case study: lab + online usability testing

49
Case study from a Webinar presentation: Combining Lab and Online Usability Testing: Lessons Learned May 2010

Upload: userzoom

Post on 08-May-2015

4.447 views

Category:

Design


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

Case study from a Webinar presentation:

Combining Lab and Online Usability Testing: Lessons Learned

May 2010

Page 2: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

1.  Brief introduction to both research methods

2.  The power of combining methods

3.  Case study: Parallel studies

4.  Conclusion: Looking at the ‘big picture’

Overview

Page 3: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Brief introduction to both research methods

Usability testing in the Lab

Page 4: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Brief introduction to both research methods

Usability testing in the Lab Benefits/pros & limitations/cons

+  The face-to-face Catching the very details

+  Ability to ask questions/interact with the participant live

+  The ability to invite others to attend the sessions

−  Small sample size

−  Lack of natural environment/context

−  Cost +++

Page 5: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Brief introduction to both research methods

Online Usability Testing

(a.k.a. Unmoderated Remote Usability Testing)

Page 6: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Brief introduction to both research methods

Online usability testing

•  Hundreds of users can be tested

•  Participation in the natural context…

•  …from geographically spread locations

•  No human moderation needed

•  Our browser bar connects users with our secure servers

Page 7: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Online usability testing

Brief introduction to both research methods

Page 8: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Brief introduction to both research methods

Online usability testing Benefits/pros and limitations/cons

+  Quantifying usability Objective, statistically significant data

+  Automation of results, cost-effectiveness

+  Participation in the natural context

−  Lack of face-to-face

−  Can’t invite to observe sessions

−  Must anticipate participant’s questions in advance

Page 9: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

1.  Brief introduction to both research methods

2.  The power of combining methods

3.  Case study: Parallel studies

4.  Conclusion: Looking at the ‘big picture’

Overview

Page 10: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Our UX Toolkit

10

Page 11: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Power of Combining Methods

11

  Every research method has unique strengths and limitations

  Gather new insights with each method

  Greater confidence when observing similar findings through multiple methods

Lab first, then Online Online first, then Lab

Identify/fix “low hanging fruit”, then focus on remaining tasks with large sample size

Identify the most significant issues online through metrics, then use lab study to gather deeper qualitative understanding of those issues

Generate new concepts, ideas, questions through lab testing, then test/validate online

Collect video clips or more quotes of users to help bring metrics to life

Validate attitudes/preferences observed in lab testing

Gather all the metrics to validate design – if it tests well, then no need to bring users into the lab

Which one goes first?

Page 12: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

1.  Brief introduction to both research methods

2.  The power of combining methods

3.  Case study: Parallel studies

4.  Conclusion: Looking at the ‘big picture’

Overview

Page 13: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

We conducted 2 parallel studies using each method. Basic details:

•  Website tested: Amazon.com’s Grocery and Gourmet Food Store

•  Lab study conducted by the DUC

•  Online Usability Study conducted by UZ

•  Date of the study: April 2010

Page 14: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Basic details of the studies (II)

•  Objectives:

•  What is the unique contribution of each method?

•  What do we learn by combining methods?

•  Participants: 10 for the lab study, 100 for the online study

•  Study design:

•  Initial questionnaire

•  3 tasks

•  Follow up questions

•  Final questionnaire

Page 15: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Participant demographics from the Lab Usability Study:  

•  Average age 29

•  Age range between 19 and 51

•  6 Males, 4 Females

•  All had previously used Amazon.com website

•  None had ordered groceries on-line

•  Visited Amazon.com approximately every 2 weeks, on average

•  Previously purchased books, electronics, toys, and more.

•  Expected packaged, non-perishable grocery items to be sold on-line

•  Most said they hadn’t bought groceries on-line because they, “like the experience of picking

up the produce and meat.”

•  Expressed concern about products being fresh

•  A few worried about exorbitant service or shipping charges making it not worthwhile.

