cation ordering in tunnel compounds determined by tem
TRANSCRIPT
1/48Hadermann
Cation ordering in tunnel manganites solved by TEM
Joke Hadermann
2/48Hadermann
Acknowledgements
Moscow State University: A.M. Abakumov, M. Kovba, E.V. Antipov
CRISMAT, Ensicaen: L. Gillie, C. Martin, M. Hervieu, O. Pérez, E. Suard
EMAT: G. Van Tendeloo
3/48Hadermann
Overview
• Introduction:
- What are tunnel manganites?
- The possible frameworks (hosts) in a logical order...
- The guests
• Generalization of the description and new examples of tunnel manganites
- SrMn3O6
- CaMn3O6
- Todorokite with rock salt type tunnel contents
4/48Hadermann
MnO6
octahedra
connect octahedra into infinite chains by edge sharing
What are tunnel manganites?
connect chains by
edge- and/or corner sharing in a circular manner
chains of MnO6
octahedra
tunnel framework
5/48Hadermann
MnO6
Pyrolusite
Rutile-type tunnelsIndicated as "R“1 x 1
Ref.: A.S. John, Phys.Rev.21(1923)389
a=b= 4.40 Å
c= 2.87 Å
Pyrolusite or β-MnO2: 1 x 1
6/48Hadermann
Ref.: Bystroem, A.M., Acta Chemica Scandinavica (1949), 3, 163-173
Ramsdellite: 2 x 1
a= 4.46 Åb= 9.32 Åc= 2.85 Å
7/48Hadermann
alpha-MnO2
Ref.: Kondrashev, Yu.D.;Zaslavskii, A.I., Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Fizicheskaya (1951), 15, 179-186
Ramsdellite
8/48Hadermann
Hollandite
Ref.: Bystroem, A.;Bystroem, A.M., Acta Crystallographica (1950), 3, 146-154
BaMn8O16
a= 4.46 Åb= 9.32 Åc= 2.85 Å
9/48Hadermann
And in the same manner...
Pyrolusite Ramsdellite
Hollandite Romanechite
Todorokite
1 x 1 2 x 1
2 x 2 3 x 2
3 x 3
Woodruffite
4 x 3
10/48Hadermann
Pyrolusite Ramsdellite Hollandite
11/48Hadermann
Pyrolusite Ramsdellite Hollandite
approx.2.85 Å
12/48Hadermann
Marokite: hexagonal tunnels
Ref.: Lepicard, G.;Protas, J., Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences (1964), 258, 1847-1849
CaMn2O4
a= 9.71 Åb= 10.03 Åc= 3.162 Å
13/48Hadermann
More complex forms
Ref.:N.Floros,C.Michel,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,JSSC(2001), 162, 34-41
Na1.1Ca1.8Mn9O18Ba6Mn24O48
Ref.: P.Boullay,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,JSSC (1997), 132, 239-248
CaMn4O8
Ref.: N.Barrier,C.Michel,A.Maignan,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,J. Mat. Chem.(2005), 15, 386-393
14/48Hadermann
NaScTiO4: 8-shaped tunnels
A.F.Reid, A.D.Wadsley, M.J.Sienko, Inorganic Chemistry (1968), 7, 112-118
15/48Hadermann
More complex forms
Ref.:N.Floros,C.Michel,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,JSSC(2001), 162, 34-41
Na1.1Ca1.8Mn9O18Ba6Mn24O48
Ref.: P.Boullay,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,JSSC (1997), 132, 239-248
CaMn4O8
Ref.: N.Barrier,C.Michel,A.Maignan,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,J. Mat. Chem.(2005), 15, 386-393
16/48Hadermann
More complex forms
Ba6Mn24O48
Ref.: P.Boullay,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,JSSC (1997), 132, 239-248
Ref.:N.Floros,C.Michel,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,JSSC(2001), 162, 34-41
Na1.1Ca1.8Mn9O18CaMn4O8
Ref.: N.Barrier,C.Michel,A.Maignan,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,J. Mat. Chem.(2005), 15, 386-393
17/48Hadermann
The guest cations
AxMnO2
•Size of guests determines size and shape of tunnels•The charges on the tunnel cations are balanced by the substitution of some Mn+3 by Mn+4
Mn+3 - Mn+4 charge order in hollandite, romanechite and todorokite •Different repeat periods guest and framework
often incommensurately modulated
18/48Hadermann
Overview
• Introduction:
- What are tunnel manganites?
- The possible frameworks (hosts) in a logical order...
