case%study%+%automo/ve% - the horinko group · case%study%+%automo/ve% amy%lilly,%hyundai%...
TRANSCRIPT
Case Study -‐ Automo/ve
Amy Lilly, Hyundai Brenda Baney, Delphi
Oct 22nd, 2014
agenda • History of IMDS • GADSL and IMDS Infrastructure • IMDS Rules
– Recommenda/on 001 • Structure • Wildcards / Jokers
– Rec 019 Flat BOM • Recent Changes
– IMDS 9.0 Update • Faster IMDS updates throughout chain • OEM / Supplier Workgroups on Data Quality, OEM Inconsistency
– CAMDS and METI • Lessons Learned / Next Steps
– Lessons Learned – Supply Chain survey on-‐going concerning data sharing
History Lesson – Auto regula/ons • Auto specific chemical regula/ons began in Europe
– European End-‐of-‐Life Vehicle Direc/ve passed 2000 – Banned substances effected 2003: heavy metals – Mandatory recycling percentages, improvement targets
• ELV Annex II list of heavy metal exemp/ons is comple/ng 7th stakeholder revision, entering 8th
• Other regula/ons around the world addressing chemicals with automo/ve impact – Europe:
• RoHS • REACH
– U.S.: • CA Green Chemistry • TSCA
– Canada: • Canadian Gaze`e
– Global: • Stockholm Conven/on
4
IMDS (Interna/onal Material Data System)
Efficient management of a huge amount of data
Easy overview on chemicals in parts
Quick feedback and effec/ve communica/on between suppliers and OEMs
In 1999, 7 OEMs decided to develop one common collec/on tool
Challenges Target
Web based Standardized Quan/ta/ve report Computeriza/on
Move from Paper to Electronic Data
Fulfillment of legal requirements with lowest effort
• The automo/ve industry collaborated with EDS (now HP) on an innova/ve new database
• Access: www.mdsystem.com
5
2000 2001/02 2004 2003
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
IMDS History
6
Global Automotive Declarable Substance List www.gadsl.org
Criteria: • Substance expected in automobile part or vehicle • Substance is regulated or projected to be regulated • Reportable threshold levels will be based on the lowest level required
by regula/on or scien/fic evalua/on.
GADSL
7
• Within the whole supply chain, each supplier has to enter the substance & material informa/on for his component to the IMDS-‐account of his customer
• Results in a more or less complex “Material Data Sheet” that is sent from the Tier 1 Supplier to the car manufacturer (OEM)
• The OEM is using the data to check compliance of the purchased parts and substances for internal requirements as well as legal obliga/ons
• Each level of the chain can (and is) using the data to check and proof compliance
• Data ownership (and responsibility) is on data creator site
• Data cannot be modified by the reciever (without genera/ng a new version (Data ID)
Data Collec/on for IMDS
Raw Material supplier
Tier n supplier
Tier 2 supplier
Tier 1 supplier
OEM
IMDS Communica/on of substance informa/on
GADSL One reference list for declarable substances
Pictures of IMDS Use of confiden/al substances With appropriate flagging methods
Printed Circuit Board (PCB) & small electronic components
Component & compliance detail received but assembly summariza/on provided
IMDS Func/on & Rules • Recommenda/on 001 (general)
– In principle, agreed to by all par/cipa/ng OEMs – Addresses rules surrounding:
• Level of disclosure, including – Pseudo substances, such as ABS, ceramics, etc… – “joker/wildcards” represen/ng non-‐GADSL industry confiden/al substances
allowed to be stated within a material up to 10% by weight total • Published materials
– By IMDS Steering Commi`ee and/or recognized industry bodies – Problems with individual company published data quality & accuracy along
with accessibility. ***need for lowest /er engagement • Con/nuing evolu/on as disclosure needs expand
• Recommenda/on 019 (electronics repor/ng) – Developed by mainly Tier 1 supplier group for collec/ng compliance data & simplifying (i.e. Flat BOM) submissions
• Material naming conven/ons for components <5g (in-‐progress) • Use of ‘standard material set’ for describing populated PCB
IMDS 9.0 / Recent Changes • IMDS Updates in past 5 years
– New look & new platorm (right click) – New func/onality focused on:
• Data Quality, checks suggest correc/ons (ex. material classifica/ons) • Data Ownership, restrict unauthorized copies • Allowing faster updates to flow from material manufacturers up through supply chain to downstream end customers
• Up-‐coming Enhancements to focus on: – Unified requirements (OEMs & /ers) – Supply Chain Confiden/ality – Published data accuracy & accountability – Flexibility for new environmental regs (ex. Biocides)
China ELV Regula/on
Administra/ve Rules (Drauing)
GB Substance restriction
GB/T 19515-‐2004 R&R Calcula/on
Method
GB/T 26988-‐2011 Marks for
Recoverability
GB/T 26989-‐2011 Recovery Terminology
Examina/on and Audit Procedure
Tech Policy (2007)
4 Industrial Standards Tes/ng Methods
The key regula/on of China ELV
Structure of China ELV
METI Japanese Data Proposal 1. Japanese government (METI) is fully commi`ed to development of new
informa/on transfer scheme (tools). Release format & support tools 2014
2. In globally-‐connected supply chain, need standardized informa/on methods for chemicals in products. Working with various standards bodies
Big Impact for supply chain
METI (Japanese govt) new info system 2014 pilot
Pictures of CAMDS & METI proposal
CAMDS -‐ IMDS clone (2009) Addi/onal databases
Recycled content VOC Test data
Lessons Learned • Benefits
– Well established process across the automo/ve industry – Provides a consistent means of repor/ng for suppliers – Reduces costs by having harmonized rules for fulfilling various global
chemical regulatory regimes • Issues
– Took 5 years, at least, to reach data quality, and work is on-‐going – Data is only as good as what is entered
• Must rely on supplier support and informa/on • Regional concerns with raw material data
– Only applies to exis/ng regula/ons and is not future looking • GADSL list is based on current & pending regula/ons • Discussions on-‐going about expansion to include forecasted substances for
informa/on purposes. – An inves/ga/on for a given substance via IMDS can take up to 6 months
due to repor/ng complexity in the automo/ve supply chain – Based on CAS numbers as substance iden/fies and not always provided in
regula/ons
Addi/onal considera/ons • IMDS is an automo/ve system working very well for car manufacturers
• Suppliers have indicated a need for more mul/-‐industry collabora/on concerning informa/on on chemicals in materials and products
• Drivers – Opera/onal efficiency – Compliance & Reputa/onal risk – Stakeholder expecta/ons
• Benefits – Crea/ng sustainable product development processes – Improved risk management – Expor/ng a global culture of responsibility