Page 16: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Task 1:

“You just ran out of dishwasher detergent. See if Amazon has a pack

of 6 Cascade Complete Dishwasher Detergent Powder, in the 45

ounce size.”

Page 17: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Search vs. Menu Navigation •  Approximately half of the participants wanted to immediately use SEARCH

Category Confusion •  Most likely categories were “Home & Garden”, “Grocery, Health & Beauty”

•  Chose “Grocery, Health & Beauty” through process of elimination

•  Further confusion within “Grocery, Health & Beauty”

•  “I don’t know if ‘Grocery and Gourmet food’ will have detergent”

Results of Locating Dishwashing Detergent  

Page 18: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Confusion within “Grocery & Gourmet Food” menu •  First menu is 4 screens long

•  Participants were confused where to look for dishwasher detergent

Results of Locating Dishwashing Detergent  

Dishwasher Detergent found under here

Page 19: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Nesting Confusion •  All participants were confused by path to find dishwashing detergent:

•  Amazon.com > Grocery & Gourmet Food > All Household (page is titled ‘Health & Personal Care ‘) > All Household Supplies > All Dishwashing > Scroll to locate Cascade Dishwashing Detergent

•  Participants scrolled up and down navigation menus

•  A few gave up mid-way & used SEARCH

“There are a lot of clicks to go through: In Household Cleaners, Kitchen Cleaners…I don’t see dishes…maybe by brand? I don’t see Cascade here. I would do SEARCH.”

“That took probably 5-6 minutes. For me, that’s really long.”

Results of Locating Dishwashing Detergent  

Page 20: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Task 2:

“You want to buy Skippy Peanut Butter. Find out if there are any

discounts or coupons for it.”

Page 21: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Product Search vs. Coupon Search •  A few looked on Amazon.com home page for Today’s Deals

•  Most looked for the product in the “Grocery” section, and then looked for a coupon

•  Some looked at “Special Offers” in the “Grocery” screen

•  Special Offers led to a coupon and New and Used food, which disturbed participants.

Results of Locating Skippy Peanut Butter Coupon  

Page 22: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Participants that looked for the product complained about the length of the menu on the left side of the grocery page

•  Peanut Butter, under “Sauces and Dips,” was four screens down plus 2 clicks. “It was tedious.”

Results of Locating Skippy Peanut Butter Coupon

Page 23: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Users had strong feelings about coupons for grocery items

“I would expect they’d show me the price they have, it doesn’t matter if it is cheaper.”

“If I am purchasing a big purchase, I would do it from Google. I would look for coupons [only] for big items.”

“I would have preferred to see a link from the home page– specials, coupons, etc…I don’t want to hunt down each thing.”

“It was not clear that a discount was available until you went to the [item] description page”

“I had to look through a lot of things."

Results of Locating Skippy Coupon

Page 24: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Task 3:

“Find out how you would schedule the same groceries to be

delivered every 3 months.”

Page 25: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

All found the correct starting place: the “Grocery & Gourmet Food” page •  Most noticed the “Shop Subscribe and Save” link

•  Others tried to schedule each item from the item’s page

“I think you will have to do it for every item.”

“I would probably go to the product and check if I can schedule it.”

“[a product page] might say, “do you want this delivered?”

Scheduling Groceries for Repeated Delivery  

Page 26: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Participants were confused on how to schedule grocery delivery •  Most missed the delivery scheduling link at the top of the page

“The text was small, and I wasn’t sure I was in the right place.”

“The grayed-out part doesn’t jump out”

Scheduling Groceries for Repeated Delivery

Delivery Scheduling Information Link

Page 27: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Confusing IA “Dishwasher detergent was under “Health [& Personal Care], which is not the first place I’d look.””

“There were too many categories, it confuses you…”

“It is not as well organized as other parts of Amazon.”

