case study investigation of rotor hotspot temperature of a … · · 2017-06-30fbg measurement...
TRANSCRIPT
Case study
Investigation of rotor hotspot temperature of a 325 MVA hydro-generator
IRCM 2017– Orlando, Florida
Present by : Mounir Essalihi, P.EngCollaboration : Claude Hudon, IREQ
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Presentation Outline Introduction
Context of the case study
Inspection report
FBG measurement principle
Instrumentation of the rotor
Results of measurements Winter and summer temperatures Flux measurements
Discussion and Conclusions
19 mai 20172 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Introduction
The first aim of this presentation to explain how FiberBragg grating technology was used to measure the surface temperature of the pole’s field winding of a rotor in service.
A second goal was to investigate inter-turn insulation using flux measurement.
19 mai 20173 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Context of the case study
19 mai 20174 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
Visual inspection done by technical support at the plant revealed significant inter-turn insulation migration on several poles of all units of the plant
An abnormal heating seemed to be the cause of this degradation
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Context of the case study
19 mai 20175 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
We wanted to know the temperature of the hot spots of the field winding
IREQ implemented a method using fiber optic temperature sensors for rotors
We want to know at the same time if there were any inter-turn short circuits by using the flux measurement
The units have been operating for just over thirty years out of 50 years of expected life
The poles have class B insulation, maximum of 130°C To know the maximum hotspot will help to decide if
re-insulating the poles from class-B(130°C) to class-F insulation (155°C) will provide a full life cycle
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Inspection report
19 mai 20176 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
Light color Dark
color
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Inspection report
19 mai 20177 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
Rotation
Rotation
The deterioration is more marked on the lagging edge of the poles
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
FBG measurement principle
19 mai 20178 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
Rotating optical joint
Fixed partRotating part
An internal research project at the IREQ was carried out to evaluate the FBG as a temperature probe (non-conductive) FBGs are commercially available
Two years of laboratory measurements under static and rotational conditions have demonstrated the validity of these sensors
The transfer of the optical signal from the rotating part to the fixed part is done by a rotating optical joint
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
FBG measurement principle
19 mai 20179 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
Bragg grating #1
Bragg grating#2
Bragg grating#3
Fiber Optic with Bragg Gratings
Intensity Intensity
Each of the Bragg gratings reflected a wavelength λB
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
FBG measurement principle
19 mai 201710 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
λB1 λB2 λB3
Bragg Grating
λBN
λB1 λB2 λB3 λBN
ΔλB = a (T – T0)
The wavelength λB characteristic of a Bragg grating depends on the temperature
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Instrumentation of the rotor
19 mai 201711 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
The 4 poles instrumented covered all position in the inhomogeneous cooling of a rotor. The lagging edge is less cooled than the leading edge. The position of the pole relative to the spider arms change de
cooling efficiency
The four poles selected (21, 22, 23 and 24) cover a sector between two rotor spider arms
FBGFlux
FBG
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Instrumentation of the rotor
19 mai 201712 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
The rotating optical joint installed can measure up to 20 FBG in series
This rotary joint must be placed on the shaft axis It allows the passage of the light signals between the measuring
device and the FBG and back to the instruement
Flux
Measuring device
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Results of measurements
19 mai 201713 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
Two measurement campaigns were carried out May 9-10 2016 (twater = 1,5◦C) August 25-26 2016 (twater = 14,0◦C)
Flux
Test Date time end MW MVAr MVA
1 9 May 24 :00 280 0 280
2 10 May 10 :20 255 83 268
3 10 May 16 :15 268 83 281
4 25 Aug. 07 :25 255 103 274,8
5 26 Aug. 10 :15 270 89 284,3
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Results of measurements twater= 1,5 °C
19 mai 201714 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
Test conditions were not as stable as desired with a 136 MVAr excursion
Test 1Test 2
Test 3
Date and hour
Pow
er
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Results of measurements twater= 1,5 °C
19 mai 201715 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
The temperature of the hot spot on the rotor (T = 133.5 ° C) exceeded the average acceptable temperature for a class B insulation (T = 105 ° C)
Flux
Test 1Test 2
Test 3
FBG Min et Max
RTD Min et Max
RTDs are not very sensitive to rotor heating Tmax RTD < 90°C
Date and hour
P23 laggingP22 leadingDate and hour
Pow
er
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Results of measurements twater= 1,5 °C
19 mai 201716 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
The temperature of the poles depends on their position and the configuration of the ventilation channels of the rim ducts The lagging edges are all hot but the hottest is Tlagging
23> 105 ◦C The fact that the bottom of the poles (measured part) is
warmer is probably related to the “I” beam in the bottom of the rim
Flux P21 lagging
P22 lagging
P24 lagging
P23 lagging
P22 laeading
P23 lagging
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Results of measurements twater= 14 °C
19 mai 201717 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
There were some short excursion above of the MVArlimit (100 MVAR), but the major problem is that all probes exceed the limit of 105°C, with Tmaximum = 137.9 ◦ C
Flux
Test 4 Test 5
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Results of magnetic flux measurements
19 mai 201718 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
The magnetic flux in the air gap was measured on units A4 and A8
Flux
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Results of magnetic flux measurements A4
19 mai 201719 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
Flux
Compare to the average Compare to the same polarity Compare to the adjacent
The non-uniformity of the flux of unit A4 seems to be related to the shape of the air gap
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Results of magnetic flux measurements A8
19 mai 201720 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
Flux
Compare to the average Compare to the same polarity Compare to the adjacent
The pole 10 shows the same deviation in the three comparisons, this being the sign of a circuit-circuit on this pole
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Discussion
19 mai 201721 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
At commissioning, the maximum value of the average rotor temperature did not exceed 105 ° C
At that time there was no criteria of acceptability for the temperature of a hot spot on the rotor
It was considered <120 ◦C but was not measured At present, although several poles are showing
insulation migration, inter-turn short circuit is only beginning to occur.
Flux
COMET-2014, Austin, TX
Conclusion
19 mai 201722 IRMC 2017, Orlando, FL
The maximum temperature of the measured poles reached 137.9 °C This exceeds the acceptable average temperatures for:
The 4 poles measured may not be the hottest of all units in the power plant groups
A re-insulation with class F may not be sufficient to guarantee the operation for a lifetime of 50 years
A detailed study of ventilation and possible corrections is desirable to keep the rotors with their current design
The migration of the inter-turn insulation, does not yet cause generalized short-circuits