N/A N/A N/A N/A

139 151 181 110

20 16

Lance Palletizing Rates

TOTAL

SKU

Case Rate (cpm) Dunnage

Case & Pallet Rates

Rate Killer Ideal

Pallet Patterns

14

System Concept Layout

PRIMARY MERGE

STRETCH

WRAP

PALLLET

DISPENSE

LABEL PALLLETS

ROBOTIC CELLS (5)

SORT SCANNING

15

Typical Palletizing Cell

16

Typical Palletizing Cell

17

Typical Palletizing Cell

18

Typical Palletizing Cell

19

Typical Palletizing Cell

20

Typical Palletizing Cell

21

Typical Palletizing Cell

22

Risk Mitigation

• Robot Simulation

• Primary Merge Simulation

• Evaluate Randomness of SKU Delivery

• Robot Case Queue Length

• Case Sortation Logic

• Case Recirculation Viability

23

Robot Simulation

•Robot Suppliers Simulate via Internal

Software

•Validate Rate Capability and Clearances

24

Robot Simulation

•Robot Suppliers Simulate via Internal

Software

•Validate Rate Capability and Clearances

25

Concept

•Throughput Challenges

•SKU Clustering

Design

•Perpetual Merge

•180 cpm Throughput

•Achieved SKU Dispersal

Primary Merge Simulation

413

458

457

457

456

419

418

26

Concept

•Throughput Challenges

•SKU Clustering

Design

•Perpetual Merge

•180 cpm Throughput

•Achieved SKU Dispersal

Primary Merge Simulation

413

458

457

457

456

419

418

27

Robot Cell Simulation

• Validated: – Case infeed queue length

– Sortation logic

– SKU randomness

28

Robot Cell Simulation

• Validated: – Case infeed queue length

– Sortation logic

– SKU randomness

29

Total System Simulation

30

Simulation Validated

• Total case throughputs

• “What If” scenarios

• Impact of case recirculation

• T-Car capability

• Outbound pallet throughputs

Total System Simulation

31

System Final Layout

PERPETUAL

MERGE

PRODUCTION

LAYOUT

CHANGES

32

• (5) ABB IRB-660

– (4) vacuum EOAT

– (1) clamp EOAT

– Special robot base

– RobotWare & Robot

Studio Software

Palletizing Robot

33

Clamp EOAT:

one robot for

open-top cases.

Case Scanning at Sort Induct

• Pre-Inked Bar-Codes

(bar-code scanner)

• Ink Jet Printed Character

Labels (camera)

34

• Induction speed 300 fpm +

Automatic Pallet Dispensing

• Eliminates all empty pallet handling

• Eliminates slip sheet handling

• Replenish 15 pallets at once

• Handle 3 pallet types simultaneously

35

Automatic Transport Loads to Wrap

• Automatic transfer car (T-Car)

retrieves pallet load from robot cells

• Pallet loads automatically delivered

to labeling and stretch wrapping

NO-READ STATION

3

206

204

205

219

436

210

208

209

211

212

434

R

A401

402

403

404

406

408

407

409

412

413

410

411

414

435

433

431

430

429

428

427

426

458

457

456

455

454

457

456

419

418

423

422

432

D

407A

410A

215

214

213 213

36

Automatic Transport Loads to Wrap

• Automatic transfer car (T-Car)

retrieves pallet load from robot cells

• Pallet loads automatically delivered

to labeling and stretch wrapping

NO-READ STATION

3

206

204

205

219

436

210

208

209

211

212

434

R

A401

402

403

404

406

408

407

409

412

413

410

411

414

435

433

431

430

429

428

427

426

458

457

456

455

454

457

456

419

418

423

422

432

D

407A

410A

215

214

213 213

37

System CapEx Summary

Lance Auto-Palletizing System Summary

(5) ABB IRB660 Robots

3000’ Case Conveyor

280’ Turbo Narrow Belt Sorter

(1) Dual-Load Pallet T-Car

450’ Pallet Roller Conveyor

440’ Pallet Chain Conveyor

ITW Octopus Stretch Wrapper

Pallet Dispenser (3-magazine)

Atronix WCS

TOTAL CapEx: $5.9 MM

38

Results

• 80% Labor Reduction ($1.3mm annual savings)

• Freed Space for Production Expansion

• Mitigate Accident Risk

• Eliminate Paperwork & Administrative Labor

• Provided Palletizing Redundancy

• Increased Supply Chain Data Accuracy/Visibility

39

For More Information:

Peter Sobol: [email protected]

Website: www.peachstate.com

Toby Strickland: [email protected]

website: www.snyderslance.com

Or visit MODEX 2014 Booth 4329