case study on new hr policy( human resource)
TRANSCRIPT
MissionChrist University is a nurturing ground for an
individual’s holistic development to make effective contribution to the society in a
dynamic environment
VisionExcellence and Service
Core ValuesFaith in God | Moral Uprightness
Love of Fellow Beings | Social Responsibility | Pursuit of Excellence
Case Study on
Towards a new HR PhilosophyPresented by:Group 2
Excellence and Service
Christ University
The role of HR is assumed to be that of administrative with little or no strategic impact.
They tend to be a mediator in case a problem arises between the manager and employees.
But is that all the HR does?What is the appropriate role of HR function?
CASE
Excellence and Service
Christ University
Reasons for Gap
Managers and Executives focus on financial results rather than managing people.
HR then has to 'lean in' to take responsibilities.
This entire process separates managers from it's employees and enforces a result VS people approach
Excellence and Service
Christ University
SOLUTION SUGGESTED
Helping Managers manage Developing Leaders Letting Management manage Compensation Dealing with conflict People People
Excellence and Service
Christ University
Helping Managers Manage
Invlove employees in the change process.
Interview employees regarding their feelings.
Concentrate on effective delegation.Ask employees for committment.
Excellence and Service
Christ University
Devloping Leaders
Outsourcing leadership development is risky. Building it from inside is always a better option. Values like integrity, intelligence along with “thinking like an
owner”, innovation and ability to inspire others. Should be developed by both managers and employees. Leadership to be taught from the orientation of new hires. Managers are supposed to assess the needs of the company,
design, build curricula and teach.
Excellence and Service
Christ University
Letting Management Manage• Management make the critical HR decision.• Managers should be empowered to make relevant decision and be responsible for
the outcome.• HR constrains decision: a) Hiring, b) Payment & c) Performance Rating Managers losing their freedom to obtain desired results.• Freedom = Responsibility
• Recruitment – Flow of qualified candidates, managers conduct interviews to hire.
• People and Organizational Development only provides;• actionable data • useful tools• in-house recruitment certification.
• Evaluate candidates with standardized tests.• Same philosophy to other people processes, including performance assessment.
Excellence and Service
Christ University
Excellence and Service
Christ University
Compensation
Minimum and maximum pay numbers are not restricted instead market salaries are researched and guidelines are provided to managers.
Departments make compensation because they are responsible for hiring the right people and managing how those people perform
They believe that improving results in company performance benefits all employees.
Excellence and Service
Christ University
Dealing with conflict
Talking with the other person Focus on behaviour and events, not on
personalities. Listening carefully. Identify points of agreement and
disagreement. Priortize the areas of conflict. Develop a plan to work on each conflict.
Excellence and Service
Christ University
People
Hiring is quite lean and a rigorous process. Candidates are interviewed extensively both by senior
memebers of the department and by internal clients. Interest takes the front seat rather than big company HR
experience. Candidates scaled on various parameters. Companies this way would become more productive.
Excellence and Service
Christ University
Conclusion
Success of an organisation lies entirely on their employees and employers. So, there should be no false dichotomy between both.By taking what appears to be a less active role, HR is acheiving greater influence and greater success both for company and themselves.
Excellence and Service
Christ University