- The guests
• Generalization of the description and new examples of tunnel manganites
- SrMn3O6
- CaMn3O6
- Todorokite with rock salt type tunnel contents
19/48Hadermann
SrMn3O6: 8-shaped tunnels
Gillie et al., JSSC 177 (2004) 3383-3391
20/48Hadermann
JSSC, 177 (2004) 3383
[001]
SrMn3O6
21/48Hadermann
q= 0.52a* + 0.28c*
JSSC, 177 (2004) 3383
2000
0010
00010002
00032011
-2011
2012-
2013-
2010
SrMn3O6
22/48Hadermann
q= 0.52a* + 0.28c* q= 0.54a* + 0.29c*
q= 0.66a* + 0.33c*q= 0.52a* + 0.31c*
SrMn3O6
JSSC, 177 (2004) 3383
23/48Hadermann
CaMn2O4
N.Barrier,C.Michel,A.Maignan,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,J. Mat. Chem.(2005), 15, 386-393
Lepicard, G.;Protas, J., Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences (1964), 258, 1847-1849
m=2CaMn2O4
literatureCaMnmO2m
m=3CaMn3O6
this work
m=4CaMn4O8
literature
CaMn4O8
CaMn3O6
24/48Hadermann
CaMn2O4
CaMn3O6
Hadermann et al., Chem. Mater, 18 (2006) 5530
25/48Hadermann
Hadermann et al., Chem. Mater, 18 (2006) 5530
CaMn3O6
26/48Hadermann
Sub a*
Sub c*
CaMn3O6= Ca0.66Mn2O4
CaMn3O6
2/3 of Ca-positions occupied
Hadermann et al., Chem. Mater, 18 (2006) 5530
27/48Hadermann
q= 2/3a* + 1/3 c*
Hadermann et al., Chem. Mater, 18 (2006) 5530
Subcell:a=9.07Åb=11.3 Åc=2.83 Å
CaMn3O6
28/48Hadermann
CaMn3O6:q= 2/3a* + 1/3 c* γ= 0.33
Ca(1-0.33)/2MnO2= Ca0.33MnO2= Ca1Mn3O6
CaMn2O4:c=3.162 Åq= 0 c* γ= 0
Ca(1-0)/2MnO2= Ca0.5MnO2 = Ca1Mn2O4
The compositionally modulated structure approach
CaMn4O8:c=5.6474 Åq= 1/2 c* γ= 0.5
Ca(1-0.5)/2Mn2O4= Ca0.25MnO2=CaMn4O8
CaxMnO2
x= (1- γ )/2 Ca(1- γ)/2MnO2J. Mat. Chem. 19 (18)2660
29/48Hadermann
Orange=Mn+4-δO6 octahedraYellow=Mn+3+δO6 octahedra
Charge ordering stabilizes the structure
CaMn3O6
Hadermann et al., Chem. Mater, 18 (2006) 5530
30/48Hadermann
CaMn3O6
CaMn2O4
The compositionally modulated structure approach
CaMn4O8
x= (1- γ )/2 Ca(1- γ)/2MnO2
Fits forUse same formula Sr(1- γ)/2MnO2
for Sr1±δMn3O6
J. Mat. Chem. 19 (18), 2660
31/48Hadermann
q= 0.52a* + 0.28c* q= 0.54a* + 0.29c*
q= 0.66a* + 0.33c*q= 0.52a* + 0.31c*
SrMn3O6
32/48Hadermann
q= 0.66a* + 0.33c*
CaMn3O6:SrMn3O6:
q= 0.66a* + 0.33c*
SrMn3O6 versus CaMn3O6
33/48Hadermann
q= 0.52a* + 0.28c* q= 0.54a* + 0.29c*
q= 0.66a* + 0.33c*q= 0.52a* + 0.31c*
Sr0.72Mn2O4 Sr0.71Mn2O4
Sr0.69Mn2O4 Sr0.66Mn2O4
=Sr1.08Mn3O6 =Sr1.07Mn3O6
=Sr1.04Mn3O6 =Sr1Mn3O6
SrMn3O6
x= (1- γ )/2Sr(1- γ)/2MnO2
34/48Hadermann
The composite structure approach
Two subsystems:
FrameworkMnO2
Guest cations A1-x
Subsystem Ic-parameter = c1
Subsystem IIc-parameter = c2
g=ha*+kb*+lc1*+mc2*q=c2*= γ c1*
Ratio cell volumes= VI/VII = γ
c1*
c2*
35/48Hadermann
Composite structure Ba6Mn24O48
Tetragonal, a=18.2 Å,c1=2.8 Å and c2=4.6 Å
(a,c1) framework (a,c2) barium ions
Ref.: P.Boullay,M.Hervieu,B.Raveau,JSSC (1997), 132, 239-248
36/48Hadermann
FrameworkMnO2
Guest cations Ax
Subsystem Ic-parameter = c1
Subsystem IIc-parameter = c2
q=c2*= γ c1*
p = number of octahedra in the average unit cellr = number of A-cation columns in the average unit cell
General case: x= γ r / p
The composite structure approach
37/48Hadermann
Example 1: Ba6Mn24O48
c1=2.8 Å and c2=4.6 Å so γ=0.609 p = 24r = 10
So x= 0.609. 10 / 24 = 0.253gives Ba0.253MnO2is equal to Ba6.072Mn24O48
p = number of octahedra in the average unit cellr = number of A-cation columns in the average unit cell
General case: x= γ r / p