“I don’t know why ‘All Household Supplies’ is under ‘Health and Personal Care’”

Difficult navigation “Navigation wasn’t intuitive. The left-hand-side menu was so far down the page and not duplicated in the banner.”

“The browse list was too long. I don’t want to go through 10 chocolates before going to the pasta.”

“It didn’t feel intuitive.”

“I didn’t like how many levels I had to go through.”

“It was hard to find things. There were long lists to find food items.”

Conclusions from the Lab Study  

Page 28: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Case study: Parallel studies

Highlighted findings from the Online Usability Study:

Page 29: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Study Background

29

Profile

- 71% Male, 29% Female

-  Age range distributed between 18–55; 88% fell between 26-45

- All have purchased from Amazon.com and visit Amazon once a week, month or every few months.

-  Eighty-eight percents of participants purchase groceries from in the store only, 6% online only and 6% both online and in a store.

-  Main reasons for considering purchasing groceries online is for convenience and time.

Details

- April 17th to April 26, 2010

-  Unmoderated remote usability testing method

-  100 participants -  Recruited through participant panel

Page 30: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Overview of tasks and validation criteria

1.   Locate specific item: You just ran out of dishwasher detergent. Find Cascade Complete Dishwasher Detergent Powder, 45 oz (pack of 6).

Validation by reaching the correct page with the detergent (URL validation)

2.   Finding a discount code: You want to buy Skippy Peanut Butter with a discount you heard about on Amazon.com. Please write down the discount code.

Validation by choosing the correct discount code (multiple choice)

3.   Schedule grocery delivery: Find out how often you can schedule a delivery to your home.

Validation by how often you can set up a delivery (multiple choice)

30

Page 31: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com 31

Study Design

Initial Questionnaire:

How frequently do you visit Amazon.com?

Where do you usually buy your groceries?

Why have you considered purchasing groceries online?

Post Task:

Validation by url or question (Success, Error, Abandon ratios collected).

Ease of Use.

How intuitive links and menus were and how easy it was to start the search.

Issues and problems experienced while completing tasks.

Final Questionaire:

Overall satisfaction

Satisfaction with navigation, product search, information offered and look and feel of the site.

Likelihood to purchase groceries from Amazon.com.

Likelihood to recomment to a friend.

Page 32: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

T1: Locating Cascade Complete

32

Success Non-Success

73%

72%

77%

It was clear how to start searching for the

dishwasher detergent

The menus and links were intuitive to use

I never felt lost on the site while searching

Participants did feel particularly lost on the site (most likely due to experience using Amazon.com.

However they did not feel the menus and links were extremely intuitive and weren’t always sure were to start their search.

Page 33: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

T1: Locating Cascade Complete

33

Highlights  dominant  path  

*3%  insignificance  removed  Over half (51%) of the participants defaulted to using search indicating the menus and navigation of the site were not very intuitive.

Fifteen percent started in Health and Personal while 5% looked in promotional deals.

Page 34: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

T1: Locating Cascade Complete

34

What participants found difficult when attempting the task:

Exact Quotes:

“ Hard to navigate to find desired product. Too long and was getting frustrating.”

“ There were a lot of results so you have to type it in exactly or spend a couple minutes searching.”

“ I didn’t see a soap category and didn’t realize how the search function worked.”

“ I didn’t know where to look.”

Page 35: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

T2: Finding a discount code

35

Success Non-Success

Forty-seven percent of the participants thought it was very difficult to locate the discount code. They thought it was very unclear how to start searching, it was not where they expected it to be and were somewhat lost during the search process.

Extremely Easy Extremely Difficult

Page 36: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

T2: Finding a discount code

36

Page 37: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

T2: Finding a discount code

37

Error participants (55%) could not locate the code, thought it was too difficult to find the code or the peanut butter and stated:

“ I was expecting the discount in the results page, or the product page. I ended up looking for it under ’specials’, but I don’t know if that’s the best place for it.”

