Case study no. 3

Group no. 6

Questione 1• The container must be kept.

• More documents are requested:

• - notification from FBO (part I of CED filled in by FBO)

• - declaration of FBO regarding the use of the product (direct human consumption or process)

Questione 2• The product with code no 100620 is not under the Regulation

669/2009.

• Annex 1 states the control for Basmati rice (from Pakistan and India) for direct human consumption.

• Yes, the evidence is in commercial invoice (description of the product) and bill of lading.

Questione 3

• The container was held in order to complete the documents file.

• The product is subject to official control under Reg. 669/2009.

• Yes , CEDs are required.

Questione 4

• Yes

Questione 5

• Two documentary checks and 1 phisical checks (50%)

• 50% of consignments to be sampled.

Questione 6

• aflatoxins

Questione 7

• Reg 401/2006 and European Guidelines for sampling and determination of aflatoxins

Q 8

• Yes

• The consignment stays under official control until results arrive due to provisions of Reg 669/2009.

Q 9

• In case we do not have enough space and appropriate facilities to keep the consignments and check them – art 19 of Reg 212/2010 .

Q 10

• Yes, it is released for free circulation

• Advise Customs with Annex 2 – the original form.

• The original CED goes with the consignment.

• Yes, we keep a copy.

Q 11

• Rejection of consignment and RASFF notification.

• FBO will decide to re-export or destroy.

Q 12

• No

Q 13

• FBO can not split the consignment according to the provisions of Reg 669/2009.