The composite structure approach
123
456
78
γ
38/48Hadermann
Example 2: CaMn4O8literature c=5.6474 Å so c1=2.823 and c2= 5.6474 Å= 2 c1
so γ=0.5 p = 16r = 8
So x= 0.5 . 8 / 16 = 0.25gives Ca0.25MnO2is equal to CaMn4O8
p = number of octahedra in the average unit cellr = number of A-cation columns in the average unit cell
General case: x= γ r / p
The composite structure approach
39/48Hadermann
FrameworkMnO2
Guest cations A1-x
Subsystem Ic-parameter = c1
Subsystem IIc-parameter = c2
q=c2*= γ c1*
p = number of octahedra in the average unit cellr = number of A-cation columns in the average unit cell
General case: x= γ r / p
Simplification for square tunnels?(Hollandite, todorokite,…)
Square tunnels: x= γ m / 2 n
m = number of cation columns in the tunneln= number of chains in the bricks
The composite structure approach
40/48Hadermann
[SrF0.82(OH)0.18]2.5[Mn6O12]
41/48Hadermann
[SrF0.82(OH)0.18]2.5[Mn6O12]
a=9.7846(3) Åc1=2.8406(1) Å c2=4.49 Åq1=c2*=0.63181(3)c1*= γc1*
42/48Hadermann
[SrF0.82(OH)0.18]2.5[Mn6O12]
Electron diffraction:a=9.7846(3) Åc1=2.8406(1) Åc2=4.49 Åq1=c2*=0.63181(3)c1*= γc1*P42/m(00γ)s0
X-ray refinement:guests in rock salt type (NaCl) arrangement c
a
43/48Hadermann
Average interplanar spacing 89 Å
a’=2a
q2=0.0176(1)a*+0.07497b*
b
a
Submitted to Chemistry of Materials
[SrF0.82(OH)0.18]2.5[Mn6O12]
44/48Hadermann
The composite structure approachFramework
MnO2
Guest cations A1-x
Subsystem Ic-parameter = c1
Subsystem IIc-parameter = c2
q=c2*= γ c1*
Square tunnels: x= γ m / 2n
m = number of cation columns in the tunneln= number of chains in the bricks
p = number of octahedra in the average unit cellr = number of A-cation columns in the average unit cell
General case: x= γ r / p
J. Mat. Chem. 19 (18) 2660
45/48Hadermann
q=c2*= γ c1*
Square tunnels: x= γ m / 2n
n=number of chains in the brickm = number of cation columns in the tunnel
Todorokite: q1=c2*=0.63181(3)c1*= γc1*so γ = 0.63181n = 3 m = 4
So x= 0.63181 . 4 / 2 .3 =0.421 gives [SrX]0.421MnO2
is equal to [SrX]2.53Mn6O12
The composite structure approach:
square tunnel simplification
J. Mat. Chem. 19 (18) 2660
46/48Hadermann
q1=c2*=0.63181(3)c1*= γc1*so γ = 0.63181p = 6r = 4
So x= 0.63181 . 4 / 6 = 0.421gives [SrX]0.421MnO2is equal to [SrX]2.53Mn6O12
p = number of octahedra in the average unit cell
r = number of A-cation columns in the average unit cell
General case: x= γ r / p
The composite structure approach:
q=c2*= γ c1*
Todorokite:
general formula
J. Mat. Chem. 19 (18) 2660
47/48Hadermann
Conclusions
• The first manganite analogue of NaFeTiO4 is synthesized: SrMn3O6
• The compound CaMn3O6 is synthesized and turns out to have a CaMn2O4 framework
• The ordering of Ca with vacancies in the tunnels is derived from the modulation vector
• A general formula is proposed to calculate the composition of the different phases directly from the modulation vector
A(1- γ)/2MnO2
- fits CaxMnO2 and SrxMnO2 compounds
48/48Hadermann
Conclusions
• A new todorokite type phase is presented, containing 4 cation columns instead of the traditional 1: rock salt type ordered guest
• The general formula for determining the composition directly from the ratio of the two c-parameters in a composite structure is
AxMnO2 with x= γ r / p
r= # A-cations, p = # octahedra
• A simplified form for square tunnels:
AxMnO2 with x= γ m / 2n
m= # A-cations, n = # chains in brick