“ Too much searching and clicking.”

“ Looked under special offers having firstly used search, had to notice the offer code above product within the offer description.”

Page 38: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

T3: Schedule Grocery Delivery

38

Success Non-Success

Seventy-five percent of participants could not complete the task. They did not think it was clear how to start searching and felt lost during the search process. Forty percent of participants who were successful, felt it was very difficult to complete the task.

Extremely Easy Extremely Difficult

Page 39: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

T3: Schedule Grocery Delivery

39

Abandon participants (38%) could not find the information, thought the menus were difficult to understand and the task was taking too long.

“ It was not obvious to me that I needed to click on the link at the top right of the screen to get this information until I had spent quite a bit of time looking all over the rest of the screen.”

“ I wasn’t certain where to look for the information.”

“ Nothing about this process has been user friendly.”

Page 40: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Final Questionnaire

40

Fifty-three percent of participants thought the navigation was very difficult, 39% thought it was difficult to search for a product, forty-seven percent rated the overall look and feel of the site as very poor.

Page 41: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Final Questionnaire

41

Fifty-five percent of participants stated they would not purchase their groceries in the future from Amazon.com.

Net Promoter Score (NPS) calculation: 0 to 6 = Detractors 7 to 8 = Passive 9 to 10 = Promoters Net Promoter Score (NPS) = % of Promoters - % of Detractors

Page 42: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

1.  Brief introduction to both research methods

2.  The power of combining methods

3.  Case study: Parallel studies

4.  Conclusion: Looking at the ‘big picture’

Overview

Page 43: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Conclusions: Looking at the ‘big picture’

•  Main, obvious issue:

Gourmet store was built like the book store

•  IA + navigation + labeling + content problems/issues encountered

•  Both research methods prove this:

1.  By observing & listening at the Lab we learned a lot, but also…

2.  …we quantified how big the issues were using UserZoom

Page 44: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Conclusions: Looking at the ‘big picture’

Page 45: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

The introductions…

Alfonso de la Nuez Partner & Chief

Marketing Officer at UserZoom

Kim Oslob Research & Product Strategy Director

at UserZoom

Bill Albert Director of the Design &

Usability Center, Bentley University

Page 46: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

  Leading online user experience research software company

  Develops proprietary on-demand software app for online research

  Built for & by UX & marketing professionals

  Offers a cost-effective, time-saving methodology

  Has 9 years of experience in UX research & consulting

  Has offices in Sunnyvale (CA), London (UK) & Barcelona (Spain)

The introductions

Page 47: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

  The Design and Usability Center at Bentley University was founded in 1999

  Provides UX consulting services to corporate clients

  Supports the MS program in Human Factors in Information Design

  Focuses on user experience research and evaluation

The introductions

Page 48: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

Acknowledgements

48

  Special thanks to Cynthia Kamishlian

and Dharmesh Mistry from Bentley

University for carrying out this

research

  Based on our recent book “Beyond

the Usability Lab”, co-authored with

Tom Tullis and Donna Tedesco

Page 49: Case study: Lab + Online Usability Testing

www.userzoom.com

º

49

USA 440 N. Wolfe Rd. Sunnyvale, CA 94085 USA

Phone: +1 (408) 524 – 74 45 Contact: Alfonso de la Nuez [email protected]

UK Aylesbury House, 17 – 18 Aylesbury Street, London ECIR 0DB, UK

Phone: +44 (0) 20 7193 2171 Cell: +44 (0) 7900 472 920 Contact: Arthur Moan [email protected]

SPAIN Av. Diagonal 419 3º 2ª 08008 Barcelona, Spain

Phone: +34 93 414 7554 Cell: +34 93 368 4295 Contact: Javier Darriba [email protected]

Thanks so much for your time!

Oh! Don’t forget:

The slides and the video of this webinar will be available in a few days in our blog

www.userzoom.com